Laserfiche WebLink
July 6, 2010 <br />Memo for Gem Lake City Council <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />1 do not view the installation of a beach sand layer as "storage" of material, just as we commonly <br />don't view spread -out mulch in plant beds or pea gravel on walkways as "stored." The material <br />is being put to use. Additionally, the stated restriction is limited to preventing the storage of <br />materials "intended for the creation of compost," which would not apply to a beach sand blanket. <br />Since it's my opinion that the sand layer is not a "structure," there is no other restriction in <br />Shoreland Zone 2 which would alter the generally applicable R-1 zoning rules.I My opinion, as <br />stated above, is that the beach is a permitted accessory use on an R-1 property. <br />2. What Procedural Requirements Apply in this Situation? <br />Either the landowner or the contractor needed to obtain a grade & fill permit prior to installing <br />this beach sand layer. Section 21.6.3 of the Shoreland chapter mandates a City plan review and <br />permit before any grading, filling and excavating or changing the topography can take place. <br />There is no stated de minimis exception to this requirement; there is also no minimum -volume <br />exception to grade & fill permit requirements under the Building Code. Gem Lake's grade & fill <br />permit schedule begins at 400 cubic yards, as that is the threshold for a "land reclamation" <br />conditional use permit under Section 16.10.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. As I noted in the facts, it <br />does not appear that there is anywhere near 400 cubic yards of material involved in either job (at <br />6" depth, the beach would need to cover 2400 square yards to use 400 cubic yards of sand). The <br />rates applicable to a 400 cubic yard installation would apply to any required application <br />involving less than that amount. The authority for a grade & fill permit comes from the building <br />code, meaning that it is not a discretionary permit, or conditional permit. if the applicant <br />produces the required documentation, and the work is permitted in the zoning district, the <br />applicant is entitled to the permit. <br />The other stated "prior approval" requirements from the Shoreland chapter do not apply to this <br />work in Shoreland Zone 2, given my reading of the restrictions (again, assuming no vegetation <br />was cut or removed for the project). Similarly, the DNR regulation's requirement of local <br />notification would appear not to apply when the beach does not require putting fill material on <br />the "water" side of the accepted waterline. <br />3. What are the City's Enforcement Options? <br />The preferred option is to require the landowners to submit the material required for a Grading & <br />Filling Plan under Section 21.6.3 of the Zoning Ordinance and to pay the specified plan review <br />and permit fees. The owners must also pay the "special inspection fee" under Ordinance 78B, <br />1 This statement is made taking the owners' and landscaper's word that no vegetation was cut or removed in order to <br />install the beach sand. Clearly, if the Council makes a factual finding that vegetation was cut or removed by the <br />owner or landscaper, there would be a clear violation of the Shoreland chapter (at 21.4.1 and possibly 21.3.3) and <br />possibly DNR regulations if plants at the waterline were affected. Based on the facts as I know them, if any <br />vegetation removal took place it seems like it would have to extend into the waterline, and thus the City's first <br />enforcement option would be to report the violation to the DNR. The City's next option would involve <br />1J misdemeanor citation for failure to obtain approval and/or an order to restore vegetation beyond that "minimally <br />necessary" to allow the beach installation. <br />