Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021 09-21 CC PACKET
City of Gem Lake, Minnesota City Council Meeting, September 21, 2021 Call to Order of City Council Meeting By Mayor Artig-Swomley at 7:---p.m.. Call of Roll Artig•Swomicy Cacioppo Hyncs-Amlee Johnson _ _ ___ Lindner Others in Attendance: Sign-up Sheet Agenda • Ciry Council Agenda for this Meeting (Accept Agend A) • Approve the Minutes from August 17: 2021 City Council Meeting Comm ittec Reports. Old Business New Business 41 Planning Commission • Newsletter Ideas • MS-4. Report Presentation -Emily Jennings, SEH • MS-4 Public Hearing • Resolution.4202 1 -008 Gem Lake .2022 PreHminaryBudget • Gem Lake Infrastructure Issues o Scheuenernan Road Storm Water Report -Next Steps o Gem Lake Public TraiI/Tree TrustRcport- Special Invited Guests, Kim Anderson-Uipen and Matt Lasch, RES Co. o Hoffman Road Slope Failure Update -Justin Gese o MDH Report on Eight Gem Lake Wel]OBrief Review of Gem Lake Water Plan o Hdritage Hall -Jim Lindner ■ Updates on Plumbing/Restroom Work, Kitchen Sink, Security Cameras, Corporate Mechanical Automation, Outdoor Lighting; Countertop .Expansion ■ New ideas: Possible Repairs on Automatic Door, Possible Restroom Door Option • Internal Management Update o Credit Card Processing o Possible Health. Insurance Stipend o Training/Notary Status o Rental Property Status • Gem Lake Credit Card.Policy/Updated Purchasing;Poiicy • Archery Deer Hunting Ordinancc'1`611a Hearing + Archery Deer Hunting Ordinance. Discussion by Council and Processing of any Permit Requests • Burning Permit Process. • Disposal Container Ordinance Proposal. • Rush Lino BRT Update • Gem Lake Emergency Plan • Community Outreach to Other .Cities and:Government Bodies • Claims • Quarterly Financiat Report/Monthly rinancial Report • Presentations from the Public, 2 minutes maximum • Open Items for Council Members to Bring Up Future Council Meetings • Next City Council Meeting, Tuesday. October 19, 2021 • Next City Council. Workshop October 12, 2021 Adjournment—Tlie meeting adjoumcd at CITY OF GEM LAKE Heritage -Hall 4200 Otter Lake Road I Gem Lake, MN 55110 651-74.7-2790/.92 1651-747-2795 (fax) E-mail dity&cft11akejnn.org Gem Lake City Council Meding September :21,2611 Sign in Sheet City.of Gem Lake { City Couneft Meeting —.August 17, 2021 Meeting Minutes Mayor Artig,Swontley called the. meeting to order at 7:00 P.m. Councilmembers Cacioppo, Lindner and Johnson were present. Councilmember Amlee was not present. Also present, City Engineer Justin Gese, City Attorney Patrick Kelly, City Treasurer Torn Kelly, SEH Water Resources Engineer Emily Jennings; . VLAWMO Administrator Phil.Beliiori, Planning Commission. Member Joshua Patrick, Summit Farm Villas HOA Board President Sharon Roland; Residents Jim Wilson, Paul Emeott, Isaac Nelson, Kim Anderson. Uzpen, Nick Cress, and Greg Smith. August 17 2021 A enda A motion was made by councilmember Lindner to accept the agenda with the addition o£ "and other" added to the Use of Credit Cards for Pen -nit Fees; seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Voice vote taken, all voted yes, motion passes, agenda:approved. Minutes A motion was made by Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo to approve the. July 20, 2021, City Council Minutes. Voice vote taken, all voted yes, motion passes, minutes approved. A motion. was made by Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo to accept the August 3,:202.1, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, Voice vote taken, all. voted yes, motion passes, minutes accepted,. Committee Re orts —Plan ninCommission Commission Member Patrick gave an overview of the Planning Commission Meeting on August 3, 2021. There were two (2) public he held at the meeting pertaining to language..in the Consolidated Land Use Ordinance No, 1.31 pertaining to truck farming and consideration -of a Conditional Use Permit for.5 Hillary. Farm Lane. Changes to the Consolidated Land Use Ordinance would follow the, same criteria as. the change to the other sections regarding truck farming. The.Planning Commission looked over the criteria for the Conditional Use Permit and is recommending City Council approve the permit. Old Business — Newsletter Ideas Mayor Artig-Swomley presented ideas for the next Newsletter to include pieces on the Hoffman Road Construction, attempted carjacking at White Bear Floral, Tree: Trust, City Hall Improvements, 2022 Proposed Budget, Donations, Archery/Deer Hunting Ordinance, .Census. Numbers,. VLAWMO, MS4, and the Scheuneman: Road Storm Water Report. New Business Gem Lake Infrastructure, Issues Hoffman Road Update. —Justin Gese Mr: Gese reported complete. hat work is almost completed. The area.has been milled and paving is Gem Lake Villas Update — Justin Gese Mr. Gese said there is nothing new to report. City of Gem Lake CUY Council Meeting Minutes August 17, 2021 11Page Corporate Mechanical Automation Update t The City is waiting on Corporate Mechanical. to get the equipment to make the updates. Once those are in stock Corporate Mechanical will schedule a time to come out and make the updates. Councilmember Lindner asked Corporate Mechanical for training for himself and the City CIerk so that we know how to operate. the new building automation: Outdoor Lighting Update NEI is waiting on the equipment to arrive, and at this time it is showing a delivery date of September, Once the equipment has arrived NET will call to set up a date to come and complete the work. Office Update —Counter. and Cabinet Proposal Councilmember Lindner gave an overview of the quote that was received.from the same company that did our other countertops and cabinetry in the office. To put in an additional 'countertop.add cabinets above. and below, a quote in the amount of $5,490.00 was given. Councilmember Lindner made a motion to accept the quote for the countertop and cabinets in the amount of $5,480.00, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Voice vote taken, all voted yes, motion passes, quote accepted. Internal Management Update The City Clerk is in the process of making the. Ordinances and permits more user friendly on. the website, and is working on records management in the office and on the computer files. The City is looking into the option of giving the City Clerk a stipend for health insurance; Councilmember Johnson will do the research on different insurance options for the City Clerk, on what amount should be set fora reasonable stipend: 2022 Preliminary Budget Discussion City Treasurer Tom.Keily gave an overview of the 2022 preliminary budget for the City of Gem Lake. The 2022 preliminary property tax levy is proposed at $588,063, which is a 9.24% increase over 2021 certified preliminary property tax levy. The 2022 preliminary property tax levy consists of a debt levy of $87,285.00 (a decrease from 2021 preliminary debt levy of $2,656.0.0) and the general operating levy of $500,778.00 (an increase of 1.1.69% over 2021 preliminary tax levy). The following changes were made from the 2021 adopted budget.as a basis for the 2022 proposed preliminary property tax: levy: i. Based on the 2015 Refunding Bond schedule the debt levy for 2022 is set for $79,480,00. In addition, in 2018, the City issued bonds for the improvements on Scheuneman Road and the 2022 debt levy for this issue is $7,805. The two of these debt levies makes up the City's 2022 debt levy of $87,285. 2. Licenses and Permits decreased $1,400.due to less buiIding activity. 3: Added $7,000 for,small.cities aid from the state. 4. City Council contingency was left at $10,000. 5. Clerk/General Government increased 8.45% to reflect added expenditures on new city clerk, includes the City's PRA contribution ($2,145) and additional training (conference registrations $1, 500). 6, Police budget was increased I 0.85% to $915,000 based on the. City of White Bear Lake's budget. 7. The cost of fire services could increase 14.40% to $29,343.00 based on the City of White Bear Lake's budget, 8. Road Maintenance budget includes $20,000 for :trimming boulevard trees. 9. Salt/sand remain at.$17,000 and snowplowing contract increased from $18,500 to $20,000. City of Gem: Lake City Counei[ Meeting Minutes August 17, 2021 3 IT a g e Archery Deer Hunting Ordinance Possible Changes Mayor Artig-Swomley. gave a review of the proposed language changes and additions discussed at. the May. 10,102 .1 Workshop. The revised Ordinance will be put on the Gem Lake website after final approval in September. Request for 30 Day Moratorium on Permits Due to the late notice for the Public Hearing on the Archery topic, Mayor Artig-Swom ley would like to request a 30 day moratorium on Archery Hunting permits in the City of Gem Lake, A. Public Hearing.is scheduled for the September 21, 2021 City Council Meeting. Councilmember Lindner made a motion to grant a 30 day moratorium on Archery Hunting permits in Gem Lake; seconded byCouncilmember Ca�ioppo. Voice vote taken, all voted yes, motion passes, 30 day moratorium granted. September Public Hearing A public Hearing has been scheduled for the September 21, 2021 City Council Meeting to discuss the proposed changes to Ordinance No. 124 B. Proposed Changes to Ordinances Regarding Truck Farming for Section 8.3 of Consolidated Land Use Ordinance Following, a Public Hearing, discussion,. and a motion at the City of Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting on August 3, 2021, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the following change in Section 8.3.1 D) of the Consolidated Land Use Ordinance No. 131..Delete in Section 8.3 Conditional & Interim Uses " 8.3. 1 D) The harboring and housing of agricultural animals on tots greater than one (1.0} acre. Replace in Section 8.3 Conditional & Interim. Uses "8:3.1 D) Truck gardening and other commercial horticultural uses and/or the harboring and housing of agricultural animals on lots greater than one (1.0) acre. The proposed language is in further support of the recent changes to 5.1, 5.3 and 7.3 of the Consolidated. Land Use Ordinance No. 131 that followed a Public Hearing, discussion; and formal .motion approved at the.July.6, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting and action taken at the City Council Meeting.on July 20, 2427 , Councilmennber Lindner made a motion to approve the recommended changes to Section 8.3 of the Consolidated Land Use Ordinance No. 131, seconded. by Councilmember Cacioppo. Voice vote taken, all voted yes, motion.passes, changes approved. CUP Request for Accessory Building on Hillary Farm Property Following a Public. Hearing; discussion; and a motion at the City of.Gem Lake Planning Commission ]Meeting on August:3, 20211 the Planning Commission recommends approval of the CUP request for 5 Hillary Farm Lane. The request is based on a conservative inferpretation of the Land Use Ordinance, suggesting the outbuilding building could technically be considered a second outbuilding due to the consolidation of lots over time. The proposed outbuilding will result a smaller footprint and less impactful use that what would. have been expected prior to the combination of lots. It has been designed to match the appearance. of the main house and pool house.. The purpose of the building will be for storage of property maintenance and gardening: equipment. The current garage is considered an attached.structure. Due to terrain changes and trees the outbuilding will not create a visual impact of building density. The design conforms to the.Hillary Farm HOA requirements and has received preliminary HOA approval contingent oil City approval. Councilmember Lindnerade a motion to approve the CUP for 5 Hillary Farm Lane, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Vomice vote taken,.all voted yes, motion passes, CUP request is approved. City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting Minutes August 17,-2021 51i> t.gi Presentations from the Public, 2 minutes maximum Kim Anderson-Uzpen asked if we could help verify the boundaries of tile public, land, Mayor Artig- Swomley let her know that she emailed heron the question earlier in the day. Kim is also requesting some equipment to complete the work on thepublic land such as clippers and rakes which would be stored at city.hall. C.ouncilmemberLirider made a motion to authorize the equipment purchases needed based on City Council approval,.s.econded by Councilmember Cacioppo. Voice vote taken, all voted yes, motion passes, equipment can be purchased based omCity Council approval.first. Open Items for Council[ Members to Brine U Councilmember Cacioppo stated that if the. DNR calls to ask about a deer population survey to say yes. .Future Council Meetings City Council, Tuesday September 21, 2021, Workshop, Monday September 13, 202I canceled. Adjournment Being there no further business, following a motion from Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo; the meeting adjourned at 8:54 p.m, Respectfully submitted, Melissa Lawrence CityorGeri Lake City Council: Meeting Minutes. August 17, 2D21 7 1 P i g.c. 11/2/2021 City of Gem Lake, MN NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit Program 2021 Annual Public MeelIng, Emily K. JenningEj SEH 5v�;,, 2D.�z, Overview f NPDES MS4 Program Background y Status of Compliance Y 2020.Reporting Yeaf New MS4 Permit Discussion Look Forward Comments / Questions NPDES Program Background Clean WaterAct> Established NPDES Permit .Y U:S. Envlronmenta] Protection Agency :.AdminlstereC locally by WCA r City of Gem Lake: Phase ll Small MS4 a General Permit coverage Stcrmwater Pollution Prevention Plari (SWPaP) 6 Minimum Control Measures (MCM). r Best Management Practices (BMps) Messurigote Soars NPOES Nations! Polrufanr Oiacharge Elrminsttun System MS4 MUnicrpat Separate Storm Sewer System 1 Program Summary MCM 2: Public Participation/Involvement ..Solicit and Respond to Pubfic Comments I2/18/2018 (2017 Reporting Year) 0812012019 (2018 Reporting Year) r8117/2020 (2o19 Reporting Year) . 9/2112021 (2020 Reporting Year) Program Summary Y MCM 3: Illicit Discharge, Detection & Elimination Cfty storm water base map use far system Inspections %No reported iIIICit discharges in Jan. 2020 Program Summary MCM 4; Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control No Active Constriction Sites > 1 acre in mo :11/2/2021 3 ��/z/zozz New MS4 Permit Public comment began Tuesday September 7, 2621 (through 106121) Review and respond to comments (as applicable) > Coverage Extended -: Clock Starts, Initiate Updates 12 Months for Updates CITY OF GEM LAKE Heritage Hall 4200 Otter Lake Road I Gem Lake, MN 55110 651-'747-2790/92 651-147-2795 fax � (fax) � .M E-mail cit emlakemn.or September 14, 2021 To: Mayor and City Council From: Tom. Kelly, Treasurer RE: Setting the Date and. Time of the 2022 Budget Meeting. State Statutes require Cities with a population of 500 or more to hold a public meeting where the budget and. property tax levy will be discussed and public input is allowed. This meeting `must occur after November24th and before December 2811 and must start after 6 pm. The budget and levy cannot be approved by City Council until this meeting is held, .butcan be the same meeting. On or before September 3001, the date,:time, location and who to contact with questions must be provided.. to the County Auditor; who will send out parcel specific notices with the hearing information on them. These notices would be mailed between November I I'' and November 24th. Since the. only scheduled City Council meeting between November 25th and December 2$11' is scheduled for December 2111 at 7:00 pm. it would be my recommendation to hold the hearing on 21' at 7 00 at Heritage Hall. Look for us on the. World Wide Web at gemlakernmorg CITY OF GEM LAKE Heritage Hall 4200 Otter Lake Road j Gem Lake, MN 55110 651-747-2790/92 j 651 747=2795 (fax) - E-mail cit emlakemri.or:_- September 14, 202I To: Mayor and City Council From: Tom Kelly, Treasurer RB: 2022 Preliminary Property Tax Levy State Statutes require: Cities to certify their preliminary property tax levies by September 30'�'this year. Vince the preliminary property tax levy is approved and certified to the County Auditor, the City can lower the levy during the remaining budget process but cannot exceed the certified preliminary levy. For this reason, most Cities certify a preliminary levy using worst -case budget scenarios, which is the case with the City's 2022 preliminaryproperty levy and budget. The 2022 preliminary property tax Ievy is proposed .at $608,060,00, which is a 12.958% in from the 2021 certified preliminary properly tax Ievy: The.2022 prelimina. roe tax levy consists of a debt levy of $87,282.00 (a decrease from 2021 preliminary debt levy of $2; 5 00) and the general a eratin levy of $520,778.00 (an increase of 16.15% from the 202I preliminary tax Ievy), p g The following changes were made from the 2021 adopted budget as a basis for the 2022 proposed .preliminary property tax. levy: 1, Based on the 2015 Refunding. Bond schedule the debt levy for 2022 is set for $79,477.00, I addition, in 2018, the City issued 'bonds for the improvements on Scheuneman Road and the 2022 debt levy for this issue is $7,805.00. The two of these debt levies makes up the City's 2022 debt. levy of $87.282.00. 2. Licenses and Permits decreased. $1,400.00 for Less building activity. 3. City Council contingency was left, at $10,000.00. 4. Clerk/General Government budget includes $20,000 for health insurance coverage: 5. Police budgetwas increased I0:85% to $95,000:00, budget as of today. The City of White Bear Lake has not set their 6. The cost of fire services could increase 14;40% to $29,343,00. 7. Road Maintenance budget includes.$20,000,00 for trimming boulevard trees. 8. SaMand remain at $17,000.00 and snow plowing. contract increase from $18,500.00 to $20,000.00 9. Included a park maintenance budget of $5,000.00 for maintaining park are of the Villas of Gem Lake. 1:0. The 2022 budget includes $25;000,00. for future improvements. It. Revenue and other expenditure line items adjust based. on past history.. These changes result in the City proposed Preliminary 2021 preliminary levy of $538,308.00 and 2021 finevy of tax $535,476.00 Usiingra 2022 p o2022. �perty tax:le s compares to of $608,060.00 and the City's 2022 tax capacity ($1,426,695,00) and median valued home ($352,000.00j for Gem Lake, that median valued: home, would pay City property taxes of.