Laserfiche WebLink
Attached is an article I came across reiating-ta THC and the .City of Richfield's pending .moratorium. <br />. <br />While Richfield appears to1e-leaning in a similar direction that Gem Lake may ultimately follow,. the <br />article does give soine background as to where this sudden interest came from. One consequence of <br />sitting back and observing other cities' approaches:.is what is sometimes called the paralysis of analysis. <br />There are some ideas presented in the article we.ipay wish to explore. <br />L Delta 8 TJiC is already readily Available, A Goggle seatch identified a shop in St. Paul thatsells <br />Delta 8 THC. <br />2. We should get'our arms around both Delta-8 and Delta 9 so nothing slips through the cracks: <br />3. Richfield's, city manager is quoted.regarding possibly embedding Tf iC into. their zoning <br />ordinance, presumably as apermitted use for a.commercial district. But what -about home, <br />occupations? Derrâ–º Lake may consider.. adding Delta 8 (and Delta 9) as a regulated home. <br />occupation, or prevent sales of either Delta 8 or 9.8 an excluded type of home occupation. <br />4. Regulate sales per the state law. Buyers must be 21 dh6older;,produets.of not more that 5mg each <br />or packages containing nomore. than 50mg. <br />5. Restrict.sal:es to gas stations and smoke shops (or it least write such. restrictions into both our <br />consolidated land.use ordinance. and.Ordi.nanceb8, tobacco.). <br />6: Should we add THC onto our business license- application so to -flag-it to potential vendors as well <br />as helping Gem Lake know where it might be sold? <br />7. In Any case, we should keep it simple acid straightforward and make it easy for potential. vendors <br />to find. in our ordinances,. <br />Just some -thoughts; but it would be nice to see Gem Lake. at the forefront of local goverrimeitt's response <br />and not just sittingby to see what others might do. <br />Jim Lindner <br />