2017 11-21 CC PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

j was done in 2016) over the benefiting area results in a. per acre water main assessment of. $1U72.73. Similarity assessing 100% of sanitary sewer extension cost of $09,550 over the benefiting area of 8.89. acres results ina per acre cost. of $7,823.40.. As part of the 2009 Scheun.eman Road improvement, the City assessedfive parcels in the current project limits for street improvements. at that time. Those parcels have been excluded from street assessments. for the proposed improvements and that share of street assessments is included as a City cost. Currently the two northern parcels on the east. side.of Scheuneman Road. have sanitary sewer service via. the MCES sanitary sewer interceptor that runs parallel to the railroad tracks along the east side of these parcels. Since these lots currently have sewer service; assessing them for the extension of the new sanitary sewer main in Scheunerrian Road may not be possible. Consistent with City policy, 1.00% of the street irnproyements costs will be assessed. For this project and similar to the 2009 S.cheuneman Road improvements,. the street improvements will be assessed on a front foot basis. There is approximately 2,657 front footage in the project area: The street and storm sewer costs studied in this report are estimated. to cost $617,240.. Assessing 100% of that costover2,657 frontfeet.equates to a front foot assessment of $232.31 per front foot. A preliminary assessment roll is included in this report in Appendix B. We would recommend an appraiser or assessment.professional.be. included in the projectat an early stage to determine the assesshient amaunts1hat may be reasonably applied to each property, based on benefit. 9 Proposed Schedule The following schedule lists the steps and schedule the City will need to follow to construct the improvements outlined in Phis report during 201.8: I Item Date. Council Authorized .Feasibility Report. ............ ........... September 19; 2017 Council Receives Feasibility Report ................................................................ November 21, 2017 Council Orders Improvement Hearing ............................................. .......... November 21, 2017 Public Improvement Hearing ............... ,............................... :.:...:................... :..... December 19, 2017 Council Authorized Preparation of Plans and Specifications .......................... December 19, 2017 Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Orders A1dvertisement for Bids.... ......................... ................... :.................... March 20, 2018 Open Bids. ................................................ April 2018 Accept Bids. and. -Award Project ............................................ :................. :......... ........... April 17, 2018 Project Construction ........... ............................................. .............. May 22, 2018. Assessment Hearing .......:....... May -October 2018 10 Conclusions and Recommendations 10.1 Candusions From the results of our study, we conclude that: 0 The proposed improvements are necessary to provide adjacent parcels. with potable water and flows capable for fire protection and with sanitary sewer service. • The: proposed street.and drainage improvements are necessary to maintain the City`s infrastructure. The project is feasible and cost effective from end.engineering standpoint. FEASIBILITY STUDY GEMLK 143869 Page 6