HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022 Financial Statements
CITY OF GEM LAKE
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Financial Statements and
Supplemental Information
Year Ended
December 31, 2022
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER OFFICIALS 1
FINANCIAL SECTION
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 2–4
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Government-Wide Financial Statements
Statement of Net Position 5
Statement of Activities 6–7
Fund Financial Statements
Governmental Funds
Balance Sheet 8–9
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position 10
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 11–12
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund
Balances to the Statement of Activities 13
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances –
Budget and Actual – General Fund 14
Proprietary Funds
Statement of Net Position 15
Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 16
Statement of Cash Flows 17
Notes to Basic Financial Statements 18–30
OTHER REQUIRED REPORTS
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements
Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 31–32
Independent Auditor’s Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 33
Schedule of Findings and Responses 34
CITY OF GEM LAKE
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Table of Contents
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-1-
Gretchen Artig-Swomley Mayor
Leonard Cacioppo Councilmember
Laurel Hynes-Amlee Councilmember
Ben Johnson Councilmember
James Lindner Councilmember
Melissa Lawrence City Clerk
Tom Kelly City Treasurer
Joshua Patrick Planning Commission Chair
CITY COUNCIL
OTHER OFFICIALS
CITY OF GEM LAKE
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
City Council and Other Officials
as of December 31, 2022
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINANCIAL SECTION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-2-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the City Council and Management
City of Gem Lake, Minnesota
OPINIONS
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type
activities, and each major fund of the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the
City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, and each major
fund of the City as of December 31, 2022, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where
applicable, cash flows thereof, and the budgetary comparison for the General Fund for the year then
ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
BASIS FOR OPINIONS
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are
further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our
report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence
we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MANAGEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; and for the
design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or
events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a
going concern for 12 months beyond the financial statements date, including any currently known
information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
(continued)
C E R T I F I E D
A C C O U N T A N T S
P UBLIC
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA
Kalen T. Karnowski, CPA
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
Standard Letterhead-r2.qxp_167639 Letterhead-RV1 9/7/18 6:34 PM Page 1
-3-
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not absolute assurance
and, therefore, is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting
from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that,
individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgement made by a reasonable user based on
the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government
Auditing Standards, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such
procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is
expressed.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the
financial statements.
• Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate,
that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable
period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control related
matters that we identified during the audit.
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Management has omitted the management’s discussion and analysis that accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America require to be presented to supplement the basic financial
statements. Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by
the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial
reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historic al
context. Our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected by this missing information.
(continued)
-4-
OTHER INFORMATION
Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other information
comprises the introductory section, but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor ’s
report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial statements do not cover the other information, and we
do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other
information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the
basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based
on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information
exists, we are required to describe it in our report.
OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 5, 2023,
on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters.
