1995 12-13 PC MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

activities and acknowledgement of same as a violation; 4) the city's right to spot inspect at any time; 5) Hansen's agreement to restore proper fencing and security measures including, but not limited to, motion detectors with flood lights and alarms; 6) Hansen's agreement that any storage of "junk", unlicensed, inoperable, or otherwise objectionable vehicles represents a violation of the Special Use Permit; and 7) an understanding that Hansen be provided fourteen (14) days to resolve any violation by Boyer and that failure to resolve said violation or any second violation would result in revocation of the Special Use Permit. Upon receipt of the aforementioned application and attachments, the Commission agreed to hear the matter. Regarding the matter of Filling Permits issued to Hansen, Birkeland, Oswald, and Anderson (now Birkeland), Mr. Hansen responded that he did not know if work to be completed by 19 October 1995 was completed. Mr. Magnuson advised that RWMWD had a strong interest in the project and had agreed to monitor same. Magnuson indicated he will file a report to the Planning Commission after inquiry to RWMVVD. Regarding the matter of Vadnais Heights request that the traffic controls at the intersection of LaBore Road and County Road E be studied and a proposal be prepared by SEH at a cost in excess of $4,000 in which Gem Lake would participate at 50%, Mr. Magnuson reported that he had discussed the matter with the City Council, that Mayor Emeott has tendered a letter to Mayor Haider regarding and generally opposing the matter, and that Mr. Magnuson had discussed the matter with Vadnais Heights this day indicating: 1) an isolated study of the problem vs. a complete study of the County E/LaBore corridor was unacceptable; 2) the I-35E Corridor Study should be addressing the matter as part of it's work; 3) only one of four corners (25%) are in Gem Lake, hence participation at 50% is unacceptable. The matter was tabled. Mr. Gardner noted the changes on Lexington Parkway in St. Paul and indicated that similar conceptual work would be appropriate along County E and that the city should take a proactive approach to forming a small group to work on same. Premiminary results of the Community Survey were then discussed. Mr. Magnuson indicated final results will be available shortly and will be distributed, including Mr. Bromander at SEH. Mr. Magnuson also invited the Planning Commission along with the City Council to continue the effort by developing a similar effort targeted at Gem Lake business response. There being no further business, the Public Hearing and meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. AUTHORED: 14 November 1995 ACCEPTED: 18 December 1995 AUTHORED Freder C. agnuson, City Clerk ATTEST: David Gardner, Ch4irman file: hearings\9506dec.min