Laserfiche WebLink
WATER GREMLIN PUBLIC H.EA.LTH A.SS:ESSMENT: PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT <br />Ix. Responding to Community Concerns <br />Over the course of three years, MDH staff coordinated and collaborated with many partners and <br />stakeholders to engage community members that live near and are concerned about environmental <br />releases from the Water Gremlin facility: These collaborations included state agencies (mainly the MPCA <br />and Department of Labor and Industry),. county public health, city and #ownship government, and <br />community advocates. <br />ManychanneIs for communication were established arid used for various audiences and different topics. <br />A general email address a.nd phone line were widely promoted as.a mechanism for the. public to contact <br />MDH about this site. Calls a.nd.ema1Is were logged,.shared with partners as needed to develop <br />responses, and used to identify topics of growingconcern to be addressed by communication:and <br />outreach efforts.a.nd.produets. in a year's time starting on) anuary 31, 2019, MDH staff recorded 13.3 <br />inquiries from individuals concerned about the site, Staff acid partners attended several, large <br />community -wide meetings, met with selected audiences and, local officials on many occasions, and <br />participated in regular meetings with an advocacy group (the Neighborhood Concerned. Citizens Group <br />[NCCG]) over the course of.severa1 years thus. far. To.offer opportunities for community members to ask <br />their questions.more.d1rectl.y and privately, MDH and MPCA staffheld a series of listening sessions at <br />different. locations. in the area. Translated materials (in Hmong, Spanish, Karen, and Somali) were <br />provided to ensure company employees.had access to understandable information. <br />News media coverage and interviews with community members provided further examples of <br />questions, comments, and concerns expressed by people who wanted to know if or believed.their health <br />was affected in ways thatwere.or could. be attributable.to contaminants from the site. MDH also <br />responded to questions.frorn health care providers about health effects of TCE inhalation and.the <br />advisability of seeking testingfo.r patients. The following lists; organized by whether the issues.are <br />addressed in the PHA document or beyond its scope, summarize the main categories of topics and gives <br />examples of the questions, requests, and comments communitymembers .shared . <br />A. Community Inquiries <br />Topics addressed in. this document <br />• Biological testing: How to -get tested to assess exposure to TCE; inquiries about and requests for <br />community -level screening for such exposure, <br />• Health studies: Requests for health effects surveil[ance in the surrounding community; requests for <br />health studies to assess. the.consequences of site contaminants in the community; questions about <br />the Minnesota Cancer Reporting System:data for the community. <br />Health effects, Reports of symptoms or diagnosed health problems (various cancers,.skin irritation, <br />asthma, etc.) --usually accompanied by questioningWhether effects could be caused by anything <br />released from the.faciIity; requests for explanation of potential risk for and type of health effects <br />possible for people living atspecific [ocations.during spec.ific:time periods; requests for information <br />or'advice .about health concerns from and among former Water Gremlin employees or their family <br />members. <br />• Environmental ..contamination. Requests for more detailed accounting of how much TCE was <br />released to air and when; requests forinformation about how much TCE (or tDCE) was present.in air <br />at specific locations and times;. questions about potential impact of airborne TCE on the so![ and <br />46 <br />