Laserfiche WebLink
WATER GREMLIN PUB11C HEALTH ASSESSMENT <br />I�V <br />Findings <br />Cancer: incidence describes the rates and number of newly diagnosed cancers over a specified <br />time period. Table 1 shows the observed and expected numbers of cases for all cancers <br />combined and for the most frequent types of cancer among males in the five census tracts inthe <br />area of analysis. The observed -to -expected ratios and statistical 959'a confidence intervals are <br />also shown. Table 2 provides the same information for females. The same ratios a,nd confidence <br />intervals are also shown graphically in Figure 1 and Fiau re: 2 for males and females, respectively. <br />For all cancers combined overthe 10-year period 2007-2016, there Were no significant <br />differences between the.observed and expected.. n u m bers of cancers (based on Metro.area <br />rates) for males or for females. For males, there were 471 newly diagnosed cancers versus 478 <br />expected cancers (ratio of 0.98.). For females, there Were 499 observed cancers compared to 500 <br />expected cancers (ratio of 1.00). For both genders combined, there were 970 newly.diagnosed <br />cancers over the 10=year time period, compared to the expected number of 978 for an overall <br />ratio of 0199: In short, the overall cancer rate. In five census tracts in the area of analysis is <br />virtually identical to the Metro area. rate. <br />Strengths and Limitations <br />The major strength of this analysis is the use of data from the MCRS to examine and compare <br />cancer incidence rates, All newly diagnosed cancers among Minnesota residents are reported to <br />the MCRS. MCRS data has been shown to meet the. highest standards of data completeness and <br />accuracy. Examining rates of newly diagnosed cancers provides the, most detailed and complete <br />profile of cancer occurrence among Minnesota residents statewide. <br />Detailed population data (18 age categories'for each gender) for the requested census tracts <br />were required to determine the expected.nurnber of new. can cers. Data from 2010 United States. <br />Census were used to provide an approximate population distribution for the ten year time <br />period. There are`fluctuations in populations.over time but the US census is the most accurate <br />accountof the population. MCRS data are available at the census tract [eveI which correspond <br />exactly with the population data. <br />While this study provides a relatively clear picture of overall cancer.incidence among these <br />residents living in the area of analysis, the picture is much less stable or informative for many <br />specific types of cancer due to. the small numbers of cases at a community level. Thisproblem <br />was partially overcame by aggregating cancer data over a ten year period. <br />Finally; these.cancer.data represent the occurrence of cancer among people who lived in the <br />community at the time of diagnosis (cancer incidence) during the period 2007-2016. However, <br />the time period for the development of cancer (latency period) is typically several decades. <br />Many cancers diagnosed today are possibly due to exposures and lifestyle experiences that <br />began or occurred. many years ago. As in any community, there will be migration from one <br />neighborhood to another as well as migration into and out of these communities over time. <br />DIC <br />