My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022 05-17 CC PACKET
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2020 - 2026
>
2022
>
2022 05-17 CC PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2026 8:06:06 AM
Creation date
1/8/2026 7:57:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 05000
Document
CITY COUNCIL PACKETS
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATER GREMLIN PUB-LIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT <br />directions may varyfrom the regional groundwaterflow direction, There. is little information regarding <br />local grou ndwater flow directions in the area (if .the Water Gremlin property. Monitoring wells. in the. <br />buried sand aquifer are needed to deterrnine the local flow direction in this important aquifer. <br />Flow direction 1n the very shallow groundwater (less than 30 feet) is likely to be influenced by <br />topography, nearby su rface waters, and precipitation. For example;. near Lambert Creek, the shallow <br />groundwater may discharge into the creek part of the year and at other times surface water from the <br />creek may flow outward into the: shallow glacial deposits. <br />Since June 2019, there have been five phases of groundwater investigations on and near the Water <br />Gremlin property: These have generally started at areas of known or suspected releases of site -related <br />contaminants and expanded outward to define the horizontal and vertical extent:of the contamination <br />and to evaluate potential releases to nearby surface waters. Investigations in 2019 and 2020 focused on <br />shallow groundwater with borings 50.feet.below the groundsurface or less, although six borings were <br />drilled deeper (70-100 feet deep) to sample water in the buried sand aquifer. In 2021, additional <br />borings were drilled on and.;offthe Water Gremlin property to. evaluate the water quality in the. buried <br />sand aquifer. The results of the first four investigations are described in detail in the site reports (Wenck, <br />2019b, 20201 2021) and summarized here. MPGA provided the analytical results of the 2021 <br />investigation to MDH, but a site investigation report was not available at tiie time this document -was <br />written. <br />Trichlproethylene: As shown in Figure 5, TCE was detected at most of the boring locations on the north. <br />campus property atconcentrations above.the M.D.H Health Risk. Limit (HRL) of0.4 pp (parts per billion, <br />which is the.;same as micrograms per liter). A HRL represents an amount of a contarninarit that poses <br />little or.no health risk to those'drinking the water daily for a lifetime, including sensitive or highly <br />exposed people. The highest concentration detected.was.189 pp.b, with the greatest concentrations <br />found beneath or near the. Water Gremlin plant building. TCE was not detected. in borings near the north <br />side of Lambert Creek or in borings on the south campus...TCE also was not detected to the north, west, <br />or northeast of the. Water Gremlin plant. This suggests. that TCE may have a somewhat limited extent in <br />the shallow groundwater. TCE has not been detected to date in any samples collected from the buried <br />sand.aquifer. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.