$1,3.64.02 in 2022 com aced to2021 preliminary levy of $1;136:94 (an increase of $227.08) and the 2021 final levy.amount of p $i,130.79 (an increase of5233.23), Again, as the City prepares its final 2022 budget the property tax levy can be lowered from the preliminary levy, but not increase. above the preliminary pass a resolution adolevy. So tonight, the City Council is re uested to pting the 2022 preliminary property tax levy of $608,060.00. q Look for us on the World Wide Web at gemlakernn:org C a 00 4 0 tz ,� L CL a a 00 CA I'- N CN W 4 N lL p co _ a N N r N U. o .\ \ \ o In N 'N co m h N N1 m N O M (D O n1.O r Y � C7 r- pi c1 V m r 0 0 0 pp 0 N �t a N O aNp * 0 0 ca'] O a I- p' � ~ a~0 O tM- rn M a (O CV ti cp LO V r r 64% A, CN O 0 0 tf] CO' V N r 1- coQ7 co C7. r N r r 03 M p r Lo c M r �% gi m M M M p .(D 0 LO r CC) LO M ao M n" M v .:... M OD M i- N iV M cam'] . co rN-. C) co o N a co m dT pE p.. c "'_ C7: {Q in .�-_... C h n r cp f� N v 000 co m r c 0 cm n% 0)i LO w nt n s90v a ca 0t- r r LO M� M c �. a CO �{j p'_._. rn rn oo ti .- �n r� n M C) (p � 0 no 0 � ~ r t�to c `4. 'Mq' M 0 V CN C) lf7 N r Qi N � r r � C?mdcV W r O o o �' 00 M CO p I[y r 9 R `�o` O n CT O � CV co Cy N 0co a WN LM6 ° o Q) i0 CO t17 i� tl0 ll7. .00. M co r h O 0 h M W CV M wcl wZ c. 000Q x¢ �x izz zo0 �. F- U m °q x¢ 0 LU L g 2 `— ¢ IL W M X. 1¢. LL 0 W 0cww w a>> Lu .i w� a� a a w ¢2 ap 0U w c) a z lti m��LOoc) w Qsli � U v C.)N N ° °.J Z o w 0 w LU � Q 0 2 pp,, � U w A 2 FZ w j m F-m. w GENERAL FUND REVENUE BUDGET ACCT. 2017 2018 2018 2020 11117/2020 8117/2021 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2021 BJ1412021 2022DESCRIPTIONACTUAL ADOPTED ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGE 31001 CURRENT FAXES 310M DELiNQUEN[TAXES $353,073 $362,961 $359;790 $437,100 $4334305 $212,938 3510.052 17,71% 31003 FISCAL DISPARITIES 1,418 4,788 9,323 3A51 25,229 0 11 0 0.00% 01004.. PENALTIES 8, INTEREST 378 5,04fi 7 ,087 9,884 12,230 4,928 10,726 -12.30% TOTALRRpPERTYTAXES $359,657 1,774 $379,04 0 $370.728 (201) D 0. 0 0.00% LLCE�SES S4721092 $445,535 $217,877 $524,778 16.69% � P�.HN1Q$ 32100 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSES 3,200 11200 32101 ON-SALE,LIRUOR LICENSES 7,600 2'7IX1 2.600 2,000 475 2,000 0,04Y, 32102 OFF SALE LIpUOR LICENSE 200 11200 5,400 51800 5,400 31683 3,500 -35.99% 03 321NON-INTOXICATING L1000R..LICENSE;S 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0,00% 321Q4 OTHER PERMITS 550 ° 1,843 ° 1,43D 0 0 U a O.Do%. 32166 TOBACCO LICENSE 0 1.665: 1,200 985 1,200 .0.00% 32107 CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE 500 0 50 200 0 200 0 0.00% 32201 CONTRACTOR LICENSE 2,160 0 2,000 500 500. 504 500 500 32210 BUILDING PERMITS 12,715 1;565 1,01 1,200 1,200 1,400 16,fi7% 32211 PLUMBING PERMITS 11660 2, 3,270 270 6,745 10,103 8,000 4,751 8,000 0,00% 32212 GASlHEATING PERMITS. 2,420 7,54E i;845 1,000 19D 1,000 D,00% 32213 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 1;125 .2,570 0,613 21990 1,500 2,177 1,800 20.00% 32215 NPDES PERMIF 377 524 365 600 361 800 9.OD% 32218 . FIRE MARSHALL INSPECTION FEE ,200 8956 700 2 40D 2,200 3oo IOU 0 100. 0100%. 32219 SEPTIC INSPECTION FEE , 2;321 2;B50 y 0 2,500 107 2,500 0,00% 32235 SEWER CONTRACTOR. LICENSE 310 2.730 360 2,00D 3,600 2,0D0 0,00% 32239 RENTAL LICENSING 100 0 150 0 50, 82 50. 0.40% 32240 ANIMAL CONTROL LICENSE 310. 500 0 1,000 400 0 400 0.00% TOTAL. LICENSES & PERMITS $44.327 240, $46,860. 240 $85;310 320. 150 43Q ISO 0,00% $29848 $28,800 $18,761 W,,400 •5,22% 33401 LGA 13 8,002 33430 COUNTY GRANTS '& AIDS 0 0 q 0 0 0.00% 336D1 SCORE GRANT 33603 POLICE 0 I'm .15 2XV 13 9,173 12 1,D95 0 I'm 12' 0 0 0.00% STATE AID 5;111 0 1;000 On3;284 .33802 CAB LE TV FRANC HISE.FEES 6;969 71152. 74574 0 0 0 0 0.00% 33004 OTHER GOVERNMENTAIDS, AND GRANTS. 5,328 Q 6.000 8,436 6,000 0,00% TOTAL INTERGOV: REVENUES $18,619 0 520,304 0 $16;750 0 $1,107 0 33,770 7,000 0,00% 57;400 $42,218 $14,000 100.00% 32220 SURCHARGEISAC.RETAINAGE 363 32230 ADMINISTRARGES TIVE CHA 0 (190) 141 67 50 D 50 0.00% 34105 FLANKING CHARGES 3,eB6 11,309, 0 11160 0 0 0 0 0.4p%31,622 34116 PLAN CHECK FEES 6,153 9,908 17,614 0 200 275 200 FALSEALARMS 0 3,348 3,0Op 1,151 3,000 34121 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 0 0.00% 34122, ENGINEERING CHARGES 0,372 0 21,789 0. 1,416 6 0 0 0. 0.00% 34123 ZONING.CHARGES. 0 0 0 0 0.00% 34126 CHARGES FOR LEGAL FEES 39 b,452 700 75 0 0 0 0.00% 34132 1NVK$TMENTADM INISTRATiVECHARGE 197 0 212 1,680 Q 0 0 0 D.00% 34CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 545 0 {23B) 200 18 24 OOD%135. TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES $17,766 0 $52,146 $23,240 0 0 0 0 0.00% $3,252 $3,A50 $1,590 53;450 35100 TRAFFIC & OTHER FINES 1,072 1,145 1,768 TOTAL FINES & FORFEITS $1,072 $1,145 620 1,100 164 Soo �54.55% $1,769 $620 $1;100 $164 $500 •54,55% 38210 INTEREST EARNINGS 069 .2,504 11,698 8,478 5,000 36231 CHARITABLE GAMBLING CONTRIBUTIONS 0 0. 977 .5,000 0.00% 36241 INSURANCE POLICY DIVIDENDS 297 135 0 0 0 0. ° 0.00% 36200 MISCELLANEOUS 1736 16,624 9 154 2,798 0 0 0 0,00% 38400 FACILITY RENTAL 3,848 3,252, B,968 3,494 500 324 SOO 0,00% 3920o TRANSFERS.IN ° 3,584 3,000 25 3,000 0,00% TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS $6,750 ° $22,515 ° $18,820 D $18,332 D $8,500 4 D 0.00% $1,396 $8,500 0,00% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES $476,191 $522,100 $6,20.635. $525.252 $492,385 $282,406 $572.628 16,30%.. CLERK/GENERAL GOVERNMENT PEPARTMENT41900 ACCT. 2017 2018 2019 2020 8117f2021 8I17/2021 # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2021 ADOPTED 8/10121 2022. % ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGE 100 WAGES & SALARIES TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES $23,970 $24,871 $26,034 $24;421 $27�620 $18,790 $28,600 n 3.55% 130 FICA CONTRIBUTIONS- ° 1,869 ° 1,491 2;so3 0 0 0 0 °.aoss am% 131 PERACCINTRIBUTIONS 0 2,605 4,076 2,113 852 2,18a 135 HEALTH INSURANCE 0 O 0 0 0 $20 2.145 0.00% 150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 301 0 225 0 12B a 0 0. 20,000 TOTAL, PERSONNEL SERVICES $28,140 $25,567 $31170 293 800. 445 5O0 SUPPLIES $26.789 $30,233 $211.013 $53,433 70,74% 212 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2;031 1,906 1,602 499 2,000 1,199 212 POSTAGE 1;206 1,319 1;321 717 1,450 2,000 p,ppn% 25a: SALES TAX O 0 .0 1,166 1,450 0.00'1A TOTAL SUPPLIES $3;237 $3,225 0 $2,983. $1,216 0 0,450 0 0 0.00% $2,367 $3,450 o.w% 300 UTHEEi,.SERVICc S &QHARM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 41500. 0 305 ADMINISTRATION 90 631 120 0 2,000 0 2,000 0;00% 308 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 329 .90 500 363 500 0.00% 309 MISCELLANEOUS 29 0 {107} 0 0, 0 Sta 0 D 0 O.00% 310 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES 0 200 1,865 20a 0.00% 320 INTERNET CONNECTION ° 0 ° 485 485 p 500 093 1,500 200.00% 322 WEE 1E $7 767 B98 0 1.aBB 0 1,163 0 0 a O.GC% 331 MILEAGE 51 11200 1.096, 1,200 0.00% 332 RECORDING SECRETARY 0 73 0 0 1SQ q 150 0.00% 394 COMPUTER. SERVICES 3,345 0 0 4,213 1,612 0 3,396 a a.00% 350 PRINTING -OTHER p .4,216 4,359 6,000 .188 8,00 0,00% 0,51 . LEGAL NOTICES. B59 0 1,044 O 479 a 0 O a 0.00°%. 352 NEWSLETTER/PUBLIC RELATIONS 11737 2A30 1,047 520 800. 722 000 0.0095 361 'GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE i,368 1,030. 1,10E 2,500 702 .3.000 2p,ppo% 363 VEHICLE INSURANCE 75 1,091 1;280 3,000 1;78q 3,a00 0.00% 365 PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY INSURANCE 139 0 37 150. 75 100: 98 1a0 0.00% 384 RECYCLING C0LLECTION 7,982 8,067 (75) 16,304 0 8,104 ISO 0 150 0.001% 434: VLAWMO 0 9,600 4,72E 101000 5:26.5i 435 LMC 801 0 232 a 614: a O 0. 0 O:Oo% 430 RCLLDUES. 175, 0 866 800 430 800 0.00% 440 DUES.& SUBSCRIPTIONS p 350 184 400 260 400 0.00% 450 CHARITABLE GAMBLING I DISTRIBUTIONS p 0 4,467 0 0 so 161. 50 000% TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $21,518 $22,832 5 $33.327 0 $19,669 0 2,310 0 0.00% $27.1150 $18,519 $29,850 7.1846 :570 �A�1T6L�SZi};9y FURNITURE & OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 580 OTHER EQUIPMENTAMPROVEMENTS p 5,493 0 O 0 0 0,00% TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 ° $0 ° a 0 0 0 0,00% $5,493 $0 30 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL CLERKIGENERAL.GOVERNMENT 550,895 $52,644. $72,979 $49,B74 581,533 f41,899 $8B;733 40.95% LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 41560 ACCT. # AD000NTDESCAIPTION. 2017 2018 201R 2020 SIM2021 2021 IY1712021 EBVI ACTUAL. ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED 8110121 ACTUAL M22 PROPOSED % 300 .PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHANGE 303 PROSECUTION $0 $o $0 $0 $0 204 LEGAL SERVICES 4,598 ,487$0 135 3,000 50 OAOK 305 LEGAL .SERVICfS- LAN DISSUE3. 13,736 23,860 23.960 24,7$9 40,000 12,922 3,000 0.00% 309 MISCELLANEOUS 6,975 12,527 70 98 5,000 0 56,000 25.00% 317 LEGAL ANNMT1ON 0 0 0 0 0 .5,000 0.00% TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 0 2,290 p 0 0 0 0 AM $25;309 339,971 324,517 $25,002 $48.000 $12,877 0 O.OD% TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES 358,000 20.83% 525,309 $39,971 $24,517 $25;002 $48,000 $12,972 $51WDO 20,831A PLANNING :& ZONING DEPARTMENT 4'{910 ACCT. 2017 2016 2019 2D20 0/1712021 2021 6/17=21 # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED W621 2022 % �TNF.[i�E,f3Yl�,S�HA�� ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGE 300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $0 37 $776 $0 308 ADMINISTRATION 1,521 $0 $0 $0 $0 302 ENGINEERMGSERVICES 20,723 $9,444 0 28,416 0, 3,600 20,000 0 5,000 4286% 300 MISCELLANEOUS. 0 .30,986 15,760 20,000 a,Opgs 315 ZONING ADMINISTRATION 0 0 0 689 50 p 50 0.00% 325 NPDS TRAINING 0 403 2,443 995 750 3,330 2,000 166,87% 326. NPDES EDUCATION 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 9.00% 327 MS4 REPORTING 3,792 0 732 5,271 0 2;355 0 6,06 0 0 4.D0%. 332 RECORDING SECRETARY 0 13,311 6,000 0,00% 348 'COMP, PLAN UPDATE 32,017 0 13,120 S 3,452 D 1,856 0 0 D 000°k 433 DUES & SUBSCRI"ON6 0 0 p 0 0 0.001A TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $5&,053 SM.626 0 339,582 0 $36.961 0 330,300. 0 $32,415 0 0.00% $33,050 9.06% 576 a6UTAIJQLW& FURNITURE & OFFICE EQUIPMENT a a TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%% $0 $b $0 $0 $0 0.00th TOTAL PLANNING 8 ZONING 1358,063 $113,628 $39,682 $3 AI $30,300 $32,416 $33.060 9,08% FIRE DEPARTMENT 42200 ACCT, 2017 2Ui8 2019 8117=21 S11712021 # ACCOUNT DpSCRiPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2020 2U21 WWI 2022. g{,. aBwQEEAnmm ACTUAL ADOPTED ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGE 308. ADMINISTRATION $0 $0 309 MISCELLANEOUS. a $0 $a S0 $0 $0 O.a0�5 311 312 FIRE MARSHAL FIRE MARSHALL SERVICES 12,2 0 13,0 0. 15,700 a 18935 , 0 $19,200 0. 1J;119 0 $22;593 o,av6 17," TOTAL OTHER SERVICES a CHARGES 4,22525, $16;497 4,098 98 5,860 6,3w $6,450 .3,761 $6,750 4.65% 517;115 $21,880 $25,241 $25,650 514,880 $29.343 14,40% TOTAL FIRE $16497 $17.115 $21,680 $25;241 $25.650 $14,880 $29,343 14,409: BUILDING INSPECTIONS r DEPARTMENT42401 ACCT, 2017 2018 20f9 811712021 8/1712021 # ACCOUNT 0&SCRIPTfON ACTUAL ACTUAL 2020 2021 81i0J21 2022 ��ul4Eu ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGE 100 WAGES 8 SALARIES S0 TEMPORARYEMPLOYEES 0 $0 $0 $p $12,604 SO $12,50 O,aDy6 130 FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 0 p 0 a 0 0 0.00% 131 PERA CONTRIBUTIONS U 0 0 a 958 a 956 0,fl096 135 HEALTH.INSURANCE 0 0 O 0 938 0 938 0.00% 150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION O 0 0 a 0 0 0.00% TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES a0 O q 0 185 0 .185 0,00% $0 30 $0 $14,579 $0 $1q,578 0.00% 313 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 12,115 16,448 21;490, 7,245 309 MISCELLANEOUS O 18,000 8,g97 iB4O00 p,ppo/ 318 BUILDING SECRETARY SERVICES 0 0. 1,911 a U 0. 0 Q 0.00% 334 COMPUTER SERVICES 0 11752 444 2,200 1.252 2,500 13.04% 328 CODE ENFORCEMENT 0 0. 210 70 0. 2.520 0 OX0% TOTAL OTHER.SERVlCES &CHARGE$ $12,115 0 $18;359 0 $23;452 0 0 0 CAS, 1�4 $7,759 $18,200 $10.269 Si8,500 570. FURNITURE &.EQUIPMENT 0 TOTAL.CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 0 0 0 5,000 0 5•�0 0.00% $0 so S0 $S g00 $4 $5,000 TOTAL SUILOING INSPECTIONS. $12,115 818,359 $23,452 $7,759 $37,779. $1a;289 $3B4O79 0:78% ICE & SNOW REMOVAL DEPARTMENT 43125 ACCT, 2017 2018 2019 811712021 8/17/2021 N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2020 2021 8110J21 2022 �1lEPLlEB ACTUAL ADOPTED ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGE 226 210 SALT SAND OPERATINGSUPPLIES=OTHER S4,761 $8,628 . 414.211 $1,994 $17,006 $2,244 $17,000 o'm 250 SALESTAX 0 0 0 0 a ° a 0 0, 0.00% TOTAL SUPPLIES 81 38,628 0 $141211 0 31,994 0 $17,000 0 a 0.00% $2,244 $17,000. a;0aya 309 MISCELLANEOUS 0 400 REPAIR/MAINTENANCE-OTHER 1,876 0 2,555 0 a 0 0A0% 404 REPAIRmAINTENANCE-CONTRACTUAL 51981 15,099 0 14,674 O 2'SW 0. 2,500 0,0a% TOTAL OTHER S£RWICES & CHARGES $7,657 6,061 18,600 3,346 2010W 8.1N S�lT9L4U�C $17,594 $14,674 56,081 $21,0W $3,340 $22.500 7,14% 540 HEAVY MACHINERYIEQUIPMENT 0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 0. 0 0 O a 0 ROD% $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 S0 .0.00'/ TOTAL ICE & SNOW REMOVAL 512,61 B 828,222 526,885 $8;055 $38,000 $5,592 $39;500 3.9A PARK. MAINTENANCE OEPARTMENT4410 AOCT,, 1 2017 2018 2019 8117/2021 8f1717921 fl ACCOUNTOESCRiPT1ON ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2020 2021 5110/21 2p22 ACTUAL. ADOPTED ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGE 211 CHEMICALS. $a 210 OPERATING SUPPLIES -OTHER 0 $0 SO s0 $a $a SO p,ppg5 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS p .0 0 0 0. 0 p 226 SIGNS, SIGN REPAIR MATERIALS 0 0 0 .0. 0 000% 250 SALES TAX 0 0 a 0 0 0 0.00% TOTAL SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0 0. p 0 a 0,003fi so $0 .$9 $p $0 $0 $0 o,00% 300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 464 PARK MAINTENANCE - CONTRACTUAL :0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.00% 400 REPAIR/MAINTENANCE-OTHER 0 0 0 81 5,000 0 5,D00 0,0WA 309 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 am TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES SO 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0.00%. $0 $0 $81 $5,000 $a $5,000 0A)m 640 HEAVY MACHINERYIEallIPMENT Sb0 OTHER EQUIPMENT/IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00°h TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 p 0 a 0 0 0 0,001A $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $a 0.00% TOTAL: PARK MAINTENANCE $0 $0 $p $81 $5,000 $0 $5,000 0;00% COUNTY, CITY AND SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT LEVY CERTIFICATION PROPOSED TAXES PAYABLE IN 2022 1) General 2) Debt 3) Other (Please Specify) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Total. Net Tax Capacity Based Levies 11) 12) $520,778,00 871282.00 (Total 1 through 9) 1 $608,060.00 MARKET VALUE BASED LEVIES 13)Total Market Value Based Referendum Levies 14)Total Certified Levy M (Total 11 & 12) [ $ 0,00 (Total 10 & 13) 1 $608,060.00 1, the authorized representative of the above mentioned Governmental Agency, certify that the foregoing information is accurate to the. best of my knowledge. Signature of Authorized Representative Title Date Phone Number of Contact Person f Please.return this form to AskPropertyTax@co.ramsey.mn,us City of Gem Lake, MN Resolution No, 2021-008 September 21, 2021 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY PROPERTY TAXATION FOR THE YEAR 2022 WHEREAS, the City Treasurer has presented a (Proposed) General Fund $572,628.00 which includes a (Proposed) General Tax Levy of $520Budget of ,778.00 and a Debt Tax Levy of $87,282.00 for fiscal and calendar year 2022 based upon best estimates of costs for running the. City of Gem Lake in 2022; and WHEREAS, the estimates were reviewed by the City Council on 17 August, 2021 and amended based upon best information received from outside contractors and input from City Council NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Cityof Gem Lake formally adopt the 2022 Preliminary Tax Levy as follows does General. Property Tax Levy $507547.00 Fiscal Disparities 13,23 ] .00 Debt Levy 87,282,00 Total Levy $608,060.00 ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is charged with Certifying said Tax and Debt Levy to Ramsey County Property Taxation and other government bodies for whom information is required, this The foregoing. Resolution was offered by Councilmember Lindner and was supported by Councilmeznber Johnson and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: V"!T!!