Laserfiche WebLink
The.current Plan cailifor cooperation with.adjacent communities to achieve compatible land development and <br />public.service..pattenls.. Should this be changed and how? <br />( 59105.5% ] Don't. Change [ 7110.1%] .Change. [`3 14.9%] No Answer <br />YOUR RECOMMENDED CHANGE(S): <br />I. Mote proactive cooperation. <br />2. Is: Vadnais Heights aware of non -cooperation? <br />3: Does Vadnais Heights respect Gem.Lake's plans? <br />4. Gem Lake should be more aggressive! <br />5; No mass transit exists in the area. <br />5. Shopping exists in all directions. <br />Please list additional. goalsyou feel are important to the future of the Gem bake. <br />1. Maintain natural barriers. <br />2. Oppose LaBore Road extension. <br />3, Propose County E as.boulevard. <br />4. Deal with County E traffic. <br />5. Trail around Gern Lake. Park with balifield and ice rink. <br />6. No further subdivision of land. <br />T. Continue passive/rural character. <br />8. Encourage LaBore.Road extension. <br />9. Minimize development. <br />10. Maintain low density. <br />11. Improve, County E <br />12. Reduce: Goose: Lake Road traffic. <br />13: Maintain low profile government. <br />1.4. Maintain open spaces. <br />15. Slow all traffic in city. <br />16. Get acknowledgement of our rustic setting from surrounding communities. <br />17. Require residential property maintenance. and removal of junk:piles in yards, <br />1.8. Improve 1001 communication with residents from government, <br />19, Provide free. copies of ordinances to residents: <br />20. Add city sewer. <br />21. Reduce:regulation.i <br />22. improve city employee and volunteer. training. <br />23. Provide. regular contact list, <br />24.. No low income; public. or multi -family housing. <br />2 <br />