Laserfiche WebLink
Clerk Magnuson reported that Ramsey County Elections, in response to the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), has <br />asked the City to adopt a resolution authorizing the use of the Automark ballot marking device to insure HAVA <br />compliance, and to acknowledge the cost of the system acquisition and maintenance as delineated in the Joint Powers <br />Agreement by and between Ramsey County and Gem Lake, and that the public be informed of the City's intent to use <br />same. Magnuson explained the difference between the Accuvote which tabulates marked ballots andthe Automark which <br />assists voters in marking the ballot. Magnuson indicated we will be using a Ramsey County machine and will be paying <br />only maintenance and software maintenance. RESOLVED: Motionby Bosak, second by Rasmussento adopt Resolution <br />No. 2006-15 was unanimously approved. <br />Clerk Magnuson reported that a duly noticed public hearing was convened before the Planning Commission on 05 <br />June 2006 to receive public comment on a request for a Variance of from Section 9.5(1), Ordinance No. 43G of 9 feet <br />from the 15 foot side yard set back for the R-3 zoning district to 6' to accommodate construction of a detached garage <br />that will align with the attached garage already in place. Construction of the garage will not provide accessory building <br />square footage in excess of 1,000 square feet. The Planning Commission has recommended issuance of the Variance. <br />RESOLVED: Motion by Bosak, second by Watson to adopt Resolution No. 2006-18 was unanimously approved. <br />Clerk Magnuson then reported that the City has worked for the last several months with architect Chris Doehrman <br />who represents Bruce and Lome Shirley to determine how to best construct a home which will include indoor parking <br />for a 40' motor home. Mr. And Mrs. Shirley have acquired the former Thury property at 1400 Goose Lake Road. The <br />current design would create a rear elevation of approximately 44' or 9' greater than the current ordinance allows. <br />Architectural elements will preclude construction of any sheer surfaces of 44' without architectural elements to break <br />the facade. Working with the Plan Review Committee, the Shirley's have agreed to utilize elements contained in <br />Ordinance No. 43G and (proposed) Ordinance No. 43H for building height determination. A duly noticed public hearing <br />was convened and all present who wished to be heard were heard. The Planning Commission has recommended approval <br />of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of the proposed design. Mr. Newcome indicated inclusion of Clerk's <br />comments be incorporated. RESOLVED: Motion by Schilling, second by Watson to adopt Resolution No. 2006-19 was <br />unanimously approved. <br />Mayor Emeott then recognized Mr. Watson who spoke regarding the Planning Commission. Indicating his <br />discomfort at addressing the following issue as Mr. Hoeschler is out of the country, he stated it is important the City of <br />Gem Lake take on a new direction in the way our Planning Commission works. Based partly on the fact that the Zoning <br />Ordinance has been under consideration for more than 2 years, he feels it is important to take on new leadership. Watson <br />suggested that Mr. Hoeschler be asked to offer his resignation within 60 days and that Mr. Lindner assume leadership <br />as Interim Chairman of the Planning Commission. Mr. Bosak spoke indicating his desire to speak with Mr. Hoeschler <br />prior to taking the action to get his input. Mr. Rasmussen supports starting anew, he feels the Planning Commission <br />under Mr. Hoeschler's leadership have done a great deal of work for the community but supports the new start. Mr. <br />Schilling stated we need to get to more "win/win" situations and agrees it is time for a change. Mayor Emeottthen spoke <br />that he thanks Mr. Hoeschler for his very concerted efforts and also feels it is time for a change, indicating a more people <br />friendly environment needs to be created willing to negotiate more, especially during the Comprehensive Plan revision <br />process. Mr. Hansen then addressed the Council and Mayor Emeott then interrupted Mr. Hansen stating this is not the <br />time for discussion in an open forum. Mr. Hansen then distributed a hand out to the Council which was not provided to <br />Mr. Magnuson as the recording secretary. Mr. Hansen then called for Mayor Emeott to step down until the fall election <br />and for the replacement of several members ofthe planning commission. RESOLVED: Motion by Watson, second by <br />Schilling to ask Mr. Hoeschler to submit his resignation as Chairman of the Planning Commission and to appoint Mr. <br />Lindner as Interim Chair. Mr. Lindner was then asked if he would serve. He stated he has been a resident for 18 years <br />and has been involved with the Planning Commission for 10 years and has always attempted to balance heart and mind <br />in the decision process. He further indicated he would be honored to serve in the capacity. The motion was approved <br />on a vote of roll call vote of 4 Aye (Watson, Rasmussen, Schilling, Emeott) and 1 Nay (Bosak). <br />Mr. Watson then asked to speak on a non -agenda item regarding Mr. Hansen hand delivering items such as this <br />evenings and other recent hand deliveries. Mr. Watson requested that any person, resident or land owner or their <br />representatives deliver only through the City via the City Clerk so that consistency of receipt of all information is <br />uniform in process. While unsure of the process (law versus policy), materials dropped at the front door be disposed of. <br />Mr. Newcome then spoke indicating correspondence to be distributed to the City Council must typically be delivered <br />to the City at least 2 days prior to the preparation of City Council packets. He further stated most Councils will not <br />consider anything "dropped in their laps" at a City Council meeting. Following inquiry by Attorney Newcome, Mr. <br />Magnuson reported that, by policy, items for Council consideration are due by the close of business on the Thursday <br />prior to a meeting. Following comments from Mr. Hansen, Mr. Watson indicated a consistent delivery pattern will help. <br />Mr. Watson then spoke regarding the Hillary Farm deve I opine nt as it may be affected by the amendments contained <br />in (proposed) Ordinance No. 43H. He stated that as we already have an ongoing development and a Developer's <br />Page 2 of 17 <br />