My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007 11-20 CCP
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2000 - 2009
>
2007
>
2007 11-20 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2026 1:34:07 PM
Creation date
6/1/2026 1:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
AGENDA PACKET
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Guidelines. Mr. Lindner stated that while the Planning Commission recommended the acceptance of the Guidelines, <br />they could not endorse its immediate implementation at this time because further work needs to be done to create <br />new zoning ordinances. Councilor Rasmussen suggested the council accept the Guidelines and then move on to <br />further discuss how to adopt these ideas into the city. Mr. Putman stated that using the Guidelines, the city does have <br />a basis and criteria for a moratorium while these guidelines are put into zoning ordinances. Mr. Rafferty also <br />suggested that a vote of confidence by accepting the Guidelines the city could accept the Guidelines and use it for the <br />basis of planning and zoning and incorporation into the comprehensive plan. <br />The motion to accept the Putman Development Guidelines in its current form was unanimously approved by <br />voice vote. <br />D) Building Moratorium for Development areas: Mayor Emeott reminded the council that currently, if <br />someone came to the city with building plans for the four corners at Highway 61 and County Road E and met current <br />zoning criteria, the city would have to issue a building permit regardless of the work that the city has done in long <br />range planning. A 6-18 month building moratorium for this corner would allow the city to generate new zoning <br />ordinances and rules for the area to be sure that the City's new ideas for development were incorporated. Six months <br />would be the minimum recommended time and the city could choose to extend it if work was not complete. A <br />variance clause can be added to the moratorium for builders that come right on target with the Putman Development <br />Guidelines recommendations. The city could easily deny variances if they did not meet all of the requirements or <br />were less than what the city council had envisioned. <br />Discussion continued about the north east corner of Highway 61 and County Road E, which has not yet been <br />reviewed. Mr. Putman suggested the council could also include a moratorium for building on adjacent land stating <br />that development on this parcel requires mutually consistent implementation of the guidelines out outlined in the <br />Putman Development Guidelines. <br />Further discussion occurred about the fact that the Planning Commission will need help in writing zoning <br />ordinances. Recommend continue work with Putman. Mr. Putman will put together a proposal regarding continued <br />service to Gem Lake as describe in the Putman services brochure Option 9, Ordinance writing and consultation. Mr. <br />Putman again stated that the 3-D visioning option might be a good option for the city to allow residents and land <br />owners to really envision the recommendations of the Putman Development Guidelines. The review of this proposal <br />will be included in the December City Council meeting. <br />Discussion regarding the length of time the moratorium should be in effect. Various times periods were <br />considered with a final determination that nine months seemed appropriate as this is also the time period until the due <br />date of the City's comprehensive plan. <br />Motion by Artig-Swomley, Seconded Schilling for a nine (9) month building moratorium on the land as <br />described in the Putman Development Guidelines, and including the north east corner of Highway 61 and Co Road <br />E. The final wording of the moratorium will be developed by Attorney Kelly. A voice vote by individual Council <br />Member was requested by Mayor Emeott. The motion was unanimously approved with the following recorded votes: <br />Councilor Artig-Swomley — Aye <br />Councilor Schilling — Aye <br />Mayor Emeott — Aye <br />Councilor Watson — Aye <br />Councilor Rasmussen — Aye <br />E) New Building change order acceptance — Mayor Emeott reported that a rebate of $25,000 for the roofing <br />system might not materialize because the truss company were delivered different than what was specified and the <br />insulators could not get to the vaults of the roof to spray in insulation. So they had to use foam. There was much <br />discussion about if this is the responsibility of the contactor, or the truss manufacturer. The good news is that the <br />change has created a value added situation as the way the insulation is now installed; much higher R values have <br />been obtained. It was decided that the City would wait until close out of the project and final payment to negotiate <br />the details. <br />F) Snow plowing contract for winter 07-08 (Schifsky and WBT quote): Mayor Emeott has obtained two <br />bids for snow plowing for the current winter season of 2007-08. Motion by Schilling, Seconded Artig-Swomley for <br />Look for us on the World Wide Web at gemlakemn.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.