������JOHNSON A'S-AMLEE Yes Yes Attest I; Melissa Lawrence, the duly qualified City Clerk for the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey; State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the. City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. IvIELISSA LAWRENCE, Acting City Clerk 21 September 2.02.1 Date RELEVANT LINKS: IV. Taxation notification procedure Minn, Slat, § 273,465, subd. 1. The table below outlines the annual taxation notification procedure and deadlines (sometimes called "truth in taxation" or "TNT"). The deadline for Minn, star. 2�s.o��; cities to adopt the preliminary tax levy and certify it to the county auditor is Minn. StaL:§ 275.065, Sept. 30. The deadline for "special taxing districts;" such as economic svba' 1' development authorities (EDAs), housing and redevelopment authorities (HRAs), port authorities, and others, is also Sept, 30. Departincnt 4lion, nuc; According to the Department of Revenue, cities with populations of 500 or less 'Grath in Taan xation, See pIdly Tax Levy, and all special taxing districts (except the Metropolitan Council, the. M aderty Tax Levy, I.MC Metropolitan. Airports Commission, and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control Modcl Resolution. �. Minn. slat. § 275.065, Commission) are exempt from the requirement to hold a meeting with public subd, 3, paragraphs {c} input prior to adoption of the final levy. All cities, including cities with populations of 500 or less, and special taxing districts must still certify proposed property tax levies to the county auditor on or before Sept. 30, 2021. Taxation Notification Summary Chartfor Taxes Payable 2022 Date Action On or before All cities and special taxing districts must adopt any proposed Sept.,30 property tax levy and certify the proposed levy to the county auditor, On or before At meeting, in cities Of population greater than 500, the Sept. 30 city council adopts the proposed. property tax levy and .announces the time and place of a future city council meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed, prior to final budget and levy determination;. This public input meeting must occur after Nov. 24 and must start at or m after 6 p.. The time and place of the public input meeting must be included in the minutes, but newspaper publication of the minutes is not required: Cities over 500 population roust provide the county auditor with: the following information*: The time and place of the meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed. (Again, meeting must occur after.Nov, 24,. and must not start before 6 p,tn.) • A phone number that city tax payers. may call if they have: questions related to the auditor's property tax notice; this does not require listing a private phone number. • An address where comments will bexeceived by mail; this does not require listing a private address, * As noted above the list of information for the.coun auditor nds be hwin substantiall ex ain fAII 2022. League of MInnescta.Cities Information Menlo: Budget Gulde for Cities 711812021 Page 4 9113/21, 2.59 PM Protecting Gem Lake residents from contaminated drinking water I Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Protecting Gem Lake residents from contaminated drinking water Recent water sampling from private wells in this area has revealed the presence of the chemical 14-dioxane above state health risk limits. Where results are above the health -risk. limit residents. have been provided bottled water as a short-term,solution. The agency will work to ide ntify and implement the best long-term solution to providing clean safe drinking water. Municipal wells supplying White Bear Township were tested and 1,4-dioxan.e was not detected. Residents within the community of Gem Lake generally rely on private wells for their water supply, with the exception of one residential development In the southern portion of Gem Lake served by the municipal. water system from Vadnais Heights. Properties in the business district have municipal water from White Bear Lake available. Source of contamination remains under investigation The Minnesota. Pollution Control Agency (M.PCA) and. the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) are actively investigating in this area to determine the impacted area and source of contamination, The study area shown on the figure .below is the focus of the investigation,. Residents within the study area have .received requests from the MDH, MPCA, or a consultant to .sample their well. Households with wells that have been sampled with results in excess of the MDH health risk limit (HRL) have been notified and are currently receiving bottled water. Stay engaged. State agencies will be providing additional information as it becomes available. Virtual public meetings are also being scheduled to share additional information. For questions or additional information about private well sampling contact Michael Ginsbach at the MPCA, 651-757-2329 or michael.gi.nsbach@state.rnn.us, h tt p s;//www. Pca, sta te. m n; us/wa ste7p rote cti n g-gem-1a ke-residents-contaminated-drinking-wate r 112 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1,4-Dioxane in Privat e Wells - White Bear Area 8/24/2021 Gem lake and the Recent private,well sampling In Gem Lake has detected the cheinica! 1;4 dioxane above,th'e Minnesota Department of Nealth (MDH) drinking water guidance value' What is 1,4-dioxane? The main use of 1,4-dioxane was as a stabilizer for the chlorinated solvent 1,1,1-trichloroethane {often used for industrial purposes)..114-dioxane can also be an unintended contaminant in the production of certain products, including some. cleaners, detergents, adhesives, inks, automotive fluids, etc. Groundwater contaminated with 114-dioxane is largely caused by the historical use and disposal of chlorinated solvents. How can I be exposed to 1,4-dioxane? Drinking contaminated water is the primary way people are exposed. Minor sources of exposure are food prepared with contaminated water and:incidental ingestion and inhalation of water vapor during showering. Absorption through the skin is:a[so thought to be insignificant. MDH Health Risk Limits Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) uses Health Risk Limits (HRLs) to protect people's health from drinking water contaminants. The table below shows three HRL values for 1,4- dioxane set by MDH, for differing time frames and possible health endpoints they are based on. The 1,4-dioxane HRL of 1 part per billion (ppb) represents an amount of a contaminant that poses little or no health risk to those drinking the water daily fora lifetime, including sensitive or highly exposed people, MDH Health Risk Limits for 1,4-Dioxane Du "ration HRL Subchronic (>30 days up to 10% of a 300 ipph) * Health Endpoint" "" ; " lifetime} Liver, kidney, and respiratory systems Chronic (>109'0 of a lifetime) 100 Liver, kidney, and respiratory systems Lifetime (070 years) 1 Cancer *HRLs are shown in units of parts per billion (ppb). This is the same as micrograms per liter {}gig/L); «1C H v LO p vi O r'I O co n ir�H co i 6 i/ � in, N N 4 Ln a O_ q u _ 2 a o0 O 0 L H C x m rn 4 x rev ry v 7 a E m ti E U a m Ln N LM 0 Irt n 0 L' C a � O. Q, �/1 m 0 (� N 'E N m H cn x Ln a m x x a LM N u � 7 FO- o 00 N LC7 H I `r S Q Cc w yr a a ..Jt2 M 0— z. 0 a 1 O D N a� H C a a +,. Q s C� q (5 L7 ►Z ri U ry 07 N x a 1� m 00 LAx Ln N W VS m c V, � O o � � H M r-1 m N � rl O00, rV n O N N O P 1 00he fV 0 N QOj O m O. N N n a u n m L7 a {� (. a Q� N Lo m �r J O L7 � CL N a 0 L } m o J 47 a s m N v 4 fa N U. LL u7 CL ¢�7 O 0 ❑ x n cc n v vi. a� 3 L Q o a m O 7 x � m $ it O U Ln lu rA 0..~�. L :N c •E o m `m u C ra � Z L E y a% '+- a a cu � w Q o Q7LL Ica _i . U E ♦L.. O N N x ti i <w. 4'i3A T ba H Lr) X [V N Q7 ❑ o CA Ln of i-1 of In ........:: i, Subtotal to S1.582.88 Total $1,582.88 City of Gem Lake Gem Lake Restroom Doors 4200 Otter Creek Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 Attn: Jim Lindner 651-262-6618 j i m.l i nd ner@g emia ke m n.o rg .Customer Pro oral Dana Krick Dana,krick@r6corddoars.com 612-554-5957 Territory.Sales Manager Date: 9/2/2021 Valid to Date:10/1/2021 Quote#: NI-020921066 Furnish 8, Install Units: 2,00 FAI-8100 retard 8100 series heavy-duty 36" operators in Ciear Anodized finish Door Mark: Restroom Doors Dimensions: (Door Opening Width) 36.00" Door Speciticatioris: a100 Single, Clear, 36", Clear Anodized Parts: 4,00 Push.Plate, S/S 4.5" Rnd, T&L With Surface Mount Boxes and Wireless Controls units: 1.00 - ................. - - - - • - - - - - • - prlc�' $4,700.00 . FAI-810o record 8100 series heavy-duty 36" operator in Gear Anodized` finish .. ........ Door Mark: Main En_ try Interior Doar Dimensions: (Door Opening Width) 36,00" Poor Specifications: 9100 Single, Clear, 36", Clear Anodized '-Replace existing LCN operator, reuse existing handicap push buttons `*"120V POWER ACCESS CONTROL AND SECURITY By OTHERS"*" price; $2,1'0%vo Signature Date US record automatic doors, Inc. HQ: 1300 Metro Or E Ste 136 Pleasant Hill lA 50327 j Canada HQ: 4120 Ridgeway Or Unit 26 Mississauga ON L5L 559 } record Service:800 260 8833.1 Service@recorddoors:com record CITY OF GEM LAKE PURCHASING POLICY All purchasing by local units of government is regulated by Minnesota State Statute 471.345. Given the basis for purchasing by the State; the City sets the following policy for internal controls. All employees in the urch asin shall seek to act responsibly as custodians of the public trust. Employees shall avoid anytransaction hat m ghtgmpairss public confidence in the City's ability to govern effectively. Employees shall recognize that the purchasing process is subject to Public, review and evaluation. The overall process shall be. designed and managed with.a.degree of professionalism worthy of the public trust. Failure to follow this policy .will constitute illegal purchasing and may subject the purchaser to liability for the expenditure and or disciplinary action.. A. E ose: The purchasing policy is designed to: I • Maintain continuity of supply as needed. I To do so with minimum investment in materials inventory, • Avoid duplication, waste. and obsolescence, 4• Maiintain standards of quality in materials based on suitability for use: Standard specifications will be used wherever practicable. 5. To purchase iriaterials at the lowest cost consistent with the quality and service required. 6. To make as many purchasesas possible on the.basis of competitive ]lidding unless there is.an emergency that requires immediate action to protect the health, safety. or we employees, .[fare of the City residents or 7• Conduct the entire purchasing process in such a clear manner, without the conflict of interest to eliminate any possibility of improper business.relationships, 8• To have high personal integrity and be capable of protecting pub] icinterest at all times. g• Deal fairly and. equitably with contractors and suppliers and to extend to all organizations and individuals an equal opportunity to share in providing materials and services. 10. To afford vendors reasonable courtesy, B. Ob'eetives. The purchasing policy was designed with the following objectives: 1. Improve service and support. 2• Maximum value for dollars spent. 3• Sound inventory. management. 4, 5• Economic operating cost. by the effective use of available time. Economic quality of purchased materials 6. —suited for intended use. Economic delivery of purchased materials. 7• Optimized systems and procedures. S• Effective planning system. g• Effective controls. 10, Effective public relations through proper communications, C, Pow. 1• ]tams less;than 500 The City Clerk or Mayor of Gem Lake shall be allowed to make purchases of $5t)b or less for the benefit of the public, including items. such as office supplies, equipment,, postage and other items with a public pu clerk shall obtain the authorization from. the Mayor prior to purchasing. rpose. The All purchases falling into this category. wi]I still go through the monthly claims. review as part of the: Meeting and will be approved for payment by.the council. city council All purchases over $504 will beheld for the council and will follow the monthly claims. apro city council meeting,, unless it. is an emergency, pval process at the IX, A roved vendors: The City will useauthorized vendors; Whenever possible.the City, will use existing (previously, used) vendors for purchases. Ifa new vendor is required, the. department head shall request approval of that vendor in writing from the Finance Officer, Finance Analyst or City Clericby completing the New Vendor Request.Form. The request should .include the reason for using the new vendor. All paper work needed to establish the vendor in the City's accounts payable. system shall be submitted to the accounting clerk; including name of vendor,. malting address, Phone numbers, email address, W9, and if needed proof of insurance. The accounting clerk will provide the new vendor with the City's ST3 (certificate of tax exemption). X. Vendor Invoices. All invoices should be mailed by the vendor to the City address of: City of Gem Lake Attn: Accounts Payable 4200 Otter Lake Road Qem Lake,. MN 551 t0 Or emailed to cit a emlakemn.or gm Xl. C m letion nfa urchaseorder. I Date: Date that the purchase order is prepared & Date of Order Placed, 2• Requested By; Name of employee requesting the purchase., 3. Vendor: Complete name and address if possible. 4. Quantity; Complete in units as each, box, gallons, feet etc:. 5.. Description: Describe what is being purchased. Be specific as color, size, type, etc., including all information available, 6- Amount: Actual if possible, otherwise list estimated cost. 7. Funding, If not budgeted; provided which budgeted funds will be used to make the purchase 8. Coding; fast the activity or department that into be. charged for the .purchase. 91 Signature(s) Signature.of employee making the purchase: X11, Purchasiprjnciples. 1, Ali employees are required to cooperate fully, to the end that the City should obtain the maximum advantages offered by a purchasing system. 2; Formal criteria shall be established and purchasing..regulations issued as required, to establish equity and, to protect the.public interest while, at the same time, assuring that regulations are not excessive, conflicting, or do not impose undue costs. 3. The City will purchase vices, maximum. extent practicable from private enterprise to fulfill:the needs for goods and services. 4. A11 purchasing actions; including those: resulting from actions of sovereignty, shall be based on a:doctrine of fairness and equity, 5. Purchasing shall acquire the benefits of competition. to the maximum extent practicable. 6, The City shall pay fair and reasonable prices for ac and ceptable goods and services for all ordinary necessary costs consistent with accepted commercial practices when .included in the price quoted, 7. The City shall establish and maintain ethical and impartial relations with aI1 suppliers. concerning purchasing activities. Revised 2/5/07 Revised 121I / 14 Revised 7/6/2o Revised & Adopted 9/2I/21 CITY OF GEM LAKE, MINNESOTA PURCHASE CARD POLICY The City sets the foilowing policy far internal control of the City's purchasing card program. Failure to follow this policy will constitute: misuse of the purchasing card and may,subject the em Purchasing card privileges. and. may be.subjeet to liability for thee ployee in the loss of xpenditure and or disciplinary action. A. P ose: The purpose of this policy is to establish regulations for the use of 0typurchase cards in order to maintain a clear accounting for purchases .made with these cards. These guidelines will reduce the Potential Loss and misuse of cards. It will also provide employees with a.flexible and convenient method to make purchases for the city. B. Ob' ctives: Efficiencies in the Ciry's purchasing process are gained through the use of purchase cards. The following are situations where the use of purchase cards will allow for better productivity and savings: L Local vendors are. paid:on.a timelier basis. 2. May increase the .speed in obtaining materials. I Fewer checks are written. This aIIows for fewer lost checks reconciliation. I and reduced'titrie for bank 4• Eliminates the need for employees to use personal credit cards and seek reimbursement when making:on-line purchases and. registering for trainings. 5. Reduces the need to complete credit applications for vendors where few or low dollar Purchases are made. 6. Allows swift cancellation Of employee's ability to charge after employment termination, 7. Reduces costs by eliminating invoicing fees, 8. Reduces cost through cash rebate (rewards) program, 9. Purchases can be directly traced to cardholder. C. Policy. This policy is intended be consistent Statutes. The with the City's Purchasing Policy and Minnesota State Finance office may use his/her judgment and discretion while delegating and implementing this policy; The City's purchasing cards are not credit cards. The outstanding balance must be paid in full each month, No cash access (ATM) is allowed with the purchasing cards. The Finance Officer in consultation with the Clerk Treasurer will determine which employees 'wili be assigned cards and any restrictions that will pertain to individuals' cards. A purchasing card will be, issued to a specific employee in that employee's name and can be used by ONLY that employee, Before taking possession of the purchasing card, the employee must read and sign the credit card user agreement. A supervisor may request a credit card for an employee to the Finance Officer, The Finance Officer and Clerk Treasurer may use their discretion in approving said request. A purchase card shot)[d be used at anymerchant that accepts Visa except as "the City may otherwise. restrict or direct. CITY OF GEM LAKE, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 124 B AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE DISCHARGE OF WEAPONS AND HUNTING ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, MINNESOTA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE ORDAINS: Section 1. Intent and purpose. The City Council intends to protect the public safety of its citizens by regulating the use and discharge of certain weapons on real property in the City of Gem Lake, as permitted by Minnesoa Statutes,§ 471.633. The City Council recognizes that State law governs all other matters regarding firearms, including purchase, possession, and rights to carry. The Council also intends that existing State law relating to the discharge of bows and arrows in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 97B, and to the purchase, of other potentially dangerous weapons under Minnesota Statutes, § 609.66 and similar laws, be enfor d' ng in hor euse City. Section 2. Definitions. As used in this Ordinance: "Dangerous weapon" has the meaning given it in Minnesota Statutes, § 609.02, subdivision 6. Section 3. Discharge of Weapons Prohibited. Except as specifically authorized in Section 4, the discharge or use of dangerous weapons is hereby prohibited. Violation of any term of this Ordinance is a misdemeanor. Section 4. Exceptions. Dangerous weapons may be discharged or used in the City only under the following circumstances: 4.1 Permits for Archery Deer Hunting. The City Council may issue permits authorizing the use of discharge of a bow and arrow within the City for purposes of deer hunting. Said permit shall be issued only during the appropriate game season for deer, or as deer hunting is otherwise authorized by the State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources. A deer hunting permit shall be issued to the property owner or owners in the case where multiple properties are joined to obtain the 5 acre requirement. 4.1.1 A hunting permit granted under this paragraph shall only authorize the discharge or use of bow and arrow on a specified parcel of property of five (5) acres or larger within the City of Gem Lake. Multiple properties may join in an application for a hunting permit, provided that the combined properties are contiguous, combine to be 5 acres or larger, and will allow for a contiguous safe hunting area. All owners must join the application if properties are combined. 