The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial
reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness
of the City’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of
an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal
control over financial reporting and compliance.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 5, 2023
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activities Total
Assets
Cash and investments 903,694$ 396,298$ 1,299,992$
Receivables
Accounts 12,039 19,922 31,961
Accrued interest 1,659 842 2,501
Property taxes 8,270 – 8,270
Special assessments 679,261 – 679,261
Due from other governments 2,918 – 2,918
Prepaid items 121,627 4,458 126,085
Capital assets
Not being depreciated 2,500 – 2,500
Depreciated, net of accumulated depreciation 1,562,646 1,232,736 2,795,382
Total assets 3,294,614$ 1,654,256$ 4,948,870$
Liabilities
Accounts and contracts payable 16,241$ 63$ 16,304$
Accrued interest payable 12,664 – 12,664
Due to other governments 9,462 1,144 10,606
Accrued salaries payable 2,769 – 2,769
Deposits payable 19,890 – 19,890
Unearned revenue 41,323 – 41,323
Long-term liabilities
Amounts due in one year 105,000 – 105,000
Amounts due in more than one year 868,517 – 868,517
Total liabilities 1,075,866 1,207 1,077,073
Net position
Net investment in capital assets 591,629 1,232,736 1,824,365
Restricted for debt service 672,290 – 672,290
Restricted for park improvements 54,511 – 54,511
Unrestricted 900,318 420,313 1,320,631
Total net position 2,218,748 1,653,049 3,871,797
Total liabilities and net position 3,294,614$ 1,654,256$ 4,948,870$
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Statement of Net Position
December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -5-
Operating Capital
Charges for Grants and Grants and
Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions
Governmental activities
General government 257,267$ 24,886$ 16,998$ 589$
Public safety 120,607 – – –
Public works 108,020 24,862 – 23,970
Conservation and development 74,471 – 16,548 –
Interest and fiscal charges 31,222 – – –
Total governmental activities 591,587 49,748 33,546 24,559
Business-type activities
Water 63,955 26,330 – –
Sewer 64,472 61,942 – –
Total business-type activities 128,427 88,272 – –
Total 720,014$ 138,020$ 33,546$ 24,559$
General revenues
Property taxes
General purposes
Debt service
Franchise fees
Grants and contributions not restricted
Investment earnings (charges)
Other
Total general revenues
Change in net position
Net position – beginning of year
Net position – end of year
Program Revenues
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Statement of Activities
Year Ended December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -6-
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activities Total
(214,794)$ –$ (214,794)$
(120,607) – (120,607)
(59,188) – (59,188)
(57,923) – (57,923)
(31,222) – (31,222)
(483,734) – (483,734)
– (37,625) (37,625)
– (2,530) (2,530)
– (40,155) (40,155)
(483,734) (40,155) (523,889)
467,183 – 467,183
85,567 – 85,567
19,368 – 19,368
27 – 27
(30,474) (15,698) (46,172)
972 – 972
542,643 (15,698) 526,945
58,909 (55,853) 3,056
2,159,839 1,708,902 3,868,741
2,218,748$ 1,653,049$ 3,871,797$
Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position
-7-
G.O. Capital G.O. Capital
Improvement Improvement
Plan Bonds Plan Bonds Street
General Series 2015A Series 2018A Improvements
Assets
Cash and investments 379,587$ 63,950$ 51,771$ 353,989$
Receivables
Accounts 12,039 – – –
Accrued interest 510 167 117 751
Property taxes
Current 2,006 339 34 –
Delinquent 4,970 764 157 –
Special assessments
Delinquent 1,080 – 40,678 34,880
Deferred – – 406,781 195,842
Due from other governments 2,918 – – –
Prepaid items 1,431 70,346 49,850 –
Total assets 404,541$ 135,566$ 549,388$ 585,462$
Liabilities
Accounts and contracts payable 14,191$ –$ –$ 2,050$
Due to other governments 9,462 – – –
Accrued salaries payable 2,769 – – –
Deposits payable 19,890 – – –
Unearned revenue 41,323 – – –
Total liabilities 87,635 – – 2,050
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue 6,050 764 447,616 230,721
Fund balances
Nonspendable 1,431 70,346 49,850 –
Restricted for debt service – 64,456 51,922 –
Restricted for park improvements – – – –
Assigned for capital improvements – – – 352,691
Assigned for subsequent year’s budget 35,270 – – –
Unassigned 274,155 – – –
Total fund balances 310,856 134,802 101,772 352,691
Total liabilities, deferred inflows
of resources, and fund balances 404,541$ 135,566$ 549,388$ 585,462$
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Balance Sheet
Governmental Funds
December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -8-
Parks and Total
Playgrounds Governmental
54,397$ 903,694$
– 12,039
114 1,659
– 2,379
– 5,891
– 76,638
– 602,623
– 2,918
– 121,627
54,511$ 1,729,468$
–$ 16,241$
– 9,462
– 2,769
– 19,890
– 41,323
– 89,685
– 685,151
– 121,627
– 116,378
54,511 54,511
– 352,691
– 35,270
– 274,155
54,511 954,632
54,511$ 1,729,468$
-9-
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Total fund balances – governmental funds 954,632$
Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and,therefore,are not
reported as assets in governmental funds.
Cost of capital assets 2,730,046
Less accumulated depreciation (1,164,900)
Certain revenues (including taxes and special assessments)are included in net position,but are
excluded from fund balances until they are available to liquidate liabilities of the current period.685,151
Long-term liabilities,including bonds payable,are not due and payable in the current period and,
therefore, are not reported in the governmental funds.
