Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025 03-18 CC PacketCITY OF GEM LAKE Heritage Hall 4200 Otter Lake Road | Gem Lake, MN 55110 651-747-2790/92 | 651-747-2795 (fax) E-mail city@gemlakemn.org City Council Meeting – March 18, 2025 Call to Order of City Council Meeting By Mayor Artig-Swomley at 7:_____ p.m. Call of Roll Artig-Swomley Cacioppo Patrick Johnson Lindner Approve Agenda and Minutes • Accept the Agenda for the March 18, 2025, City Council Meeting • Approve the Minutes from the February 18, 2025, City Council Meeting • Accept the Minutes from the March 11, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting Special Presentations/Public Hearings • MPCA Well Testing Updates Consent Agenda • Resolution #2025-007 March 2025 Donation to White Bear Lake Area Food Shelf • 2025 Garden Overlay Interim Use Permit – Bryan Hansen County Road E Property • Monthly Financial Report(s) • Claims Committee Reports • Planning Commission Old Business • Newsletter Updates / Topics / Suggestions • Code Enforcement Issues Discussion • Barnett KIA Developers Agreement Draft New Business • Conditional Use Permit – 4039 Scheuneman Road – Gem Lake Hills Golf Course o Resolution #2025-008 Approving CUP for Gem Lake Hills Golf Course • Resolution #2025-009 Adoption of the 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan • Resolution #2025-010 2026-2030 Joint Powers Agreement with the RCGISUG • Prairie Restoration Quote • Updated Generator Quotes for Heritage Hall • Website Format Discussion • Future Charitable Gambling Donations o White Bear Lake Emergency Food Shelf Community Outreach to Other Cities and Government Bodies Presentations from the Public, 2 minutes maximum Open Items for Council Members to Bring Up Future Council Meetings • Next City Council Meeting, Tuesday, April 15, 2025 o Attendance Inquiry • Next City Council Workshop, Monday, April 14, 2025 – CANCELED Adjournment – The meeting adjourned at ________ City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting Minutes February 18, 2025 1 City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting – February 18, 2025 Meeting Minutes Mayor Gretchen Artig-Swomley called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilmembers Jim Lindner, Len Cacioppo, Ben Johnson and Joshua Patrick were present. Also present: City Attorney Kevin Beck, City Treasurer Tom Kelly, City Engineer Justin Gese, Planning Commission Chair Don Cummings and Acting City Clerk Melissa Lawrence. February 18, 2025, Agenda A motion was introduced by Councilmember Linder to accept the agenda, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. Minutes A motion was introduced by Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Johnson to approve the January 21, 2025, City Council Meeting minutes. Motion carried 5-0. Councilmember Cacioppo abstained because he was not present at the December meeting. Councilmember Patrick abstained because he was not a member of the Council in December 2024. A motion was introduced by Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo to accept the January 14, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting minutes. Motion carried 5-0. Special Presentations/Public Hearings None Consent Agenda Resolution #2025-006 February 2025 Donation to White Bear Lake Area Food Shelf Monthly Financial Report(s) Claims All items on the consent agenda were reviewed by the Council. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion to approve all the items listed on the consent agenda, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. Committee Reports Planning Commission Chair Don Cummings summarized for the council the work that they will be doing on the Consolidated Land Use Ordinance over the course of 2025. The commission will go over it little by little and make sure it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and look towards the future to address anything else that may need to be updated. Commission Chair Cummings shared how happy the commission is to have a great support staff to work with to do the job. Old Business Newsletter Updates / Topics / Suggestions A newsletter was given to the Council for edits. The Acting City Clerk will send the newsletter to the printers by Thursday, February 20, to have ready to send out for March. White Bear Lake Public Safety Contract Discussion During the January 21 City Council meeting the Council approved to pay White Bear Lake the Public Safety bills for interest that have been in dispute. A letter was sent to the City of White Bear Lake informing them that the deal they agree on for White Bear Township is the same deal the City of Gem Lake would be granted. Payment was sent to help keep the City of Gem Lake in good standing with the City of White Bear Lake and not an acceptance that Gem Lake should be being charged interest on the new building. City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting Minutes February 18, 2025 2 Code Enforcement Issues Discussion The Acting City Clerk and Building Official have had a difficult time scheduling a rental inspection for 3930 Scheuneman Road. Mayor Artig-Swomley has asked City Attorney Kevin Beck to draft a letter for the city to send to the homeowner. Mayor Artig-Swomley shared that she recently saw three (3) men in reflective vests picking up pallets along the railroad tracks on Hoffman Road near the back side of the rental property. She was unsure if someone reached out to the railroad company regarding all the pallets beings stored in that area or if this was even related to city concerns. City Attorney Kevin Beck did not recall informing the railroad company, although the previous attorney might have. Barnett KIA Project Update The city is concerned about some potentially unprofessional behavior on the part of a contractor in their interactions with city staff. There have been several issues with process and permits on the KIA Barnett project. A meeting was held to discuss and resolve these issues. At this time the city and KIA are waiting on the developer’s agreement to come over from legal. NOAA Radio Acting City Clerk Melissa Lawrence received requests for roughly 20 NOAA radios. Mayor Artig- Swomley plans to advertise again in the newsletter set to go out in March to see if there is any more interest. New Business Interim Use Permit (year 3) for Goats at 3944 Scheuneman Road Ted and Nikki Pax of 3944 Scheuneman Road submitted their annual IUP for goats to be reviewed and approved. There have been no complaints over the past couple of years. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion to approve the IUP for 3944 Scheuneman Road to continue to harbor goats on their property, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. City Owned Storm Sewer Replacement Project City Engineer Justin Gese informed the Council that when Barnett KIA opens up the road to replace their portion of the storm sewer pipe, if the city owned portion is in need of replacement that it be regarded to as an emergency replacement and City Engineer Justin Gese can be given permission to make that call. Mr. Gese received confirmation from a contractor that if the pipe does need to be replaced that it would be about $90-$100/LF of pipe and that $15,000.00 is a good estimate. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion to approve City Engineer Justin Gese to make an emergency decision so as the price does not exceed $20,000.00 for replacement, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. RWMWD 2027 Watershed Management Plan Update and Request for City Input The city has been asked to provide feedback to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District on its 2027 Watershed Management Plan Update. This plan will establish goals, policies, and actions for the RWMWD’s management of the watershed. Mayor Artig-Swomley asked City Engineer Justin Gese about it and was informed that Emily Jennings from SEH can provide any feedback for the city. Gateway District Met Council Discussion Mayor Artig-Swomley is interested in setting up a meeting with the city’s representative from the Metropolitan Council to discuss options for the Gateway District and what type of development can take place in certain areas. City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting Minutes February 18, 2025 3 Planning Commission Position Approval The Commission is recommending Laurel Amlee be appointed to the Planning Commission for the City of Gem Lake. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion to appoint Laurel Amlee as the newest commission member, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. Ordinance No. 113 – Right-of-Way Updates The City Council tasked the Planning Commission with reviewing Ordinance No. 113 regarding city right- of-way (typically shortened to ROW). ROW includes the street and area on either side of the street used to support the use of the street, such as sidewalks, shoulders, and ditches. ROW can also (per State Statute include cartways, bicycle lanes, other dedicated rights-of-way for travel purposes, and utility easements of local governments. Areas below and above the roadway are also part of the ROW. Private utilities (such as electric) and municipal utilities (such as water or sewer infrastructure) are typically constructed within a ROW. A ROW ordinance allows a city to manage the use and access to the ROW. The current ordinance (No. 113) was adopted by the city in January of 2010. This version was consistent with the current (at that time) model ordinance available from the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC). Since 2010, State and Federal law related to management and access to ROW has changed, most notably with regards to telecommunications. One of the bigger changes is “small cell wireless facilities,” which is technology that allows for increased usage of wireless networks by cell phones. It is imperative that the city ensures their ordinances are consistent with current State and Federal law. Staff has reviewed the current version of Ordinance No. 113 and proposes the following changes as summarized below. These changes are consistent with the latest model ordinance provided by LMC. Section # Comments Throughout • Administration section is added (Section 3), with the City Engineer designated to administer the ordinance (consistent with current city practices). • Replace references to “zoning administrator” with “city engineer.” • New section (Section 7) added regarding small cell wireless facilities. Added references to small cell wireless facilities where needed in other sections. • Move fees to the Fee Schedule. 2 New definitions proposed to be added to Section 2. 5 Updates to payments and permit application language. 10 & 11 New sections regarding Joint Applications for ROW work and obligations, consistent with language from model ordinance. 12 & 13 Revised language regarding permit denial and installation requirements, consistent with language from model ordinance. 18 & 19 Updated language on requirements for mapping data, locating facilities, and undergrounding, consistent with language from model ordinance. 24 Revised language regarding abandonment and removal of facilities within the ROW, consistent with language from model ordinance. The Planning Commission reviewed the redlined and clean versions of the proposed revisions at their February 11th meeting and recommended the City Council approve of the changes. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion to approve the suggested revisions to Ordinance No. 113, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. Generator Quote for Heritage Hall Mayor Artig-Swomley suggested to table the discussion on generators to do more research and get quotes that are more comparable. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion to table the discussion, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting Minutes February 18, 2025 4 Mayor Artig-Swomley asked if Councilmember Patrick could reach out to the companies that already supplied quotes and ask for them to make them more comparable. Councilmember Patrick said he would take on the task and will reach out to other companies as well and will bring information to the March 18 meeting. Future Charitable Gambling Donations White Bear Lake Emergency Food Shelf Mayor Artig-Swomley suggested that the Council donate in March $1,500.00 to the White Bear Lake Emergency Food Shelf. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion to request a donation in the amount of $1,500.00 for the White Bear Lake Emergency Food Shelf, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Motion carried 5-0. Community Outreach to Other Cities and Government Bodies Mayor Artig-Swomley shared that the Vadnais Heights Planned Unit Development Open House had about 8 attendees, all of whom were Gem Lake residents. One concern was about the traffic flow. There will be a traffic study conducted through Ramsey County. There will be a presentation of a formal plan on the development in the spring. This development is a possible opportunity for part of Gem Lake to hook up to city water. Mayor Artig-Swomley shared that she received a very nice email from Vadnais Heights regarding the water billing at the Villas. The mayor will be meeting with Vadnais Heights on Thursday, February 27 to discuss. Mayor Artig-Swomley shared that the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has a system that tracks public water systems. Gem Lake needs to have a certified utility operator to do the required testing. At this time the city is waiting on Dale of White Bear Township to get back to City Engineer Justin Gese. The Mayor will be meeting with Dale to discuss this and get things figured out. Councilmember Johnson will have some feedback to report on for the corridor project in a couple of weeks. Councilmember Lindner shared that the DNR has posted a grants program on the 3M PFAS settlement. It doesn’t necessarily apply to Gem Lake but wanted to let the council know about it. Presentation from the Public, 2 Minutes Maximum None. Open Items for Council Members to Bring Up None Future Council Meetings City Council, Tuesday, March 18, 2025. City Council Workshop, Monday, March 10, 2025, is CANCELED. Attendance Inquiry At this time all in attendance will be at the March0 meeting. Adjournment Being there no further business, following a motion from Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo, the meeting adjourned at 7:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melissa Lawrence City of Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 11, 2025 1 City of Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting – March 11, 2025 Meeting Minutes Due to a last-minute scheduling conflict the Planning Commission would not have had a quorum to hold their scheduled public hearing. Mayor Artig-Swomley temporarily appointed Brad Naylor to the Planning Commission for the night to fulfill the quorum requirement to hold a public hearing. Planning Commission Chair Don Cummings called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commission Member Art Pratt was present with temporarily appointed Commission Member Brad Naylor. Not present were Commission Members Stephanie Farrell and Derek Wippich with known excused absences and newly appointed Commission Member Laurel Amlee with a last-minute family emergency. Also present: Graduate Community Planner CJ Sycks, Acting City Clerk Melissa Lawrence and Gem Lake Hills Golf Course representatives Jim Kalkes, Steve Nasvik, and Jason Whitehill. City Attorney fill-in Chad Lemmons made an appearance before the meeting to see if there were any questions, but did not sit in on the meeting as he was needed at the White Bear Township Annual Meeting in the main chambers. March 11, 2025 A motion was introduced by Commissioner Pratt to accept the agenda, seconded by Temporary Commissioner Naylor. Motion carried 3-0. Minutes A motion was introduced by Commissioner Pratt, with an abstention from Temporary Commissioner Naylor to approve the February 11, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting minutes. Motion carried 2-0. Public Hearings Conditional Use Permit – 4039 Scheuneman Road – Gem Lake Hills Golf Course Graduate Community Planner CJ Sycks summarized the Conditional use Permit amendment request from the Gem Lake Hills Golf Course. The applicant is requesting an amendment to an existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the Gem Lake Hills Golf Course at 4039 Scheuneman Road. The applicant is proposing to add a miniature golf putting course (putting course) and an ambient outdoor speaker system (speaker system) to the property. The proposed putting course will be constructed in the location of the old hitting cages, located on the east side of the property, near the primary building (the clubhouse) and parking lot. The hitting cages were removed in the spring of 2024. The clubhouse includes an open space with a bar, customer seating space, three bathrooms, and an office. There is also a maintenance department with an office, lawn mower and utility vehicle parking, and a large walk-in refrigerator. The active CUP was originally approved on March 14, 1964, and has been amended four (4) times since then. The most recent amendment was approved on February 20, 1989. CUPs were formerly referred to as Special Use Permits (SUPs). The subject property consists of multiple parcels located between the BNSF Railroad and Goose Lake Road/County Road 14, and between Goose Lake Road/County Road 14 and Scheuneman Road in the northeast area of the City. The primary address and entrance to the golf course is 4039 Scheuneman Road. Gem Lake Hills Golf Course is roughly 57.4 acres in size. The properties include two executive 9-hole golf courses, a clubhouse, and a parking lot. In a narrative provided by the applicant and included in the Meeting Packet, the applicant states that the addition of a putting course will provide a recreational option for all ages and will increase the appeal of their facility. They state that the putting course will be designed to minimize any potential impact on the environment and will adhere to all zoning regulations. The site area is approximately 19,000 square feet in size. In addition, a new deck is planned to be built on the west side of the building, near the putting course. The deck can be permitted with a building permit. The applicants anticipate an additional 30% increase in golf “rounds” played on the property (putting course and golf rounds). They anticipate an increase in visitors for the putting course, however, putting course visitors tend to arrive together in one vehicle compared to golfers arriving alone in individual vehicles, due to the nature of the games and the audiences. City of Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 11, 2025 2 The proposed speaker system will be used to provide background music and announcements. The applicant states that it will maintain appropriate volume levels and will abide by all noise ordinances. There will be between 12 and 18 speakers installed on the putting course. The speakers will be placed in a way that allows contained volume for patrons to hear music, while maintaining a quiet environment for the nearby neighborhoods. While the applicant is uncertain of the exact decibel levels at this time, they anticipate that it could reach 60-70 decibels. The system will allow the operators to set a maximum volume that cannot be exceeded. Ordinance No. 131 regulates conditional use permits in section 17.5. The criteria that need to be reviewed and measured are: 1) Adjacent Uses, 2) Air and Water Quality, 3) Traffic Generations, 4) Public Safety and Health, 5) Area Aesthetics, 6) Economic Impact on the Entire Area, 7) Consistency with the Comprehensive Municipal Plan, and 8) Anticipated Duration of the Conditional or Interim Use. These criteria were discussed and the notes on the topics can be found on the City Planner memo available. One of the concerns of the Commission Members was the noise. They were reassured that it would not be a problem. Commission Chair Cummings would like to suggest to the Council the addition of timing to the CUP request. This would allow the city to go back in a year or however long they would like to suggest ensuring that all the conditions of the CUP are continuing to be met and there have been no major complaints. Commission Member Pratt introduced a motion to open the public hearing on the CUP request at 7:29 p.m., seconded by Temporary Commission Member Naylor. Motion carried 3-0. The public had no comment. Commission Member Pratt introduced a motion to close the public hearing on the CUP request at 7:30 p.m., seconded by Temporary Commission Member Naylor. Motion carried 3-0. Commission Member Pratt introduced a motion to recommend approval with the conditions listed and suggestion of a time limit as a conversation point to the City Council, seconded by Commission Chair Cummings. Motion carried 3-0. Open Items for Commission Members to Bring Up None. Future Meetings City Council Meeting, Tuesday, March 18, 2025, at Heritage Hall, and Planning Commission Meeting, Tuesday, April 8, 2025, at Heritage Hall. Attendance Inquiry Commissioner Cummings surveyed the Commission to see if any of the members would have any issues attending the April 8 meeting. At that time those in attendance had no conflicts. Adjournment There being no further business, following a motion from Commissioner Pratt, seconded by Temporary Commissioner Naylor, the meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melissa Lawrence City of Gem Lake County of Ramsey State of Minnesota Resolution No. 2025-007 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO DISTRIBUTE A PORTION OF THE CHARITABLE GAMBLING FUNDS TO THE WHITE BEAR LAKE AREA FOOD SHELF. WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake participates in the distribution of charitable gambling funds received from the Country Lounge WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake distributes these funds to local 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake City Council suggested a donation at their February 18, 2025 meeting in support of the White Bear Lake Area Food Shelf. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota, the City Treasurer is authorized to send $1,500.00 to support the White Bear Lake Area Food Shelf for the month of March 2025. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced by Councilmember __________ and supported by Councilmember __________, and upon vote being taken thereon, the resolution passed with a vote of _____ in favor and _____ against. ATTEST I, Melissa Lawrence, the duly qualified Acting City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. March 18, 2025 Melissa Lawrence, Acting City Clerk Date City of Gem Lake Interim Use Application – Gem Lake Gardens - Page 1 of 1 City of Gem Lake Heritage Hall 4200 Otter Lake Road | Gem Lake, MN 55110 651-747-2790/92 | 651-747-2795 (fax) E-mail city@gemlakemn.org Zoning Request Interim Use Permit – Gem Lake Gardens Expires March 15th of Each Year New Renewal Property Information Property Owner: Address: City: State: Zip: Home Phone: Cell Phone: Applicant Information Applicant: Address: City: State: Zip: Home Phone: Cell Phone: List of Fertilizers, Pesticides and Other Agricultural Chemicals Being Used Data Practices Advisory (Tennessen Warning) I understand that some of the information provided on this form will be public data. Public data is available to anyone who makes a request for such information. Under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, your address, email and/or telephone number are private data. You may choose not to provide some or all of this private data, but it may cause your Conditional Use Permit request to be denied. By completing this information, you are consenting to allow the City of Gem Lake staff to share this information in order to administer Gem Lake Ordinances regarding Conditional Use Permitting. Please sign below to affirm that you have read this notice. Applicant Signature: Date: Office Use Only Permit No. City Council: 3rd Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. at Heritage Hall, 4200 Otter Lake Road. City Council Meeting Date: Conditional Use Permit paid: Cash Check Check No.: Receipt No.: Date Permit Granted: Date Permit Denied: Conditions / Requirements CITY OF GEM LAKE Claims For Payment Period Ending:3/18/2025 Signatures Approving Claims Date of Approval Gretchen Artig-Swomley, Mayor Ben Johnson, Council Jim Lindner, Council Len Cacioppo, Council Joshua Patrick, Council Tom Kelly, Treasurer Fund Totals $ Amount General Fund 42,284.97 Parks & Playgrounds 2004 Debt Service Fund 2006 Debt Service Fund 2015 Debt Service Fund 2018 Debt Service Fund Improvement Fund Scheuneman Road Improvements Hoffman Road Improvements 602-Sewer Fund 7,567.19 601-Water Fund Investment Trust Fund Total All Funds 49,852.16 Claims for Payment Check Numbers 12744 through 12798 CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF GEM LAKE CHECK DATE 03/18/2025 - 03/18/2025 Check Date Check Vendor Name Amount Bank GEN GENERAL CHECKING 03/18/2025 12774 ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES, LLC 6,541.00 03/18/2025 12775 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 791.80 03/18/2025 12776 CINTAS 31.95 03/18/2025 12777 GDO Law 50.00 03/18/2025 12778 Gopher State One Call 4.05 03/18/2025 12779 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, 16.13 03/18/2025 12780 INVOICE CLOUD INC 581.25 03/18/2025 12781 Kelly & Lemmons, PA 675.60 03/18/2025 12782 LB CARLSON, LLP 2,500.00 03/18/2025 12783 LMC INSURANCE TRUST 4,734.00 03/18/2025 12784 Melissa Lawrence 9.31 03/18/2025 12785 METRO-INET 1,293.00 03/18/2025 12786 Metropolitan Council 4,281.89 03/18/2025 12787 Midwest Sewer Services 3,281.25 03/18/2025 12788 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 1,194.79 03/18/2025 12789 Nykanen Inspections LCC 40.00 03/18/2025 12790 Press Publications 88.00 03/18/2025 12791 RED LILY 90.00 03/18/2025 12792 SEH 6,603.17 03/18/2025 12793 SQUEEGEE MAGIC 326.12 03/18/2025 12794 TKDA 4,173.36 03/18/2025 12795 Trade Press Inc 398.00 03/18/2025 12796 White Bear Lake Emergency Foo 1,500.00 03/18/2025 12797 White Bear Township 9,809.55 03/18/2025 12798 Xcel Energy 837.94 GEN TOTALS: Total of 25 Checks:49,852.16 Less 0 Void Checks:0.00 Total of 25 Disbursements:49,852.16 03/18/2025 08:43 AM Page:1/1 CHECK DISBURSEMENT REPORT FOR CITY OF GEM LAKE CHECK DATE 03/18/2025 - 03/18/2025 Check Date Bank Account Check #Payee Description Accoun t Dept Amount Fund: 100 GENERAL 03/18/2025 GEN 12774 ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES, LLC IRRIGATION INSTALLATION 40319 41940 6,541.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12775 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES NOAA EMERGENCY RADIOS 40200 41400 791.80 03/18/2025 GEN 12776 CINTAS CINTAS 40319 41940 31.95 03/18/2025 GEN 12777 GDO Law GDO LEGAL SERVICES 41304 41600 50.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12779 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC INNOVATIVE 40200 41400 16.13 03/18/2025 GEN 12780 INVOICE CLOUD INC INVOICE CLOUD 40309 41500 581.25 03/18/2025 GEN 12781 Kelly & Lemmons, PA GENERAL COUNSEL 40304 41600 675.60 03/18/2025 GEN 12782 LB CARLSON, LLP PROGRESS BILLING FOR AUDIT 40301 41500 2,500.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12783#LMC INSURANCE TRUST MUNICIPAL LIABILITY 40361 41900 1,238.00 AUTOMOBILE LIABLITY 40363 41900 90.00 BOND 40365 41900 130.00 FIRST PARTY CYBER 40362 41900 446.00 PROPERTY INSURANCE 40362 41940 2,830.00 Check GEN 12783 Total for Fund 100 GENERAL 4,734.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12784 Melissa Lawrence MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MARCH 2025 40331 41900 5.25 FEBRUARY 2025 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 40331 41900 4.06 Check GEN 12784 Total for Fund 100 GENERAL 9.31 03/18/2025 GEN 12785 METRO-INET I.T SUPPORT 40309 41900 1,160.00 METRO INET ADOBE 40309 41900 133.00 Check GEN 12785 Total for Fund 100 GENERAL 1,293.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12788 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & IN 2024 2ND QUARTER SURCHARGE RE ISSUED 32220 00000 1,077.98 2024 3RD QUARTER SURCHARGE RE ISSUED 32220 00000 116.81 Check GEN 12788 Total for Fund 100 GENERAL 1,194.79 03/18/2025 GEN 12789 Nykanen Inspections LCC FEBRUARY 2025 INSPECTIONS 32213 00000 40.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12790 Press Publications PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 40351 41900 88.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12791 RED LILY WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 40300 41940 90.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12792 SEH ENGINEERING SERVICES 40303 41910 6,603.17 03/18/2025 GEN 12793 SQUEEGEE MAGIC SQUEGEE MAGIC 40319 41940 326.12 03/18/2025 GEN 12794 TKDA 2025 PLANNING 40308 41910 4,173.36 03/18/2025 GEN 12795 Trade Press Inc NEWSLETTERS 40352 41900 398.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12796 White Bear Lake Emergency Food She MARCH 2025 DONATION 22001 00000 1,500.00 03/18/2025 GEN 12797#White Bear Township TREASURER SERVICES 40329 41500 4,797.50 2/3/25-2/27/25 POSTAGE 40322 41900 280.50 2/6/25-3/7/25 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 40319 41940 1,331.50 2/3/25-3/7/25 EQUIPMENT SERVICES 40319 41900 912.50 1/10/25-1/24/25TREASURER SERVICES 40329 41500 1,045.00 1/2/25-1/30/25 POSTAGE 40322 41900 272.55 1/8/25-2/3/25 PUBLIC WORKS 40319 41940 700.00 1/8/25-2/3/25 EQUIPMENT 40319 41900 470.00 03/18/2025 08:44 AM Page:1/2 CHECK DISBURSEMENT REPORT FOR CITY OF GEM LAKE CHECK DATE 03/18/2025 - 03/18/2025 Check Date Bank Account Check #Payee Description Accoun t Dept Amount Fund: 100 GENERAL Check GEN 12797 Total for Fund 100 GENERAL 9,809.55 03/18/2025 GEN 12798#Xcel Energy XCEL ELECTRIC SERVICE 40381 41940 408.29 XCEL GAS SERVICE 40383 41940 267.97 XCEL STREET LIGHTS 40386 43122 161.68 Check GEN 12798 Total for Fund 100 GENERAL 837.94 Total For Fund: 100 42,284.97 Fund: 602 SEWER UTILITY FUND 03/18/2025 GEN 12778 Gopher State One Call LOCATES 40319 43200 4.05 03/18/2025 GEN 12786 Metropolitan Council WASTE WATER APRIL 2025 11500 00000 4,281.89 03/18/2025 GEN 12787 Midwest Sewer Services 2024 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS 40400 43200 3,281.25 Total For Fund: 602 7,567.19 Report Total:49,852.16 '#'-INDICATES CHECK DISTRIBUTED TO MORE THAN ONE DEPARTMENT 03/18/2025 08:44 AM Page:2/2 1 BARNETT PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this _____ day of ________________________, 2025, is by and between the City of Gem Lake, whose primary address is 4200 Otter Lake Road, Gem Lake, Minnesota 55110, Ramsey County, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, (the “City”), and Barnett Properties, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, whose primary address is 3610 North Hwy 61, Gem Lake, Minnesota 55110 (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of two parcels of real property situated in the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, legally described as follows, see attached Exhibit A; (the Property);and WHEREAS, the Developer proposes to construct a new building to replace the existing structure located on parcel A and described on Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Developer as part of it’s plan to redevelop parcels A and B has requested permission to adjust the common boundary lines shared by parcels A and B; and WHEREAS, Developer has prepared final plans and specifications intended to comply with the regulations established with by the City of Gem Lake; and WHEREAS, the City believes the proposed development of the property and fulfillment of this Agreement are in the best interest of the City of Gem Lake; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute §462.358 authorizes the City to enter into a Development Agreement, secured by a performance guarantee for completion of all such improvements following final approval by the City Council and prior to the recording of the final plat at Ramsey County; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer have entered into this Development Agreement to document their respective rights and responsibilities with respect to the construction of the Improvements; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 2 ARTICLE I Definitions Section 1.1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: "Agreement" means this Development Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified, amended or supplemented. "Articles and Sections" mentioned by number only are the respective Articles and Sections of this Agreement so numbered. "Certificate of Completion" means the certification provided to the Developer upon satisfactory completion of the Improvements. "City" means the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota. "Construction Plans" means the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents prepared by registered architects or engineers for all construction work to be performed by the Developer on the Property, including all on-site improvements to be performed, installed or constructed upon the Property, pursuant to this Agreement. Such plans shall, at a minimum, include the level of detail required for issuance of building permits by the City. "Developer's Improvements" means those improvements to or serving the Property to be performed by the Developer, as more fully set forth under this Agreement. "Event of Default" shall have the meaning set forth in of this Agreement. "Improvements" means the site preparation, utility installation, storm water improvements, and approved Construction Plans for Improvements to be constructed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. "Minnesota Environmental Rights Act" means the statutes located at Minnesota Statutes Sections 116B.01 et seq., as amended. "Parties" means the Developer and the City. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Unavoidable Delays" means delays, outside of the control of the Party claiming its occurrence, which are the direct result of strikes, other labor troubles, material shortages, unusually severe or prolonged bad weather, Acts of God, fire or other casualty to the Improvements, litigation commenced by third parties which, by injunction or other similar judicial action, directly results in delays, or acts of any federal, state or local governmental unit (other than the City) which directly result in delays, or any other similar causes. 3 ARTICLE II Representations And Warranties Section 2.1. Representations and Warranties by the City. The City represents and warrants that: (a) The City is a public body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, has the power to enter into this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder. Section 2.2. Representations and Warranties by the Developer. The Developer represents and warrants that: (a) The Developer is a limited liability company duly organized and authorized to transact business in the State, is not in violation of any provisions of its corporation or the laws of the State, has power to enter into this Agreement and has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by proper action of the corporation. (b) The Developer will construct the Improvements upon the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and all local, state and federal laws and regulations (including, but not limited to, environmental, zoning, building code and public health laws and regulations). (c) It is the intent and understanding of the parties that upon completion of the Improvements, including 34,000 square foot building, upon the Property, that the Developer will use the properties for the sale and service of new and used vehicles including automobiles and support utility vehicles. (d) It is the intent and understanding of the parties that the redevelopment of the property will occur pursuant to the terms and conditions of the City of Gem Lake resolution no. ____________________ approving a minor subdivision for the Property in the City of Gem Lake, resolution no. ______________________ approving a zoning compliance permit for the property. (e) The Developer has received no notice or communication from any local, state or federal official that the proposed activities of the Developer may be or will be in violation of any environmental law or regulation. The Developer is aware of no violation of any local, state or federal environmental law, regulation or review procedure, or of any facts which would give any person a valid claim under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act. (f) The Developer will use its best efforts to construct the Improvements in accordance with all local, state or federal energy conservation laws or regulations. 4 (g) The Developer will obtain, in a timely manner, all required permits, licenses and approvals, and meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations which must be obtained or met before the Improvements may be lawfully constructed. (h) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement is prevented or limited by, or in conflict with or will result in a breach of the terms, conditions or provisions of any evidence of indebtedness, agreement or instrument of whatever nature to which the Developer is now a party or by which it is bound, or will constitute a default under any of the foregoing. (i) The Developer shall prepare final plans for City review and approval. (j) The Developer shall provide to the City, upon execution of this Agreement and prior to the commencement of construction of the Improvements, proof of financing in an amount and from a source found sufficient by the City to assure the Developer's ability to construct the Improvements contemplated by this Agreement. ARTICLE III Construction Of Improvements Section 3.1. Construction of Improvements. The Developer will construct the Improvements on the Property in accordance with the approved Construction Plans and at all times during the term of this Agreement will operate and maintain, preserve and keep the Improvements or cause the Improvements to be operated, maintained, preserved and kept in good repair and condition. Section 3.2. Construction Plans. (a) The Developer shall cause to be constructed, at his cost, the Required Improvements according to City ordinances. All of the Required Improvements shall be approved by the City prior to construction and shall be consistent with approved minor subdivision, the Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Landscaping Plan, the Development Utility Plan, Building Plans, City Resolution Number _________________, approving a zoning compliance permit for the property and City Resolution Number ___________________, approving a minor subdivision for the property as well as any requirement imposed by the City Engineer. (b) The Developer shall have no claim against the City and its officers and employees for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from subdivision approval and development. The Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents and employees from any claim, demand, suit, action or other proceeding whatsoever by any person for any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person resulting from any actions of the Developer, or their agents or contractors. Until all of 5 Developer’s obligations under this Agreement are fulfilled, the Developer shall provide and maintain public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise. Limits for bodily injury or death shall not be less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence. Limits for property damage shall not be less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional named insured on said policy, and the Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City prior to the commencement of the Required Improvements. The insurance policy obtained by the Developer is subject to City approval. In the event that the City is held liable to a third party by a court of competent jurisdiction for damages and the insurance obtained by Developer for any reason fails to cover the City, the Developer shall be liable under this Agreement for any and all costs incurred or damages claimed against the City. (c) This Development Agreement cannot be assigned or transferred without prior written approval of the City. (d) Any breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of the issuance of any building permit. (e) There is no intent to benefit any third parties and third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. (f) The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense or enforcement of this Agreement due to actions or inactions of Developer including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys’ fees. (g) If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Agreement. (h) It is agreed that the City has the right, privilege and authority as a condition precedent to the approval of the plans and specifications and approval of Final Plat, to prescribe design requirements for any Improvements within the Plat. (i) The provisions of this Section relating to approval, rejection and resubmission of corrected Construction Plans shall continue to apply until the Construction Plans have been approved by the City. Approval of the Construction Plans by the City shall not relieve the Developer of any obligation to comply with the terms and provisions of this Agreement or the provisions of applicable federal, State and local laws, ordinances and regulations, nor shall approval of the Construction Plans by the City be deemed to constitute a waiver of any Event of Default. The Construction Plans shall be deemed approved by the City unless rejected in writing within thirty (30) days after receipt from the Developer by the City with a statement of the City's reasons for such rejection. 6 (j) If the Developer desires to make any material change in the Construction Plans after their approval by the City, the Developer shall submit the proposed change, in writing, to the City for its approval. If the Construction Plans, as modified by the proposed change, conform to the requirements of this Agreement and such changes do not materially alter the nature, quality or exterior appearance of the Improvements, the City shall approve the proposed change and notify the Developer in writing of its approval. Section 3.3. Commencement and Completion of Construction. The Developer will provide a schedule in writing outlining in detail the proposed schedule which must be approved prior to the start of construction. The construction shall be commenced by _____________________. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, and contingent upon Developer securing adequate financing, the Developer shall commence construction of the Improvements by. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Developer shall have substantially completed the construction of the Improvements within ______ days following the actual commencement of construction, unless amended by the parties. Appropriate extension of time for completion shall be made for time lost as a result of Unavoidable Delays or other factors approved by the City; provided that within twenty (20) days after the occurrence of an Unavoidable Delay or other factor, the Developer shall have notified the City in writing of such occurrence. Until construction of the Improvements has been completed, the Developer shall make reports to the City, in such detail and at such times as may reasonably be requested by the City, as to the actual progress of the Developer with respect to construction of the Improvements. The Developer shall allow designated representatives of the City to enter upon the Property during the construction of the Improvements to inspect such construction. Section 3.4. Certificate of Completion. (a) Promptly after completion of the Improvements in accordance with those provisions of the Agreement relating solely to the obligations of the Developer to construct the Improvements (including the dates for beginning and completion thereof), and upon approval of the Improvements by the City, the City will furnish the Developer with an appropriate instrument so certifying (the Certificate of Completion). Such certification by the City shall be a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in the Agreement with respect to the obligations of the Developer and its successors and assigns, to construct the Improvements and the dates for the beginning and completion thereof. Such certification and such determination shall not constitute evidence of compliance with or satisfaction of any obligation of the City to any Holder of a Mortgage, or any insurer of a Mortgage, securing money loaned to finance the Improvements, or any part thereof. (b) If the City shall refuse or fail to provide any certification in accordance with the provisions of this Section, the City shall, within thirty (30) days after written request by the Developer, provide the Developer with a written statement, indicating in detail in what respects the Developer has failed to complete the Improvements in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, or is otherwise in default, and what measures or acts will 7 be necessary, in the opinion of the City, for the Developer to take or perform in order to obtain such certification. ARTICLE IV The Developer will construct and install, at Developer’s expense, the following improvements identified under Parts A and B (“Developer’s Improvements”), according to the terms and conditions stated herein. Developer’s Improvements (Part A) Exhibit B Section 4.1. Site Grading. The Developer shall do all site grading associated with the construction plans approved by the City. Upon completion of all grading, Developer’s engineer shall certify in writing that the site it graded to the approved plans. Also, the Developer agrees prior to commencement of grading to call a pre-construction meeting between the City, Developer and contractors for the site grading. Section 4.2. Soil Erosion and Tree Protection. The Developer shall control soil erosion ensuring: (a)Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures, as required by the City, shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. (b) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be exposed at any one period of time. Section 4.3. Iron Monument Placement. The Developer shall place iron monuments at the west terminus and east terminus of the common boundary line be established between parcel A and B. An iron monument shall be placed after all street/utilities (public and private) and lawn grading has been completed. in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Section 4.4. Street and Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for street and storm sewer maintenance, including curbs, boulevards, sod, street sweeping and storm sewer cleaning until 100% of the homes within the development are constructed upon the lots. The City’s Consulting Engineering will conduct site visits to ensure compliance. Staff will contact the Developer in writing and give a reasonable timeframe to meet compliance. If this is not met, the City will sweep the streets and invoice the Developer for time spent. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when the street becomes impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the developer shall maintain a smooth driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary streets. Performance shall be guaranteed by the financial guarantee recited herein. Section 4.5. Storm Water Infrastructure. The Developer shall construct and dedicate all storm water infrastructure required by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for storm sewer 8 cleaning and maintenance as reasonably required by the City, prior to completion of the development. The Developer grants the City the right to enter upon the property to perform all functions required under this Agreement and City Codes. Performance shall be guaranteed by the Performance Guarantee set forth under this Agreement. Section 4.6. Approvals and Permits. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all necessary approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading and prior to the construction of Developer Improvements. Section 4.7. Utilities. The Developer shall arrange for all gas, telephone, cable television (if available) and electric utilities to be installed to serve the development. Developer shall install water meters in each of the homes constructed according to City specifications. Section 4.8. Private Easement. Developer shall prepare and record a private access agreement allowing 3700 Hwy 61 access to Hwy 61 as required by City of Gem Lake resolution no. _______________ approving a minor subdivision. The city retains for it to approve the terms and conditions of the private access agreement prior to its execution recording. Section 4.9. City Engineer. The City shall provide a licensed professional engineer, or their duly authorized representative to oversee, at the Developer’s expense, the Developer’s Improvements (except for the building to be constructed) identified in this Agreement until such improvements are completed and accepted by the City. The City shall conduct an inspection within forty-eight (48) hours of notice or request by the Developer. The forty-eight (48) hour notice shall exclude weekends and holidays. Section 4.10. Fence Plan. Developer may construct the proposed fence, shown on the site plan, with said fencing meeting the requirements of Section 16.13 and building type template 15a. Estimated cost of Developer’s Improvements for Part A, the description and completion dates are as follows: See Exhibit B, Part A. Section 4.11. Finance. (a) As financial security, Developer shall furnish the City with a Letter of Credit or other security in a City approved format in an amount equal to One Hundred Twenty-Five Percent (125%) of the improvement contract amount. The Developer’s financial security shall be used to guarantee Developer’s completion of all of the Required Improvements, compliance with this Agreement, and compliance with the terms and conditions of approval City Resolution Number ________________ approving a Zoning Compliance permit and City Resolution Number __________________ approving a minor subdivision. Said surety shall be immediately available for City’s use to complete part or all of the construction in a timely and satisfactory manner, as determined in the sole discretion of City. Said surety shall remain in full force and effect until completion and acceptance of the Required Improvements based on the sole determination of City. (b) The Developer agrees that the terms of the financial security shall be deemed to have been violated if the Developer fails to perform any of the terms of this 9 Agreement in the manner required by the City. City shall provide Developer ten (10) days written notice of any violation of the terms of the Agreement. Determination of a violation of the terms of the Agreement shall be in the sole discretion of the City, which shall not be unreasonable. The financial security shall be available for use by the City to remedy any violation of the terms of this Agreement, subject to the ten (10) days written notice to Developer and Developer’s failure to rectify same within that period of time. (c) WAC and SAC charges shall be paid upon issuing the building permit. (d) All plumbing permit fees, electrical permit fees and any other permit fees required for new construction shall be paid at the time of the building permit application. (e) The Developer shall deposit with the City _________________________________ ($__________), from which any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, in any way related to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, planning and engineering fees, legal fees, City staff time, cost of acquisition of easements, if any, shall be paid. Costs for City staff time expended in conjunction with this Agreement are expected to equal two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the construction cost of the Required Improvements. Said fee can be increased or reduced in the sole discretion of the City, should staff time required vary dramatically from this estimate. (f) All current and outstanding bills and invoices from the City are to be paid before start of grading and construction. Developer’s Improvements (Part B) Section 4.12. Construction of City Maintained Improvements. (a) The Developer shall install all utilities and storm water facilities (sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer) in accordance with the approved storm water/utility plan and specifications that has been approved by the City and/or the City’s consulting engineer. Also, the Developer agrees prior to commencement of construction to call a pre-construction meeting between the City, Developer and contractors for the utility construction. Developer further agrees to coordinate its contractors’ activities with the City for inspections. If improvements are installed without required City inspections, the City may require that such improvements be removed and reconstructed. City inspector shall be notified at least forty- eight (48) hours prior to any and/or all construction activity. (b) The Developer shall be responsible for securing all necessary approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of streets, trails/sidewalks, utilities, etc. and prior to the Developer awarding construction contracts. (c) Inspection. All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The City shall provide a licensed professional engineer, or their duly authorized representative, to oversee, at the Developer’s expense, the Developer’s Improvements 10 identified in this Agreement until such improvements are completed and accepted by the City. The City shall conduct an inspection within forty-eight (48) hours of notice or request by the Developer. The forty-eight (48) hour notice shall exclude weekends and holidays. (d) Easements. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, as part of the subdivision and at no cost to the City, all permanent drainage and utility easements at a minimum of 10 feet abutting all lot lines resulting from the subdivision of the property and the storm sewer line as determined by the City. It shall be Developer's responsibility to obtain any and all temporary easements as may be necessary for Developer's performance under this Agreement. (e) As-built drawings of all improvements identified in Part B shall be filed with the City Engineer. Such as-built drawings shall show the date of construction and shall be drawn in such a manner and on such materials to meet the standards of the City available in the City engineer's office. As-built drawings must be completed and filed in the City engineer's office within six (6) months of the day of the completion of such improvement. If as-built drawings are not filed within the time period specified the City engineer may be authorized to conduct surveys and complete the drawings and all of the costs pursuant thereto shall be paid by the Developer. Estimated cost of Developer’s Improvements, the description and completion dates for Part B are as follows: See Exhibit B, Part B. Section 4.13. Engineering. (a) The Developer shall cause to be constructed, at its cost and its own risk, the Required Improvements according to City standards. All of the Grading and Drainage Improvements shall be approved by the City and shall be consistent with the Final Subdivision and the Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control Plans approved __________________, subject to any revisions required by the City Engineer. The Developer also agrees to adhere to all terms and conditions as set forth by the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD). Developer shall provide a copy of the RWMWD Permit to the City prior to the commencement of construction. (b) Developer or their agents or assigns, shall comply with all provisions of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including but not limited to keeping the public streets clear of any soil, earth or debris resulting from work done by Developer or his agents or assigns. Any such materials must be promptly removed and in no event shall they be present more than twenty-four (24) hours after placement. Failure to comply with this provision will result in the City undertaking this work with costs to be reimbursed by Developer pursuant to this Agreement. (c) The Developer shall cause to be performed to the City Engineer's satisfaction all finish grading. During this period the Developer shall prevent erosion by wind and water to the pursuant to the approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and to the City Engineer's satisfaction. The Developer shall prepare an as-built survey which verifies elevations of each structure constructed as each parcel is developed. 11 (d) The Developer shall install survey monuments consistent with the approved subdivision. Said monuments shall be installed and certified by a registered land surveyor. (e) Developer shall instruct his engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to ensure the project is constructed in accordance with approved plans and specifications. In addition, the City’s Engineer, at Developer’s expense, shall also inspect the construction of Required Improvements for the purpose of certifying the same and recommending acceptance by City. Developer shall also complete construction staking for the project at Developer’s expense. Section 4.14. Miscellaneous. (a) The Developer represents that the Subdivision and Required Improvements will comply with all City, County, Metropolitan, State and Federal laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, noise ordinances, and environmental regulations; including wetland impact and mitigation. Developer shall obtain all necessary permits and consents for the Required Improvements including, but not limited to, any permits required by the Minnesota Department of Health for water main extensions, any permits required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for sanitary sewer main extension, any permits required by the Metropolitan Council Waste Water Services Division for connections to sanitary sewer lines, any permits required by the Ramsey-Washington Watershed District for grading and storm water discharge; and any permits or approvals necessary to properly comply with Wetland regulations. Developer shall reimburse the City for any costs or expenses incurred by the City due to the need for any permits or consents and shall be responsible for compliance with any other requirements imposed by the agencies in question. (b) Developer shall comply with the City Engineer’s recommendations, including the creation of a storm water retention pond planting plan that meets with the approval of Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District staff and City staff. Said approval shall occur after the execution of this Agreement. (c) Prior to the commencement of any work, Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting to be held at the Gem Lake City Hall at a date and time agreeable to City. Said meeting shall include all parties concerned, including, but not limited to, City staff, Developer’s engineer, Developer’s contractor(s), Developer’s builder(s), and if necessary, representatives of Ramsey-Washington Watershed District. The purpose of this meeting will be to review the work program for construction to achieve a coordinated approach between all parties involved and shall include a detailed schedule in writing provided by the Developer. (d) Developer warrants all work required to be performed against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its final completion and approval by City. All landscaping including, but not limited to, trees, shrubs, grass seed, sod, native plantings and aquatic plantings, if any, be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease 12 free for twenty-four (24) months from the time of planting. Any replacements shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for twenty-four (24) months from the time of planting. Developer shall post maintenance bonds or other security acceptable to City to secure the warranties. (e) The action or inaction of City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. City’s failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. (f) This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors or assigns, as the case may be. All terms and conditions contained herein shall run with the land and shall bind the Developer, its successors and assigns. (g) Developer shall complete all the obligations of the zoning certificate issued by the City on _________________, which shall include conditional use permit. (h) Developer shall complete all the requirements for issuance of the conditional use/zoning certificate. (i) Developer understands that the construction hours with the city of Gem Lake are Monday-Saturday, 7:00 A.M.-7:00 P.M. (j) Required notices to Developer shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered or mailed by certified mail to the following address: Barnett Properties LLC 3610 North Hwy 61 Gem Lake, MN 55110 (k) Required notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered or mailed by certified mail, in care of the city administrator, to the following address: City of Gem Lake 4200 Otter Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 ARTICLE V Additional Developer Obligations Section 5.1. Storm Sewer Infrastructure Maintenance. Storm sewer infrastructure shall be maintained by the developer pursuant to the conditions approved by the City. Developer to submit a 13 maintenance agreement and Maintenance Plan for all storm water facilities and wetland mitigation areas. ARTICLE VI Performance Guarantees Section 6.1. Developer’s Improvements. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer’s Improvements identified in Parts A and B of Article IV. Developer guarantees workmanship and materials. Section 6.2. City Maintained Improvements. Upon the City's written final acceptance of the City maintained improvements lying within the public easements or right-of-way, to occur upon acceptance of such improvements, a two-year warranty bond shall be provided to the City by the Developer based on 25% of the final construction costs for Developer’s Improvements identified in Part B of Article IV unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer. ARTICLE VII Recording And Release The Developer agrees that the terms of this Agreement shall be a covenant on the Property. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Agreement with the Ramsey County Recorder to give notice to future owners. This shall be recorded against the Property described on Exhibit A attached hereto. ARTICLE VIII Reimbursement Of Costs The Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in connection with this Agreement including, but not limited to, the actual costs of preparation of the plans and specifications for said improvements, engineering fees, legal fees, inspection fees, interest costs, costs of acquisition of necessary easements, if any, and any other costs incurred by the City relating to this Agreement and the installation of the aforementioned improvements. Furthermore, the Developer agrees to deposit with the City such sums reasonably required by the City and relating to the costs described in the preceding paragraph. The amounts of such deposits shall be as shown in the City Fee Schedule as adopted by City Code. Said amount shall bear no interest and the City shall have the right to pay all fees and expenses and costs which are the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement from the aforementioned escrow deposit. Any monies remaining after the payment of said fees and costs shall be returned to the Developer. Any disputes regarding said fees shall be resolved in accordance with Minnesota Statutes §§ 462.353 and 462.361. 14 All reimbursements from the City to Developer as set forth in this Agreement shall be made administratively, when possible, so that Developer will not be required to seek further City Council approval for such reimbursements. ARTICLE IX Building Permits And Certificates Of Occupancy No Certificate of Occupancy permit shall be issued for any house in the plat until the following have been completed: A. An as-built plan of all improvements shall be supplied to the City. The City Building Official may issue a stop work order for any violations relating to silt fencing, erosion control or tree protection. ARTICLE X Cleanup Developer shall promptly clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction by the Developer, its agents or assigns. Performance shall be guaranteed by the Performance Guarantee recited herein. City reserves the right to perform such work as necessary and will invoice all costs to Developer if not completed within the timeframe set by the City, its agents or assigns, in a written notice. The Developer shall be responsible for rubbish and/or construction debris blown off the Property. ARTICLE XI Ownership Of Improvements Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public right-of-way or easements shall become City property without further notice or action. The Developer shall schedule City inspections through the City Engineering Department a minimum of forty-eight (48) hours prior to constructing City maintained improvements within the public right-of-way or easements. Prior to acceptance by the City of the City maintained improvements lying within the public right-of-way or easements, the Developer shall provide evidence by sworn construction statement that all contractors who may be entitled to file mechanics liens have been paid. ARTICLE XII 15 Prohibitions Against Assignment And Transfer; Indemnification Section 12.1. Release and Indemnification Covenants. (a) The Developer releases from and covenants and agrees that the City, and the governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and the governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof, against any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about or resulting from any defect in the Improvements or Developer's Improvements. (b) Except for any willful misrepresentation or any negligent, willful or wanton misconduct of the following named parties, the Developer agrees to protect and defend the City, and the governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof, now and forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any claim, demand, suit, action or other proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising from this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby or the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and operation of the Improvements or Developer's Improvements and provided that such proceeding is based upon the acts of the Developer or of others acting on behalf or under the direction or control of the Developer. (c) The City, and the governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof shall not be liable for any damage or injury to the persons or property of the Developer, or its officers, agents, servants or employees or any other person who may be about the Property due to any act of negligence of any person, excluding the negligent acts or misconduct of the City, its agents or employees. (d) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the City contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the City and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant or employee of the City in the individual capacity thereof. ARTICLE XIII Insurance Section 13.1. Insurance. Developer and/or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain during and until two (2) years after the City has accepted the improvements (streets, trails/sidewalks & utilities) that were installed by the Developer identified in Part B of Article IV lying within the public right-of-way or easements, the following insurance: (a) Builder's risk insurance, written on the so-called "Builder's Risk - Completed Value Basis," in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the insurable value of the Improvements at the date of completion, and with coverage available in nonreporting form on the so called "all risk" form of policy; and 16 The policies of insurance required pursuant to clauses (a) and (b) above shall be in form and content satisfactory to the City and shall be placed with financially sound and reputable insurers licensed to transact business in the State. The policies of insurance shall name the City as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to any construction by the Developer or its subcontractors. The certificate shall contain an agreement of the insurer to give not less than thirty (30) days advance written notice to the City and the Developer in the event of cancellation of such policy or change affecting the coverage thereunder. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. ARTICLE XIV Events of Default Section 14.1. Events of Default Defined. The term "Event of Default" shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any failure by the Developer to substantially observe or perform any material covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement. Section 14.2. Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in this Agreement occurs, the City may take any one or more of the following actions after provision of thirty (30) days written notice to the Developer by the City of the Event of Default, but only if the Event of Default has not been cured within said thirty (30) days or, if the Event of Default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days, the Developer does not provide assurances to the City reasonably satisfactory to the City that the Event of Default will be cured as soon as reasonably possible: (a) Withhold the Certificate of Completion. (b) Refuse to issue building permits to any property within the plat until such time as such default has been inspected and corrected to the satisfaction of the City. (c) Perform the work of the Developer and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City within thirty (30) days. Failure to do so shall result in the City withholding any cash deposit, certified check, letter of credit, or any other form of Performance Guarantee of the Developer. (d) If the plat is a phase of a multi-phase preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied. (e) Take whatever action, including legal or administrative action, which may appear necessary or desirable to the City to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Developer under this Agreement and shall be entitled to collect any and all expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal, planning and litigation costs and expense. 17 Section 14.3. No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the City is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right or power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Section 14.4. No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. In the event any agreement should be breached by Developer and thereafter waived by the City, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. ARTICLE XV Additional Provisions Section 15.1. Incorporation by Reference. All City approved plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications and contracts for the improvements furnished and let pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this Agreement by reference as if fully set out herein. Section 15.2. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under the Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1, or at such other address with respect to either such Party as that Party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other as provided in this Section. Section 15.3. Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles and Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. Section 15.4. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of this Agreement. Section 15.5. Clerical Revisions. In the event that any technical or clerical revisions are needed in this document or if for any reason the County Recorder deems this Agreement un- recordable, the Developer shall cooperate with the City in the execution or amendment of any revised development agreement. Section 15.6. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants 18 running with the land. Notwithstanding the foregoing, individual homeowners shall not be obligated to perform Developer’s obligations hereunder. Section 15.7. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 15.8. Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 15.9. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements in accordance with the timetables set forth in this Development Agreement. The Developer may, however, request in writing an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases, if any, and the extended completion date. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf and the Developer has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf on or as of the date first above written. BARNETT PROPERTIES, LLC By: ___________________________ Its: ___________________________ By: ___________________________ Its: ___________________________ 19 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this _____ day of _____________________, 2025, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _________________________and ______________________, to me known to be the __________________ and _____________________ of Barnett Properties LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same on behalf of said company. Notary Public CITY OF GEM LAKE By: ___________________________ Gretchen Artig Swormley, Mayor ATTEST: By: ___________________________ Melissa Lawrence, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this _____ day of ________________________, 2025, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Gretchen Artig Swormley and Melissa Lawrence, to me known to be respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public (Parcel A) (Parcel B) Memorandum To: Gem Lake City Council Project Reference: Conditional Use Permit Amendment Request for 4039 Scheuneman Road Copies To: Melissa Lawrence, Clerk Matt Greer, Applicant TKDA Project No.: 22428.000 From: CJ Sycks, Planner Client No.: Evan Monson, Planner Date: March 12, 2025 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Amendment Request for 4039 Scheuneman Road MEETING DATE: March 18, 2025 LOCATION: 4039 Scheuneman Road (Parcel ID 273022120007) APPLICANT/OWNER: Matt Greer, General Manager of Gem Lake Hills Golf Course ZONING: Single Family Executive Residential (RX) ITEMS REVIEWED: Application and plans received on 02/10/2025 REVIEW PERIOD: 60-day period ends 04/18/2025 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting an amendment to an existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the Gem Lake Hills Golf Course at 4039 Scheuneman Road. The applicant is proposing to add a miniature golf putting course (putting course) and an ambient outdoor speaker system (speaker system) to the property. The proposed putting course will be constructed in the location of the old hitting cages, located on the east side of the property, near the primary building (the clubhouse) and parking lot. The hitting cages were removed in the spring of 2024. The clubhouse includes an open space with a bar, customer seating space, three bathrooms, and an office. There is also a maintenance department with an office, lawn mower and utility vehicle parking, and a large walk -in refrigerator. The active CUP was originally approved on March 14, 1964, and has been amended four (4) times since then. The most recent amendment was approved on February 20, 1989. CUPs were formerly referred to as Special Use Permits (SUPs). CUPs are first reviewed by the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing. The City Council reviews and acts on the request, following a recommendation from the Commission. The Planning Commission reviewed the request on 3/11/25. Their recommendation is located at the end of the report. Conditional Use Permit Amendment Request - 4039 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake City Council 3/18/2025 March 12, 2025 Page 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Description: The subject property consists of multiple parcels located between the BNSF Railroad and Goose Lake Road/County Road 14, and between Goose Lake Road/County Road 14 and Scheuneman Road in the northeast area of the City. The primary address and entrance to the golf course is 4039 Scheuneman Road. Gem Lake Hills Golf Course is roughly 57.4 acres in size. The properties include two executive 9-hole golf courses, a clubhouse, and a parking lot. Land Use: Golf Course Figure 1: Aerial of the site, from Ramsey County GIS Figure 2: Aerial of the site, from Ramsey County GIS, zoomed to the project area. Conditional Use Permit Amendment Request - 4039 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake City Council 3/18/2025 March 12, 2025 Page 3 EVALUATION OF REQUEST Applicant Narrative Miniature Golf Putting Course (Putting Course) In a narrative provided by the applicant and included in the Meeting Packet, the applicant states that the addition of a putting course will provide a recreational option for all ages and will increase the appeal of their facility. They state that the putting course will be designed to minimize any potential impact on the environment and will adhere to all zoning regulations. The site area is approximately 19,000 square feet in size. The landscaping within the putting course will be artificial turf, with areas of turf designed to look like sand. In addition, a new deck is planned to be built on the west side of the building, near the putting course. The applicants anticipate an additional 30% increase in golf “rounds” played on the property (putting course and golf rounds). They anticipate an increase in visitors for the putting course, however, putting course visitors tend to arrive together in one vehicle compared to golfers arriving alone in individual vehicles, due to the nature of the games and the audiences. Figure 3: Excerpt from Submitted Application Materials, Putting Course Layout Plan Ambient Outdoor Speaker System The proposed speaker system will be used to provide background music and announcements. The applicant states that it will maintain appropriate volume levels and will abide by all noise ordinances. There will be between 12 and 18 speakers installed on the putting course. The speakers will be placed in a way that allows contained volume for patrons to hear music, while maintaining a quiet environment for the nearby neighborhoods. While the Conditional Use Permit Amendment Request - 4039 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake City Council 3/18/2025 March 12, 2025 Page 4 applicant is uncertain of the exact decibel levels at this time, they anticipate that it could reach 60-70 decibels. The system will allow the operators to set a maximum volume that cannot be exceeded. Project Schedule The applicant provided a potential project schedule: • Deck construction will be completed within the next two weeks. • Putting course construction and speaker system installation will begin in March, contingent on weather. Ordinance Criteria Ordinance No. 131, Consolidated Land Use Ordinance, regulates Conditional Use Permits in Section 17.5. When reviewing a Conditional Use Permit application, the following criteria shall be reviewed and measured by the Planning Commission and City Council (17.5.2.1): 1. Adjacent Uses 2. Air and Water Quality 3. Traffic Generations 4. Public Safety and Health 5. Area Aesthetics 6. Economic Impact on the Entire Area 7. Consistency with the Comprehensive Municipal Plan 8. Anticipated Duration of the Conditional or Interim Use Criteria are shown below in italics, with staff evaluation following: 1. Adjacent Uses Based on the submittal, this criterion can be met with proper limits on speaker volume. The adjacent uses to Gem Lake Hills Golf Course are One Family Detached Dwellings. Adding a putting course within the boundary of the existing golf course property does not appear to impact the adjacent uses. Ordinance No. 86, Nuisance, defines a nuisance as, “all noises and vibrations that exceed the noise pollution standards found in Minnesota [Administrative Rule] Chapter 7030.” Based on Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7030, in a residential housing area during daytime hours (7am- 10pm), noise levels cannot exceed 65 decibels for more than 10 percent of the time or 60 decibels for more than 50 percent of the time. During nighttime hours (10pm-7am) noise levels cannot exceed 55 decibels and 50 decibels, respectively. The proposed speaker system must adhere to these standards to prevent the creation of nuisance. 2. Air and Water Quality Based on the submittal, this criterion is met. Surrounding air and water quality do not appear to be impacted by the proposed amendment. The Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO) was contacted and had no comments regarding this request. 3. Traffic Generations Based on the submittal, this criterion is met. The applicants state a 30% expected increase in golf rounds played, with the increase in rounds coming from visitors arriving on one vehicle together. 4. Public Safety and Health Based on the submittal, this criterion is met. The proposed amendment does not appear to impact the health and safety of the public. 5. Area Aesthetics Based on the submittal, this criterion is met. The proposed amendment to the CUP would not impact the aesthetics of the area negatively. Conditional Use Permit Amendment Request - 4039 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake City Council 3/18/2025 March 12, 2025 Page 5 6. Economic Impact on the Entire Area Based on the submittal, this criterion is met. The applicant states that the addition of a putting course would create an attraction for all ages in Gem Lake. The proposed amendment would allow for a positive economic impact on the area. 7. Consistency with the Comprehensive Municipal Plan Based on the submittal, this criterion is met. The Gem Lake 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property as “Recreational Open Space Land Use”. Section 5.4 designates 60 acres for the golf course, reducing the ability for expansion of the golf course beyond the existing footprint. Section 5.5.7 states, “By all accounts, the course is economically viable and is not projected to develop as a different use during this planning period. The City of Gem Lake desires that this golf course /recreational space use continue in the future.” The proposed amendment, allowing a putting course, would not change the use nor would it expand the footprint of the property. 8. Anticipated Duration of the Conditional or Interim Use There is no anticipated date of dissolution of this use at this time. Staff Comments The submitted materials were forwarded to staff and other agencies for comments: • VLAWMO (Watershed District) o There are no wetlands located within or near the proposed project area, so VLAWMO has no comments. • Building Inspector o The Metropolitan council SAC review included the putting green expansion only. The new outdoor seating area shall also be submitted for SAC review to the Met Council prior to permit issuance. • Engineer o No comments from Engineering. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission discussed traffic impacts, potential noise concerns, the location of the putting course, and the impact the additions may have on the community and existing patrons of the golf course. The Commission requests that the Council consider placing a time limit on the CUP to ensure compliance with the conditions of the permit. The proper tool to implement a time limit on a use would be an Interim Use Permit (IUP), as time limits are not allowed on a CUP. The Council should discuss with the City Attorney options for monitoring the use to ensure compliance with the CUP and with the city’s ordinances. The mayor appointed a temporary Commissioner, Brad Naylor, for the 3/11/25 meeting. Including Temporary Commissioner Naylor, three (3) commissioners were present. The recommendation from the Planning Commission is contingent on Council approval of the appointment of Brad Naylor. ACTION The City Council has the following options: 1. Approve the request, with or without conditions. 2. Deny the request, with findings for denial. 3. Table the request for further review/study. RECOMMENDATION Conditional Use Permit Amendment Request - 4039 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake City Council 3/18/2025 March 12, 2025 Page 6 The Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit Amendment for 4039 Scheuneman Road, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant is permitted to add a miniature golf putting course onto the site, consistent with the plans received by the City on February 10, 2025. 2. The applicant shall adhere to Gem Lake City Ordinance Number 86 (Nuisance), and Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7030 regarding noise pollution control. 3. All plans must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for SAC review prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The applicant shall obtain all necessary local permits prior to construction. 5. The applicant shall adhere to all other applicable local, state, and federal requirements. 6. The applicant shall pay all fees and escrows associated with this request. CIS:epm:lmf City of Gem Lake County of Ramsey State of Minnesota Resolution No. 2025-008 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 4039 SCHEUNEMAN ROAD, PARCEL ID 273022120007 WHEREAS, Matt Greer, on behalf of the property owner Gem Lake Hills LLC, made an application to request an amendment to an existing conditional use permit to allow for the construction of a miniature golf putting course and an ambient outdoor speaker system; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows: See Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly noticed public hearing on March 11, 2025, and determined that the proposed request meets the criteria for a conditional use permit, and voted to recommend approval of the request with conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Gem Lake, Ramsey County Minnesota, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit to allow for the construction of a miniature gold putting course and an ambient outdoor speaker system, located 4039 Scheuneman Road, Parcel ID 273022120007, based on the following findings: 1. Based on the applicant’s submittal, the request meets the requirements of the city’s Consolidated Land Use Ordinance (Ordinance No. 131). FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the following conditions of approval shall be met: 1. The applicant is permitted to add a miniature golf putting course onto the site, consistent with the plans received by the City on February 10, 2025. 2. The applicant shall adhere to Gem Lake City Ordinance Number 86 (Nuisance) and Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7030 regarding noise pollution control. 3. All plans must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for SAC review prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The applicant shall obtain all necessary local permits prior to construction. 5. The applicant shall adhere to all other applicable local, state, and federal requirements. 6. The applicant shall pay all fees and escrows associated with this request. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced by Councilmember __________ and supported by Councilmember __________, and upon vote being taken thereon, the resolution passed with a vote of _____ in favor and _____ against. ATTEST I, Melissa Lawrence, the duly qualified Acting City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. March 18, 2025 Melissa Lawrence, Acting City Clerk Date City of Gem Lake County of Ramsey State of Minnesota Resolution No. 2025-008 Attachment A: THE NORTH 40 RODS OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 40 RODS OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 WHICH LIES WEST AND WESTERLY OF THE CENTER LINE OF SCHUNEMAN ROAD SO-CALLED (FORMERLY ST. PAUL AND WHITE BEAR LAKE ROAD) WHICH ROAD RUNS NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY OVER AND THROUGH SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 BOTH OF SAID TRACTS BEING IN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 22 AND BEING SUBJECT TO PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING PARCELS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 58' WEST A DISTANCE OF 1342 FEET TO A POINT ON A SEMI-TANGENT ON SCHUNEMAN ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 26 DEGREES 54' WEST, DISTANCE 39.56 FEET; ON A SEMI- TANGENT OF SAID ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 7' WEST A DISTANCE OF 108.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 51' WEST A DISTANCE OF 183 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 7' EAST A DISTANCE OF 91.67 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 58' EAST A DISTANCE OF 198.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SUBJECT TO THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC IN SCHUNEMAN ROAD. RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2025 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan I Ramsey County, MN Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2025 Developed by the communities of Ramsey County In consultation with Tidal Basin Government Consulting Cover Photo Credit: Lyndsay Hicken Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan II Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... II 1. Introduction and Planning Process ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Plan Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Planning Process ................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Community Profile and Capabilities .......................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Geography and Topography ............................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Population and Demographics ............................................................................................................ 9 2.4 Social Vulnerability ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.5 Economy ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2.6 Community Services and Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 16 2.7 Critical Facilities ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.8 Land Use and Ownership .................................................................................................................. 18 2.9 Climate Change and Trends .............................................................................................................. 19 2.10 Community Capabilities Assessment .............................................................................................. 20 3. Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 26 3.2 Hazard Summary ............................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................. 28 3.4 Hazard Rankings ................................................................................................................................ 29 3.5 Community Hazard Rankings ............................................................................................................ 30 3.6 Dam/Levee Failure ............................................................................................................................ 31 3.7 Drought ............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.8 Floods ................................................................................................................................................ 42 3.9 Geologic Hazards ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.10 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.11 Summer Weather Hazards .............................................................................................................. 20 3.12 Tornado and Windstorm ................................................................................................................. 29 3.13 Winter Weather Hazards ................................................................................................................ 36 3.14 Human-Caused Hazards .................................................................................................................. 44 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan III 3.15 Infrastructure Failure ...................................................................................................................... 50 4. Hazard Mitigation Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 58 4.1 Plan Goals .......................................................................................................................................... 58 4.2 Strategy Development ...................................................................................................................... 58 4.3 2019 Mitigation Action Reporting ..................................................................................................... 58 4.4 Completed Actions ............................................................................................................................ 59 4.5 Cancelled Actions .............................................................................................................................. 59 4.6 2025 Mitigation Strategy Elements .................................................................................................. 60 4.7 Action Prioritization .......................................................................................................................... 60 4.8 2025 Hazard Mitigation Strategy ...................................................................................................... 61 5. Plan Implementation and Maintenance ............................................................................................... 107 5.1 Plan Implementation ...................................................................................................................... 107 5.2 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan ............................................................................... 108 Appendix A – Additional Emergency Management Actions ......................................................................... 1 Appendix B – Studies and References ........................................................................................................... 1 Appendix C – Sample Adoption .................................................................................................................... 1 Appendix D – Planning Process Documentation ........................................................................................... 1 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 1. Introduction and Planning Process 1.1 Introduction Hazard mitigation is defined as any action taken before, during, or after a disaster to permanently eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property. Hazard mitigation is crucial to a comprehensive emergency management program, working alongside preparedness, response and recovery efforts. This plan will help participating jurisdictions lower their risk to natural hazards and enhance their resilience by identifying local policies and actions to reduce losses. The 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update provides a framework to enhance the general well-being, safety and resilience of residents and communities across Ramsey County. This plan considers the impact of natural hazards across the planning area, reviews current levels of capability relevant to hazard mitigation, and identifies a comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy to buy down levels of risk. 1.2 Plan Goals and Objectives The planning process included a review and update of the prior mitigation goals and objectives as a basis for the planning process and selection of appropriate mitigation actions addressing all hazards of concern. Upon consideration, participating jurisdictions identified the follow goals for the plan update: Goal 1. Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy and the environment from natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 2. Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological and human- caused hazards. Goal 3. Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against impacts of natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 4. Increase education, outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resiliency. 1.3 Plan Organization The Ramsey County HMP update is organized as follows: Section 1. Introduction and Planning Process. Overview of participants, planning process and information regarding adoption of the HMP by Ramsey County and each participating jurisdiction. Description of the HMP methodology and development process; Local Planning Team (LPT) and stakeholder involvement efforts; and a description of how this HMP will be incorporated into existing programs. Section 2. Profile and Capability Assessment. Overview of Ramsey County, including: (1) physical setting, (2) land use, (3) land use trends, (4) population and demographics, (5) general building stock and (6) critical facilities and lifelines. A summary and description of the existing plans, programs and regulatory mechanisms at all levels of government (federal, state, county, local) that support hazard mitigation within the County. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2 Section 3. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA). Documentation of the hazard identification and hazard risk ranking process, hazard profiles, vulnerability assessment (estimates of the impact of hazard events on life, safety, health, general building stock, critical facilities, the economy); consequence assessment (consequences Ramsey County and its communities could reasonably expect from an instance of the hazard including impacts on the public; responders; continuity of operations; property, facilities, and infrastructure; environment; economy of the jurisdiction; and public confidence in the jurisdiction’s governance); description of the status of local data; and planned steps to improve local data to support mitigation planning. Section 4. Mitigation Strategy. Information regarding the mitigation goals and objectives in response to priority hazards of concern and the process by which Ramsey County and local mitigation strategies have been developed or updated. Section 5. Plan Maintenance Procedures. System established to continue to monitor, evaluate, maintain, and update the HMP. 1.4 Planning Process 1.4.1 PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS Table 1 shows all jurisdictions that were participants in the plan update. Table 1. Participating Jurisdictions in the 2025 Update Participating Jurisdictions Arden Hills Falcon Heights Gem Lake Lauderdale Little Canada Maplewood Mounds View New Brighton North Oaks North Saint Paul Roseville Saint Anthony Saint Paul Shoreview Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Township Ramsey County Each participating jurisdiction was asked to do the following: • Actively participate in the planning process. • Provide an update on the status of mitigation actions identified for that community in the 2019 plan. • Provide an update on community capabilities. • Identify at least one new or continuing hazard mitigation action in the updated 2025 hazard mitigation strategy. • Provide input throughout the process on plan elements. • Support public participation in the process. 1.4.2 LOCAL PLANNING TEAM To assist in the development of the plan update and provide guidance and community input on the process, an LPT was convened to serve as community representatives in the process. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 3 Table 2. Local Planning Team Last Name First Name Title Jurisdiction Artig-Swomley Gretchen Mayor Gem Lake Bownik Jim Assistant to the City Administrator Lauderdale Brosnahan David Fire Chief Roseville Butkowski Heather City Administrator Lauderdale Christopherson Pat Town Administrator White Bear Township Diaz Izzy Fire Chief St. Anthony Freed Judd Director of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Ramsey County Hamdorf Trevor Deputy Director of Public Safety New Brighton Hearden Chris Fire Chief Vadnais Heights Lawrence Melissa Acting City Clerk Gem Lake Linder Jim City Council Gem Lake Linehan Jack City Administrator Falcon Heights Lovas Mike EM Planning Coordinator St. Paul Mayer Bryan Emergency Management Coordinator Ramsey County Mallinger Jason Fire Chief North St. Paul Minwegen Jen Office Assistant – Fire Division New Brighton Montain Matt Assistant Fire Chief Mounds View Peltier Paul Public Works Lead White Bear Township Peterson Greg Fire Chief White Bear Lake Richter Mike Assistant Fire Chief Vadnais Heights Sather Matt Assistant Fire Chief – Lake Johanna Fire Arden Hills, North Oaks & Shoreview Schroeder Ryan Assistant Fire Chief Maplewood Sieben Terry Emergency Management Coordinator St. Paul Smiley Don Fire Chief Little Canada Zender Ben Chief of Police Mounds View 1.4.3 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH Public engagement is a key component to the HMP’s success. Public outreach was accomplished both at the beginning and the end of the process. An electronic survey regarding hazard mitigation was released on June 24, 2024, utilizing the web-based Microsoft Forms survey tool. The survey was advertised by the County and jurisdictions within. A full accounting of advertising for the public survey is included in the Planning Process Appendix to this plan. Efforts were made by Ramsey County and participating jurisdictions to focus on including traditionally underserved populations (TUP) into the planning effort. Partnerships between the County, the Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 4 communities, and TUPs were explored. Ramsey County is currently building in-roads with TUPs to ensure that they can be a part of future planning processes. The plan was reviewed by a subject matter expert in TUPs to identify ways in which the plan could be developed in a more inclusive manner, resulting in substantive changes to the plan. After completing the draft plan, it was opened for public review from December 9th, 2024, through December 20th, 2024. The plan was posted for online access, and a comment tool was developed to collect comments. Comments received were reviewed and integrated as appropriate. Stakeholders are the individuals, agencies, and jurisdictions that have a vested interest in the recommendations of the HMP, including all planning partners. The planning process prioritized extensive representation from regional, county and local areas. Stakeholders were given a chance to review the plan during the plan review process. Jurisdictional representatives for each participating jurisdiction were also asked to serve as brokers to stakeholders within their own communities when providing plan inputs. Table 3. Stakeholders Stakeholder Method Anoka County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email Washington County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email Dakota County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email Hennepin County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email 1.4.4 PLANNING MEETINGS Three large-group LPT planning meetings were held to support the planning process. All meetings were held virtually, via Microsoft Teams. Meeting #1 focused on introducing the planning process to the LPT and discussing reporting for community capabilities and progress on 2019 HMP mitigation actions. Meeting #2 focused on the initial results of the HIRA process. Meeting #3 focused on community hazard mitigation strategy development. Additionally, a series of informal mitigation strategy update support meetings were held virtually with communities upon request to discuss potential ideas for hazard mitigation actions. The following jurisdictions held additional community-specific meetings: • North St. Paul September 10, 2024 • Vadnais Heights September 10, 2024 • Falcon Heights September 12, 2024 • Ramsey County September 12, 2024 1.4.5 COMMUNITY CAPABILITIES Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 5 Participating jurisdictions were provided the opportunity to identify community capabilities identified in the previous plan; these capabilities were used as a baseline to identify areas upon which to build for the hazard mitigation strategy. Communities reported on capabilities in the following target areas: • Planning and Regulatory • Administrative and Technical • Financial • Education and Outreach The outcome of the capability assessment surveys is summarized in Section 2. 1.4.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT A risk assessment is a calculation of the threat, vulnerability, and consequence of hazards that impact the participating jurisdictions in the planning area. While hazard mitigation lends itself to natural hazards, Ramsey County included human-caused and technological hazards to develop a more holistic understanding of risk. The following hazards were identified and assessed during the plan update process: • Dam/Levee Failure • Drought • Floods • Geological Hazards (landslide, subsidence, and sinkholes) • Hazardous Materials (Fixed Sites and In Transit) • Summer Weather Hazards • Tornado and Windstorm • Winter Weather Hazards • Human-Caused Hazards • Infrastructure Failure Following an initial evaluation of hazard risk, the LPT discussed the results during the second planning meeting and added comment and context to the final assessment. Further information on the risk assessment process can be found in Section 3. 1.4.7 HAZARD MITIGATION STRATEGY The hazard mitigation strategy was structured in two phases. Initially, communities were provided a list of the hazard mitigation actions from the 2019 HMP. Communities were asked to assess their progress, employing a four-option status indicator to report updates: • Not started • In progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 6 • Completed • Cancelled Communities were also asked to provide background information on each action where applicable, identifying: • If an action was completed, when was it completed? Has the community seen any benefits from the project? • If an action has not been started, why not? • If an action is in progress, how much progress has been made? When is the project slated for completion? • If an action is deleted, why? This evaluation process enabled communities to establish a foundation of ongoing initiatives for the revised hazard mitigation strategy. After completing the HIRA, the LPT focus shifted to developing new hazard mitigation actions to enhance the 2025 strategy. Communities received instructions on creating these new actions, and what supporting information would be necessary for each action included in the plan. Customized planning support meetings were available for communities that requested additional engagement in developing mitigation strategies. These efforts are reflected in Section 4. 1.4.8 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE The LPT developed a plan for HMP implementation and maintenance, including annual review and evaluation, integration with other planning mechanisms and continued public involvement. This information can be found in Section 5. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 7 2. Community Profile and Capabilities 2.1 Introduction Established in 1849, Ramsey County is the second-most populous county in the state and the smallest by land area in Minnesota, covering approximately 170 square miles. Its dense urban core gives it a vibrant economy and diverse population, estimated at 536,075 in 2023. The county encompasses several cities, including Arden Hills, Blaine, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, St. Anthony, Saint Paul, Shoreview, Spring Lake Park, Vadnais Heights, and White Bear Lake. White Bear Township is the only township in Ramsey County. Ramsey County’s economy is diverse, with a mix of public sector, healthcare, education, and service industries forming the backbone. Major employers include state government, major healthcare systems, and higher education institutions. Unemployment rates in the county have remained relatively low in recent years, though like many urban areas, some neighborhoods experience higher rates due to economic disparities. 2.2 Geography and Topography Ramsey County is anchored by its largest city and the state capital, Saint Paul, which forms part of the Twin Cities along with neighboring Minneapolis. The Mississippi River runs along the western boundary of the county, significantly shaping its topography and land use. Despite its urban nature, Ramsey County boasts an extensive park system, with over 6,500 acres of parkland, including lakes, trails, and natural reserves. It is bordered by four counties: Hennepin to the west, Dakota to the south, Washington to the east, and Anoka to the north. Ramsey County, Minnesota, has a relatively flat to gently rolling topography, typical of much of the Upper Midwest. Key features of the county's landscape include: • Low Elevation: The county sits at an average elevation of around 700-1,000 feet above sea level. The terrain is generally flat to gently undulating, with no significant mountain ranges or dramatic elevation changes. • Lakes and Waterways: Ramsey County is home to several lakes, wetlands, and rivers. The Mississippi River forms part of the county's western boundary and is a major geographical feature. Other notable bodies of water include Lake Phalen, Lake Como, and White Bear Lake (partly located in Ramsey County). These water features are integrated into the local landscape, providing natural beauty and recreation. • Glacial Influence: The topography of Ramsey County, like much of Minnesota, was shaped by glacial activity during the last ice age. The landscape includes remnants of glacial drift and moraine, resulting in the formation of lakes, wetlands, and gently rolling hills. • Urban Development: As the county is heavily urbanized, particularly in Saint Paul and surrounding areas, much of the natural topography has been altered by development. Parks, green spaces, and lakes offer glimpses of the region’s natural terrain. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 8 2.2.1 GEOGRAPHY Ramsey County is largely characterized by gently rolling terrain typical of the central lowland region, with areas of flat plains and gradual elevation changes. • Elevation: The elevation in Ramsey County ranges from around 690 feet above sea level near the Mississippi River to approximately 1,100 feet in some of the county’s highest points. • Highest Point: The highest natural point in Ramsey County is located near Indian Mounds Park in Saint Paul, offering scenic views of the Mississippi River Valley. • River Valleys: The Mississippi River Valley provides some of the most dramatic changes in elevation in the county. Bluffs and steep slopes are found along the riverbanks, particularly in the western portion of the county. 2.2.2 HYDROLOGY Despite being an urban county, Ramsey County has numerous water features that play an important role in its geography and landscape, with approximately 10% of the county’s total area being surface water. • Groundwater: Groundwater is the water found beneath the earth's surface, stored in and moving through small spaces within soil, rocks, and geologic formations. In Ramsey County, a section of a large geologic basin, made up of several aquifer units, lies underground and supplies much of the water used for daily needs. Wells are used to extract groundwater from these aquifers, which is then utilized for drinking, heating and cooling, irrigation, manufacturing, and other purposes. Groundwater quality is influenced by its natural properties and any contaminants introduced into the aquifers, either naturally or through human activity. Approximately 15-20% of Ramsey County residents rely exclusively on groundwater for their drinking water. • Rivers: o The Mississippi River forms part of the western boundary and is the most significant water feature. Historically, it has been a key transportation route and continues to play a major role in commerce and recreation. o The Minnesota River joins the Mississippi just south of Ramsey County. • Lakes: There are over 80 lakes in Ramsey County. Prominent lakes include: o Lake Phalen: One of the largest lakes in the county and a popular recreational destination. o Como Lake: Located in Saint Paul’s Como Park, this is an urban lake with surrounding parkland. o White Bear Lake: Part of this large lake lies within Ramsey County, although most of it is in neighboring Washington County. It is a recreational hub and supports suburban communities. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 9 • Wetlands: The county has numerous wetlands that contribute to its diverse ecology, including areas near Battle Creek Regional Park and Rice Creek. Wetland areas are critical for stormwater management, wildlife habitats, and maintaining biodiversity in this urban landscape. • Watershed Districts: There are five watershed districts and three water management organizations within the county. The five districts are Capitol Region Watershed District, Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Valley Branch Watershed District. The water management organizations are Lower Mississippi River Water Management Organization, Mississippi Water Management Organization, and Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization. 2.2.3 GEOLOGY Ramsey County has a diverse geological history shaped by both glacial and ancient marine processes. The landscape was heavily influenced by the Wisconsin Glaciation, which left behind glacial deposits, moraines, and outwash plains, forming the county's rolling terrain and contributing to the development of the Mississippi River. Beneath the glacial sediments, the bedrock consists primarily of sedimentary rocks like limestone, dolostone, and sandstone, deposited when the area was covered by shallow seas around 500 million years ago. The Mississippi River has carved valleys into these rock layers, exposing bluffs, while fertile soils from glacial deposits historically supported agriculture. Additionally, karst features are present in some areas due to the soluble limestone bedrock, although these are less common than in southeastern Minnesota. 2.3 Population and Demographics Demographic Overview Ramsey County is home to a diverse population that reflects a rich tapestry of racial, ethnic, and cultural groups. Understanding the demographic makeup of the county is critical to ensuring that hazard mitigation efforts are equitable and address the needs of all community members. Population Composition As of the most recent U.S. Census, Ramsey County has a population of 552,352 residents. Figure 1 shows Ramsey population density by U.S. Census block. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 10 Figure 1. Ramsey County Population by Census Block The racial and ethnic composition of the county is as follows: • White: 59.6% • Black or African American: 12.9% • Hispanic or Latino: 8.2% • Asian: 15.6% Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 11 • Native American or Alaska Native: 0.8% • Other: 2.9% Minnesota is a designated refugee settlement area, and the county's diverse population includes significant immigrant communities. In 2018, the largest groups of foreign-born Minnesotans were born in Mexico (about 64,500); Somalia (33,500); India (30,200); Laos, including Hmong (24,400); Vietnam (18,600); China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan (18,600); Ethiopia (21,900); and Thailand, including Hmong (18,500). These estimates do not include U.S.-born children of these immigrants. They also likely underestimate the size of our immigrant populations because trust and language issues reduce response rates to Census surveys. Fifty-one percent of Minnesota's foreign-born population are naturalized U.S. citizens. Age Distribution The age distribution in Ramsey County reflects both a growing youth population and an aging community, with a median age of 36.4, slightly younger than the state median age of 39.1: • 17 years and younger: 23.1% • 18-24 years: 9.6% • 25-34 years: 16.2% • 35-44 years: 13.1% • 45-54 years: 10.9% • 55-64 years: 11.9% • 65 years and older: 15.1% Understanding the composition, geographical distribution, and capability considerations of these diverse populations is essential, as these groups traditionally have heightened vulnerabilities before, during and after hazard events, particularly young children, the elderly, people with disabilities and serious health conditions, people who are socially isolated, and households with limited English proficiencies. 2.4 Social Vulnerability The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) is a critical tool used to assess the resilience of communities in the face of hazards. The SVI measures various factors that influence a community’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. In Ramsey County, these factors are essential for identifying populations that may be disproportionately affected by natural and human-made hazards. According to the latest SVI data, Ramsey County has an overall SVI score of 0.9419 (from a range of 0 to 1), indicating that the county’s vulnerability level is high compared to other counties across the country. Higher SVI scores reflect greater social vulnerability, which can increase the risks associated with hazard events. Disparities that persist in society, including social, economic, and health inequities, and which have impacted the historically disadvantages and underserved populations throughout the County, can be exacerbated by the impacts of extreme weather events. Periods of extreme heat, winter storms or Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 12 floods can cause increases in utilities and other expenses that are not easily absorbed by low-income families. Additionally, low-income communities and communities of color are the most vulnerable to a rapidly changing climate. 2.4.1 SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS Socioeconomic status affects hazard vulnerability because lower-income populations often have limited access to resources, such as safe housing, insurance, and emergency services, making them less resilient to disasters. Additionally, they may face greater challenges in recovery, prolonging the impacts of hazards. • The percentage of residents living below the poverty line in Ramsey County is 12.9 %. • Unemployment rates stand at 4.6%, with certain areas of the county experiencing even higher levels of joblessness. • Household income in more vulnerable areas of the county is significantly lower than the countywide average, with 20.5% of countywide households reporting incomes of $35,000 or less. • Housing cost-burdened occupied units (30%+ of income spent on housing costs) equal approximately 26.4% of the available housing stock. • Data shows that educational attainment also plays a role, with 8.8% of residents over age 25 lacking a high school diploma. • In the metro area, 4 of every 5 Areas of Concentrated Poverty are also census tracts where at least half of residents are people of color. Areas with lower income, more poverty and unemployment, and fewer adults with high school diplomas have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are found along and north of I- 94, Saint Paul’s East and West Sides, and in areas in Roseville and Mounds View. 2.4.2 HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION AND DISABILITY The U.S. Census defines four major categories of disabilities: • Sensory disabilities include blindness, deafness, or severe vision or hearing impairment. • Physical disabilities are long-lasting conditions that substantially limit one or more basic physical activities, such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or carrying things. • Self-care disabilities are conditions lasting six or more months that make it a challenge to dress, bathe, or move around inside the home. • Go-outside-the-home disabilities are conditions lasting six or more months that make it difficult for people to shop or to visit a doctor’s office by themselves. Household composition and disability affect hazard vulnerability as families with young children, elderly members, or individuals with disabilities may face greater difficulties in evacuating, accessing emergency information, and receiving appropriate care during disasters. These groups often require additional support and tailored resources to ensure safety and resilience. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 13 • Vulnerability is also shaped by the composition of households in the county. Individuals under the age of 18 make up 23.1% of the population, while individuals over the age of 65 represent 15.1%. • Additionally, 12.0% of individuals in Ramsey County report having a disability, which can affect the ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters. • Single-parent households account for 5.7% of all households in Ramsey County, a group that may face heightened vulnerability due to resource constraints. Areas with more elderly, youth, people with disabilities and single parent households with young children have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are found along & north of I-94, Saint Paul’s East and West Sides, and in areas in Mounds View, New Brighton, Maplewood, White Bear Lake, Roseville and Little Canada. 2.4.3 MINORITY STATUS AND LANGUAGE Minority status and language barriers increase hazard vulnerability as marginalized communities may face systemic discrimination, limited access to resources, and reduced trust in authorities. Language barriers can hinder the ability to receive critical emergency information and access services. Limited English proficiency can put individuals at higher risk because they might not be aware of or fully understand evacuation orders and other warnings, instructions on how to access critical City services, or other communication from first responders. This barrier exacerbates efforts for preparedness, increases their risks during disasters, and prolongs the recovery process. • Ramsey County is home to a diverse population, with 40.4% of residents identifying as a racial or ethnic minority. These groups often face barriers to accessing resources and services during emergencies. • Language proficiency is a significant factor in vulnerability. Ramsey County has a significant portion of the population with limited English proficiency. 23.5% of residents speak a language other than English at home, with the most common languages being Asian and Pacific Island languages (10.6%) and Spanish (5.3%). This may indicate potential communication challenges in the event of an emergency. Areas with more minorities and people age 5+ who speak English "less than well" have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are shown in areas along and north of I-94, Saint Paul’s East and West sides, and in areas in Mounds View, Saint Anthony, Maplewood, Lauderdale, Falcon Heights, and Little Canada. 2.4.4 HOUSING AND TRANSPORTATION Housing and transportation affect hazard vulnerability because individuals in substandard housing or densely populated areas are more likely to experience severe damage during disasters. Access to affordable housing can be a challenge and disasters that result in property damage can further constrain the housing market. For some low income or diverse populations, they may have only been able to purchase homes in areas with increased hazard risk exposure as they have limited income or have experienced issues with housing access due to historic discriminatory practices. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 14 Limited access to reliable transportation can hinder evacuation efforts and reduce the ability to access emergency services or resources. The evacuation of people with disabilities and access and functional needs poses additional requirements. Many people who are otherwise self-sufficient may have special circumstances due to short-term issues such as physical or mental health issues, or have temporary resource shortages (e.g., fuel, transportation). • Housing instability is a concern in Ramsey County, with 41.0% of residents living in renter- occupied units. Renters may have fewer resources to recover from hazard events and are often more vulnerable to displacement. • In terms of transportation, 9.7% of households do not have access to a vehicle, making evacuation and accessing services more difficult in an emergency. • The percentage of residents living in housing units with more than one occupant per room (overcrowded conditions) is 4.0%, which may increase the spread of illness and reduce resilience. • The percentage of residents living in housing built in 1939 or earlier is 27.5%, increasing the likelihood of damage during hazard events. Areas with more multi-unit housing, mobile homes, crowded homes, homes with no vehicle access, and institutionalized group quarters have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are found along and north of I-94, Saint Paul’s East and West sides, and in areas in Mounds View, New Brighton, Saint Anthony, Maplewood, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale, Falcon Heights, Blaine, White Bear Lake, Roseville, Vadnais Heights and Little Canada. 2.4.5 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF VULNERABILITY Centers for Disease Control (CDC)/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) SVI data shows that social vulnerability is not evenly distributed across Ramsey County. Certain areas have notably higher SVI scores. These areas are more likely to experience compounded challenges during disasters due to the concentration of vulnerable populations and limited resources. An interactive, visual, spatial distribution by census tract of Ramsey County’s SVI by each of the four key themes can be viewed at https://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=2bd18bc999dd452db6c680eba697f916. 2.4.6 HEALTH DISPARITIES Health disparities play a significant role in shaping a community's vulnerability to hazards, as underlying health conditions and unequal access to healthcare can hinder the ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. In Ramsey County, understanding these disparities is critical to ensuring that mitigation strategies address the unique needs of all residents. 2.4.6.1 Chronic Health Conditions Chronic health issues such as asthma, diabetes, heart disease, and respiratory conditions can exacerbate the impacts of disasters, especially for populations with limited access to healthcare. Pre-existing and underlying health conditions can elevate a heat event to a life-threatening situation. Those with less disposable income are affected disproportionately due to the inability to provide safe shelter, air Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 15 conditioning, medical care, and quality foods, and are also least able to obtain information related to extreme event risks and adaptation strategies. In Ramsey County: • The hospitalization rate for asthma among residents is 7.7 per 10,000, but among youth ages 5 to 19, the asthma hospitalization rate is much higher at 15.4 per 10,000. Asthma hospitalization rates for children living in the Twin Cities metropolitan area are 67% higher than for children living in Greater Minnesota. • In 2016, the rate of death from diabetes in the county was 20.8 per 100,000. In a 2014 metro survey, 13.9 percent of those from lower income households were diagnosed with diabetes, compared to 5.4 percent of those from higher income households. That’s an 8.5 percentage point gap between the two income groups. The same survey found that 15.8 percent of those with only a high school education reported being told they had diabetes compared to 4.3 percent of those with bachelor’s degrees. That’s an 11.5 percentage point gap between the groups. • For 2012-2016, the five-year age adjusted rates for stroke deaths in Minnesota was 32.7 per 100,000 compared to a Ramsey rate of 39.6 per 100,000. During that same period, the five-year age adjusted rates for heart disease deaths in Minnesota was 116.6 per 100,000 compared to a Ramsey rate of 110. According to a 2014 survey in the Metro area, those with less education or lower income have a much higher risk of coronary heart disease, strokes and heart attacks. Among those with high school education, 12.1% report being diagnosed with heart disease compared to 3.1% of those with a bachelor’s degree. These chronic health conditions can increase the severity of harm experienced during events such as poor air quality from wildfires, extreme heat, or power outages. 2.4.6.2 Healthcare Access and Insurance Coverage Access to healthcare is a critical factor in resilience, as individuals without adequate healthcare are less likely to receive the care they need during and after disasters. In Ramsey County: • 5.1% of the population is uninsured. • In Ramsey County in 2014, among adults 25 years or older that take prescription medications, about 10 percent could not afford their prescriptions. 2.5 Economy Overall, the county has a stable and diverse economy with public administration, education, healthcare, and manufacturing as foundational pillars. According to the 2023 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimate, the median household income in Ramsey County is $77,812, and the employment rate 67%, with 63.6% working for private sector businesses. In comparison, the median household income for Minnesota is $85,086. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 16 2.6 Community Services and Infrastructure The following section offers an overview of community services and infrastructure in Ramsey County. Community services include essential functions such as healthcare, public safety, and emergency services. In terms of infrastructure, examples include the county's power utilities, water and sewer systems, and its transportation network, which supports both public and private transit options. 2.6.1 HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Ramsey County has a robust healthcare system with a variety of providers, including major hospitals like Regions Hospital, United Hospital, and M Health Fairview St. John’s Hospital. These facilities offer services ranging from emergency care and surgery to mental health and specialized treatments. In addition to large healthcare networks like HealthPartners and Allina Health, there are numerous clinics providing primary and specialty care. The county also has an extensive network of long-term care facilities, skilled nursing centers, and hospice services, supporting the elderly and those with chronic health conditions or end-of-life care needs. 2.6.2 PUBLIC SAFETY Ramsey County is served by a comprehensive network of public safety agencies, including police, fire, and emergency medical services (EMS), to ensure the safety and well-being of its residents. • Police Services: The primary law enforcement agency in the county is the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, which provides patrol, investigative services, and emergency response for unincorporated areas and supports municipal police departments. Cities like Saint Paul and Maplewood have their own police departments, with the Saint Paul Police Department being the largest in the county, offering full-service law enforcement, including specialized units like homicide, narcotics, and Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT). • Fire Services: Ramsey County’s fire protection is provided by municipal fire departments, including the Saint Paul Fire Department, one of the largest and most comprehensive in the region. These departments handle fire suppression, fire prevention, rescue operations, and hazardous materials response. Many fire departments are integrated with EMS to provide rapid emergency medical assistance. • Emergency Medical Services: EMS in Ramsey County are primarily provided by agencies like Allina Health EMS, Saint Paul Fire Department EMS, and other local first responders. These services provide advanced life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS) care in emergencies, handling medical crises, accidents, and disasters. 2.6.3 UTILITIES Ramsey County provides its residents with a comprehensive array of utility services, including water, sewer, natural gas, and electricity, managed by various public and private entities. 2.6.3.1 Water and Sewer Services Water services in Ramsey County are primarily managed by local municipalities. The City of Saint Paul operates its own water utility, providing safe drinking water sourced from the Mississippi River and treated at the Saint Paul Regional Water Services facility. The water system is regularly monitored to Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 17 ensure compliance with federal and state safety standards. Similarly, wastewater treatment is handled by the Metropolitan Council, which manages a regional sewer system that collects and treats sewage from multiple municipalities in the area, including Saint Paul and surrounding suburbs. 2.6.3.2 Natural Gas Natural gas services in Ramsey County are primarily provided by Xcel Energy, which supplies natural gas to homes and businesses throughout the region. Xcel Energy is responsible for the maintenance and operation of gas pipelines, ensuring reliable delivery and adherence to safety regulations. The company also offers programs aimed at energy efficiency and conservation. 2.6.3.3 Electricity Xcel Energy also provides a significant portion of the county with electricity. The company offers various programs, including renewable energy options, rebates for energy-efficient appliances, and initiatives to help customers reduce their energy usage. Other utility providers in the area include Dakota Electric Association and the City of Saint Paul, which offers electricity services to some residents. 2.6.3.4 Transportation Comprehensive transportation infrastructure that encompasses an extensive network of roads, highways, and public transit systems, which are crucial for the mobility of residents and the efficiency of local commerce. The county manages approximately 250 miles of roads. Major highways such as I-94, I- 35W, and Highway 36 serve as key corridors for both local and regional traffic. Public transit services in Ramsey County are provided by Metro Transit, which operates various bus routes and light rail lines, including the upcoming Riverview Corridor streetcar line aimed at enhancing connectivity between major areas like Downtown Saint Paul and the Mall of America. Additionally, several Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) projects, such as the Rush Line and Gold Line, are planned to improve access to surrounding communities. Planned activities include expanding the capacity of major highways to accommodate growing traffic, implementing the "All Abilities Transportation Network" to promote inclusivity in transportation, and coordinating bike and pedestrian trails across the county. These initiatives align with the County's strategic goal of developing a sustainable, efficient, and multimodal transportation system that meets the needs of all residents. 2.7 Critical Facilities Critical facilities are interspersed throughout Ramsey County. Figure 2 shows all fire stations, post offices, schools, hospitals and airports in the county. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 18 Figure 2. Critical Facilities in Ramsey County 2.8 Land Use and Ownership Ramsey County features a mix of urban, suburban, and natural land use. The county is heavily urbanized, particularly in Saint Paul, which occupies much of the county's land. Residential, commercial, and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 19 industrial zones dominate, with neighborhoods of single-family homes and high-density apartments, along with business districts and manufacturing centers. In terms of ownership, a significant portion of the land is privately owned, especially residential and commercial properties. Public lands, managed by county and city authorities, include parks, government buildings, and protected areas. The county has been actively balancing development with conservation efforts, particularly in managing urban sprawl and preserving green spaces. There are approximately 229,000 housing units, with close to 60% as owner-occupied. Almost 90% of the housing units were built prior to 2000. 2.9 Climate Change and Trends Climate trends in Ramsey County, Minnesota, are reflective of broader regional patterns in the Upper Midwest, which has been experiencing noticeable shifts due to climate change. Key trends, as reported by the University of Minnesota’s Climate Adaptation Partnership and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources include: • Rising Temperatures: Over the past few decades, Ramsey County has experienced a steady increase in average annual temperatures. Warmer winters, with fewer extreme cold days, are a prominent feature, though summers are also seeing more frequent heat waves. Ramsey County has already observed an average annual temperature increase of 3.5 degrees F, with much of this warming occurring during the coldest months of the year. • Increased Precipitation: There has been a rise in annual precipitation, with heavier rainfall events becoming more common. This trend is contributing to localized flooding and increased stormwater management challenges in urban areas like Saint Paul. The region has experienced an increase in annual precipitation of 4.1 inches, while statewide an increase of 3.3 inches annually has been observed. By the end of the century, winter and spring precipitation are expected to increase by 30%, as projected by the University of Minnesota’s Climate Adaptation Partnership. • Seasonal Shifts: Winters are becoming shorter and less severe, while springs and autumns are extending. Snowfall patterns are shifting, with less frequent but more intense snowstorms, followed by quicker melts. It has been observed that winters in Minnesota are warming dramatically, and spring weather is arriving up to two weeks earlier than in the early 1900s. Climate change is expected to continue altering the timing of the seasons in the future. Winters are predicted to become shorter, warmer, and wetter, with an increase in both spring and heavy precipitation. Summers are likely to grow longer and hotter, beginning earlier and extending later into the year. The last freeze of spring is projected to occur increasingly earlier, while the first freeze of fall will likely be delayed, further lengthening the growing season. • More Extreme Weather Events: The region, including Ramsey County, has seen more intense storms, such as thunderstorms, tornadoes, and flash flooding events. This is consistent with a broader trend toward more frequent and severe extreme weather across the Midwest. For example, the term “mega-rain” is used to describe when at least six inches of rain fall over an area of at least 1,000 square miles. Since 1973, Minnesota has experienced 16 mega-rains, 11 of Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 20 those events have occurred since 2000, indicating a trend toward an increase in frequency and intensity of heavy rainfall events. 2.10 Community Capabilities Assessment Participating jurisdictions completed assessments of community capabilities, focusing on the following capability areas: • Planning and Regulatory • Administrative and Technical • Financial • Education and Outreach Assessment results were utilized by communities to identify both capability gaps and existing capabilities that could be used to mitigate hazards. It is important to remember that the capabilities assessment was not a test, and most communities had very valid reasons for having or not having specific capabilities. The following sections indicate specific capabilities in each community, as identified by that community. 2.10.1 PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITIES Planning and regulatory capabilities include codes, ordinances, policies, laws, plans and programs that guide growth and development. These capabilities can either support risk reduction or create areas that are more vulnerable to disaster. Table 4. Planning Capabilities in Ramsey County Plans Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n Cl i m a t e C h a n g e A d a p t a t i o n P l a n Co m m u n i t y W i l d f i r e P r o t e c t i o n P l a n Co m p r e h e n s i v e / M a s t e r P l a n Co n t i n u i t y o f O p e r a t i o n s P l a n Ec o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t P l a n La n d U s e P l a n Lo c a l E m e r g e n c y O p e r a t i o n s P l a n St o r m w a t e r M a n a g e m e n t P l a n Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n Arden Hills • • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • Gem Lake • • • • Lauderdale • • • • Little Canada • • • • • • • • Maplewood • • • • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • North Oaks • • • • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 21 Plans Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n Cl i m a t e C h a n g e A d a p t a t i o n P l a n Co m m u n i t y W i l d f i r e P r o t e c t i o n P l a n Co m p r e h e n s i v e / M a s t e r P l a n Co n t i n u i t y o f O p e r a t i o n s P l a n Ec o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t P l a n La n d U s e P l a n Lo c a l E m e r g e n c y O p e r a t i o n s P l a n St o r m w a t e r M a n a g e m e n t P l a n Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n North Saint Paul • • • • • Roseville • • • • • Saint Anthony • • • Saint Paul • • • • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • • • • • • White Bear Lake • • • • • White Bear Township • • • • • • • • Ramsey County • • • • • • • • Table 5. Regulatory Capabilities in Ramsey County Land Use and Planning Ordinances La n d A c q u i s i t i o n Bu i l d i n g C o d e Fl o o d I n s u r a n c e R a t e Ma p s ( F I R M S ) Fl o o d p l a i n O r d i n a n c e Su b s t a n t i a l D a m a g e Pl a n Na t u r a l H a z a r d -S p e c i f i c Or d i n a n c e s Su b d i v i s i o n O r d i n a n c e s Zo n i n g O r d i n a n c e Arden Hills • • • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • • Gem Lake • • • • Lauderdale • • • • • • Little Canada • • • • • • • • Maplewood • • • • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • North Oaks • • • • • North Saint Paul • • • • Roseville • • • Saint Anthony • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 22 Land Use and Planning Ordinances La n d A c q u i s i t i o n Bu i l d i n g C o d e Fl o o d I n s u r a n c e R a t e Ma p s ( F I R M S ) Fl o o d p l a i n O r d i n a n c e Su b s t a n t i a l D a m a g e Pl a n Na t u r a l H a z a r d -S p e c i f i c Or d i n a n c e s Su b d i v i s i o n O r d i n a n c e s Zo n i n g O r d i n a n c e Saint Paul • • • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • • White Bear Lake • • • • • White Bear Township • • • • • • Ramsey County • • 2.10.2 ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES Administrative and technical capabilities include staff, skills and tools. These capabilities can be used for mitigation planning and to carry out specific mitigation actions. They also include the ability to access, coordinate and implement these resources effectively. Table 6. Administrative and Technical Capabilities in Ramsey County Administrative and Technical Capabilities Ch i e f B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l Ci v i l E n g i n e e r Co m m u n i t y P l a n n e r Em e r g e n c y M a n a g e r Fl o o d p l a i n A d m i n i s t r a t o r GI S C o o r d i n a t o r Pl a n n i n g B o a r d Zo n i n g O f f i c i a l Gr a n t W r i t i n g C a p a b i l i t y Ha z a r d D a t a a n d I n f o r m a t i o n GI S A n a l y s i s Mu t u a l A i d A g r e e m e n t s Arden Hills • • • • • • • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • • • • • Gem Lake • • • • • • • Lauderdale • • • • • • • • • Little Canada • • • • • • • Maplewood • • • • • • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • • • • North Oaks • • • • • • • • • • • • North Saint Paul • • • • • • • • • • • Roseville • • • • • • • • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 23 Administrative and Technical Capabilities Ch i e f B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l Ci v i l E n g i n e e r Co m m u n i t y P l a n n e r Em e r g e n c y M a n a g e r Fl o o d p l a i n A d m i n i s t r a t o r GI S C o o r d i n a t o r Pl a n n i n g B o a r d Zo n i n g O f f i c i a l Gr a n t W r i t i n g C a p a b i l i t y Ha z a r d D a t a a n d I n f o r m a t i o n GI S A n a l y s i s Mu t u a l A i d A g r e e m e n t s Saint Anthony • • • • • • • Saint Paul • • • • • • • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • • • • • • • • White Bear Lake • • • • • • • White Bear Township • • • • • • • • • • Ramsey County • • • • • • • • • 2.10.3 FINANCIAL CAPABILITIES Financial capabilities include resources to fund mitigation actions. Table 7. Financial Capabilities in Ramsey County Financial Capabilities Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t Pr o j e c t F u n d i n g Co m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t Bl o c k G r a n t Fe d e r a l F u n d i n g P r o g r a m s (N o n -FE M A ) Wa t e r , G a s , S e w e r o r El e c t r i c F e e s Im p a c t F e e s f o r N e w De v e l o p m e n t St a t e F u n d i n g P r o g r a m s St o r m w a t e r U t i l i t y F e e s Arden Hills • • • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • • • Gem Lake • • • Lauderdale • • • • • Little Canada • • • • • • Maplewood • • • • Mounds View • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • North Oaks • • • • • North Saint Paul • • • • • • Roseville • • • • • • Saint Anthony • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 24 Financial Capabilities Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t Pr o j e c t F u n d i n g Co m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t Bl o c k G r a n t Fe d e r a l F u n d i n g P r o g r a m s (N o n -FE M A ) Wa t e r , G a s , S e w e r o r El e c t r i c F e e s Im p a c t F e e s f o r N e w De v e l o p m e n t St a t e F u n d i n g P r o g r a m s St o r m w a t e r U t i l i t y F e e s Saint Paul • • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • • • White Bear Lake • White Bear Township • • • • • Ramsey County 2.10.4 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH CAPABILITIES Education and outreach capabilities include programs and methods that Ramsey County and its communities can use to communicate about and encourage risk reduction. Table 8. Education and Outreach Capabilities in Ramsey County Education and Outreach Capability Co m m u n i t y N e w s l e t t e r s Ha z a r d A w a r e n e s s P r o g r a m s Lo c a l N e w s Or g a n i z a t i o n s t h a t R e p r e s e n t , Ad v o c a t e f o r o r I n t e r a c t w i t h Un d e r s e r v e d a n d V u l n e r a b l e Co m m u n i t i e s Lo c a l G r a s s r o o t s I n i t i a t i v e s Ta r g e t e d t o D i v e r s e Po p u l a t i o n s a t R i s k So c i a l M e d i a Arden Hills • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • Gem Lake • • • • Lauderdale • • • Little Canada • • • • Maplewood • • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • North Oaks • • • • • North Saint Paul • • • • • • Roseville • • • • • • Saint Anthony • • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 25 Education and Outreach Capability Co m m u n i t y N e w s l e t t e r s Ha z a r d A w a r e n e s s P r o g r a m s Lo c a l N e w s Or g a n i z a t i o n s t h a t R e p r e s e n t , Ad v o c a t e f o r o r I n t e r a c t w i t h Un d e r s e r v e d a n d V u l n e r a b l e Co m m u n i t i e s Lo c a l G r a s s r o o t s I n i t i a t i v e s Ta r g e t e d t o D i v e r s e Po p u l a t i o n s a t R i s k So c i a l M e d i a Saint Paul • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • White Bear Lake • • • • White Bear Township Ramsey County • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 26 3. Risk Assessment 3.1 Risk Assessment A risk assessment is the process of measuring the potential loss of life, personal injury, and economic and property damage resulting from identified hazards. It allows planning personnel to address and reduce hazard impacts and emergency management personnel to establish early response priorities by identifying potential hazards and vulnerable assets. Results of the risk assessment are used to inform mitigation planning processes, including determining and prioritizing mitigation actions that reduce a community’s risk to a specified hazard. Past, present, and future conditions must be evaluated to assess risk most accurately for each jurisdiction. The Ramsey County risk assessment includes the following: • Identification of hazards of concern that impact Ramsey County • Methodology and tools used to conduct the risk assessment • Hazard ranking • Hazards of concern profiles and vulnerability assessment 3.2 Hazard Summary 3.2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS Ramsey County considered a full range of natural hazards that could impact the planning area. Hazard identification began with a review of the hazards assessed in the 2019 Ramsey County plan, the City of Saint Paul Hazard Mitigation Plan, and the State of Minnesota Hazard Mitigation Plan. A total of eight natural hazards and three human-caused hazards of concern were identified as significant hazards affecting the entire planning area, to be addressed in this plan: • Dam/Levee Failure • Drought • Floods • Geologic Hazards • Hazardous Materials • Summer Weather Hazards • Tornado and Windstorm • Winter Weather Hazards • Human-Caused Hazards • Infrastructure Failure 3.2.2 RAMSEY COUNTY DISASTER DECLARATIONS Table 9 lists FEMA declarations in Ramsey County. Table 9. Disaster Declarations in Ramsey County Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 27 Ramsey County Disaster Declarations Declaration Type Date Year Declared Incident Type Declaration Title Designated Area DR-80-MN DR 1957-06-22 1957 Flood Floods Statewide DR-188-MN DR 1965-04-11 1965 Flood Flooding Ramsey (County) DR-255-MN DR 1969-04-18 1969 Flood Flooding Ramsey (County) EM-3013-MN EM 1976-06-17 1976 Drought Drought Ramsey (County) FM-2018-MN FM 1976-09-08 1976 Fire Huntersville Statewide FM-2023-MN FM 1976-09-11 1976 Fire Galvin Line Statewide FM-2022-MN FM 1976-09-11 1976 Fire Little Swan Statewide FM-2021-MN FM 1976-09-11 1976 Fire Tate Statewide FM-2020-MN FM 1976-09-11 1976 Fire Tamarack Statewide FM-2019-MN FM 1976-09-11 1976 Fire Tower Statewide FM-2024-MN FM 1976-10-01 1977 Fire McGregor Fire Statewide DR-560-MN DR 1978-07-08 1978 Severe Storm Severe Storms, Flooding, Hail & Tornadoes Ramsey DR-797-MN DR 1987-08-06 1987 Severe Storm Severe Storms, Tornadoes & Flooding Ramsey DR-993-MN DR 1993-06-11 1993 Severe Storm Severe Storms, Tornadoes & Flooding Ramsey DR-1175-MN DR 1997-04-08 1997 Flood Severe Flooding, High Winds, Severe Storms Ramsey DR-1187-MN DR 1997-08-25 1997 Severe Storm Severe Storms, Tornadoes, High Winds, Flooding Ramsey DR-1225-MN DR 1998-06-23 1998 Tornado Severe Storms, Straight Line Winds, & Tornadoes Ramsey DR-1333-MN DR 2000-06-27 2000 Severe Storm Severe Storms and Flooding Ramsey DR-1370-MN DR 2001-05-16 2001 Flood Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, & Tornadoes Ramsey EM-3242-MN EM 2005-09-13 2005 Hurricane Hurricane Katrina Evacuation Ramsey EM-3310-MN EM 2010-03-19 2010 Flood Flooding Ramsey DR-1900-MN DR 2010-04-19 2010 Flood Flooding Ramsey DR-1982-MN DR 2011-05-10 2011 Flood Severe Storms and Flooding Ramsey DR-4182-MN DR 2014-07-21 2014 Flood Severe Storms, Straight- Line Winds, Flooding, Landslides, & Mudslides Ramsey Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 28 Ramsey County Disaster Declarations DR-4442-MN DR 2019-06-12 2019 Flood Severe Winter Storm, Straight-Line Winds, & Flooding Ramsey EM-3453-MN EM 2020-03-13 2020 Biological Covid-19 Ramsey DR-4531-MN DR 2020-04-07 2020 Biological Covid-19 Pandemic Ramsey Source: FEMA 3.3 Assessment Methodology The LPT utilized a risk-based formula for assessing hazards in Ramsey County, where Risk = Threat x Vulnerability x Consequence. Specific sections of the hazard assessment are tied to each of these variables, giving a well-rounded and thorough examination of each hazard and its relation to Ramsey County and its communities. 3.3.1 THREAT Hazards were first assessed for the threat they pose to the county and communities. Elements of threat were assessed in the following sections in each hazard chapter: • Hazard Profile • Location • Extent • History • Probability • Climate Change Impacts 3.3.2 VULNERABILITY Ramsey County and its communities were also assessed for vulnerabilities to each disaster. The following vulnerabilities were assessed in each hazard chapter: • Vulnerability of People • Vulnerability of Property • Vulnerability of the Environment • Vulnerability of County and Community Operations 3.3.3 CONSEQUENCE Finally, hazards were assessed for the consequences Ramsey County and its communities could reasonably expect from an instance of the hazard. While a full scenario wasn’t used for each hazard, general impacts were reasonable extrapolated for each hazard. • Impact on the Public • Impact on Responders Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 29 • Impact on Continuity of Operations • Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Impact on the Environment • Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance 3.4 Hazard Rankings Each hazard was given a ranking based on three key elements of risk – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Table 10. Hazard Rankings Hazard Threat Vulnerability Consequence Score Hazard Rank Dam/Levee Failure Rare – 1 Localized - 2 Limited – 2 5 Medium Drought Occasional – 2 Extensive – 4 Limited – 2 8 Medium Floods Frequent – 3 Localized – 2 Critical – 3 8 Medium Geologic Hazards Occasional – 2 Limited – 1 Negligible – 1 4 Low Hazardous Materials Occasional – 2 Limited – 1 Limited - 2 5 Medium Summer Weather Hazards Likely – 4 Widespread – 3 Limited – 2 9 High Tornado and Windstorm Frequent – 3 Widespread – 3 Catastrophic – 4 10 High Winter Weather Hazards Likely – 4 Widespread – 3 Limited – 2 9 High Human-Caused Hazards Rare – 1 Limited – 1 Catastrophic – 4 6 Medium Infrastructure Failure Rare – 1 Limited – 1 Catastrophic - 4 6 Medium Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 30 3.5 Community Hazard Rankings Table 11. Hazard Rankings shows hazard rankings by community. Table 11. Hazard Rankings Jurisdiction Da m / Le v e e Fa i l u r e Dr o u g h t Fl o o d s Ge o l o g i c H a z a r d s Ha z a r d o u s Ma t e r i a l s Su m m e r We a t h e r H a z a r d s To r n a d o a n d Wi n d s to r m Wi nt e r We a t h e r Ha z a r d s Hu m a n -Ca u s e d Ha z a r d s In f r a s t r u ctu r e Fa i l u r e Arden Hills Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Falcon Heights Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Gem Lake Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Lauderdale Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Little Canada Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Maplewood Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Mounds View Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium New Brighton Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium North Oaks Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium North Saint Paul Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Roseville Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Saint Anthony Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Saint Paul Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Shoreview Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Vadnais Heights Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium White Bear Lake Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium White Bear Township Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Ramsey County Medium Medium Medium Low Medium High High High Medium Medium Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 31 3.6 Dam/Levee Failure 3.6.1 PROFILE Dams are structures built across a river, stream, or other body of water designed to control and manage water flow. Dams create reservoirs, which can supply water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial use, manage water resources, and provide recreational opportunities. Levees are an embankment or natural ridge constructed along the edges of a river or other body of water to prevent flooding of the adjacent land. Levees serve to protect populated areas, agricultural lands, and infrastructure from floodwaters. Failures of dams and levees can result in sudden and severe flooding. The causes of such failures include natural hazards (earthquakes, flooding severe weather conditions), human-made threats (terrorism, human error) or other key factors such as structural deficiencies or improper maintenance, leading to compromise the integrity of the dam/levee. When a dam/levee fails, the rapid release of water can inundate downstream areas, leading to loss of life, extensive property damage, and environmental destruction. Populated areas, agricultural lands, and infrastructure located downstream are particularly vulnerable to impacts. The cascading effects can also include disruption of utilities, transportation networks, and other critical infrastructure. There are seven dams and no levees located in Ramsey County. 3.6.2 LOCATION Table 10 shows dams that are located within the Ramsey County geographical boundaries. There are also three additional dams outside the county’s borders that have been identified as potential risks to the county: Coon Rapids Dam in Anoka County and St. Anthony Falls Upper and Lower Lock and Dams in Hennepin County. Table 12. Dams Located in Ramsey County Name Owner River Primary Purpose Year Built NID Height Dam Type Classification Arlington Detention City of Saint Paul Phalen Creek tributary Flood Risk Reduction 1989 15' Earth Significant Battle Creek WD of Ramsey- Washington Metro Battle Creek Flood Risk Reduction 1982 30' Earth High Battle Creek Middle WD of Ramsey- Washington Metro Battle Creek Flood Risk Reduction 1983 16' unk High Battle Creek Upper WD of Ramsey- Washington Metro Battle Creek Flood Risk Reduction 1983 18' unk High Hansen Park City of New Brighton Rice Creek tributary Recreation 7’ Low Keller Lake RWMWD Keller Creek Recreation 1938 12' Gravity Low Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 32 Name Owner River Primary Purpose Year Built NID Height Dam Type Classification Round Lake USFWS Rice Creek tributary Water Supply 1960 10' Other, Earth Low Source: National Inventory of Dams, Minnesota DNR 3.6.3 EXTENT In the U.S., a common practice among federal and state dam safety officials is to classify dams according to the potential impact a dam failure or breach would have on upstream or downstream areas or locations remote from the dam. Three classification levels are used: Low, Significant, and High. Table 13 explains these classifications. Table 13. Dam Hazard Potential Classification System Dam Hazard Potential Classification System Classification Summary Potential Loss of Life Economic, Environmental, and Lifeline Losses Low Hazard Dams assigned the Low Hazard potential classification are those where failure or misoperation results in no probable loss of human life and low economic and/or environmental losses. Losses are principally limited to the owner’s property. None expected Low; generally limited to owner Significant Hazard Dams assigned the Significant Hazard potential classification are those dams where failure or misoperation results in no probable loss of human life but can cause economic loss, environmental damage, disruption of lifeline facilities, or can impact other concerns. Significant Hazard potential classification dams are often located in predominantly rural or agricultural areas but could be located in areas with population and significant infrastructure. None Expected Yes High Hazard Dams assigned the High Hazard potential classification are those where failure or misoperation will probably cause loss of human life. Probable; one or more expected Yes (but not necessary for this classification) Source: National Inventory of Dams Any owner of a dam with a hazard potential classification of High is required to develop an emergency action plan (EAP). An EAP is a formal document that identifies potential emergency conditions at a dam Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 33 and specifies preplanned actions to be followed to minimize potential property damage and loss of life. Every EAP must be tailored to site-specific conditions but generally contains six basic elements: • Notification flowchart • Emergency detection, evaluation, and classification • Roles and responsibilities • Preparedness activities • Inundation maps • Appendices Dam failure is the collapse or failure of an impoundment that causes significant downstream flooding. The principal consequences of dam failure are injury, loss of life, and significant downstream property damage. The energy of water stored behind even a small dam is capable of causing loss of life and significant property damage to people living downstream. The collapse or structural failure of a dam may be caused by severe storm, earthquake, improper maintenance, erosion, or acts of terrorism. A failure in a dam upstream can cause additional strain and failure risk to dams further downstream. The Battle Creek dams are the only dams located within Ramsey County that are classified as High and have developed EAPs for review. The Coon Rapids Dam and the St. Anthony Falls Upper and Lower Locks and Dams are classified as significant and have also written EAPs. 3.6.4 HISTORY There have been no dam failures in Ramsey County in the past, though there have been several dam failures within the State of Minnesota. Most reported failures have been in low hazard dams, with at least one exception; the Thomson Dam in northeastern Minnesota overtopped in 2012 due to heavy rains, causing significant damage to its hydroelectric station and contributing to flooding downstream. There have been no known deaths, injuries, or property damage from dam or levee failures in the county. The effects on life and property in the area could be significant if a dam were to fail because of the nature of the built environment underneath it. 3.6.5 PROBABILITY The probability of a specific dam failing in any given year is extremely low. Some common causes of dam failures include overtopping, foundation defects, cracking, inadequate maintenance, or piping and seepage. According to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, the primary cause of reported dam failures between 2010 – 2019 was overtopping, most often due to flooding events. 3.6.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change can significantly affect the risk and severity of dam and levee failures. The changes most likely to impact Ramsey County are: • Changes in seasonal patterns and increased precipitation intensity – more frequent and intense rainfall events or earlier spring snowmelt can result in higher risk of flooding, putting additional stress on dams and levees. According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Climate Change Information website, heavy rains are now more common in Minnesota and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 34 more intense than at any time on record. Climate projections indicate these big rains will continue increasing into the future. • Increased extreme weather events – more frequent and severe storms can cause a higher risk for dam or levee overtopping. • Temperature changes, including increased freeze-thaw cycles – this could impact the integrity of dam and levee foundations. • Increased demand on water resources – increased demand has the potential for more frequent drawdowns of reservoirs and added stress on dam operations and structures. 3.6.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.6.7.1 People All individuals who live, work, and recreate in areas downstream of the dams are at risk if they are unable to escape the inundation zone following a failure. Inadequate warning from public warning systems, such as those provided through Everbridge, local radio stations, and other means can increase the number of people at risk. Rising water from a dam failure can cause the same type of impacts as riverine and/or flash flooding, including injuries and fatalities from drowning, blunt force trauma, or exposure. If inundation is expected, populations will likely need to be evacuated and may lose access temporarily or long-term to housing, workplace, and other facilities. Not only can this have immediate physical impacts on people, it can also have longer-term mental health impacts as people work through the process of having their lives drastically altered. 3.6.7.2 Property Inundation from dam failure can cause minor damage up to total loss of structures, utilities, and roadways. In addition, inundation is likely to impact phone lines, potable water, cable, and electricity; wastewater and recovery time for these lifelines may be extended. The one high hazard dam located in Ramsey County, Battle Creek Dam, is situated within Battle Creek Regional Park. Battle Creek runs through the central eastern metropolitan area of the county. It primarily flows through wooded parks before emptying into Pigs Eye Lake and eventually discharging to the Mississippi River. Neighborhoods and public spaces adjacent to the creek, particularly near Pigs Eye Lake could be inundated by a sudden release of water if the Battle Creek Dam were to fail. 3.6.7.3 Environment The natural environment is also at risk for impacts caused by dam failure. River habitats, and nearby wetlands, meadows, and wooded areas may suffer from sedimentation and pollution caused by hazardous materials (e.g., pesticides, fuel, sewage). Floodwaters may cause significant erosion and can harm wildlife through drowning, disease, and disruption of habitat. A sudden release of water could erode stream banks, damage wetlands, and disrupt the ecosystems and wildlife habitats of Battle Creek Park. A failure of Battle Creek Dam could also send sediment, debris, and pollutants into Pigs Eye Lake and, eventually, into the Mississippi River, impacting water quality and aquatic life. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 35 3.6.7.4 County and Community Operations Of the dams located in Ramsey County, the Battle Creek dams (Battle Creek, Battle Creek Middle, and Battle Creek Upper) are classified as High. These are located within the Battle Creek Regional Park which should limit the impact to county and community operations if there is a failure. 3.6.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Loss of life and injury due to sudden flooding. • Displacement of residents from inundated areas, leading to temporary or long-term evacuation. • Contamination of water systems, leading to public health impacts. • Disruption of daily life and access to essential services (e.g., healthcare, education). Impact on Responders • Increased risk and operational challenges to emergency responders due to rapid onset of flooding and compromised access to affected areas, complicating rescue and relief efforts. • Strain on emergency services, including search and rescue operations and medical response. • Potential exposure to hazardous materials released during the flood. Continuity of Operations • Disruption of governmental and critical services (e.g., water treatment, power supply). • Long-term impacts on the ability to resume normal operations. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Destruction or severe damage to homes, businesses, and public buildings. • Short- and long-term structural damage to affected infrastructure, requiring extensive repair or rebuilding. • Potential for cascading failures in other infrastructure (e.g., electrical grid, transportation systems). Impact on the Environment • Extensive erosion and sedimentation, altering waterways and landscapes. • Long-term damage to ecosystems, including loss of habitat and biodiversity. • Contamination of soil and water, affecting agriculture and drinking water sources. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Immediate and long-term economic losses due to damage to businesses and property. • Costs associated with emergency response, recovery, and reconstruction. • Loss of income and employment in affected areas. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 36 • Decreased property values and potential long-term economic decline in the region. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Erosion of public trust in local and regional authorities if the dam failure is perceived as preventable or if the response is inadequate. • Increased scrutiny and criticism of regulatory and oversight bodies responsible for dam safety. 3.7 Drought 3.7.1 PROFILE Drought is a prolonged period of significant below-average precipitation in a given location. It is a normal phase in the climate cycle of most regions, originating from a deficiency of precipitation over an extended period of time, usually a season or more. Drought can lead to water shortages. Droughts are climate patterns that occur over long periods of time as the result of many causes. These patterns are often exacerbated by climatic patterns such as La Nina, human activities such as over- extraction of groundwater, and inefficient water use practices. Anomalies of precipitation and temperature may last from several months to several decades. How long they last depend on interactions between the atmosphere and the oceans, soil moisture and land surface processes, topography, internal dynamics, and the accumulated influence of global weather systems. 3.7.2 LOCATION Drought is a regional hazard, impacting large areas of land at once. The entire planning area is susceptible to drought conditions. Figure 3 shows an example of drought conditions from November 2024. Drought condition maps are updated weekly. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 37 Figure 3. Drought Conditions Source: United States Drought Monitor 3.7.3 EXTENT The entirety of the county is susceptible to any of the classifications of drought, up to and including D4 drought as outlined in Figure 4. Drought Classification Categories Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 38 Figure 4. Drought Classification Categories Source: United States Drought Monitor 3.7.4 HISTORY Minnesota typically experiences some degree of drought each year. Throughout the years, these droughts have varied in severity and duration. Major droughts were recorded in the 1930s, peaking between 1934 and 1936, in 1950s, peaking in 1956, and one of the driest winters on record, the winter of 1976-1977. More recently, notable droughts were recorded in 1988, 2006-2009, and 2012-2013. One of the most severe droughts in recent years, the 2021 drought affected much of Minnesota. Extremely low precipitation and high temperatures led to water shortages, record-low lake levels, and significant impacts on agriculture and ecosystems. Relevant to this, wildfires were also a major concern, with several large fires occurring in the state. Figure 5 illustrates the proportion of land area within the county that has been affected by different levels of drought severity since 2000, and the slight trend toward more frequent and severe drought activity in recent years. Monitoring drought trends provides critical data to assess risk, enhance preparedness, and make informed policy decisions. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 39 Figure 5. Historical Droughts in Ramsey County Source: United States Drought Monitor Members of the LPT noted that most jurisdictions in Ramsey County have instituted water restrictions, mostly focusing on lawn watering on even/odd days. The LPT also noted that only the Governor of Minnesota can completely restrict water usage. 3.7.5 PROBABILITY The probability of a drought in Ramsey County depends on various climatic factors, which vary from year to year. The United States Drought Monitor tracks drought impacts weekly at a variety of jurisdiction levels, including at the county level. Drought conditions were reviewed for a total of 1,257 weeks between the first week of January 2000 and the week of August 20, 2024. Ramsey County experienced some level of drought condition in 44% of the recorded weeks, with the vast majority of those drought conditions spent in the lower echelon of drought severity. FEMA’s National Risk Index tool notes that Ramsey County is at a very low risk of drought, although this is based on agricultural impacts only. 3.7.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change is expected to alter precipitation patterns, temperatures, and extreme weather events, which could all contribute to the frequency, severity, and duration of droughts. Changes in precipitation patterns. It is anticipated that there will be increased variability in precipitation including irregular rainfall and seasonal shifts which could impact the availability of water throughout the year. For Ramsey County, warmer winter temperatures could lead to a shift from snow to more rainfall, resulting in reduced snowpack and less water stored for spring thaw. This could impact the availability of water for critical growing seasons. Since 1866, the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has identified 19 historical “mega-rain” events, in which six inches of rain fall over more than 1,000 square miles. More than half of these events occurred in the past 10 years. These mega-rain events have become four times more frequent since the year 2000 as compared to the previous 30 years. According to the University of Minnesota Climate Change Partnership, future Minnesotans will likely see longer dry periods and more flash droughts with heavier rain events in between. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 40 Temperature increases. Higher temperatures will likely lead to increased evaporation rates and soil moisture depletion, both have the potential to significantly impact plants, crops, and vegetation. More frequent and prolonged heatwaves, which can stress water resources and increase the likelihood of drought conditions, are also a potential impact. According to DNR, the average temperatures in Minnesota have increased by almost 3 degrees (F) since 1895, and the 10 warmest years on record for Minnesota have occurred in the past 20 years. Increases in temperature are expected to continue. Extreme weather events. Droughts are expected to increase in severity and lead to persistent dry conditions. Additionally, it is also predicted that intense rainfall events will increase, leading to flash floods. This will not ease drought conditions and could, in fact, lead to intensified flood-drought cycles. 3.7.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.7.7.1 People According to the National Drought Mitigation Center, droughts have both direct and indirect impacts on people. All individuals who live, work, and recreate within the county are at risk from the impacts of drought. Drought can lead to impacts on the water supply, and agriculture impacts. Health effects such as an increased risk of respiratory issues due to dry, dusty conditions can also impact residents of Ramsey County. 3.7.7.2 Property Structures, utilities, and transportation are minimally impacted by drought. Drought’s impacts on soils can impact home and building foundations; according to the Drought Impact Reporter (DIR), the Mankato Free Press reported on some Twin Cities homes having developed cracks in foundations and interior walls due to drought conditions in 2022. All property in the county is vulnerable to the impacts of drought. Drought can also create water supply challenges by reducing groundwater availability for domestic and government uses. The DIR notes multiple instances since the year 2000 of water usage restrictions. 3.7.7.3 Environment Drought is significantly impactful to the environment and natural resources. Long-term drought can impact lake and river levels. It impacts agriculture through crop loss, insect infestations, plant diseases, and wind erosion. Algae blooms occur in the river, and streams may be cut off. Environmental losses also include plants and wildlife, because air and water quality can plummet with associated dust, wildland fires, and habitat loss. Extreme heat alongside drought may amplify these impacts. 3.7.7.4 County and Community Operations The impact of a drought on a community can be profound, impacting water supply, agriculture, economy, public health, and the environment. Drought can strain on water systems and infrastructure – increased demand and decreased supply can stress the water infrastructure, possibly leading to failure and the need to invest in costly maintenance and/or new infrastructure to ensure a reliable water supply. Drought can impact operations that requires water to function; a key example is the fire service. Drought can also reduce the availability of potable water, leading to water rationing and restrictions, for residential areas and agriculture. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 41 3.7.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Water scarcity, leading to restricted access to potable water for drinking, hygiene, and sanitation. • Increased health risks, including dehydration, malnutrition, and respiratory issues from poor air quality due to dust. • Rising food prices and potential food shortages due to reduced agricultural output. • Mental health impacts from prolonged stress, uncertainty, and potential displacement. Impact on Responders • Strain on emergency services to manage water distribution, firefighting, and health services. Increased demand for medical services due to heat-related illnesses and poor air quality. • Challenges in managing public order, particularly if water shortages lead to unrest or conflicts over resources. Continuity of Operations • Disruption of water-dependent operations, including agriculture, industry, and public utilities. • Need for water rationing or prioritizing critical services, such as healthcare and firefighting. • Challenges in maintaining normal government operations due to resource scarcity and increased demands on infrastructure. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Damage to infrastructure such as water treatment plants, reservoirs, and pipelines due to overuse or drying up. • Increased wear and tear on buildings and roads due to heat stress and lack of moisture. • Potential for increased fire hazards, leading to property loss and infrastructure damage. Impact on the Environment • Degradation of ecosystems, including loss of wetlands, forests, and wildlife habitats. • Reduced water levels in rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, impacting aquatic life and biodiversity. • Increased soil erosion and desertification, leading to long-term land degradation. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Decreased river levels impacting movement of goods in/out of the county. • Significant economic losses in agriculture, particularly in crop and livestock production. • Reduced industrial productivity due to water shortages, impacting sectors like manufacturing, energy, and mining. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 42 • Long-term economic downturn from loss of revenue, increased unemployment, and higher costs for water and food imports. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Criticism of water management policies, including allocation, conservation, and infrastructure investment. Potential for social unrest or political challenges if the public perceives inequities or failures in drought response efforts. 3.8 Floods 3.8.1 PROFILE Floods occur when water inundates land that is typically dry. This can occur during periods of intense rainfall, high tides coupled with storm surges, rapid snowmelt, or the failure of dams or levees. Damaging floods may happen with only a few inches of water, or it may cover a house to the rooftop. Flood events can develop in a matter of minutes or evolve over an extended timeframe, persisting for days, weeks, or more. Among all natural disasters related to weather, floods are the most frequent and have the broadest impact, often being the primary type of weather-related calamity affecting reservations. Flash or urban flooding occurs when storm sewers and other drainage systems are overwhelmed by the amount of rain falling in a short period of time. The National Weather Service (NWS) gives the advice “Turn Around, Don’t Drown” for flash floods. What makes flash floods dangerous is their sudden nature and fast-moving water. Flooding is a hazard that can strike in any U.S. state or territory, as well as any global location prone to rainfall. In the United States, floods claim more lives annually than tornadoes, hurricanes, or lightning strikes. High-risk areas for flash floods include densely populated regions, vicinities adjacent to rivers, and locales near dams. Intense downpours have the potential to induce floods even on parched ground; areas recently affected by wildfires in mountainous regions are particularly vulnerable, and ice jams along with snowmelt are additional factors that can contribute to flash floods. 3.8.2 LOCATION Those communities along the banks of the Mississippi, including the City of Saint Paul, are particularly vulnerable to riverine flooding. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 43 Figure 6. 100-Year Floodplain in Ramsey County Source: 2019 MHMP Ramsey County Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 44 The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is a federal program that provides flood insurance to property owners, renters and business located in communities with mapped floodplains that opt to participate in the program. To participate in the NFIP, a community must: • Adopt a floodplain ordinance that meets or exceeds minimum NFIP criteria, including regulations on land use, development controls, and building codes within the floodplain, as defined by the community’s Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). • Pass a resolution of intent to participate in the program. • Comply with FEMA minimum standards for floodplain management. • Enforce enacted regulations. The following Ramsey County communities participate in the NFIP: • City of Arden Hills • City of Blaine (Ramsey/Anoka County) • City of Falcon Heights • City of Gem Lake • City of Lauderdale • City of Little Canada • City of Maplewood • City of Mounds View • City of New Brighton • City of North Saint Paul • City of Roseville • City of Shoreview • City of Spring Lake Park (Ramsey/Anoka Counties) • City of St. Anthony (Ramsey/Hennepin Counties) • City of Saint Paul • City of Vadnais Heights • City of White Bear Lake (Ramsey/Washington Counties) • Township of White Bear The City of North Oaks has a current effective map date of June 4, 2010, but is not a member of the NFIP. 3.8.3 EXTENT In hazard analysis, the 100-year and 500-year floodplains maps are utilized for understanding flood risk and informing land-use planning, emergency response, and infrastructure development. These designations represent areas that have a 1% (100-year) and 0.2% (500-year) chance of flooding in any given year. These maps help identify areas most at risk of flooding, which is vital for minimizing damage and ensuring public safety. 100-Year Floodplain: This area is commonly used as the baseline for regulatory and insurance purposes. It is the standard by which flood insurance requirements are determined, and it guides zoning regulations, construction codes, and infrastructure projects. Because these areas are more likely to experience flooding, they are most often prioritized for flood prevention and mitigation measures. 500-Year Floodplain: Although the likelihood of flooding in these areas is lower, the 500-year floodplain helps to identify areas that could be affected by more extreme events, including critical infrastructure, Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2 such as hospitals, emergency facilities, and power plants, where the consequences of flooding would be severe. 3.8.4 HISTORY The National Climatic Data Center Storm Events Database was consulted for records of historical floods and flash flooding. The earliest records occurred in 1997. Since 1997, Ramsey County has experienced six major flood events, causing $4.3 million in property damage and no injuries or fatalities. The county has also experienced fifteen major flash flood events causing over $700k in property damage, one fatality and one injury. Figure 7 shows flood and flash flood history in Ramsey County. Figure 7. Ramsey County Historical Floods, 1997 - August 2024 Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Federally Declared Disaster Saint Paul 7/5/2020 Flash Flood 0 0 Unknown Ramsey County March – April 2019 Flood 0 0 unknown Yes Saint Paul 9/17/2015 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Saint Paul 6/18/2014 Flood 0 0 $1,900,000 Yes Falcon Heights 6/21/2013 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Saint Paul 6/21/2013 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown New Brighton 8/16/2011 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown White Bear Lake 7/16/2011 Flash Flood 0 0 $500,000 Ramsey County 3/16/2011 Flash Flood Unk Unk Unknown Yes Little Canada 8/10/2010 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Saint Paul 6/26/2010 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Saint Paul 3/20/2010 Flood 0 0 $2,400,000 Yes Saint Paul 9/20/2007 Flash Flood 1 0 $200,000 Countywide 10/4/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Ramsey County 10/4/2005 Flood 0 0 unknown North Portion 9/21/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Ramsey Co. 6/20/2005 Flash Flood 0 0 $2,000 Saint Paul 6/25/2003 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Vadnais Heights 7/28/2002 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 3 Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Federally Declared Disaster Ramsey County 5/1/2001 Flood 0 0 unknown Yes Ramsey County 4/1/2001 Flood 0 0 unknown Roseville 9/2/2000 Flash Flood 0 0 unknown Saint Paul 7/1/1997 Flash Flood 0 1 unknown Ramsey County 4/4/1997 Flood 0 0 unknown Source: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information Flooding in 2010 was caused by accumulating snowfall across the Upper Midwest and Northern Plains, with snowfall water equivalent amounts as high as six inches. Freezing temperatures broke in March of that year, accelerating melting and unleashing 3-6 inches of liquid water on the surface. Ice jams exacerbated flooding problems. The flooding caused $2.4 million in property damages, and no deaths or injuries. Flooding in 2014 directly impacted Saint Paul. Parts of Minnesota received 10-12 inches of rain over a week in June, which was anywhere from 400-600% above normal amounts. The Twin Cities had their wettest start of the year since 1871. Saint Paul Airport deployed a flood wall which closed two of their shorter runways. Due to floodwaters affecting downtown Saint Paul and covering Harriet Island, the Taste of Minnesota and 4th of July fireworks show were moved to different locations. High water on the Mississippi also forced the Minnesota Centennial Showboat to postpone a week of shows. This flooding caused $1.9 million in property damages, and no deaths or injuries. A flood’s crest is the level at which a river peaks before it starts to recede. Figure 8 shows historical flood crests for flooding in the Mississippi River at Saint Paul and South Saint Paul, as well as historical flood crests for Rice Creek in Mounds View. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 4 Figure 8. Historical Flood Crests Historical Flood Crests for Mississippi River at Saint Paul, MN Date Height (Feet) 4/16/1965 26.01 4/15/1969 24.52 4/18/2001 23.76 4/30/2001 23.20 4/13/1997 22.37 4/16/1952 22.02 3/31/2013 20.19 6/29/2024 20.17 (P) 6/26/2014 20.13 Historical Flood Crests for Mississippi River at South Saint Paul, MN Date Height (Feet) 4/29/2001 703.04 4/18/2001 703.03 4/13/1997 702.90 6/26/2014 700.94 6/25/1993 699.98 3/30/2011 698.95 3/24/2010 698.56 7/02/2013 694.84 6/03/2012 694.02 4/01/2009 693.87 Historical Flood Crests for Rice Creek in Mounds View, MN Date Height (Feet) 6/19/2014 12.25 8/16/2011 11.17 5/24/2012 10.49 5/19/2013 10.43 3/22/2010 9.55 7/6/2015 9.45 Source: NOAA Water Prediction Service 3.8.5 PROBABILITY Minor flooding is an annual occurrence in Ramsey County. According to the Storm Events Database, six major flood events occurred over the 32-year period presented, with a probability of a major flood event every 5 years. Fifteen flash/urban flooding events occurred in the same period, presenting a probability of almost one major flash flood every two years. As storms become more severe and rainfall becomes heavier, these probabilities may increase. 3.8.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change could significantly impact riverine flooding through changes in seasonal and increased precipitation and intensity, changes in snowmelt and runoff patterns, increased stress on flood management infrastructure, such as dams, levees, and stormwater systems, and altered river and watershed dynamics. These changes may result in rising river levels, increased risk of flood-related damage, and more intense and frequent flooding events. Similarly to potential changes to riverine flooding, climate change could also impact flash flooding through increased frequency and intensity of heavy rainfall, altered seasonal precipitation patterns, and stress on stormwater infrastructure. In addition, increased urbanization and expanded impervious surfaces, changes in land use and vegetation, and changing soil and drought cycles may lead to more frequent and severe flash floods, with higher runoff and rapid onset, particularly in urban areas of the county. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 5 3.8.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.8.7.1 People Flash floods and river flooding can lead to injury or loss of life. In urban areas, rapidly rising water levels can trap residents in their homes, vehicles, or other spaces, often in immediate danger and requiring rescue. The poorest residents suffer disproportionately to flood situations, especially those who have been less able to fund homeowner’s insurance to protect against flood losses. Mental health issues are experienced by people who have experience flood losses, including anxiety, fear, anger, anger, sadness and grief. 3.8.7.2 Property Homes and businesses in low-lying areas and in flood-prone areas are at significant risk of flooding and damage. It is common for these structures to suffer structural damage, water in lower levels, and loss of personal property. Facilities in these areas can also see declines in property values and increased insurance costs. Hazus runs from the 2019 plan estimate the number of households that are expected to be displaced from their homes due to the flood and the associated potential evacuation. Hazus also estimates those displaced people that may require accommodations in temporary public shelters. The model estimates 2,015 households may be displaced due to the flood. Displacement includes households evacuated from within or very near to the inundated area. Of these, the model estimates 342 people (out of a total population of 508,640) may seek temporary shelter in public shelters. Repetitive loss properties are defined as properties that have had 2 or more flood insurance claims of $1,000 or more in any rolling 10-year period. Property owners are asked to consider mitigation activities such as acquisition, relocation, or elevation, among other options. FEMA’s Repetitive Loss (RL) properties strategy is to eliminate or reduce the damage to property and the disruption to life caused by repeated flooding of the same properties. Property owners are notified of their status by FEMA. There are two repetitive loss properties in Ramsey County, both located in the City of Saint Paul. Four losses have been recorded between the two properties, with an average payment of $10,610. None are classified as “Severe Repetitive Loss” (SRL). An SRL property is defined as a residential property that is covered under an NFIP flood insurance policy and: • That has at least 4 NFIP claim payments (including building and contents) over $5,000 each, and the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeds $20,000; or • For which at least 2 separate claims payments (building payments only) have been made with the cumulative amount of the building portion of such claims exceeding the market value of the building. • For both (a) and (b) above, at least 2 of the referenced claims must have occurred within any 10- year period and must be greater than 10 days apart. 3.8.7.3 Environment Detrimental environmental effects of flooding can include soil and bank erosion, bed erosion, siltation or landslides. It can damage vegetation and pollutants carried by flood water can impact on water quality, Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 6 habitats and flora and fauna. Flooding also brings with it the potential for contamination that leads to waterborne diseases, as well as hazardous material, raw sewage, and debris contamination. Flood waters often pollute drinking water supplies. When flood waters recede, toxic mold may remain, which can increase incidences of asthma and other respiratory distress. Flooding can however play a beneficial role in natural habitats. 3.8.7.4 County and Community Operations Essential facilities encounter the same impacts as other buildings within the flood boundary: structural failure, extensive water damage to the facility, and loss of facility functionality (i.e. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). However, none of Ramsey County’s essential facilities (care facilities, fire stations, police stations and schools) included in the 2019 Hazus analysis are located within the flood boundary. 3.8.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Risk of drowning, injury, or death due to sudden and fast-moving floodwaters. • Displacement of residents, leading to temporary or permanent relocation and the loss of personal property. • Health risks from contaminated water, including waterborne diseases and hazardous materials. • Disruption of daily life, including access to transportation, healthcare, and basic services. Impact on Responders • Increased danger to emergency responders operating in hazardous conditions, including swift water, debris, and unstable structures. • Overextension of resources and personnel due to the immediate and widespread nature of the response required. • Challenges in coordinating rescue and relief efforts, particularly in rapidly changing flood conditions and possible damage to roads, bridges, and other critical infrastructure. Continuity of Operations • Disruption of essential services, including power outages, water supply interruption, and communication failures. • Challenges in maintaining public safety and order, particularly if critical infrastructure is compromised. • Delays in recovery efforts due to damage to roads, bridges, and other transportation networks. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Extensive damage or destruction of homes, businesses, and public buildings due to inundation and debris impact. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 7 • Severe damage to critical infrastructure such as roads, bridges, sewage systems, healthcare, and electrical grids. • High costs for repairs, reconstruction, and mitigation efforts, potentially overwhelming local resources. Impact on the Environment • Erosion of soil, riverbanks, and landscapes, leading to long-term ecological changes. • Pollution of rivers, lakes, and groundwater with debris, chemicals, and sewage from floodwaters. • Destruction of natural habitats, negatively affecting wildlife and biodiversity. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Immediate economic losses from damage to commercial properties, agricultural lands, and infrastructure. • Long-term economic challenges due to the cost of rebuilding and the potential for reduced investment and tourism. • Potential loss of jobs and income. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Erosion of public trust if the flooding is perceived as preventable or if the response is inadequate. • Increased scrutiny of floodplain management, land-use planning, and emergency preparedness policies. 3.9 Geologic Hazards 3.9.1 PROFILE A geologic hazard is an adverse geological condition causing damage or loss of property or life. These hazards only become hazards when they impact life or property and are very much a normal part of environmental processes. Ramsey County is at risk of a variety of geologic hazards, the most common of which are: • Landslide: The downward movement of a mass of rock, soil, and debris along a slope or cliff face. This movement can range from gradual, slow displacement to rapid, catastrophic events. Landslides are typically triggered by factors such as heavy rainfall, earthquakes, volcanic activity, or human activities that destabilize slopes. Examples of landslides include rock falls and debris flows. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the most common type of landslides in Minnesota are shallow slope failures that occur during heavy rain. • Land subsidence: The gradual sinking or settling of the earth's surface, often due to the compaction of underground layers of soil, sediment, or rock. This phenomenon can occur naturally or be exacerbated by human activities such as groundwater extraction, oil and gas extraction, mining, or the drainage of organic soils. Examples of land subsidence include Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 8 sinkholes and soil compaction. According to the USGS, more than 80% of the identified subsidence in the United States is a consequence of human impact on subsurface water and is an often-overlooked environmental consequence of land and water-use practices. Increasing development can exacerbate subsidence problems and initiate new ones. 3.9.2 LOCATION Parts of Ramsey County sit on a thick layer of limestone rock that is riddled with small holes and caves, known as karst topography. Its large rivers and hills also create many slopes and cliffs. Heavy surface rains may cause karst landscapes to fail causing landslides or sinkholes. Figure 9 shows karst distribution throughout Minnesota. Figure 9. Karst Distribution in MN Source: www.ramseycounty.us Figure 10 displays unstable soils and bedrock in south Ramsey County. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 9 Figure 10. Unstable Soils and Bedrock in South Ramsey County Source: Ramsey 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 3.9.3 EXTENT 3.9.3.1 Landslide To determine the extent of a landslide hazard, it is essential to identify affected areas and assess the probability of a landslide occurring within a specified period. Key natural variables that influence landslide activity include soil properties, topographic position and slope, and historical occurrences. Predicting landslides remains challenging, even with ideal conditions and reliable data. Consequently, landslide hazards are often represented by landslide incidence and/or susceptibility, as defined below: • Landslide incidence refers to the number of landslides occurring in a specific geographic area. A high incidence indicates that over 15% of the area has experienced landslides. Medium incidence means that 1.5% to 15% of the area has been affected, while low incidence indicates that less than 1.5% of the area has experienced landslides. • Landslide susceptibility refers to the likelihood of geologic formations responding to natural or artificial alterations, such as slope cutting, loading, or unusually high precipitation. Areas with a history of numerous landslides are particularly vulnerable to new movements under these conditions. Susceptibility is influenced by slope angle and the underlying geologic material. It identifies potential landslide-prone areas but does not specify a time frame for when a landslide might occur. High, medium, and low susceptibility are categorized using the same percentages as landslide incidence: over 15% for high, 1.5% to 15% for medium, and less than 1.5% for low. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 10 Common techniques for measuring and monitoring the extent of landslides include field surveys (e.g., geological mapping, slope measurements), remote sensing (e.g., satellite imagery, aerial photography), ground-based monitoring (e.g., GPS, inclinometers, extensometers), and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). 3.9.3.2 Land Subsidence Subsidence can develop gradually or suddenly due to natural processes, such as karst sinkholes in areas with soluble bedrock, or due to human activities. In the U.S., subsidence has affected over 17,000 square miles across 45 states, with annual costs estimated at $125 million. The primary causes include aquifer-system compaction, organic soil drainage, underground mining, hydro compaction, natural compaction, sinkholes, and thawing permafrost. Common techniques for measuring and monitoring the extent of land subsidence include geodetic surveys (e.g., leveling surveys, GPS/GNSS monitoring), remote sensing (e.g., Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar [InSAR], satellite imagery), borehole measurements (e.g., extensometers, piezometers), and LiDAR. 3.9.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a moderate history of impactful geologic incidents. The MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) paper Historical Landslide Inventory for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area was consulted for incident records. Table 14. Significant Geological Hazard Events in Ramsey County, MN Est. Date Type Location Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description May 13, 1879 Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Rock and sediment July 28, 1892 Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Unknown Winter 1969 Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Sediment July 24, 1987 Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Glacial sediment. This was a late-night event associated with a slow- moving thunderstorm. April 8, 2011 Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Rock. A boulder the size of two minivans struck and demolished a local bakery. May 1, 2011 Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Glacial sediment and fill May 22, 2013 Landslide Saint Paul 2/4 u/k Rock and sediment. A rockslide killed two and injured two fourth graders at Lilydale Regional Park. Two firefighters were also Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 11 Est. Date Type Location Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description injured in the response. June 19, 2014 Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Sediment. Heavy rainfall caused a landslide beneath a hospital at the University of Minnesota. April 28, 2018 Landslide Saint Paul 0/0 $766k An estimated 400,000 pounds of rock and soil came loose on the bluff to cover Wabasha Street between Plato Boulevard and Cesar Chavez Street. 9 Significant Incidents -- -- 2/4 $766,000 total claimed -- Sources: MN DNR and 2019 Ramsey MHMP During Planning Meeting #2, members of the LPT noted a landslide in Gem Lake that caused disruption to nearby railroad tracks, although further research didn’t find any written record of it. 3.9.5 PROBABILITY Geologic hazard incidents are an occasional occurrence within Ramsey County. Six significant incidents have occurred since 1970, giving a probability of approximately an 11% chance of a significant geologic hazard incident occurring within any given year. During Planning Meeting #2, the LPT noted that mitigation of geologic hazard risks has been implemented across the county; as mitigation continues, probability of incidents will decrease. 3.9.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change can significantly influence geologic hazards in Rasmey County through various mechanisms. Here are some key impacts: • Increased Frequency of Heavy Rainfall: More intense and frequent heavy rainfall can saturate soils, increasing the likelihood of landslides, especially in areas with steep slopes or unstable terrain. It can also lead to more frequent and severe flooding, which can erode riverbanks and destabilize the ground, potentially triggering landslides and soil erosion. Heavy rains in Minnesota are now more frequent and intense than ever recorded. Long-term observation sites have shown significant increases in 1-inch and 3-inch rainfalls, as well as the heaviest annual rainfall events. Since 2000, the state has also experienced a notable rise in widespread extreme rainstorms. Rainfalls that historically ranked in the top 2% are becoming more common. Climate projections suggest that these heavy rains will continue to increase in the future. • Temperature Extremes: Increased variability in temperatures can lead to more frequent freeze- thaw cycles, which can cause soil and rock to expand and contract. This process can weaken slopes and contribute to landslides and rockfalls. Minnesota has warmed by 3.0°F between 1895 and 2020, with the most dramatic changes occurring in recent decades. Since 1970, nearly every Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 12 year has been warmer than the 20th-century average. Each of the top 10 warmest years on record occurred between 1998 and 2020. These warming trends are expected to continue through the 21st century. • Drought: Extended periods of drought can dry out soils, making them more susceptible to erosion when rains do return. This can lead to a loss of fertile topsoil and increased sediment in waterways. Groundwater depletion during droughts can cause land subsidence, particularly in areas where groundwater is heavily relied upon for agriculture and other uses. • Changes in Vegetation: Vegetation helps to stabilize slopes by binding soil with roots. Changes in vegetation patterns due to climate change, such as increased prevalence of invasive species or loss of native plants, can reduce slope stability and increase landslide risk. Northern tree species in Minnesota, such as paper birch, quaking aspen, balsam fir, and black spruce, may begin to decline and shift further north. In their place, warmer-climate species like maples, oaks, and hickories could become more prevalent. These shifts in tree cover will also bring changes to soil habitats. By understanding these impacts, communities in the Ramsey County can develop more effective strategies for mitigating the risks associated with geologic hazards in the context of a changing climate. 3.9.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.9.7.1 People People living in areas with steep terrain are at greater risk of landslides, and those living in floodplains and river valleys may experience greater incidences of flooding and erosion, leading to increased risk of land subsidence and landslides. Additionally, populations in older cities and towns with aging infrastructure are more susceptible to damage from geologic hazards. Similarly, those living in affordable housing may be located in areas more prone to geologic hazards and may be less structurally resilient. 3.9.7.2 Property In residential and commercial areas, houses and critical infrastructure built on or near steep slopes are vulnerable to landslides, especially during periods of heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt. Subdivisions built on filled land or areas with unstable soils may be prone to over time. Infrastructure like roads and highways traversing hilly or unstable terrain are susceptible to landslides and slope failures, as are structures spanning rivers or valleys which can be impacted by erosion and subsidence, affecting stability and safety. Geologic hazards can threaten underground infrastructure such as pipelines for water, wastewater, gas, and electricity, as well as communication cables. 3.9.7.3 Environment Landslides and subsidence can fragment habitats and disrupt ecosystems, affecting wildlife and plant communities. Sedimentation from landslides can degrade water quality in rivers, lakes, and streams, impacting aquatic ecosystems and drinking water sources. Finally, erosion and sedimentation can reduce soil fertility and agricultural productivity, affecting food security and livelihoods. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 13 3.9.7.4 County and Community Operations Roads, bridges, and railways are essential for transporting goods and people. Landslides and land subsidence can block roads or damage bridges, disrupting transportation and emergency response efforts. Utility and communication system grids can be damaged, leading to service interruptions and potentially affecting public health and safety. 3.9.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Risk of injuries or fatalities from sudden landslides or gradual subsidence leading to ground collapse. • Evacuation and temporary relocation of residents from affected areas. • Mental health impacts from displacement and trauma; physical health risks from injuries or exposure to hazardous conditions. Impact on Responders • Difficult terrain and unstable ground conditions hindering emergency response efforts. • Increased risk to responders working in unstable areas prone to further landslides or subsidence. • Need for specialized equipment and training to safely conduct rescue and recovery operations. Impact on Continuity of Operations • Disruption to government services and operations located in or near affected areas. • Potential interruption of critical infrastructure systems, including utilities and transportation networks, if located in landslide or subsidence zones. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Structural damage or total destruction of buildings located in landslide or subsidence zones. • Damage to schools, hospitals, and other public facilities, necessitating repairs or reconstruction. • Road closures, rail line disruptions, and damage to bridges affecting mobility and logistics. • Damage to water, gas, and electricity lines, leading to service outages and potential hazards. Impact on the Environment • Disruption to local ecosystems and wildlife habitats due to ground movement and landscape alteration. • Increased erosion, sedimentation of water bodies, and potential contamination from disrupted underground utilities. • Loss of vegetation cover contributing to further erosion and destabilization of slopes. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 14 • Decrease in property values in high-risk areas, impacting homeowners and local tax revenue. • Disruption to local businesses, leading to financial losses, job displacement, and reduced economic activity. • Significant expenses for rebuilding and repairing damaged infrastructure and properties. • Increased insurance premiums and potential difficulty in obtaining coverage for properties in high-risk zones. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Public perception of the government's ability to manage and mitigate geologic hazards effectively. • Importance of clear and timely communication with the public regarding risks, mitigation measures, and response efforts. • Potential for increased scrutiny of government officials and policies, leading to political challenges or changes in leadership. 3.10 Hazardous Materials 3.10.1 PROFILE Materials considered hazardous are commonly and safely used across communities daily. When a chemical or other substance that may harm health or the environment has been released into the air, water or ground, it is considered a hazardous materials incident. Incidents can occur when materials are being produced, stored, transported, used, or disposed of. Most hazardous incidents are quickly, easily and safely contained; however, potential exists for longer lasting and harmful incidents. This chapter focuses on the following types of incidents: • Spills: Accidental release of hazardous substances can lead to contamination of soil, water, and air. • Pipelines: Leaks or ruptures in pipelines can release hazardous materials into the environment. • Trucking: Transportation accidents involving trucks can result in the release of hazardous cargoes. • Railways: Train derailments or collisions can lead to significant spills of hazardous materials. 3.10.2 LOCATION Due to the unexpected nature of a hazardous materials event, the entirety of Ramsey County would be considered at risk for these types of events. Hazardous materials incidents are classified as either fixed incidents or mobile incidents. Approximately 80%-90% of incidents occur at fixed sites, such as factories and storage facilities. Impacts are typically limited to the site itself, and the immediate surrounding area. Ramsey County is home to a number of chemical plants and facilities, ranging from manufacturing to processing and distribution of chemicals, including 3M Company Headquarters in Maplewood, Ecolab Inc. in Saint Paul, and HB Fuller, located in Vadnais Heights. There are also several large waste and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 15 recycling facilities in the county which handle various types of waste, including hazardous materials. The notable facilities include the Ramsey County Recycling and Energy Center and the Ramsey County Household Hazardous Waste Facility. Other adjacent facilities and private waste management companies also pose hazardous materials risks. Ramsey County is home to several major including on the University of Minnesota, Saint Paul Campus, 3M Company, MN Department of Public Health Laboratory, and EcoLab. Hospitals and healthcare facilities can also be sites for hazardous materials incidents. A number of hospitals and health care facilities located within Ramsey County handle materials as part of their regular operations. The remainder of incidents occur while a material is in transit. These incidents can occur on major roadways, railways, or in pipelines. The following are the most likely locations for mobile accidents to occur within the county: • Transportation Routes o Roadways – Ramsey County is served by a number of major roadways including Interstates 94 (I-94), 35E (I35E), and 694 (I-694); US Highways 52 and 61; and MN State Highways 36 (MN-36), 51 (MN-51), and 280 (MN-280). Additionally, there are a number of major county roads that transverse the region as well. o Intersections/Interchanges – Major intersections/interchanges in Ramsey County include I-94 and I-35E, I-94 and MN-280, and I-694 and I-35E. Other significant urban and suburban intersections are located across the county as well. o Bridges and Overpasses – Ramsey County has a number of key bridges and overpasses including a number that span the Mississippi River and interstate and highway overpasses. o Railroads – Ramsey County is a significant hub for rail transportation in the region, with BNSF Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, Canadian Pacific Railway, and Amtrak providing freight and passenger services with the county. o Airports – While the major airport that services Ramsey County (Minneapolis – Saint Paul International Airport (MSP)) is located in adjacent Hennepin County, portions of Ramsey County will be in the flight path for MSP. In addition, there are two smaller airports located within the County: Saint Paul Downtown Airport (STP) and Lake Elmo Airport. • Pipelines o Oil and Gas Pipelines – Oil and gas pipelines are present in Ramsey County, including natural gas and petroleum products, such as gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. 3.10.3 EXTENT The extent of a hazardous material event can vary widely depending on several factors including physical area affected, environmental impact, population affected, duration, severity of health risks, economic impact, infrastructure affected, response required, and legal and regulatory implications. Hazardous materials are organized into nine classes: • Class 1: Explosives Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 16 • Class 2: Gases • Class 3: Flammable Liquids • Class 4: Flammable Solids • Class 5: Oxidizer • Class 6: Poisonous Materials • Class 7: Radioactive Materials • Class 8: Corrosive Materials • Class 9: Miscellaneous Hazardous Materials Figure 11. Hazardous Materials Classes Source: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 3.10.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has experienced several notable hazardous materials incidents in recent years, including: • University Avenue Chemical Spill. Occurring in Saint Paul in November 1992. A tanker truck carrying hazardous chemicals overturned on University Avenue, causing a significant spill of industrial solvents. This led to an evacuation of nearby businesses and residents, traffic disruption, and road closures for several hours. The spill was contained and cleaned but did pose a risk to public health and the environment. • H.B. Fuller Plant Fire (2002). Occurring in June 2002 at the H.B. Fuller Company plant in Vadnais Heights. A fire broke out at the H.B. Fuller adhesive manufacturing plant, causing the release of hazardous fumes and chemicals. This led to the evacuation of employees and nearby residents Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 17 due to the risk of toxic smoke inhalation, resulting in significant property damage and concerns about air quality. • Saint Paul Riverfront Chemical Leak. Occurring in May 2007 in the riverfront industrial area in Saint Paul. A leak of anhydrous ammonia occurred at an industrial facility near the Mississippi River. This release led to the evacuation of nearby residents and workers and raised concerns about industrial safety and environmental protection along the riverfront. • BNSF Railway Chemical Spill. Occurring in September 2010 at the BNSF Railway yard, Saint Paul. A derailment of a train carrying hazardous materials occurred at the BNSF Railway yard, causing a spill of chemicals, including sulfuric acid. This spill required the evacuation of the immediate area and the deployment of hazmat teams to contain and clean up the hazardous substances. The incident disrupted rail operations and posed a risk to public health and the environment, prompting concerns about potential groundwater contamination and air quality. • Energy Park Drive Industrial Fire. Occurring in July 2015, in the industrial area along Energy Park Drive, Saint Paul. A fire at an industrial facility led to the release of hazardous smoke and chemicals, prompting the evacuation of workers and nearby residents. The incident caused significant property damage and raised concerns about industrial safety and emergency preparedness. A search was run for incidents recorded by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Between 1980 and August 2024, the PHMSA database records 1,828 separate mobile hazardous materials incidents both large and small occurring in the county. Of these, 1,692 occurred on a highway, 95 occurred on rail lines, 39 occurred in the air, and one occurred on the water. 3.10.5 PROBABILITY Determining the exact probability of a hazardous materials incident is challenging due to the variability of factors involved. Smaller hazardous materials incidents are likely to occur frequently due to the large volume of hazardous materials in the county, but a widespread event is less likely to occur due to the controls and regulations in place at larger facilities. The following considerations may influence the likelihood of such incidents: • Presence of industrial facilities, including chemical plants and refineries • Major transportation routes, such as highways, railways, and waterways • Population density in urban areas It is safe to say that minor hazardous materials incidents are a relatively routine occurrence across the county. Large-scale hazardous materials incidents are much rarer. 3.10.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 18 Climate change has the potential to increase the number of hazardous materials incidents, due to changes in population, environment, and production capacity. It is also expected that climate change impacts may exacerbate the impacts of the incidents themselves, depending on the weather, location and type of material. 3.10.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Vulnerability in a hazardous materials incident is highly contingent on the location of the incident and the substance released. 3.10.7.1 People • Health Risks - Hazardous materials can be toxic, flammable, corrosive, or reactive, posing immediate and long-term health risks. Hazardous materials vary greatly in the types of health risks they pose to humans, including the following potential health risks from hazardous materials: thermal, radiological, asphyxiation, chemical, etiological, or mechanical (TRACEM). • Population Density – Areas with high population density, including much of Ramsey County, can increase the number of people potentially impacted by a hazardous material incident. • Proximity to Facilities – Communities located near industrial plants, chemical storage facilities, transportation routes, or waste disposal sites are at a greater risk of exposure. There are a significant number of transportation routes (both rail and road) that traverse the county, on which hazardous materials are carried every day. The City of Roseville has several fuel tank facilities, with approximately 370 semi-trucks, carrying hazardous materials, entering and exiting on a daily basis. 3.10.7.2 Property • Damage to infrastructure – Hazardous materials can cause significant damage to buildings, roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. Corrosive chemicals can degrade materials, and explosions and fires can cause widespread damage. • Economic Costs – the economic impact of hazardous materials incidents can be substantial, including cleanup, property devaluation, and business interruptions. • Long-term contamination – Contamination can persist in buildings and infrastructure, rendering them unusable or requiring costs decontamination or demolition efforts. 3.10.7.3 Environment • Water contamination – Hazardous materials can seep into groundwater or run off into rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, contaminating drinking water and impacting aquatic ecosystems. Jurisdictions, such as Gem Lake, utilize a well water infrastructure, and spills impacting groundwater could have significant impacts to drinking water. • Soil degradation – Hazardous material incidents can lead to soil contamination which can affect plant growth and soil health. Contaminants can persist in the soil for long periods of time which can make land unsuitable for habitation and/or agriculture. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 19 • Air pollution – Hazardous gases or particulates can be released into the air. These can impact air quality and pose respiratory risks for humans and animals. • Ecosystem disruption – Toxic substances can disrupt ecosystems, reduce biodiversity, and affect food chain, possibly causing long-term ecological imbalances. 3.10.7.4 County and Community Operations A hazardous materials incident can have a significant impact on a community. The impacts can be immediate, short-term, and long-term, affecting various aspects of the community including health, environmental, economy, and social well-being. 3.10.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Immediate and long-term health risks, including exposure to toxic substances, chemical burns, respiratory issues, or poisoning. • Potential for widespread panic or fear due to the nature of the hazardous material. • Evacuation of affected areas, leading to temporary displacement and disruption of daily life. Impact on Responders • High risk of exposure to hazardous materials, requiring specialized protective equipment and training. • Challenges in managing the scene, including containment, decontamination, and medical treatment. • Potential injuries or fatalities among responders due to the dangerous nature of the incident. • Strain on emergency response resources, including medical facilities, hazmat teams, and fire services. Continuity of Operations • Disruption of critical services, including transportation, healthcare, and public utilities, due to contamination or evacuation. • Potential shutdown of government buildings or facilities in the affected area, delaying administrative functions. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Contamination of buildings, public spaces, and infrastructure, leading to costly cleanup and decontamination efforts. • Potential destruction or long-term damage to property due to explosions, fires, or chemical corrosion. • Temporary or permanent closure of affected facilities, impacting businesses, schools, and public services. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 20 • Long-term implications for infrastructure integrity if materials seep into soil, groundwater, or air systems. Impact on the Environment • Contamination of air, water, and soil, potentially affecting large areas and leading to short- and long-term ecological damage. • Destruction of natural habitats, with harmful effects on wildlife and plant life. • Challenges in restoring affected environments, with potential for lasting degradation of ecosystems. • Risk of bioaccumulation of hazardous substances in the food chain, affecting both wildlife and human populations. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Significant economic losses due to business closures, property damage, and costs associated with cleanup and decontamination. • Potential long-term economic downturn if the incident affects key industries in the region. • Increased healthcare costs due to treatment of affected individuals and long-term health monitoring. • Potential decrease in property values and attractiveness of the area for investment or development. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Erosion of public trust if the incident is perceived as preventable or if the response is seen as inadequate. • Increased scrutiny and criticism of regulatory and oversight agencies responsible for hazardous materials management. • Pressure to improve safety regulations, emergency response capabilities, and communication strategies to prevent future incidents. 3.11 Summer Weather Hazards 3.11.1 PROFILE The summer weather hazards chapter encompasses natural weather hazards most likely to occur in the spring and summer months. The most common types of summer weather hazards experienced in Ramsey County are described below. • Extreme heat: The NWS does not have a set definition for extreme heat, but instead calibrates the point at which forecasters warn residents based on the region's climate. For central states, including Minnesota, Heat Advisories are issued when the heat index exceeds 100 degrees. Excessive Heat Warnings are issued when the heat index exceeds 105 degrees. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 21 • Heatwave: Heatwaves are periods of abnormally hot weather generally lasting more than two days. Heat waves can occur with or without high humidity. • Hail: Hail forms inside a thunderstorm or other storms with strong updrafts of warm air and downdrafts of cold water. If a water droplet is picked up by the updrafts, it can be carried well above the freezing level. Water droplets freeze when temperatures reach 32 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) or colder. As the frozen droplet begins to fall, it may thaw as it moves into warmer air toward the bottom of the thunderstorm. However, the droplet may be picked up again by another updraft and carried back into the cold air and refreeze. With each trip above and below the freezing level, the frozen droplet adds another layer of ice. The frozen droplet, with many layers of ice, falls to the ground as hail. Most hail is small and typically less than two inches in diameter. • Lightning: Lightning is a bright flash of electrical energy produced by a thunderstorm. All thunderstorms produce lightning and are very dangerous. Lightning ranks as one of the top weather killers in the U.S., where an average of 300 people are injured and 80 are killed each year. Lightning can occur anywhere there is a thunderstorm, often strikes outside the heavy rain in a thunderstorm, and may occur as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. Note that a single summer weather event may include one or more of these hazards. 3.11.2 LOCATION All communities within Ramsey County are vulnerable to summer weather. 3.11.3 EXTENT 3.11.3.1 Extreme Heat and Heatwaves Each NWS Forecast Office issues heat-related alerts as needed. Local offices often work with partners to decide when to issue an alert for a specific area. The Heat Index is a measure of how hot it feels when factoring in the relative humidity at a given location. This can be used as a decision-making tool when issuing heat-related products. The Heat Index is provided as Figure 12. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 22 Figure 12. Heat Index Source: www.weather.gov Heat-related products are described in Table 15. Table 15. NWS Heat-Related Products Product Description Excessive Heat Warning—Take Action! An Excessive Heat Warning is issued within 12 hours of the onset of extremely dangerous heat conditions. The general rule of thumb for this Warning is when the maximum heat index temperature is expected to be 105° or higher for at least 2 days and nighttime air temperatures will not drop below 75°; however, these criteria vary across the country, especially for areas not used to extreme heat conditions. If you don't take precautions immediately when conditions are extreme, you may become seriously ill or even die. Excessive Heat Watches—Be Prepared! Heat watches are issued when conditions are favorable for an excessive heat event in the next 24 to 72 hours. A Watch is used when the risk of a heat wave has increased but its occurrence and timing is still uncertain. Heat Advisory—Take Action! A Heat Advisory is issued within 12 hours of the onset of extremely dangerous heat conditions. The general rule of thumb for this Advisory is when the maximum heat index temperature is expected to be 100° or higher for at least 2 days, and nighttime air temperatures will not drop below 75°; however, these criteria vary across the country, especially for areas that are not used to dangerous heat Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 23 conditions. Take precautions to avoid heat illness. If you don't take precautions, you may become seriously ill or even die. Excessive Heat Outlooks—Be Aware! The outlooks are issued when the potential exists for an excessive heat event in the next 3-7 days. An Outlook provides information to those who need considerable lead time to prepare for the event. Source: www.weather.gov 3.11.3.2 Hail Hail size typically refers to the diameter of the hailstones. Warnings and reports may report hail size through comparisons with real-world objects that correspond to certain diameters. To be considered severe, hail stones must be at least 1 inch in diameter. Hail naming convention, damage estimate, description, and size are provided in Table 16. Table 16. Hail Descriptions and Damage Estimates Hail Name Damage Description Diameter (in.) Small Hail Unlikely Pea 0.25 Marble or Mothball 0.50 Penny or Dime 0.75 Nickel 0.88 Large Hail Minor damage Quarter 1.00 Half Dollar 1.25 Walnut or Ping Pong Ball 1.50 Golf ball 1.75 Very Large Hail Moderate damage Hen's Egg 2.00 Tennis Ball 2.50 Baseball 2.75 Giant Hail Major damage Teacup 3.00 Grapefruit 4.00 Softball 4.50 Source: www.weather.gov 3.11.3.3 Lightning The threat of lightning is largely based on the likelihood that cloud-to-ground lightning (CG) from thunderstorms will occur combined with the anticipated flash rate. With CG lightning, every strike is potentially lethal and has the potential to contribute to other hazards such as wildfire. Flash rate is defined in Table 17. Table 17. CG Lightning Flash Rate Term Description Occasional CG lightning at the rate of 1 to 3 flashes per minute (about 5 to 15 flashes per 5 minutes) associated with a given lightning storm. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 24 Frequent CG lightning at the rate of 4 to 11 flashes per minute (about 20 to 55 flashes per 5 minutes) associated with a given lightning storm. Excessive CG lightning rate of 12 flashes or more per minute (about 60 flashes or more per 5 minutes) and is nearly continuous associated with a given lightning storm. Source: www.weather.gov Lightning risk is also defined as low, moderate, or high as shown in Table 18. Table 18. Lightning Risk Level Definition Low Risk Atmospheric conditions do not support frequent cloud-to-ground lightning strikes. Moderate Risk Thunderstorms are forecast to be scattered in coverage (30-50% chance). Atmospheric conditions support frequent cloud-to-ground lightning strikes. High Risk Thunderstorms are forecast to be numerous or widespread in coverage (60- 100% chance). Atmospheric conditions support continuous and intense cloud-to-ground lightning strikes. Source: www.weather.gov 3.11.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a significant history of damaging windstorms and tornadoes. The National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Storm Events Database was consulted for incident records. According to NCEI records, there have been 243 significant summer weather incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024. This dataset recorded five deaths and two injuries since 1950. Notable summer weather hazard incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 19. Table 19. Notable Summer Weather Hazard Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Type Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description August 9, 1998 Lightning 1/0 None reported One man died because of a lightning strike while under a tree. May 1, 2001 Hail 0/0 $2M Numerous vehicles and buildings were damaged. June 7, 2005 Lightning 0/0 None reported Lightning struck a home on Timberline Trail. The northwest corner of the home caught fire and sheetrock fell on a person lying in bed. August 8, 2005 Lightning 0/0 None reported Lightning struck a home and a nearby tree on Whitaker Street. The bolt that struck the home damaged the electrical equipment inside. The bolt that struck the tree caused the tree to split in two, and one of the pieces fell through a window. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 25 Date Type Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description July 24, 2009 Hail 0/0 $15k A strong cold front moved through the region Friday morning and generated a line of strong to severe thunderstorms that affected areas from far east central Minnesota, into west central Wisconsin. Several reports of golf ball size hail were observed in the east metro of the Twin Cities. September 21, 2010 Hail 0/0 $5M Several reports of large hail, up to the size of half dollars, occurred from the Highland Park area of Saint Paul, northeast across the north side of the city. August 25, 2013 Excessive Heat 0/216 None reported Heat indices of 105° F occurred during the Minnesota State Fair. 216 people were treated at State Fair medical aid stations for heat-related illnesses. Of those 216, 10 were transported to area hospitals. Minneapolis schools also canceled outdoor athletic practices during this period of extreme heat. July 2015 Extreme Heat 0/0 None reported Several observations across Ramsey County measured heat indices over 105° F for two days in a row. The highest heat index value was 116° F. 8 Significant Incidents - 1/216 $7,015,000 total claimed -- Sources: NCDC; 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.11.5 PROBABILITY Summer weather hazards are an annual occurrence and are likely to occur each year. Eight significant summer weather incidents have occurred since 1970, giving a probability of approximately a 14.5% chance of a significant summer weather incident occurring within any given year. 3.11.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change is expected to have dramatic impacts on weather patterns in Minnesota. These include more extreme weather patterns, including increased periods of extreme heat, enhanced lightning activity, changes in hail patterns and more intense storms. Climate change could have the following impacts: • Increased Extreme Heat: This includes more frequent and severe heatwaves, higher average summer temperatures, and longer duration of hot spells. Minnesota is getting warmer, especially winter nights in the northern parts of the state. Daily average minimum temperatures during winter (Dec-Feb) have increased 4.9 degrees in southern Minnesota. • Enhanced Lightning Activity: Increased atmospheric instability may lead to more thunderstorms, with higher temperatures and humidity levels contributing to more frequent lightning strikes. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 26 • Changes in Hail Patterns: There is the potential for increase in the size and frequency of hail due to more intense thunderstorms, as well as shifts in the geographic distribution of hailstorms. • More Intense Storms: Greater frequency of severe thunderstorms with high winds and heavy rainfall and subsequent increased risk of flash flooding. • Health Risks: Extreme heat can lead to increased heat-related illnesses and mortality and a higher risk of respiratory problems due to poor air quality. Higher temperatures can exacerbate air quality issues, leading to more smog and ground-level ozone. • Economic Costs: Rising temperatures create a greater demand for energy to cool homes and businesses, and there may be increased costs for repairing damage from severe weather incidents. Ecosystem impacts can have trickle down effects on related industries such as fishing and tourism. Likewise, agricultural impacts affect the agricultural and farming sectors. • Ecosystem Disruptions: Increased heat, along with more frequent, intense, and prolonged storms, may alter plant and animal behavior and distribution by stressing native species and ecosystems. Over the past 50 years, Minnesota lakes have lost an average of 10 to 14 days of ice cover, and July-August water temperatures have risen by 3.0 to 3.9°F, impacting lake and fish health. Algae blooms, exacerbated by warmer water, can deplete oxygen levels, suffocating fish, even those species like bass that typically thrive in warmer conditions. Northern tree species such as paper birch, quaking aspen, balsam fir, and black spruce may decline and migrate further north, while warmer-climate species like maples, oaks, and hickories could take their place. These shifts in tree cover will also lead to changes in wildlife and soil habitats. While the exact relationship between climate change and summer weather is complex and still under active research, the evidence suggests that climate change is likely to impact the frequency, intensity, and distribution of summer weather hazards in the Midwest. Improved understanding and modeling of these changes are essential for developing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies. 3.11.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.11.7.1 People Extreme heat poses serious health risks, particularly for the elderly, children, and those with pre-existing health conditions, as well as people without access to air conditioning. Extreme heat is the leading weather-related killer in the United States, killing more people than other types of extreme weather. Changing temperatures bring illnesses related to frequency and severity of allergic illnesses (e.g., asthma and hay fever). Prolonged heatwaves can lead to heat exhaustion, heatstroke, and increased mortality rates. During the second planning meeting, attendees noted that in Ramsey County, many of the recent immigrants are not used to hotter weather and often live many people to a home, often without air conditioning. Hailstorms, often accompanying severe thunderstorms, can cause significant injury to individuals caught outside and disrupt daily activities. Lightning presents another serious threat, with the potential to cause direct injuries or fatalities and ignite fires, posing additional risks to both urban and rural communities. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 27 3.11.7.2 Property Extreme heat can cause asphalt and concrete to buckle, strain power grids due to increased air conditioning usage, and degrade building materials, leading to higher maintenance and repair costs. Hailstorms pose a significant threat to homes, vehicles, and agricultural assets, often resulting in shattered windows, damaged roofs, and destroyed crops. These storms can also disrupt transportation networks and necessitate costly repairs. Lightning strikes can cause power outages, fires, and severe damage to electrical and communication systems. 3.11.7.3 Environment The environment in the Midwest is particularly vulnerable to summer weather hazards such as extreme heat, hail, and lightning. Extreme heat can lead to drought conditions, stressing water resources, and reducing soil moisture, which negatively impacts plant and animal life. Prolonged high temperatures can also alter ecosystems, driving some species to migrate while threatening others that cannot adapt quickly enough. Hailstorms can cause significant physical damage to vegetation, strip leaves from trees, and destroy crops, disrupting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Lightning, besides posing a direct threat to wildlife, can ignite wildfires, which rapidly spread and devastate large areas of forest and grassland, leading to habitat loss and long-term ecological shifts. These summer weather hazards collectively strain the resilience of the Midwest's natural environment, disrupt the balance of local ecosystems, and contribute to biodiversity loss. 3.11.7.4 County and Community Operations Government and community operations in the Midwest are significantly vulnerable to summer weather hazards such as extreme heat, hail, and lightning. Extreme heat can overwhelm public health systems with heat-related illnesses and fatalities, strain energy resources due to increased air conditioning use, and disrupt daily operations in schools, government buildings, and public transportation. Hailstorms can cause extensive damage to public infrastructure necessitating costly repairs and diverting funds from other essential services. Lightning can disrupt power and communication networks, leading to outages that hinder emergency response efforts and critical services. These disruptions can impede the delivery of essential services, compromise public safety, and place a significant financial burden on local governments. The number of languages spoken in the county makes public messaging difficult. 3.11.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Increased risk of heat-related illnesses and fatalities, especially among vulnerable populations (elderly, children, and those with pre-existing health conditions). • Potential overburdening of healthcare facilities due to heat-related emergencies. • Disruption of daily activities and potential evacuation of individuals from areas without adequate cooling facilities. • Extreme heat creates heat-related physical stress on the population and is exacerbated in the metropolitan areas where greater amounts of heat-absorbing surfaces (e.g., asphalt and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 28 concrete) trap heat and emit higher temperatures throughout the night. Injuries from hailstones or lightning, particularly if individuals are caught outdoors. • Damage to personal vehicles and homes leading to financial strain on households. • Risk of lightning strikes causing injuries or fatalities to individuals outdoors. • Potential for lightning-induced fires affecting residential areas and leading to evacuations. Impact on Responders • Increased risk of heat exhaustion, heatstroke, and hail or lightning strikes among emergency responders. • Need for additional resources and protocols to ensure responder safety in high temperatures. Impact on Continuity of Operations • Potential for power outages due to increased demand for electricity (air conditioning). • Need for implementation of heat emergency plans and continuity strategies. • Possible damage to government buildings, vehicles, and communication systems. • Disruption of essential services and potential delays in government response and recovery efforts. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Strain on power grids and potential infrastructure failures due to high heat. • Significant damage to buildings, vehicles, and outdoor infrastructure (e.g., traffic signals, power lines) duet to hail or lightning. • Damage to electrical systems, communication networks, and buildings due to lightning. Impact on the Environment • Stress on local ecosystems and wildlife, particularly aquatic systems due to higher water temperatures. • Damage to crops and natural vegetation due to hail. • Forest and grass fires due leading to habitat destruction and air quality issues due to lightning. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Potential impacts on agriculture and tourism sectors. • Potential disruptions to businesses, leading to loss of revenue and jobs. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Public dissatisfaction if government response is perceived as inadequate, particularly in providing cooling centers and emergency services. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 29 3.12 Tornado and Windstorm 3.12.1 PROFILE High winds can be produced during severe thunderstorms, with other strong weather systems, or by flow down a mountain. There are several types of damaging winds possible in Minnesota: • Straight-line winds describe any thunderstorm wind that is not associated with rotation and is used mainly to differentiate from tornadic winds.  A downdraft is a small-scale column of air that rapidly sinks toward the ground.  A downburst is the general term used to broadly describe macro and microbursts. Downburst is the general term for all localized strong wind events that are caused by a strong downdraft within a thunderstorm, while microburst simply refers to an especially small downburst that is less than 4 km across.  A gust front is the leading edge of rain-cooled air that clashes with warmer thunderstorm inflow. Gust fronts are characterized by a wind shift, temperature drop, and gusty winds out ahead of a thunderstorm. Sometimes the winds push up air above them, forming a shelf cloud or detached roll cloud.  A derecho is a widespread, long-lived windstorm that is associated with a band of rapidly moving showers or thunderstorms. A typical derecho consists of numerous microbursts, downbursts, and downburst clusters. By definition, if the wind damage swath extends more than 240 miles (about 400 kilometers) and includes wind gusts of at least 58 mph (93 km/h) or greater along most of its length, then the event may be classified as a derecho.  A haboob is a wall of dust that is pushed out along the ground from a thunderstorm downdraft at high speeds. • Tornadoes are defined as violently rotating columns of air extending from thunderstorms to the ground, with wind speeds between 40-300 mph. They develop under 3 scenarios: (1) along a squall line; (2) in connection with thunderstorm squall lines during hot, humid weather; and (3) in the outer portion of a tropical cyclone. Funnel clouds are rotating columns of air not in contact with the ground; however, the column of air can reach the ground very quickly and become a tornado. 3.12.2 LOCATION All communities within Ramsey County are vulnerable to windstorms and tornadoes. Minnesota lies along the northern border of Tornado Alley, a loosely defined area first described in 1952 in the central United States where tornadoes are more likely to occur than in other parts of the continent. Interestingly, tornado activity has been shifting away from the Great Plains and toward the Midwestern and Southeast U.S. according to a report published in the April 2024 issue of the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 30 Figure 13. Tornado Alley Source: Encyclopedia Britannica 3.12.3 EXTENT Winds are classified by the NWS using the categories shown in Table 20. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 31 Table 20. Wind Speed Classifications Description Speed Strong Wind Gusts Between 39 mph and 57 mph Damaging Wind Gusts Between 58 mph and 74 mph causing minor damage Very Damaging Wind Gusts Between 75 mph and 91 mph causing moderate damage Violent Wind Gusts Greater than 92 mph causing major damage Source: National Weather Service Since 2007, tornado strength in the United States has been ranked based on the Enhanced Fujita scale (EF scale), replacing the Fujita scale introduced in 1971. The EF scale, shown in Table 21 uses similar principles to the Fujita scale, with 6 categories from 0-5, based on wind estimates and damage caused by the tornado. The EF Scale is used extensively by the NWS in investigating tornadoes (all tornadoes are now assigned an EF Scale number), and by engineers in correlating damage to buildings and techniques with different wind speeds caused by tornadoes. It uses three-second gusts estimated at the point of damage based on a judgment of damage. When tornado-related damage is surveyed, it is compared to a list of Damage Indicators (DIs) and Degrees of Damage (DoD) which help estimate better the range of wind speeds the tornado likely produced. Each damage indicator is rated on a scale of 1-8 DoD. From that, a rating (from EF0 to EF5) is assigned. Table 21. Enhance Fujita Scale EF Rating 3 Second Gust (mph) Description 0 65-85 Light damage. Some damage to chimneys; branches broken off trees; shallow-rooted trees pushed over; sign boards damaged. 1 86-110 Moderate damage. Peels surface off roofs; mobile homes pushed off foundations or overturned; moving autos blown off roads. 2 111-135 Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; boxcars overturned; large trees snapped or uprooted; light-object missiles generated; cars lifted off ground. 3 136-165 Severe damage. Roofs and some walls torn off well- constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees in forest uprooted; heavy cars lifted off the ground and thrown. 4 166-200 Devastating damage. Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with weak foundations blown away some distance; cars thrown, and large missiles generated. 5 200+ Incredible damage. Strong frame houses leveled off foundations and swept away; automobile-sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 meters (109 yds); trees debarked; incredible phenomena will occur. Source: National Weather Service Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 32 3.12.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a significant history of damaging windstorms and tornadoes. The NCEI Storm Events Database was consulted for incident records. 3.12.4.1 Windstorm History According to NCEI records, there have been 168 significant non-tornadic windstorm incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024, with wind speeds of up to 99 mph. These winds can inflict damage to buildings and in some cases, overturn high-profile vehicles. This dataset recorded zero deaths, 11 injuries, and over $25 million in property damage since 1950. Notable non-tornadic windstorm incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 22. Table 22. Notable Non-Tornadic Windstorm Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Location Magnitude (mph) Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description April 26, 1984 u/k u/k 0/6 u/k -- May 1998 Saint Paul 100 0/0 $48M A derecho damaged 2,000 homes and fell thousands of trees. May 9, 2004 Saint Paul 72 0/0 $330k Many reports of tree and structure damages. September 21, 2005 Countywide 75 0/1 $25M Many homes were destroyed by falling trees, and the roof of a mobile home in Mounds View was blown off. Roads were blocked throughout the county. August 2007 Saint Paul 69 0/1 One home was destroyed when a tree fell on it, and one man was injured by a window crashing in on him. Part of the grandstand’s roof at the State Fair was blown off, and dozens of vendor booths were damaged. XCEL Energy reported 250,000 outages in the metro region. June 10, 2012 Saint Paul 70 0/0 $50k Blew down a large swath of trees from the Highland Park area toward Randolph Avenue. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 33 Date Location Magnitude (mph) Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description November 10, 2012 Saint Paul 64 0/0 $50k Most of the damage was the result of trees landing on cars, houses and sheds. July 5, 2016 Lauderdale 60 0/0 $25k 138,000 people were without power during the storm. June 11, 2017 Saint Paul 58 0/2 u/k -- August 2, 2022 Little Canada, Saint Paul, Vadnais Heights 60 0/0 $30k -- 10 Significant Incidents -- -- 0/10 $73,485,000 total claimed -- Sources: NCEI; 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.12.4.2 Tornado History According to NCEI records, eight tornadoes were reported in Ramsey County between 1950 and July 2024, causing one death, 168 injuries, and over $151 million in reported property damage. Tornado classification ranged from F0/EF0 to F4. Notable tornadic incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 23. Table 23. Notable Tornadic Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Location Magnitude Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description May 6, 1965 u/k F4 0/108 $25M Part of one of the worst tornado outbreaks in Minnesota history. Six tornadoes affected six counties around the Twin Cities with 13 fatalities and over 500 injured. June 28, 1979 u/k F1 0/0 $250k Part of another large outbreak of 16 tornadoes. June 14, 1981 Roseville F3 1/60 $25M The Lt. Governor activated 120 National Guard military police to prevent the looting of damaged businesses and homes. April 26, 1984 St. Anthony F3 1/53 $25M Four churches and a mall were among the damages. May 15, 1998 Roseville F1 0/0 $150M Seven houses were destroyed, and 102 severely damaged. Along with the tornado there was widespread hail. May 22, Mounds EF-0 0/0 $20k Most of the damage was due to Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 34 2011 View sporadic trees being blown down. July 18, 2015 Shoreview (North Oaks) EF-0 0/0 $500k The highest numbers of toppled and snapped trees occurred at Deep Lake. Some trees fell on houses, vehicles, and other structures. August 27, 2022 Saint Paul EF-0 0/0 $150k Several homes had damage (mainly roof damage) which occurred as multiple large trees were either uprooted or blown down along the tornado's path. The maximum width was 100 yards with a peak wind of 75 mph. Sources: NCDC; 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.12.5 PROBABILITY Windstorms are an annual occurrence and are likely to occur each year. Seven significant tornadoes have occurred since 1970, giving a probability of approximately a 13% chance of a significant tornado occurring within any given year. 3.12.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS While the exact relationship between climate change and tornadoes is complex and still under active research, the evidence suggests that climate change is likely to impact the frequency, intensity, and distribution of severe windstorms and tornadoes in the Midwest. 3.12.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.12.7.1 People All individuals who live, work, and recreate within Ramsey County are at risk of impact from windstorms and tornadoes. The most likely impacts are from electrical outages (which affects heating/cooling, food storage, communications, and use of durable medical equipment), although individuals may also suffer transportation disruptions from downed trees, medical conditions from debris cleanup, auto accidents, and injuries or fatalities from downed trees or blown objects. Taking cover during inclement weather reduces many of these impacts. 3.12.7.2 Property In "strong wind" conditions, small branches break off trees, and loose objects are blown about. Isolated occurrences of wind damage to porches, carports, awnings, or pool enclosures may take place. Power outages are common, especially in winter months. In "damaging wind" conditions, wind damage occurs to unanchored mobile homes, porches, carports, awnings, and pool enclosures, with some shingles blown from roofs. Large branches break off trees, with weak or diseased trees blown down. Loose objects are easily blown about and can become dangerous projectiles. Power outages are likely to be more extensive. Other utility outages, such as Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 35 communication, may also occur. Damaging high winds are considered extremely dangerous for high- profile vehicles. In “very damaging” and “violent wind” conditions, including tornadic winds, a wide range of impacts on property may occur, depending on intensity, duration, and the vulnerability of the structures in their path. This may include but is not limited to, uplifting of roofs; severe damage up to the complete destruction of walls, windows, and doors; larger projectiles including vehicles; and widespread and long- lasting power outages. 3.12.7.3 Environment The environment is at high exposure to windstorms and tornadoes. Common types of environmental damage include severe damage to trees that can lead to habitat loss and soil erosion, wind erosion in agricultural areas leading to reduction of soil fertility and dust storms, wildlife displacement including the destruction of nesting sites, increased debris in water bodies leading to disruption of aquatic habitats, and the introduction of invasive species. 3.12.7.4 County and Community Operations Damaging windstorms and tornadic incidents can have significant impacts on County and community operations. Emergency services may be overwhelmed and communication, including 911, may be damaged leading to difficulties in coordinating response efforts. Utility and transportation infrastructure may be compromised, delaying assistance. Public health may also be impaired by disruptions to sanitation and crowded shelters. Public services may also be disrupted, including schools, libraries, parks, and community centers, affecting community resources and recreation. 3.12.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Significant risk of injuries and fatalities, especially for individuals caught in the path of tornadoes or in structures unable to withstand high winds. • Displacement of residents due to destroyed or severely damaged homes. • Mental health impacts, including trauma and stress, particularly among children and those who experience severe losses. Impact on Responders • High risk of injury or death for responders during rescue and recovery operations in hazardous conditions. • Strain on emergency services due to increased demand for rescue, medical, and logistical support. • Potential for responder fatigue and mental health challenges due to prolonged and intense operations. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 36 Impact on Continuity of Operations • Disruption of government operations due to damage to administrative buildings, communication networks, and essential infrastructure. • Potential delays in providing public services, impacting community support and recovery efforts. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Extensive damage or destruction of residential, commercial, and industrial buildings, including critical infrastructure, including power lines, water supply systems, and transportation networks. • High repair and reconstruction costs, leading to prolonged recovery periods. Impact on the Environment • Uprooting of trees and destruction of natural habitats, impacting local wildlife. • Potential for hazardous material spills from damaged industrial sites, contaminating soil and water sources. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Economic losses due to business closures, property damage, and interruption of commercial activities. • Significant financial burden on local government and residents for recovery and rebuilding efforts. • Potential decline in property values and loss of tax revenue. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Public scrutiny and potential dissatisfaction with the government's preparedness and response efforts. 3.13 Winter Weather Hazards 3.13.1 PROFILE According to the NWS, a winter weather event is “a winter weather phenomenon (such as snow, sleet, ice, wind chill) that impacts public safety, transportation, and/or commerce”. The most common types of winter weather phenomena experienced in Ramsey County are described below. • Blizzard: A dangerous winter storm that contains large amounts of snow or blowing snow, coupled with winds above 35mph and visibility less than a quarter of a mile. • Extreme cold: The NWS doesn't have a set definition for extreme cold, but instead calibrates the point at which forecasters warn residents based on the region's climate. In Ramsey County, the NWS issues “extreme cold” warnings when it feels like -25° F or colder across a wide area for several hours. • Ice storm: A storm that deposits at least .25” of ice on exposed surfaces. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 37 Note that a single winter weather incident may include one or more of these, or other, winter phenomena. 3.13.2 LOCATION All communities within Ramsey County are vulnerable to winter weather. 3.13.3 EXTENT Winter weather is typically forecasted three to seven days in advance by the NWS and can lead to the issuance of a winter weather watch, warning, or advisory in a Hazardous Weather Outlook bulletin. There are several types of these notices depending on conditions. Forecast certainty increases as the time for storm onset decreases. 3.13.3.1 Winter Weather Watch A watch is issued 24 to 72 hours in advance when there is a 50 to 80% chance of hazardous winter weather meeting warning thresholds. It aims to give enough lead time for people to prepare and take necessary actions. Table 24. Winter Weather Watch Types Watch Type Description Winter Storm Watch Conditions are favorable for a winter storm event (heavy sleet, heavy snow, ice storm, heavy snow and blowing snow or a combination of events) to meet or exceed local winter storm warning criteria in the next 24 to 72 hours. Criteria for snow is 7 inches or more in 12 hours or less; or 9 inches or more in 24 hours covering at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Use "mid-point" of snowfall range to trigger a watch (i.e. 5 to 8 inches of snow = watch). Criteria for ice is 1/2 inch or more over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. This includes lake-effect snow. Wind Chill Watch Conditions are favorable for wind chill temperatures to meet or exceed local wind chill warning criteria in the next 24 to 72 hours. Wind chill temperatures may reach or exceed - 25°F. Source: National Weather Service 3.13.3.2 Winter Weather Warning These products are issued when hazardous winter weather is occurring, imminent, or highly likely (over 80% probability). A warning indicates conditions that threaten life or property. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 38 Table 25. Winter Weather Warning Types Warning Type Description Blizzard Warning Blizzard event is imminent or expected in the next 12 to 36 hours. Sustained wind or frequent gusts greater than or equal to 35 mph will accompany falling and/or blowing snow to frequently reduce visibility to less than 1/4 mile for three or more hours. Ice Storm Warning An ice storm event is expected to meet or exceed local ice storm warning criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Criteria for ice is 1/2 inch or more over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Winter Storm Warning A winter storm event (heavy sleet, heavy snow, ice storm, heavy snow and blowing snow or a combination of events) is expected to meet or exceed local winter storm warning criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Criteria for snow is 7 inches or more in 12 hours or less; or 9 inches or more in 24 hours covering at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Use "mid-point" of snowfall range to trigger warning (i.e 5 to 8 inches of snow = warning). Criteria for ice is 1/2 inch or more over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Wind Chill Warning Wind chill temperatures are expected to meet or exceed local wind chill warning criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Wind chill temperatures may reach or exceed -25°F. Source: www.weather.gov 3.13.3.3 Winter Weather Advisory These products are issued when hazardous winter weather is occurring, imminent, or highly likely (over 80% probability). An advisory is for less serious conditions that cause significant inconvenience and could become life-threatening if caution is not exercised. Table 26. Winter Weather Advisory Types Advisory Type Description Winter Weather Advisory A winter storm event (sleet, snow, freezing rain, snow and blowing snow, or a combination of events) is expected to meet or exceed local winter weather advisory criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours but stay below warning criteria. Criteria for snow is 4 inches or more in 12 hours or less covering at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Use "mid-point" of snowfall range to trigger advisory (i.e 2 to 5 inches of snow = advisory). Criteria for ice is any ice accumulation less than 1/2 inch over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Winter Weather Advisory can also be issued for black ice. This is optional. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 39 Wind Chill Advisory Wind chill temperatures are expected to meet or exceed local wind chill advisory criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Wind chill temperatures may reach or exceed -15°F. Source: www.weather.gov 3.13.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a significant history of damaging windstorms and tornadoes. The NCEI Storm Events Database was consulted for incident records. According to NCEI records, there have been 109 significant winter weather incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024. This dataset recorded five deaths and two injuries since 1950. Notable winter weather incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 27. Table 27. Notable Winter Weather Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Type Deaths/ Injuries Description January 17, 1996 Ice storm 0/0 Up to 1" of ice accumulated over much of the Minneapolis/Saint Paul region, resulting in significant tree damage and power outages. More than 180,000 metro residents were without power, and 5 Red Cross shelters were open to assist people who were forced from their homes due to lack of heat. February 2, 1996 Extreme cold/ wind chill 0/0 A new record low temperature for Minnesota was set in the town of Tower at -60° F. Numerous record low temperatures were set during the period at St. Cloud, Rochester and the Twin Cities. Minneapolis/Saint Paul set 3 new record low temperatures as well as recording the 2nd coldest day on record. A mean temperature of -25° F was measured that day with a high of -17° F and a low of -32° F in the Twin Cities. This was within 2 degrees of tying the all-time record low temperature set in the Twin Cities and the coldest temperature recorded this century. Many central and southern Minnesota locations set new record low temperatures. The Governor closed all schools that day. January 12, 2000 Heavy snow 0/0 9" of snow fell at the Twin Cities International Airport, and the Minnesota Highway Patrol responded to over 325 crashes in the Twin Cities – however, most were minor without injuries. January 19, 2001 Heavy snow 0/0 8" of snow was recorded at the Twin Cities International Airport. January 15, 2005 Cold/ wind chill 1/0 A disabled woman was found dead of exposure outside of Como Park Conservatory. The low temperature during the night that she was missing was 9 degrees below zero. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 40 Date Type Deaths/ Injuries Description January 15, 2009 Cold / wind chill 2/0 Wind chill fell below -35° F. December 10, 2010 Winter storm 0/0 This was the biggest snowstorm since the Halloween Blizzard of 1991, and the average snowfall in Ramsey County was 18". February 20, 2011 Winter storm 0/0 Lightning was observed by several people, amidst a storm that brought 12-16" of snow. December 31, 2011 Winter weather 0/0 Heavy, wet snow fell during the holiday, resulting in numerous accidents across the county. December 9, 2012 Winter storm 0/0 12-16" of snow were reported across the county. January 2014 Extreme cold/ wind chill 0/0 Wind chill values dropped below -35° F for several hours, during a prolonged period of cold. Propane supplies in the region became very low, leading to the Governor declaring a Peacetime State of Emergency. Earlier in the month the Governor canceled all public-school classes in the state due to extreme wind chills. It was the first such closing in 17 years. February 2, 2016 Winter storm 0/0 10-13" of snow fell, resulting in 175 flights canceled or delayed at the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport. December 12, 2016 Extreme cold/ wind chill 1/1 A woman froze to death in Saint Paul, outside of her apartment building when the wind chill dropped to - 19° F. January 1, 2018 Extreme cold/ wind chill 1/1 A man was found in Saint Paul who had died from exposure. January 22, 2018 Winter storm 0/0 8-12" of snow fell across the county. April 13, 2018 Winter storm 0/0 Multiple waves of winter precipitation occurred, including sleet and snow, resulted in total snowfall amounts of 16-20". 16 Significant Incidents -- 5/2 -- Sources: NCEI and 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.13.5 PROBABILITY Winter storms affect Ramsey County each year, so there is a nearly 100% probability of winter weather in a single year. Extreme cold temperatures also affect the county nearly every year. The amount of snow and ice, the number of blizzards, and days of sub-zero temperatures each year are unpredictable. 3.13.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change may affect winter storms in the Midwest United States in several ways: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 41 • Temperature Fluctuations: Temperature fluctuations are increasingly causing cycles of melting and refreezing, which heightens the risk of ice storms and hazardous driving conditions. In Minnesota, most of the observed warming has occurred during the coldest periods. Since records began in January 1895, average daily low temperatures have increased at more than twice the rate of high temperatures. The winter season (December through February) has warmed 2-3 times faster than summer (June through August). This winter warming has accelerated in recent decades. From 1970 to 2021, average daily winter low temperatures rose over 15 times faster than summer high temperatures. The frequency of extreme cold temperatures, such as -35°F in northern Minnesota and -25°F in the southern region, has decreased by up to 90%. While Minnesota will continue to experience periodic severe cold spells, the long-term decline in extreme cold is almost certain to persist. • Increased Intensity: Warmer temperatures can lead to more moisture in the atmosphere, potentially resulting in heavier snowfall and more intense winter storms. • Frequency of Extreme Events: While overall winter precipitation might decrease in some areas, the frequency of extreme winter weather events could increase. • Shift in Snowfall Patterns: Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns could shift where and when snow falls, affecting traditional snowfall regions and potentially leading to unexpected snowstorms in areas that usually receive less snow. • More Rain than Snow: Warmer winter temperatures might lead to more winter precipitation falling as rain rather than snow, increasing the risk of flooding and reducing snowpack. • Prolonged Storm Duration: Changes in atmospheric circulation patterns could lead to slower- moving storms, resulting in longer-lasting and potentially more damaging winter weather events. • Changes in Storm Tracks: Alterations in the jet stream and other atmospheric patterns may change the paths that winter storms take, affecting which areas are most impacted. • Increased Energy Costs: More intense and frequent storms could lead to higher energy demands for heating and storm response, impacting infrastructure and increasing costs for residents. • Public Health Impacts: Greater variability and intensity in winter storms can lead to increased risks to public health, such as hypothermia, frostbite, and accidents related to icy conditions. While the exact relationship between climate change and tornadoes is complex and still under active research, the evidence suggests that climate change is likely to impact the frequency, intensity, and distribution of winter weather in the Midwest. Improved understanding and modeling of these changes are essential for developing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies. 3.13.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.13.7.1 People Blizzards can cause whiteout conditions, making travel dangerous and leading to numerous accidents. They can also disrupt transportation and supply chains, leaving people stranded and unable to access Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 42 essential services. Extreme cold poses serious health risks such as hypothermia and frostbite, particularly for the elderly, young children, and those without adequate heating. Unhoused individuals and those living in poorly insulated homes are especially at risk. Ice storms create hazardous conditions by coating roads, power lines, and trees with ice, often resulting in widespread power outages and dangerous driving conditions. The loss of power can leave people without heat, light, and communication, exacerbating the risks, especially for those dependent on electricity for medical devices. Additionally, ice can make walkways treacherous, increasing the risk of falls. 3.13.7.2 Property Blizzards can lead to significant snow accumulation, causing roofs to collapse under the weight. Extreme cold can cause pipes to freeze and burst, resulting in extensive water damage and costly repairs for homes and businesses. It can also strain heating systems, leading to potential failures during peak demand periods. Ice storms are particularly damaging as they coat power lines, trees, and structures with a heavy layer of ice. This can cause trees to fall and power lines to snap, leading to widespread power outages that may take days or even weeks to repair. The combined effects of these winter weather events pose significant challenges to maintaining the safety and functionality of property and infrastructure. 3.13.7.3 Environment Winter weather can alter habitats and potentially disrupt the food sources and migratory patterns of wildlife. Heavy snow cover and ice accumulation can damage vegetation, particularly trees and shrubs that are not adapted to withstand such weight, leading to long-term ecological impacts. Extreme cold spells can be detrimental to both flora and fauna, with prolonged exposure to freezing temperatures causing frost damage to plants and endangering animals that lack sufficient shelter or are unable to find adequate food. Additionally, ice buildup on rivers and lakes can impact aquatic ecosystems by altering water flow and potentially causing fish kills due to reduced oxygen levels. The cumulative effect of these winter weather events can lead to significant disruptions in the natural environment, affecting biodiversity and the overall health of ecosystems. 3.13.7.4 County and Community Operations Government and community operations can be greatly impacted by winter weather. Blizzards and ice storms can cripple transportation systems, making roads impassable and hindering the movement of emergency vehicles, public transportation, and supply chains. Extreme cold can strain public infrastructure, leading to increased demand for heating and energy, which can overwhelm utilities and cause power outages. Ice storms are particularly devastating as they can lead to widespread power outages by bringing down power lines and damaging infrastructure. The result of any of these can halt government operations, disrupt communication networks, and impede the delivery of critical services. Additionally, the cleanup and repair efforts following such events can place a significant financial burden on local governments and communities, diverting resources from other important projects and services. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 43 3.13.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Risk of injuries and fatalities due to exposure, traffic accidents, and falls on icy surfaces, and exacerbation of existing health conditions, such as cardiovascular and respiratory issues. • Isolation due to impassable roads, leading to shortages of food, water, and medical supplies. • Increased demand on healthcare facilities due to weather-related injuries and illnesses. • Power outages caused by ice accumulation on power lines and trees, leading to heating issues and potential carbon monoxide poisoning from alternative heating sources. Impact on Responders • Difficult and hazardous conditions for emergency responders, increasing the risk of injuries during response efforts. • Delayed response times due to impassable roads and treacherous conditions. • Increased demand for emergency services, leading to responder fatigue and resource depletion. Continuity of Operations • Disruption of government operations due to office closures and staff inability to commute. • Strain on infrastructure, such as heating systems and power grids, impacting the ability to maintain essential services. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Structural damage to buildings and homes due to heavy snow loads and wind. • Risk of burst pipes and water damage in homes and public facilities. • Increased wear and tear on heating systems, potentially leading to failures and costly repairs. • Damage to power lines, trees, and structures from ice accumulation. Impact on the Environment • Potential for water contamination from road salt and chemical de-icers. • Damage to trees and vegetation from heavy snow and ice accumulation. • Stress on local wildlife and ecosystems, particularly aquatic systems that may freeze over. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Economic losses from business closures, supply chain disruptions, and increased costs for snow and ice removal. • Increased energy costs for heating, impacting household budgets and business operations. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 44 • Public dissatisfaction if government response is perceived as inadequate or slow, particularly in terms of snow and ice removal, power restoration, and emergency services. • Potential erosion of trust if communication is not clear, timely, and effective during and after the event. 3.14 Human-Caused Hazards 3.14.1 PROFILE Many human-caused hazards may affect Ramsey County. These include, but are not limited to: • Active shooter/hostile incident: A situation in which one or more individuals are actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area, typically using firearms. These incidents are characterized by their unpredictability and rapid evolution, often involving multiple victims and posing significant threats to public safety. • Civil Unrest: A situation in which one or more individuals are actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area, typically using firearms. These incidents are characterized by their unpredictability and rapid evolution, often involving multiple victims and posing significant threats to public safety. • Cyberattack: A deliberate and malicious attempt by an individual or group to breach the information systems of another individual, organization, or government. These attacks aim to steal, alter, or destroy data, disrupt operations, or cause harm in various other ways. Cyberattacks can take many forms, including malware, phishing, Denial-of-Service (DoS), ransomware, Man-in-the-Middle (MitM), SQL injection, and zero-day exploits. Cyberattacks can cause significant financial, operational, and reputational damage. • Terrorism: The unlawful use of violence or threats of violence, especially against civilians, to create fear and achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives. Terrorism can be perpetrated by individuals, groups, or state-sponsored actors and often aims to influence an audience beyond the immediate victims. Examples of terrorism include bombings, shootings, hijackings, kidnappings, and cyberattacks that are intended to cause widespread disruption or fear. Although not natural hazards, these hazards have been included to address and reduce the risks they pose to public safety, infrastructure, and essential services. 3.14.2 LOCATION Active shooter events are most likely to take place in locations with high concentrations of people, such as schools, workplaces, shopping centers, places of worship, and public events. These settings are often targeted due to the presence of numerous potential victims and the ability to create widespread fear and disruption. Civil unrest is most likely to take place in urban areas and locations where large groups of people can gather, such as city centers, public squares, government buildings, and university campuses. These areas Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 45 are often chosen for protests and demonstrations due to their visibility, accessibility, and symbolic significance. Cyberattacks are most likely to target critical infrastructure, financial institutions, government agencies, healthcare systems, large corporations, and any organizations that handle sensitive or valuable data. Additionally, cyberattacks can affect individual users through personal devices, social media accounts, and online services. These targets are chosen due to the potential for significant disruption, financial gain, or access to sensitive information. Terrorism is most likely to take place in high-profile public spaces, government buildings, transportation hubs, tourist attractions, and large gatherings or events such as concerts, festivals, or sports arenas. These locations are targeted for their potential to cause maximum casualties, widespread fear, and significant media attention. 3.14.3 EXTENT The extent of a human-caused hazard can be defined by several key factors: • Geographic Scope: The specific geographical area affected by the hazard, which could range from a single location (e.g., a building or city block) to a broader region or even global impact in the case of cyberattacks. • Intensity and severity: The level of violence, disruption, or damage caused by the hazard, including casualties, injuries, property damage, and economic impact. • Duration: The period over which the hazard persists, from the initial incident to the resolution or containment by authorities. • Psychological and social impact: The emotional and psychological effects on individuals and communities, including fear, trauma, and social unrest. • Response and recovery efforts: The effectiveness and timeliness of emergency response, law enforcement actions, and recovery efforts to mitigate the hazard's effects and restore normalcy. • Broader implications: The potential for the hazard to impact societal norms, public policy, international relations, and the overall sense of security and resilience within affected communities. Defining the extent of a human-caused hazard involves assessing these dimensions to understand its full impact and implications for preparedness, response, and mitigation efforts. 3.14.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has several notable human-caused hazard incidents in its history. News archives and local government agencies were consulted to obtain this information. According to these records and accounts, there have been at least 5 significant human-caused hazard incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024. This dataset recorded at least 3 deaths and an indeterminable number injuries since 1950; at least $354M in damages were recorded from these incidents. Notable incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 28. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 46 Table 28. Notable Human-Caused Hazard Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Type Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage Description July 20, 1967 Civil unrest 0/24 $4.2M In response to a pre-meditated plot by Black Panther leader Stokely Carmichael. Widespread violence, including rock and bottle-throwing at law enforcement and fires set to businesses along Plymouth Avenue, quickly engulfed the area and lasted three days. April 4, 1968 Civil unrest – Active shooter 1/0 u/k Following the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, a wave of protesters marched in the streets but remained non-violent. One individual, stating anger at King’s death, vowed to avenge it by killing the first white man he saw and did so using a .45 caliber weapon. September 1, 2008 Civil unrest 0/0 u/k In a crowd of 10,000 protesters at the Republican National Convention, a group of approximately 300 turned to civil unrest and broke windows, slashed tires, and harassed delegates. Arrests led to the discovery of additional weapons including Maltov cocktails. May 26, 2020 Civil unrest 2/0 $350M In response to the death of George Floyd, public outrage developed into the second-most destructive period of civil unrest in U.S. history, after the 1992 Los Angeles riots. December 2, 2020 Cyber attack 0/0 None reported A vendor that provides technology services to Ramsey County advised the county that its security had been breached by a hacker seeking to extort payment through a ransomware scheme. Information of up to 8,700 clients of the Family Health Division may have been compromised. July 19, 2024 Cyber outage 0/0 None reported A technical problem of global cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike caused software failures across the country, including Ramsey County. Of most significance, hospitals and airports were impacted, disrupting operations. 3.14.5 PROBABILITY Human-caused hazards are relatively rare compared to other hazards but have the potential for significant impacts. 3.14.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change may influence human-caused hazards in several ways: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 47 • Incident catalyst: Protests and incidents may be caused be a person or persons concerned about the future impacts of climate change. • Resource scarcity: Climate change can exacerbate competition for resources such as water and food, potentially leading to social unrest and conflicts that could escalate into human-caused hazards like civil unrest or terrorism. • Migration and displacement: Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and other climate- related factors can force populations to migrate or become displaced. Displaced populations may face social, economic, and political challenges that contribute to instability and increase the likelihood of human-caused hazards. • Infrastructure vulnerability: Climate change can increase the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to damage from extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, floods, or wildfires. This damage can disrupt essential services and create conditions that are conducive to human- caused hazards. • Changing patterns of disease: Climate change can alter the geographic distribution and prevalence of diseases, potentially leading to public health crises that strain healthcare systems and social stability, contributing to human-caused hazards. While climate change itself is not a direct cause of human-caused hazards, its complex interactions with socio-economic and environmental factors can create conditions that increase the likelihood or severity of such hazards. 3.14.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.14.7.1 People Children and youth may lack the awareness, experience, or physical capabilities to respond effectively during emergencies such as active shooter incidents or civil unrest. They are also at increased risk of physical injury, psychological trauma, disrupted education, and long-term emotional effects due to exposure to violence or dangerous situations. Elderly individuals and those with disabilities may have limited mobility, sensory impairments, or chronic health conditions that hinder their ability to evacuate or seek safety during emergencies. This population also has a higher likelihood of physical harm, exacerbation of existing health conditions, and increased dependency on caregivers or emergency services during and after human-caused hazards. Minority and immigrant communities may face an increased risk of being targeted in hate crimes, limited access to timely and accurate information, and challenges in accessing support services or legal protection. 3.14.7.2 Property Critical infrastructure such as power plants, water treatment facilities, transportation hubs (airports, train stations), and communication networks essential for societal functioning may be targeted as disruption to these systems can have cascading effects on public safety, health, and economic stability. Government buildings such as courthouses, legislative centers, and civic centers represent symbols of authority, governance, and democracy and attacks on these can lead to physical damage, loss of critical records, disruption of government services, and psychological impact on the community and workforce. Locations where large numbers of people gather, such as stadiums, concert halls, shopping malls, and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 48 cultural venues are also vulnerable as a result of those seeking maximum casualties and media attention. 3.14.7.3 Environment The environment tends to be less vulnerable to human-caused hazards than natural hazards, but terrorist activities, particularly those involving sabotage or arson, can target natural resources such as forests, wildlife reserves, and water bodies. Destruction of these resources can lead to ecological damage, loss of biodiversity, and long-term environmental degradation. Contamination from chemical attacks, biological agents, or radioactive materials can also have severe and long-lasting environmental consequences. 3.14.7.4 County and Community Operations Attacks on government facilities or critical infrastructure can disrupt essential services such as law enforcement, emergency response, public utilities, and healthcare systems. This can compromise public safety and hinder effective response to emergencies. They can also erode public trust in the government's ability to provide security and protect citizens, leading to increased fear, anxiety, and uncertainty. In addition, attacks on economic targets or disruptions to business operations can lead to financial losses, reduced investor confidence, and economic instability within the community. Lastly, human-caused hazard incidents can create fear, trauma, and social unrest within communities, impacting mental health, social cohesion, and community resilience. 3.14.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Risk of injuries and fatalities among civilians caught in the incident. Risk of mass casualties and widespread injuries. • Psychological trauma and long-term mental health issues for survivors and witnesses. • Increased fear and anxiety within the community, potentially leading to changes in daily behavior and routines. • Heightened community tensions and divisions, potentially leading to long-term social unrest. • Personal data breaches, leading to identity theft and financial losses. • Disruption of access to essential online services, impacting communication, banking, and healthcare. • Increased anxiety and mistrust regarding digital security and privacy. Impact on Responders • High-risk conditions for law enforcement and emergency medical responders, with potential for responder injuries and fatalities. • Psychological impact on responders, including stress and trauma from witnessing or experiencing violence. • Strain on resources and personnel, leading to fatigue and reduced effectiveness over time. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 49 • Negative public perception and backlash against responders. Impact on Continuity of Operations • Immediate disruption of operations in affected areas, including lockdowns and evacuations. • Disruption of government operations and essential services, especially if including government operations, healthcare, banking, and utilities are targeted. • Long-term impacts on service delivery due to damaged infrastructure and ongoing security concerns. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Significant risk of property damage, including vandalism, arson, looting, explosions, fires, or other destructive methods. • Damage to digital infrastructure, including servers, networks, and databases. • High repair and replacement costs for damaged infrastructure and facilities and strengthening of cybersecurity measures. Impact on the Environment • Damage from fires, chemical spills, or other destructive actions. • Long-term impacts from contamination, structural damage, and delayed environmental remediation. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Economic losses from business closures, decreased tourism, and reduced consumer confidence. • Costs associated with increased security measures and mental health support services. • Long-term impacts on economic growth and stability due to ongoing social tensions and security concerns. • Economic losses from disrupted business operations, data breaches, and decreased consumer confidence in digital services. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Erosion of public trust if response is perceived as inadequate or slow. • Increased public dissatisfaction and mistrust in government if response is perceived as heavy- handed or ineffective. • Erosion of public trust in digital services and government cybersecurity measures. • Erosion of confidence in government’s ability to ensure safety and security. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 50 3.15 Infrastructure Failure 3.15.1 PROFILE Infrastructure failure encompasses a range of events that disrupt the normal functioning of essential systems and services in the community, and can have widespread and severe consequences for communities, economies, and the environment. Failures may include: • Transportation Accidents: These are incidents that disrupt the transportation system, such as vehicle collisions, train derailments, or aircraft crashes, which can lead to significant delays, injuries, or fatalities. • Electrical/Fuel Shortages: These occur when the supply of electricity or fuel is insufficient to meet demand, often due to infrastructure damage, supply chain issues, or increased consumption. This can result in power outages and hinder transportation and other critical services. • Supply Chain Disruption: This refers to interruptions in the flow of goods and services, which can be caused by natural disasters, manufacturing problems, or transportation failures. Such disruptions can lead to shortages of essential items and economic losses. • Water Contamination: This involves the pollution of water supplies with harmful substances, which can occur due to infrastructure breakdowns, such as leaks or breaches in containment systems. Contaminated water poses serious health risks and can affect a wide range of activities, from drinking water provision to agriculture. Although not natural hazards, these hazards have been included to address and reduce the risks they pose to public safety, infrastructure, and essential services. 3.15.2 LOCATION Infrastructure failures have significant impacts on a given community. Below are the likely locations for infrastructure failures within Ramsey County: Transportation • Roadways – Ramsey County is served by a number of major roadways including Interstates 94 (I- 94), 35E (I35E), and 694 (I-694); US Highways 52 and 61; and MN State Highways 36 (MN-36), 51 (MN-51), and 280 (MN-280). Additionally, there are a number of major county roads that transverse the region as well. • Intersections/Interchanges – Major intersections/interchanges in Ramsey County include I-94 and I-35E, I-94 and MN-280, and I-694 and I-35E. Other significant urban and suburban intersections are located across the county as well. • Bridges and Overpasses – Ramsey County has a number of key bridges and overpasses including a number that span the Mississippi River and interstate and highway overpasses. • Railroads – Ramsey County is a significant hub for rail transportation in the region, with BNSF Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, Canadian Pacific Railway, and Amtrak providing freight and passenger services with the county. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 51 • Airports – While the major airport that services Ramsey County, Minneapolis – Saint Paul International Airport (MSP) is located in adjacent Hennepin County, portions of Ramsey County will be in the flight path for MSP. In addition, there are two smaller airports located within the County: Saint Paul Downtown Airport (STP) and Lake Elmo Airport. Electrical/Fuel Shortages • Power plants – The county has a number of power generation facilities that provide service to local and regional energy supply. Two significant stations include Xcel Energy – High Bridge and District Energy Saint Paul. • Transmission Lines – The exact location of electrical transmission lines can vary, and are typically mapped by utility companies, such as Xcel Energy. They are usually strategically located along major transportation routes, utility corridors, and near industrial zones. • Substations – In Ramsey County, several substations are operated by utility companies to manage and distribute electrical power. Some of the key locations include Riverside Substation, Rice Street Substation, Dale Street Substation, Midway Substation, Downtown Substation, and Roseville Substation. Exact locations can be identified by the electrical companies. • Fuel Storage Facilities – Fuel storage facilities are distributed across the region to support residential, commercial, and industrial fuel needs. • Distribution Networks – Distribution networks consist of a combination of overhead and underground power lines, transformers, and substations. These networks are typically managed by utility companies. • Pipelines – Ramsey County is intersected by several major pipelines that transport various types of products, including oil, natural gas, and refined products. Supply Chain Disruption • Warehouses and distribution centers – Ramsey County has several significant warehouses and distribution centers that support a range of industries. They are typically located in close proximity to major highways, transportation hubs, and industrial zones. • Transportation Hubs – There are a number of transportation hubs that facilitate the movement of goods throughout the region including MSP, rail lines, and key interstate interchanges such as I-94 and I-35E and I-694 and I-35E. • Manufacturing Plants – Ramsey County is home to a number of notable manufacturers that support a diverse range of industries including machinery, food production, and consumer goods. Key industrial areas include Maplewood Industrial Area, Midway Industrial Area, and Roseville Industrial Area. Water Contamination • Water Treatment Plants – the key water treatment facilities in Ramsey are Saint Paul Regional Water Services, Metro Wastewater Reclamation Point, Saint Paul Water Treatment Plant, all located within Saint Paul. There are also a number of facilities located across the county, operated by Ramsey County Regional Water, which service specific communities and townships. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 52 • Industrial Sites – There are a number of industrial sites within the county that have the potential to release pollutants into water sources due to chemical runoff, wastewater discharges, accidental spills/leaks, stormwater runoff, airborne contaminants, and poor waste disposal practices. • Landfills – In addition to the Ramsey County Household Hazardous Waste Facility and the Ramsey/Washington Recycling & Energy Center, a number of landfills and waste management facilities handle municipal solid waste, construction debris, and other types of waste with the potential to impact water sources. Some former sites are now currently closed but continue to be monitored. 3.15.3 EXTENT The extent of infrastructure failure can vary widely due to several factors including the scale of the incident, the affected location, and the resilience of the infrastructure. • Transportation incidents – can cause localized disruptions, safety risks, and economic impacts. • Electrical/Fuel Shortages – widespread outages can affect homes, businesses, and critical services, creating economic impacts and public health and safety concerns. • Supply chain disruptions – can have cascading effects across any number of industries, leading to shortages of goods, increased prices, and economic instability. Delays in the delivery of raw materials can affect manufacturing processes and operations. • Water contamination – can have significant health risks, short- and long-term environmental impacts, and costly economic impacts. 3.15.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has experienced various infrastructure failures over the years, significantly impacting the community, local economy, and the environment. • Transportation incidents – the most notable transportation accident in Minnesota history was the I-35W Bridge Collapse in 2007. While the event occurred in Minneapolis, it significantly impacted the broader Twin Cities area, including Ramsey County. • Electrical/Fuel Shortages – Severe winter storms have caused widespread power outages over the year, impacting homes, business, and critical infrastructure. • Supply chain disruptions – COVID-19 caused global and local supply chain disruptions, including in Ramsey County. Additionally, significant floods in the 1960, and most recently 2024, disrupted transportation routes and logistics. • Water contamination – In 2017, elevated levels of lead were detected in drinking water in sections of Saint Paul, prompting a response to improve water safety measures. 3.15.5 PROBABILITY The overall probability of infrastructure failures in Ramsey County is likely moderate, with some high risk during extreme weather events. The most likely causes of such failures include severe winter weather, flooding, and other weather-related events. Aging transportation infrastructure, such as road and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 53 bridges, and human caused impacts to communication systems and power grids can also increase the probability of failure. 3.15.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change may have profound impacts on infrastructure, leading to failures in the identified systems. Extreme weather events, specifically temperature extremes, are most likely to impact Ramsey County. Possible impacts include: • Transportation - Damaged roads, bridges, and railways from buckling road washouts, landslides, and structural failures. • Electrical and Fuel Shortages – Damage to power lines, substations, and power plants, leading to outages. Extreme temperatures can also lead to increased demand, putting additional strain on electrical grids. • Supply Chain Disruption – temperature changes can affect transportation infrastructure, delaying or restricting the delivery of goods and raw materials, as well as affecting the storage and preservation of goods. Climate change can also lead to resource scarcity, affecting the availability of raw materials. • Water Contamination – Flooding and increased runoff can overwhelm sewage and wastewater systems, introducing pollutants into water supplies 3.15.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Communities, including Ramsey County, are increasingly vulnerable to various types of infrastructure failures, which can significantly impact daily life, economic stability, and public health. 3.15.7.1 People Infrastructure failure can have immediate and long-term health consequences, including injuries and fatalities, disease outbreaks, and limited access to healthcare and emergency services. The community can also suffer economic impacts from job losses, increased costs for basic needed, and economic instability. 3.15.7.2 Property Residents and businesses can suffer damages from accidents, power surges, and structural failures. Supply chain disruptions can impact property development and ongoing maintenance. 3.15.7.3 Environment Transportation incidents and proximity to industrial areas can impact the environment by contaminating soil and water, harming aquatic life, soil quality, and broader ecosystems from pollutants and toxins. Increased reliance on non-renewable energy sources can lead to higher emissions and environmental degradation as well. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 54 3.15.7.4 County and Community Operations Infrastructure failures can stress the community’s ability to respond quickly and effectively, disrupting public services and increasing costs for repairs and recovery. Increased public health responsibilities, delays in procurement, and long-term environmental remediation and management can also result from any number of infrastructure failures. 3.15.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public • Transportation Failure: o Restricted mobility and access to essential services (e.g., hospitals, grocery stores). o Increased risk of accidents and injuries due to unsafe road conditions or lack of public transportation. o Potential isolation of communities, especially in rural or remote areas • Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Loss of heating, cooling, and lighting in homes, leading to discomfort or health risks. This could be particularly consequential for vulnerable populations, particularly those who rely on power for medical equipment. o Disruption of communication channels (e.g., internet, phone) that rely on electricity. o Fuel shortages affecting transportation, emergency services, and daily commuting. • Supply Chain Disruption: o Shortages of essential goods, including food, medicine, and other critical supplies. o Panic buying, leading to further scarcity and possible civil unrest. o Increased prices due to scarcity, disproportionately affecting low-income households. • Water Contamination: o Health risks from consuming or using contaminated water, leading to outbreaks of waterborne diseases. o Need for boil water advisories or reliance on bottled water, adding to public stress and expense. o Disruption of daily hygiene practices and sanitation, exacerbating public health issues. Impact on Responders • Transportation Failure: o Delayed response times due to blocked or damaged roads and bridges. o Limited access to affected areas, hampering rescue and relief efforts. • Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Compromised communication systems and reduced operational capacity. o Difficulty maintaining emergency power in critical facilities, including public safety, hospitals, and shelters. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 55 o Fuel shortages affecting transportation and emergency services. • Supply Chain Disruption: o Shortages of necessary equipment and supplies for responders (e.g., medical supplies, fuel). o Increased operational strain due to the need to source and transport scarce resources. • Water Contamination: o Increased demand on emergency medical services to address waterborne illnesses. o Challenges in ensuring safe water supply for responders and affected populations. Continuity of Operations • Transportation Failure: o Inability to maintain essential services and logistics, affecting government operations. o Delays in implementing recovery and rebuilding efforts. • Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Disruption of critical infrastructure operations, including communication, healthcare, and public safety systems. o Reduced capacity to maintain order and provide public services. • Supply Chain Disruption: o Delays or failures in delivering essential goods and services, including food, medicine, and emergency supplies. o Increased pressure on government resources to manage and mitigate shortages. • Water Contamination: o Interruptions in water-dependent services, such as sanitation, healthcare, and firefighting, and manufacturing. o Increased need for emergency water distribution and purification efforts. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure • Transportation Failure: o Damage to roads, bridges, and public transit systems, requiring costly repairs. o Potential secondary impacts, such as flooding or erosion, due to compromised transportation infrastructure. • Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Damage to electrical grids and fuel supply systems, leading to prolonged outages. o Increased wear and tear on backup systems, requiring additional maintenance and replacement. • Supply Chain Disruption: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 56 o Increased demand on storage and distribution facilities, possibly leading to infrastructure strain. • Water Contamination: o Damage to water treatment plants and distribution systems, requiring extensive repairs. o Short- and long-term degradation of water quality, affecting property values and infrastructure resilience. Impact on the Environment • Transportation Failure: o Increased environmental damage from alternative routes or modes of transportation (e.g., off-road driving, increased air travel). o Potential for environmental contamination from damaged transport vehicles or infrastructure. • Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Increased reliance on backup generators, leading to higher emissions and environmental degradation. o Potential for fuel spills or leaks, contaminating soil and water sources. • Supply Chain Disruption: o Increased waste from spoiled goods and unused inventory, leading to environmental pollution. o Potential for illegal dumping or improper disposal of hazardous materials. • Water Contamination: o Harm to aquatic ecosystems and wildlife due to polluted water sources. o Long-term soil and water degradation, affecting agriculture and natural habitats. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction • Transportation Failure: o Economic losses due to costs to repair and replace transportation systems, reduced productivity, disrupted trade, and increased transportation costs. o Long-term impacts on tourism, commerce, and investment due to damaged infrastructure. • Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Increased operational costs for businesses and households due to reliance on alternative power sources. o Potential business closures or relocations due to unreliable power and fuel supply. • Supply Chain Disruption: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 57 o Loss of revenue for both public and private sectors due to inventory shortages and delayed deliveries. o Increased inflation due to scarcity of goods and rising transportation costs. • Water Contamination: o Economic impact on agriculture, fisheries, and industries dependent on clean water. o Increased healthcare costs due to illness and long-term water treatment expenses. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance • Transportation Failure: o Public dissatisfaction with government preparedness and response to infrastructure failures. o Perception of government incompetence in maintaining essential services. • Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Loss of public trust in the government's ability to ensure reliable energy and fuel supplies. o Increased public pressure on leadership to address energy infrastructure vulnerabilities. • Supply Chain Disruption: o Erosion of confidence in government oversight and regulation of supply chains. o Potential for civil unrest or protest due to perceived government inaction or mismanagement. • Water Contamination: o Significant loss of public trust in the government's ability to protect public health and safety. o Heightened scrutiny of water management policies and possible legal or political repercussions. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 58 4. Hazard Mitigation Strategy 4.1 Plan Goals The planning process included a review and update of the prior mitigation goals and objectives as a basis for the planning process and selection of appropriate mitigation actions addressing all hazards of concern. Of particular importance was addressing hazards disproportionately affecting populations with increasing risk to climate impacts. Upon consideration, participating jurisdictions opted to change the goals from the 2019 plan update to better align with county and community mitigation efforts. The 2025 goals are: Goal 1. Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy and the environment from natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 2. Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological, and human- caused hazards. Goal 3. Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against impacts of natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 4. Increase education, outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resiliency. Communities were encouraged to use these goals as guideposts when reviewing, updating and adding new hazard mitigation actions. 4.2 Strategy Development Using the updated goals as a planning tool to guide mitigation planning efforts, the LPT collaborated to identify a 2025 hazard mitigation strategy that is both effective and feasible for the county and participating communities. As part of the process, communities reviewed the mitigation strategy from the previous plan and reported on the status of specific hazard mitigation actions, and then reviewed capabilities and risks to identify new hazard mitigation actions as appropriate. At the beginning of the planning process, the planning team set out participation requirements for jurisdictions to be considered full participants in the hazard mitigation plan. Among these requirements, each participating jurisdiction was required to identify at least one new or continuing hazard mitigation action to reduce risk in their community. 4.3 2019 Mitigation Action Reporting Communities were asked to review and update the hazard mitigation actions that were identified in the 2019 plan to better understand the progress that they had made, and to identify actions that they wanted to keep for the 2025 plan update. Communities reviewed each action and identified it in one of four categories: • Completed. The action has been completed. • Not started. The action has not been started but should be included in the updated strategy. • In progress. The action has been started but should still be included in the updated strategy. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 59 • Cancelled. The action is no longer relevant and should be cancelled. 4.4 Completed Actions Community reporting on actions from the 2019 plan yielded the following completed actions. Action Community/Communities Justification Continue to enforce burning permits/ restrictions. Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale Permits and restrictions are in place; maintenance action. Continue to ensure the strong coordination between local fire departments to provide fire protection. Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton Coordination is in place; maintenance action. Continue to provide for public safety on roads through anti-icing (application of brine solution before an event), snow removal, salting and sanding to minimize the impacts of snow/ice accumulations on roadways. Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights System to apply this action in place; maintenance action. 4.5 Cancelled Actions Community reporting on actions from the 2019 plan yielded the following cancelled and completed actions. Action Community/Communities Justification Identify risks and issues preserving safety and security to users in parks and associated facilities shared by school district and city (LGUs). St. Anthony This is a public safety action. Continue to provide for public safety on roads through anti-icing (application of brine solution before an event), snow removal, salting and sanding to minimize the impacts of snow/ice accumulations on roadways. Vadnais Heights This is a response action. Identify risks and issues preserving safety and security to users in parks and associated facilities shared by school district and city (LGUs). Vadnais Heights This is a public safety action. Implement construction or retrofit projects for safe rooms or storm shelters in identified vulnerable locations. Vadnais Heights Included in different action. Promote water conservation measures to residents during periods of drought and enforce water conservation ordinances when needed. Vadnais Heights This is a response action. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 60 In addition, some 2019 actions were re-worded or combined with other actions. These actions are reflected in the strategy in Section 4.8. Finally, some 2019 actions were removed from the 2025 strategy due to being outside the scope of hazard mitigation. While not true hazard mitigation actions, they are still considered important by the communities that listed them. A list of these actions is included in Appendix A. 4.6 2025 Mitigation Strategy Elements For all new and continuing actions, communities were asked to provide background information on the action. Each action includes: • Mitigation action name • What is the problem the action is solving? • How does the action solve the problem? • Action status • Hazards the action helps mitigate • Plan goal(s) the action helps implement • Lead and support agencies for each action • Potential funding sources to support each action • Benefits of implementing the action • Estimated cost of the action • Estimated timeline for the action 4.7 Action Prioritization Communities were asked to score each action on a set of metrics. These metrics were: • Potential for lives saved • Potential for reduced property damages • Potential for reduced response actions • Whether the benefits of the action exceed the costs • Internal community action priority ranking Each metric was scored on a scale of 1 – 3, and the total scores were tallied up to identify a final priority ranking. Final rankings were based on a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 15. • 5 – 8 Low Priority • 9 – 12 Medium Priority • 13 – 15 High Priority Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 61 Once scoring was tallied, they were presented to the LPT and communities during the internal plan review process, along with the invitation to review and edit scores and prioritization as warranted based on specific community needs. Committee members were invited to review the scoring further during the committee plan review period and provide any additional comments or concerns on action prioritization; any comments received were reviewed and incorporated. 4.8 2025 Hazard Mitigation Strategy Ramsey County’s comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy features a wide range of alternatives that make real progress toward buying down the County’s and its communities’ risk from the impacts of hazards. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 62 4.8.1 BASELINE INFORMATION Table 29. Mitigation Strategy - Baseline Information Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 1 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township Ramsey Everbridge Public Notification during emergencies Continue to ensure that all Ramsey County residents are aware of and sign-up for the County’s Everbridge Emergency Notification System. Yes In Progress 2 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Saint Anthony Water Conservation Measures Groundwater conservation Promote water conservation measures to residents during periods of drought and enforce water conservation ordinances when needed. Yes In Progress 3 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Saint Anthony NFIP Participation Property Damage Mitigation Participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and enforce local floodplain ordinances to ensure that new construction is built above regulatory flood protection elevation. Yes In Progress 4 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, Lauderdale, New Brighton Weather Awareness Public alerts of potentially hazardous conditions Continue to promote the use of NOAA weather radios by residents, schools, businesses, and facilities that house persons with functional and access needs. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 63 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 5 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, White Bear Township, Maplewood, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale Critical Infrastructure Identification Life safety Identify critical facilities or infrastructure that do not have generator backup power in the event of a major power outage resulting from severe winter or summer storms. (Examples of critical facilities include Police/ Fire departments, EOC’s, health care facilities, water & sewer treatment facilities, and other facilities deemed as critical, i.e. public schools and sheltering facilities). Yes In Progress 6 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Little Canda, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, White Bear Township, Gem Lake, Roseville Comprehensive Plan Updates Emergency Planning Update County/City Comprehensive Plans and Zoning Ordinances to include mitigation considerations that help to reduce risk from natural hazards. Utilize data of past hazard events and future climate projections to help inform updates. Yes In Progress 7 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Saint Anthony, Ramsey County Flood Reduction Property Damage Mitigation Identify, prioritize, and implement localized flood reduction measures to improve drainage systems and reduce over-the-road flooding to County or municipal roads. Yes In Progress 8 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Little Canada, North Oaks, Mounds View, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township, Lauderdale, New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Saint Anthony Storm Shelter Life safety Implement construction or retrofit projects for safe rooms or storm shelters in identified vulnerable locations. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 64 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 9 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Maplewood, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Saint Anthony, White Bear Township Community Vulnerability Assessment Life safety Identify community areas, parks, and facilities (i.e., schools, government buildings, manufactured home parks) that are vulnerable to tornadoes and evaluate for potential construction or retrofit of safe rooms or storm shelters. Yes In Progress 10 Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Mounds View, North Oaks, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township, Gem Lake, North Saint Paul, Saint Anthony, Lauderdale Generator Backups Provide backup power to critical facilities Purchase and install generator hook-ups and encourage local generator purchases for identified critical facilities that should have backup power. Yes In Progress 11 Arden Hills, Gem Lake, Little Canada, Falcon Heights, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseview, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, Lauderdale All Hazards Education and Awareness Public Empowerment Continue to promote education & awareness on all-hazards and emergency preparedness for schools, individuals, families, and businesses. Yes In Progress 12 Arden Hills, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Maplewood, Roseville, Saint Anthony, Ramsey County Flood Technical Assistance Property Damage Mitigation Provide information & technical assistance to property owners to help mitigate against localized flooding during high-rain events (i.e., landscaping / green infrastructure applications). Yes In Progress 13 Arden Hills, Little Canada, Mounds View, North Oaks, Roseville, Shoreview, Gem Lake, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale, Saint Anthony Flooding Risk Assessment Identifying infrastructure prone to flooding for future mitigation projects Identify residential, commercial, government facilities, and/or critical infrastructure properties that may experience damage from future flooding and work to implement appropriate mitigation measures (including buy-out for property acquisition & structure demolition or relocation). Areas of focus may include previously unidentified flooding locations. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 65 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 14 Arden Hills, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, Roseville Overhead Powerlines Reduction in power outages Work with municipal electrical cooperative and power companies to reduce overhead exposure of power lines that are vulnerable to damage from severe winter/summer storms (i.e., high winds, ice, and heavy snow). Replace overhead power lines with underground lines in areas with high-risk exposure (i.e. high tree concentration areas). Yes In Progress 15 Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, Falcon Heights, Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, North Saint Paul, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights De-Icing Ice buildup Continue to provide for public safety on roads through anti-icing (application of brine solution before an event), snow removal, salting and sanding to minimize the impacts of snow/ice accumulations on roadways. Yes In Progress 16 Maplewood Outdoor Warning Siren Coverage Delayed outdoor notification to community members for severe weather. Ensures the community has adequate outdoor warning siren coverage. No Not Started 17 Mounds View, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township Wellhead Protection Plan Safe Drinking Water Ensure that wellhead protection plans are in place to address flooding that may lead to contaminated drinking water. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 66 18 Ramsey County Outdoor warning sirens This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County's ability to warn residents and visitors who are outdoors of impending hazards. Ramsey County will continue to maintain the three base Federal Signal siren systems and three repeater sites for Ramsey County's outdoor warning siren system. Ramsey County also encourages the addition of new outdoor warning sirens in areas where sound propagation is limited or does not exist. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 67 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 19 Ramsey County County and municipal planning programs This mitigation action addresses planning for long-term future growth in Ramsey within a community and ensuring communities are using standard, up-to- date zoning, floodplain management, building, and other codes Ramsey County will, every five years, review and update comprehensive plans to include mitigation considerations that help to reduce risk from natural hazards and utilize data from past hazard events as well as future climate projections to help inform updates. Yes In Progress 20 Ramsey County Building retrofits This mitigation action addresses the potential for damages to public or private property from severe spring, summer, and winter storms due to poor construction practices or construction materials. This mitigation strategy aims to promote annually at fire department open houses, retrofitting homes, buildings, schools, or public facilities with building materials such as wind resistant film for windows or installing lightning grounding systems, which will reduce the impacts of tornados, windstorms, or summer and winter storm events that can cause damage to property, personal injury or loss of life. Yes In Progress 21 Ramsey County Manufactured home tie-down straps This mitigation action addresses the potential for damages to manufactured homes from severe spring, summer, and winter storms. This mitigation strategy aims to promote annually at fire department open houses, retrofitting of manufactured homes with tie-down straps and skirting to reduce the impacts of severe spring, summer, and winter storms or tornadoes. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 68 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 22 Ramsey County NOAA weather radios This mitigation action addresses the problem of limited or delayed access to timely warnings for severe weather and other hazards, particularly for vulnerable populations such as those with functional and access needs. This mitigation strategy aims to promote annually at fire department open houses, the use of NOAA weather radios, ensuring Ramsey County's residents, schools, businesses, and facilities receive immediate alerts, enabling faster response and protective actions thereby reducing the risk of injury, loss of life, and property damage during hazardous events. Yes In Progress 23 Ramsey County Cyber security This mitigation action addresses the problem of vulnerabilities in the cyber security and physical infrastructure of Ramsey County's operations, which can be exposed to disruption from various hazards. This mitigation strategy aims to strengthen the cybersecurity measures and physical infrastructure resilience of municipal and county operations to reduce vulnerability to potential hazards, ensuring continuous service delivery and protection of critical systems against both natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Yes In Progress 24 Ramsey County Slope stabilization This mitigation action addresses the problem of erosion and slope failure, which can threaten critical infrastructure, roads, natural resources, and recreation areas. Working with Ramsey County Public Works, Parks & Recreation, and the Soil & Water Conservation District, municipal, and watershed districts over the next three to five years, Ramsey County EMHS will identify and prioritize areas where hillsides, banks or bluffs can be stabilized thereby reducing impacts to critical infrastructure, roads, natural resources, and recreation areas from erosion and slope failure. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 69 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 25 Ramsey County Enrollment in the NFIP program This mitigation action addresses the non- participation of a community in Ramsey County that is currently not enrolled in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Working with the municipal EMA over the next two to three years, Ramsey County EMHS will work to enroll this municipality in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Without NFIP participation, residents are at greater financial risk during flood events and may face higher recovery costs of flooding. Yes In Progress 26 Ramsey County County-wide Everbridge enrollment This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County's ability to notify residents, including those who use a language other than English, or may have other special needs such as vision or hearing impairment, of impending or on- going hazards that may affect them or their property. Ramsey County will conduct outreach annually to ensure Ramsey County residents, including those who those who use a language other than English, or may have other special needs such as vision or hearing impairment, are aware of and can sign up for the County's Everbridge Emergency Notification System. No New Action 27 Ramsey County Schools and higher education participation This mitigation action addresses the problem of insufficient disaster preparedness and resilience within educational institutions, which are often vulnerable to disruptions from natural hazards. This mitigation strategy aims to collaborate with local public and private school districts, as well as institutes of higher learning, to enhance their disaster preparedness and resilience through tailored risk assessments, emergency response plans, and structural mitigation measures. By integrating educational institutions into community- wide hazard mitigation strategies, the project aims to safeguard lives, protect critical infrastructure, and ensure continuity of education during and after disasters. No New Action Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 70 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 28 Ramsey County Natural systems preservation This mitigation action addresses the effects of wind and water erosion in natural systems such as lake shores, stream and riverbanks, and wetlands. This mitigation strategy aims to mitigate the effects of wind and water erosion by implementing targeted restoration and preservation strategies for impacted natural systems, such as wetlands. This involves activities such as reestablishing native vegetation, reinforcing soil stability, and enhancing hydrological functions to restore ecological balance. No New Action Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 71 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 29 Ramsey County Community outreach and public education This mitigation action addresses the problem of insufficient knowledge or preparedness among residents, businesses, schools, and facilities housing persons with access and functional needs. This mitigation strategy aims to provide annually at fire department open houses, education and awareness of the natural, technological, and human-caused hazards Ramsey County is exposed to and may impact the residents, visitors, businesses, schools, and facilities housing persons with access and functional needs, and actions they can take to lessen those impacts. No New Action Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 72 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 30 Ramsey County FEMA flood map updates This mitigation action addresses the problem of outdated or inaccurate flood risk information, which can leave residents, businesses, schools, and governments unaware of newly vulnerable structures or areas. Working with Ramsey County GIS over the next two to three years, this mitigation strategy aims to update flood maps potentially identifying structures in the floodplain thereby allowing residents, businesses, schools, and local and county governments to identify structures not previously set in the floodplain and make decisions about mitigation projects in new developments. No New Action Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 73 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 31 Ramsey County Safe rooms or storm shelter identification This mitigation action addresses the problem of insufficient protection for residents and visitors in Ramsey County's community areas, parks, and facilities that are vulnerable to tornados, windstorms, and summer weather hazards. This mitigation action aims to identify and prioritize Ramsey County's community areas, parks, and facilities that are vulnerable to the impacts of tornados, windstorms, and summer weather hazards and evaluate the need for the construction of a safe room or storm shelter. Yes Not Started 32 Ramsey County Underground utility construction This mitigation action addresses the vulnerability of overhead utility lines in high winds or from ice and snow. This mitigation strategy aims to encourage placing power and other utilities underground to reduce overhead exposure of power and cable lines that may be vulnerable to damage from severe winter/summer storms (i.e., high winds, ice, and heavy snow). Replace overhead power lines with underground lines in areas with high-risk exposure (i.e. high tree concentration areas). Yes Not Started 33 Ramsey County Backup generator needs This mitigation action addresses the problem of power outages impacting critical infrastructure, such as emergency services, healthcare facilities, and communication systems, which rely on continuous power to function effectively. This mitigation strategy aims to obtain generators and install generator hookups for critical infrastructure that does not have access to backup power in the event of power outages. Yes Not Started Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 74 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 34 Ramsey County Climate-based construction This mitigation action aims to address the problems of increased risks to public health, infrastructure, and environmental degradation caused by extreme heat events in Ramsey County. This mitigation strategy aims to reduce the effects of extreme heat by implementing measures that enhance urban cooling and reduce heat absorption. Key initiatives include installing permeable paving to improve stormwater management and reduce surface temperatures, creating greenways and planting trees to provide natural shade and lower ambient air temperatures. Additionally, the use of white or reflective roofs on buildings will help minimize heat absorption and reduce energy consumption for cooling. Yes Not Started 35 Ramsey County Water conservation This mitigation action addresses potential water shortages during periods of drought. This mitigation strategy aims, during times of drought, to promote water conservation measures to the residents of Ramsey County through social media during periods of drought. Yes Not Started 36 Ramsey County Lightning detection systems This mitigation action addresses the use of lightning detection systems in parks, beaches, and other open spaces due to insufficient warning from lightning strikes in outdoor recreational areas, where users are particularly vulnerable. This mitigation strategy, over the next two to three years, aims to identify and prioritize the installation of lightning detection systems in Ramsey County beaches, waterparks, picnic areas, and other open spaces providing an additional means of warning for lightning to the residents and visitors of Ramsey County's parks. Yes Not Started Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 75 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 37 Ramsey County CIKR exposure assessments This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County's need to identify and evaluate Ramsey County's critical infrastructure and key resources to exposure to risk and vulnerability, then identify potential mitigation efforts. This mitigation strategy, over the next two to three years, aims to identify Ramsey County's facilities that are the most vulnerable to natural and man-made hazards, such as flooding, severe storms, or cyber-attacks, and evaluate their current protective measures. Based on this evaluation, the county can develop targeted mitigation efforts such as infrastructure upgrades, enhanced physical security, and redundant systems to reduce exposure and vulnerabilities. Yes Not Started 38 Ramsey County Enrollment in the CRS program This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County and its municipalities non- participation in FEMA's Community Rating System (CRS) program. Working with the municipalities over the next two to three years, Ramsey County EMHS will explore participation in FEMA’s Community Rating System (CRS). The Community Rating System is essential for enhancing Ramsey County's resilience by incentivizing proactive floodplain management and hazard mitigation activities. Yes Not Started 39 Saint Paul Infrastructure Hardening This action mitigates the risk of infrastructure failures due to terrorism, natural disasters, or other hazards, ensuring the continuity of essential services and protecting public safety and the economy. Infrastructure Hardening - Conduct study to identify eligible projects and build capacity by mitigating key infrastructure nodes to harden against terrorism and other hazards Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 76 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 40 Saint Paul Business Continuity Planning Business disruptions during and after a hazard by ensuring that businesses can: - Maintain operations during an emergency - Minimize financial losses - Protect critical assets and resources - Reduce downtime - Enhance resilience Business Continuity Plan Development - Assist businesses in developing plans and resources to minimize hazard impacts. Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 77 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 41 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Chestnut Plaza Solves problems related to flooding risks, maintenance costs, operational disruptions, safety hazards, and long- term infrastructure sustainability. Chestnut Plaza - Feature Fountain Pump Pit Relocation Yes In Progress 42 Saint Paul Fire Safety Initiative This initiative addresses inadequate fire protection, fire- related injuries and deaths, rapid fire spread, property loss, inconsistent safety standards in publicly funded projects, and outdated fire codes, ultimately improving fire safety and resilience in residential buildings. Enact Combined Enhanced Fire Safety Ordinances - Automatic Fire Sprinkler Mitigation Initiatives a. DSI and Mayor’s Intergovernmental Relations personnel should continue to push for the adoption of the most current International Residential Code without any redactions of fire sprinkler requirements b. OFS, PED, and elected officials should pass an ordinance and make it standard practice that any housing renovations or construction of residential buildings funded in part or in total by city funding or tax incentives include the requirement to install fire sprinkler systems Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 78 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 43 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Flood Plain Review This project addresses problems related to flood risk awareness, preparedness, emergency response coordination, regulatory compliance, and decision-making in the floodplain areas of Saint Paul, helping reduce the impacts of flooding on at-risk structures Flood Plain Structure Inventory Project - Inventory all structures that are at flood risk within the Mississippi River flood plain at Saint Paul. Determine individual Risk Assessments for existing structures. Includes: inventorying (marrying-up with Conditional Use Permits), developing Key Contacts Lists, facilitate accomplishment of Flood Response Plans and the creation of maps. Yes In Progress 44 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Hidden Falls Park This action solves problems related to flooding, erosion, public safety, high maintenance costs, environmental degradation, and accessibility issues in Hidden Falls Park. Hidden Falls Park - Pathway Removal/Realignment near low spots along river Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 79 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 45 Saint Paul Fire Safety Initiative This initiative solves problems related to inadequate fire protection, high fire risk in public buildings, limited public awareness, post-fire safety rebuilding, legislative barriers, and financial constraints, ultimately improving fire safety, reducing fire-related damage, and promoting community resilience. Incorporating Fire Sprinkler Technology in New and Existing Buildings - Automatic Fire Sprinkler Mitigation Initiatives Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 80 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 46 Saint Paul Public Outreach & Education Emergency preparedness, public safety, weather resilience, terrorism awareness, community emergency planning, and economic development by equipping the public with information, tools, and resources to protect themselves, their properties, and their communities from a wide range of hazards. Promote the use of Family Emergency Plans, NOAA Weather radios, and Severe Weather Awareness activities... Winter; Promote use of home and auto survival kits and urge public to heed winter weather warnings... Summer; Coordinate with Libraries and Parks & Rec for cooling sites, and urge public to heed winter weather warnings… Terrorism; Educate and disseminate info on "See Something, Say Something campaign, common sense terrorism & CBRNE awareness... EOP and ESF's; Community Outreach Education, Planning Discussions... Economic Development; Educate citizens on low interest loans for improving structural ability of homes & businesses Yes In Progress 47 Saint Paul Fire Safety Initiative This program addresses problems related to lack of smoke detectors, low public awareness, fire-related injuries and deaths, improper installation and maintenance, and fire safety gaps in vulnerable communities, ultimately enhancing fire safety and saving lives. Smoke Detector Education Program - Continue to implement smoke detector education and giveaway program Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 81 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 48 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Upper Landing Relocating the pump pits for the Upper Landing Feature Fountains solves problems related to flooding, maintenance costs, operational disruptions, safety hazards, and extended downtime, ensuring long-term functionality and safety of the fountains. Upper Landing Feature Fountains (4) - Pump Pit Relocation Yes In Progress 49 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation Reduces flooding, improves public safety, minimizes disruptions, and lowers maintenance costs, ensuring long- term resilience for Water Street. Water Street – Due to persistent flooding events, elevate the street in numerous low areas. Finalize plans and complete Yes In Progress 50 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Watergate Marina This action solves problems related to flooding vulnerability, operational disruptions, high maintenance costs, safety risks, and environmental hazards, ensuring the long-term resilience and safety of Watergate Marina's electrical and fueling systems. Watergate Marina - Define and develop new facility electrical and fueling station systems to protect against annual flooding Yes In Progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 82 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 51 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation Improves resilience against flooding, prevents sewage issues, protects utilities, minimizes service disruptions, and enhances public health and safety. City House Building - Utility Protection & Sewage Ejector Relocation Yes Not Started 52 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Flood Plain Review The CRS Project addresses problems related to inadequate floodplain management, high insurance costs, flood vulnerability, community engagement, and non-compliance with best practices, ultimately enhancing flood resilience in Saint Paul and reducing insurance premiums for its residents. Community Rating System Project – This voluntary program recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities exceeding the minimum National Flood Insurance Program standards. This action tailors Saint Paul’s own particular hazards, character, and goals. The city implementing standards in turn ultimately leads to discounted premiums rates. Yes Not Started Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 83 53 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Crosby Park Repositioning the fishing pier during high water events addresses problems related to flooding, structural damage, public safety, accessibility, and maintenance costs, ensuring continued safe use of the pier. Crosby Bog Walk – Fishing Pier needs to be repositioned during high water events Yes Not Started Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 84 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 54 Saint Paul Emergency Evacuation Planning This action solves problems related to transportation disruption, emergency response delays, economic impact, public safety, traffic congestion, and commuter accessibility, ensuring continued movement and safety after a critical bridge failure. Develop alternate transportation plan for post-failure City-owned river or critical bridge failure or damage Yes Not Started 55 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Harriet Island This action addresses problems related to debris entanglement, high maintenance costs, dock damage, operational disruptions, and environmental impacts, ultimately improving the long- term functionality and sustainability of the Harriet Island Public Dock Harriet Island Public Dock - Add more structural support related to debris entanglement to reduce repetitive costs for contract debris and dredging Yes Not Started Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 85 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 56 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - NOAA Data Update This project solves problems related to outdated flood data, inaccurate floodplain boundaries, ineffective mitigation planning, regulatory non-compliance, and higher insurance costs, improving flood risk management and resilience in Saint Paul. Localized NOAA Atlas 14 Map Assessment Update Project - Utilize current data and provide updated assessment for Saint Paul flood plain. Yes Not Started 57 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - Mechanical Gate The mechanical gate prevents water entry, reducing the need for expensive post-flood repairs and clean-up efforts. The mechanical gate helps ensure continuous operations by preventing water intrusion. Mechanical gate used as a levee system to block water from infrastructure No Not Started 58 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation Addresses problems related to erosion, structural damage, navigation hazards, maintenance costs, public safety, and environmental protection, ensuring the long-term resilience of the bridge and surrounding area. Raspberry Island - Bridge Deflector Project needed. Develop plan and complete programming and construction Yes Not Started Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 86 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 59 Saint Paul Flood Mitigation - West Levee This project solves problems related to outdated data, inaccurate flood risk assessments, ineffective planning, regulatory compliance, and insurance pricing, improving overall flood resilience in Saint Paul. West Levee - Determine FEMA re- certification and PAL status Yes Not Started 60 St. Anthony Water Supply Protection The City's main water supply is not sufficiently protected from contamination. Protect the City’s municipal water supply from contamination Yes In Progress 61 St. Anthony Severe Weather Protocols Lack of safe policies and procedures during severe weather Develop safe policies, procedures and facilities to reduce injuries and losses resulting from severe weather Yes Not Started 62 St. Anthony Fire Flow Capacity Expansion Lack of sufficient flow capacity of water mains Increase fire flow capacity of water main, provide sufficient water to the public Yes Not Started 63 St. Anthony Surface Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater overflows existing capacity to carry surface water. Increase the amount of storm water removed from surface grade during rain events Yes Not Started 64 St. Anthony Safe Space Development A lack of safe spaces against hazards for local populations. Locate and create facilities capable of providing protection against likely hazards Identify and construct optimal safe structures to protect against probable hazards Yes Not Started 65 St. Anthony Control System Hardening A lack of prevention/protection measures against vulnerabilities of municipal weather systems. Prevent failure of control systems for water treatment facilities and municipal wells 3, 4, & 5 Yes Not Started Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 87 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 66 St. Anthony Sanitary Sewer Inflow/Infiltration Mitigation Inflow and infiltration into sanitary sewers, leading to sewer system backups Prevent inflow and infiltration into sanitary sewer, prevent sanitary sewer system backups Yes Not Started 67 All Urban Green Space Initiative Addresses the problem of urban heat islands, where densely developed areas experience higher temperatures due to minimal vegetation and heat- retaining surfaces. Identify priority urban areas with high heat island effects to develop green spaces, such as parks, green roofs, and shaded corridors. This project will involve planting native trees, installing permeable surfaces, and creating shaded recreational areas. By increasing vegetation cover, this action will help lower temperatures, improve air quality, and reduce energy demands for cooling. Additionally, green spaces can enhance stormwater management, reducing the risk of flooding during heavy rainfall by allowing for natural absorption. No New Action 68 All Business Resilience Preparedness Initiative Many small and medium-sized businesses in Ramsey County lack adequate preparedness for natural, technological, or human-caused hazards, leaving them vulnerable to disruptions that could jeopardize their long- term viability and impact the county’s economic stability. This action would equip businesses with the knowledge, tools, and training needed to prepare for, respond to, and recover from various hazards. The program would use educational materials from Ready.gov, facilitate business continuity assessments, guide program planning, and provide hands-on training and exercises to build resilience within the business community. No New Action Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 88 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 69 All Cultural Competency Communication Audit Hazard education, outreach, and public warning efforts in Ramsey County may not fully address the diverse cultural, linguistic, and accessibility needs of its population, leading to ineffective communication and reduced preparedness for certain communities. This action will assess current internal communication methods to identify gaps in cultural competency, especially regarding hazard information dissemination. By identifying barriers and recommending inclusive communication practices, the audit will help ensure that hazard messages reach and resonate with all community members. No New Action 70 All Senior Hazard Awareness and Preparedness Outreach Seniors in Ramsey County may be more vulnerable to the impacts of natural, technological, and human-caused hazards due to physical limitations, limited access to emergency information, and specific medical or mobility needs. Limited awareness or preparedness could heighten their risk in disaster situations. This action would deliver targeted education and outreach to the senior population, focusing on hazard awareness, preparedness actions, and mitigation strategies. This initiative includes informational sessions, accessible resources, and guidance on personal preparedness actions, such as emergency supply kits, evacuation plans, and home adaptations to mitigate hazard risks. No New Action Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 89 Action Number Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Action Status 71 All Enhanced Flood Risk Mapping and Vulnerable Population Assessment (EFRM- VPA) Current FEMA flood maps may not accurately reflect actual floodplain boundaries in Ramsey County, potentially leaving residents and businesses unprepared for flooding events. Additionally, vulnerable populations who are more likely to be impacted by flooding are not identified, which limits the county’s ability to provide targeted support and resources during flood events. This action will update FEMA flood maps to reflect current floodplain boundaries and assess structures at risk of flooding. Simultaneously, the project will map the locations of vulnerable populations within the flood-prone areas, such as low-income, elderly, and disabled residents, allowing the county to prioritize resources and develop targeted outreach and evacuation plans. No New Action Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 90 4.8.2 IMPLEMENTATION INFORMATION Table 30. Mitigation Strategy – Implementation Information Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 1 All Hazards Goal #4 Ramsey County Emergency Management & Homeland Security (RCEMHS) & Municipal Emergency Management Agencies (EMAs) County, municipal funding 2 Drought Goal #1 RCEMHS, RC Conservation District & Local City planning depts. County, municipal funding 3 Flooding Goal #1 Goal #4 RCEMHS, Municipal EMAs local city planning depts. County, municipal funding 4 Summer Weather Hazards Winter Weather Hazards Goal #1 RCEMHS & Municipal EMAs County, municipal funding 5 Summer Weather Hazards Winter Weather Hazards Goal #3 RCEMHS, RC Property Management & Municipal EMAs County, municipal funding 6 All Hazards Goal #1 RCEMHS in coordination with Ramsey County Community and Economic Development and local municipal administrators, Planning & Zoning Committees County funding 7 Flooding Goal #1 RC Public Works, City Public Works, MnDOT, Watershed Districts, County/City Budgets, MnDOT, Possible MN DNR Flood Hazard Grants or FEMA HMA grant for Localized Flood Reduction Projects / Infrastructure Retrofit 8 Summer Weather Hazards Goal #3 RCEMHS, RC Parks & Rec, Municipal parks & rec, and EMAs County, municipal funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for Safe Rooms 9 Summer Weather Hazards Goal #1 RCEMHS, RC Parks & Rec, Municipal parks & rec, and EMAs County, municipal funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 91 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 10 Summer Weather Hazards Winter Weather Hazards Goal #3 RCEMHS, RC Property Management & Municipal EMAs County, municipal funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for Generators 11 All Hazards Goal #2 RCEMHS & Municipal EMAs County, municipal funding 12 Flooding Goal #1 Goal #4 RC Public Works, RC Conservation District, and municipal planning/public works County/City Funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for Property Acquisition & Structure Demolition or Relocation 13 Flooding Goal #1 RCEMHS, RC Public Works, RC Property Management, RC Conservation District, municipal EMA County, municipal funding, DNR Flood Mitigation Grant, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Possible FEMA HMA grant for Property Acquisition & Structure Demolition or Relocation 14 Summer Weather Hazards Winter Weather Hazards Goal #1 RC Public Works, Municipal Public Works in cooperation the appropriate utility company. Coop / Electric Company funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for Infrastructure Retrofit 15 Winter Weather Hazards RC Public Works & Municipal Public Works County, municipal funding 16 Tornado and Windstorm Summer Weather Hazards Goal #1 N/A Municipal EMAs RCEMHS County, municipal funding 17 Flooding None Goal #1 none RC Public Works, MN Dept. of Health and local city public works depts. RC Public Works, MN Dept. of Health and local city public works depts. MDH Source Water Protection grant funding for wellhead improvement projects Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 92 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 18 All Hazards Goal 1 Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Emergency Communications Center (ECC), municipal EMAs County funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 93 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 19 All Hazards Goal 1 Goal 3 Ramsey County Community and Economic Development County funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 94 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 20 Tornado and Windstorm Summer Weather Hazards, Winter Weather Hazards Goal 1 Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Property Management, Parks & Rec, Saint Paul/Ramsey County Public Health, municipal EMAs, school districts County funding 21 Tornado and Windstorm Summer Weather Hazards, Winter Weather Hazards Goal 1 Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Municipal EMAs, manufactured home park owners County funding, municipal funding, MHP owner funding 22 All Hazards Goal 1 Goal 4 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County CPR County funding 23 All Hazards Goal 3 Goal 1, Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County IS County funding 24 Geological Hazards Goal 1 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Public Works, Parks & Recreation, Soil & Water Conservation District, municipal EMAs, local watersheds County funding, municipal funding, SWCD State Cost-Share Program, FEMA HMA grants, USDA grants, watershed funding 25 Flooding Goal 4 Goal 2, Goal 3 Ramsey County EMHS Municipal EMA County funding, municipal funding 26 All Hazards Goal 4 Goal 1, Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Saint Paul-Ramsey County Public Health (SPRCPH) in partnership with Twin Cities Public Television (TPT), Ramsey County Emergency Communications Center (ECC); Ramsey County Communications & Public Relations (CPR) County, Twin Cities Public Television (TPT) 27 All Hazards Goal 1 Goal 2, Goal 3 Ramsey County EMHS County funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 95 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 28 Flooding Geologic hazards Goal 1 Ramsey County Soil & Water Conservation Local watersheds Ramsey County Soil & Water Conservation funding, other watershed funding, private funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 96 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 29 Summer Weather Hazards Drought Flooding Geologic hazards Tornado and windstorms Winter weather hazards Goal 4 Goal 1, Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Saint Paul/Ramsey County Public Health, municipal EMAs, school districts County funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 97 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 30 Flooding Goal 1 Goal 3 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County GIS County funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 98 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 31 Tornado and Windstorm Summer Weather Hazards Goal 1 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Parks & Rec, Ramsey County Property Management County funding 32 Summer Weather Hazards Winter weather hazards; Tornados Goal 3 Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Public Works, Municipal Public Works, utility companies Utility company funding, FEMA HMA grants 33 Summer Weather Hazards Winter weather hazards; Tornados Goal 3 Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Property Management County funding 34 Summer Weather Hazards Goal 1 Goal 2, Goal 3 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Public Works, Ramsey County Property Management County funding 35 Drought Goal 4 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Soil & Water, local watersheds County funding, watershed funding 36 Summer Weather Hazards Goal 1 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County Parks & Rec County funding 37 All Hazards Goal 3 Goal 1, Goal 2 Ramsey County EMHS Ramsey County departments and agencies County funding 38 Flooding Goal 4 Goal 2, Goal 3 Ramsey County EMHS Municipal EMAs County funding, municipal funding 39 Flooding Infrastructure Goal 1 Emergency Management, Police, Public Works & Regional Water Parks Annual Operating Budgets and Law Enforcement Training and Terrorism Prevention (LETPP) grants Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 99 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 40 All Hazards Emergency Management, Police, MNDoT & Public Works PED Annual Operating Budget; public- private partnerships; grants 41 Flooding P&R PW Annual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA) 42 All Hazards Fire Safety FD, DSI Grant funding, Annual Operating Budget 43 Flooding DSI EM, Parks, PW Annual Operating Budget, Federal USACE funding, grant funding (FMA) 44 Flooding P&R Annual Operating Budget; grant funding (HMA) Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 100 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 45 All Hazards Fire Safety FD, DSI MN VOADs Grant funding, Annual Operating Budget Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 101 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 46 All Hazards EM & topic related departments and organizations Department PIOs Annual Operating Budget 47 All Hazards Fire Safety FD DSI, Red Cross Grant funding, partnership with Red Cross 48 Flooding P&R Annual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA) 49 Flooding PW Annual Operating Budget; transportation funding 50 Flooding P&R PW Annual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA) 51 Flooding P&R PW Annual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA) 52 Flooding DSI EM Annual Operating Budget, Federal grant funding 53 Flooding P&R PW Annual Operating Budget; grant funding 54 Infrastructure Failure PW Annual Operating Budget, various grant programs, 55 Flooding P&R Annual Operating Budget; transportation funding 56 Flooding DSI EM Annual Operating Budget, Federal grant funding 57 Flooding Infrastructure PW Grant funding 58 Flooding P&R and PW Annual Operating Budget, grant funding, transportation funding Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 102 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 59 Flooding DSI PW Annual Operating Budget, Federal USACE funding, grant funding (FMA) 60 Flooding Goal 3 Saint Anthony Public Works Utility fees 61 Summer Weather Hazards Winter weather hazards, tornadoes and high winds Goal 2 Saint Anthony Fire Department County/municipal funding 62 Flooding Goal 2 Saint Anthony Public Works County/municipal funding 63 Flooding Goal 3 Saint Anthony Public Works County/municipal funding 64 All Hazards Goal 2 Saint Anthony Fire Department; School District Grants 65 All Hazards Goal 3 Saint Anthony Public Works Utility fees 66 Flooding Goal 3 Saint Anthony Public Works County/municipal funding 67 Summer Weather Hazards Flooding Goal 1 Goal 2 Ramsey County Parks & Recreation Department Public Works Department, Environmental Health Department, Community & Economic Development Department, and the Public Health Department Ramsey County's Site Assessment Grants (SAG), Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Redevelopment Grant, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service Urban and Community Forestry Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Community Heat Resilience Grants Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 103 Action Number Main Hazard Mitigated Additional Hazards Mitigated Main Goal Additional Goals Responsible Agency Support Agencies Potential Funding Sources 68 All Hazards N/A Goal 2 Ramsey County Economic Development Department EMHSD, Public Health Department, and local chambers of commerce and business associations FEMA’s Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program and Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Program, DEED Small Business Assistance Grants, and local foundation (e.g., McKnight) 69 All Hazards N/A Goal 4 Goal 2 Ramsey County Communications Department EMHSD, Public Health Department, and the Human Services Department FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Minnesota Department of Public Safety’s Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) grants, and local foundations such as Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation 70 All Hazards N/A Goal 4 Goal 2 Ramsey County Public Health Department EMHSD, Human Services Department, and local senior centers and nonprofits (e.g., Meals on Wheels, etc.) HMGP, BRIC, Minnesota Board on Aging’s Community Grants, AARP Foundation grants 71 Flooding N/A Goal 1 Goal 3 Ramsey County Public Works Department EMHSD, Community and Economic Development Department, and the Public Health Department FEMA’s Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program, BRIC, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 104 4.8.3 RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION Table 31. Mitigation Strategy - Action Ranking and Prioritization Action Number What is the estimated cost of this action? What is the estimated timeline for this action to be implemented? Potential for Lives Saved 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Potential for Reduced Property Damages 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Potential for Reduced Response Actions 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Number of Hazards the Action Addresses 1 - Addresses One Hazard 2 - Addresses More Than One Hazard Benefits Exceed Costs 1 - BCA equal 2 - Minor Exceedance 3 - Major Exceedance Community Action Priority Ranking 1 - Low Priority 2 - Medium Priority 3 - High Priority Total 1 Under $50k Over 5 years 2 2 1 2 3 3 13 2 Under $50k 2-3 years 1 1 1 1 3 1 8 3 Under $50k 2-3 years 1 3 2 1 3 1 11 4 Under $50k Over 5 years 2 1 1 2 3 2 11 5 Under $50k 4-5 years 2 1 2 1 1 1 8 6 Under $50k 4-5 years 1 2 2 2 3 2 12 7 Over $1M Over 5 years 1 2 2 1 1 1 8 8 $501k - $750k Over 5 years 2 1 1 1 1 1 7 9 Under $50k 2-3 years 2 1 1 1 1 1 7 10 $250k-$750k Over 5 years 2 1 2 1 1 1 8 11 Under $50k 4-5 years 2 2 2 2 3 2 13 12 Under $50k Over 5 years 1 2 1 1 3 1 9 13 Over $1M Over 5 years 1 2 2 1 1 1 8 14 Over $1M Over 5 years 1 1 3 1 1 1 8 15 16 Under $50k Under 1 year 3 1 2 1 3 3 13 17 Under $50k Over 5 years 1 2 1 2 1 1 8 18 $51k to $250k Under 1 year 3 1 3 2 3 3 15 19 $51k to $250k 4-5 years 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 20 $51k to $250k Under 1 year 3 3 3 2 3 3 17 21 $51k to $250k 4-5 years 3 3 3 2 3 3 17 22 Under $50k Under 1 year 3 1 3 2 3 3 15 23 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 1 3 3 1 2 2 12 24 Over $1M 4-5 years 2 2 2 1 3 1 11 25 Under $50k 2-3 years 2 3 1 1 3 1 11 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 105 Action Number What is the estimated cost of this action? What is the estimated timeline for this action to be implemented? Potential for Lives Saved 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Potential for Reduced Property Damages 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Potential for Reduced Response Actions 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Number of Hazards the Action Addresses 1 - Addresses One Hazard 2 - Addresses More Than One Hazard Benefits Exceed Costs 1 - BCA equal 2 - Minor Exceedance 3 - Major Exceedance Community Action Priority Ranking 1 - Low Priority 2 - Medium Priority 3 - High Priority Total 26 Under $50k Under 1 year 3 1 3 2 3 3 15 27 Under $50k 2-3 years 3 3 3 2 3 2 16 28 $251k to $500k 4-5 years 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 29 Under $50k Under 1 year 2 1 1 2 1 1 8 30 $251k to $500k 2-3 years 3 3 3 1 3 1 14 31 Under $50k 2-3 years 3 1 1 2 3 2 12 32 Over $1M 4-5 years 1 3 1 2 3 1 11 33 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 1 2 2 2 3 3 13 34 $751k - $1M 4-5 years 2 1 3 1 2 3 12 35 Under $50k Under 1 year 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 36 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 3 1 3 1 3 3 14 37 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 2 2 1 2 2 1 10 38 Under $50k 2-3 years 2 3 3 1 3 2 14 39 $51k to $250k Over 5 years 3 3 2 2 1 3 14 40 Under $50k 2-3 years 1 2 1 2 1 1 8 41 Under $50k 2-3 years 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 42 Under $50k 2-3 years 3 3 3 2 1 2 14 43 Under $50k Under 1 year 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 44 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 1 2 2 1 1 1 8 45 $251k to $500k 4-5 years 3 3 3 2 1 2 14 46 Under $50k Under 1 year 2 2 1 2 1 2 10 47 Under $50k Under 1 year 3 1 1 2 1 2 10 48 Under $50k 2-3 years 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 49 Over $1M Over 5 years 1 2 3 2 1 2 11 50 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 1 2 2 2 1 1 9 51 $51k to $250k 4-5 years 1 2 2 2 1 1 9 52 Under $50k Under 1 year 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 53 Under $50k 2-3 years 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 54 $51k to $250k Over 5 years 3 1 1 2 1 2 10 55 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 106 Action Number What is the estimated cost of this action? What is the estimated timeline for this action to be implemented? Potential for Lives Saved 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Potential for Reduced Property Damages 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Potential for Reduced Response Actions 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Major Potential Number of Hazards the Action Addresses 1 - Addresses One Hazard 2 - Addresses More Than One Hazard Benefits Exceed Costs 1 - BCA equal 2 - Minor Exceedance 3 - Major Exceedance Community Action Priority Ranking 1 - Low Priority 2 - Medium Priority 3 - High Priority Total 56 Under $50k Under 1 year 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 57 Over $1M 2-3 years 1 3 3 2 3 2 14 58 $251k to $500k 4-5 years 1 2 2 2 1 1 9 59 Under $50k Under 1 year 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 60 $251k to $500k 2-3 years 2 2 2 2 2 1 11 61 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 62 $751k - $1M 4-5 years 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 63 $751k - $1M 4-5 years 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 64 $251k to $500k 2-3 years 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 65 $251k to $500k 2-3 years 2 2 2 2 2 1 11 66 $751k - $1M 4-5 years 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 67 $251k to $500k 2-3 years 1 2 2 2 2 2 11 68 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 1 2 2 2 3 2 12 69 Under $50k 2-3 years 3 2 3 2 3 2 15 70 Under $50k Under 1 year 3 2 3 2 3 2 15 71 $51k to $250k 2-3 years 3 2 3 1 3 2 14 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 107 5. Plan Implementation and Maintenance Maintaining and ensuring the plan is kept up to date are integral components of the hazard mitigation plan life cycle. A structured process for these updates keeps the HMP current, informs any changes in risk, and maintains eligibility to applicable funding sources for Ramsey County and its communities. Plan maintenance will be coordinated by: • The Ramsey County Emergency Management Coordinator. • The Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan Coordinator, as assigned. • The Ramsey County LPT, made up of representatives from each participating jurisdiction in Ramsey County. 