My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1996 08-07 PC MINUTES
GemLake
>
PLANNING
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
PACKETS
>
1990 - 1999
>
1996
>
1996 08-07 PC MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2026 8:10:12 AM
Creation date
7/20/2026 8:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
PC PACKET
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUGGESTED THAT THIS WAS NOT THE FORUM FOR THIS DISCUSSION, THAT WE TOOK <br />HIS CONCERNS SERIOUSLY, AND ASKED BROMANDER TO DO SOME ADDITIONAL <br />RESEARCH TO DETERMINE AN ACTUAL RANGE OF GREEN SPACE IN OFFICE PARK <br />DEVELOPMENTS. <br />HANSEN THEN FOCUSED ON THE ZONING FOR TOM HANSEN'S PARCEL, <br />IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE LDB DISTRICT, AND REQUESTED JUDGMENT FROM THE <br />MC REPS AS TO THE APPROPRIATENESS OF VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IN <br />THAT LOCATION. UTTLEY RESPONDED, AGAIN, THAT LOCAL ZONING WAS NOT <br />THEIR CONCERN AND "HOUSING IS NOT A REGIONAL SYSTEM" AND, THEREFORE, <br />"NOT SUBJECT TO REVIEW" IN THIS FORMAT. THE MC DOES NOT HAVE A POLICY <br />REGARDING DENSITY. <br />THOMPSON EXCUSED HIMSELF. <br />HANSEN PERSISTED IN ATTTEMPTING TO INVOLVE UTTLEY IN A DISCUSSION <br />OF LOCAL ZONING AND I EXCUSED MYSELF. I RETURNED, BRIEFLY, TO REMIND <br />BROMANDER THAT ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION SHOULD BE BILLED TO HANSEN, NOT <br />THE CITY. <br />HANSEN PROBABLY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN THERE, BUT I WAS UNCERTAIN OF <br />THE LEGALITY. HE HAD SPOKEN WITH THOMPSON EARLIER IN THE DAY. SHOULD <br />THIS SITUATION OCCUR IN THE FUTURE, AND THE MEETING IS NOT PUBLIC (NO <br />QUORUM AND NO PUBLIC ISSSUES), I WOULD SUGGEST THE CITY OFFICIAL SIMPLY <br />TERMINATE THE MEETING. <br />IN SUMMARY, THE PLAN SEEMS TO BE ON TRACK AND IN GOOD SHAPE. MR. <br />BROMANDER WILL COMMUNICATE FURTHER WITH US REGARDING DETAILS TO BE <br />CLEANED UP, HOPEFULLY PRIOR TO LABOR DAY, AND SUPPLY US WITH AN UPDATED <br />DRAFT. I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL BE PROVIDED WITH COPIES <br />OF THIS CURRENT DRAFT SO THAT THEY MAY COMMENT IMMEDIATELY. <br />cc: BROMANDER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.