Bonds payable (960,000)
Unamortized bond premiums (13,517)
Interest on long-term debt is included in the change in net position as it accrues,regardless of
when payment is due. However, it is included in the change in fund balances when due.(12,664)
Total net position – governmental activities 2,218,748$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because:
December 31, 2022
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet to the
Statement of Net Position
Governmental Activities
See notes to basic financial statements -10-
G.O. Capital G.O. Capital
Improvement Improvement
Plan Bonds Plan Bonds Street
General Series 2015A Series 2018A Improvements
Revenue
Taxes
Property taxes 461,648$ 77,914$ 7,653$ –$
Franchise fees 19,368 – – –
Special assessments 589 – 60,203 38,979
Intergovernmental 18,573 – – –
Licenses and permits 35,072 – – –
Fines and forfeitures 970 – – –
Charges for services 3,942 – – –
Investment earnings (charges)(8,246) (2,901) (1,564) (15,880)
Facility rental 5,184 – – –
Miscellaneous 4,580 962 10 –
Total revenue 541,680 75,975 66,302 23,099
Expenditures
Current
General government 233,886 – – –
Public safety 120,607 – – –
Public works 35,642 – – –
Conservation and development 70,825 – – –
Capital outlay 3,709 – – 3,413
Debt service
Principal – 65,000 40,000 –
Interest and fiscal charges – 12,309 21,250 –
Total expenditures 464,669 77,309 61,250 3,413
Excess (deficiency) of revenue
over expenditures 77,011 (1,334) 5,052 19,686
Other financing sources (uses)
Transfers in – – – 20,000
Transfers (out)(20,000) – – –
Total other financing
sources (uses)(20,000) – – 20,000
Net change in fund balances 57,011 (1,334) 5,052 39,686
Fund balances
Beginning of year 253,845 136,136 96,720 313,005
End of year 310,856$ 134,802$ 101,772$ 352,691$
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
Governmental Funds
Year Ended December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -11-
Parks and Total
Playgrounds Governmental
–$ 547,215$
– 19,368
– 99,771
– 18,573
– 35,072
– 970
– 3,942
(1,883) (30,474)
– 5,184
15,000 20,552
13,117 720,173
– 233,886
– 120,607
– 35,642
2,896 73,721
– 7,122
– 105,000
– 33,559
2,896 609,537
10,221 110,636
– 20,000
– (20,000)
– –
10,221 110,636
44,290 843,996
54,511$ 954,632$
-12-
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Total net change in fund balances – governmental funds 110,636$
Capital outlays are reported in governmental funds as expenditures.However,in the Statement
of Activities,the cost of those assets is allocated over the estimated useful lives as depreciation
expense.
Capital outlays 10,151
Depreciation expense (99,538)
Certain revenues (including taxes and special assessments)are included in the change in net
position,but are excluded from the change in fund balances until they are available to liquidate
liabilities of the current period.(69,677)
Repayment of bond principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds,but reduces long-term
liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. 105,000
Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial
resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds.
Amortization of bond premiums 1,282
Accrued interest 1,055
Change in net position – governmental activities 58,909$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Reconciliation of the Statement of
Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
to the Statement of Activities
Governmental Activities
Year Ended December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -13-
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Original and Over (Under)
Final Budget Actual Final Budget
Revenue
Taxes
Property taxes 470,928$ 461,648$ (9,280)$
Franchise fees 6,000 19,368 13,368
Special assessments – 589 589
Intergovernmental 8,000 18,573 10,573
Licenses and permits 25,950 35,072 9,122
Fines and forfeitures 500 970 470
Charges for services 3,400 3,942 542
Investment earnings (charges)5,000 (8,246) (13,246)
Facility rental 3,000 5,184 2,184
Miscellaneous 500 4,580 4,080
Total revenue 523,278 541,680 18,402
Expenditures
Current
General government 203,257 233,886 30,629
Public safety 124,943 120,607 (4,336)
Public works 106,978 35,642 (71,336)
Conservation and development 64,100 70,825 6,725
Capital outlay 4,000 3,709 (291)
Total expenditures 503,278 464,669 (38,609)
Excess of revenues over expenditures 20,000 77,011 57,011
Other financing (uses)
Transfers (out)(20,000) (20,000) –
Net change in fund balances –$ 57,011 57,011$
Fund balances
Beginning of year 253,845
End of year 310,856$
CITY OF GEM LAKE
General Fund
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual
Year Ended December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -14-
Water Sewer Total
Assets
Current assets
Cash and investments 6,886$ 389,412$ 396,298$
Receivables
Accounts 4,188 15,734 19,922
Accrued interest (200) 1,042 842
Due from other funds – 100,664 100,664
Prepaid items – 4,458 4,458
Total current assets 10,874 511,310 522,184
Noncurrent assets
Capital assets
Infrastructure 734,262 813,678 1,547,940
Less accumulated depreciation (75,309) (239,895) (315,204)
Total capital assets, net of
accumulated depreciation 658,953 573,783 1,232,736
Total assets 669,827$ 1,085,093$ 1,754,920$
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts and contracts payable –$ 63$ 63$
Due to other funds 100,664 – 100,664
Due to other governments 1,144 – 1,144
Total liabilities 101,808 63 101,871
Net position
Net investment in capital assets 658,953 573,783 1,232,736
Unrestricted (90,934) 511,247 420,313
Total net position 568,019 1,085,030 1,653,049
Total liabilities and net position 669,827$ 1,085,093$ 1,754,920$
Business-Type Activities – Enterprise Funds
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Statement of Net Position
Proprietary Funds
December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -15-
Water Sewer Total
Operating revenue
Charges for services 26,330$ 61,942$ 88,272$
Operating expenses
Operating expenses 50,486 48,406 98,892
Depreciation 13,469 16,066 29,535
Total operating expenses 63,955 64,472 128,427
Operating income (loss)(37,625) (2,530) (40,155)
Nonoperating income (expense)
Investment earnings (charges)2,194 (17,892) (15,698)
Change in net position (35,431) (20,422) (55,853)
Net position
Beginning of year 603,450 1,105,452 1,708,902
End of year 568,019$ 1,085,030$ 1,653,049$
Business-Type Activities – Enterprise Funds
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position
Proprietary Funds
Year Ended December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -16-
Water Sewer Total
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers and users 25,901$ 75,868$ 101,769$
Payments to vendors (50,021) (46,434) (96,455)
Net cash flows from operating activities (24,120) 29,434 5,314
Cash flows from noncapital and related
financing activities
Cash received from (paid to) other funds 28,612 (28,612) –
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received (charged)2,394 (18,125) (15,731)
Net change in cash and
cash equivalents 6,886 (17,303) (10,417)
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning – 406,715 406,715
Cash and cash equivalents – ending 6,886$ 389,412$ 396,298$
