Laserfiche WebLink
Barnett Kia – 3610 Hwy 61 <br />Gem Lake Planning Commission 8/13/24 <br />August 1, 2024 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />N. 10.5. Building facades – It is expected that large expanses of showroom glass will be oriented to the <br />principal frontage. The balance of the dealership shall have fenestration related the use in that portion <br />of the building. <br />O. 10.5.1.1 – Automotive Dealership Exception - Overhead doors facing any direction shall be permitted. <br />P. 10.7. Materials – Add in 1. Primary materials may be face brick, stone, glass including glass doors, <br />architectural concrete, or precast concrete units (integrally colored block or textured block), provided <br />that surfaces are molded, serrated examples, or treated with a textured material in order to give the <br />wall surface a three-dimensional character. ACM (aluminum composite material) is allowed as a <br />primary or secondary material. <br />Q. 10.10. Outdoor Storage. - Outdoor storage is a permitted use for an Automotive Dealership. <br />R. 16.13. Fences. Automotive Dealerships may have security fencing up to 8’ in heights provided it is at <br />least 80% open. <br />S. 18.5 Screening- The parking areas not adjacent to a residential use are considered “retail <br />merchandise display” and not required to be screened. <br />T. 18.8.4 Lighting – The parking and outdoor storage areas are considered to be a sales lot (retail <br />merchandise display). <br />U. 20.4 Parking spaces. – Add – Required parking spaces may be 9’ x 18’ where the access aisle is 24’ <br />or more in width. <br />V. 20.4.1 Automotive Dealerships are allowed commercial driveways of up to 36’ wide to accommodate <br />the transport trucks, garbage trucks, parts delivery semi-trucks, etc. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission should review the proposed language for this new building type template and <br />determine if the proposed language is appropriate. <br /> <br />Amendment Process <br />Ord. No. 131, Section 17.6 covers the process to consider amendments to the ordinance. Section 17.6.4.1 notes <br />that only amendments that meet one of the following should be considered: <br />1. A mistake has been made in the original zoning which was inconsistent with the Comprehensive <br />Municipal Plan adopted by the city which should now be corrected; or <br />2. Substantial changes have occurred within the city since the adoption of the Comprehensive <br />Municipal Plan which changes should result in an amendment of both the zoning and the Comprehensive <br />Municipal Plan; or <br />3. There shall exist a clear public need for a benefit to be derived from the proposed zoning which <br />shall be greater than any benefit or convenience of the property owners. <br />4. Beyond a public need being evident, the application shall show that the public interest would be <br />best served by rezoning the property in question and that the property in question is the best qualified to <br />serve said public need; or <br />5. In the case of “down zoning” which would diminish the intensity of the current use to a less <br />intensive use, the proposed zoning shall allow the property owners a reasonable use of their property <br />under the terms of this ordinance as well as serve the public interest.’ <br /> <br />Criteria #2 and #3 may apply to the applicant’s request. The proposed building type template can be used for new <br />or redevelopment of other sites in the Gateway District, such as the Ford dealership across Highway 61 or the <br />3700 Highway 61 property also owned by the applicant. The proposed designs from the applicant show a <br />decrease in impervious surface coverage, an increase in landscaping, new lighting, and a modern building <br />compared to the current site; the proposed building template would require other automotive dealerships to <br />adhere to the same standards. <br /> <br />Section 17.6.4.2 includes criteria to review for amendments to the ordinance , with the Planner’s findings in italics. <br />1. Adjacent Uses. <br />a. The proposed use on the applicant’s property would not change, so there is no expected <br />change of impacts to adjacent uses. The proposed landscaping and site design would <br />provide more of a buffer between the applicant’s properties and their neighbors than the <br />current site. <br />2. Air and Water Quality.