My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-08; Delinquent Septic Inspection Charges
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010 - 2019
>
2011
>
2011-08; Delinquent Septic Inspection Charges
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2025 7:43:11 AM
Creation date
10/8/2025 7:43:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 05000
Document
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NO. 2011-08 <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES QF A MEETING OF THE CITY <br />COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF GEM. LAKE, MINNESOTA <br />HELD ON SEPTEMBER 20th, 2011 <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem <br />Lake, Minnesota; was duly held in. said City on September 20, 2011, at 7:00 O'clock p.m. <br />The following members were present: Mayor Uzpen, Council Member Artig-Swomley, Council <br />Member Lindner and Council Member Bosak. Council Member Rasmussen was absent. <br />RESOLUTION CERTIFYING. DELINQUENT SEPTIC INSPECTION CHARGES <br />(AUDITOR N0. 37110003) TO COUNTY AUDITOR BE IT RESOLVED BY THE <br />CITY COUNCIL. OF GEM LAKE, :MINNESOTA: <br />1: That pursuant to Section 7A,1, of Ordinance No. 67B, the Clerk, is hereby authorized and <br />directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County, Minnesota, the delinquent septic charges on the <br />following described parcels of real estate in the Town of White Bear: <br />PROPERTY ID NO. <br />AMOUNT <br />i <br />22. 30. 22.43. 0002 <br />100.00. <br />22,30.&43.0034 <br />70.00 <br />22.30:22.44.0012 <br />70.00 <br />22.30.22.44,0015 <br />70.60 <br />22130.22.44.0023 <br />70..00 <br />22.30.22:4 M27 <br />70.00 <br />27.30.22.22 0003 <br />70.00 <br />27.30.22.22.0012 70.00. <br />28. 30.22,14.0001 7.0.00 <br />28,30.22.44.0002 70.00. <br />28:.30122.44.0003 70.00 <br />$ 800.00 <br />The motion of the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was introduced by:council member.Bosak <br />and seconded by council member Lindner; and upon vote being taken the resolution passed Ayes 4, <br />Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.