My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-21 CC PACKET
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
2006-08-21 CC PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2026 8:51:01 AM
Creation date
7/20/2026 8:47:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
CC PACKET
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayor Paul Emeott <br />June 16, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />Additionally, the City Council's right to review each building permit within the final plat should <br />be interpreted to mean that the building pen -nit will be reviewed under the zoning regulations in <br />place at the time the development agreement was adopted. Any other reading of this provision <br />would mean that a developer would not be able to rely on existing standards when making <br />significant investments into the planning, design and construction of a subdivision, rendering any <br />development agreement ineffectual over time. An applicant must be able to depend on the terms <br />of the contract and conditions put in place by the City Council at the time the project is <br />approved. <br />The mission of the Builders Association includes working to ensure that local regulatory <br />schemes advance legitimate "public" interests and do not unnecessarily restrict the business <br />opportunities of residential builders. We believe that any implied retroactivity in the <br />amendments to the proposed Ordinance changes would constitute an affirmative act by the City <br />Council to change the terms that an applicant relied on when executing a development agreement <br />and proceeding with investments under its terms. <br />Specifically, McNulty negotiated its Development Agreement with the City over an extended <br />period of time. Additionally, McNulty agreed to waive its ability to appeal special assessments <br />on the Hillary Farm development in return for a commitment by the City that Hillary Farm <br />would not be subject to the new Ordinance amendments. It is our understanding that the City <br />Council is now asserting that after the two year statutory protection has ended, Hillary Farm will <br />be subject to the new requirements. Under these facts, the City should not apply the new <br />Ordinance amendments to the Hillary Farm Development or other similarly situated <br />developments governed by active development agreements. <br />Thank you for considering these comments on behalf of the Builders Association of the Twin <br />Cities. <br />S1 el <br />i'e r J. Coyle, for <br />Larkin Hoffinan Daly & Lindgren Ltd. <br />Direct Dial (952) 896-3214 <br />Direct Fax: (952) 896-3265 <br />Email: ocovlcAlarkinhoffman,com <br />Cc: Remi Stone <br />1080294.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.