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash
flows from operating activities
Operating income (loss)(37,625)$ (2,530)$ (40,155)$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss)
to net cash flows from operating activities
Depreciation 13,469 16,066 29,535
Decrease (increase) in
Accounts receivable (429) 13,922 13,493
Due from other governmental units – 4 4
Prepaid items – 1,917 1,917
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable – 55 55
Due to other governments 465 – 465
Net cash flows from operating activities (24,120)$ 29,434$ 5,314$
Business-Type Activities – Enterprise Funds
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Statement of Cash Flows
Proprietary Funds
Year Ended December 31, 2022
See notes to basic financial statements -17-
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2022
-18-
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. Organization
The City of Gem Lake, Minnesota (the City) was incorporated in 1959 and operates under the state of
Minnesota Statutory Plan A form of government. The City Council is the governing body and is
composed of an elected mayor and four councilmembers who exercise legislative authority and determine
all matters of policy. The City Council appoints personnel responsible for the proper administration of all
affairs relating to the City.
The accounting policies of the City conform to accounting principles generall y accepted in the United
States of America as applicable to governmental units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board
(GASB) is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial
reporting principles.
B. Reporting Entity
As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these financial
statements include the City (the primary government) and its component units. Component units are
legally separate entities for which the primary government is financially accountable, or for which the
exclusion of the component unit would render the financial statements of the primary government
misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary government is financially accountable f or a
component unit includes whether or not the primary government appoints the voting majority of the
potential component unit’s board, is able to impose its will on the potential component unit, is in a
relationship of financial benefit or burden with the potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon
by the potential component unit.
Based on these criteria, there are no organizations considered to be component units of the City.
C. Government-Wide Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements (Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities)
display information about the reporting government as a whole. These statements include all of the
financial activities of the City. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and
intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a
significant extent on sales, fees, and charges for support.
The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or
segment are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a
specific function or segment. Program revenues include: 1) charges to customers or applicants who
purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or
segment, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special
assessments that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function
or segment. Taxes and other internally-directed revenues are reported as general revenues.
-19-
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus
and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when
a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes and special
assessments are recognized as revenues in the fiscal year for which they are certified for levy. Grants and
similar items are recognized as revenue when all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have
been met.
As a general rule, the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government -wide financial
statements. However, charges between the City’s enterprise funds and other functions are not eliminated,
as that would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported in those functions. Depreciation
expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on long-term debt is considered an
indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of Activities.
D. Fund Financial Statement Presentation
Separate fund financial statements are provided for governmental and proprietary funds. Major individual
governmental and enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement
focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis of accounting, transactions are
recorded in the following manner:
1. Revenue Recognition – Revenue is recognized when it becomes measurable and available.
“Measurable” means the amount of the transaction can be determined and “available” means
collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the
current period. For this purpose, the City considers revenues to be available if collected within
60 days after year-end. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current
fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. Grants
and similar items are recognized when all eligibility requirements imposed by the p rovider have
been met. Proceeds of long-term debt and acquisitions under leases, when applicable, are reported
as other financing sources.
Major revenue that is susceptible to accrual includes property taxes, special assessments,
intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, facility rentals, and interest
earned on investments. Major revenue that is not susceptible to accrual includes licenses and
permits, and miscellaneous revenue. Such revenue is recorded only when received because it is
not measurable until collected.
2. Recording of Expenditures – Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred,
except for principal and interest on long-term debt and other long-term obligations, which are
recognized as expenditures to the extent they have matured. Capital asset acquisitions are
reported as capital outlay expenditures in the governmental funds.
Proprietary fund financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and
the accrual basis of accounting, similar to the government-wide financial statements. Proprietary funds
distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses
generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a
proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the City’s enterprise
funds are charges to customers for sales and services. The operating expenses for the enterprise funds
include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets . All
revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses.
-20-
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Description of Funds
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
General Fund – The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for
all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds Series 2015A Debt Service Fund – The G.O. Capital
Improvement Plan Bonds Series 2015A Fund accounts for all debt service activity related to the
2015A bond.
