My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007 11-20 CCP
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2000 - 2009
>
2007
>
2007 11-20 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2026 1:34:07 PM
Creation date
6/1/2026 1:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
AGENDA PACKET
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COMMITTEE REPORTS <br />Planning Commission November meeting report (Jim Lindner): Jim Lindner presented the November <br />planning commission meeting minutes to the council and summarized by stating that the Planning Commission <br />recommended accepting the Putman Development Guidelines, but with the knowledge that more work is anticipated <br />to be needed including new zoning ordinances. Mr. Lindner stated that the Barnett parcel was not considered in this <br />plan although probably should be looked at. The commission considered the idea of a development moratorium, but <br />was hesitant to recommend it to the council because of the negative connotation a moratorium might hold. Mr. <br />Lindner stated that he didn't think any developers would be looking at this land now because of the economy. <br />Several typos were found by Council Members. The approval of the minutes of the November Planning <br />Commission meeting will be tabled until the December 2007 City Council meeting after typos have been corrected. <br />Mr. Lindner suggested that a formal thank you be made to Tousley Ford for hosting the City of Gem Lake <br />meetings for so many years. <br />Building Committee (City Hall) report (Craig Rafferty): Mr. Rafferty reported that delays in connecting <br />water and sewer under the railroad tracks have slowed progress. However, these connections are almost completed. <br />Still need carpeting and tile. Also pipe work, electrical and lighting still left to do. Carpeting and tile work remain. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />A) RFP (Request for Proposal) - City Audit process for next 4 years: Mayor Emeott reported that he and <br />Councilor Schilling were meeting next week to review RFPs regarding an audit of the city financials. <br />B) City MS4 report for 2006 (Watson): Councilor Watson reported that he has a first draft and needs to meet <br />with Mayor Emeott to review it. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />A) Approval of payment of claims for October -November 2007: Mayor Emeott referred the Council to the <br />listing of payments requiring approval. Mayor Emeott noted that the payment to Leonard O'Brian was an attempt to <br />request a withdrawal of the Rob Hanson appeal from the first detachment annexation case in 2006. Currently this has <br />been put on hold and there has been no court date set. The council agreed that Attorney Kelly would call and check <br />the status of this in attempts to move this to resolution. <br />Mayor Emeott stated that a job description for City Clerk is currently being written. This would probably be a <br />joint position with White Bear Township as they need additional help as well. Motion by Watson, Seconded by <br />Rasmussen for approval of payment of claims for time period above was unanimously approved by voice vote. <br />B) Acceptance of November 2007 Financial Report: The city finances are low right now until the second half <br />of the tax payments are received in December. Mayor Emeott, Watson and the Gem Lake City Treasurer/White Bear <br />Township Finance Director, Jessie Hart, will be meeting to go through the budget in anticipation of the December <br />workshop. Motion by Schilling, Seconded by Artig-Swomley to accept the November 2007 Finance report was <br />unanimously approved by voice vote. <br />C) Acceptance of Putman Development Guidelines (Mark Putman): Mr. Putman reviewed his request for <br />official acceptance of the Putman Development Guidelines for land areas in the Co Rd E, Highway 61 area as <br />submitted to the council and approval of final payment for services and reports provided. He responded to questions <br />regarding building use by indicating that building uses aren't pre -determined in the Guidelines, but suggested that <br />current businesses such as Tousley Ford may wish to evolve into a more Village like feel and may even be better <br />positioned in a different location in the long term. The Guidelines provides the city with a dynamic long term vision <br />that it can use for developing a mixed -use zoning ordinance. Motion by Schilling, Seconded by Artig-Swomley for <br />official acceptance of the Putman Development Guidelines. <br />Discussion followed regarding whether a moratorium should be in place while the planning commission reviews <br />the Report and completes the city's Comprehensive Plan. The city has the flexibility to allow a variance to the <br />moratorium if a proposal was made that the council felt met all of the points outlined in the Putman Development <br />Look for us on the World Wide Web at gemlakemn.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.