Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF GEM LAKE, MN <br />4200 Otter Lake Road <br />Gem Lake, MN 5,5110-3227 <br />Telephone 6-1-747-2790 <br />F,-mail ('M « f—'cmlakeNl\.OI- <br />Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting <br />6 April 2010 <br />The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of Gem Lake was called to <br />order by Chairman Craig Rafferty on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at 7.00 p m in the <br />Gem Lake City Hall conference room. <br />The following members were present: Chairman Craig Rafferty, Planning <br />Commission members Beth Herzog, and Dan Marier. <br />APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MEETING MINUTES <br />Planning Commission Agenda: Chairman Rafferty asked for any changes, <br />deletions or added agenda items- None was given, so proceeded to move <br />forward with the meeting <br />Planning Commission Minutes: Chairman Rafferty called to approve the <br />March Planning Commission meeting minutes. The March Planning Commission <br />minutes were discussed and some corrections were needed. Upon motion by <br />Commissioner Marier and seconded by Chairman Rafferty. The March minutes <br />were approved with corrections. Ayes — 2, Nays — 0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Four Seasons CUP Changes: Chairman Rafferty told the Planning <br />Commission that the amendments were made and were presented to the City <br />Council and passed at the March City Council meeting <br />Hansen Property (West of Daniels Farm Road): The Daniel Farms Road <br />Association was present at the meeting wanting to know the status on the <br />development of the Hansen property. Chairman Rafferty explained that there was <br />some interest from a developer for three story building with a pitched roof and a <br />senior single level assisted living with a zero lot line and also single level senior <br />living. The development is residential in nature. The Planning Commission has <br />made it clear to the developer that the Daniels Farm Road is not available for use <br />with this development if it goes forward. The concerns from the nine resident <br />properties along the Hansen property are opposed to any height variation to be <br />built on that land. The question was raised on how the city would pay for the <br />