My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006 07-26 CC PACKET
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
2006 07-26 CC PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2026 8:38:03 AM
Creation date
7/20/2026 8:35:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
CC PACKET
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M S JUN 14 2006 <br />Organization (VLAWMO). This organization has authority to control any <br />environmental threats to the lake from runoff on the Subject Property. In fact, the <br />mayor of Gem Lake currently chairs VLAWMO. <br />(h) Fiscal impact on the subject area and adjacent units of local <br />government, including present bonded indebtedness; local tax <br />rates of the county, school district, and other governmental <br />units, including,- where applicable, the net tax capacity of <br />platted and unplatted lands and the division of homestead and <br />nonhomestead property; and other tax aid issues. <br />As a small city that is surrounded by other cities, Gem Lake has limited <br />opportunities for developing its tax base. Given the large areas of the city that <br />are zoned residential, the opportunities for commercial development are further <br />limited. The Subject Property represents a significant amount of the city's <br />potential for enhancing its commercial property tax base. The tax revenue to <br />Gem Lake from property taxes on the Subject Property, if developed, would not <br />be inconsequential. The loss of that potential for revenue would be of greater <br />impact on Gem Lake than the corresponding increase in revenue would be to <br />Vadnais Heights, given the size of their respective budgets. <br />If left undeveloped, the Subject Property generates Tittle property tax <br />revenue and has little impact on the budget of Gem Lake. <br />(i) Relationship and effect of the proposed action on affected and <br />adjacent school districts and communities. <br />The City of Gem Lake and the City of Vadnais Heights are both within the <br />White Bear School District. There would be no impact on the school district. <br />(j) Whether delivery of services to the subject area can be <br />adequately and economically delivered by the existing <br />government. <br />The City of Gem Lake is capable of providing the minimal levels of service <br />that its citizens prefer. There is a real question, however, if it can and will provide <br />the sewer and water service for the development of its remaining vacant land, <br />including the Subject Property, on an economical and timely basis. <br />(k) Analysis of whether necessary governmental services can <br />best be provided through the proposed action or another type <br />of boundary adjustment. <br />Necessary government services can best be provided by annexation of <br />the Subject Property to the City of Vadnais Heights. The sewer line beneath <br />County Road E already exists and would be simple and inexpensive to connect. <br />Importantly, the City of Vadnais Heights is willing and eager to work out <br />development plans regarding the Subject Property, ensuring that the necessary <br />`11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.