My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013 06-19 CCP
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2010 - 2019
>
2013
>
2013 06-19 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2026 8:54:59 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 8:53:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
AGENDA PACKETS
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Clifton LarsonAl len <br />op, <br />CliftonLarsonAllen LLP <br />www.d iftonlarsonallen.com <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br />Honorable Mayor, Members of the <br />City Council, and Citizens <br />City of Gem Lake, Minnesota <br />We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of <br />America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards <br />issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental <br />activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information <br />of the City of Gem Lake, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, and the related notes to the <br />financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued <br />our report thereon dated June 18, 2013. <br />The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions covers seven categories of <br />compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public <br />indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. <br />In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City of <br />Gem Lake, failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for <br />Political Subdivisions. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of <br />such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have <br />come to our attention regarding the City of Gem Lake's noncompliance with the above -referenced <br />provisions. <br />The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of <br />that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not <br />suitable for any other purpose. <br />Clifton LarsonAl len LLP <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />June 18, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.