4.1.2 The property owner(s) must apply for the permission a form approved by the City. The consent of the owners of all parcels adapplication must be accompanied by a petition on an approved city form showing the written }dct4 ro osed deer stand. The applicant must submit a ma ofthe PrA�ty within 300 feet of a showing the size of the parcel, the proposed locations of deers ands and expected shooting lanesrty proposed for deer ,, and the location of any buildings on the property and adjacent property with a map scale showing the distance in feet from the deer stand to owner's homes on adjacent lots. The permit holder must notify all land owners bordering their vroperty of the dates of the hunt and locations of the deer stands. 4.1.3 The City Council, in granting the permit, shall establish boundaries for the hunting area on the property which shall be sufficient to protect public safety but in no event less than 300 feet from any hOme&9arare or 1000 feet from any school. The City Council may further limit hunting areas within the specified parcel of property, and attach other conditions to the hunting permit deemed necessary to protect the public safety and welfare. Ordinance No, 124 B Hunting & Discharging of Weapons Page I of 3 4.3 Defense of Self and. Property. Against Vicious Animals.. It is not: a violation of this Ordinance to use a fireai7n or bow and arrow against a vicious animal while acting in self-defense, in defense of ther person, or to defend properly (including pets and other domestic animals), from }farm or damageoThs provision is not intended to. affect. State law regarding the use of force against another for self- defcrise, defense of others, or in defense of property; 4.4 Law Enforcement. This Ordinance shall not apply to licensed peace officers or other authorized personnel engaged in law enforcement activities when using. firearms or other weapons in. the regular course of performing their duties.. Section 5. Scverability. Should any section, subdivision, clause or other provision of this Ordinance beheld to..be invalid in any court of competem jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the O or:of any part hereof, outer than the part held to be invalid. rdinance as a whole Section G. Repeat, Gem Lake Ordinance No. 124 -1 is hereby repeated. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect publication, . and be in force Fromand after its passage and Dated. November 23, 2016. 'NOW, THEREFORE ;. the motion for the adoption of the foregoing Ordinance Was rriade by Cauncilmeinb.er Ar - Swomley and seconded by CouncilmertiberBasak with 3 votes in favor and 1. vote in opposition: Cauncilmearibes Artig=Swomley, Basaic, Lindner in favor, and lGIayor Uzpeh apposed. Gounci.lmember Kuny was absent; Robert Uzpen — ayor 01""arn Sher! _ Clerk Summary of Ordinance ].24B.approyed by City 2016. Council and:published iii the White Bear Press on November 23 Ordinan" No. I24 B Hurtling &.DCseherging.o(Wcupons Page 3 of 3 r` Hunters List 2021 Name Phone DNR Row DL 2.1- DanIV Tol€oOmn 651-4D24373 651-253-2472 365.999 245 T+t12i353aT782 h4423182773109 I 3. 4. JimLyloJohnson Jim Kohl &11 Nak1 651-895.7177 612-581-1715 013-a5S-C)19 620-286.923 14183 1<40036-746SQ5 H376001088318 hN4241181286io 5. Allen Koehn Cody GaoO 65 1 •235-1226 309-681-4ea 621.195-379 3484 R298168493619 7. T GWrge Bump 970-370-8591 651.755.1Qu8 58T-fi86-339 587-479-43 .95W G( J122T348B E2M22088715 S979'168317425 8, 9, J6uh Patrick Sawyer Sullivan 612. 42-0225 7b,33.2d2•g749 731-953-337 ?7?7777 1v1"17$149 X984272697319 8952058A 15516 10. 11, Jack Monk IUSC Nelson 651- -310 630-931 a 799 .8�-t2B-3811 7�Q204SR MN20072337 L000024124200 rat2-42329-1310 285-669--dD8 7721215C7 �58�2b7t5�t319 0087041586213 -1� 17,181� 20 21-,22;25 s ., aft �. ._Res rche Deer Lic/Re Ali .MDNR#: 285-669s-008 ISAAC INGAL NELSON 1270 GOOSE LAKE FAD SAINT PAUL, MN 5511 04139 COOS:10/2511983 Height: 5'9 0 _ hlle�i ht:. 175LBS Drivers License; GOfi7041�3s213 9., Firearm safety: Eyes: MALE Ekes: BROWN Fees Archery Deer Lid Season: Ali $3; , 04 z Harvest Reg. : 161409008 'registration ofyour animal is are mandatory,Pleas 1-883.�`Ofi-fi367 lagan to www.m e call agent lace. tian. Be re ndnr,gavlhunting, or visit an prepare d-with the following information. Write your confirmation number an the line below w registration is complete, when 1. Harvest.Reg #: 161408008... _.. 2, Permit Area°(3digit" number) , IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIII 3. Type of Deer' �v"� 4, Date of:kill � Registration CZ�hm'o #; Licensee Signature: -------------- I certify that 1 meet the citizenship requirements and have maintained a gal residence in the state for a period of 64 days immediately preceding Ene date of this application. lily license(s) are not otherwise revoked. Trans #: 060870964 Agent: 082016 Issued: 10110/202017:45 Terminal: 52291254 TOLL 9- 245 .r`0 229 TH A Ve t4e S T BE TH E Li M N 55U4: 6; 10/ 11 1 1 ,96 WiVe ` V LiFYI nse • M423162773109 trearm Safety: T4121353677,82 tes Archery Deer Lic ,ksason: AR Aarvest Reg.. #: 90168�,')qq Height, 5-9 T ■Oight, 912LB Gender: MALE C\j Eyes; FALU E 'W%Oftraton of,pur,animal is mandatory. Please call 3 ,1090h to VIi1Nw.,�nndnr,gov/hu ?tjn o a ge rrt lC�C$ tI� rr. Be pre pa read Ith lh s fo �+ �` ��� �� �lov���r�g informatvn, te your confirmation number on the egistra tfon is complete, I1 ne b � 1�� when Haroest Reg B: 801685099 Permifgrea (3 dlgN numbe0 IINNNIIIIIII�IIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIII�uI�I��� TYPe Of Deer IIIIN III Vllltl IIY Date of kill Regjstrat n Confirmation n #R ,nw signalure: 19a-z�v' ,,.....,.,......�..., ate- •• i 1dt I ►rc rho +plli1 r�"" —_ rcftce irr the 918110 � tO of this appitcali+n. M It onbleO � eye r� MOOHIO � Pr(t"O y vrt�e(a not 01homoo revokoal. d, Terrnad- $2291 2M $ "I Al4?inry Dartr Duneg skip 1 4DNRN: 587-6s.4 9 '".-OF1OKANTHblVy "61Mp ''"o FAWN LIKE W1':tr : uO y,.AI N05pYpo3lc x6,042rwi 7I 3'A LrryMp�'ain.0 :vognc 145t U4 ti,rrurm Serarr E.Y.w AUL4:' 7 073o 0-do' MALE 8WE . Q Amhary.Wet L.c "-�;595.pp �W WO- AA •iarvest RO.:x. 991200OU ;+JabNlbh uty40r Arirnwr n mondoory.. Pya» W1I •995:IDE-0:yi7 :ngcn m www.rnrujnl,dpvrhuni-N. 0+rbg4A afrq nv�rv,r.. 5+• u.l.�•nrr .un rM raihwrnQ.rrro,�atnn. :rda yoni ni,.:r.: 1wr• rw?b'! a" I* Ime Wic ..or. rJivrWori ii l.i=^l=llv ' Marvel Jiw f. ''m r -?p f tr IapI1� }}�J;1 �?jfjPer rmdhraa l:jdgrt n.mDor: f'�f�fllyBlll'.Il�fil5l�f[ll'rl$�. tyFrw al peer ti dlk D} kMi P wpi:liatror,:•,wdrrraGon DriVers Lice ' N42411-01`28810 fir *arm Safety- K4003874654 ► H6!g y a'Ln Weight;:.: rw Gander: MALs SOW GREEN. 0n F H,�vst l590329635 i $Mat is th*rMisto Pion to wvww4,w6drt0190vihUMtlir' id agent kcallon, Prepared wfth the follow fro iAR" rrrce your c4nflrmatlon number an the feg(S &iOn is complete, t H'Orvest Reg A 5903298-35 ri1 -Area` :dfg t riumi er) � J "MAI nfirmaiiah is ».. --at -. r.d A*—.n "I lag nt@iin Ofq 4 Ej "Res archery Deer Lic/R g Slip �IDNR#: 013-455-019 LYLE NORMAN ►JOHNSON 8015 237TH AVE N E S7,ACY, MN 550799304 D,08:10/04/T-954, . K: :......:r .:...K .Vers License, H378001068318 aarm Safety: J525564636765 ic #: nimal is I to WW the 35,00 509 )ry, Ple gov/hun isit an ow im nfc, 4ber on the fine below when 1. % "...rmat onnuM, ete. . . .. ..... . es. It 70T;0509 I Acejj�C,G Sicriatu Banc! have mami.-Airtoct cat 111c., s I .t ., al c NIC., (1410 Ot. P 10 d 0,' (3 0 d y d I I i licel-iNO(ts') -Ri 0 i1al Othorwl.40 Agont., 01.301.2 GJf�8 12 C),-'CJ Is 4 Minnesota tepartment of Natural Resources -- Site Tag rr.r r: oeoennr �os+c �t hrtl araN#1@p OR11 7rmns 11Rnf51 MDNRN: 165-792-656 ALIEN DONALD KUEHN N RnArcraryDnrUc 5;15:W 0 C+aawnWt RA 20,20 4 Harvest Rsg►; 34Ha "W 8 .n upon WIN ft dalmak lmmwlkmv M4 tha o rrmrkk day, endUms of hj"k rou mwl awdn W sib pQ to tha shf"wi rqulafia :Adsch strirg, MhN; � rin throush Of dls cuts In the bg and swum thn%OD lhr aNmaL Thr anaryl rm41 W rayifbrrd In aaoordonm wish A .DNFi NVUlafbns. �r f4pittmfpn CcriMnaedn / 181718 19,20 2122 232425:29272a:293031 Height- /� 6 i ht 140L ..y,4.. rf rs �. L00��24124200Y ,, �.: �nd�r. I��LE --w earm Safety; 639931799 Eyes: ETHER Ary� Youth T 1 r 1J 1, M .� '•t:�.r . '�S"t •'y.:r 'r::.;.•.. '�' tt:•:.?`.•. y Lip y r� $ a r ire t M` : � : 425174158 ,. . �straLion c � ; animal is mandatory, PI ! I $ 7 �� ���� Cali °���•� 3tv 9 , �.,;_; � � n to wvW . r, n d n r ar1 r..:.►t lvcati o hunting, or •isit an ; . � r With the fo l low i n of g i orr Oon • ? "'umberLrr���+ on ! the e line below •XS,;�.Y'r:' .. ; ' r •r LI y n�1�F� � 2, e`er r't rC,�:, it kcqper)3+ Typc ec Registr-9±��;;�, ,firrn , Li�cnse� Sit I certi y that i tl�� -gal zhie ptrfLr��h�p re u11. d-to of fill's c s�atQ for q �,lic 11x1 and here maintained a �ppj# a per .._ -Tediatet Y,Pry �g4rief: Yf P.4 >>:;[c�` jig %''i., �t=•`W•C... .... ... ..F`.......-v�}Y�:;•r er,r - : lri• .:SM'•.`^[': r , AlRea Slip wALLIAM COWARD HAK,1 6W 317TH 5T Height", 5`10 DOS; O�:07il. 3 ofghtr 17ai13S Dr *rs L,cerk's-e; R29816B493619 GOnder' MALE' Firewm Safety, Ey : BROWN + Res A rcherY Door LW, Owe L,; rite YOUr oantlrr oon cumber on the iin regtstrabon is cornp4ete, bQ10W when 1. HaPiest Reg #; 10661fi-O2 1 �erMd Are$ d;,gMbOr 'lyn; of D+ser. ;1 D<a of kill '�`�rs�iltif? #; i" I+•I 1rx, i'?'V;w'; • I#,>, , •,.. Is ,! �Ionia �4nd Iwo ilia, a,IlilyIi6a ����+a1ar i.410lIO9J, MV II�rltq) JiIS7 7'r1ili140c4ti1�3iffi� � ire fJ M D N R� .. � • e4,VL�j�� 88 1 2 JACK TNaM AS 1219 Sao ����- KE OEM LAKE, M N 55114 DOB:44f0312002 Height: 5► 9 q Drivers License: Z5,862571 5431 , Weight: 154LB Firearm Safety: 8801253 Gender: M 3Q ; ALE Eyes: BROWN Res Bonus AntlerleSs Deer '� Ll� �1 �.0 cc HarVeSt Reg. + 625812227 4 Registration of your animal is m 1 `S$$`705- andatory, Please oil 53571 logon to Www- mndnr,gov/hu.nting, location, Be prepared with the go�rl'hunting, or visit an following information, Write your confirmation number o registration is completes n the line below when 1. Harvest F'ieg #: 525&j'-227 2: Permit Area (3 digit number 3.TyPeOfDeer 9 4. Date of kill Registration Confirmation #: Licensee Sicgnature: l certify that !meet the citizenship requirements a legal residence in •ho Mate for a periodnd have maintained a the date of this application. My 11aens Of days it mediatoly preceding } not otherwise revoked. Trans #: 060874549 i$stied; 101111202012:06` Agent: o62o22 Terminal; 52290263 LU .0 3 CD QP.. C) 0 �................. _........ .... . .' 2 A n Q fs ,.... _... ...-- -----. - ...µ..L C � > Z 0m Zd a 0z 0-4 �m m� tt,�o� z o r o o " oy mb q 8 OmA '010 ll Ul 0 rn r � z o Q zi0 z "aC� X. ,� a NAM I JACK T MENKa+ Um ADDRM •� 1`�r����Q M9ER 24� a I 1219 GOOSE _ S COD t� oMRs1BRNM j. SAINT PAU[. M 1" ` ,DODFOUND rcar 2oo2-oa- ' one C i M ' �c I r . a!Ma+aairar.wrwwa�.raa rrwrrrawra rarwa.wrN.ara area raa.M .a�a� �ir�;ctior�s; Cut aiong dotted Mes. Fuici in 11flif Wong soiid line. fi:)is Minnesota BOWinmter Enucayon C:eyti#icate is rcxcrrgnizea Inc,. f 3Dproved by Vie NSEF and Minnesota DeNartment of Netjra1 Resources .s Proof of hone stjjdy. 'ri is cc-dficate is your pa, manzr-tit r-ertificate anti 3i€Q{Ai; YOU tv ie aii i Y purchase a huntiag license where required. «.__..-- --- 1. + 31trd � 1 3rinitrN� 1 ry3dl115 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 'a3P7pliia7.Sry�'a5n al our uplry JoyiO auol{ua 1py i 1b•�Fj�tila� fryl y1lM 13dllral of uoilulm a st 11 Ptri Pm tllslapun ]a 4Nn11 i 1 1 'Mind] dug u0 slur to uoryaidula] ayl la papinwd tuoryejn6ae 6i1BunN aio5auulW airy peal an0y i E r i nuaprsal a40somilNf a wa i z rasm07 siyi y1,M PalagOssa xPOMayI bnpatdlaoo�di algispodsal ARepouad wa j a Try 141l.iao Agala y.i i Minnesota 80whunter Education Certificate m Mlnnesafa Bawhunler Ed Cpetrse I�Iu wMM JOSHUA S PATRICK iSSI:Fd ; DC7D8ER ADDRESS 27, 70t6 1 7 DANIELS FARM RDWrCH Coop, FtiYIRPNESIEEAE SA1W PAQi-MN 55 110 CERnFrzrp r DDa iHN:017E1R9 kl'E co OR 197g.p4.10 BLUE UEN6FA i M 1 Directions:. Cut along doi(ed noes. Fold In half along solid line This Minnesota Bowhunter Education Ce4kncate Is recognized aPd approved by the NBEF and Minnesota Department or Natural Resources as proo[ of horire. Study, This certificate is Your permanent cerllficate and .allows you ld legallypurchase•a hunting licensewheie required. ., bowhunter-ed. com'" cr Q. r s t-, r---.-_---- _.----^-_----- -- -- ._^----- -----------; f 1 r r 1 1 1 31VL] r 3ilnilrNJIS 1N30fIlS � 1 r 1 1 ' r r. � 1 aleol)Ilaad sl41 as o; aw uey; iay;d audAue lo; .lo lllPaa 5141 411m aadLu01 01 uol;eloln r V, sr;� te41 puelsjapuri sal{ynl I f 1 r i asrnno:autluo. sjy;;o uoi;aldwoP 0411e papinoad suol;e1n6aa 6u1;unH elosauwyy 04; pees aA194'I E: 4uaplsaJ etdsauutVV a uue.I'T j 1 ' '2san03 sly; 411m Peleioosse, s J* GO; 6ul;alduaod ao; afglsuodsaf ,Slleuosiad We , ; r E 4e41 A)]Uaa. AgaJay 1. r 1 r r 1 ' �'�Rcourse.com ' 1 1 1. Educating Hunters Online ofr4nrwlNr o/ i .NaTVRa l.k l fO gor4 ty Minnesota Bowhunter Education Certificate 1:'. r;:: SAWYEq SULLIVAN Add[osa-; :; Issued f3T98TH.AVE 2U20Q8•]6. i i iLAI N.E,.#A. Ubil .."V+'V7::7200920SR 1 Gen&r rn 1 N { r 555 r 1 ; t �' n aururkols tN�anis ne I-j or A A I t •QlU:Nw83 SIy1 &Sn 01 alu Gjmg JOL46 out7Auj j m: i 0j47fJ1y,07 Slyj L{IIM 18d1Up1 o1 ucNWW E sl y 1141 AUUjslopun JByjlraj i I A t aelnp� titnluo siyl jo uoljefdww et71. ip:pepinad suoiyraln6a 6upun{� Ejo§atlulµj.agj pEOJ army 1 •E t :luapiserojoseilulYY a um l •� r •mlloo S1to L;p i�japosstii.Kiorn ay1 6urw dtup� rot elglsuod- Apauasrod um I 'l 1 i I ULD 4 in Agalay I i �. ,> gcourse.com i i Eduralln viers Orllirl8 w.arrwrrrm .. r•r.,atuAweat i .. `� Minnesota 8owhunter Education Certiflcate � 1' t 1 1' 1 � 1. MU C NUSON t . A , ' �darrN ilUr d i. :17:TGGOODE LAKE ROAD 26Rd7o-70' , .. :Gm L"A um 5010 �. ooe .r 7YW.�7p CaWcrrr 1 7777s1SCT ��� .., i m 1 .1 in to N m O' Uclu v O LL M CV ti LL y7 a. r n W c N Ol scornavacco & Garrott conservation Hunt 2021 on 7 Daniels Farm Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 I give permission for a hunt in 2021. Signature Print Ben Johnson Date _ Sept. 17, 2021 Scornava wo &Garrett conservation Hint 2021 on 7 Daniels Farm Road Gem. Lake, MN 55110 i give permission for a hunt in 2021 . Signature i3o� t, raor� la.C� T'w, Print Date Scornavacco & Garrett Conservation Hunt 2021 7 Daniels Farm Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 I give permission for a hunt in 2021. Sign at a r/e.. .�-� .---__- Print Date M � Scornavacco &Garrett Conservation Hunt 2p21 on 7 Daniels Farm Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 [ give permission for a hunt in 2021. Signature Print Date carnavacco & Qarrett Canseryativn Hunt 2021 on 7 Daniels Farm Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 i give permission for a hunt in 2021. Signature----_ . _ �-� Print,��� Date From: BFiET GAPP bretgapp@oomcast.net Subject: RW Scornavacco Garrett Conservation Hunt 2021 Date: September 17, 2021 at 10:17 PM To: Anthony Scornavarco ascornavacco@hotmaiiXom, Linda. Gapp Linda BPP@comcast.net 9 pp ast.net Tony, Apologies for the delay. We approve of the. hunt and will get you the paperwork, Hret On U ; t 712G21 6:12 PM Antony Sdornimcco ,Z*.;Esctsrniivar cn,f°hotrrrai;.i:otil> 'Nrote Hee9a Ere; and t nca. 't,;e t:8:'eat [ efT%ErVFd yU:i[ app[a><a€ or di5approvai for the hunt this y�ar_ :",Ouj;f vpu Pleasr. Slrjr7 Uncl return Me foirnB 'thank you. mny Anthony Scornavacco 7 Daniels Farm Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 612-963-8121 I, Anthony Scornavacco, allow Isaac Nelsonelson and Joshua Patrick to speak, on my behalf at the Gem Lake City Council Meeting on September 21 st 2021 . OLD , City of Gem Lake Heritage Hall 4200 Otter Lake Road I Gem Lake, MN 55110 651-747-2790/921651-747-2795 (fax) E-mail ci rah 7etrtlrtken�rt Permit to Allow Archery Deer Hunting in the City of Gem Lake PEP -MIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST: To prevent delay, please ensure the following information is submitted ❑ Application Fee (if paying with cash we can only accept exact change) El S 10a,00 1 S500;00 Security Deposit (separate check from fee) ❑ 5 Plus Acre Parcel Verified ❑ Bow Hunter. Education Certificate C3 DNR Permits ❑ Deer Stand Locations/Parcel/Building Location/Shooting Lanes ❑ Bow Hunter Education Certificate Permission is hereby given to located at �- �-^ � ,owner of the property L r Gem Lake, Minnesota, to allow archery deer hunting on the property. The fallowing guidelines must be followed or you will be in violation of Ordinance No. I24B:. • The permit to allow archery deer hunting on your property shall run from to el * o � I r 41G 20- �_ (three consecutive week maximum); • Shooting ofthe bow and arrow shall be on the following three days ofeach week only: tT15UQ • A copy of this Permit must be displayed on the premises; and • Additional requirements of the Gem lake City Council are listed on the reverse side of this permit. Date Mayo City of Uem Lake I/we, Fid f iC r4 have read and understand the above requirements. q Date Pro i Signature (all owners mujt si,en) Office Use Only ❑ 5. PIus Acre Parcel Verified ❑ $100,00 Fee Paid: Cl $500;00 Security Deposit © Bow Hunters Education Certificate Verified ❑ DNR Permits Verified Deer stand locations/pareel/buildings location/shooting lanes Property Owner Signature. ❑ City Council Approved Date: O Deer Harvest Report Received Date. ED Security Deposit Returned Date; Archery Dccr Hunting Permit Page i I New" City of Gern Lake Heritage Hall 4200 Otter Lake Road i Gem Lake, MN 55110 551-747-2790/92.1651-747-2795 (fax) E-mail ci rii:,einlal:en�i7,or +, Permit to Allow Archery Deer Hunting in the City of Gem Lake PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST: To prevent delay, please ensure the, following information is submitted © Application Fee (if paying with cash we can only accept exact. change) Cl $100;00 O wa.04 Security Dcposir (separate check from fi c) ❑ 5 Plus Acre Parcel Verified O Bow Hunter -Education Certificate t] DNR Permits ❑ Deer Stand Locations/Parcel/81 ilding Location/Shooting Lanes © Bow Hunter Education Certificate Permission is hereby given to owner of the property located at AU t >�L kT�.!►� Gern take, Minnesota, to allow archery deer hunting on the property. A Y The following.guidelides must be. followed or you will be in violation of Ordinance No. 124B: • The Permit to allow archery deer hunting on your property shall run. from to 20 (three week maximum), + Shooting of the bow and arrow shall be on the following three days of each week only: -F121- 5 L)ly • A copy of this Permit must be displayed on the prerniscs;. rand • Additional requirements of the Gem lake. City council are Iisted on the reverse. side of this Penn it. Date I/we, Date Office Use Only have read and understand the above requirements. 