G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds Series 2018A Debt Service Fund – The G.O. Capital
Improvement Plan Bonds Series 2018A Fund accounts for all debt service activity related to the
2018A bond.
Street Improvements Capital Project Fund – The Street Improvements Fund is used to account for
the accumulation of resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures for capital
outlays, including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities.
Parks and Playgrounds Capital Project Fund – The Parks and Playgrounds Fund is used to
account for the accumulation of resources that are restricted for capital outlays and other costs related
to maintaining and improving the City’s parks and playgrounds.
The City reports the following major proprietary funds:
Water Utility Enterprise Fund – The Water Utility Enterprise Fund accounts for customer water
service charges that are used to finance water operating expenses.
Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund – The Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund accounts for customer sewer
service charges that are used to finance sewer operating expenses.
E. Cash and Investments
Cash and temporary investments include balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the
extent available in various securities as authorized by state law. Earnings from the pooled investments are
allocated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund.
For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considers all highly liquid instruments with an
originally maturity from the time of purchase by the City of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
The proprietary funds’ portion in the government-wide cash and investment management pool is
considered cash equivalent.
-21-
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
The City reports all investments at fair value. The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the
fair value hierarchy established by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset.
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other
observable inputs; and Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs.
Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using a matrix pricing
technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on the securities’ relationship to benchmark
quoted prices.
See Note 2 for the City’s recurring fair value measurements as of year-end.
F. Receivables
Utility and miscellaneous accounts receivable are reported at gross. Since the City is generally able to
certify delinquent amounts to the county for collection as special assessments, no allowance for
uncollectible accounts has been provided on current receivables. All receivables are expected to be
collected within one year with the exception of deferred special assessments.
G. Property Taxes
Property tax levies are set by the City Council by December of each y ear, and are certified to
Ramsey County for collection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as collection agents for all
property taxes. The county spreads all levies over taxable property. Such taxes become a lien on
January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City on that date. Real property taxes may be paid by
taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15. Personal property taxes are due in full on
May 15. The county provides tax settlements to cities and other taxing districts three times a year; in July,
December, and January.
Property taxes are recognized as revenue in the year levied in the government -wide financial statements.
In the governmental fund financial statements, taxes are recognized as revenue when received in cash or
within 60 days after year-end. Taxes which remain unpaid at December 31, are classified as delinquent
taxes receivable, and are offset by a deferred inflow of resources in the governmental fund financial
statements.
H. Special Assessments
Special assessments represent the financing for public improvements paid for by benefiting property
owners. Special assessments are recorded as receivables upon certification to the county. Special
assessments are recognized as revenue in the year levied in the government-wide financial statements. In
the governmental fund financial statements, special assessments are recognized as revenue when received
in cash or within 60 days after year-end. Governmental fund special assessments receivable which remain
unpaid on December 31, are offset by a deferred inflow of resources in the governmental fund financial
statements.
I. Prepaid Items
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as
prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements. Prepaid items are reported using
the consumption method and recorded as expenditures/expenses at the time of consumption.
-22-
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
J. Capital Assets
Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, sidewalks,
street lights, and similar items) are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities
columns in the government-wide financial statements. Such assets are capitalized at historical cost or
estimated historical cost for assets where actual historical cost is not available . The City defines capital
assets as those with an initial, individual cost of $500 or more with an estimated useful life in excess of
five years. Donated assets are recorded as capital assets at their acquisition value at the date of donation.
The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend
asset lives are not capitalized. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as
projects are constructed.
The government reports infrastructure assets on a network and subsystem basis. In the case of the initial
capitalization of general infrastructure assets (i.e., those reported by governmental activities), the City
chose to include all such items regardless of their acquisition date or amount.
Capital assets are recorded in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, but are not
reported in the governmental fund financial statements.
Depreciation on exhaustible assets is recorded as an allocated expense in the statement of activities with
accumulated depreciation reflected in the Statement of Net Position. Since surplus assets are sold for an
immaterial amount when declared as no longer needed for city purposes, no salvage value is taken into
consideration for depreciation purposes. Capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over
the following estimated useful lives:
Estimated
Assets Useful Life
Buildings 40 years
Office equipment 5 to 10 years
Infrastructure 20 to 50 years
Capital assets not being depreciated include land and construction in progress.
K. Long-Term Liabilities
In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term
obligations are reported as liabilities. If they are material, bond premiums and discounts are deferred and
amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line method. Bond issuance costs are expensed in
the period incurred.
In the governmental fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are not
reported as liabilities until due and payable. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing
sources. Premiums or discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources or uses,
respectively. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported
as expenditures.
-23-
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
L. Net Position
In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, net position represents the differences
between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflow of resources.
