Laserfiche WebLink
GEM LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />DAVID K. GARDNER, CHM. <br />1399 E. COUNTY ROAD "E" <br />GEM LAKE, MN 55110-5231 <br />(612)429-9288 FAX 429-5034 <br />TO: ROGER BROMANDER, SEH <br />490-2150 <br />AUGUST 6, 1996 <br />HI ROGER! <br />HEREWITH SEVERAL ADDDITIONAL CHANGES TO THE MAY 1996 DRAFT YOU <br />SENT: <br />1. THE REVISED (7-9-96) DESCRIPTION OF THE "LDB" DISTRICT, PARA 3. <br />CONTAINS A REFERENCE TO RESIDENTIAL USE WHICH NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. <br />THE INTENT IS NOT TO REVERT TO THE ORIGINAL ZONING OR REMOTE SINGLE- <br />FAMILY, BUT TO PROVIDE AN OPTION OF "LIFE-CYCLE"/CONDOMINIUM-TYPE <br />CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE MAKE SOME SUGGESTIONS RE TERMINOLOGY. <br />ALSO, SAME SECTION, PARR. 5, THE SECOND SENTENCE SHOULD READ: <br />"PARKING LOTS MAY BE LIGHTED ONLY WHEN NECESSARY DURING NORMAL BUSINESS <br />HOURS" <br />2. 5.3.7 "RECREATIONAL" AREA, ADD TO THE FIRST PARAGRAPH: THIS <br />GOLF COURSE... IN THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, AND SUBSTANTIALLY ENHANCES THE <br />FEELING OF OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SO TREASURED BY THE <br />RESIDENTS OF THE CITY. <br />3. 6.2.1 ROADWAY CHANGES, PARR 3: CURRENTLY... U.S. HIGHWAY 61. <br />ALL POSSIBLE OPTIONS SHOULD BE EXPLORED TO SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCE THE <br />TRAFFIC ON SCHEUNEMAN ROAD. <br />PLEASE PROVIDE US WITH AN UPDATED DRAFT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. WE MEET <br />NEXT ON SEPTEMBER 4. <br />ALSO, TO CONFIRM OUR DISCUSSION TODAY, AND IN RESPONSE TO ROB HANSEN'S <br />REQUEST, PLEASE RESEARCH THE ISSUE OF OPEN SPACE IN OFFICE PARK <br />DEVELOPMENTS AND PROVIDE US WITH SOME SOLID IDEA OF "NORMAL" PRACTICE. <br />THANKS! <br />