5 Plus Acre Parcel Verified ❑ City Council Approved ❑ $100.00 Fee Paid Date: ❑ OOS Security Deposit ❑ Deer Harvest Report Received ❑ Bow Hunters Education Certificate Verified Date. DNR Permits Verified ❑ Security Deposit Returned © Deer stand locations/parcel/buildings location/shooting lanes Date - Archery Deer ElunIiI iPermit Pngc; 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE ORDINANCE NO.77 SECTION 6. BURNING PERMITS REQUIRED 6.1 Open Burning Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to kindle or maintain bonfire nor shall any person normally furnish any such material for any such fire nor any Person authorize any such fire to be kindled or maintained on or in any street, alley, road, land l any public grounds or upon any private property without first obtainin a g w6� permit from the Fire Denartment y City of White Bear Lake 6.1.1 Recreational or cooking fires supervised by an adult and which are fully contained within approved fire rings, pits or appliances not greater than three (3'01-) feet in diameter shall be exempt from the permit requirement, providing no fire bans have been issued y the Fire Marshal or the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. by City of Gem Lake Ordinance No. 86 Nuisances Section 16. Portable Storage / Disposal Container Unit. 16-1 DEFINITION. The following definition shall apply to this Ordinance: 16-1.1 PORTABLE STORAGE / DISPOSAL CONTAINER UNIT. Shall mean any enclosed or open container constructed of any material used for temporary or long term storage of personal .property or any container used to dispose of solid waste, construction debris, or any.other refuse. 16-2. No.property owner or person shall store on a residential property a portable storage / disposal container unit more than thirty (30) days in, any I2-1nonth period starting with the d date the container unit is first moved an -site. All porta be stares' on an impervious surface on / able storage / disposal container units must ,fie property. The City may grant a time extension of an additional sixty. (60) days provided the property owner.gets City Council approval for the container from tl2e. City. In no case shall a portable storage / disposal container unit be stored on a property more than ninety (90) days in any 12=month period. This provision applies to all residential.properties including single family Home family complexes, s; townhouses; condominiums, and multi- 16-3. Portable storage / disposal container units stored oil residential properties in conjunction with a building permit or home improvement project are exempt from these provisions; except for the requirement, to keep the container unit on an impervious surfac owner shall make every effort to adhere to a e; In.such case, the property l20 day maxinnum time limit. p 1.6-4. Portable storage/ disposal container units meeting the definition set forth in Section 16-1 which are used for regular refuse and recycling . l pick-up on comrr�ereial or industrial properties shall be, exempt. THE SECTION OF THE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE WE HAVE. WILL CHANGE TO FIT THE CURRENT U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration September 1.3, 2021 REGION V lilinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio; Wisconsin Amy Spong, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer c/o Sarah Beimers Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Administration Building 50 Sherburne Avenue, #203 St. Paul, MN 55155-1402 Chad Konickson,: Chief, Regulatory Branch c/o Melissa Jenny Saint Paul District United States Army Corps of Engineers 180 5th Street East, Suite 700 Saint Paul, MN 55101-1678 Wendall L. Meyer,. Division Administrator c/o Philip Forst Minnesota Division Federal High-vayAdministration 3.80 Jackson Street; Suite 500 Saint Paul, MN.55101 Mary Bogie; Regional Administrator C/o Chelsa Johnson Metropolitan Council Gold Line. Project Office 12.1 7th Pl. E.,.#102 Saint Paul, MN 55101 Ted Schoenecker, Public Works Director / County Engineer c/o Andy .Gitzlaff Ramsey County Union Depot, Suite 200 2.14 4th Street East Saint Paul, MN 55101 Gretchen Artig-Swomley; Mayor c/o Gloria Tessier Gem Lake City Office ZOO West Adarns Street Suite 320 Chicago, 1L 60606-5253 312-353-2789 312-886-035.1 (fax) MetroTransit Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit Project, SHPO #201.9-0085 Request for Signatures on the Memorandum of Agreement September 13, 2021 Page 3 of 4 1.2.81 Hammond Road White Bear Township, MN 55.110 Michael A. Ericson, President c/o Bob Jensen, Treasurer Maplewood Area Historical Society 2170 County Road D East. Maplewood, MN 55109 Sara Hanson, Executive Director White Bear Lake. Area Historical Society PO Box 10543 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 RE: MetroTransit Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit, Ramsey County, Minnesota;. SHPQ ##20I9- 0985; Request for Signatures on the Memorandum of Agreement, Dear Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit Project Consulting Parties, The. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is writing to continue consultation for the Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit.(BRT) Project (Project), Please find enclosed for your signature the Memorandum n Agreement (MOA) for the Project. This MOA is the outcome of an extensive consultation effort among multiple. Federal agencies, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office; the Metropolitan Council, .other interested parties, and the public. Prepared in accordance with the provisions of 36 CFR Part 800, the MOA documents and guides es. measures: determined to resolve the Project's anticipated adverse effects to historic propertiThe..MOA includes measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse effects; processes for updating the Area of Potential Effects (APE), conducting additional. survey and evaluation of historic. properties, and assessing 1'rojecteffects on historic properties; guidance for handling unexpected discoveries or unanticipated effects during project construction; and procedures for reporting on agreementimplementation, dispute resolution, and .amending or terminating the agreement. Since all consulting parties last reviewed the document in May 2021, :public comments have been sought and received through the public comment period on the Project's Environmental..Assessment. In addition, FTA reopened consultation with American Indian tribes .and a tribal consultation meeting: was held on Monday, August 23, 2021. Based on these activities, FTA has made minor modifications to the document ,in consultation with tl�e Signatories and Invited Signatories. The modifications address. consulting party and public comments "received on the May 2021 draft, incorporate edits received from legal review of the document, and allow for additional identification and assessment of effects baseduponreceipt of additional information about properties its the APE. Due to the number of parties involved in. the consultation, FTA is executing the MOA in counterparts. Therefore, you just need to: sign and return the: signature page for the party you represent. We request yortr �Y MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION AND THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REGARDING THE RUSH LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Ramsey County, Minnesota, on behalf of the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA) and in. conjunction with the Metropolitan Council are proposing to construct the Rush Line. Bus Rapid Transit Project (the "Project"), a fifteen (15)-mile long bus rapid transit (BRT) project with twenty-one (21) stations and three (3) park -and -ride facilities; four (4) of the twenty-one (21) stations are. proposed to be constructed under the METRO Gold Line Bus. Rapid Transit Project; two (2) of the park -and -ride facilities. propose to use exist in surface lots and/or parking.structures and the other proposes the construction of a new parkin structure; the Project extends aloe a northerly and easterly alignment g g Y y gnment in mixed traffic or in a dedicated guideway, contrecting downtown Saint Paul with the suburban municipalities of Maplewood, Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake, White Bear Lake; and White Bear Township, Minnesota, as depicted in. Attachment A; WHEREAS, the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA), may fund the Project and has determined it is an undertaking.subject to the requirements of 36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR].Part 800, the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National [USCJ § 306108); Historic Preservation Act (54 United States Code WHEREAS, although Ramsey County has served as the local lead agency :for the purposes of compliance with the National Environmental. Policy Act (NEPA) and, in conjunction. with the FTA, prepared an Environmental. Assessment to satisfy both NEPA and the: Minnesota Environmental Policy Act, it is anticipated that the Metropolitan. Council will serve as the Project sponsor and federal grantee, lead the process. for engineering and construction, obtain the approvals and permits. to undertake. the Project as required by ]aw, and operate the Project; WHEREAS, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may issue a Department of Army (DA) permit authorizing the discharge ofdzredged or fill material in. conjunction with Project construction pursuant to 33 USC § 11 and Section 40.4 of the Clean Water Act (Section 404), 33 USC 1251-1376, as. amended, and has. determined the issuance of a DA permit is an undertaking subject to the requirements of Section 146 and 36 CFR Part 80(} Rush Line BRT 54 USC §.306108 MOA significance to historic properties that may be identified under the terms of this MOA, as appropriate; WHEREAS; pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.4(a)(1), FTA and MnDOT CRU, in consultation with MnSHPO and other Consulting .Parties, have defined an Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the Project as documented. in Attachment B to this MOA, and FTA may need to revise the Project APE as design and construction advances and, if needed, shall do.so in consultation per the terms of this . MOA; WHEREAS, FTA, in consultation with MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties, has undertaken surveys Of Portions of the Project APE to identify historic properties as defined by 36 CFR § 800.16(l) that are listed in, or eligible for inclusion in; the National Register of Historic Places (National Register); FTA has identified twenty-eight (28.) historic properties either listed .in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register, as noted in Attachment C; and as the design and construction advances, FTA may need to. conduct additional survey to identify and evaluate historic properties that could be affected by the Project and, if needed, shall do so in. consultation Per the terms of this MOA, WHEREAS, FTA has. determined in consultation with MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties that Project construction will have no adverse effect on fourteen (14) historic properties; these properties: are noted in Attaclunent C; WHEREAS, FTA has determined in consultation with MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties that Project construction will. have no adverse effect on nine. (9) .historic properties; provided measures identified in this MOA are implemented; these properties are noted in Attachment C; WHEREAS, FTA has determined in consultation with MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties that the Project will have an adverse effect on five. (S) historic properties. the Lake Superior &Mississippi (LS&M) Railroad Historic District: Saint Paul to White Bear Lake Segment (XX-RRD-NPR0O1), three (3) individually eligible 1868.Aligmnents of the LS&M Railroad (XX-RRD_NpRO02? XX-RRD-NPR003, and XX-RRD_NPRO04), and the LS&M Railroad. Historic District: White Bear Lake to Hugo Segment (XX-RR.D-NPRO05), that the adverse effects cannot be avoided, and measures are included in this MOA to resolve these adverse effects; WHEREAS, in accordance with 36 CFR § 800.6(a)(1) on January 19, .2021, FTA notified the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) of its adverse effect determination with'specified documentation and the ACHP has chosen not to participate in the consultation pursuant to 36 CFR § 8GO.6(a)(1)(ii ); Ruses Line BRT 54 USC § 306108 MOA 3 WHEREAS, the Signatories, invited Signatories, and Concurring Parties, are all considered Consulting Parties pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.2 c and. their roles s described. herein are consistent with those described in 36 CFR § 800.6(c)(1), (2), and (3), respectively; WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council shall implement the Project and shall complete the stipulations of this MOA, and FTA shall be responsible for ensuring that implementation of the Project meets the terms of this .MOA;. and NOW, THEREFORE, FTA and. MnSHPO agree that .the Project shall be implemented in accordance with the fdllowing stipulations in order to take into account the effects of the Project on historic properties. Stipulations The FTA, with the assistance of the Metropolitan Council, shall ensure that the following measures are carried out: I. Applicability A. If the Metropolitan Council applies for additional federal holding or approvals for the ( Project from a Federal agency that is not party to this MOA, the Federal agency may remain individually responsible for their undertaking under 36 CFR Part 800. Alternatively, if the undertaking as described herein remains unchanged, such funding or approving Federal agency may request in writing to FTA and. MnSHPO of their desire to designate FTA as lead Federal agency for the undertaking pursuant to 36 CFR § 8002(a)(2) and to become a Consulting Party to this MOA pursuant to Paragraph B of this Stipulation. B. If during the implementation of this MOA, FTA identif es other. agencies, tribes, individuals, and organizations with a demonstrated. interest in the undertaking due to the nature of their legal or economic relation to the Project or affected. properties, or due to their concern with the Project's effects on historic properties; FTA may offer such entities Consulting Party status pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.2(c) and/or invite them to become parry to this MOA, with notification to the other Consulting Parties. L If FTA invites an entity to become an Invited Signatory, the party may accept this status by agreeing in writing to the terms of this MOAA. and. so notifying FTA. If the entity agrees. to become an Invited Signatory and MnSHPO, USACE, FHWA, and the Metropolitan Council have no objections, FTA shall.follow Stipulation XVII to amend this MOA. Rush Line BRT 54 USC .§ 30.6108 MOA Metropolitan. Council contracts with an individual, the notification shall also include the name and contactinformation.for the Metropolitan Council staff member responsible for the contract. The reporting process outlined In Stipulation. ead. shall also document the name and. contact information for the Preservati on ii. The FTA and the Metropolitan Council shall ensure that consultants retained for services pursuant to implementation of this NIpA are SOI-Qualified Professionals, or in the instance of other allied. professions not covered by the SOl's Professional Qualification Standards, they shall meet other nationally recognized standards or licensure/certif cation requirements for the profession, as applicable: Whenever possible, individuals in allied professions should have a minimum of five (5) years of experience working with historic properties, C. The FTA acknowledges that Tribes possess special. expertise in assessin the Nati Register eligibility of properties with religious and cultural significance to their anal Tribe(s). If a Tribe requests, or if FTA otherwise offers and the Tribe accepts, Consulting Party status under this MOA, FTA shall seek input from the Tribe to determine whether a. SOI-Qualified Professional is. qualified to assess a property's Potential religious or cultural significance to the Tribe under National Registera's criteria.. OL Deliverables and Consulting Party Review Procedures A. To facilitate review, submittals to Consulting the Project plans that illustParties may be Iimited to the portions of rate the manner in which the Project may I affect historic Properties. Additional plans may be provided to Consulting Parties upon request. B. The Consulting.Parties shall be given an opportunity to review and provide on all findingscomments , determinations, documents, and deliverables: L For all findings, determinations, documents, and deliverables that are directly related: to construction activities and submitted for review during Project Construction, the Consulting Parties shall have. fifteen (15) calendar days to review and provide comments, unless otherwise specified. H. For all fndings, determinations, documents, and deliverables that:are not related to construction activities or that are submitted for review prior to or after Project construction, the Consulting Parties shall have thirty. 