5.1 Plan Implementation 5.1.1 FORMAL ADOPTION Formally adopting the Ramsey County HMP secures buy-in, raises awareness of the HMP, and formalizes the HMP’s implementation. Each jurisdiction participating in this plan will adopt it following all jurisdictional procedures. A copy of the generic resolution and the executed copies are included in the appendices. 5.1.2 IMPLEMENTATION Once the plan is adopted, each participating community may begin implementing the hazard mitigation strategy in Section 4 of this document. The mitigation strategy identifies responsible agencies and entities, general timelines, prioritization, and potential funding sources to assist in strategy implementation. 5.1.3 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER COMMUNITY INITIATIVES During the HMP annual review process, each participating municipality will be asked to document how they are utilizing and incorporating the Ramsey County HMP in tandem to their day-to-day operations and planning and regulatory processes. Additionally, each municipality will identify additional policies, programs, practices, and procedures that could be modified to accommodate hazard mitigation actions. Jurisdictions will ensure that mitigation efforts will translate into inclusive actions that enhance culturally competent practices that distribute resources fairly and justly to meet the needs of the whole community. The capabilities identified in in Section 2.10 offer a good starting point for further integration of the hazard mitigation plan into other community mechanisms. 5.1.4 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Ramsey County and participating jurisdictions are committed to the continued involvement of the public in the hazard mitigation process. Public outreach and dissemination of the HMP will include: • Links to the plan on municipal websites of each jurisdiction with that capability. • Continued utilization of existing social media outlets to inform the public of natural hazard events. Educate the public via jurisdictional websites on how these applications can be used in an emergency. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 108 • Expansion of outreach engagement strategies and use of alternative media platforms to reach the county’s hard-to-reach, diverse populations. 5.2 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan Ramsey County Emergency Management & Homeland Security (RCEMHS) will manage the maintenance and update of the plan during its performance period. 5.2.1 MONITORING Each year, beginning one year after plan development, Ramsey County and local community representatives will collect and process information from the departments, agencies and organizations involved in implementing mitigation projects or activities identified in their jurisdictional annexes by contacting persons responsible for initiating and/or overseeing the mitigation projects. Efforts will be made to equitably collect data from organizations and agencies serving disproportionately impacted populations. In addition to progress on the implementation of mitigation actions, including efforts to obtain outside funding; and obstacles or impediments to implementation of actions, the information that Planning Partnership representatives shall be expected to document, as needed and appropriate include: • Any grant applications filed on behalf of any of the participating jurisdictions. • Hazard events and losses occurring in their jurisdiction. • Additional mitigation actions believed to be appropriate and feasible. • Public and stakeholder input. • Fostering of new resilience relationships and partnerships. • Evidence of the leveraging and strengthening of social infrastructure, networks and assets. 5.2.2 EVALUATION The evaluation of the mitigation plan is an assessment of whether the planning process and actions have been effective, if the HMP goals are being achieved, and whether changes are needed. The HMP will be evaluated on an annual basis to determine the effectiveness of the programs, and to reflect changes that could affect mitigation priorities or available funding. The status of the HMP will be discussed and documented at an annual plan review meeting of the Planning Partnership, to be held either in person or via teleconference approximately one year from the date of local adoption of this update, and successively thereafter. At least two weeks before the annual plan review meeting, the Ramsey County HMP Coordinator will advise the Planning Partnership of the meeting date, agenda and expectations of the members. The Ramsey County HMP Coordinator will be responsible for calling and coordinating the annual plan review meeting and soliciting input regarding progress toward meeting plan goals and objectives. Plan evaluation will focus on four key areas: • Changes in capabilities Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 109 • Changes in hazard threat, vulnerability and consequences • Progress on achieving plan goals • Monitoring the implementation of the mitigation strategy, including project closeout Ramsey County will utilize an Annual Review Tool to assist in this process. This reporting tool allows for continual tracking of evolving risks to Ramsey County as well as progress toward the mitigation of the risks and impacts on all members of the community. The HMP will also be evaluated and revised following any major disasters, to determine if the recommended actions remain relevant and appropriate. 5.2.3 PLAN UPDATES Local hazard mitigation plans must be reviewed, revised as appropriate, and resubmitted for approval to remain eligible for benefits awarded under the DMA 2000. It is the intent of Ramsey County to update this plan on a five-year cycle from the date of initial plan adoption. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Appendix A – Additional Emergency Management Actions Through the process of developing specific actions focused on hazard mitigation, a number of participating jurisdictions identified additional actions that while not directly mitigating hazards, still provide value to the community in the preparedness, response and recovery phases of emergency management. These actions are presented in Table 32. Table 32. Additional Emergency Management Actions Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Saint Paul Emergency Evacuation Planning This action solves the problem of having no organized and effective evacuation strategy for downtown areas during emergencies, ensuring a well-coordinated response that prioritizes safety, traffic management, and rapid emergency services access. Assist in development Downtown Evacuation Plan Saint Paul Infrastructure Failure Planning Improves preparedness, public safety, traffic management, and interagency coordination in response to bridge infrastructure failures. Bridge Infrastructure Failure Plans - Assist in development of response plans of MnDOT owned bridges St. Anthony CIKR Access A need to regulate access to government offices and properties. Connect all city facilities to City Hall along with security system cameras and access key cards: develop the ability to provide a secure environment both from an entry access and visual standpoint of all city facilities from a central location. Facilities include water treatment plant, well houses, city hall, fire station, public works, park shelters/ warming houses and storage garage. Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale Fire coordination Fire departments oftentimes need to partner and work together to provide fire service. Continue to ensure the strong coordination between local fire departments to provide fire protection. St. Anthony Command Facility Continuity A lack of continuity planning related to command facilities. Develop contingency plans to ensure secure remote command center for local emergency responders in case of destruction or incapacity of primary facilities or infrastructure Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2 Jurisdiction Mitigation Action Name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? St. Anthony School Threat Protocols Lack of safe policies and procedures during school threat incidents. Develop safe policies, procedures and facilities to protect students, faculty and staff in situations with dangerous intruders have entered the campus Saint Paul Disaster Exercises Improves preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation efforts for flood disasters by simulating real-world scenarios in disaster exercises. Disaster Exercise Development - Develop flood recovery and mitigation scenarios and integrate into disaster exercises Saint Paul Extreme Temperature Sheltering This action addresses problems related to vulnerability to extreme temperatures, lack of preparedness, health and safety risks, uncoordinated resource allocation, gaps in shelter access, and strain on emergency services, ensuring safer and healthier outcomes during extreme weather events. Extreme Temperature Shelters - Coordinate with the Department of Parks & Recreation (P & R) to identify, procure, supplies and plans for implementation. Vadnais Heights Mass Shelter Providing safe space during evacuation Identify and prioritize an acceptable area(s) to house victims during a natural wintertime disaster St. Anthony Threat Identification and Risk Assessment (Property) A lack of understanding regarding the vulnerability of public spaces. Identify ongoing concerns and risks facing facilities and spaces (schools, parks, etc.) and identify critical infrastructure St. Anthony Threat Identification and Risk Assessment (People) A lack of understanding regarding the vulnerability of people in LGUs. Identify risks and issues preserving safety and security to users in parks and associated facilities shared by school district and city (LGUs). St. Anthony Traffic Control Signage Need to provide traffic control during signal failure (e.g., during power outages) Provide traffic control upon signal failure by obtaining 50 temporary, portable stop signs St. Anthony Law Enforcement Protections LE staff require protection from hazardous working conditions. Working in Hazardous Environment: Allow our Police Officers functional capabilities in a hazardous or potentially hazardous environment Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale Emergency Operations and COOP/COG plan updates EOPs and COOP/COG plans are vital to community readiness for disasters. Continue to update Emergency Operation Plans and COOP/COG plans to ensure that they adequately detail the needed steps to respond to all- hazards and ensure continuity of key government functions in the event of a disaster. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Appendix B – Studies and References Source Use United States Census Population data and statistics Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) Population data and statistics Ramsey County GIS Data and mapping Ramsey County Website County and community data University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership Climate data Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Climate data, specific hazards data Participating jurisdictions Community capability inputs 2019 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan Community, hazard and mitigation data Saint Paul Hazard Mitigation Plan Community, hazard and mitigation data FEMA Declared disaster data National Inventory of Dams Dams data Association of State Dam Safety Officials Dams data United States Drought Monitor Drought data FEMA’s National Risk Index Hazard risk data National Drought Mitigation Center Drought data Drought Impact Reporter Drought impact data National Weather Service Weather hazards data National Flood Insurance Program Flood insurance and program data National Centers for Environmental Information Hazard history and impact data National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hazard history and impact data Hazus Hazard impact data United States Geological Survey Hazard data Ramsey County 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Hazard data Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Hazard data Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Hazard data Weather.gov Hazard data Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology Hazard data Encyclopedia Britannica Hazard data Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Appendix C – Sample Adoption (LOCAL GOVERNMENT, INCLUDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS), (STATE) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) ADOPTING THE (TITLE AND DATE OF MITIGATION PLAN). WHEREAS the (local governing body) recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within (local government); and WHEREAS the (local government) has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as (title and date of mitigation plan) in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and WHEREAS (title and date of mitigation plan) identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in (local government) from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and WHEREAS adoption by the (local governing body) demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the (title and date of mitigation plan). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE (LOCAL GOVERNMENT), (STATE), THAT: Section 1. In accordance with (local rule for adopting resolutions), the (local governing body) adopts the (title and date of mitigation plan). While content related to (local government) may require revisions to meet the plan approval requirements, changes occurring after adoption will not require (local government) to re-adopt any further iterations of the plan. Subsequent plan updates following the approval period for this plan will require separate adoption resolutions. ADOPTED by a vote of ____ in favor and ____ against, and ____ abstaining, this _____ day of ___________, ______. By: _________________________________ (print name) ATTEST: By: _________________________________ (print name) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _________________________________ (print name) Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Appendix D – Planning Process Documentation From:Kyle Karsjen To:Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; Mayer, Bryan L; Kymmie Scott; Kerry Evans; Jessica Henry; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org Cc:Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update - Planning Meeting #1 Start:Thursday, June 13, 2024 12:00:00 PM End:Thursday, June 13, 2024 2:00:00 PM Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting The first meeting of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan update process will be held Thursday, June 13 at 1 PM. The meeting will be held virtually via Microsoft Teams – the login information is below. At this meeting, we will discuss:* Hazard mitigation planning and why it is important * The hazard mitigation plan update process and schedule * The role of communities in hazard mitigation planning * Capabilities assessment * Reporting on 2019 hazard mitigation actions * Public participation ALL jurisdictions are encouraged to participate. If you are unable to attend this meeting yourself, please forward it to someone else from yourjurisdiction who can sit in for you. If you have any questions, please let me know at kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> or 515-460-4711, or contact Bryan Meyer at brian.meyer@co.ramsey.mn.us <mailto:brian.meyer@co.ramsey.mn.us> or 651-266-1017. Kyle ________________________________________________________________________________Microsoft Teams Need help? <https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_MmI5MGYwNWMtNjQ1Yy00YzRiLTkzMDItODc1M2EzNTVkZjYx%40thread.v2/0? context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae-3622c748f8ed%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%223f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59%22%7d> Meeting ID: 243 061 722 000 Passcode: pvgPYv ________________________________ Dial in by phone +1 914-294-5479,,929315462# <tel:+19142945479,,929315462> United States, Yonkers Find a local number <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f9a8d180-71df-478e-aaf7-54711b1b13cb?id=929315462> Phone conference ID: 929 315 462# For organizers: Meeting options <https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=3f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59&tenantId=f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae- 3622c748f8ed&threadId=19_meeting_MmI5MGYwNWMtNjQ1Yy00YzRiLTkzMDItODc1M2EzNTVkZjYx@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en-US> | Reset dial-in PIN <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/usp/pstnconferencing> ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Kickoff Meeting – Thursday, June 13, 2024 – 1 p.m. – 2 p.m. CT Last Name First Name Representing Contact Brosnahan David Roseville David.Brosnahan@cityofroseville.com Christopherson Pat White Bear Township pat.christopherson@whitebeartownship.org Diaz Izzy St. Anthony izzy.diaz@savmn.com Freed Judd Ramsey County Judd.freed@ramseycountymn.gov Hearden Chris Vadnais Heights christopher.hearden@cityvadnaisheights.com Krause Nick Vadnais Heights nate.krause@cityvadnaisheights.com Lawrence Melissa Gem Lake melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org Lovas Mike St. Paul Mike.lovas@ci.stpaul.mn.us Mayer Bryan Ramsey County bryan.mayer@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US Peterson Greg White Bear Lake gpeterson@whitebearlake.org Richter Mike Vadnais Heights mike.richter@cityvadnaisheights.com Sather Matt Arden Hills, North Oaks & Shoreview msather@ljfd.org Schroeder Ryan Maplewood ryan.schroeder@maplewoodmn.gov Sieben Terry St. Paul terry.sieben@ci.stpaul.mn.us Smiley Don Little Canada don.smiley@littlecanadafire.org Zender Ben Mounds View ben.zender@moundsviewmn.org Karsjen Kyle Tidal Basin kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com Evans Kerry Tidal Basin kerry.evans@tidalbasingroup.com Henry Jessica Tidal Basin jessica.henry@tidalbasingroup.com Scott Kymmie Tidal Basin kymmie.scott@tidalbasingroup.com 2 Agenda / Discussion Welcome and Introductions - Kyle Karsjen, Tidal Basin Project Manager welcomed the group and asked attendees to sign in via Teams Chat, leaving their name, title, jurisdiction, phone, and email. He introduced himself and the team. The meeting was recorded. - Judd Freed and Bryan Mayer from Ramsey County also welcomed the group and thanked them for their participation, noting that this is the first time the City of St. Paul was participating in the multijurisdictional plan. Judd hopes this updated plan will not be just aspirational, but truly actionable. Bryan will be the primary point of contact for the County. Meeting Purpose: Update the Ramsy County Hazard Mitigation Plan Kyle discussed the purpose for the plan update, explaining FEMA’s requirements for Hazard Mitigation Plans and the five-year life cycle of FEMA approval. The previous plan was approved by FEMA in 2019. Kyle defined hazard mitigation and explained what a hazard mitigation plan is and does. A hazard mitigation plan: - Helps a community assess its level of capability in a disaster. - Helps a community conduct a data-driven review of their hazards, vulnerabilities, and risks. - Helps a community develop a hazard mitigation strategy. o What can we do? How can a community build off the capabilities in place to buy down the level of risk and vulnerability identified in the plan? o A hazard mitigation strategy can include things like building a flood wall, removing brush off wooded areas to remove some of the risk of forest fire, building earthquake-resistant structures, and removing structures from the floodplain, for example. What is Hazard Mitigation? Kyle spoke about what is covered in a hazard mitigation program and taking sustained actions to mitigate against the hazards. Mitigation takes place at the beginning and the end of the disaster process. It breaks the cycle of damage and repair in hazardous areas. He spoke about why hazard mitigation is important, including gaining eligibility for hazard mitigation funding sources. Kyle covered the mission areas of emergency management and where hazard mitigation fits in, at both the beginning and end of the emergency management cycle. What is a Hazard Mitigation Plan? Hazard Mitigation is a comprehensive process that allows the participating jurisdictions to answer: o Who are we? o What are our current community capabilities? 3 o What are our hazards and risks? o What can we realistically do to mitigate those risks? - Hazard Mitigation Plans: o Guide community hazard mitigation actions o Are created with the whole community o Are comprehensive and data driven. o Ensures eligibility for hazard mitigation funding sources. Major Focus Areas of the Update - Reporting on community progress - Updating community and hazards information where needed - Additional climate change focus - Meaningfully include underserved communities in the planning process - Reviewing and tightening the hazard mitigation strategy Planning Process Overview - Phase 1 – Kickoff and Community Reporting o Kyle outlined the participating jurisdictions, the community benefits from participation, and the requirements for participation, listed below:  Attend planning meetings and participate in the process. • This meeting serves as the first of 3 planning meetings.  Identify/update status of community capabilities.  Update status of any previous hazard mitigation actions.  Share public survey and public review drafts.  Develop at least one new or continuing hazard mitigation action.  Review and provide input on the plan and plan elements.  Adopt the plan once approved by FEMA. o Public Outreach  Public Survey  Traditionally Underrepresented Populations Engagement  Public Review Draft - Phase 2 – Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Tidal Basin will conduct an analysis on the following hazards: • Animal Infectious Disease • CBRNE/Terrorism • Cyber Attack • Civil Unrest • Dam/levee failure • Earthquake • Extreme temperatures • Flooding 4 • Hazardous Materials • Human Infectious Diseases • Invasive Species • Slope Failure • Summer Storm Events • Supply Chain Disruption • Tornado and High Wind Events • Utility Failure • Wildland Fire • Winter Storm Events Each hazard listed will have a hazard analysis and a risk assessment and will be ranked in order of threat, vulnerability and impact. - Phase 3 – Develop a Mitigation Strategy o Following the identification of capabilities and the analysis of hazards, the planning team and participating jurisdictions will work to identify mitigation actions that will buy down identified levels of risk. Each participating jurisdiction will be required to have at least one hazard mitigation action that they support. - Phase 4 – Plan Review and Approval o Kyle went over the review processes with the planning committee, public review, state review, and finally FEMA review. Immediate Next Steps - Community Reporting o Kyle discussed initial community reporting that each jurisdiction must submit. Jurisdictions will be asked to review and update their community capabilities assessment, as well as provide information on the status of projects identified in the 2019 hazard mitigation strategy. Tidal Basin will follow up with a separate email sent to each of the jurisdictional representatives identified in a community’s Letter of Intent to Participate. Forms will be sent no later than end of day, Monday, June 17, and reporting will be due June 28, 2024 - Public Engagement o The survey will be open to all members of the public. The response period for this will be June 24 through July 12. o Once the first draft of the plan update is completed, Tidal Basin will work with jurisdictions to post a public review draft in multiple public places, complying with jurisdictional rules on notifying the public and gaining their input. Future Steps - Planning Meeting #2 – NLT July 31 - HIRA Update – NLT August 30 - Planning Meeting #3 – August/September - Draft Mitigation Strategy – NLT September 30 - Plan Finalization and Review – NLT November 30 - Plan Approval and Adoption – NLT December 31 From:Kyle Karsjen To:Kymmie Scott; Kerry Evans; Jessica Henry; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; Mayer, Bryan L; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Cc:Jennifer Minwegen; Paul Peltier Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Meeting #2 Start:Tuesday, July 30, 2024 9:00:00 AM End:Tuesday, July 30, 2024 11:00:00 AM Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting The second meeting of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan update process is scheduled for July 30, 2024 at 10 AM CT over Microsoft Teams. During this meeting, we will review Tidal Basin’s initial findings for the updated risk assessment and discuss feedback and insights that the planning team can provide to ensure that the risk assessment provides a robust and accurate understanding of risk over the entire planning area. We will also discuss plan goals and begin the formulation of the updated hazard mitigation strategy. Community participation is vitally important to the hazard mitigation planning process. Please plan to attend this meeting, or if you cannot attend, please identify an alternate representative to attend in your place to ensure that your community remains an active part of the process. If you have any questions, please let me (kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> ) or Bryan Mayer(bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us <mailto:bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us> ) know. Thank you, and I look forward to talking hazards and risks with everyone on 7/30. Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> tidalbasingroup.com <https://www.tidalbasingroup.com/> ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams Need help? <https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_NThlMjU1MzYtODAzZS00NDg2LWJjNDktOTIxZjRkYWY4N2I0%40thread.v2/0? context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae-3622c748f8ed%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%223f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59%22%7d> Meeting ID: 277 310 207 922 Passcode: S7EvuZ ________________________________ Dial in by phone +1 914-294-5479,,935026685# <tel:+19142945479,,935026685> United States, Yonkers Find a local number <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f9a8d180-71df-478e-aaf7-54711b1b13cb?id=935026685> Phone conference ID: 935 026 685# For organizers: Meeting options <https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=3f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59&tenantId=f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae-3622c748f8ed&threadId=19_meeting_NThlMjU1MzYtODAzZS00NDg2LWJjNDktOTIxZjRkYWY4N2I0@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en- US> | Reset dial-in PIN <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/usp/pstnconferencing> ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Planning Meeting #2 – Tuesday, July 30, 2024 – 10 a.m. – 12 p.m. CT Last Name First Name Representing Contact Brosnahan David Roseville David.Brosnahan@cityofroseville.com Butkowski Heather Lauderdale heather.butkowski@lauderdalemn.org Diaz Israel St. Anthony izzy.diaz@savmn.com Freed Judd Ramsey County Judd.freed@ramseycountymn.gov Hearden Chris Vadnais Heights christopher.hearden@cityvadnaisheights.com Krause Nick Vadnais Heights nate.krause@cityvadnaisheights.com Linder Jim Gem Lake Jim.linder@gemlakemn.org Linehan Jack Falcon Heights jack.linehan@falconheights.org Lovas Mike St. Paul Mike.lovas@ci.stpaul.mn.us Mayer Bryan Ramsey County bryan.mayer@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US Mallinger Jason North St. Paul Jason.mallinger@northstpaul.org Minwegan Jen New Brighton jennifer.minwegen@newbrightonmn.gov Montain Matt Mounds View mmontain@sbmfire.org Peltier Paul White Bear Township paul.peltier@whitebeartownship.org Peterson Greg White Bear Lake gpeterson@whitebearlake.org Richter Mike Vadnais Heights mike.richter@cityvadnaisheights.com Sather Matt Arden Hills, North Oaks & Shoreview msather@ljfd.org Schroeder Ryan Maplewood ryan.schroeder@maplewoodmn.gov Sieben Terry St. Paul terry.sieben@ci.stpaul.mn.us Zender Ben Mounds View ben.zender@moundsviewmn.org Karsjen Kyle Tidal Basin kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com Evans Kerry Tidal Basin kerry.evans@tidalbasingroup.com 2 Agenda / Discussion Welcome and Project Review - Kyle Karsjen, Tidal Basin Project Manager welcomed the group and asked attendees to sign in via Teams Chat, leaving their name, title, jurisdiction, phone, and email. He introduced himself and the team, and the attendees introduced themselves. The meeting was recorded. - Kyle reviewed the purpose for the plan update, explaining the importance of mitigation. He then provided the plan update status; Task 1 – Project Initiation has been completed. The team is in the process of Task 2 – Capabilities and Hazard Identification which will be the focus of this meeting (Planning Meeting #2). The next meeting (Planning Meeting #3) will focus on mitigation strategies. Once the plan is drafted, it will be provided to the state and then FEMA for review and approval. - After reviewing the participant requirements, Kyle reminded the attendees that each jurisdiction will need to return their capability assessment and mitigation action status worksheets, if they have not already done so. Hazard Review Kyle walked the group through a discussion about each of the identified hazards listed below, including the understanding of the hazard, any updates to the hazard history since 2019, and any local context to provide in the final plan. The HMP will include both a hazard analysis and vulnerability assessment for each hazard. Dam/Levee Failure There are 5 identified dams in the county. • Classification: 1 High Hazard, 1, Significant Hazard, and 4 Low Hazard. • History: There is no history of dam failures/issues. • Impacts: St. Anthony Falls and Coon Dam could have some impact to the county water flow if they fail. • Ongoing Strategies: Battle Creek and Ford dams are required to and have EAPs. St. Paul has been involved in some planning efforts, but do not believe Battle Creek has ever conducted an exercise. This dam is the responsibility of the watershed. Drought • History: There is some history of drought in the region. Previous droughts have caused stoppage of passenger vessels and impacts to the port. • Impacts: In addition, White Bear Lake’s levels can impact recreational and residential used of the lake. There is an ongoing lawsuit regarding White Bear Lake. • Ongoing Strategies: Many, if not most, jurisdictions have instituted an even/odd watering schedule for residential use. Only the Governor can completely restrict water usage. 3 Flood • History: MN has received 30 federal disaster declarations due to flooding since 1957. Recent major Ramsey flood occurred in June 2014, July 2011, March 2010, and Sept 2007. • Impact: Ramsey is likely to be impacted by riverine and urban flooding. Heavy rains in conjunction with freezing temperatures and snowfall have caused impacts to urban areas. Areas of St. Paul (Water St. area) has low-lying roads, with both a number of local businesses and the Metro Water Treatment Plan have repetitive issues due to flooding and could be good to have a better flood water system considered for this area. • Ongoing strategies: There has been planning and additional mitigation strategies conducted for flooding in the county. This has helped mitigate past issues around the airport, Fort Snelling, and other park areas. Geological Hazards (Landslide, Slope Failure, Karst Soils) • History: There is a history of small landslides in the county, including in St. Paul and Gem Lake in the past few years. The landslide in St. Paul killed 2 children, and injured 2 more in 2013, when a bluff gave way. The landslide in Gem Lake caused a disruption to the railroad tracks. • Impact: Even with some sealing, there are still caves within the rock walls of the bluff which cause confined space issues. Additionally there are a number of old landfill sites which cause issues for development. • Ongoing strategies: Standard building permits do require soil analysis in most, if not all, jurisdictions. St. Paul has conducted some mitigation strategies including building a wall to protect from falling rocks. Hazardous Materials (Spills, Pipeline, Trucking, Rail) • History: There have been a few major events reported in recent history, in addition many smaller events have occurred which typically have a smaller footprint and don’t require widespread evacuation. • Impact: Gem Lake, and other jurisdictions, do not have city water, but utilize private wells. Chemical spills can impact ground water. There are a number of transportation routes (both rail and road) that traverse the county, carrying hazardous materials. Roseville has several fuel tank facilities, with approximately 370 semi trucks coming in and out on a daily basis. • Ongoing strategies: There were none identified during this meeting. Summer Weather Hazards (Heat, Hail, Lightning) • History: Ramsey County has reported at least $7M in damages due to summer weather events, primarily hail. Hail damage is covered by insurance and is typically underreported publicly. • Impact: Due to ongoing climate change, summers are expected to be higher temperatures with increased precipitation. Heat is a growing and significant concern. The population is changing, and recent immigrants are not used to the weather and tend to live with many people in homes without AC. Providing educational information about the impacts is also a challenge due to the number of languages spoken in the county. The unhoused population number is also growing. 4 • Ongoing Strategies: The Twin Cities metro area is starting an experimental program to analyze wet blub impacts. Traditional cooling centers have not been utilized. Public is instructed to use public facilities. The county is starting to look at resilience hubs as a potential mitigation strategy. Tornado and Windstorm • History: The largest recorded tornado in the county was in 1965, but given its geography, the county typically experiences straight line winds annually. • Impact: Typically there are not long lasting effects from these types of events, but property damage and power outages are always a concern. • Ongoing Strategies: 98% of the county is covered by outdoor warning sirens, but the technology is aging. Utility companies tend to maintain trees along major power lines. Small shelters, typically brick restrooms, are available in many public parks. Winter Weather Hazards (Cold, Blizzard, Ice Storm) • History: Since 1950, Ramsey County has reported 109 significant weather events. • Impact: There is an almost 100% probability of a severe winter storm in a given year, and climate change is expected to result in heavier snowfall and more extreme events, including warmer temperatures. Ongoing concern is not from snowfall, but an ice storm that causes significant and long duration power outages. • Ongoing Strategies: Ramsey typically uses a shelter in place strategy during a major winter event, with some facilities open on highways for trucks and passenger vehicles. Infrastructure Failure (Transportation, Electricity and Fuel, Supply Chain Disruption, Water Systems) • History: There have been some notable failures in recent history, such as the I-35 bridge collapse in 2007, water contamination in St. Paul in 2017, nationwide supply chain shortages during COVID, and electrical/fuel shortages due to annual winter storms. • Impact: Major concerns include aging infrastructure, such as roads and bridges, water infrastructure, and human caused impacts to communications systems and power grids. • Ongoing Strategies: These are not traditionally included in hazard mitigation plans as they are more random, without clearly defined areas, and are hard to build resiliency against, unlike most natural hazards. Human Caused Hazards (Terrorism, Active Shooter/Hostile Incidents, Civil Disturbance, Cyber Attack) • History: In addition to the incidents presented (cyber-attack in 2020, civil unrest in response to George Floyd killing in 2020, and protests and civil unrest surrounding the 2008 RNC), there have been at least 3-4 major incidents, including officer involved shootings, and the aftermath of presidential election results that need to be included. The county was also recently impacted by a major cyber outage, CrowdStrike. 5 • Impact: Hazards such as cyber attack can impact the county even if they are not located within the county as the city relies on outside services. Civil disturbances have caused damage to property and blocked roads and highways. • Ongoing Strategies: These are not traditionally included in hazard mitigation plans as they are more random, without clearly defined areas, and are hard to build resiliency against, unlike most natural hazards. Mitigation Strategy The focus of the next meeting, Kyle started the discussion around mitigation strategies including goals which describe the overall direction of the plan and actions which describe specific activities of projects designed to achieve the goals. Goals Common categories of Mitigation Goals are: public education, policies/planning/training/communication, reduce risk to life and property, and the protection of critical/essential facilities. It was decided to make the 2025 HMP goals more specific than were outlined in the 2019 plan. This will be a discussion item at Meeting #3. Actions These will be partly based on the information provided by each jurisdictions’ Mitigation Action Worksheet for reporting status updates of remaining 2019 actions and the development of any additional mitigation actions. It was noted that each participating jurisdiction must have at least one mitigation action in the plan, and that all jurisdictions that participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) must have an additional action that relates to the continued compliance in the program. Ahead of the next meeting, jurisdictions are encouraged to discuss potential mitigation actions with other representatives in their jurisdiction. Planning Meeting #3 The next planning meeting is set for Tuesday, August 27 at 1pm CT. This will be a virtual meeting focused on mitigation actions, including what actions should be included in the plan update. Next Steps Future Steps - Collect outstanding Capability Assessments and Mitigation Action Status spreadsheets - ASAP - HIRA Update – NLT August 30 - Planning Meeting #3 – August 27 at 1PM CT - Draft Mitigation Strategy – NLT September 30 - Plan Finalization and Review – NLT November 30 6 - Plan Approval and Adoption – NLT December 31 From:Kyle Karsjen To:Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Cc:Christopher Hearden; Jim Lindner Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Meeting #3 Start:Tuesday, August 27, 2024 12:00:00 PM End:Tuesday, August 27, 2024 2:00:00 PM Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting The third and final planning meeting for the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan update will be held Tuesday, August 27th from 1-3 PM via Microsoft Teams. This meeting will focus on mitigation action planning – we’ve identified community capabilities and identified community risks. What actions can each community identify to buy down those levels of risk? We will also use the meeting to button up some final elements of the plan. Please plan to attend this meeting; if you cannot attend, please identify an alternate representative to attend in your place to ensure your community remains up to speed on the planning process. If you have any questions, please contact me at kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> or Bryan Mayer at bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us <mailto:bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us> . Thank you, Kyle ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams Need help? <https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_NzExN2Q5MTgtMmM2ZS00NGY3LThmOTgtYWZkZWNhNjE4ODk5%40thread.v2/0? context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae-3622c748f8ed%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%223f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59%22%7d> Meeting ID: 233 606 703 437 Passcode: jpZuYv ________________________________ Dial in by phone +1 914-294-5479,,103758743# <tel:+19142945479,,103758743> United States, Yonkers Find a local number <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f9a8d180-71df-478e-aaf7-54711b1b13cb?id=103758743> Phone conference ID: 103 758 743# For organizers: Meeting options <https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=3f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59&tenantId=f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae- 3622c748f8ed&threadId=19_meeting_NzExN2Q5MTgtMmM2ZS00NGY3LThmOTgtYWZkZWNhNjE4ODk5@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en- US> | Reset dial-in PIN <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/usp/pstnconferencing> ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Planning Meeting #3 – Tuesday, August 27, 2024 – 1 p.m. – 2 p.m. CT Last Name First Name Representing Contact Artig-Swomley Gretchen Gem Lake Bownik Jim Lauderdale Jim.bownik@lauderdalemn.org Brosnahan David Roseville David.Brosnahan@cityofroseville.com Christopherson Patrick White Bear Township pat.christopherson@whitebeartownship.org Hamdorf Trevor New Brighton Trevor.hamdorf@newbrightonmn.gov Hearden Chris Vadnais Heights christopher.hearden@cityvadnaisheights.com Linehan Jack Falcon Heights jack.linehan@falconheights.org Lovas Mike St. Paul Mike.lovas@ci.stpaul.mn.us Mayer Bryan Ramsey County bryan.mayer@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US Mallinger Jason North St. Paul Jason.mallinger@northstpaul.org Montain Matt Mounds View mmontain@sbmfire.org Peterson Greg White Bear Lake gpeterson@whitebearlake.org Sather Matt Arden Hills, North Oaks & Shoreview msather@ljfd.org Schroeder Ryan Maplewood ryan.schroeder@maplewoodmn.gov Sieben Terry St. Paul terry.sieben@ci.stpaul.mn.us Smiley Don Karsjen Kyle Tidal Basin kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com Evans Kerry Tidal Basin kerry.evans@tidalbasingroup.com Henry Jessica Tidal Basin Jessica.henry@tidalbasingroup.com Scott Kymmie Tidal Basin Kymmie.scott@tidalbasingroup.com Agenda / Discussion Welcome and Project Review - Kyle gave a reminder on what hazard mitigation means, and how it relates to the other 2 phases of emergency management (preparedness, response and recovery). According to FEMA, hazard mitigation is “any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long- term risk to life and property from hazard events.” Hazard mitigation can also be defined as “any action that breaks the cycle of damage and repair in hazardous areas.” Kyle encouraged communities to keep these definitions in mind as they began updating their hazard mitigation strategies. - Hazard Mitigation is important for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that it ensures eligibility for hazard mitigation funding sources. Risk Assessment Review - Planning Meeting #2 focused on Ramsey County’s vulnerability to each of the listed failures. As a reminder, for a more well-rounded view of hazards, the County has included human-caused and infrastructure failures. - Kyle reviewed information on the risk assessment, including hazards assessed and the risk assessment components (threat, vulnerability, and consequence) - The risk assessment will be provided via email following this meeting for review and comment through Friday, September 13. Kyle encouraged the group to review and provide feedback, noting that communities know and understand their hazards and risks better than anyone, and we want to make sure that the information is included in the updated assessment. Mitigation Strategy Overview - Kyle reviewed the next step in the process – developing a hazard mitigation strategy with mitigation actions from each participating jurisdiction. Based on the risk assessment and available capabilities, the 2025 updated mitigation strategy will align with the County’s mitigation goals and objectives. - This strategy will guide a community’s approach for implementing mitigation activities that are cost effective, technically feasible, and environmentally sound as well as allowing strategic investment of limited resources. - Kyle reminded each jurisdiction that they have a baseline mitigation strategy to work from – the actions each community identified on the mitigation strategy worksheets, during the reporting process in the early summer as continuing in the new plan. - Kyle reviewed the goals for the 2025 hazard mitigation plan update. The goals are: Goal 1: Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy, and the environment from natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 2: Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 3: Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against the impacts of natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 4: Increase outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resilience. 3 - Communities were encouraged to focus on hazard mitigation actions when developing and updating their mitigation strategies. - Kyle reviewed the information needed for each carryover and new mitigation action. He also reviewed some helpful hints on what counts as mitigation and what doesn’t. Each action will include the following information to inform development and prioritization: • Problem statement/background • Method of implementation • Hazard(s) to be mitigated • Responsible party/parties • Estimated costs and benefits • Budget range • Potential funding sources - Each mitigation action will be scored and ranked in the final plan, based on potential lives saved, potential for reduced property damages, potential for reduced response actions, benefits exceeding costs, and community priority. - Each community has two options when it comes to mitigation planning: • Option 1: If a community would like some additional support, Tidal Basin invites you to set up a virtual meeting to further discuss your specific mitigation strategy and potential ideas for additional actions. • Option 2: If a community doesn’t need additional support, Tidal Basin will share materials and instructions to submit new mitigation actions. - All updated mitigation strategies and information are due no later than Friday, September 13. Next Steps Tidal Basin - Each community will receive a follow up email NLT end of week regarding information from this meeting. - Email will include current hazard mitigation strategy, instructions on setting up community meetings, instructions to submit new mitigation actions. Communities - Decide whether you want a community meeting. Let us know sooner rather than later. - Review and provide feedback on Draft #1 of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment. - Update carryover mitigation actions and submit any new mitigation actions NLT Friday, September 13 4 Timeline for Future Activities - Draft plan compiled – Early October - Draft plan sent to communities for review – Early October - Public review draft – Mid October - State review – Early November - FEMA review – Mid November - FEMA approval – December - Plan adoption – December/January Action Items Task Responsibility Date Provide first draft of hazard analysis and risk assessment Tidal Basin August 30, 2024 Distribute meeting materials and materials for updating community mitigation strategies Tidal Basin August 30, 2024 Complete community meetings Tidal Basin September 11, 2024 Review and provide comment on first draft of hazard analysis and risk assessment Participating jurisdictions September 13, 2024 Provide new mitigation actions and updated mitigation strategies for each community Participating jurisdictions September 13, 2024 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE 2025 Plan Update Goals Goal 1 Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy and the environment from natural, technological, and human- caused hazards. Goal 2 Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 3 Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against the impacts of natural, technological and human- caused hazards. Goal 4 Increase outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resiliency. Ramsey County, MN Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mitigation Action Planning What does my community need to complete by Friday, September 13? Communities are asked to utilize the excel spreadsheet attached to this document to refine the actions already included, and to add new any mitigation actions as appropriate. Answer the questions at the top of each column for each action added or refined. Please answer every question. Some questions include a drop-down menu where respondents can select from a pre-identified list of answers. Answers do not have to be perfect but should give an idea of the parameters of the mitigation actions. The excel spreadsheet is currently populated with all mitigation actions contained in the 2019 hazard mitigation plan, along with some Tidal Basin recommendations. Why Is mitigation action planning important? Throughout the mitigation planning process, each community has already provided multiple inputs into the process – you’ve reported on the status of your 2019 hazard mitigation actions, you’ve provided an update on community capabilities, and you’ve reviewed and provided comment on the hazard analysis and risk assessment. The next step is mitigation action planning – now that we have a new and better understanding of our risk, what should we do to mitigate the impacts of the hazards to which we are vulnerable? When implemented, a good hazard mitigation strategy effectively buys down risk and is “where the rubber meets the road” in the hazard mitigation plan update. What tools are available to help my community refine mitigation actions and add additional actions to our mitigation strategy? There are a few resources communities should utilize when refining and adding new mitigation actions to their mitigation strategy. • Plan Goals – the goals were updated from the 2019 plan update. These goals can be used to generate mitigation actions. A list of the goals can be found here. • We also discussed some helpful hints for mitigation action development during our third planning meeting Tuesday, August 27. I encourage you to review that recording if you weren’t able to attend (found here). What do I do if my community is totally lost and needs some additional help? If your community could use some extra help, Tidal Basin is offering to hold 30 – 60 minute virtual meetings to help walk you through the process and provide some additional insights. Virtual meetings can be set up by email Kymmie Scott at kymmie.scott@tidalbasingroup.com. My community provided updates to the projects listed in our strategy from the 2019 plan – why do I have to do anything else? The actions identified by each community in the 2019 plan serve as a baseline for the 2025 update, but communities are asked to review the list again, refine their existing migration actions, and add new ones based on updated hazard and risk information found in the updated plan. From:Kyle Karsjen To:Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; Mayer, Bryan L; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Cc:Kymmie Scott; Kerry Evans; Jessica Henry Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Survey - please share far and wide Date:Monday, June 24, 2024 1:15:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Ramsey County HMP Survey Flyer.jpg Ramsey County HMP Survey Flyer.pdf image001.jpg Good afternoon, As discussed during our hazard mitigation plan kickoff earlier this month, we are pleased to announce that the public survey intended to gather information from respondents on their experiences, knowledge, and concerns about local hazards as a component of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan is live and will remain open through Friday, July 12th. We are asking each community to share the survey far and wide, using whatever methods you would traditionally use to share information with your residents. This can include posting the information on public websites, sharing it through a community’s social media such as Facebook, or utilizing messaging systems to invite the public to complete the survey. Please share the survey no later than Wednesday, June 26th. When you share it, please send screenshots of what you’ve shared to kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com so that we can include those records as part of the plan. Please let me know if your community has any questions on the resources below or need any additional information. The survey can be found at https://forms.office.com/r/tk5ySqn1Ha. I’vealso attached a flyer in both jpeg and adobe pdf you can use as you see fit to share. See below forsome sample text that you can use to share the survey: Use or adapt the following when posting or communicating the availability of this survey to the public: Ramsey County has begun the process of updating the 2019 Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) soall municipalities in Ramsey County remain eligible to receive certain types of federal mitigationfunding to reduce hazard risk. The HMP focuses on understanding the natural risks and hazardsthat threaten the county, identifying community capabilities that can be used to mitigate risks,and laying out a comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy to buy down risks from thosehazards. Public participation and feedback is an important part of the hazard mitigation planningprocess. Ramsey County Emergency Management and Homeland Security has developed abrief survey to assist in providing the public with an opportunity to contribute to the planupdate. The survey focuses on the public’s experiences with hazards, includingrecommendations for hazard reduction. The input provided is vital to completing the planupdate. All information collected from this survey will be anonymous. Please complete the survey by Friday, July 12th at: https://forms.office.com/r/tk5ySqn1Ha. Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com MORRIS COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2024 UPDATE Morris County and participating municipalities are preparing an update of the Countywide Hazard Mitigation Plan. The goal of this plan is to identify ways that Morris County communities can reduce damages from future hazards. As part of the planning process, we are looking for your input on what natural hazards affect you most and how. Ramsey County resident, or work in the county? Take our survey! https://forms.office.com/r/tk5ySqn1Ha Or Scan: For more information about the hazard mitigation process, please contact: Ramsey County Emergency Management & Homeland Security (RCEMHS) (651) 266-1020 Visit the RCEMHS Website WE NEED YOUR INPUT! RAMSEY COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Ramsey County and participating municipalities are preparing an update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The goal of this plan is to identify ways that Ramsey County communities can reduce damages from future hazards. As part of the planning process, we seek your input on which hazards impact you most and in what ways. From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:mmontain@sbmfire.org; Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Date:Friday, August 30, 2024 2:26:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image004.jpg Good afternoon, and happy long weekend! The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) for Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update is ready for review and comment. This draft represents our first stab at reviewing Ramsey County’s hazards and their potential impacts on the community. The draft also includes an initial hazard prioritization based on three factors – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Please note that you have direct control over everything in the HIRA – please provide me any feedback on where we may have gotten something wrong on hazards, or other edits we can make. As you read through the document, I would also be appreciative if you share any additional anecdotal experience you may have with these hazards so that we can add some of that color to the document. The draft HIRA can be found here. Please provide any comments on the document using the comment collection tool, which can be found here. Please input all comments into this form no later than Friday, September 13. If you have any questions or have any issues accessing the document, please let me know. Also as a reminder, the Tidal Basin planners assigned to your communities should have sent the worksheet out to each community this week to develop each community’s mitigation strategy. This information is also due no later than Friday, September 13. Please let us know if we can provide any assistance as you develop your updated mitigation strategy. I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:mmontain@sbmfire.org; Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Subject:RE: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Date:Friday, September 6, 2024 11:39:00 AM Attachments:image001.png image004.jpg image005.jpg Good afternoon, and happy Friday! This email serves as a reminder of some deadlines coming up next Friday, September 13th: The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) is available for review and comment. Please scroll down to see the links and information for the HIRA, or reference the original email sent Friday, August 30. Updated community hazard mitigation strategy information is also due next Friday. Each community received a specific email tailored to their community, sent Wednesday, August 28. As a reminder, Tidal Basin staff are available to provide support to each community in developing mitigation strategies if needed. Thank you and have a great weekend. Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From: Kyle Karsjen Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 2:27 PM Subject: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Good afternoon, and happy long weekend! The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) for Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update is ready for review and comment. This draft represents our first stab at reviewing Ramsey County’s hazards and their potential impacts on the community. The draft also includes an initial hazard prioritization based on three factors – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Please note that you have direct control over everything in the HIRA – please provide me any feedback on where we may have gotten something wrong on hazards, or other edits we can make. As you read through the document, I would also be appreciative if you share any additional anecdotal experience you may have with these hazards so that we can add some of that color to the document. The draft HIRA can be found here. Please provide any comments on the document using the comment collection tool, which can be found here. Please input all comments into this form no later than Friday, September 13. If you have any questions or have any issues accessing the document, please let me know. Also as a reminder, the Tidal Basin planners assigned to your communities should have sent the worksheet out to each community this week to develop each community’s mitigation strategy. This information is also due no later than Friday, September 13. Please let us know if we can provide any assistance as you develop your updated mitigation strategy. I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:mmontain@sbmfire.org; Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Subject:RE: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Date:Thursday, September 12, 2024 8:47:00 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.jpg image003.jpg Good morning! Thank you to those communities who have already sent in their updated strategies, and those communities who have met with us this week to further discuss mitigation action planning. This email serves as a final reminder of some deadlines coming up tomorrow, September 13th: The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) is available for review and comment. Please scroll down to see the links and information for the HIRA, or reference the original email sent Friday, August 30. Updated community hazard mitigation strategy information is also due next Friday. Each community received a specific email tailored to their community, sent Wednesday, August 28. As a reminder, Tidal Basin staff are available to provide support to each community in developing mitigation strategies if needed. Thank you! Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From: Kyle Karsjen Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 2:27 PM Subject: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Good afternoon, and happy long weekend! The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) for Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update is ready for review and comment. This draft represents our first stab at reviewing Ramsey County’s hazards and their potential impacts on the community. The draft also includes an initial hazard prioritization based on three factors – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Please note that you have direct control over everything in the HIRA – please provide me any feedback on where we may have gotten something wrong on hazards, or other edits we can make. As you read through the document, I would also be appreciative if you share any additional anecdotal experience you may have with these hazards so that we can add some of that color to the document. The draft HIRA can be found here. Please provide any comments on the document using the comment collection tool, which can be found here. Please input all comments into this form no later than Friday, September 13. If you have any questions or have any issues accessing the document, please let me know. Also as a reminder, the Tidal Basin planners assigned to your communities should have sent the worksheet out to each community this week to develop each community’s mitigation strategy. This information is also due no later than Friday, September 13. Please let us know if we can provide any assistance as you develop your updated mitigation strategy. I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas; Christopher Hearden; Jim Lindner Subject:Ramsey County DRAFT Hazard Mitigation Plan for Review - Due Wednesday, October 30 Date:Wednesday, October 16, 2024 12:13:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image004.jpg Good morning! As you know, Ramsey County and its communities have been participating in an update of the county’s hazard mitigation plan. Thank you to everyone who has participated – attending meetings, providing information, updating your hazard mitigation strategies and other actions that have contributed to plan development. We are pleased to share the first full draft of the updated hazard mitigation plan with the Local Planning Team (LPT) and provide a final opportunity for community review and comment. Please read this whole email, as it is each community’s last opportunity to provide review and input on the draft plan before finalization. We ask that communities review two separate documents: Base Plan Hazard mitigation strategy (you only need to review for your community) The deadline for these reviews is no later than 4 PM CT, Wednesday October 30. Base Plan The Base Plan document encompasses the main portions of the plan. It can be viewed here. The base plan includes: Section 1 Introduction and Planning Process Section 2 Community Profile and Capabilities Section 3 Risk Assessment Section 4 Hazard Mitigation Strategy Section 5 Plan Implementation and Maintenance You’ll notice a few areas still highlighted in yellow as you read through the document; these are areas where we are still collecting information through the process and will be finalized before the plan goes out for public review. You’ll also notice a few references to appendices; these will be developed with the final draft. Hazard Mitigation Strategy Thank you to each community that submitted updates to its hazard mitigation strategy. Please click this link to access it. It should open up an Excel file with the mitigation strategy for the plan compiled. You only need to review the actions for your community. The strategy contains each mitigation action identified though the update process. Please make sure you review your community’s strategy for accuracy. For most communities, we made some additional edits and added any information that was missing. We also filled in some of the prioritization for each action where it wasn’t provided. If you see anything that we did that you don’t agree with or want me to change, please let me know and I’m happy to do it. In addition to reviewing the document, please let me know if your community has any other hazard mitigation actions you would like to add. We didn’t get many new hazard mitigation actions added during the strategy update process, and we are asking communities to review and provide at least ONE new hazard mitigation action to its strategy if the community hasn’t done so already. There is still time to edit before we finalize the document and send it off to public review. If you’d like any additional support in identifying and adding actions, please let me know. Timeline and Next Steps Please complete a review of this documentation and submit any new mitigation actions no later than 4 PM CT, Wednesday October 30 . Send any feedback on your community information or the base plan to me at kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com. If you have any questions or would like support in adding any more hazard mitigation actions, please let me know. Also please let me know if you have any access issues with the folder and we’ll figure something else out. Once each community has completed its review, the document will go out for public review. We’ll ask for your help in sharing that document. I will send a separate email about that process soon. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:Mayer, Bryan L; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas; Christopher Hearden; Jim Lindner; Matt Montain Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Public Review Draft sharing information Date:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:00:00 AM Attachments:WinterHazardSurveyFlyer-final pdf.pdf social sharing text.docx hazardmitigation-socialmedia-Final.jpg image001.png image002.png Good morning! We are pleased to announce that the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) draft is now ready for public review. The review period will last until Sunday, December 22. We are asking communities to share the plan draft and opportunity to review using whatever mechanisms you would normally use to share important information. I have attached the following to this email: A flyer has been developed that can be shared that includes the embedded links to the plan and comment sheet (WinterHazardSurveyFlyer-final pdf). This flyer can be shared via email to any of your partners that you think would find value in reviewing the full HMP. If you share the survey via email, please cc me. We’ve developed some materials that can be used to develop a post on social media. I have attached the text that can be used (social sharing text); please ensure that the links transfer to the posting. I have also attached an image that can be used in your post if you wish as well (hazardmitigation-socialmedia-Final). Finally, the plan will be shared on the Ramsey County website and Ramsey County social media channels today. When you do share the document, please remember to send me screenshots of the posting so that I can include it in the plan. If you have any further questions, please let me know. Thanks! Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com ramseycounty.us Help shape the future of Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan. We need your input! Review the Plan Review the plan. Click the link: Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan – Public Review Draft Share Your Feedback Fill out a quick survey. Click the Link: Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan – Feedback Survey We’re updating the plan to find ways to protect our communities from hazards like flooding and severe winter storms. A draft is now ready for you to review and share your thoughts. 1 2 For more information about the hazard mitigation process, please contact: Ramsey County Emergency Management & Homeland Security (RCEMHS) (651) 266-1017 bryan.mayer@ramseycounty.us Español Hmoob Soomaali Oromoo Karen Back to List Help make Ramsey County safer – share yourinput Ramsey County wants to be ready for disasters and keep people and property safe. Natural disasters like tornadoes, flooding, blizzards, and ice storms can cause serious harm, including loss of life, property damage, and financial hardship. To prepare, we’ve created a Hazard Mitigation Plan to reduce the impact of these disasters. This plan looks at the most common hazards in our area, ranks them by how often they happen and how much damage they cause, and suggests ways to reduce the risks. Read the draft Hazard Mitigation Plan (PDF) Why your input matters We want this plan to reflect what’s important to the people who live and work in Ramsey County. Your experiences and ideas will help us create a plan that works for everyone. Provide your feedback We need your feedback to help us make Ramsey County safe! Share your thoughts by Dec. 22. Take the survey What’s the goal? Be prepared: Understand the risks and plan ahead.               •  Protect lives and property: Reduce the impact of disasters.  Home /News & Updates Residents Businesses Your Government  How do I...? 12/10/24, 3:09 PM Help make Ramsey County safer – share your input | Ramsey County https://www.ramseycounty.us/content/Hazard-Mitigation-Plan-feedback-2024 1/2               •  Build a stronger community: Help Ramsey County recover faster when disasters happen. Your input will make a big difference. Together, we can create a plan that keeps our community safe and prepared for the future. Posted on Tuesday, December 10, 2024 - 2:10 p.m. 12/10/24, 3:09 PM Help make Ramsey County safer – share your input | Ramsey County https://www.ramseycounty.us/content/Hazard-Mitigation-Plan-feedback-2024 2/2 Español Hmoob Soomaali Oromoo Karen Provide feedback on thedraft Hazard MitigationPlan Contact us In Ramsey County, both emergency management and homeland security are coordinated in a comprehensive program under the Ramsey County Emergency Management and Homeland Security department (RCEMHS). RCEMHS works with our local municipalities, neighboring counties in the metro region, private and nonprofit organizations, and state and federal partners to better prepare for, respond to and recover from incidents ranging from tornadoes to terrorism. In addition to coordinating and supporting our partner agencies, Ramsey County Emergency Management is committed to the preparedness of our whole community. This includes working with community groups and leaders, businesses and individuals across the diversity of Ramsey County to enhance our combined disaster resiliency from the ground up. Ramsey County's Emergency Management program was nationally- accredited by the Emergency Management Accreditation Program in 2017. Contact Us Emergency Management& Homeland Security 651-266-1020 Contact form Department information Connect with us RelatedResources Emergency Management & Homeland Security  (http://www.youtube.com/user/R  County and city Emergency Management contacts  Emergency Management 2017-2021 Program Strategic Plan (PDF)  Federal Emergency Management Agency (http://www.fema.gov/)  Minnesota Homeland Security and Emergency Management  Sign up for emergency notifications  Home /Your Government /Departments /Safety and Justice Residents Businesses Your Government  How do I...? 12/10/24, 3:11 PM Emergency Management & Homeland Security | Ramsey County https://www.ramseycounty.us/your-government/departments/safety-and-justice/emergency-management-homeland-security 1/4 We have been working with our communities to update the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan. We’re updating the plan to find ways to protect our communities from hazards like flooding and severe winter storms. Please review the draft and share your thoughts: Comments will be accepted through December 22. For more information about the hazard mitigation process, contact Ramsey County Emergency Management & Homeland Security (RCEMHS) at 651-266-1017 or bryan.mayer@ramseycounty.us. Foster resilience in Ramsey County through development of a community-wide culture of preparedness and the coordination of public safety efforts to prevent, plan for, respond to, mitigate and recover from all hazards, disasters and emergencies – whether natural or human-caused, accidental or intentional. Visit our get involved page for more information on our volunteering in disaster service.  Ramsey County Emergency Management and Homeland Security is responsible for the creation and maintenance of the county’s Emergency Operations Plan and Mitigation Plan.  Emergency Operations Plan The Ramsey County Emergency Operations Plan determines who is in charge under what situations and how the actions of all agencies participating in the response will be coordinated to ensure that people and property will be Review the draft plan (PDF) Share your feedback Mission Emergency Operations Plan and Mitigation Plan  12/10/24, 3:11 PM Emergency Management & Homeland Security | Ramsey County https://www.ramseycounty.us/your-government/departments/safety-and-justice/emergency-management-homeland-security 2/4 protected in the safest and most effective way possible. Ramsey County has a comprehensive, all-hazards countywide Emergency Operations Plan. The county and its cities all use and are signatories on the same plan, which is approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA (http://www.fema.gov/) ). The City of Saint Paul maintains its own Emergency Operations Plan that coordinates with the county plan. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan The Ramsey County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (PDF) identifies hazards in the county and how mitigation of those hazards is prioritized and coordinated. The Ramsey County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan was last updated in 2019 and is approved by FEMA. Emergency management reduces our community’s vulnerability to disasters and increases our ability to cope with them. Emergency management is often thought of as a cycle: Preparedness: planning, training, conducting drills and exercises, testing equipment and public education. Response: all of the actions immediately after a disaster taken to save lives, as well as activities to protect property and the environment from the effects of the disaster. Recovery: Returning a disaster-affected community to “normal” after a disaster, including financial recovery and rebuilding. Mitigation: reducing or removing disaster risks in the community. Homeland security (http://www.dhs.gov/)  involves working with all aspects of public safety - from the federal level to individual community members - to ensure the most comprehensive and coordinated approach to the protection of public safety from acts of terrorism. It includes identification of possible threats, prevention, efforts to lessen potential impacts and preparation for events related to terrorism.  About emergency management About homeland security 12/10/24, 3:11 PM Emergency Management & Homeland Security | Ramsey County https://www.ramseycounty.us/your-government/departments/safety-and-justice/emergency-management-homeland-security 3/4 Healthcare facilities looking for resources to meet the new requirements from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), please visit our CMS toolkit page. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) Toolkit Resources for healthcare facilities  12/10/24, 3:11 PM Emergency Management & Homeland Security | Ramsey County https://www.ramseycounty.us/your-government/departments/safety-and-justice/emergency-management-homeland-security 4/4 From:Kyle Karsjen Cc:Mayer, Bryan L Bcc:ryan.kelzenberg@co.anoka.mn.us; allison.strohl@co.washington.mn.us; kelly.miller@co.dakota.mn.us; eric.waage@co.hennepin.mn.us Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Available for Review Date:Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:00:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Good morning, Ramsey County is nearing completion toward updating its hazard mitigation plan. This plan identifies community capabilities, provides an assessment of risks to the county and its communities, and lays out community mitigation strategies that reduce risks posed by a variety of hazards. The plan must be updated and approved by FEMA every five years to keep it current and to maintain eligibility for mitigation grant assistance. The plan has been updated in accordance with FEMA’s updated hazard mitigation planning guidance and is anticipated to be submitted for FEMA approval by the end of the year. During the process, Ramsey County and its communities have reviewed capabilities, assessed levels of risk to specific hazards, and developed a comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy that builds on capabilities to buy down those risks. One of the key elements of the plan development process is inviting stakeholders to provide input during the planning process. You have been identified by Ramsey County as a key partner. The County invites you to provide any input or comment on the plan as they work through the final stages of development. We ask that you review the draft plan, which can be accessed here: Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan – Review Draft Please provide any feedback utilizing this link: Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan – Feedback Survey The plan will be available for stakeholder review and comment until December 22. More information about hazard mitigation and mitigation planning can be found at https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/risk-management/hazard-mitigation-planning. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com City of Gem Lake County of Ramsey State of Minnesota Resolution No. 2025-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE ADOPTING THE 2025 RAMSEY COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within the City of Gem Lake; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as the 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in the City of Gem Lake from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and WHEREAS, adoption by the City of Gem Lake demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota, that: Section 1. In accordance with (local rule for adopting resolutions), the City of Gem Lake adopts the 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan. While content related to (local government) may require revisions to meet the plan approval requirements, changes occurring after adoption will not require (local government) to re-adopt any further iterations of the plan. Subsequent plan updates following the approval period for this plan will require separate adoption resolutions. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced by Councilmember __________ and supported by Councilmember __________, and upon vote being taken thereon, the resolution passed with a vote of _____ in favor and _____ against. ATTEST I, Melissa Lawrence, the duly qualified Acting City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. March 18, 2025 Melissa Lawrence, Acting City Clerk Date The Ramsey County GIS Users Group Statement of Purpose Who is the Ramsey County GIS User Group? The Ramsey County GIS Users Group (RCGISUG) is an alliance and partnership of municipal governments and watershed management units who make use of Geographic Information Systems operating within Ramsey County, Minnesota. The RCGISUG was originally created as a 401(c)(3) in May of 1995 and established both a Joint Powers Agreement and cost-sharing process between itself and Ramsey County in Fall 1997. The User Group operates fully autonomously from Ramsey County, but partners with the County in a mutually beneficial, peer-to-peer relationship to leverage their shared talent, innovation, and fiscal resources. What are our goals and objectives? To provide a better service to the public by enabling elected officials and management the ability to make more informed decisions based on a wealth of public information which can be processed, analyzed, and displayed by GIS technology. To enhance members access to data, techniques, and knowledge to more efficiently and affordably than would be possible by individual effort. To contribute to the ongoing development and enhancement of the GIS data being maintained by all units of government operating in Ramsey County. To promote collaborative relationships through data and knowledge-sharing between organizations. To establish and maintain cost-sharing programs between organizations who wish to create and maintain enhanced GIS data. To cooperate and work effectively with metropolitan and regional organizations in the promotion of GIS technology. To ensure access to up-to-date and accurate geospatial data including parcel data, taxation and assessor information, socioeconomic data, aerial imagery, oblique imagery, LIDAR, contours, natural and constructed features including building outlines, street centerlines, trees, water, driveways, parking lots, and related data. To provide our organizations the ability to view and access data beyond their own boundaries and leverage the expertise of partner organization. To share geospatial data among all levels of government to assist them with their workflows. How does the User Group work and what does it cost? Two Joint Powers Agreements have been established, one between the Ramsey County GIS User Group Members and a second one between the RCGISUG and Ramsey County. These two Joint Power Agreements have the following purposes: • To facilitate cost sharing for imagery data that is needed by all levels of government, enabling the cities and watershed management units to benefit from the contracting, vendor selection and procurement work conducted by Ramsey County • To enable the members of the User Group to act and speak on behalf of their respective agency’s interest in matters relating to the creation, access, sharing and use of geospatial data. Funding: Each organization pays a one-time membership fee of $500. Annual fees will be levied each year with an organization committing to a three-year participation upon joining the group. The fee amount for an organization is based on the latest census population. Function: The User Group convenes quarterly to conduct its business, review projects and initiatives and engage with one another to promote its work. All User Group meetings are open to all public and private individuals and organizations. What have we achieved so far? Lead organization to introduce GIS knowledge and technology to government organization operating in Ramsey County government organizations. Received the Governor’s Geospatial Commendation Award in 2003. Integral organization in creating new countywide GIS datasets such as pathways, recreation facilities, address points, storm data. Created and maintained the first Ramsey County online mapping application in 2003 and assisted during the transition of the mapping site being managed by Ramsey County on behalf of all users in 2012. Provided funds for an intern to work on the Ramsey County parcel rectification. Provided resources for members to attend various training sessions including the ESRI annual conference. Provided ongoing training and educational opportunities at quarterly meetings. Contracted to get multiple sets of countywide historical aerial imagery photos going back to 1940 scanned for digital use. Acquired high-quality/high-resolution impervious surface dataset in 2016. Provided initial access to new imagery and imagery software: Pictometry/Eagleview in 2008 and NearMap in 2018. Participated in the cost sharing of updated LIDAR data in 2022. This will provide updated topographic contour information. Committed partnership and resources with Ramsey County for ongoing imagery resources through 2026. Contact Info for the Ramsey County GIS Users Group: Jolinda Stapleton (Current Chair), Jolinda.stapleton@cityofroseville.com, 651-792-7044 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AMONG MEMBERS OF THE RAMSEY COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS USERS GROUP This JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. §471.59 among Governmental Units for the purposes of forming the Ramsey County Geographic Information System Users Group (“Users Group”). ARTICLE I. INTENT OF THIS AGREEMENT In 1995, an informal alliance, known as the Ramsey County Geographic Information System Users Group (“Users Group”), was formed among Governmental Units interested in using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and data created and maintained by Ramsey County. This agreement is intended to establish and enable the Users Group to represent the parties to this Agreement for the purposes of undertaking negotiations and transactions. ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS Section 1. Members means those Governmental Units that have executed this Joint Powers Agreement and have paid the annual membership dues as provided in Article X. Section 2. Governmental Unit has the meaning set forth in Minnesota Statutes §471.59. Section 3. Users Group means a group made up of one representative of each Member with the powers and responsibilities described in this Agreement. ARTICLE III. GIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRUCTURE Section 1. There is hereby created a GIS Board of Directors (Board). Section 2. Each Member shall appoint one person to serve as a Director. Each Member may also appoint a person to serve as an Alternate Director. Members shall notify the Board in writing if the Director or Alternate Director changes. Section 3. The Board shall have the following officers: a Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer (Officers). Section 4. All Officers will be elected by the Board in the first meeting of the agreement’s term as identified in Article X. Section 1. The Chair will be elected to a one-year term. The Vice-chair will be elected as Vice-chair in year one and Chair in year two. The Secretary will be elected annually for a three year term in which they will serve as Secretary in year one, Vice- chair in year two, and Chair in year three. The Treasurer will be elected by the Board for a five year term coinciding with the term of this agreement. Any Officer vacancies will be elected by the Board as-needed. Section 5. The Officers shall serve on a voluntary basis without pay. Section 6. A quorum will consist of at least 40% of the full membership of the Board, whether or not all vacancies have been filled. Section 7. Decisions of the Board will be made by a majority of the quorum. Directors may vote and participate in all meeting proceedings from a remote site pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.02. ARTICLE IV. DUTIES OF THE GIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. The Board shall meet at least two times per year. Section 2. The Board shall approve and adopt the formula for the Users Group member dues annually by December 31 for the following year. Section 3. The Board shall arrange for and facilitate regular meetings of the Users Group and for Users Group activities. Meetings shall be held in accordance with Minnesota Statute 13D.01 . Section 4. The Chair presides at Users Group meetings. The Vice Chair will preside in the absence of the Chair. The Secretary is responsible for recording the proceedings of the Board and communicating these proceedings to all Member organizations. The Treasurer is responsible for the funds and financial records of the Board. Section 5. The Chair and the Treasurer must sign vouchers or orders disbursing funds of the Users Group. Disbursement will be made in the method prescribed by law for statutory cities. Section 6. The Board may take such actions as it deems necessary and convenient to accomplish the general purposes of this Agreement. Section 7.The Board shall purchase liability insurance on behalf of the Users Group to insure against liability of the Users Group and its constituent Members. Section 8. The Board may: (i) Enter into contracts to carry out its powers and duties, in full compliance with any competitive bidding requirements imposed by State or local law; (ii) Provide for the prosecution, defense, or other participation in proceedings at law or in equity in which it may have an interest; (iii) Employ such persons as it deems necessary on a part-time, full-time, or consultancy basis; (iv) Purchase, hold, or dispose of real and personal property; (v) Contract for space, commodities or personal services with a Member or group of Members; (vi) Accept gifts, apply for and use grants or loans of money or other property from the state, the United States of America, and from other government units and may enter into agreements in connection therewith and hold, use and dispose of such money or property in accordance with the terms of the gift, grant, loan or agreement relating thereto; (vii) Appoint a fiscal agent. ARTICLE V. NEW MEMBERS Section 1. Any Governmental Unit that is not a party to the initial Agreement may join as a Member at any time. Section 2. To become a Member, a local unit of government shall adopt a resolution and shall sign this Joint Powers Agreement. Section 3. New Members will pay the annual membership dues for the year in which the new Member is joining, as set by the Board pursuant to Article IV, Section 2, as calculated by the current formula. Fees will not be pro-rated for new Members who join after January 1 of each year. ARTICLE VI. GIS DATA TO BE EXCHANGED AS PART OF THIS AGREEMENT Section 1. Members agree to exchange any GIS data with Ramsey County and with any requesting Member for the requesting party’s own use where that GIS data has been in some way derived and/or developed from the County GIS Data accessed through this Agreement or future agreements between the Users Group and Ramsey County. Members agree to exchange with Ramsey County and with any other Member any attribute data that it has created and maintained where that data can be associated to a parcel using a parcel identifier. Members also agree to exchange any building permit data requested by Ramsey County for the identification of future physical feature data base updates. Section 2. The Board will negotiate with Ramsey County on behalf of the Members in all matters deemed necessary relating to supply of GIS data generated by a Member. ARTICLE VII. DATA ACCESS AND USAGE Section 1. All Members shall have equal rights to access Ramsey County GIS Data. Section 2. Data generated by Ramsey County and provided to Members may not be sold in its original form to third party agencies. However, a Member may allow use of the original data by a third party for specific contracted purposes. Section 3. Data which results from enhancement of Ramsey County GIS Data by a Member, received pursuant to this Agreement, may be made available to a third party. Section 4. All Members will adhere to future Users Group license agreements for County or other agency GIS data. ARTICLE VIII. DATA SECURITY All Members agree to abide by the data privacy and data security standards of the Member when using Ramsey County GIS Data or any derivative or enhancement of the data. ARTICLE IX. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 1. The fiscal year of the Users Group is the calendar year. Section 2. The Board shall adopt an annual budget prior to December 31 of each year for each succeeding year. The Board will give an opportunity to each Member to comment or object to the proposed budget before adoption. Notice of the adopted budget must be distributed promptly thereafter to the appointed Director of each Member. Section 3. Operational costs shall be shared according to a method agreed upon by majority decision of the Board of Directors. The costs could be met by membership dues. These costs could include Users Group administrative costs, purchase of liability insurance, and others as appropriate. Section 4. Annual Membership Dues: Members shall commit to payment of Annual Membership Dues, except where limited by State Statutes. Section 5. Billings to the Members are due and payable no later than 60 days after the receipt of the invoice. In the event of a dispute as to the amount of a billing, a Member must nevertheless make payment as billed to preserve membership status. The Member may make payment subject to its right to dispute the bill and exercise any remedies available to it. Failure to pay a billing within 60 days results in suspension of voting privileges of the Member Director. Failure to pay a billing within 120 days is grounds for termination of membership, but the Users Group’s right to receive payment survives termination of membership. ARTICLE X. TERM Section 1. The Term of this Agreement is January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2030. Section 2. Based on the annual review of the operating procedures within the Agreement conducted by the Board, a new Agreement will be developed and circulated at least three months prior to December 31, 2030 and be agreed upon and signed on or before December 31, 2030. ARTICLE XI. TERMINATION Each Member shall have the right to terminate its membership and participation in the Users Group by formal resolution of the Member’s organization and communicated to the Board in writing. However, the Member is still obligated to its financial commitments for the year during which termination of membership occurs. These commitments include: (i) Any balance of the Annual Membership Dues. This commitment applies to all Members; (ii) Any balance owing on Special Projects Assessments. This commitment applies to Members which have entered into any special project agreement(s). ARTICLE XII. DISSOLUTION Section 1. The Users Group may be dissolved by a two-thirds vote of its Members in good standing. Dissolution is mandatory when the Secretary has received certified copies of resolutions adopted by the governing bodies of the required number of Members requesting dissolution. Section 2. In the event of a dissolution, the Board must determine the measures necessary to effect the dissolution and must provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and law. Section 3. In the event of dissolution, following the payment of all outstanding obligations, assets of the Users Group will be distributed among the then existing Members in direct proportion to their cumulative annual contributions. If those obligations exceed the assets of the Users Group, the net deficit of the Users Group will be charged to and paid by the then existing Members in direct proportion to their cumulative annual contributions. ARTICLE XIII. ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS Until the expiration of six years after this Agreement terminates, the Users Group shall make available to the Member organizations and to the State Auditor, a copy of this Agreement and books, documents, accounting procedures and practices of the Users Group relating to this Agreement. ARTICLE XIV. HOLD HARMLESS Section 1. Each Member agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the other Members harmless from any claims, demands, actions or causes of action, including reasonable attorney’s fees, against or incurred by such other Members, for injury to, death of, or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising out of any act or omission on the part of the indemnifying Member or any of its agents, servants or employees in the performance of or with relation to any of the work or services provided by Members under the terms of this Agreement. Section 2. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver by any Member, the Users Group of any limitation of liability under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, or other statutory or common law immunities, limits, or exceptions on liability. Section3. Under no circumstances, however, shall a Member be required to pay on behalf of itself and other Members, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one Member. The limits of liability for some or all of the Members may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for any Member. ARTICLE XV. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Members and the Users Group agree to comply with all federal, state, and local laws, resolutions, ordinances, rules, regulations, and executive orders pertaining to unlawful discrimination on account of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, sexual preference, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, or age. ARTICLE XVI. DATA PRACTICES Section 1. All data collected, created, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of either the Member’s or the Users Group’s performance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, and rules adopted to implement the Act. Section 2. The Members and the Users Group agree to abide strictly by these statutes, rules, and regulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on this ____ day of ___________, 2025. ORGANIZATION _________________________ Approved: By:___________________________________________________ ( Name, Title ) (Mayor/Board of Managers President) By:___________________________________________________ ( Name, Title ) (City Manager/Administrator) DESIGNATED DIRECTOR TO REPRESENT ORGANIZATION: Name:_ Phone:_ ______________________ Email:_ ______________ ALTERNATE DIRECTOR (IF APPLICABLE): Name:____________________________________ Phone:____________________________________ Email:____________________________________ By:___________________________________________________ (Chris Kucek, Chair of Users Group) City of Gem Lake County of Ramsey State of Minnesota Resolution No. 2025-010 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE 2026- 2030 RAMSEY COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM USERS GROUP (RCGISUG). WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake desires to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Ramsey County Geographic Information System Users Group (RCGISUG) to use the Geographic Information System (GIS) and data created and maintained by Ramsey County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota, that it should and hereby does approve a Joint Powers Agreement for the 2026-2030 Ramsey County Geographic Information System Users Group (RCGISUG). The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced by Councilmember __________ and supported by Councilmember __________, and upon vote being taken thereon, the resolution passed with a vote of _____ in favor and _____ against. ATTEST I, Melissa Lawrence, the duly qualified Acting City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. March 18, 2025 Melissa Lawrence, Acting City Clerk Date Two OaksResponsible Service Site:   pete.tholen@whitebeartownship.orgCustomer Email: Customer Phone:  1 Sub Total 2,325.00 Total $2,325.00 Estimate Date :February 18, 2025 Reference# :2025 IPM 5BH Sales person :Rebecca Charles Project Name :Gem Lake 2025 IPM Is Project Prevailing Wage? :No Prairie Restorations Tax ID : 41-1292279 31646 128th Street Northwest Princeton, Minnesota 55371 Estimate # EST-006072 Bill To Gem Lake City (White Bear) 1283 Hammond Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 Ship To Gem Lake City (White Bear) 55 Summit Farm Lane Gem Lake, MN, 55110 # Item & Description Qty Rate Amount Summer 2025 1 Service Overspray To manage invasive or aggressive species including yellow mustard and volunteer trees. 1.00 725.00 725.00 2 Service Integrated Plant Management 1-2 visits to manage invasive species through herbicidal or mechanical means. 2.00 800.00 1,600.00 Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI Prairie Restorations, Inc. has been committed to restoring and managing native plant communities for over 45 years. During this time, we have partnered with thousands of clients on a diverse array of projects spanning both the public and private sectors across the Midwest. Our team is comprised of experienced professionals with diverse backgrounds in biology, forestry, natural resources, and beyond. Their expertise and dedication ensure we provide exceptional service at every stage, from consulting and design to installation and management. We are deeply committed to protecting and enhancing our natural ecosystems, bringing steadfast dedication and proven expertise to every project since 1977. We appreciate the opportunity to collaborate with you and look forward to making an impact together. ~ Your PRI Services Team ABOUT US Our Mission is to produce the most ecologically appropriate seeds, plants products, and services and to utilize them to restore and manage native plant communities. Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI Princeton, MN (HQ, Services, Retail, Production) Scandia, MN *Your Service Site* (Services, Retail) Watertown, MN (Services) Randolph, MN (Services) Esko, MN (Services, Retail, Production) With multiple locations across Minnesota, we are well-equipped to serve projects throughout the state and surrounding regions. Additionally, our garden centers in Princeton and Scandia, MN, are open to the public, offering multitudes of resources, inspiration, seed and plants for native landscaping. We are dedicated to delivering exceptional service and cultivating strong, lasting connections within the communities we serve. Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI Management Overview 1. The Benefits: Managing your native planting will help give the project the best opportunity for long-term success while fostering essential habitats for songbirds, butterflies, bees, and other pollinators. Native plantings play a key role in carbon sequestration, storing carbon in their biomass and roots. They also improve water quality by filtering out pollutants and excess nutrients, aiding in stormwater purification. Moreover, native landscapes restore soils by promoting biodiversity, preventing erosion, and enhancing soil structure and nutrient cycling, resulting in healthier, more resilient ecosystems. 2. After Seeding: During the establishment period, Prairie Restorations will mow the project area to control the growth of annual weeds. Mowing will reduce competition and support the growth of prairie seedlings. Mowing will also be conducted to reduce weed seed spread. The recommended cutting height is typically between 4 and 6 inches, with clippings finely mulched to prevent smothering. Native landscapes focus on their root growth the first year, reaching full growth around 3-5 years of age. 3. Regular Management: In the years following the establishment period, Prairie Restorations will implement Integrated Plant Management (IPM) services to control annual, biennial, and perennial weeds within the developing native landscape. IPM services will include but are not limited to; spot herbicide spraying, spot mowing, herbicide wicking, or hand weeding. These services are billed on a per- visit basis, with costs agreed upon prior to the start of the growing season. 4. Prescribed Burn: Prairie Restorations recommends prescribed burning every 3-5 years to stimulate the growth of native species and deter the spread of non-native or woody species. Prescribed burning is a highly effective tool for managing your project site and is scheduled as the project matures. This service will be provided as a separate lump-sum cost, and is generally conducted during the spring, when native species are dormant. 5. Dormant Mowing: In lieu of burning, or in years when burning is not performed, Prairie Restorations will carry out Spring Dormant Mowing to clear the previous year’s growth and prepare the site for the new growing season. This will take place early in the spring, as conditions allow. Spring Dormant Mowing will be provided as a separate lump-sum cost. Vegetation Management and Project Follow-up: Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI Before each growing season, you may receive a specified quote from your project manager detailing the recommended management strategies and associated costs for your project. Your Management Project 1. Monitoring – Essential for successful native planting, periodic monitoring informs our management techniques by helping us understand the needs of your project. 2. Integrated Plant Management (IPM) – IPM is our comprehensive approach to controlling undesirable species while nurturing native plant growth. We employ a range of techniques like spot mowing, spot herbicide applications, hand weeding, and herbicide wicking, to effectively manage your landscape. Terms & Conditions By signing this contract, you agree to the terms and conditions stated below. Project Cost: The customer agrees to the entire project cost as outlined in the Estimate provided by Prairie Restorations, Inc. The amount detailed in this estimate represents the full and final cost for the project unless adjustments are agreed upon as outlined in the "Price Variance" provision. By signing this agreement, the customer acknowledges and accepts the entire scope and cost of the project as stated in Estimate. Entire Agreement: This agreement represents the entire understanding between the parties and supersedes any previous communication or agreements that may exist. Acknowledgment of Terms: Each party acknowledges that they have read this agreement, understand the terms of this agreement, and have signed this agreement voluntarily. Amendment: This agreement can be amended only by a written document signed by both parties. Force Majeure: Prairie Restorations, Inc. shall not be liable for any failure of, or delay in, the performance of this agreement for the period that such failure or delay is beyond the reasonable control of Prairie Restorations, Inc. and could not reasonably have been foreseen or provided against. These occurrences include but are not limited to weather, drought, wildlife, etc. Governing Law: This agreement shall be governed, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. Waiver: Failure or neglect to enforce any rights under this agreement does not construe an agreement to waive any right in the future. A waiver or extension is only effective if it is in writing and signed by the party granting it. No single or partial exercise of any right or remedy will preclude any other or further exercise of any right or remedy. Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI Late Payments: Any amount not paid when due will bear interest from the due date until paid at a rate equal to [1]% per month ([12.68]% annually) or the maximum allowed by Law, whichever is less. Severability: If any part of this agreement is declared unenforceable or invalid, the remainder will continue to be valid and enforceable. Markings & Flagging: The customer agrees to indemnify Prairie Restorations, Inc. for any damages to property caused by improper or no marking or flagging of necessary areas (i.e. septic tank, gutters, etc.). The customer is responsible for marking or flagging any areas that may be vulnerable to damage from Prairie Restorations' equipment in a manner visible to our team. The client will also communicate any potential obstructions to Prairie Restorations, Inc. to avoid damage. Change Order: If changes to the project scope are requested by the customer or become necessary due to unforeseen conditions, Prairie Restorations will issue a written change order detailing the proposed modifications and any associated adjustments to the project cost or timeline. No changes will be implemented without prior consultation and the property owner’s written approval of the change order. Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI Price Variance: Customer agrees that they have fully disclosed the full project scope including but not limited to project areas and dimensions, existing vegetation, prior site history, and any other relevant in formation. a. If a situation or condition arises that materially impacts the execution or pricing of this agreement and was not disclosed to Prairie Restorations prior to this agreement, the customer understands that this contract may become void. In such cases, the contract may be amended, or a new proposal may be issued, as appropriate. b. The customer agrees to indemnify and hold Prairie Restorations, Inc. harmless from any liability resulting from property damages caused by the customer's omission or failure to provide necessary information. Burning Liability Disclaimer: It is the responsibility of the property owner to visibly mark and notify the crew of any objects in the burn area that need to be protected. Prairie Restorations will not be held liable for any damage to property that was not marked appropriately. • Objects will be marked at a height to be seen above vegetation and visible from our equipment, • Potential obstacle/hazard items include but are not limited to: Underground or above-ground fencing Electrical boxes Irrigation nozzles Septic caps Drainage culverts Lights or other man-made installations Landscaping Decorative rock Ornamental plants Trees and shrubs While Prairie Restorations will make every effort to protect all identified trees and shrubs within, and surrounding the burn unit, it may be unavoidable to protect some trees from temporary cosmetic damage. Prairie Restorations will not be responsible for any damage that occurs if the landowner mows their own burn breaks. Due to the sensitivity of fire, burns will be conducted only when environmental conditions are feasible and safe. Conditions affecting burns include but are not limited to relative humidity, wind direction and speed, soil moisture, rain, and current vegetation type. Spring Prescribed Burns are conducted generally during March-May. Estimate #: 006072 Proposal Validity: This proposal is valid for 30 days from the date of the proposal. Customer Name Customer Signature Date Salesperson Name Salesperson Signature Date Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI Sfcfddb!Dibsmft Gfc!2:!3136!24;22!DTU Thank you for trusting us with your restoration project. 31646 128th Street Princeton, MN 55371 Sales@PrairieResto.com www.prairieresto.com 763-389-4342 Zoho Sign Document ID: 2EF40FD4-LOSWGWZZOCX4QYVUCHAFOWSBDSIHNRZYLS8IBVWWKBI 1 / 1 ESTIMATE-000538 Estimate From Lucas and Adams Electrical Contractor, LLC 7960 Demontreville Trail North Lake Elmo, MN 55042, US Phone/Mobile: 651-332-1087 E-mail: adamsoine@gmail.com Web: lucasadamselectric.com Client Gretchen Artig-Swomley 1430 Goose Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4121, US Action 2/2/25 Due 2/2/25 Number ESTIMATE-000538 Gem Lake City Hall standby generator and auto transfer switch install Qty Unit Unit Price Net Gross *48KW commercial grade liquid cooled 120/208 volt 3 phase generator (Supplied and installed) 1 Each $39 050 $39 050 $39 050 400 amp automatic transfer switch (Supplied and installed) 1 Each $13 750 $13 750 $13 750 Total: $52 800 *Requires 55”x110”x6” concrete pad and Natural Gas supply line. Both supplied and installed by others. 4815 White Bear Parkway • St. Paul, MN 55110 • Phone 651.771.1000 4175 123rd Street • Eau Claire, WI 54729 • Phone 715.831.8752 March 18, 2025 Melissa Lawerence C/O City of Gem Lake 4200 Otter Lake Rd. Gem Lake, MN. 55110 RE: Generator Installation We propose to furnish and install all labor, material and permit fees to perform the following electrical installation at the above location. Electrical work is to be done in accordance with local and national electrical codes governing such. General Clarifications: • All work to be done during normal business hours 7am-3:15pm M-F • Utility Fees are not included • Generator to be located within 50ft of the CT can • Initial diesel fill included • Generator lead time of 26 to 36 weeks after release • Aluminum conductors for feeders • Tax included 45-KVA Option – 100 amps for building operations Included: • 45-KVA 3-Phase Natural Gas Generator • 400-amp Nema 3R service rated Automatic Transfer Switch. • Include Saw-Cutting & Replacement of Concrete Sidewalk to Allow for Conduit Run to Generator. • Supply & Install Concrete Pad for Generator • Rework Existing Electrical Panel to be fed from transfer switch • Supply Permit & Inspection. • Locates Exclusions: • Painting • Premium time • Utility fee’s • Site restoration beyond leveling and seeding Total Cost 45-KVA Generator: $77,900.00 Breakout Pricing Total Cost 45-KVA Generator: $77,900.00 Generator package with ATS and with set in place $32,400.00 Materials $12,350.00 Tax $4,450 Gas hook up $3,500.00 Labor $20,500.00 Rental Equipment $800.00 Concrete Pad $2,900.00 Site Restoration $1,000.00 Thank you for the opportunity to provide this estimate. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 651-287-3139. Connect with the Best … Connect with NEI Electric Regards, John Muehlbauer, Project Manager NEI Electric . 4815 White Bear Pkwy . St Paul, MN 55110 651.287.3139 direct . 763.898.8808 . cell 651.771.1000 office . 651.771.9119 . fax jmuehlbauer@neielectric.com . www.neielectric.com ©2015 Cummins Inc. | NAS-5778d-EN (4/15) power.cummins.com Specification sheet Quiet ConnectTM Series RS40 Features and benefits Robust product design and testing - The generator is designed to operate under extreme environmental conditions including cold weather starts at as low as -40 oF. The generator is tested and certified per the latest EPA, UL and IBC Seismic standards and is capable of meeting NFPA110 requirements when equipped with the necessary accessories and properly installed. Flexible Exercise mode - The innovative, flexible exercise mode enables the generator to exercise at a time, frequency and duration that suits the customer's preference - as little as 2 minutes every 6 months - reducing unnecessary fuel consumption, emissions and noise. Advanced Enclosure Design - The aesthetically appealing enclosure incorporates special designs that deliver the quietest generator of its kind. Aluminum material plus durable powder coat paint provides the best anti-corrosion performance. The generator set enclosure has been evaluated to withstand 180 MPH wind loads in accordance with ASCE7-10. The intelligent design has removable panels and service doors to provide easy access for service and maintenance. Self diagnostics and easy service - The generator is equipped with Cummins PowerCommand electronic control to provide industry-leading self diagnostic capabilities. In addition, critical components of the generator are designed to ensure service and preventive maintenance can be completed in a short period of time. Weight, size and sound level Weight: 1356 lbs (615 kg) Size: Length 94 in (2388 mm), width 34 in (864 mm), height 45.5 in (1156 mm) Sound: 63 dB(A) at 23 ft (7 m) with sound level 2 enclosure Series Model Phase Voltage (V) Frequency (Hz) Rated amps1 (NG/LPV fuel) Circuit breaker (Amps) RS40 C40 N6 1 120/240 60 166.7/166.7 200 3 120/208 60 138.8/138.8 175 3 120/240 60 120.4/120.4 150 3 277/480 60 60.2/60.2 80 ¹ Derating guidelines: Engine power available up to 114m (375 ft) at ambient temperatures up to 40 °C (104 °F). Above these elevations derate at 4% per 305m (1000 ft) and 2% per 10 °C above 40 °C (104 °F). ©2015 Cummins Inc. | NAS-5778d-EN (4/15) power.cummins.com Product features Engine  Natural gas/propane 1800 rpm engine  Engine air cleaner – normal duty  Electronic governor, isochronous  Engine starter, 12 VDC motor  Shutdown – low oil pressure  Extension – oil drain  Engine oil Fuel System  Single fuel – natural gas or propane vapor, field selectable Alternator  60 Hz, 1 phase, 4 lead, or 3 phase, 12 lead, 120 oC temperature rise at 40 oC ambient  Exciter/voltage regulator – torque match Control  PowerCommand 1.1  Display language – English  Control mounting, right facing Electrical  Single circuit breaker, UL certified, right-side mounted  Battery charging alternator, normal duty  Battery charger – 6 Amp, regulated Cooling  Generator set cooling capability – 50 oC  Shutdown – low coolant level  Engine coolant – 50/50 mixture  Extension – coolant drain Enclosure  Aluminum enclosure Sound Level 1 with muffler installed, sandstone color  Wind rating – 180 MPH Code compliance  UL 2200  EPA emissions, emergency, stationary, 40CFR60  IBC Seismic  NFPA110 capable Generator set application  Coolant heater  Crank case vent heater  Large battery rack  Flexible fuel line  Literature (English) – operator’s manual, installation quick guide and manual, service manual Warranty  Base warranty – 2 year standby  Extended warranties available Packaging  Shipping pallet, poly bag Generator set performance Governor regulation class: ISO 8528 Part 1 Class G3 Voltage regulation, no load to full load: ±1.0% Random voltage variation: ±1.0% Frequency regulation: Isochronous Random frequency variation: ± 0.25% @ 60 Hz Radio frequency emissions compliance: FCC code Title 47 part 15 Class B Engine Design: Turbo with after cooler Bore: 86.5 mm (3.4 in) Stroke: 100.0 mm (3.94 in) Displacement: 2.4 liters (143.5 in3) Cylinder block: Cast iron, in-line 4 cylinder Battery capacity: 550 amps at ambient temperature of 0 oF to 32 oF (-18 oC to 0 oC) Battery charging alternator: 50 amps Starting voltage: 12 volt, negative ground Lube oil filter type(s): Spin-on with relief valve Standard cooling system: 50o C (122o F) ambient cooling system Rated speed: 1800 rpm Fuel supply pressure Minimum fuel supply pressure, kPa (in H2O): 1.5 (6.0) Maximum fuel supply pressure, kPa (in H2O): 3.5 (14.0) Control system The PowerCommand® electronic control is standard equipment and provides total generator set system integration including automatic remote starting/stopping, precise frequency and voltage regulation, alarm and status message display, output metering, auto-shutdown at fault detection and NFPA 110 Level 1 compliance. Sound attenuated enclosure The aesthetically appealing enclosure incorporates special designs that deliver the quietest generator of its kind. Aluminum material plus durable powder coat paint provides the best anti-corrosion performance. The generator set enclosure has been evaluated to withstand 180 MPH wind loads in accordance with ASCE7-10. The intelligent design has removable panels and service doors to provide easy access for service and maintenance. ©2015 Cummins Inc. | NAS-5778d-EN (4/15) power.cummins.com Average fuel consumption Fuel consumption – natural gas Fuel consumption – LP vapor Load: 1/4 1/2 3/4 Full Load: 1/4 1/2 3/4 Full Ft3/hr: 209.5 304.7 409.5 519.0 Ft3/hr: 83.0 121.7 166.0 193.6 M3/hr: 5.9 8.5 11.5 14.5 M3/hr: 2.3 3.4 4.6 5.4 Gal/hr 2.3 3.4 4.6 5.4 Easy service and installation Customer Access Door Removable Service Door Oil Fill Circuit Breaker Display Natural Gas/Liquid Propane Fuel Connection Oil Check Air Cleaner Coolant Fill Conversion factor: 8.58 ft³ = 1 lb 0.535m³ = 1 kg 36.39 ft³ = 1 gal ©2015 Cummins Inc. | NAS-5778d-EN (4/15) power.cummins.com Basic dimensions Note: This outline drawing is provided for general reference only and is not intended for use in design or installation. For more information, see Operators and Installation manuals or contact your distributor or dealer for assistance. Automatic transfer panel configurations Typical service entrance ATS model installation (100/200A) Typical non-service entrance ATS model installation (100/200A) Dedicated emergency standby service system (100/200A) ©2015 Cummins Inc. | NAS-5778d-EN (4/15) power.cummins.com 100A RA Series Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) Non-service entrance 200A RA Series Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) Non-service entrance 100A and 200A RA Series Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) Service entrance North America 1400 73rd Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55432 USA Phone 763 574 5000 Fax 763 574 5298 ©2015 Cummins Inc. All rights reserved. Cummins is a registered trademark of Cummins Inc. “Our energy working for you.” is a trademark of Cummins Power Generation. Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others. Specifications are subject to change without notice. NAS-5778d-EN (4/15) power.cummins.com Accessories Transfer switch (sold separately)  HMI211RS in-home display, including pre-configured 12” harness  HMI211 remote display, including pre-configured 12” harness  HMI220 remote display  Auxiliary output relays (2)  Auxiliary configurable signal inputs (8) and relay outputs (8)  Annunciator – RS485  Internet monitoring device – PowerCommand 500  Battery chargers – stand-alone, 12V  Enclosure Sound Level 1 to Sound Level 2 upgrade kit  Enclosure paint touch up kit  Base barrier – elevated generator set  Alternator heater  Maintenance and service kit  Engine lift kit Automatic Transfer Switches available in various amperages.  Service Entrance models are also available, which helps reduce the installation cost.  All models UL listed to UL 1008 standard.  Available for both Indoor and Outdoor applications.  Compatibility with Cummins generator set helps reduce the installation time for the complete application. Warranty policy The Cummins RS and RX liquid cooled generator set models come with a 2 year base warranty when used in EPA-Stationary Emergency application. The RA series Automatic Transfer Switches come with a 2 year base warranty. Extended warranty options are available. Please contact Cummins dealers/distributors for details. After sale support Largest distributor/dealer support network Cummins Power Generation generator sets are supported by the largest and best trained worldwide certified distributor/dealer network in the industry. The network of knowledgeable and highly trained dealers will help you select the right generator for your application and advise you on associated accessories for your generator. The dealer network can also help answer any questions you may have regarding operation and maintenances requirements of the generators. This same network offers a complete selection of commonly used generator set maintenance parts, manuals and specification sheets. Manuals: Operation and installation manuals ship with the generator set. To obtain additional copies or other manuals for this model, see your distributor/dealer. To easily locate the nearest certified distributor/dealer for Cummins generators in your area, or for more information, contact us at 1-800-344-0039 or visit power.cummins.com. Contact your distributor/dealer for more information. WARNING: ! Standby rating based on: Applicable for supplying emergency power for the duration of normal power interruption. No sustained overload capability is available for this rating. (Equivalent to fuel stop power in accordance with ISO3046, AS2789, DIN6271 and BS5514.) nominally rated. See T030. WARNING:! Back feed to a utility system can cause electrocution and/or property damage. Do not connect to any building electrical except through an approved device or after building main breaker is open.