Net position is displayed in three components:
• Net Investment in Capital Assets – Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation,
reduced by any outstanding debt attributable to acquire capital assets.
• Restricted Net Position – Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed
on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of
other governments.
• Unrestricted Net Position – All other net position that does not meet the definition of
“restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.”
The City applies restricted resources first when an expense is incurred for which both restricted and
unrestricted resources are available.
M. Fund Balance Classifications
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose
constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows:
• Nonspendable – Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items,
inventory, and other long-term assets.
• Restricted – Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by
creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions.
• Committed – Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by resolution of the
City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City
Council removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to
previously commit those amounts.
• Assigned – Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts
intended to be used by the City for specific purposes, but do not meet the criteria to be classified
as restricted or committed. In governmental funds, assigned amounts represent intended uses
established by the governing body itself or by an official to which the governing body delegates
the authority.
• Unassigned – The residual classification for the General Fund, which also reflects negative
residual amounts in other funds.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to first use
restricted resources, then use unrestricted resources as they are needed.
When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to use
resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned.
-24-
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
N. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting
Budget amounts are presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Each fall, the City Council
adopts a General Fund budget for the following fiscal year beginning January 1. The City has established
budgetary control at the fund level. Budget appropriations lapse at year-end.
O. Risk Management
The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts: theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets;
errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The City continues to carry commercial
insurance for all risks of loss, including disability and employee health insurance. Settled claims resulting
from these risks have not exceeded insurance coverage in any of the past three fiscal years . There were no
significant reductions in insurance coverage in the current year.
P. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period . Actual results could differ from
such estimates.
Q. Interfund Receivables and Payables
In the fund financial statements, activity between funds that is representative of lending or borrowing
arrangements is reported as either “due to/from other funds” (current portion) or “advances to/from other
funds.” All other outstanding balances between funds are reported as “due to/from other funds.” Any
residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities are
reported in the government-wide financial statements as “internal balances.”
R. Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources
In addition to assets and liabilities, statements of financial position, or balance sheets, will sometimes
report deferred outflows or inflows of resources. These separate financial statement elements represent a
consumption or acquisition of net position that applies to a future period and so will not be recognized as
an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) or an inflow of financial resources (revenue) until then.
Unavailable revenue arises only under a modified accrual basis of accounting and, therefore, is only
reported in the governmental funds financial statements. The governmental funds report unavailable
revenue from two sources: property taxes and special assessments. These amounts are deferred and
recognized as inflows of resources in the period they become available.
-25-
NOTE 2 – DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS
A. Components of Deposits and Investments
Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following:
Deposits 409,125$
Investments 890,867
Total 1,299,992$
B. Deposits
In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at financial institutions which are
authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts and certificates of deposit.
The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits:
Custodial Credit Risk – In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the
City’s deposits may be lost.
Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety
bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110 percent of the deposits not
covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes
treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated “A” or
better; revenue obligations rated “AA” or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the
Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities
pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in
an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned
or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral . The City has no additional deposit
policies addressing custodial credit risk.
At year-end, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits was $409,125, while the balance on the bank
records was $534,616. At December 31, 2022, all deposits were fully covered by federal deposit
insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral held by the City’s agent in the City’s name.
C. Investments
The City has the following investments at year-end:
Fair Value
Measurements
Investment Type Rating Agency Using Less Than 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 Total
Municipal bonds AA Moody’s Level 2 –$ –$ 132,807$ 132,807$
Municipal bonds AA S&P Level 2 – 337,710 – 337,710
Negotiable certificates of deposit N/R N/A Level 2 – 420,350 – 420,350
Total investments –$ 758,060$ 132,807$ 890,867$
N/R – Not Rated
Interest Risk – Maturity Duration in YearsCredit Risk
N/A – Not Applicable
-26-
NOTE 2 – DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED)
Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant:
Custodial Credit Risk – For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the
counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer), the City would not be able to
recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside
party. The City’s investment policy does not further address this risk.
Credit Risk – This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its
obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City’s investments to direct obligations or obligations
guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the
Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the
two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the invest ments have a final
maturity of 13 months or less; general obligations rated “A” or better; revenue obligations rated “AA”
or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated “A” or better; bankers’
acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial
paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality
category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less;
Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of
a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top
two highest categories; repurchase or reverse purchase agreements and securities lending agreements
with financial institutions qualified as a “depository” by the government entity, with banks that are
members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000; that are a
primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York ; or
certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The City’s investment policy does not further address
credit risk.