00) calendar days to review and provide comments, unless otherwise specif ed. Rush Line 13RT 54 USC § 306108 MOA 7 Consulting Party input received pursuant to this. Stipulation as Project plans are further developed. C. The Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead shall. review all Project plans at the 30, 60190, and 100 percent (%), or equivalent, design stages. The Metropolitan Councils. Preservation Lead shall also review any modifications made to the 100%Project plans, whether those changes are made prior to, or daring, Project construction. L At each stage of the review, the Met ropolitan.Council's Preservation Lead shall recommend to FTA whether revisions are necessary to the Projeet's APE, whether any.Project design changes may result in a change to FTA's finding of effect,. whether the design requirements of Stipulation V have been met, and whether the Plans: incorporate commitments made to the Consulting Parties through consultation under Stipulations VI and XII. a. If FTA agrees revisions to the APE are necessary, they shall be completed Pursuant to Stipulation IX; b. If FTA agrees the previously made finding of effect remains valid, design - related requirements. have been met, and all commitments reached during consultation have been incorporated into Project design, the FTA shall. notify the Consulting Parties of its findings. Unless otherwise noted in Subparagraph CAi of this Stipulation; notification may be completed through the reporting process outlined in Stipulation'XV. C. If FTA agrees that the previously made finding of effect is no longer valid, if design -related requirements have not been met, or if commitments reached during consultation are not incorporated into Project design, then FTA shall make a new finding of effect with the. assistance of the Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead pursuant to Stipulation XI. ii. For Project elements requiring Consulting Party review under Stipulation VI, the 30% and 60% Project plans shall be submitted to Consulting Parties for review and comment pursuant to Stipulation III, along with FTA notification. The 90% and 100% Project plans and any modifications to the 100% Project plans do not need to be submitted to the Consulting Parties unless the Metropolitan Council or FTA is requesting additional feedback on`the design of specific Project elements, or if a Consulting Party so requests. iii. If Project construction has begun and a modification of the. 100% Project plans is within 100 feet of a known historic property, the Metropolitan Council shall not Rush Line BRT 54 USC § 306 I08 MOA 9 xi. Buerkle Road. Station; LS&M Railroad Corridor Historic District A. Whitaker Street Station: LS&.M Railroad Corridor Historic District V. Design Requirements A. In order to minimize and/or avoid adverse effects to the Lowertown Historic District, Saint Paul Union Depot, Great Northern Railroad Corridor Historic District; Westminster Junction, StPS&T-F/Omaha Road Railroad Corridor Historic District, Johnson Parkway, Phalen Park, Moose Lodge.963; and Madeline L. Weaver Elementary School, the Metropolitan Council,, with the, assistance of the Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead and input from Consulting Parties, as necessary, shall follow, these design requirements to the extent feasible. while still meeting, the Project's purpose and needs: Lowertown Historic District and Saint Paul Union Depot: Project elements at Union Depot Station shall be located within the portion of the train deck Previously modified for existing modern bus infrastructure and shall be designed in conformance with the SOI Standards, I Phalen Park and Johnson Parkway: The trail connection to the noncontributing Bruce Vento Regional Trail in Phalen Park shall be blended visually and materially by mimicking the profile and appearance of the existing trail. iii. Moose Lodge 963: Project elements near Moose Lodge 963,. including but not limited to the Frost Avenue Station and Gateway Trail. Underpass, shall be designed in conformance with the SOI Standards. iv.. StPS&TF/Omaha. Road Railroad Corridor Historic District, Johnson Parkway, and Phalen Park: Vegetative.screening shall be preserved or reestablished between certain Project elements and the historic properties. Whenever possible, preservation of existing native vegetation in place. is preferred. If the preservation Of existing vegetation is not possible or does.not provide. adequate screening for structural Project elements, as determined by FTA. with the. assistance ofthe Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead, then reestablishment of vegetation shall be considered. Reestablishment.of vegetative screening shall consider existing vegetation conditions and proposed Project elements. The Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead shall advise the Metropolitan Council. throughout the design process. The following Project.elements and historic properties are subject to this requirement: Rush Line BRT 54: USC § 306108 MOA 11 between the Project elements and the historic property where. possible. Consulting Parties shall review Project elements within aiz area that extends approximately 800 feet southwest and approximately 200 feet northeast of the centerline of Cayuga Street. ii. Barriers at Forest. Street Bridge;. Physical barriers; if used, under or. near the Forest Street Bridge (Bridge No. 5962), a contributing resource to the SIPS&TF/Omaha Road Railroad Corridor Historic District. consulting Parties.shall review Project elements within an area that extends approximately 200 feet on either side of the point at which the dedicated. guideway crosses the centerline of Forest SItreet North. iii. Johnson Parkway Br. idge.Area: The Johnson Parkway Bridge, which passes over Johnson Parkway and is located near Phalen Park, and:associated Project elements, including but not limited to retaining walls, trail connections, sidewalks, and BIVIPs. The Metropolitan Council should consider the mass, scale, and overall design of the bridge span, piers, railings, and abutments,. and incorporate plantings in keeping with the park -like setting of the historic parkway and Saint Paul's Grand Round, Consulting Parties,shall review Project elements within an area that extends approximately 700 feet south and approximately, 500 feet north of the point at which the bridge crosses the centerline of Johnson Parkway. iv. Weaver Trail Underpass Area: Project elements near Madeline L. Weaver .Elementary School,. including but not limited to the Weaver Trail Underpass, trails, vegetation, and stormwater BMPs, The Metropolitan Council should consider the structure's mass, scale, and overall design of the. bridge span, piers, railings, and abutments, and its visibility within the historic property's viewshed. Vegetative screening shall be preserved or reestablished. between the Project elements and historic properties where possible. Consulting Parties shall review Project elements within an. area that extends approximately 400 feet south and approximately 800 feet north of the centerline of the proposed Weaver Trail Underpass.. v. Dedicated Guideway and Fitch/Barclay Trail Underpass: Project elements near the 1868 railroad roadway remnants between Kohiman Avenue and. Beam Avenue (XX-RRD-NPR002) and/or between Gervais Avenue and County Road C (XX- RRD-NPR003), if it is determined through Stipulation V1ll,A that.it is prudent and feasible for the Project.to avoid one or both of the historic properties. Consulting Parties shall review Project elements within an area that extends approximately 300 feet on either end of the 1868 railroad roadway remnant as Rush Line BRT 54 USC§ 306108 MOA I3 Avenue and Beam Avenue (XX-RRD-NPR002) and/or between Gervais. Avenue and County Road: C (XX-RRD-NPR003), if it is determined through Stipulation VIII.A that`it is prudent and feasible for the Project to avoid. one or both of historic properties. iii. Depending on the type of historic property and the nature and scale of the anticipated effects, the Metropolitan Council may include the following measures in the CPPHP: a. Construction. Protection Measures (CPMs) detailing specific protection measures and procedures to be implemented during project construction to protect historic properties. b. Historic.Property Inspections (pre-, during, and post -construction) that provide a baseline of existing structural and physical conditions to facilitate Identification and documentation of any structural and/or cosmetic damage caused by Project construction. Inspections shall include, but are not limited to, building/structure foundations, exterior and interior elements, topography, landscaping, and any other historically significant or character defining features of the property to document. any pre-existing defects or other damage. Inspection documentation shall include photographs and narrative to document the observed conditions before and after Project construction, and .as needed during Project construction. Depending on the type and nature of the historic property and anticipated effects to it, photographic documentation should include, but is. not limited to: ceilings, roofs, exterior and interior walls, windows, masonry; foundations, all sides of the exterior of the building, structure: and bridge wingwalls,. beams, substructures and superstructures;. plumbing, equipment, fences and landscape walls, topography, vegetation, driveways and sidewalks, and any historically significant:or character - defining features of the property, Photographs: shall be razor sharp in focus, properly composed, and Iwith adequate lighting to clearly show existing conditions such as deterioration and cracking that may be subject to dispute after initiation of project construction. c. When identified as appropriate for minimizing or'avoiding adverse effects to historic properties, other types of potential measures may include, but are not limited to, maintenance of access, vibration management and remediation, and noise minimization and mitigation. Rush Line BRT 54 USC § 306I08 MOA 15 supervisors, to complete the Project -specific Historic Property Awareness and Sensitivity Training prior to the comme ncement of construction activities. If a Construction Contractor hires or assigns any new Site Supervision and/or direct supervisor(s)to the Project during Project construction, the Metropolitan Council shall ensure that the new Site Supervision and/or direct supervisor(s) have completed the Historic Property Awareness and. Sensitivity Training prior to being approved for supervising any construction activities. The Historic Property Awareness. and Sensitivity Training shall include information on historic properties subject to the known I review requirements and processes for avoiding and minimizing effects to known historic properties, and procedures and protocols if unexpected discoveries are made. VIIX. Mitigation for Adverse Effects to the LS&M Railroad Corridor Historic District A. Avoidance through Design, The 1868 railroad roadway remnants between Kohlman Avenue and Beam Avenue (XX-RRD-NPRO02) and between Gervais Avenue and County Road C (XX-RRD-NPR003) are individually eligible for inclusion in the National Register and contribute to the LS&M Railroad Corridor Historic District. The Metropolitan Council, with the assistance of the Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead, shall investigate whether it is feasible and prudent to avoid these two (2) historic properties while still meeting the Project's purpose and need. Avoidance through design is the preferred outcome of this Stipulation. The investigation shall be as thorough and creative soas possible to identify engineering lutions that avoid adverse effects to the historic properties. i. If the Metropolitan Council determines. that avoidance of either or both historic Properties is feasible and prudent, Project design in. the vicinity of the avoided historic property shall. be subject to the requirements of Stipulations VI and ViT, ii. If the Metropolitan Council determines that avoidance of either or both historic .properties is not feasible and prudent, the Metropolitan Council shall notify the FTA. If FTA agrees, they shall submit. the determination `to MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties for review and comment pursuant to Stipulation III. The submittal shall include jusiiftcation for .the determination and confirmation that the Metropolitan Council shall instead complete a Phase III data recovery of the historic property that cannot be avoided, pursuant to Paragraph B. of this Stipulation. At its own discretion, FTA may convene. a meeting to facilitate discussion`about potential avoidance. FTA shall resolve any disagreements about the feasibility of avoidance pursuant to Stipulation XVI. B. Phase III Data Recovery. Prior to the start of project construction within 10.0 feet of the recovery site, or as specified in the research design/data recovery plan, the Rush Line BRT 54 USC § 306108 MOA 17 Parties no later than one (1) Year after the date the Project begins revenue service operations. C. National Register Evaluation of the LS&M Railroad Corridor, between Saint Paul and Duluth. The Metropolitan Council,, in consultation with MnSIIP0 and other Consulting Parties, shall ensure a Phase II intensive survey and. evaluation of the LS&M Railroad Corridor between .Saint Paul and Duluth is completed by SOI- Qualified Professionals as described below, The purpose of the evaluation is to determine. whether the railroad corridor historic district remains eligible for inclusion in the National Register under Criterion A after the completion of the Project and to determine whether any segments of the railroad. corridor historic district are individually eligible for inclusion in the.National Register. Associated properties, as described in Section F. Associated Property Types of the National. Register Multiple Property Documentation Form, "Railroads in Minnesota, 1$62-1956" (Railroad MPDF), shall also be documented at the level of a Phase I reconnaissance survey and;, when appropriate, recommended for individual evaluation under appropriate. National Register Criteria. Associated properties shall be classified as contributing or noncontributing to the railroad corridor historic district; however; individual evaluations of associated properties is not required under this Stipulation. i. The survey and evaluation, including preparation of a research design, survey report, and inventory farms, shall be completed in accordance With Stipulation IT Of this MOA and shall be. conducted under the. direct; supervision of SOI-Qualified Professionals who meet the qualifications for history and architectural history and who have successfully completed previous intensive level surveys of railroads: In addition to meeting the SOl Standards, the evaluation shall follow the guidance. in the Railroad MPDF, MnSHPQ's "Guidelines for Inventory and Evaluation, of Railroads in Minnesota" (March 20 1.9), and MnSHPO's "Railroad Company Information: General Information" (last updated December 31,. 201$), as appropriate. 'I- The Metropolitan Council shall submit the draft and final versions of the research design, survey report, and inventory forms to FTA for review and approval. Once FTA's comments are incorporated, FTA shall submit the draft and final documents to Consulting Parties for review and continent pursuant to Stipulation III. iii. The final survey report and inventory forms shall be submitted to MnSHPO and Other Consulting. Parties no later than two (2) years after the date the Project begins revenue service operations. Rush Line BRT 54 USC § 306108 MOA 19 IN. Changes to the Area of Potential Effects (APE). A. In accordance with 36 CFR § 840.4(a)(l) and in consultation with.MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties; FTA has defined and documented an APE for the Project (Attachment B). B. Throughout the Project design process,. and as needed during Project construction,. FTA, with the assistance of the Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead, shall determine if revisions to the APE are necessary. 1. If FTA determines the APE.requires revision, it:shall submit the draft and final. APE, along with any an documentation, to MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties. for review and comment pursuant to Stipulation III. FTA's determination on the revised APE shalt be final. ii. Revisions to the APE do not require a formal amendment to this MOA. If revised and documented by FTA. pursuant to Subparagraph B.i of this Stipulation, then the revised APE shall replace those found in Attachment. A, distributed to all Consulting Parties, filed with the ACHP, and used throughout the remainder of the Project unless further revisi modifications. ons to the APE are necessary due to Project C. If any new, previously urisurueyed, areas are added to the APE, the procedures in Stipulation X shall be followed to identify historic p the Project roperties that may be affected by X. Additional Survey and Evaluation A: When necessary,. FTA and the Metropolitan Council in consultation with. MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties shall conduct surveys. and evaluation of properties in the APE la account for any areas added to the APE through revisions made under Stipulation IX, the receipt of additional information about known or suspected historic properties in the APE, and when necessary due to delays in. Project construction, as described in Subparagraph. A.ii of this :Stipulation. i. The survey and evaluation shall be performed by SOI-Qualified Professionals appropriate to the resource. types) being identified and evaluated and shall meet the requirements of Stipulation II:A. H. Identification efforts for architecture/history focused on properties built prior to 1979. If the beginning of Project construction is delayed Ibeyond2028, FTA in consultation with MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties shall determine whether Rusli Line BRT 54 USC 4 306108 MpA 21 additional. information that may result in newly identified. historic properties, changes in the finding of effect for a historic ro e P p rty'. or unanticipated effects (e:g., damage) to historic properties. The Metropolitan Council's Preservation.Lead shall assess effects of the Project on historic properties in accordance with the criteria of adverse effect as described in 36 CFR § 800.5(a)(1) and make a recommendation to FTA,, supported by documentation that meets the requirements of Stipulation ILA, The Metropolitan Council's. Preservation Lead shall also recommend to FTA potential measures for avoiding, minimizing, and/or mitigating any adverse effect(s). L As part of the assessment of effects; the Metropolitan Council Is Preservation Lead may reconunend, and FTA may impose, conditions on the. Project to ensure an adverse effect to a historic property is avoided and/or minimized. In some instances, the conditions may similar to those outlined in Stipulations V, VI, and VII. ii. When effects. are assessed following unanticipated effects to a. known or newly identified historic property during Project construction (see Stipulations XIII and .XIV), the Metropolitan Councils Preservation Lead shall use the following guidance, in addition to the criteria of adverse effect, when. making. a recommendation to FTA: a. If the damage does not meet the threshold of an: adverse. effect, a finding of no adverse effect shall be recommended. b. If the damage meets the threshold of an adverse effect, is repairable, and the Property owner agrees to repairing the damage in accordance with the SOI Standards, a finding of adverse effect shall be recommended along with the Standard Mitigation Measure