Laserfiche WebLink
9:9 <br />accordance with the requirements of Section 9.7.3. Proposals under this Section 9.8 irrvohing more than one lot shall <br />comply with Section 9.7:3.(C). Single -lot proposals must iindicate design incorporating the.requirements of 9.7.3(C), but <br />only must build the improvements when -the adjacent lots on. the: same side of the right-of-way also have built such <br />improvements or have been approved for construction.undei this Section. <br />9.8.4 Evaluatiori of Incentives: Any incentives caseated by the City Council .and in effect at the time of development <br />application may be sought by the applicant. The incentive items and allowances, and their effect on. the overall <br />development plan, shall be approved by the City Council, unless specifically delegated tivit.hin the ordinance creating the <br />applicable incentive. The request for. incentive approval does .not require City Council approval of the entire plan. The <br />Zoning Administrator shall confer with at least one City consultant, as. directed by ordinance .or :at the Adz iinistrato>'s <br />best discretion, in order toevaluate the proposed incentives and niake recommendations to the approving authority, If <br />incentives are applied. for, the applicant:and Zoning Administrator shall reach agreement on the applicatioxi of incentives <br />prior tosubmitting. the application to the Planning Cvii-anission. If any applied -for incentives are.. recommended for <br />rejection, the applicant may elect to re -submit portions of the plans to incorporate the recommendation without <br />incutring.new application fees; the applicant electing to re -submit plans shall submit a written statement agreeing: to an <br />extension .of applicable tirneiines under Minn. Stat. § 15.99, Minn, Star. 5 46.2.358, and other applicable. laws and <br />ordinances. The extension request shall be. indefinite; .the City shall process .the resubmitted. materials within .the <br />timelines specified b":law, treating the date .of re -submission as the first day of any applicable time period. <br />9.8.5.Administrative. Approval. If the application satisfies. all applicable criteria, the Zoning Administrator: shall approve <br />the Zoning Compliance Permit. The applicant shall. execute a Development Agreement with the City prior to the: receipt <br />of any 1_iuilding permit. kinder the plan. <br />OnStreeflparking, r1, er.diagonal (angled} or par a3l.be <br />icated on t1whor . &fare standar4s54t Figures��}yand 3 e <br />be fvxwar os .rev Sa~r �* a rls spaces o ex .tha °Ina <br />ng to t s li sr l . <br />ail no Wider `than S eer. Plans fo���w. emO in <br />tharau hf es and c%vc spaces t'`''avide a s taut orhv <br />g,:. s <br />Parkin Wcoifiun 1 /F,` <br />�ia£ a mile. of "wild :entrance ma <br />provi cdalong all streets other thAUUeys.. Parking <br />-e angle''''arking is permitted or xeq V' d, the parking <br />udica:'gcs. ` ;oil thorou hfaes and on- ate <br />ent an,, er major, subdivisions.aMencouraged to <br />tkof the irking. required for plann stiuildings..On <br />?applip tward that building's appl cable parking <br />9.9..2 .A parking plan shall be included for .all buildings, indicatinghow the parking. requirement for.each proposed <br />building is met through .on -street parking,: shared .off-street parking or dedicated off street parking. Reductions in the. <br />number of spaces required by the Building Type regulations: may be approved if the proposal is supported by :parking <br />study specific .to the proposed building($) and likely tenants. Sharedparking..proposals. are encouraged and should <br />reference the Urban Land.lnstitute'.s Shared Parking Guidelines .or similar guidance.. Plans including off,street parking <br />and loading facilities. widen the Gateway District shall be. reviewed by the City Engineer and City Planner. If, upon <br />review, either consultant determines that an alternative to the proposed parking plan is desirable, it will recommend an <br />alternate^parkiiag plan to the Planning Commission -Which shall make a recorfanendationto the City .Coumcil: for .final. <br />review and approval.. <br />9.9.3. The Planning. Commission may recommend and the City Council may require a contribution of land or money <br />toward.communityparking facilities in lieu of providing off-street parking facilities on the property to be developed. <br />9.:9.4 On-giade.parking areas.within lots are prohibited within any front yard setback or in front of the principal building - <br />On -grade parking areas shall be located at the side or the rear of buildings in.tnid-block areas, and may not be located <br />within 50 feet of the intersection of any public streets. (excluding Alleys). Parking areas shall be landscaped in accordance <br />with the Gem Lake Landscaping Ordinance. <br />9.9.5 Reduction ofimpervious. surfaces through the use of:interlockingpavexs or similar materials is strongly encouraged <br />for areas that serve low impact parking needs; such. as remote parking lots, parking areas for periodic.uses:and parking <br />m natural amenity areas. <br />9.9.6 Bicycle Parking, parking plans shall include:designed space and facilities for bicycle parking, at a ratio of 1 Bicycle <br />parking space .for each. 4 residential units. or 20 required automobile spaces. Bicycle parking facilities shall be located <br />updated .Irene 5, 2017 Geni Lake Consolidated Land Use: Ordinance --.Page 55 <br />