My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022 08-08 CC PACKET
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2020 - 2026
>
2022
>
2022 08-08 CC PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2026 8:17:23 AM
Creation date
1/8/2026 8:11:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 05000
Document
CITY COUNCIL PACKETS
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Questions: What.steps can a municipality take to regulate the :sale of. edible THC. <br />ANALYSIS <br />In 2022 the Minnesota State Legislature adopted .changesto Minn .Stat. Sec.1,51.72 concerning sale certain <br />canttabinoid products, specifically edible THC. The statute was amended to resolveambiguities. in:the prior statute. <br />As of July], 2022 it is now1egal.to sell edibles containing THC,: as well -as THC.irifused beverages. F'orlhepurpose <br />of this memoraIldum THC infused ptbducts will be.referred to as "CBD Products'. The statute doesn't grant a <br />municipality the. power.to regulate the:manufacture, distribution,. or sale of CBP products: On the other hand, the. <br />statute doesn't prohibit. a municipality from regulating CBD products. <br />I raise this point because municipalities are creatures of statute. They only have those powers which the legislature <br />either expressly grants or*aie..*granted by implication. In addition, if the State is already regulating an.:act ivity;:the <br />iunicipality can't adopt regulations which conflict with :the State. regulations: The statute does forbid adding CBD <br />to candy -and snack food prdducts.:And the Alcohol and Gambling:Enforcemerit.Division of the Minnesota <br />Department Qf'Public Safety has informed the League ofMinnesota Cities that products: containing CBD, hemp or <br />THC are not allowed .to lie.sold .at exclusive liquor stores.'The reason being is that Minn. Star: Sec 340A.412 subd. <br />i 4 lists the products liquor stores are. allowed to soil. And CBD, hemp' or THC infused products aren't listed. And <br />the statute forbids -safe to anyone youngerthan. L Beyond tbese.prohibitions Minn. Stat Sec..151..72. is silent.as, to <br />how the sale of CBD products will be regulated. <br />One-m6thod that has been discussed is to regulate sale'of CB0 Oibducts in the same manner as tobacco products. <br />For example; sale of either tobacco products or:CBD products:to a -person under the age of21 is -prohibited. If a <br />municipal ity elects.to regulate CBD: products -in the same -manner as tobacco it should do to under a separate <br />Winance. Again, there is the. problem I have already raised. The lack statutory langua$e. dealing with sale of CBD <br />products. There is a strong possibility that.an.Ordinance creating such regulations would be challenged oti.the basis <br />that the.municipality lacks the statutory authority to adopt such.regulations. The municipalitywauld.have tQ.rely on <br />itspolice. power to protect health and. safety. <br />Another method of regulation which has been diseussed.is regulation through zoning. This is a method f believe. <br />holds more:.pramise. Minn. Stat462.358 Subd. la authorizes a municipality to.adopt land use controls to protect. <br />publ.ie.health.,safety and general w.elfare..Manufacturing; ,distribution and sale:of CBD products is clearly a.public <br />health, and safety concern: No one wants a:store.selling CBD products next to a school. Creating a special zone. or <br />conditional. use would allow a municipality to control manufacturing;, distribution and sale.of CBD products. <br />Adult entertainment and.book:stores are already controlled. Why not create:. similar controls for C.BID products. Such <br />an action is clearly allowed under Minn. Stat Sec. 462.3 58. And it avoids the problem of lack. of statutory authority <br />under Minn. State. Sec.151,72. <br />Land:use.regulatiott.allows.a municipality to exercise. its authority under Minn. State Sec: 462.355-Sulid. 4. Under <br />the provisions of Subd,4 a:munic'ipal'stj+ pars adopt a moratorium prohibiting manufacturing,.dittributioft:or sal$ of <br />CBD products for up to a year while studies are conducted. it is my understanding that the: City o.f Stillwater has <br />:adopted such an Ordinance. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The lack of a statutory framework- for regulation of. CBD.products:is a cbrtcern. While CBD infused alcoholic <br />products and food products'appeorslo be: dealt with. The lack ofregulation cbncerniing sale of othei -fortis of edible <br />CBD products is concerning.: Use of a municipality's power to. control land use appears to be the bot method.of <br />controlling sale. of CBD products. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.