to Repair Unanticipated Damage to Historic Properties in Accordance with SOI Standards (Attachment D) to. resolve the adverse effect. C. If the damage meets the threshold of an adverse effect and any of the following are true, a finding of adverse effect requiring resolution under Stipulation XII shall be recommended; I. The damage involves a National Historic Landmark; 2. The damage cannot be repaired; 3: The historic property must'be demolished in whole or in part; 4. The property owner does not consent to repairing the damage in accordance with the SOI Standards; Rush. Line BRT 54 USC § 3061081VMOA 23 the public to express their views inresolving the adverse effect(s). The FTA,. at.its discretion; may determine that public participation P p pahon under this stipulation is met via Public. review and comment conducted under NEPA, as. amended, and its implementing regulations. i. If consultation identifies a way to avoid the adverse effect(s) entirely through. redesign of a Project element or other means while still meeting the purpose and need of the Project; and the Metropolitan Council and FTA agree,. the Metropolitan Council shall revise the Project plans and FTA, with the assistance. of the Metropolitan Councit's Preservation Lead., shall reassess effects and modify the finding of effect in accordance with StipulationXI. ii. If, through consultation, it is determined the adverse effect(s) cannot be avoided entirely, a Mitigation Planshall be prepared under Paragraph B of this Stipulation. B. The FTA, with the assistance of the Metropolitan Councils Preservation. Lead; shall develop a Mitigation Plan(s) to document the measures identified through consultation under Paragraph A of this Stipulation to resolve the adverse effect(s). Mitigation Plan(s) may be prepared for the: Project as a whole, for individual construction bid packages; and/or far individual or groups of historic properties, as needed. i. A Mitigation Plan. shall outline measures to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate adverse effects to the historic property. Measures may include, but are not limited to, design requirements pursuant to Stipulation V, Consulting Party review of Project elements pursuant to Stipulation. VI, protecting historic properties during Project construction pursuant to Stipulation VII, and mitigation sinxilar to the measures found in Stipulation VIII. When applicable, deliverables required by a Mitigation Plan shall be prepared in accordance. with the requirements of Stipulation ll.A and shall be submitted and reviewed pursuant to the timeline(s) and process outlined. in Stipulation III; or as otherwi Plan. se specified in the Mitigation ii. Upon completion of consultation, FTA shall submit a draft and final Mitigation Plan to the Consulting Parties and the property owner, if applicable, pursuant to Stipulation III. The. Mitigation Plan. shall be considered final follo wing agreement in writing by both FTA and MnSI-IPA. In. lieu,of amending this MOA, FTA shall ensure that the final Mitigation Plan is attached to the MCA in the FTA Administrative Record, distributed to all Consulting Parties, and filed with the ACHP. FTA shall also ensure the Mitigation Plan provisions are carried out by the Metropolitan Council in. order to resolve the adverse. effect(s). Implementation Rush Line .BRT 54 USC. § 306108 MOA 25 C. The Metropolitan Council shall contract with SOI-Qualified. Professionals to evaluate the newly discovered property for eligibility for inclusion in the National Register. For properties with suspected human remains, the consulting archaeologist must coordinate their evaluation with. the OSA's authentication of the burial. In Iieu of a consultant's. recommendation, FTA may assume a property is eligible for inclusion in the National Register fallowing consultation with, or based on input from, MnSHPO and other Consulting Parties pursuant to Stipulation X.A.iii. If an evaluation is performed, the Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead shall provide an eligibility recommendation to FTA within seventy-two. (72) hours of receipt of the consultant's evaluation of the property. FTA shall make a determination of eligibility pursuant to Stipulation X within seventy-two (72) hours of receivingthe recommendation from the. Metropolitan Council Is Preservation Lead. FTA shall submit its National. Register eligibility determination to the. Consulting Parties for review and comment pursuant to Stipulation III. When applicable, FTA shall also follow Stipulation ILC in relation to any properties that may.have religious or cultural significance to a Tribes), L If FTA determines that the property does not meetNational Register criteria, and MnSHPO concurs, construction activities can resume upon receipt of MnSHPO written concurrence with the eligibility determination.and completion of activities required under Paragraph B of this Stipulation, if applicable. if. For all properties determined eligible for the National Register, FTA shall make a Ending of effect pursuant to Stipulation XI and resolve any adverse effects pursuant to Stipulation X1I, In addition to the requirements.in those stipulations, construction activities may resume after completion of activities required under Paragraph. B of this Stipulation, if applicable. XIV. Unanticipated Effects to Historic Propertics A• If Previously known historic properties are affected in an unanticipated, adverse manner during Project construction (e.g-,. damage), all activities shall cease within one hundred (100) feet of the discovery to avoid and/or minimize further harm, to the property. The Metropolitan Council shall include in. Project construction contracts .a requirement for the Project Construction Contractor to immediately notify the. Metropolitan Council of the effect and implement interim measures to protect the property from damage, looting, and vandalism. Measures may include, but are not limited to; protective fencing, covering of the property with appropriate materials, and/or posting of security personnel. The Metropolitan Council shall notify FTA within twenty-four (24) hours of receiving notification from the Construction Contractor, FTA shall then notify MnSHPO, other Consulting Parties, and the property owner. The Metropolitan Council shall ensure a historic property inspection Rusli Line BRT 54 USC § 306I08 MOA 27 in accordance with the SO! S#andards, which would a Mitigation Measure to Repair Unllow the use of the Standard anticipated Damage to Historic Properties in Accordance with SOI Standards (Attachment D). XV. Reviewing and Reporting of Agreement Implementation A. Every three (3) months following the execution of this MOA and until it expires or is terminated, the Metropolitan Council shall provide FTA and all the Consulting Parties a summary report detailing work undertaken pursuant to its terms. Subject to the confidentiality. requirements. in 54 USC § 307103 and 36 CPR §` 800.11(c), each report shall include an itemized listing of all measures required to implement the terms of this MOA. For each action, the report shall identify what steps. the Metropolitan Council has taken during the reporting period to implement. those actions and identify any problems or unexpected issues encountered, any scheduling changes proposed, any disputes and objections submitted or resolved,: and any changes recommended in implementation of this MOA and/or any Mitigation Plan(s) prepared under Stipulation. XII..Each report shall also include name and contact information for the Metropolitan Council's Preservation Lead as noted in Stipulation II.B,i, a timetable of activities proposed for implementation within the following reporting period, and notices of the initiation. of construction for individual construction bid packages, as applicable. B. The Consulting Parties shall review the reports pursuant. to the timelines established in Stipulation III. The Metropolitan Council shall post the reports on the Project website, or other means as appropriate, in order to obtain public input and shall share any comments received from the public with the Consulting Parties. C. At its own discretion, or at the request of any Signatory, FTA may convene a meeting to facilitate review and comment on the reports, and to resolve any questions about their content and/or to resolve objections or concerns. NVI, Dispute Resolution A. Should any Consulting Party object at any time to any actions proposed or the manner in which. the. terms of this MOA are implemented, FTA shall consult with such party to resolve the objection for a period not to exceed fifteen (1 S) calendar days. This resolution timeframe may be extended by mutual consent between FTA and the Consulting Party, with notification to. the other Consulting. Parties. B. If FTA and MnSHPO do not agree on the National Register eligibility of a.property, or if FTA and a Tribe that attaches religious and cultural significance to a historic Property do not agree on a property's National Register eligibility; FTA. shall submit .Rush Line BRT 54 USC § 306108 MOA 29 the final signature by the Signatories and Invited. Signatories: Copies of an amendments shall be provided to alI the Consulting Parties and the ACH P.Y XVIII. Duration A. This MOA shall remain in effect from the date of execution for a period not to exceed ten 0 0) years. If FTA anticipates that.the terms of thiMOA within this timeframe, it.shall notify the Consuls cannot be comting Parties in Writingat pleted (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date. This MOA may be ee least sixty written concurrence of the Signatoxt ries and Invited. Signatories. nded. by the B. The FTA shall ensure the MOA is extended if all the Stipulations have not been completed. If this. MOA expires and FTA elects to continue with the undertaking,, FTA shall reinitiate Section 106 consultation in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800. C. If, prior to the expiration,date; FTA determines all the activities subject to this MOA are completed, then FTA may terminate this MOA pursuant to Stipulation XIX. XIX. Termination A. If all terms of this MOA have been completed prior to the expiration date, FTA may terminate, the MOA with notification to: Signatories, Invited Si natories y Concurring Parties. that the terms of the MOA have been Completed, and Party feels MOA termination Consultiis premature, or that the terms of the MOA have not g been met, they shall respond within the time frames outlined in Stipulation II I. II. B. Any Signatory or invited Signatory may terminate this MOA by providin at leas thirty (30) calendar clays notice to all Consulting Parties. FTA shall consult with the Signatories and Invited Signatories during the thirty (30) calendar day notice period in an attempt to seek agreement on amendments or other actions that would avoid termination. In the event of termination; FTA, USACE, FHWA, and an d Federal agencies invited to be a Consultin p anyother with 36 CFR g g arty under Stipulation I shall comply §§ 80Q.3-8�0.1.3. with re and to the undertaking covered by this MOA,XX. Execution A. This MOA may be executed in counterparts, with a separate page for each Consultin Party. This MOA shall become effective on the date of the final signature g Signatories and Invited Signatories. The refusal of an e by the this MOA does not invalidate this MOA. The FTA, shall ,isto concur with is Provided with a fully executed copy of this MOA and that the :final MOAIting u datparty to appendices, and any amendments are f led with the ACHP. p Rush Line.BRT 54 USC § 306108 MOA 31 Attachment A Project. Overview Downlown White Bear Lake t N4:' WHITE SEAR :.A Whitaker. Street CedarAvenur County Road E Btrerkie Road St John's ;f Boulevard . Myr6od Alai! - Tapisrana�bCentt!r klgttway36 ir`i'�` as Frost Avenue Gt. Larpenteur Avenue .0 K ' Maryland AvenuE Arcade Cayuga Street Cook Avenue. Street K Airy Payne Street Avenue Olive . SAIN) PAijL Street 14fh Street tOlh Street a 6thf6th Street Union " Depot Project assumes co -location with Bruce. Vento Trail Rush Line BRT 54 USC § 306108 MOA Attachment C Historic Properties in the APE Inventory or Site No. Property Name Address city Effect Finding RA-SPC-4580 Lowertown Historic. Roughly bounded b Y Saint Paul No Adverse District Shepard Road, Effect with Kellogg Boulevard; Conditions Broadway Street, 7th Street, and Sibley Street RA-SPC-5225, Saint Paul' Union 214 East 4th. Street Saint Paul No Adverse RA-.SPC-6907 Depot Effect with RA-SPC-5462 Pinch, Van.Slyck and 360-366 Wacouta Saint Paul Conditions McConville.Dry Street I�Io Adverse Goods Company Effect RA-SPC-8364 Saint Paul, Urban Roughly between 6th Saint Paul No Adverse Renewal Historic Street; Kellogg District .Boulevard, Wabasha Effect Street, and Jackson Street RA-SPC-3168 First Farmers and 332 Minnesota Street Saint Paul No Adverse Merchants National Bank Building Effect RA-SPC-4645 FirstNationai Bank 332 Minnesota Street Saint Paul No Adverse of Saint.PauI RA-SPC-3I67, Pioneer and Endicott 322 Mo North Robert Saint Paul No Adverse RA-SPC-3169, I Buildings Street, 141 East 4th RA-SPC-5223, Street, 1.42 East 5th, Effect RA-SPC-6 3 Street RA-SPC-3Q 17 Manhattan Building 364 North Robert Saint Paul No Adverse (aka Empire Street. Building) Effect RAWC=3171 Golden Rule 85-95 7th Place Saint Paul No Adverse Department Store Building Effect RA-SPC-3174 Foot, Schulze & R)O North Robert Saint Paul No Adverse Company Building Street RA-SPC-6330 Produce Exchange 523 Jackson Street Saint Paul Effect No Adverse Building Effect Rush Line BRT 54 USC § 306108 MOA Inventory or Site No. Property Name Address City Effect Finding RA-SPC-0455 3N1 Administration 777 Forest Street Saint Paul No Adverse Building (3M Main Plant, Building 21) Effect RA-SPC-10850 Phalen Park i 60.D Phalen Drive Saint Paul No Adverse Effect with RA-SPC-8497, Johnson Parkway Johnson Parkway from Saint Paul Conditions No Adverse RA-SPC-5685 Indian Mounds Park to Effect with Lake Phalen Conditions Conditions Site 21 RA70 Gladstone Shops. Southwest corner of Na Adverse (Gladstone Savanna Frost Avenue and Effect Neighborhood English Street Preserve) RA-MWC-O 134 Moose. Lodge 963 1946 English Street Maplewood No Adverse North Effect with RA-MWC-0I06 Madeline L. Weaver 2135 Binghamton Maplewood Conditions' No Adverse Elementary School Street Effect with RA-WBC-003I Polar Chevrolet 1801 County Road.F White Bear Conditions No Adverse Bear/Paul R. Bear East Lake Effect ,3 FTA originally found that the Project would have.No Adverse Effect to .Moose Lodge 963; MnSHPO did. not concur. FTA.in consultation with MnSHPO and other Consulting. Parties developed conditions to .ensure the. Project would avoid adverse effecfsto the historic property. Those: conditions are reflected in this MOA. Rush Line BRT 54'USC § 306108 MOA CITYOF GEM LAKE Claims For Payment Period Ending, gM112021 Gretchen Artig-Swomley,. Mayor Ben Johnson, Council Jim Lindner, Council Len Cacioppo, Council Laurel Amlee, Council Torn Kelly, Treasurer General Fund 55,886.25 Parks & Playgrounds 0100 2004 Debt Service Fund 0,00 21006 Debt Service Fund 0,00 2015 Debt Service Fund 0.00 20.17 Debt Service Fund 375, 00 2018 Debt Service Fund 3750 Improvement Fund .0 87 2.00 Scheuneman Road. Improvements ,375 Hoffman Road. improvements .00 Sewer Fund 0.00 Water Fund 3,24 8.78 Investment Trust Fund 0 00 Total All Funs 0 00 147,777,07 Claims for Payment Check Numbers 11548 & 11550 through 11576 Added Bank Payment of $585.47 to Genera! Fund for purchase of Checks r of D1 Ib a C O LO O . co r O f- r C co O7 (M (a (O N N (V � (n N o0 N N r r O c 0 1� CO 9 16 QLo 000 ct' y-+ M M r r i3 U +' 7 O 00 M co N O w u7 U� O O O co lf) �' r O O l(7 C5 O csi L (+7 A cd (6 M M ni o0 ((i N 00 f� N ni r r O ((') to to 0 M .Q q N N, ti 00 � 00 N •.r co, m r n .fl a1 d U Z 04 w .y w r N co N 4Q a Of 0. j h J ❑ ¢ O 0 co J_ � m M O m �w.a) -J 2— W F-- Lu Z U) a 0 O ca. w f- r � w ll 0 z w. � fA E Q: o. E O_ O ¢i zZ'U �ww " Qb-i- UZZU 2 Y.0 Q C7 as U 3 Ocn pw 3 cn C •- ° w u� °3 N Z a pa �-' Oww 0 C7u� JZU 0 �- zZ am z z, Q-J ai ti. a' Q cTb Uw � NF-f- N , F- > N a J z F-�0 Ncncn Q �z }w` w ja Jz� J—D Of »s a r- D� who a� �w0 O._ �s� aZ)�,r NO ain0. U ww LLZ J NLL a �'�� COQQ a a- w— N ro (0<< C7UJ 4D�a L] Q� al. Fa�w. Qo z� U. � � ❑ O. a�� �� �V=J� TT W0.w LLJO Oz -10 �� i10 J�x N r a Ow o— Uaa ��' wwQ wiu �Q¢ a �VW as �ww on �� 5r No (� v�o M Zoo o�C7 00QM U WCO ❑q <vQoo au. wwz 0 0 N o w, � a ._ Q -Z F- 0 (n '• 0 L a Q w o QO O N 03 W O M a('t V •� 0 O �- M M o N N Itn a r M M (D r? N •� �. U O M M t] Lip b0 co M dto O N 0. O a {V co M N h O � O •i, .d a w w ua ,, " CL T 41 N a1 a7 N. 0 to N (u U al b, � .O N V N •(7 4T m U co, f0 U ro V (v (o f4 C (D c (4 _N. c0 C (4 C n alu �� m � -Q ao� �� a (n�EL C w Vf c�0o .(a r ur m 0! .Q r0 U1 o y ASS y .CD .Vl Id^ w Q¢ �JIJ c•n vofU Q C� �UU¢ as U Q Oa U ac 0 ¢ wc�m a c o n, 0 d N N b -4 O o0 N Ql O CA' r. r a •1•-• [n co T ❑ .M 0 0 0 0 M 0000 c? 00 0 trj M qt (V . �r_y I Y G Y. r O C O 00 0000 r IT0 Or V* 0 00 v0 04 vo• 0 T v MD a) �•' ^, p O O c� N 1 N a N. N 1 1 O.o r r N 1 1 I O N tit N 1 I 0 N 0 0 0 r r N. I 11 O I' N p I' N f a cj N I. r.a � (11 V- N 1 (o a o a o 0 o 0 0 o 000 a000 0 oa 0 0 0 0 00 0o 00o a00o aC5 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 0o 00 a o a. 0 0 a F S fG a r r r r- iQ cp r T^ r e" r r .r t-• (p cp r r r Y r r r r s- t-- Y r r tp � (p. N N r r- r t-• r r r- r. r ❑ ar ai O7 rn �i Ci9 O`i rn rn l M Q v �O C M w to Q I N o 0 10, (a r Cl) CA CF) o o LO O O O V) l[]. tf) (C7 O) 0 O h C� Cj7.((j O Cn (M (o (a O N 0 CYl C*) Cl) � (a N 0) CD N 03 r N � r r• r CA oQ Co N '00 O m O 0 0 LS) 0 00 C) M to (M O Q 00 M Cf) LO CD 0, O co In K) O 00 (O v w to LO C) co O a V) M (() td 6 lf), r d Cn ai OD O 0 m O N 6 C7 00 Ch N� LO t` N N Nt•IWOr (O to N m (o �0tlM M (M I� Co V V- t� r V V) CC7 C\ r r r ti r 00. 00 � r W W t Q 0 D� O. Mi Q Q m U m. ti r Z. :Z U >?M co to Z r W J J W� CL V oo �0 Of SOW U U Q) * La a s j c 0 . W� (�C7ZZ.Z.w r c zz O Z L(3 �W¢.� Q W W w »a: N .O U Ca to . W LU — (A W �F ? 0 ��W u) W(oLu'Q c �Z gY to LU W W'>COM p-Z c ���FF- U N XN.C. LLI omega 3 ¢O U aD �W ` zz.»� N m �� �y.�z� L-- a¢m � r 0 0 r ��Qm co 3 F +--n � � `a w c O [� Z to CO,F- 5 -J n. to N o () co Ow ZZQQQ.d1 �� Z- W Z Z_U` N Qr�C]d. W �:� wU �WW.L OW `� OO22T �rti a o¢�¢Qh¢�m ¢SZ [i m ~ Ci N �L<LL ZZ'N (1iN(11(/lUJ Ll ro mU �� ULUJ(Aiil LL=w(!}-�. 