Laserfiche WebLink
Gem Lake Planning Commission <br />David K. Gardner, Chairman <br />1399 E. County Road "E" <br />Gem Lake, Mn 55110-5231 <br />(612)429-9288 FAX 429-5034 <br />September 21, 1996 <br />Paul R. Emeott, Mayor <br />3960 Scheuneman Rd. <br />Gem Lake, Mn 55110 <br />Dear Paul: <br />The Gem Lake Planning Commission reconvened its September meeting <br />on September 19, 1996, at 3:30 PM, at the offices of SEH. The meeting <br />was continued from September 4 to accomodate the schedule of Mr. Roger <br />Bromander. Present were Emeott, Gardner, Nielsen, and Titcomb. Also in <br />attendance was Mr. Rob Hansen. The single purpose of the meeting was <br />to review the August draft of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The draft document has not yet been submitted to our neighboring <br />communities, as the maps were not complete. Mr. Bromander indicated <br />that such will be accomplished very soon. Copies are to be submitted <br />for comment to Vadnais Heights, White Bear Lake, and White Bear <br />Township. Also, VLAMO, Ramsey -Washington Water District, and the <br />School District will be copied. <br />The comments of the Met Council staff include several requests <br />which have been attended to by Mr. Bromander. One such is a request <br />for an ordinance implementing the Storm Drainage plan. As a matter of <br />policy, it was decided that such ordinance requirements, or other City <br />action, will be "dealt with within the 12 months succeeding the <br />completion and approval of the Comprehensive Plan." <br />we agreed to add language to the Water Supply Plan to deal with <br />emergency water shortages as per the policy of our water supplier (as <br />opposed to developing our own plan and to be consistent). <br />Regarding the revised Sanitary Sewer Plan, Mr. Emeott will verify <br />the numbers of households, etc., and confirm same to Mr. Bromander. <br />Mr. Bromander has suggested language for the Housing Plan to <br />suggest that the City explore various State programs for housing <br />rehabilitation, etc. Unless it is necessary to be politically correct, <br />the Commission feels that the City is not in a position to participate, <br />nor do we perceive an adequate need. <br />As previously discussed, the Met Council staff is anxious for the <br />City to participate in the Livable Communities Act and to provide plans <br />for provision of life -cycle and/or affordable housing. The City's <br />housing stock generally meets the "affordable" criteria, but the City <br />has few, if any, potential sites for multi -family development. We have <br />