Laserfiche WebLink
I. On Nov 5, voters will lie asked <br />to approve a bond referendum. <br />The bond referendum would support a <br />facilities plan developed from the district's <br />strategic plan, mission and beliefs that: <br />• Accommodates projected enrollment <br />growth <br />• Provides safe, secure Et healthy learning <br />environments for all students through <br />investments in our aging facilities and <br />infrastructure <br />• Increases opportunities for students by <br />Creating a "new" single, unified grade <br />9-12 high school <br />• Creates flexibly -designed learning spaces <br />to support student -centered instruction <br />A successful bond referendum would allow <br />the district to implement a comprehensive <br />facilities plan that encompasses all district <br />{ )uildings and addresses questions that have <br />oeen asked in the community for decades. <br />c The comprehensive plan <br />resulted from cornmunity <br />conversations. <br />The Facilities Plan is the result of a nearly <br />yearlong facilities planning process that <br />included a 90-member Facilities Planning <br />Committee composed of parents, staff and <br />community members. <br />4. The average age of distr , <br />i• -jo vvFirs,. <br />The oldest building was built in 1918 and <br />the newest building was built in 2006. <br />. A successful bond referendum <br />would address students' needs <br />For years to come. <br />If voters approve the bond referendum <br />on November 5, district facilities would <br />accommodate the Strategic Plan, projected <br />enrollment growth, safety and security <br />improvements, aging facilities and deferred <br />maintenance needs, and the future of <br />�ducationat programming. <br />ON NOVEMBER 5, RESIDENTS WILL VOTE WHETHER our Future <br />TO APPROVE A BOND REFERENDUM FOR SCHOOL NEEDS. <br />NOV. 5 <br />6. Failure to approve the <br />bond referendum would result <br />If the bond does not pass, projected <br />enrollment growth would lead to <br />overcrowded schools, higher class sizes, <br />and insufficient space for educational <br />and community programs. Critical safety, <br />security and maintenance needs would not <br />be addressed. The current split -campus <br />high school experience would continue. <br />Learning spaces would not receive updates <br />to support student -centered instruction. <br />7. Passa-e of the bond <br />referendum would increase <br />opportunities for students. <br />The district would be able to maintain <br />smaller class sizes and program space <br />availability with building additions. Safety, <br />security and maintenance needs would <br />be addressed. More of our high school <br />students would be able to better access <br />robust course options including college and <br />career offerings, make connections with <br />each other and staff members, and benefit <br />from personalized and flexible learning <br />experiences. <br />8. ISD 624 is a good steward <br />of the community's investment <br />ISD 624 routinely finds innovative solutions <br />to live within its means. <br />• The district has a AA bond rating, <br />which we have received from S&P's every <br />year the district has applied since 2010. <br />• Our district received excellence in <br />financial reporting awards from both <br />the Assn. of School Business Officials <br />and Government Finance Officers Assn. <br />for 19 consecutive years. <br />9. Now is the time for investment. <br />Due to smart fiscal management and old <br />debt being paid off, this comprehensive <br />district -wide plan can be accomplished with <br />a $326 million bond referendum, which <br />results in a tax impact of about $23 per <br />month for the average homeowner. A tax <br />calculator tool is available at the district's <br />website, www.isd624.org/Bond2019. <br />10. The Facilities <br />Committee discussed various <br />HS options such as: <br />• keep the status quo of a split high school, <br />complete extensive renovations to both <br />buildings <br />• expand North Campus to become the <br />district's "new" single 9.12 high school, <br />move current Sunrise Park Middle <br />School to South Campus location <br />• build a brand new high school, leave <br />remaining district buildings as -is <br />HS S <br />11. The high school plan <br />would work with existing <br />district property. <br />A "new" single, unified grade 9-12 high <br />school could be built on the existing <br />property already owned by the district. <br />The district would consider purchasing <br />neighboring homes from interested sellers <br />if expansion made sense. The Board will <br />not use eminent domain. <br />The district's student enrollment <br />numbers are strong, with continued <br />residential growth projected throughout <br />the district in the next decade. <br />The district's new Strategic Plan is <br />guiding the work of our district and <br />schools, prioritizing student agency and <br />access, engagement and support, and <br />respect of diversity of people and ideas. <br />n %F Y0110 Ii.sd624 <br />