4 C) O(p Q E rrr NNU.UULU U Ci�0.00d�Q}-mt1U}� =OfL)02 CI} S Vk:(n V) Of NNNU N Nr Nco 000 0 N LO N •ct J Lo Cr() LCY LO o ¢ [7 z a O y _ N U 8 a a� o sa m m ai aNi •a �' a� m ai 8 as o 'z 0) m o m m o U a,() n �� c(0 Lu 03.0 CL c. on 00 � m o �� m a ro c *- � ao $ ro m f° 3 a) M ro Ql o o m (� 0) CP1 m �. a CL o p .a. Q� C..Qi zu 4 U r 0. m 0 cn — co w C C y 42 a y o m rn cn c c¢ Mcucn j c 2 c m� Li1C riia ro`ai�c fQS� (U{� . Z Uo 0 2 � c c :_ a) L��3 N a pa in (p�� a = U) � (d (J L4 6C Q Itl �L U w U .O O C C 'j (�. O Q U .G (J O A) U. U Q Lt rLUUU¢ (LQ U U ia`ii mO ¢ U U ¢ O¢ ¢¢ UQ of ¢ Q0 d C)lM470 a Y O ti7 h Coe-N N O 00 C? Ca 0 N N r M (!) O N O o r^ r m(O M [) Cl) ro MMMN N M Cf) MMd) f i �. 1 1 4 < O O o0000O 00 O O O 00r0 0 O C]00 60 00 60 0000 0 O 0000a0 00 V' Nt O 0000 0 C) C]OO O0 00 r0 0000 0 N O O r t- r N C)]. N 0 M CA Cn LO V M N O ■" N N Cn N M N � N r N. N _N N 0 C-1hC)0O.0 r0 r.. r- r- wr:Nr 0 0 O.O.O wQ NO r0 NNN0 N N rrrN N: cfi �j c� N rN� �N ` loll 'TN I" It N CD 4 U[ 6 0 C7 . CD O O CD CDr r• r 6 O C) � CD C:CD 0 C)OO O.00 00 C)O O C?:0:00 0 o CD CD 00 00 00 C)000 r r M M.M M. w w .ter r r s- +r•• ww w r St..s"' t^r w Y.w rr rrr r N ` N C . 0) CA ��, III 9116121 at 11:08;39.67 Page: 1 City of Gem Lake Check Register For the Period From Aug 24, 2021 to Sep 30, 2021 Filter Criterla Includes: Report order Is by Rate. Check # Date Payee Cash Account Amount 11548 8/24/21 Gretchen Arlig-Sworn 100-10100 532,58 T1488 9/3121 Melissa Lawrence 100-10100 1,144.90 11515V 9/15121 WHITE BEAR TOWN 100-10100 -231.05 11547 9117/21 Melissa Lawrence 100-10100 1,082.85 11550 9/21/21 City of Roseville 10b-10100 482.17 11.551 9121/21 City of White Bear La 100-10100 9,273.74 11.552 9/21121 Corporate Mechanica 100-10100 263.00 11553 9/21121 bell Marketing L.P. 100-10100 778.76 11554 9/21/21 Ehlers & Associates 100-10100 7150.00 11555 9/21/21 FRESH PAINT 100-10100 850,00 11556 9/21/21 CINTAS 100-10100 8.24 11557 9/21121 GREEN LINE SERVI 100-10100 270.00 11558 9/21/21 Innovative Office Sol 100-10100 220.99 11559 9/21/21 JAN-PRO CLEANIN 100-10100 225.00 11560 9121/21 Kelly & Lemmons, PA 100-10100 2,588.37 11561 9/21/21 League of Minnesota 100-10100 762.00 11562 9/21/21 Melissa Lawrence 100-10100 7,52 1:1563 9/21/21 Metropolitan Council 100-10100 3,236.63 11564 9/21/21 MOLNAU TRUCKIN 100-10100 81,966.59 11565 9/21/21 METRO PLUMBING 100-10100 8,251.14 11566 9/21121 NEI ELECTRIC 100-10100 1.,750.00 11567 9/21121 Gopher State One Ca 100-101.00 12A5 11568 9121/21 Press Publications 1.00-101.00 127,19 11569 9/21121 Ramsey County 100-10100 ljl66;00 11570 9/21121 SEH 10&10100 24,030.48 11571 9121121 SIPS Works 100-10100 82.60 11572 9121121 ULiNE 100-10100 67.58 11573 9/21/21 Waste Management 100-10100 675,36 11574 9/21121 White Bear Township. 100-10100 4,273.5.1 11575 9/21/21 WHITE BEAR TOWN 100-101.00 231,05 11576 9/21 /21 Xce1 Energy 100-10100 652.03 11577 9121/21 Gretchen Artig-Sworn 100-10100 554.10 MEMORANDUM Date; September 15, 2021 To: Mayor and City Council From: Tom Kelly, Treasurer Re: Second Quarter 2021 Financial Report realized I never provided the City Council with a first quarter financial report, which makes this report al] the more important that I keep the Council up to date on the City's financial position, The City's revenues are above budget and expenditures are below budget, Part of the reason revenues are above budget is the utility rate increase and building permit revenue already collecting 55% of their 2021 budget. The key to the City's finances are that even though we are 50% through the year, revenues and expenditures do not. flow evenly though the year. There. are some one-time expenditures, which are spent at the beginning of the year, and expenditures for snow plowing activities, wh!ch.are spent during the first and fourth quarters of the year, which makes the City look like it may over or under spend its budget, but over the course of the year, will actually be in line with budgeted amounts, Likewise, on the revenue side sewer and water billing revenues are only received once a quarter. Below is a chart comparing budget to actual revenue and expenditures for the years 2020 and 2021. ALL FUN DS Revenues 2020 2020 % 2021 2021 Budget Actual Received Bud et Actual Received General Fund 34,024.98 229,921.53 575:74% 23,424.96 25,933.25 110.71% Special Revenue Fos 45,662.00 317M 0.700% MOM 123.74 6187% Debt Service Funds 41,192.50 76,554.09 185.84% 76,160.50 308.08 0.40% Capital. Project Funds 33,1a00 22,331.42 67.429/a 13,500.00 3i;666.99 234.57% Enterprise Funds 31,165.00 27,11631 87.01% 35,375.00 22,628.97 63.971Y. Total 185,169.48 356,M1,83 192.39% 148,660,46 80,661.03 54.26%, Expenditures 2020 2020 % 2021 2021 % Budget � . Actual Sent p , „—_,_... budget Actual Spent.. General Fund 259,569.00 239,693.63 53.82% 246,192.48 212,763,09 86.42% Special Revenue Fds 52,500.00 0;00 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00 0.00%, Debt Service Funds 63,732.50 106,862.50 167.67%, 65,632,50 123,065.00 187,51% Capitai Project Funds 30,512.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 15,244:69 0.00% Enterprise Funds 52,475.00 12,078.24 23.02% 90,D45.00 22,297.41 24.76% Total 458,788.50 258,634.37 56.37% 402,869.98 373,370.19 92.68% It should be noted that the budget amounts are for half the year's budget and the actual is year to date. Also the General Fund revenues in 2020 include an advance payment of the July tax settlement due. to Covid719. The rest of the report will detail the revenues and expenditures of each of six fund types. GENERALFUND For the second quarter, revenues are above budget projections and. expenditures are below, budget, which is show in future charts. However, the chart on the following page shows how Revenue Comparision :/f /// // M 2619:Budget a WAActual * 2020 Budget m 2020Actual M 2021 Budget u 2021 Actual The good news is.that actual expenditures for the second quarter remain below the 2021 budget and 2020 budget amounts, but are higher than 2020 actual amounts as shown in the charts below: 2020 2020 % :2021 2021 % Budget Actual Spent Budget Actual Spent General Government 122,239.50 82,553.25 .67.53% 134,878.00 137,933.59 102.27% Public5afety 73,37950 56,442.70 76.92% 74,864.48 62,506.14 83.49% Public Works 63,950.00 697.68 1.09% 36,450.00 12,323,36 33,81% Total 259,569,00 139,693.63 53.82% 246,192.48 212,763.09 86.42% Expenditure Comparision s00poo.oa 700,000.00 600,000.00 500,000.00 400,OOb.00 300,000.00 206,000:00 100,00().00 0.00 akA Jai ate CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS The Capital .Project Funds have revenues of $31,666.99, which is from the $25,000 transfer from the General Fund and interest earnings. For 2021 the expenditures are for the Hoffman Road repaving project. ENTERPRISE FUNDS The City's Enterprise Funds now consist of the Sewer Enterprise Fund and the Water Enterprise Fund, Revenues are below last year revenues and are 31:98% of budgeted revenues. Revenues totaled $22,628.97 for the first half of 2021 compared to $27,116.01 last year: Revenues below last year are SAC and WAG charges on new construction. Expenses for the year are. above last year's expenses but are only 12.38% of budgeted expenditures. Keeping in mind that the expense.budget for the Sewer and Water Enterprise Funds includes depreciation, which is not recorded until year-end. The main expense is the M.C,E.S. charges for sanitary sewer treatment: The City has a budget of $38,840 for these charges and have paid 57.28% or $22,245.90 for this line item. Overall, the sanitary sewer and water funds should finish the year with revenues near budget and expenses below budgeted amounts. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Finally, the City had $1,291,696.39 invested as of June 301,t. This compares to $1,129,752.03 invested last year at this time. The investments had an average interest rate of 1.66% ( compared to 2,64% last year. Interest rates remain low with the highest interest rate on municipal bond of 3.73%. The chart below shows the City's invested funds for the last four years. 1,600,000:00 1i IEi 1� a1 1 a/ la 1 ae $ Invested A NA -2018 — 2019 - 2070 -2021 CITY OF GEM LAKE .CASH AND INVESTMENT BALANCE STATEMENT As of 0101 /2021 Fiscal'Year: 2021 Cash and Investments Balance Balance .Name of Fund 8/1/2021 Receipts Disbursements 8/31/2021 General Fund $294,574.35 $7,953.89 $50,910.94 $251,627.30 Parks and Playgrounds $431 3.95.812 $0.00 moo $43,395.82 2004 Debt Service Fund $0:00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2006 Debt Service Fund $0,00 MOO $0.00 $0.00 2007 Capital Improvement Bands $115,183.46 $0.00 $0.00 $115,783.46 2018 Inprovement Bonds $39,482.81 $0,00 :$0.00 $39,482.81 Improvement Fund $495,789.19 $0.00 $679.79 $485,109A0 City Hall Construction $0:00 $0.00 $0.00 $0:00 Scheuneman Road Improvemetns $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Koffman Road. Improvements $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sewer Enterprise Fund $466,493.16 $8290,67 $3,240.68 $471,543.15 Water Enterprise Fund ($70,598.25) $2,333.80 $33.21 ($68,297.66) Investment Trust Fund $649.01 $3,454.00 $0.00 $4j 103,01 $1,375,569.55 $22,042.36 $54,864.62 $1,342,747:29 Premier Checking Premier CD's UBS Investments. UBS Money Market Gambling Fund Balance BALANCE STATEMENT OF GAMBLING FUNDS Balance 8/1/2021 $6,043,08 Receipts Disbursements $0.00 $2,473.58 $750,644.33 $0,00 $547,000.00 S39,102.06 $1,342,747.29 Balance. 8/31/2021 $3,1569.50 `City of Gem lake GENERAL FUND Budgeted. Statement of Revenues and. Expanditures For the Eight Months, Ending August331, 2021 rr Math CSIITL mli CurrTMnth =I YT¢ PVE_M &udeet. Actual Yarance %Comnlele Bucket MW Vance %C9moleie Property Taxes. Current Property Taxes Del inq Property Taxes $ 36,108.75 $ 0100 0.00 36.108,75 0,00 $ 413,305.00 $ 212,937,82 220,367.18 49.14 Fiscal Disparity Taxes 1,019.17 0,00 0.00 0,00, 1.019;17 0.00 0.00 0;00 11,230,00 10.86 4X8.30 (10:86) 7,301.70 Ho 40,30 Licenses and Permits General Business Licenses 166.67 0.06 166,t 7 0,00 2,000.00 475.00 1,525.00 2175 On -Sale Liquor License 450X0 O.OQ 450;00 0.00 3;40D.00 3.60.31 1,716.69 68.21. Other PermiIs Tobacco License 106.00 0.00 100,00 0.00 1,2DOA0 995,00 215.00 .82108 Charitable Gambling License. 0,00 41.67 0,00 1,000.00 0.00 (958.33) 0100 2,400.00 Oil 500,00 260.0D 1,500.00 (200.00) (1,006,00) 0.00 300.00 Contractor License 100,00 0;00 100,00. 0;00 1,200.00 1,200,00 0,00 100.00 Building Permits i Permits 666.67 29.50 637,17 4.43 8,000.00 4,780.20 3,219,80 59,75 Mucha is Mecltanical permits 83.33 125.00 0.00 0,00 83.33 125.00 0.00 i,000,Op 1,90.00 810.00 19.00 Electrical Permits 66.67 (86.40) 153,07 0,00 (129.60) 1,500.00, 800.00 2,177;33 294,60 (677.33) 505A0 14 I6 36,83 NPDES Permit 8133 0,60 .8:33 0.00 100.00 0,00 100.00 0,00 Fire Marshall Inspection 208,33 0.00. 2003 6,00 2,560,00 107,00 2;393.00 4.28 Septic. Inspection Fee 166.67: 40.00%. 126.67 24:00 2;000,00 3,640,00 (1,640,00) 182;00 State Permit Charge Sewer Contractor License 4.17 2.50 1,67 60,00 50.00 84.26 (34,26) 168.52 Rental Licensing 4,17 33,33 .0;00 000 4:17 33,33 0,06 0.00 50:00 400.00 0.00 0,00 50.00 400.60 0.00 4.D0 Dog Licenses 12.50 20.00 (7,50) 160.00 150.00 450,00 (300.00) 300.00 Intergovernmental Revenues County Grants &.Aids 0.00 0.00 O;DO 0100 0.00 11.91 (11.91) 0.00 SCORE Recycling Grant 83.33 O,Op 83.33 0.00 1,000.00 0,00 1,000.60 0:00 Cable TV Franchise Fees 506.00 0.00 506.66 0,00 6,000;00 8,436A3. (2,436143) 140,61 CARES 17[JN1]S 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,454.26 (26,454,26) 0.00 SMALL CITIES AID 0.00 0.00 0;00 0,00 0,00 7,315.50 (7;315:50) O.pO Charges for Services Planning Fees 16.61 0.00 16.67 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 0400 Plan Review 254.00 0.00 250,00 0.00 3,000,06 1,151;02 1,848,98 33,37 ZoningCharges 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 275.00 (275,00) 0.00 Investment Admin Charge 16.67 0.00 16.67 0.00 200,00 163:99 36.01 82,00 Fines and Forfeits Fines 91.67 O.W 91.07 0:00 t;100,00 164,17 935,83 14.92 mikiollaneous Interest Earnings 416.67 0.00 416A7 0.00 51000,00 976492 4,023,08 19.54, Miscellaneous 41.67 0,00 4L67 0.00 SD0;00 326,00 174.00 fi5.20 Insurance Policy 17iv1dends 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.00 (68.00) 0.00 Facility Rental 250.00 21738.21 (2,488.21) 1,095.28 3,0000 21763.21 236,79 9111 Total Revenues 41,03208 3.7481 _ 37;288,27 9, I2 492 385.00 285 750.09 206 634,91 58.03 E PE- MATURES City Council Wages and Salaries 625,00 O.OD 625;00 0.00 7,50HO 3,740.60 3,160.00 49.87 Employer Paid Insurance, 47.83 0,00 47,83 .0.00 574,00 275.40 298.66 47.98 Adminstration 41.67 0:00 41.67 6,00 500,00 0.00 500,00 0.00 Conference Registrations 8:33 59.00 (50.67) 70S,00 100,00 79,00 21,00 79.00 Council Contingency 833.33 0.00 833,33 0:00 1MOO.,00 0.00 .1U00,00 0.04 Elections Operating Supplies 12.50 000 1150 0,00 15O,Q0 0,60 150,00 0,00 Contracted Services 833;33 1,166.00 (332,67) 139.92 10,000.00 2,332.00 7,668,00 23:32 Legal Notices I2:50 0,00 12.50 0.00 150.00 (58,99) 208,99 (39.33) Repairs & Maint - Contractual 208;33 0,00 208.33 0.00 2,500,00 926:07 1,573.93 37.04 9/1512021 at 2:46 PM Tuilding Iupsect(on WAGES & SALARIES: FICA. CONTRIBUTIONS PE -RA CONTRIBUTIONS WORKERS COMPENSATION Building Inspections Building Secretary Computer Services Oli;ce Equip &'Furnishings Road Mnintennuce Signs, Sign Repo irMaterials Engineering, Engineering Streetlights ROW Maintenance StreetRcpairs Blvd Tree Trimming Duas & Subscrintons. Ice and Snow Removal Salt and Sand Repairs & Maint - Contractual . Snow Plowing Pnrk.Maintennnce PARK MAINTENANCE- CONTRACTUAL Other Flnsncing Uses Operating Transfers OUT Cityaf Gem, Lake GENERAL FUND Budgeted Statementof Revenues and Expenditures For the Eight Months Ending August 31, 2021 Cummah Cig1 Mnih QLmul m YTD Buda Actual Y.91:lu= %-Cmua�lq B lue w Actual YTD n i i 1�Complete 1,041.67 Hu 1,041:67 0.00 12,500.00 0.00 12,500.00 79,67 0,00 79.67 0;00 956.00 0.00 956.00 78.17 0-00 MI 0.60 938.00 0.00 938.00 15.42 0.00 15.42 Ho 185.00 0.00 185;00 f 1333.33 708.56 624..77 53,14 46,000.00 7.205.44 8,794,56 183,33 0,00 183.33 0.00 2,200;00 1,252,14 947,86 0.00 0;00 0,00 0.00 0.00 2,520,00 (2,520,00) 416,61 0,60 416.67 0.00 5,060,00 0.00 5,000:00 41.67 0.00 41.67 0,00 500.00 62.39 437,61 333,33 0.00 .333,33 .0,00 .4.000.00 0,00 4110001.00 0.00 569.I1 (569,11) 0,00 0.00 5,624,04 (5,624.04) 108.33 65.03 43.30 60,03 I,300.00. 443,75., 856,25 8333 0,00 83.33 0.00 1,000.00 0.00, 1;000,fl0 1,250,00 1,506.00 (250,00) 120,00 15,000,00 3,535.00 11,465.00 666.67 0.00 666,67 0.00 8.000400 2,000.99 5,999.01 8,33 .0.00 8.33 .0.00 100.06 0.00 100,00 1,416,67 0.00 1,416.67 0,00 17,000.00 2,244.06 14 M-94, 208.33 0;00 268.33 0;00 2,500,00 0.00 .2,500;00 1,541,61 0.00 1,541.67 0,00 18,500,00 3,3425 15;.15175 4116.67 0,00 416.67 2,083.33 0,00 2.093.33 0.00 0.60. 0;00 0,00 45.03 56.92 0,00 0.00 12.48 0.00 0.00 34;13 0,60 23,57 25.01 0.00 13.26 0.00 18;10 0,06 5,000,00 .0.00 5.006.06 0.00 0.00 25,000,00 25.000,00 0;00 100.00 Total Expenditures 41 032.08 44 0,14,01 2 981,93 107.27 492 385.00 297 457.41 194 927.59 60,41 Excess Rev Over (Under) Exp $ 0.00 $ 40;270,26 40,270,20 0..00 $ 0,00 $ 11,707.3211 114707.32 0,00 9/1512021 at 2;45 PM City of Gem Lake 2007 DEBT SERVICE FUND Budgeted Statement oPRevenues and Expenditures For the CighrMonths Ending August 31, 2021 Curr Mnd Qrr Mntlt On Mnth YCiZ. YM Budget Acntal Y_6ttflno °lo Complete Budeet Am Wriano %Complete REVENUES Current Property Taxes $ 6,555501 0;00 (6,555.59) 0,00 $ 78,666M $ 38,687,1 i 39,978,89 49.18 Del! rig uentProperty.Taxes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1.94 (1,94) 0.00 Fiscal Disparities 184.17 0,00 (I84,17) 0,00 2,210.00 895.42 1,314,58 40M lnteres(Earnings 41.67 0100 (4EO) 0.00 500.00 275,03 224.97 55.01 Total Revenues 6,781 0.00 081.33 0.00 81,376,00 39,859,50 41,516.50 48.98 EXPENDI URES Principal 5,000.00 0.00 (5,000,00) 0.00 60,000,00 60;000,00 0.00, 100.00 Interest 1,053,33 0.00 (1,05133) 0,00 12,640,00 12,640.06 0.00 1000 Fiscal Agent Fees 125.00 0.00 (115,00) 0,00 1.500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0,00 Total Expenditures 6,17833 0.00 (6,178.33) 0.00_ 74,140.00 72.640,00 1,500.00 97i98 Excess Rev Aver (Udder) Exp $_ _ 60100 $ 0.00 (60100) 0.00 $ 7,236.00 (S 32,780,50) 40,016.50 (453,02) 91152021 at 2:49 PM City of Gem Lake IMPROVEMENT -FUND, Budgeted Statement omewnues and Expenditures For the Eight Months Ending.August 31,.2021 CzarEAUl UrrMntl , i rah 21 m j.TQ REVENUES a at1dR t � Variance el E3udo Bglilgl yfirinnce COIJIVICIC Current:Special Assessments PR) PA1D SPi GL4L ASSESSMENTS $ 0.60 $ 0,00 0.00 0.00 $ O.OQ $ 18,833.27 {18,833,Z7) 0,90 interest Earnings 0,00 166.61 0,00 0.00 0.00 (166.07) 0,00 0,00 0,60 2,000,60 5,366,32, 1,718.14 (5,366,32) 281.86 0.00 85,91 Transf6rs from Other Funds 2,08133 0,00 (2,083.33) 0.60 25,060.00 25.000,00 0.00 I00.00 Total Revenues 2 250.60 0.00 (2,250.00) 0,00 27,000,00 50 91733 23,917,73 '188.58 FI PTNDITURES ]?ngineering Legal Notice Prepamflan 0.00 0.00 679,79 670,79 0,00 .0,00 15,6681,59 (15,668,54) 0,00 0.00 0.09 0.00 om 255.89 (255,89) 0:00 Total Expenditures 0.00 679,79 679:79 0.00 0.00 15;924,48 15,924.48 0.00 Excess Rev Over (Under) Cxp $ 2,250,60 $ 679.79 (2,929.79) (30,21) $ 27000.00 S 34;9931 (7,993.25] 129.60 911512021 at 2;51 PM City ofGein fake WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Budgeted Statement of Revenues and Fxpenditures. Far'the Bight Months Ending,August31;:2021 i KY NUFS SlI cmnlit. Duldw LUM-Mnffi &ww ian %-Ccmnlete i�il d 1"1 c i r� o e Water -Local WACr $ 41.67 $ 4i6,67 p:00 {41:67) 0,00 $. Soo do $ 0.00 500.00 0100 Residential Water Revenues. 1,000,00 D,00 (4I6.G7) {1;000,OD) 0.00.. 0.00 5,000.00 0:00 5,000.00 0,00 Water tale Charges 0.00 '0.00 0;00 0,04 0.00 12,040;00 .00 7,526,74 4,473.26 60.00 Interest Earnings 4,1710 0.00 ( 0.0p 0,00 i32,67 (152.67) 0.00 50.00 (197.25) 247.25 (394.50) Total Revenues 1.462,50 0,00 1462.50 0.00 17 550,00 7,482.16 10 067,84 42;63 EXPENNDITURF;S Water. MeterSuppl]es Auditing Services 4167 000 4167 ( ) 4.00 500,00 0,00 5m.00 0,00 Administration 41.67 0.40 0,00 0.00 {41,67) 0.00 500.00 0:00 500.D0 '0.00 Wntairs,& rUtilities 2.,916,67 33,21 0.00 (2,883.46) 0.00 1.14 0.00 203.50 (263,$0) 0;00 Repairs ti hfaint Depreciation 291.67 0,00 (291.67) 0,00 35,000.00 31500,00 13,207,17 0.00 21,79M3 37,73 2,083.33 0.00 (2.083.33) 0,00 25,000.00 0.00 3,500.00 25;000;40 0;00 0.00 Total.Eatpendilures 5,375.00 33.21 S34f.74 0162 64516.00 13,410;67 51089.33 20,70 Excess Rev Over (Under) ExP $ 3;912.50 ($ 33,21 „ 3,879.29 O;BS $ 46 930.00 $ 5 928.51 41 021,49 12;63 910=21 at 2:44 FM