Concentration Risk – This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the City’s
investments (considered 5.0 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding
U.S. guaranteed investments (such as treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The City’s
investment policy states that no more than 5.0 percent of the overall portfolio may be invested in the
securities of a single issuer, except for the securities of the United States government, or an external
investment pool. The following is a list of investments, which individually comprise more than
5.0 percent of the City’s total investments:
Goldman Sachs Bank – certificates of deposit 81,418$ 9.1%
Hartford CT – municipal bonds 138,530$ 15.6%
Comenity Capital Bank – certificates of deposit 114,164$ 12.8%
Madison NJ – municipal bonds 199,180$ 22.4%
New York City – municipal bonds 132,807$ 14.9%
Texas Exchange Bank – certificates of deposit 224,768$ 25.2%
Interest Rate Risk – This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investments
resulting from changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the
greater the risk). The City’s investment policy does not further address interest rate risk.
-27-
NOTE 3 – CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2022 was as follows:
A. Changes in Capital Assets Used in Governmental Activities
Balance –Transfers and
Beginning Completed Balance –
of Year Additions Deletions Construction End of Year
Capital assets, not depreciated
Land 2,500$ –$ –$ –$ 2,500$
Construction in progress 227,277 9,626 – (236,903) –
Total capital assets, not depreciated 229,777 9,626 – (236,903) 2,500
Capital assets, depreciated
Buildings 907,712 – – – 907,712
Office equipment 18,678 525 – – 19,203
Infrastructure 1,563,728 – – 236,903 1,800,631
Total capital assets, depreciated 2,490,118 525 – 236,903 2,727,546
Less accumulated depreciation for
Buildings (312,199) (22,634) – – (334,833)
Office equipment (15,154) (1,272) – – (16,426)
Infrastructure (738,009) (75,632) – – (813,641)
Total accumulated depreciation (1,065,362) (99,538) – – (1,164,900)
Net capital assets, depreciated 1,424,756 (99,013) – 236,903 1,562,646
Net capital assets 1,654,533$ (89,387)$ –$ –$ 1,565,146$
B. Changes in Capital Assets Used in Business-Type Activities
Balance –Transfers and
Beginning Completed Balance –
of Year Additions Deletions Construction End of Year
Capital assets, depreciated
Infrastructure 1,547,940$ –$ –$ –$ 1,547,940$
Less accumulated depreciation for
Infrastructure (285,669) (29,535) – – (315,204)
Net capital assets 1,262,271$ (29,535)$ –$ –$ 1,232,736$
C. Depreciation Expense by Function
Depreciation expense was charged to the following functions:
Governmental activities
General government 23,906$
Public works 74,882
Conservation and development 750
Total depreciation expense – governmental activities 99,538$
Business-type activities
Water 13,469$
Sewer 16,066
Total depreciation expense – business-type activities 29,535$
-28-
NOTE 4 – LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
A. Components of Long-Term Debt
Final Balance –
Original Issue Interest Rate Issue Date Maturity Date End of Year
Governmental activities
General obligation (G.O.) bonds
G.O. Refunding Bonds of 2015A 775,000$ 1.25–2.90%06/17/2015 02/01/2028 405,000$
G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2018A 660,000$ 3.00–4.00%07/12/2018 02/01/2034 555,000
960,000
Unamortized premiums 13,517
Total governmental activities
long-term debt 973,517$
B. Changes in Long-Term Debt
Balance –Balance –
Beginning End Due Within
of Year Additions Retirements of Year One Year
Governmental activities
G.O. bonds
G.O. Refunding Bonds of 2015A 470,000$ –$ 65,000$ 405,000$ 65,000$
G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2018A 595,000 – 40,000 555,000 40,000
Unamortized premiums 14,799 – 1,282 13,517 –
Total 1,079,799$ –$ 106,282$ 973,517$ 105,000$
C. Minimum Debt Payments
Minimum annual principal and interest payments required to retire bonds payable are as follows:
Year Ending
December 31,Principal Interest
2023 105,000$ 29,029$
2024 105,000 26,301
2025 105,000 23,476
2026 110,000 20,488
2027 115,000 17,270
2028–2032 310,000 47,390
2033–2034 110,000 4,400
Total 960,000$ 168,354$
Governmental
Activities
D. Description of Long-Term Debt
General Obligation Bonds – The bonds were issued for improvements or projects, or to refund
previously issued bonds, which benefited the City as a whole and are, therefore, repaid from ad valorem
levies.
E. Ultimate Responsibility for Debt
All general obligation bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City.
-29-
NOTE 5 – INTERFUND BALANCES AND ACTIVITIES
A. Due To/From Other Funds
Individual fund receivable and payable balances at December 31, 2022 are as follows:
Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount
Sewer Enterprise Water Enterprise 100,664$
Interfund receivable and payable balances represent the elimination of negative cash between funds.
B. Interfund Transfers
Individual fund transfers during the year ended December 31, 2022 are as follows:
Transfers In
Governmental Funds
Street
Transfers Out Improvements
Governmental funds
General 20,000$
During 2022, the City made interfund transfers to provide additional funds for completing upcoming
capital projects.
