Laserfiche WebLink
WATER GREMLIN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT- PUBLIC COMMENT GRAFT <br />Monitoring for lead in.outdoor air on the.Water Gremlin property began in September 2019.and <br />indicates lead emissions are; and. have been, well below the National Ambient.Air quality Standard of <br />O.i. µg/m5 set by the U.S,. EPA to protect public health. Lead emissions are expected to deposit to the <br />ground :near WaterGrem[in's facility. MD.H's Blood Lead Information System (BLIS) database was <br />queried and confirmed rates of elevated blood lead for children in zip code 55110 did not differ <br />significantly from a comparison area, suggesting the Community was not exposed to harmful. amounts of <br />lead from:. facility air emissions. <br />Next Steps/Recommendations: MDH recommends that MPCA continue to closely evaluate air emissions <br />from Water Grem lin's.facility and ensure adherence to the new.air permit when it is final. MDH will <br />continue to monitor new toxicological information for t-DCE to ensure the MDH air Risk Assessment <br />Advice is protective of public health. <br />Conclus.ion.3: Groundwater contam1nation.is not. expected to harm people's health <br />Basis for Conclusion 3: Municipal -drinking water in White Bear Lake and White Bear Township is not <br />affected by Water.Gremlin groundwater contamination. 1;4-13ioxane was detected below the MDH HRL <br />in m.u.nicipaI wells in Vadnais Heights, from an unknown source. There are private we] 1s in Gem Lake <br />contaminated with 1;4-dioxane above.MDH's HRL, but the concentrations of 1,4-dioxane are low and <br />not expected. to result in health effects. Households with wells with 1,4-dioxane concentrations. <br />exceeding the HRL have been notified.and are provided bottledwaterto limit exposure, The source of <br />the Gem Lake contamination is also unknown. <br />Nex.t Steps/Recommendations: Water Gremlin is responsible foe defining the extent and magnitude of <br />the groundwater contamination from releases or threatened releases from their facility. MDH <br />recommends MPCA.continue to investigate the source of the 1,4-dioxa.ne groundwater contamination <br />found in Gem Lake private wells and the. Vadnais Heights municipal wells. MPCA and MDH will continue <br />to sample private.wells and provide bottled water ms .needed to well owners with contamination above <br />the HRLfor 1,4-dioxane. <br />Conclusion:4: Soil vapor contaminat"ion is nota risk at. properties.near Water Gremlin:. <br />Basis. for Conclusion 4: TCE and t-DCE Were found at high levels in soil vapor.beneath th6 Water Gremlin <br />facility and.a mitigation system was. installed to protect workers. Soil vapor sampling around the facility <br />show that high levels of vapors are not migrating to neighboring homes. <br />Conclusion 5: Soil, sediment, ands urface water contamination from Water Gremlin does not pose a. <br />health risk to the community. <br />Basis for Conclusion S: The areas of soil contamination at Water Gremlin have been defined and are <br />limited to the. company's.property..Water Gremlin operations have contributed to lead concentrations <br />in sediments, particularly in samples from wetlands nearest the facility to the east and southeast. There <br />is expected to be little to no human exposure to the lead in these sediments: Water Gremlin operations <br />have contributed to lead and 1;4-dioxane in stormwater porids.and other surface waters on the <br />company's property, but there is expected. to be little to no human exposure to these surface water <br />bodies. Currently, there is.not enough Ihformation:to determine whether past transport of 1,4-dioxane <br />in surface water may have contaminated the groundwater. <br />51 <br />