My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014 06-17 CCP
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2010 - 2019
>
2014
>
2014 06-17 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2026 8:36:40 AM
Creation date
7/20/2026 8:33:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
CC PACKETS
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10% Civic Space requirement shall be calculated for the development as a whole, instead of for each <br />phase. The apportionment of Civic Space dedication may be unbalanced among the proposed <br />phases, though any initial phase of a development must include at least one Civic Space in proportion <br />to the size of the phase. Phased development plans which propose to meet over half of the Civic <br />Space requirement in a second or later phase must include a timetable which shows the development <br />dedicating or building at least half of the required Civic Space within 3 years of initial development <br />approval. <br />9.7.5 Building Placement Standards. The types of buildings proposed in the plan and their <br />placement within the property is governed by the Building Type Standards set forth at Section 9.6 <br />and depicted in Figures 6 through 15. The plan must depict the types of buildings intended for <br />construction, their proposed disposition, any incentives sought by virtue of the intended design of <br />any buildings or arrangement of building types, and any special requirements or requests for variance <br />required to implement the building placement plan. <br />9.7.6 Design Review. The Zoning Administrator shall refer all applications requiring evaluation of <br />the Design Standards in 9.10 to the City Architect. The Architect shall review the development plan <br />and supporting documents for conformance with the Design Review guidelines at Section 9.10 and <br />provide written comment to the Zoning Administrator. If any deficiencies are noted by the City <br />Architect in the design when the applying the Design Standards, the Architect shall describe the <br />deficiency and suggest at least one complying alternative. <br />9.7.7 Evaluation of Incentives. Any incentives created by the City Council and in effect at the <br />time of development application may be sought by the applicant. The incentive items and <br />allowances, and their effect on the overall Development Plan, shall be approved by the City Council, <br />unless specifically delegated within the ordinance creating the applicable incentive. The Zoning <br />Administrator shall confer with at least one City consultant, as directed by ordinance or at the <br />Administrator's best discretion, in order to evaluate the proposed incentives and make <br />recommendations to the approving authority. If incentives are applied for, the applicant and Zoning <br />Administrator shall reach agreement on the application of incentives prior to submitting the <br />application to the Planning Commission. If any applied -for incentives are recommended for <br />rejection, the applicant may elect to re -submit portions of the plans to incorporate the <br />recommendation without incurring new application fees; the applicant electing to re -submit plans <br />shall submit a written statement agreeing to an extension of applicable timelines under Minn. Stat. <br />15.99, Minn. Stat. § 462.358, and other applicable laws and ordinances. The extension request shall <br />be indefinite; the City shall process the re -submitted materials within the timelines specified by law, <br />treating the date of re -submission as the first day of any applicable time period. <br />9.8 Plans for Re -development of Single Lots or Small Subdivisions. An applicant shall follow the following <br />procedure when seeking approval for new building construction (not an addition or expansion to an existing <br />building) upon land which was developed at the time of the application, either requires no subdivision or is <br />eligible for minor subdivision approval, and for which no new streets are required. Such applications should <br />be processed for a Zoning Compliance Permit administratively by the Zoning Administrator unless the <br />proposal requires conditional use permit or variance approval. <br />9.8.1 Suggested Presentation. The plans for this type of development shall use the Building Type <br />templates at Figures 6 through 15, as allowed by the sub -zone in which the property lies. Plans <br />should introduce new lot lines, if any, and then depict the placement and disposition of the proposed <br />building type for each lot. <br />9.8.2 Required Submissions. The applicant shall submit four (4) sets of the application materials <br />listed in 9.7.2. The Zoning Administrator may allow the applicant to omit certain items if it is clear <br />Jthat they are not applicable to the overall proposal. In all circumstances, the proposal shall include <br />the elements required for review under Sections 9.7.5 (Building Type) and 9.7.6 (Design). <br />9.8.3 Connectivity requirements. While improvements to an existing roadway are not required, <br />plans under this subsection must indicate how the proposed construction would relate to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.