Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Memorandum <br />To: Gem Lake Planning Commission Project Reference: Variance – 1201 County Rd E <br />Copies To: Marnie McPherson, Applicant <br /> Robbie Latta, Contractor TKDA Project No.: 21076.000 <br />From: Evan Monson, Planner Client No.: <br /> <br />Date: August 29, 2024 <br /> <br /> <br />SUBJECT: A 16.8-foot Variance request to construct an accessory structure (shed) within the side <br />yard setback <br /> <br />MEETING DATE: September 10, 2024 <br /> <br />LOCATION: 1201 County Road E East (Parcel ID 283022440006) <br /> <br />APPLICANTS: Marnie McPherson, Head of School – White Bear Montessori School <br /> <br />OWNER: White Bear Montessori School <br /> <br />ZONING: Executive Residential (RX), Institutional Overlay Zone <br /> <br />REVIEW PERIOD: 60-day period ends 10/18/2024 <br /> <br />ITEMS REVIEWED: Application and plans received on 8/19/2024 <br /> <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST <br /> <br />The White Bear Montessori School (WBMS) operates at 1201 County Road E East, at the southwest corner of the <br />city. The school is in the midst of an expansion project that started earlier this year. Building permits for the <br />project were issued by the City in April of 2024. The project includes an addition onto the existing school and <br />exterior improvements to the site. As part of the project, a 14-foot by 16-foot storage shed was constructed on the <br />south side of the property. The shed was placed at a setback of 33.2 feet from the south lot line, which is within <br />the required side yard setback of 50 feet. Prior to the new construction on the property, a storage shed of similar <br />size was located on the property, just east of the parking lot, at a setback of 62 feet from the south lot line. <br /> <br />The Building Department inspected the site and noted that the shed was within the setback from the side lot line. <br />Building Department staff notified the applicant’s contractor and noted that the two options were to move the shed <br />to a compliant setback or request a variance from the city to keep the shed in the existing location. <br /> <br />The contractor for the project stated that the shed was built in the following location for two reasons , per the <br />narrative from their submittal dated 8/15/24: <br />1. The site needs as much additional parking as possible. Construction of the shed in the as -built location <br />[within the setback] allowed 2 additional ADA parking stalls along the existing row of parking. The <br />previous shed location required the pavement space in front of the shed to be designated ‘no parking’ to <br />maintain access by garbage truck and maintenance staff. Given this issue. the decision was made to <br />move the shed location to an area not otherwise needed by additional parking. <br />2. While the pavement to the east of the existing parking lot could have been expanded to increase the <br />number of site parking stalls and provide space for the shed in compliance with the setback, the <br />watershed’s 10,000 SF of new/reconstructed impervious surface threshold for stormwater management