NOTE 6 – NET INVESTMENT IN CAPITAL ASSETS
The government-wide Statement of Net Position at December 31, 2022 includes the City’s net investment
in capital assets, calculated as follows:
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activities Total
Net investment in capital assets
Capital assets
Not being depreciated 2,500$ –$ 2,500$
Depreciated, net of accumulated depreciation 1,562,646 1,232,736 2,795,382
Less capital related long-term debt outstanding (973,517) – (973,517)
Total net investment in capital assets 591,629$ 1,232,736$ 1,824,365$
-30-
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
A. Legal Claims
The City has the usual and customary type of miscellaneous legal claims pending at year -end. Although
the outcome of these lawsuits is not presently determinable, the City’s management believes that the City
will not incur any material monetary loss resulting from these claims. No loss has been recorded on the
City’s financial statements relating to these claims.
B. Federal and State Funds
Amounts recorded or receivable from federal and state agencies are subject to agency audit and
adjustment. Any disallowed claims, including amounts already collected, may constitute a liability of the
applicable funds. The amount, if any, of claims which may be disallowed by the grantor agencies cannot
be determined at this time, although the City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial.
NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
New Accounting Standard
A new standard issued by the GASB will result in significant changes in the reporting of
subscription-based information technology arrangements (SBITAs) once it becomes effective for
governmental entities. This standard must be adopted by the City beginning in 2023, and may require the
restatement of certain balances reported as of December 31, 2022. The effects of this change have not yet
been determined and are not reflected in these financial statements.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
OTHER REQUIRED REPORTS
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-31-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the City Council and Management
City of Gem Lake, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, t he financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, and each major fund of the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota (the City)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which
collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated
June 5, 2023.
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control
over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or
detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination
of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the City’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A
significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less
severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the lim ited purpose described in the first paragraph of this
section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies and, therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencie s may
exist that were not been identified. We identified one deficiency in internal control, described in the
accompanying Schedule of Findings and Responses as finding 2022-001, that we consider to be a
material weakness.
(continued)
C E R T I F I E D
A C C O U N T A N T S
P UBLIC
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA
Kalen T. Karnowski, CPA
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
Standard Letterhead-r2.qxp_167639 Letterhead-RV1 9/7/18 6:34 PM Page 1
-32-
REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an
objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests
disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under
Government Auditing Standards.
CITY’S RESPONSE TO FINDING
Government Auditing Standards requires the auditor to perform limited procedures on the City’s response
to the finding identified in our audit and described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and
Responses. The City’s response was not subjected to the other auditing procedures applied in the audit of
the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal
control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly,
this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 5, 2023
-33-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
To the City Council and Management
City of Gem Lake, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, and each major fund of the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota (the City)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which
collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated
June 5, 2023.
MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to
comply with the provisions of the contracting – bid laws, depositories of public funds and public
investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous
provisions, and tax increment financing sections of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for
Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, insofar as they relate to
accounting matters. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such
noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to
our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions, insofar as they
relate to accounting matters.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
This report is intended solely for the information and use of those charged with governance and
management of the City and the State Auditor and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by
anyone other than these specified parties.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 5, 2023
C E R T I F I E D
A C C O U N T A N T S
P UBLIC
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA
Kalen T. Karnowski, CPA
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
Standard Letterhead-r2.qxp_167639 Letterhead-RV1 9/7/18 6:34 PM Page 1
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Schedule of Findings and Responses
Year Ended December 31, 2022
-34-
FINDINGS – MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
2022-001 INADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES
Criteria – Internal control over financial reporting.
Condition – The City of Gem Lake, Minnesota (the City) has limited segregation of duties in
a number of areas, including, but not limited to, controls over cash receipts, cash
disbursements, utility billing, and payroll.
Questioned Costs – Not applicable.
Context – The condition applies to multiple areas as noted above.
Repeat Finding – This is a current year and prior year finding.
Cause – The limited segregation of duties is primarily caused by the limited size of the City’s
office staff.
Effect – One important element of internal accounting controls is an adequate segregation of
duties such that no one individual have responsibility to execute a transaction, have physical
access to the related assets, and have responsibility or authority to record the transaction. A
lack of segregation of duties subjects the City to a higher risk that errors or fraud could occur
and not be detected in a timely manner in the normal course of business.
Recommendation – We recommend that the City continue its efforts to segregate duties as
best it can within the limits of what the City considers to be cost-beneficial.
Management Response – There is no disagreement with the audit finding. The City reviews
and makes improvements to its internal control structure on an ongoing basis to maximize the
segregation of duties in all areas within the limits of the staff available. However, the City
does not consider it cost-beneficial at this time to increase the size of its finance department
staff in order to further segregate accounting functions.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK