Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 resolutionsCITY .OF GEMt LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2606-01 17 January 2006 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING iNDIVIOUALS AND FIRMS TO PC, RFORM TiaFt*CTIONS NECCS:SARY FOR THE.GOVERNING BODV OFTH.E CITY OF` GEM LAKE, RAMSF;V .COUNTY; MINNESOTA. WHEREAS; the hi.dividuals and/or companies identified bdloW have agreed to serve in the appoitited positions identified for the purial 01 laauary 2006 to 3I Decetnber 2006, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RES:OLVED.:tharthe City Council of the City of Gem Lake.does liereby make the following appointments: 01) Actina Mayor (In The Mayor's Abse ice) Councilor Hutch.SchilIing 02) Chiel'i3uild.im,Offic.ial Mr. AllenZepper 113) Buildin_ inspectors Mr. Allen Zepper,.Ms. Cindy Shilts; Mr. Jint,ylantetlfel 04) l'iumbffli; Inspector Mr: Allen Zepper; Ms, Cindy Shilts 05) IS I'S Inspector (New Systems) Ms. Cindy Shilts. 06) ISTS Inspector (Bi-Appual Inspections) M.r. Dale.Eklin 07) lvlechanicaUNVAC Inspector Mr, Allen Zipper, Ms. Cindy Shifts. 08) Electrical Inspector Mr. ,Iim.Manteufel. Summit Lnspecti.otis 01Y) 1Veed Inspector Mi. Paul.Eineoit Io) ANs ktant Weed Inspector Mr, Frederic. Magnuson (Magnuson & Assooiates, LLC) 11) .Sej,t�iA e Administrator Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates.,. I;LC) 12) ('o-lanifi; Administrator Mr. Paul Emeott 1.3) ( o-Zonin-) Administrator Mr: Frederic Magnuson (,Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 14) NPDFS Inspector Mi. Paul Emeott .15) ~ewer lnsptction/Mainteriance Contractor t/ b/ a 16) gnaw Ploxving & Sanding Contractor T..A.:Schifsky & Sons, Inc. I j) Cominimity Healfh-Officer Dr. Roland Birkebak. 18} ('ii%Prosecuting Attorney Mellow &.O.Ison, LLF 19) City Attorney Leonard, O'Brien. Spencer, Gale & Sayer 20) Cif1 'IIe,lsttrer W. Sarah Cobian 21 y G'itClerk Mr. Freder c Magnuson 221 C it. t ?l'I cQ,; << Contract Adininistrators Magnuson &.AssiiciatesR 331 ('i(s l .mincers Short, EIIiott &t. Hendrickson 2'a) 01% 1'ia,ulcr Short, Elliott &.Hendricksgn ,;) t )1"Neill City Ueposiioty Premier Bank, Whlte�$ear Lake 2(1) 011+cial Citv Publication White Bear Press 2. ) Planning C..ol1unissi.on Mr..Jack Hoesch#er, Chairman Mr. Arri Lindner Mr..Derek Wippich Ms: Kathy Robins Mr. Craig ltaffe y 28) (;'ilk Roc•.clitlg C.dritractor Waste Managenient, Inc, 3n) I,a w l:ni01cement Contractor Ramsey County Sheriff 30) Laws 1•.nforcenienl Representative. MK. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, Ut 31) 1"Ne, 1 irc .Marshall &. Paramedic Contractor White Bear Lake Fire Department :32.) C'ir. Code t nfbrcement Mr. Frederic Magnuson.(Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 33) ,.lttit1ial Control Officer Mr. Frederic:Maenuson (MI apnumi & Associates. LLC) 34) Public Works .Commissioner Mr. Jim Lindner :;�) R;unscv (`011111y.E,eague of -Local Governments ,Mayor Paul Emeott, Director 2006 Councilor Toin Rasmgssen, Alternate, 2Q06 3()) b'1.:AWMO Representative Mr. Paul Cnieptt 31j Archilecture.. & Landscape Consultant Mr. Craig Raffirrty Page 3 of 7 Rcsolution No. 2006-01. 17,1aytuary 2006 T'he fore,,tiiii; Resolution was.offered by Councilor Watsoir and was supported by C.aunciior Bosrrk an-d-% s declared rarlopre(i laird upon the following vote. .NAME SCft] J II.4 RASM:[iSSEN VOTE. Aye Aye Aye. Aye Aye ATTEST 1. frcderic C._ Magnuson; the duly qualified City Clerk ofthe City ofGemLake, County or.Ralnsey, State ofMinoesota, do liereba celli I that the foregoing Resiblution is a true and accurate fepresentation,of`pctign taken by dlte CityCouncil..of the City of'Gedi lake 011 tile dale first written. '97e 40a Frederic C. Magnuson, City Cleric &rtif ieb 7y� ;�006 Date CON c•iile: r��s��lu[ism+?(lU[,�ni�2r;r�t,-EIS CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-02 17 January 2006 A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR CITY ADMINISTRATION OF VARIOtlS FUNCTIONS AND.APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC AS CONTRACT ADMINISTRATORS FOR 2006 IN .ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR`PROPOSAL. WHE EAS, the duties of City Clerk of the City Of Gem fake have dramatically expanded. over the last fifteen years. to incfudcsignificant.additiorial responsibility, and WKERP,AS, the. City Clerk has .over time performed many of these :duties with ott'I.y: inirior consideration of compensation: and WHEREAS, the requirements ofthe City havechanged and grown to*irtclude adminislratlSe and other services bevbad ffte orit.ioal scone tifthe City Clerk's responsibilities.; and WHEIZEAS. M:tign:ttsdtf & Associates.:LLC ltas efectivelyprovided andr manaed tite City's needed administrative and other:services.time 1999. N6WTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED; that theCtttyCouncil ofthe`CityofGem Lake.hereby appoints Magnus.oit �l tlss�,ciates,. I..LC .as an indepeiideni :contractor to provide additional Municipal Management and .Administrative ticrvices as C�ontractAdininistratorduringthe period 01 January 2006 through 31 December 2006 for lees as descrilzed in accordance .with their propos.al.dated 17 January906 and retroactive to 31 Dec ember 2006. The fbregoing. Resolution was offered by Counci for Sclrilllirg.was supported by Councilor Bosak was declared adoliied based: up= the following vote: NA ME :E1VI EOTT ' . : " WA'I'SON: . " :BdsA c. ` ' C`T*FIL ;IN?G. RAiSMUSSEIV VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye A je ATTEST 1. Frederic C. Magauson.. the duly qualified City Clerk of t119 City of G'e m Lake.. County of Ramse " :Stine of Mtmies6ta: do hereby certify.that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation. of action taken .liy die. [`its Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date. first. written. 0 F rtdcr{e C. Magnuson, City Cleirk {tertif leb Page 5: of Date CON. (-rleittr�una�nt>~oofi? CITY Or GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-03 .17 JANUARY 2006 A RESOLUTION' IN SUPPORT OF DESIGNATING VA.DNA-IS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION (VLAWMO) AS .A SPECIALTAXiNG DISTRICT UNDER MINNESOTA STAT.t1TES275.006. WI•IFREAS. VLAWMO. is a Joint Powers ManagenienuOrganization established for tine General Purpose of: to (l ) protect, presetve.and use natur0 surface and groundwater storage and. retention systetns;:.and, (2) minimize ripital e\pendaures necessary to correct flooding and water quality problenis; and, (3) identifyartd piari for means to.e.ffectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality: and, (4) establish more. uniform local:policits and.official controls f0l surface and groundwater management- acid (5.) prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; and (6) promote _,rotindwater recharge; and (7) protect and enhance fish .and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities .and secure wht:r behelits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater: and WHERFAS( members of the joint Powers Water Management Organization currently support VLAWMO through general iitndbudgets .be utility fee budgets; and WHEREAS, VLAWMO members have found this funding :method to' be inequitable with residents outside of VLA WMO jurisdiction paying for two watershed budgets; and WHERP-AS, tile. ab.ilily to levy for planning and implementation -of W.titer Plans and Projects is i#rovided id Water M<tna�etiierit Organizatiotis (WMO) unde.r.Minnesota Statute Section 10113.24); and WHEREAS, VLAVI'MQ has been advised that designation as:a Spe 'tal Taxin&District under Minnesota Statate. Sect ion 2 7 �.666 is requiredto.allowthis Water Management Organization to leyy-atax, with the. precedent ofMiddl:e.Miss iss'ippi WN10: now, therefore, be. it RESOLVED. that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake supports the inclusion of the Vadnais lake Area. \Vater Management Organization under Minnesota.Statules.Section 27.5.066 as a Special.Taxing District through: legislative :�m:ticJn. . The Riregoing Resolution was offered by ( buticiiorSchiili►rg and was supported by Councilor N'nlsgn and was de.&tred rriln ferl based upon the folio wiii ► vote: NAME EMtOTT* W. A, -.1'$(?N R tS.NtVSSE�i:. Sai.I.LLING 86SAK VOTE. At", Aye Aye Af?e. Ape A:TTES'T 1- 1rederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State.:of Nl innesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution. is a true and accurate representation.Qt fiction taken by the Uiiy C:0UrCil ofthe City ofGeni Lake on the date first written. ac'T', -o.9 .,�406 Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date tertif ieb (I111oPB C-(tIC; YLSOIUl101l�tlt}fiNIU�UtI(.a13 Page 6 of 7 CITY OF GEM LAXE. RESOLUTION NO.2006-04 17 January 20Q6 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 'FINAL PAYMENT TO' BELAIR EXCAVATING FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO: 2004-01 AND THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GEM LAKE SEWER INVCSTMENT ACCOUNT TO SUPPORT PROJECT COMPLETION. WH E'RENS, bef Air Excavating flits d6mpl6ted:the work. for which it contracted with the City of Clem Lake to (fie "Zitisfaction of SEH, I nc.. as deinonstratt;d.in the 29 Noveniber 2006 letter from Dave Mitchell to the City acting As Gem lake"`: City and Project Engineers; and WFIEREAS, the balance required tozQmplete paytnents*for the project is S27,217,14 which agrees with accounting. previously approved .with the assessment for this project;. and W11 FREAS, capital required to complete.paynients for the project has primarily been field in thc.Csipital 1'r`ojeets Pond cstab lishc d forthe project which has a. current fialanee of$7,787.42; and IVI•lf It EA& it is the recommendatiomofthe City Administrmor.that the Capital Projects Fund be keptdon witli-funds not to eneed $600.00 for an additional. period of sixty (60) days to provide a vehicle to pay previously approved or- tinittrticili�tted expenses, how, therefore. be if RFS(.)..LVLD..thattlie City Council.ol'the City of Gan Lake does hereby authorize the transfer.of nineteen -thousand burr-hundr d twenty-nine and 72/100ths ($19,429.72) dollars fi`oni the Sewer Investment Fund to the Capital l't•oiccts hiaid: and, be it. FLMTHER. RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gein Lakedoes hereby authorize final payment in the amount of t%vegy-seven thousand two -hundred seventeen and .fourrteen.one-hundredths ($?7 t7:14); dollars; and, be it FLIkn4F.R-RESOLVED that-fhe City Council oftfie.City of Gem Lakedoes hereby order the Capital i'rcjectsf nid closed on or before the last day -of March-2006 for a. period not less that) two (2•): bank statement periods;.and. be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the CityCpun�il.of.the City ofGem Lake does hereby order the Capital-Nojects-Fund re -opened with deposits from investment funds-as-tiecessary to:funher fund Capital Projects ordered fior 2006; arid: be it F 1 ItTH C lt. RESOLVED that the City .Council of the City,ofGem Lake does hereby order al l future. administrative and oilk.ellancdus operating expenses for Public Improvement Project No. 2004.01 to be paid. from the Sewer.Fund. T'Ite. l'bre(oing Resolutions was offered by Couneilbt Watson and was supported by Councilor Bosah acid %vas. o4oprerl based .upon tale: following, vote. NAME i EiMEOTT j WATSOk VOTE ATTr•,ST il$lVI'USSEIV I. SCHILLING B:OSAK I. I rccleric C. Me-Irmison, tlii duly qualified City Clerk of tile: City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey. State of 1•linncsota. do hereby ce.rtifythat the foregoing Resolution is a trtie.and accurate representation of action taken by the ca" C'ounciI of`titc. City of Gem. Lake on the date.first ti}ritteit. if. ZllG4J?. I'VedeHe C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb Qio'P9 Page 7 of 7 i c-tile: reu+i�tti�irtt?OiiGtit«?Gt)/+1t� CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION ". 2066-05 21 February 2006 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE COST SHARING OF CONSULTANT SERVICES TO THE. ONGOING 1-35E.. CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STUDY. W.HEREAS,:fhe.City of Gem Lake has partially funded and participated in the multi;jurisdictibnai study of the 1-3512 Corridor.; and WHEREAS, the City of Getn Lake. has committed to :continue participation. as a tnember in *the I-35:E Conido)r Management Team -and WHEREAS, the Corridor Management Team will continue to coordinate the ongoing balance of land use and transportation within the I-M Corridor; and WHEREAS -continued consultant services will bs required to assist the Corridor Management Team; and WHEREAS, 5l;H, Inc.. has prepared a scope of secvicestgprQvide such assistance at cost to the..Members in 2004 not to exceed $4,50d for budgeted operations: and WHEREAS, the Corridor Management Team has proposed cost sharing contributions from the participating local units of government as follows: the city of Vadnais .Heights (r, 25:0%; the City of White Bear lake@ 25:M. White: Bear Township tit 25.0%, North Oaks @ 18.0.%; and Gem Lake.@ 7.0%; and Wl-I RLAS. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Ramsey County and the Metropolitan Council have agreed to provide iit=kind planning and technical services and project coordination through the course of study.. NOW THEREFORE BE: IT RESOLVED that. the .City Council oftheCity of.Gem Lake agrees to. contribute funding. ;in amount not: to exceed $562.50 for :eonsultantservices from •SEHti10% for the Ongoing 1-35E:Corridor Management study. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported by Councilor Rasrnusserr and wat declared redo retl based upon the followin vote; NAME EM-EOTT` .1NATSON: BOSA K S.CHii�LING: RA8MUS5EN:' VOTE Aye Aye: Absent Abseni .lye ATTEST 1, Frederic C..Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of. -the City of.Getnt Lake, County of.Ramsey, State of Mimiesota,.do herebycertify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation.of action taken Uy the City Council of the.City of Gem lake on the date first written. i Frederic. C. Magnuson, City Clerk &- of f eb Date e-nine: resoltiticwQ000Wl2t "5 Page') of 6 .CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-06 Zi February 2006 A RESOLUTION. DECLARING THE .OFFICIAL INTENTOF THE CITY OF CEM LAKE. RA MSEY COUNTY, MI NNESOTA TO REIMBURSE CE RTA IN ORIGINAL. EXPENDITURES. FOR GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES FROM THE. PROCEEDS Or.E CMP.T BONDS To BE. ISSUED BY THE CiTY OF CEM LAKE, RAMS.FrY COUNTY, M1JJJ OTA AFTER THE PAYMENT OF SUCH ORIGINAL EXPENDITURES. tVHGRCAS, Treasury Regulations, Section I.15.0- .(the "Reimbursement.Regulation"), pr6mulgated pursuant to Section 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1:986 a -amended (the.".Cpoe"), provides that the allocation of proceeds of tax-exempt. bonds to.expenditures for.governmentai purposes Originally paid from. a.source other than such t7z-cxernpt l�otids will be treated. as expenditures of such tax-exempt bonds only if certain.requir•ements of the Reiiiibursement >;eg*ulatiitn are satisfied by the :issuer of such tax-exempt bonds;..and WILREAS-the City ofGern Lake; Ramsey County. Minnesota, a statutory city and a. political subdivision :ofthz State Of Minnesota (tile "City'), expects to incur certain original expenditures for governmental purposes. to be financed temporarily from. sources other than proceeds of tax-exempt bonds and which are expected to be reimbursed front the proceeds .of one or more series tax-exempt bonds; now, therefore, be it -R-9SOLVED, by the. City CounFil.of the City of*Gem Lake as follows: 1; The City has a reasonable expectation (within tiie meaning of Treasury Regulatioins; Section 1.148-1(bJ) that it will make expenditures for the projects generally described in EXHIBIT A. attached to this resolution (.the "'Protects"). The City has a reasonable expectation. that it will issue one or more series of tax-exempt bands (rite • Boirds­) for each of the Proiects in the estimated maximumprincipal-ainounts set forth in EXHIBIT A and that i; will »take reimburseinent allocations with respect to:sueh origins).*expenditures born the proceeds tifsuclt Bonds. 2. The City Clerk is authorized to designate appropriate additions to EXHIBIT A. in circumstances where+ time - is ofthe essence, and any suet -designation shall be reported to:the .City Council at the earliest practicable date and Aiall be filed with the official books and records of the City as provided in Section 3. 3, 'This resolution shall be maintained aspart ofthe books and records ofthe City at the train adniinistrafivc bliice oklie Cite, and shall be continuously available during normal business hours ofthe 0ty on every business day of die period beginning not more.than .thirty (30) days after adoption of this resolution and. ending on the last date of issue of any Bonds issuedto reimburse: expenditures described in EXHIBIT A: 4. This resolution has been adopted.not later than sixty (60) days. after payment of any original expenditure to be subject to a reintbursentent allocation with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds: . All , eitiiburseinent.allocations with respect to the Bonds will be made not later than eighteen (18) months after -the later.of: (1) the date the original expenditure is paid; or (ii) the date the.. Project is. placed'in.service or abandoned, brit. in no event more than three (3) .years after the original expenditure. 6, All.briginai expenditures to which reimbursetnentallocations.are to be madeconstitnte; (1)caoitatexi errdittires; (ii) costs:ofissuance of the Bonds; (iii)expenditures forextraordinary, non -recurring i.terns tharamnat cusioniarfly payablefrom current revenues, such as casualty losses or extraordinary legal judgeirerits in: an, units iiz.cxcess of reasonable. ins..urance coverage; and fail which iio reserve is maintained; .or (iv) a. grant (as defined in Treasury i . gtrlations. Section 1.14$-6(0)(4); as a transfer for a governmental purpose of money or property to a transteree, t hat is not a related party to or an agent -of the transferor with respect to which no obfigation :or condition is imposed. to directly. or indirectly repay arty amount. to the transferor).. 7. The limitations set .forth in.par•agraplis 4 arnd 5 of tliiis resolution.do trot apply to: (f) the costs of issuance of the Bonds: (ii) an amount not in excess.of the. lesser of.$100,000 or five (5%) perceiit.of the.proceeds of the Boils or(iii) preliminary expenditures up to an amount. not in excess of twenty (20%) percent orthe aggregate issue price ofthe Bonds that finance or are reasonably expected by the City to finance the.' Projects. for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. Tile term "preliminary expenditures" includes architectural; engineering; surveying, soil testing, reinibursenient for bond issuance, and similar. costs that are incurred prior to commencement of arquisitian, construction orrehabilitation ofa Project, other than land acquisition, site preparation,and siaiilar.costs in.cide.nt to commencement of construction; Paged of 6 s. This resolution is an expression ofthe reasonable expectations..of the City.based on. tiie facts mid.circumstances kiidwriJb the City as of the date hereof: The anticipated original -expenditures for tho Projects set forth at E%hibit :A and. the principal arnount of the Bonds :set. forth in EXHIBLT A are--ptisistent with the Chy's budgetary. and financial circutnstances. No.source other than Bonds to.be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be; reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to. the Gity's budget or financial. policies to pay such Project expendittires. 9. " f'his resofution is intended to constitute a declaration of official intuit. for purposes of the Reitnbursernenl I.Zesnittt': Ip. No reimbursement allocation of the proceeds of the Bonds.tb- Projet;t ezpenditutes will etiipiloy an abusive arbitrage device {within the meaning of Treasury Regulations, Section L 148-1010 avoid the.arbitrage restrictions or to avoid the restrictions of Sections 142-7 ofthe Code. The toreboiti� Resolution was offered by.Cou. r Watson and. was supportedby Counci for Rammissen.and wasclared adoplred based upon die followine vote! NAMI~ WEQT- T ' WATSON :`RASIVIUSSEli1'' : SC:H..I:LL;I.ING.. ` BOSAK. VOTE. ifye Aye Aye Absent Ahst,nl ATTEST 1. Frederic C. Magnuson; (lie .duty qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, Cotinty-of Ramsey, State of 'Viinnesota. do hereby.certify that the foregoing Resolution is. a *trite and accurate representation of action taken .by the. City Council ofthe City of Gem Lake on the date first written. ,?-/ �91W"zaf,-w 2006' Frederic C. Magnusgn, City Clerk Date &rtifiieb OP c-f Ic rc5plu1iun120t1ti4�u?f►066 Page 5 of 6 CITY OF GEM LAKE OSOLUTION NO::2006417 .20 March 2.006 .A RESOL[1TiON ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPER NOTIFICATION OF.OW.NERS OF PROPERTY TO BE BENEF'I.CLAIALY AFFECTED 13Y CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED AS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROTECT NO.2006-01 (P1P2006-01). WHEREAS. the City Counc il and .Stittfhave.identified the need to improve citystreets including Big Fox road, Little' Fox Lane, Tessier Road and .Haven Lane; and WHEREAS, several. residents of Gem Lakelocated along these city streets have similarly requested improvements to these roads by the City, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No: 2005-26;•the Gem -Lake -City Council did order feasabiIity studies for consideration of this public improvemettt;.and WHEREAS, said feasability study has been prepared by the City's designated Project F,itgitleer; Mr. David Mitchell of SEH; inc.•and deliyered:to and reviewed by the City•Coomil; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City6f Gem Lake. does hereby order public hearings ion the matter be set before the: Gem Lake City'Coancil at 7;00 PM on,Monday, 10 April 2006, for Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane residents., at 1:00 PM on Wednesday,12 April 2006, for Haven Lane and Tessier Road residents and. furthet. orders the City Clerkto.•prepare proper public noticadfsuch hearings for.pubiicatiodinthe Ciity'.s official newspaperand for direct mai l to Q benefntted owners of real property .in the -City Qf Gem Lake. The foregoing'Resolution•wai s offered by Councilor. Watson and was supported. by Councilor Boni and was declared adopted based upon the following. vote: ..:......... :::.;::;.:, I;MEOT:';::.:: e .r..tyr Aye Aye Absent Absent Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County •ofPpimsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is.a true and accurate representation ofaetion taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date frst;writtan. FredericC. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy c.=lite: trvlutioh%2o06W2o06-07 Page 4 of 13 CITY OF GEM LADE RESOLUTION NO..2006-08 20. March 2006 A RESOLUTION ORDERING A P.U-B.LIC. HEARING AND PROPER NOTIFICATION OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY TO BE BENEFICIALLY AFFECTED: BY CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED AS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO:. 2006-03. (PIP2006-03). WHE.REAS;•RBmsey •County has indicated an interest: in turning back that portion .of the street currently known as Scheuneman Road commencing at it's intersection with. County Road.); thence north to it's intersection with State Highway 61 thus making said street a City owned street; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Staff have identified the need to improve said street including widening, repaving, installadon.of-storm water management design characteristics; and WHEREAS, it is the•c6llect1ve opinion of the White: Bear Lake Fire Department acting•as Gem Lake's fire department, the Ramsey -County Public Health. Department and the Gem Lake City. Coundifthat installation of city water to this business district is critical for the coiWnuing operation of existing businesses as- vvell.as development of additional business in the..area; and: WHEREAS, severalresidents of Gem Lake locatedalong this street have similarly requested similar improvements to the.area described by the City; and WHEREAS, by ResolutioQ No, 200.5-26, the Gem Lake City Council did order feasability-studies for consideration of this public improvement; and - WHEREAS, the City -Council did similarly. order in accordance with Vs -Comprehensive Municipal Plan a proposed plan for installation -of city water in the,City of Gem Lake with installation of water in this. district as -it's first phase of implementation; and WHEREAS,.said teasability study has been prepared by-dw City 9,-designated Pro" ect.Engineer, Mr. *David Mitchell of SEH, Inc. and delivered to and reviewed by the City Council; now, therefore; be it RESOLVED, that thc City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order a public hearing on the matter be set before the Gem Lake City Counoll*at 7:00 PM on Monday, 24.Apri1.2006, and further orders the. City Clerk to prepare proper public noticeof sttch a hearitigiFor publication in the City's official newspaper and for.direct mail to all benefitted owners of real property-iri the. City.%of Gem Lake. The foregoing Resolution was offeredby Councilor Bosek and was supported by Councilor Walson and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: ..:........:.......... ......................... E - Aye Aye Absent Absent stye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the Cityof Gem Lake, County. of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do herebycertify that: the foregoing Resolution is.a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the daft first written. Frederic. C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy Emile: resolution120Wn62006mN Page 5 of 13 CITY OF GEM. -LAKE RESOLUTION NO.200"9 20 March 2006 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 43F, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, LAST AMENDED 15 DECEMBER 2003 WITH SAID AMENDMENTS TO INCLUDE: I} DELETION OF SECTION. 18 IN IT'S ENTIRETY; .AND 2) ADDITION .OF NEW SECTION .18 AS DEVELOPED BY THE GEM LAKE PLANNING COMMISSIONAND ZONING ADMINISTRATORS, REVIEWEDATMULTIPLE PUB.LI.CHEARINGS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION DURING 2004 AND 2005,.AND RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION IN AUGUST, 2005 BY THE GEM LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, dieCiry CounciLofthe City of Gem Lake did, in 2004, charge the Gene Lake. Planning �Commission with the responsibilityofrecornmending amendments to Ordinance No. 43F, the Zoning*Ordinatice, that. -would -cause said local control .to berepresentative of the..commitmen%made in the Gem Lake Comprehensive ]Municipal Plan; :and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission .brought forth- recommendations. to the City Council in. August. 2005 which, while deemed incomplete in other jroposed amendment areas and in need offurther study,-1nchkded complete.text for amendrnenfofSection 18 iri it's entirety; and WHEREAS, the Chairman of the Gem Lake Planning Commission concurs to;-ofthisday that the recommendations for amendments. proposed for Section 18, Ordinance No.. 43F have been made in accordance with the recommendations.of the Planning Commission; now, -therefore, be. it RESOLVED, that.the. City Council of the City of Gem Lake hereby accepts the proposed recommendation for amendment of Gem Lake Ordinance No. 43F, Section 18 by deleting the entire section as shown in Ordinance No. 43F, adding the.new language .as attached hereto as Section 1.8, :i4en*ing therevised ordinance as: Ordinance 430, and ordering enactment of said revised .Ordinance No. 43GG.uptmpublicatiQn in the City's official newspaper; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby ordered to publish notice ofthis adoption in summary faym.and that Ordinance No: 436shall be. placed -in full force and effect on the date: of such. publication. The foregoing.Resolution.was offered by Councilor Emeott and was.supported by Couricilot Bosak and was declared adopted based u on the folloin .vote: EMEOTI' WATSON RASMUSSEN ;;CHILL=TNG Aye Aye Absent Absent Ave ATTLST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson,. the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey; State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is. a true. :and accurate. representation of action taken by the Ci Council of the Ci . of Gem Lake on the date first written. 6T/�;eo A ,?Ooe r.reoerrc C:..M.agnuson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy c-file; reso1utionl2W6%no2006-04 Page.5. of I3 CITY .OF GEM LAt(E RESOLUTION NO.2006-11 17 .APRIL 20.06 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF GEM I,AKE PLAN REVIEW COMMISSION AS AN ADVISORY BOARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND TO -.CITY STAFF AND DEFINING iT'S FUNCTiON. WHEREAS:it is tlt.e polity of the City of Gent .Lake:te preserve and promote an .attractive and stable "small town"residential..and'cottimdre al environment for.it's citizgns'in accordance with the. Comprehensive Municipal Plan ;is adopted and, from time to tinle,.atnended;. and WH F`REAS,. it is the. policy of the City of Get» . Lake to -encourage and to use best management practices to insure high quality residential and commercial development with compatible land uses Within 1heCity: and WHEREAS, the City of Gear Lake is required by the Lein Lake.ordina►ices including, but not. limited to the Zoning 01-dinance its adopted arid, from finte-to*time amended, to pertbrm a review ofall site plans to insure that all building plans conrbrni with Ordinances enacted and,. ftom time:tb time amended, by the City and development agreements enured inlo by .the City: now, thcrefbre he it W SOLV EO, that.in accordance with MN Statutes CFtapter 412.111*,.tht: City Council :of tht: City of*Gem I..ake does ltcroby establish anadvisbry board to be known as.tfle "Gent .Duke Aliin Revietv.Cd)ranlrssfotr" with said:comblittec to c:Onsist pr notMore than three Q) members to be appointed by the ?Aayor and.confinned by a. simple majority vote of ill City Council, providing, however,.that.one of said members shall lie'a duly appointed zoning administrator for the. City of 6rent lake; and, .be it FURTHEK RESOLVED, that the. membership of the Commission shall be annually renewed and, as.necessary new appointments made, by resolution at the first meeting. of the City Council in each calendar year. and, be it FURTFI.Is`R..RI:SOI,VED, that it shall be the function of said commission to: l) establish criteria for examination of construction plans:hy the Commission based upon local ordinances, the Co.rnprehensive Municipal Plan and. development agreements entered into bythe City; and, 2). io review all residential and commercial coitsVuction plaits requiring building permits to be issued by the City. of Gem Lake to insure compliance with the criteria:.and, 3:) to refer all such plans to the Certified Building Official appo.inted.by the City of Gem Lake whoshall further inspect said plans to insure comp lance with all codes adopted by the City of Genii Lake,•. and, d) to refer all commercial. plans,to the City Engineer and other:such competent authority as may be necessary for further technical review; and, 5) to make recommendations. to admi ni strat ive. sta tf charged with the issuance of building.and i uilding relatod perttiits regai-ding.tlte pfan`s.contptiance with tali criteria required by the Commission, the. Senior Building.Qfiicial,.and the City Engineer: and, be it F'tJR'rm E.R.RESOLVFD. hi the event the Commission recommends den ial.ofabuilding permit and: is unable through Ire otiari.on with the:;tpplic:arit to resolve the conflict causing said.reconimendation for denial then tite matter shall be rcl:i:rred to the: City Council who shall act as the Board o.f.Appeals.in all such matters. The lbregoiir_ Resolution was offered --by Councilor Emeou.and was supported by Councilor War,san.and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME CMEO T ':` :.WATSON.. RASMQSSEN SGI1:1iL1yfNG..' BOSAK: . VOTE Aye /11�e Qt"e Aye Aye ATTEST 1. Frederic.C. -Magnuson, the duly quali.iied City Clerfw-of the.City of-Gern Lake. County of Rarnsey. State of lklinnesola, do.hereby certify that the. foregoing Resolutiot is a tNe�.and accurate representation ofaction taken by die City Council oft lie City of Gem Lake on the date first .written. Fredt;eieC:.-Magnuspn, City Clerk. Date Cerfif ieb Co k. l'a-e 3 of 5 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO..2006-1.2 1'7 April2Q06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, MINN.ESOTA ODERING CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. -WHEREAS, the City council of the CitvofGem.-LAe. Minnesota (the "city`').did in April, 2005 coinniissionSEH. INC.; acting its cii- Eila.itieer to conduct a Feasability Report (the "Feasalsility Report") indicating. the. current'.coiidition Arid repair heeds of Big Fox Roan, Little Fox Lane, Tessier Road and. Haven Lane: and W I I EIZEAS,.the. City slid. in October. 2005; expand the scope of the Feasability Repots to include consideration ofextension .of c its municipal satiitary sewer and city water to the affected areas with the belief that said consid6tations .were best considered r,l)cu s;(Nets V. ere under construction and. were also considered timely in accordance with the City. -of Gertz Lake Comprehensive ;\luttitiiial Plan: and WIM11EAS, the.Cit.y did review the Feasability.Repoit:as ptesented'in March, 2006 and did order public hearings:on :the I'lU ter to be duly noticed, published Lind convened on 10 April 2006 for Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane and on `12 :April .2006 for 'ressier.Road aid Haven Lane; and WHEREAS. ten (I0) days mailed tiotices and._two. (2) weeks .published notices of the Hearings were given to affected homeowners: and, 1i'N FREAS; the City did convene said public hearings on the dates prescribed, did present the .Feasability_Reports, did present a lc,lso t:thlc estimate of the impact ofthe.assessment for the Improvement; and did prepare:records of the proceedings which are itit:1,niied as -minutes ol'Public Hearing.blo. 200C-Ol and Minutes of'Piiblic flearingNo.2006-01 andwhieh indicate acceptance of the Project E.'ngincers Findings: and WHEREAS, the (rexonsrruction oftho. City streets identified as. Big Fox Road, Little Fox Lane, Tessier Road and -Haven Lane is ltercinal er referred to as the "Improvements" and shall also be identified as.Public Improvement Project No..2006-01; and WH.ERFAS, al I affected homeowners and persons who desired -to be heardwithrespect to the proposed improvements were given. an opp.prtunity to lbe.heard: Now.'rurREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE.CITY COUNCiLOF.THE CITY'OF GEM LAKE ASTOL:LOWS: 1. cost-effective and feasible as described.in the Feasibility Report prepared by SDI. 2. The total estimated. cost of the Improvements based upon the Project Engineers. estimates for Patch and Overlay «,ith rolled. shoulder instead of curbing 1s as fo.11ow5: A. Big Fos Roan and Little Fox Lane at S.100,00b; and li. I laN,eti Lane at S21,000 plus;removal of'2 problematic'trees on:at approximately $1,000 each or $2.000 total: and ;. 1'ki order plttchittgand iiot: oil/rock treatment as necessary and without cost estimate for Tessier Road as part of the project. 4. The: Improv.enlents are hereby ordered. 5. "SEH is hereby designated.as the engineer for the Improvements..SEH shall prepare plans and specifications for make ofthe Improvements. Kennedy & Graven, . Chartered is hereby. designated as special counsel to the City with. respect to the (mhrat e.ments turd Ehler's .Associates is hereby designated as financial consultant to the City with respect to the Improvements.. 'I'lie foregciing Resolution was offered by.Councilor Watcuii and %v& supported by Counoilar,ScJrillrti and was declared arty ter! based a mon the.following vote: NAMEVyA'i$ON: -B.OSAK- SCi11LLING RASMUSSEN VOTE rltte Aye Aye Aye tte -Cite Page 4 of ATTEST I. Frederic C. Magnuso», thb.dttly gtiafified tit y Gterk of the City of Gent Lake, County of-Ratnsey, Stato oMiniiesnta, dU he on is a true -and itccurate representation of action takemby-the City Counci rl y cLi tify tliat the t'oregoing Resolutil of the City: of c:it'ltl 1 ai:e.on the date first written. i.� re.cic.ric C. M agnuson, City Clerk &rtif zeb CI'CoB Date C-illu resolution'+?(}O6.WOO(lo-I, Paae'S of'S CITY OF GEM LXKE.. RESOLUTION NO.20b6-15 19 JUNE 2006 A RESOLUTION APPROVING USE OF THE AUTOMAR14 BALLOT MARKING DEVICE 1N THE 2006 STATE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS. TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF GEM LAKE: WHEREAS, Congress enacted the..Help:America Vote Act (HAVA)ia 2002 to ensure thatthe voting method utilized in Avery polling place includes a ballot marking device -that is accessible for .individuals -with: disabilities and provides them the: ability to. vote privately independently; and WHEREAS, the Ramsey County. Board of Commissioners.has adopted the --local equipment plan developed by the cities -and school.districts in-4he County to acquire and operate a ballot matking.device that is accessible:to.persons with disabilities; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County has received a:.state grant in.the. amount.of $1,256;572 to acquire and operate such a balltif marking*ice for disabled voters; and WHEREAS, the.Mionesota secretary of state has certified the Automark"ballot marking device for use. in this state; and WHEREAS, the.Ramsey County auditoir has-$uthorized. the use of the. Automark ballot marking device in all elections in Ramsey County; Now, Therefore, Be It AE$91.VED, that the City Catuncil ofthe-City ofGem-Ldke authorizes the use of the Automark ballot marking device for all*elecdonsheld *in the City ofGefti Lake; In accordance with applicable state and federal laws; and -be it further RESOLVED, that the. operation. and maintenance -of the Automark ballot marking device be conducted in the:sarn& mariner pmlvided, for voting systems in the joint powers agreement between.the City of Gem Lake and the County adopted by -the Ramsey County Board of ConmrriW9nersbn,April24, 2001;-and bss itAirther RMLVED, that. the Chy. Clerk. ofthe City otGem.Lakeprovide information oil the use of the Automark ballot marking device to the public during the -sixty (60) days prior to the 2006.state primary -and public demonstrations of said device during; the six (6) weeks:prior*to the 2006 state primary, in accordance with statelaw; and be it further RESOLVED that a copy ofthis resolution be provided to. the. Ramsey County auditor. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Bosak at d was supported by Councilor ft;nIMsen and was declared adopted based upon the followine vote: NAME - EMEOTF ' ""'WATSON , 1tZASMU�SEN; -SCHILLING SQSAK .. " Aye. ,Aye Aye. Aye Aye ATTEST 1, riederic C:'Magnuson, the duly qualified City. Clerk ofthe City of Gem Lake, County of)tarnseyy, State. of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the. foregoing Resolution is a true-ancl'aeeurate.representatioxt ofaciion taken by the City Council of the Ci of Gem .Lake on:the date first written. -/O�Lqw ,coos Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy e-file: resolutionl20Wna2006� 15 Page 6-of 17 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-18 19 JUNE 2006 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 9.5(1), ORDINANCE NO. 43G FOR MICHAEL AND ANNE:STROMM ER, 391.0 SCHEUNEMAN ROAD. WHEREAS, Michael and Anne Strommer have.made an application for a variance from nine (9') feet from the side yard set -back of fifteen (IT) feet required by Section 9.5(1), Ordinance.No..43G; and WHEREAS, the. needs for a variance have been reviewed by the Zoning.. Administrators and determined to. be valid so as to provide symmetry of construction to existing:onsite:structures; and WHEREAS; a duly noticed public hearing.on the matter was convened before the Gem..l:.ake.Planning Commission. on 05 June:2006 in accordance the procedures set forth in. Ordinance No.43G and all in attendance were.heard .and WHEREAS, the Gem Lake Planning Commission recommends approval of the Variance; .and WHEREAS, the matter of.this variance comes before the City Council ofthe City of Gem Lake at it's -regular ineeting:convened on 19 June 2006; now; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City :of Gem Lake .finds adequate .findings for the application and no significant opposition to theapplication.and:therefore approves.issuanee of Variance from:Section 9.5(1), Ordinance No. 43G with the. cod iciI that construction. commence within one ( I) years. from the date first issued. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Bosak and. was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared adopt d1failed based u .on the following vote: ATSON':;::";; :'RASMUSSEN>.:::;'SCHILLING'."'.''..;::>::..;iB VOTE':.::`.:;: Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C..Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the.: City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do. hereby certify that the Foregoing Resolution. is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the C!ty Council of the Ci of Gem Lake on the date first written. �aa�a �o. �car�usaa� �9 ,�406 r reaeric L. magnuson, [.:fty CUM Date Certified Copy c-file; resohj6onUQ061n02006-18 Page 7 of 17 CJTY OF GE.M. LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-1-9. .19 JUNE 2006 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR. BffiiCE.AND LORRY SHIRLEY,.1400 GOOSE LAKE ROAD TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF;A.SINCLE )FAMILY HOME WITH A REAR ELEVATION IN EXCESS OP THE HEIGHTS ALLOWED -IN SECTION 7.4, ORDINANCE NO..43G AND SECTION 5.4, (PROPOSED) ORDINANCE NO. QH. WHEREAS, i3lnice.anii Lorry Shi>rleyhave made an application forConditional Use Permit to provide`for'an exterior elevation.of-64-four (44) feet to provide for construction of:an attached garage: adequate for parkingtheir motor home in doom and WHEREAS, the needs for issuance of a Conditional Use Permit have -been reviewed by the Zoning. Administrators and. Plan Review Committee and determined to be valid and in the best interest of the.property .and WHEREAS, a.duly noticed public hearing on the.:matter was convened before the Gem Lake: Planning Commission on 05•ione 2b06 in accordance the.procMures set forth in Ordinance No. 430.•and•all in attendance were heard; and WHEREAS, the Gem .Lake Planning Commission recommends issuance of the•Cotiditignal Use Permit in accordance with Ordinance No. 43.G; and WHEREAS, the Plan Review'Committee.recommends issuance of the. Conditional Use Permit.in accordance with (Proposed) Ordinance No..43H;, and WHEREAS, die.matter ofthis Conditional Use Permit comes before the City Council of the City ofGem Lake at it's regular meeting convened on 19.June 2006; now, therefore,.. be it RESOLVED, that the City Council. of the: City of Gem. Lake: finds. adequate. imdings for the application and no significant opposition to the application and dwrcfore.approves issuance of a Conditional Use Permit providing for construction of a single family home with an exterior thcade less than -ten 11-0)greater than the thirty -.five (35'.) feet allowzd, providing construction of .the building commences.within one (1) .year from the date first of this issuance. The foregoing Resolution was offered by CouncilorSclift&g aod.was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared adoatedlfalled based upon the following vote: ...:..:....... 1VAME�. : ......... � WATSON ; RASNNSSEIV . SGHiLLING -� � t ;. • BOSAI{- > , Aye Aye Ayc Aye Aye ATTCS i' 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk Qf the City. of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, Statc .of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the Citv Council of the Citv of take on -the date first written. • : • ltf�ir'fil -49 2006' Frederic C.. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy e=rite: resolutioM2WXno2006-19 Page 8•6f 17 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.1066-20. 19 J'UNE 2006 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE N.O. 43G TO PROVIDE LOCAL CONTROLS TO IMP.LEMENTTH.E I997 COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL.PLANINACCORDANCE WITH CITY COUNOlL' RESOI:.UTIOlNNO, 1.99x-hi. WHEREAS, Minni sotaSt6tutes.§473_86S•requires9ocal governmental units to adopt"bf i.cial controls'?* to implement it's Comprehensive Municipal.Plan;.and: WHEREAS, Mihriesgta Statutes §462.357. Subd. I authorises the adoption of a zoning Ordinance or amendments tholeto independent of the foregoing authorization; and WHEREAS, aZoning Ordinance is an official control within the meaning oi:lvlinnesota Statutes §473.852, Subd. 9; and. WHEREAS;.On,05. June 2006 the Gem Lake Planning Commission held.a duly noticed.pubiic hearing: to review and tp receive all. public ddrriinent, written and verbal, regagtng'he proposed changes to the City of Getn Lake Zoning ,.Ordinance; and WHEREAS. the -City Council adopted the 1997•Compreltensive Municipal.i'lan on 21 July 1997 by means•ofResolution No, 1997-1 l;.atid WHER1 AS, Resolution No. 1497-1 I -further charged the Gem -Lake Planning Commission.to recommend amendments. to current local controls and to develop of such additional: Igcat controls as may be necessary to• i6plerhent tiie 1997 Comprehensive Municipal Plan; and 1'YHCItIiA;S; the Gem lake Planning Commission did on 45 luiie:2U06•vote.3. Aye; 0laiay,.2 Absent to present the proposed amendments to the.Gem Lake Ci y Council foradoption as Ordinance: No: 43•H; now; therefore, be it IZESOLV I:D, that the City Counicil of the ,.Cjty of Gem i;ake hereby adopts the fol lowing findings of fact: 1) the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as recommended by the Gem: Lake PIanning Commission promote the public heaith, safety, morals, and general welfare and promotes the use of land within the City.:of Gem Lake to conserve shoretands and otherwise accomplish: the purposes authorize by •Minnesota. Statutes §462.357, Subd. 1; And 3) the proposed amended Zoning (ordinance No.43•H is 0h9isteritwith the 1997 Comprehensive -Municipal Plan. and, be it FUItTHER RESOLVED, that based upon the: foregoing Findings of Pact.and.all proceedings and information in the tiles ofthe City. relatino.thcreto: I.) Zoning Ordinance No. 43H i's hereby adopted in it entirety; and Zoning.District.Map shall be updated to reflect all changes contained in Ordinance No. 431-1 and is.iia.reby adopted as the official Zoning District Map of the City of Gem Lake; and 3) The summary ofOrdinance.No. 43H attached hereto as Exhibit:"A" shall be published in the White Bear Press in lieu of the fttll text of Ordinance No. 43H. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Couni ilor3chillurgand was supported -by Gounciiot-Aasmyssen and was declared adopted based unon the following vote - NAME EiMEOT.T •.WATSON=:• •_.:.RA MU,*SSEN* SCWGUNG. 'VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Absent RF,SOLUTION NO.2006-zo 19 June 2006 ATTEST i. Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem. Lake.. County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the -City of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic 4 C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date &rtff ieb COPU 0-MC: ccsolutioa12 NaO200.6-20 EXHIBIT `A' Public Notice No. 2006-26 By means ofCity.Couneil Resolution No. 2006-20, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake adopted amendments --tor the,, Zoning Ordinance of the City of Gem Lake which shall be in the future identified as Qrdin4nee. No: 43H, said` Ordinance to tie effective the date of this publication. A ppiplete.copyof-rdiw&-No.43H which includes all amendmentsth* * 05.June 2006,maybe obtained*f inftCityClerk in electronic orpub[ished format and Dias also been placed. for viewing at the Ramsey County Library, White Bear Lake branch.. CITY OF GEM LAKE .1:iE.SOLUTION NO.2006-33 14 September 2006 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 1993-07 AND NO..200,4-0b REGARDING GEM LAKE'S PARTICIPATION IN RAMSFY' COUNTY FUNCTIONAL CONSOLIDATION OF ROADWAYS. BY ACCEPTING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS AND AMENDING THE CONDITIONS OF SUCH ACCEPTANCE. WHEREAS, The 199.1 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local Government. Services Study Commission tU "report on the advantages and. disadvantages of sharing, .cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating...." activities in areas of public service including public works.; and WHEREAS, the Gem Lake City Council did by means ofResolution. No. 1.993-07 agree to accept ownership of certain Ramsey County roadways in the City of`Gem IlAk.e.subject to certain: conditions: and WHEREAS. The Functional Consolidation Plan provides for reclassification of roadways and corresponding changes in Jurisdiction including the transfer oflocal and State Aid roadways between'tfie Countyand municipalities; and W H EREA$. Scheunernan Road (County Road. # 147). from County .Road E . (Ramsey County Road # 15) Borth i6 Trunk I Ighway 61. located in the:.City of Gem Lake, is presently under the. juhsdiction of Ramsey County as a County Road; and WHEREAS. Hoffman Road West. (County Road 41.46)*ft6m.*Trunk Highway 61 north to County Road E (Ramsey County Road it-I5), !prated in the City of Geln Lake, is presently under the jurisdiction of Rains ey County as a County Road.; and WHEREAS; These roadways have.been determined to serve a local function only; and. WHEREAS, Revocation of "County Road" status may: be accomplished by resolution of the .Ramsey County .Board .of Coininissioners pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. §163.11: and WHEREAS, It appeals. to the. City Council of the City of Gegi Lake that the..streets hereiriafter described upon turrtback from Rztmey County should be.designiated a CityStreets untder tlte.provisions or Minnesota .lAtwo and WHEREAS,.'rhe Functional Consolidation Plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve the roadway to acceptable Is vets prior to transferring jurisdiction over roadway :segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey. County Capital Improvement Program provides -funding for these improvements; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes §383A.16 requites -that Ramsey. County.shall,'before transferring jurisdiction over -,roadway se;tnews, improve each highway to a'condition consistent with a Ramsey County pavement management score of°ninety: and WHEREAS; The City of Gem Lake deskto to, reconstruct both Scheuneman and Hofftnan.Road West as described herein an(] fund the reconstruction project with Municipal sources, and up to $70,126 from Capital Imprgvement Funds for Ramsey ounty Roadway.Consolidation; and WI•IEREAS. Aie City of Gent Lake has -agreed that by accepting this jurisdictional transfer and receipt. of .up. to $70,126 cbllcctively for the reconstruction of these segments, -of Scheanetnan Road and. Roffman Road, West from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation that RamSeyCouhty.has fully discharged its obligations to the City arising under.M.innesota Statutes §§163.11 and 383A.1.6 and the Functional Consolidation Plan, and that it has no e.ipectacipn of funding of the ongoing inaintenance of this segment by Ramsey County; Now, Therefore, Be It RrSULVED. The City. of -Gem Lake does hereby concur with the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners revoking the "Ci�uinty Road".status..of Scheuneman .Road. (County- Road #147) from County•Road E (Rarnsey County Road #15) north to Trunk Highway 61 and I4offr0an.Rgad West (County.Road #146) from Trunk -Highway 61 norith to County Road E(Ramsey County Road. #! 5).. and. accepts transfer of jurisdiction over these roadways to the City of Gem Lake, effective after thtr. Ramsey County Office ofBudg0hZ and Accounting has encumbered the funds necessary io fund this reconstruction.project. up to S70.126 and 'Be It Further. Page 3 of 8 14 September 2006 RE'SMUTION NO:2006-27 RESOLVED, The -County shall transfer it's interest in the public road right-�of-way.and road easements to the City of Gem Uke lix the delineated roadways it cun-ently holds; and Be It Further RESOLVED, This transfer is.conditioned upon receiprbj Ramsey County of this resolution adapted by-the:.City of Gem t.al a concurring with the County revoking the "County Road" status of Scheuneman Road (County Road # 147) from County Road E (Ramsey.County Road 915) north to Trunk Highway 6.l and Hoffman Road. West (County Road #146) fir6m -Trunk Highway 61 north to County Road E .(Ramsey County Road # 15), and further providing that receiptof up to 570; I26 for the reconstruction of these-egments froin Capit;d Improvement Funds for Rariisevy County Roadway Consolidation that Ramsey County lips fully discharged Ramsey County's obligations to the City arising under Minnesota Statutes § 163.1 ! and 38.7A.I:6,and the Functional Consolidation Plan relative tothis segment of roadway, and that *the City.of Gem Lake has no expectation of funding of the, ongoing. maintenance :of these segments of roadway by Ramsey Eounty.; and Be It Further RESOLVED. that upon receipt of this resolution Ramsey County will pay to the. City as just compensation for these jurisdiction transfers; up to $70,126 upon presentation of biltin gsr 6om-thd construction coniractor(s) for :the reconstruction of the segments of Scheuneman Road and Hoffman Road, andthat upon receipt of the billings, the County shall reimburse. the City in accordance with Minnesota State Statute 471.425; and,. Be It Further RESOLVED, the Gent hake City Clerk is authorized within the limits.of this resolution to take :actions necessaryto.have the identifted ,jurisdiction changes executed, and. Be It Farther RESOLVED, the.City Of Gem Lake recognizes that no: additional consideration of other Ramsey County roads -originally included as part ofGen) Lake's Resolution No, 1993-07 remain as previously established by the City Council. The..foregoitw Resolution was offered bySchilliiig and was.supported by Watson and was declared adopted based r_----° -- -- lYr1i1'[ EME0117.. , " WATSON. .RASMUSSEL+i -SCHii UNG BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Absdhl AVe Aye. ATTEST 1, Frederk . Magnuson, the duly qualified Ci►y Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, dig hereby certify that the foregoing:ResolutiQn. is*a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the ('ity ofGem Lake on the date first written. I �XEGG!%XGC "(>7..:yG,C���'!tlldOJZ fr..ederic C-. Magnuson, City Clerk Certif ieb CopB Da to c-flle: resolation'x1_0061no2606.33 Page:4 of 8 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO. 2006-21 I9 JUNE 200E A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR. AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN- AGREEMENT BETWEEN RAMSEY COUNTY -A-ND THE CITY OF GEM LAKE FOR. DISPATCH SERVICES SUBJECT; TO THR A PPRbVAL•AS TO FORM OF THE CITY ATTORNEY This Agreement is between Ramsey *Cdtinty., a political subdivision of the..Staw tr --Min iesota ("County") and the City of Gem Lake, a municipality under the iaws-of the State of Minnesota ("City"): WHFREAS, the County is in the process of implementing; anew 800 MHz radio -communications systeir; as a subsystem to the region: wide 800 MHz system; and W14EREAS,.the County: currently operates a Public Safety Answering Point ("PSAP")/Dispatch Center, froth which dispatch services are provided for the Ramsey County Sheriff; thecities of Arden ]-Hills, Gern Lake., Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks,:Roseville,.Shore.view, and Vadnais Heiglits, and the township of White [scar (collectively, the "Contract Cities"); and WHEREAS, .the County has entered into -agreements with the City of Saint Paul -and theCity of Maplewood The consolidated dispatch operations; and WHEREAS, the County is constructing a new facility on the campus of the Ramsey County Law Enforcement Center and the. Saint Paul Police Department Headquarters to house the new: Dispatch Center far theconsolidated dispatch operrtitms. using the Connty'.s new Public Safety Communication System ("PSCS")/800 MHz: radio communications syStem;.und WHEREAS, the City, which.is one.ofthe Contract Cities, wishes to obtain dispatch services. fromAhe County from the now Dispatch Center using the new 80.0 MHz. radio communication system;. and WHEREAS, the parties have reached agreement on the. terms and.conditions for the provision of dispatch services for the City by the County; NO.W, THEREFORE, in cons ideratiomofthe,mutual promises and agreements contained herein, the parties do hereby Agree as Colle. vs; Article.]. Purpose The purpose of this agreement is to establish the parameters for the provision of dispatch se.rvice.s..by the County for tite City from the .Consolidated Dispatch Center, and to delineate. the terms. and conditions under which the .County will provide dispatch services. Article. II. Dellnitions 2.01 Additional Member means Tiny public entityor agencyorgovernmental:unit that signs an agreement with:the County alter the.Dispatch.Center becoming operational; for dispatoh services by the. County from the Dispatch. .Center. Call for Service means a Computer Aided Dispatch.("CAD"j incident number that originates from. a 91 t call. 2..03 County Manager means die Ramsey County Manager appointed by the Ramey County Board of Commissioners, or the. Ramsey CpuntyManager's .designee. .Z.A4 Dispatch Center means the location -from which the .Countywill provide.emergency 91 l communications and dispatching services using its.PSCS/800 MHz radio. communications subs)jtemj for police,. fire, emergency medical services, and other -public safety€unctions for.cities and agencies that have contracted with the: County for such services. 2.05 initial Member means any municipality thaE:sigtts ati agreement with the .County, prior to the-bispatch Center becoming operational, for dispatch:servios by ow..Coonty from the ©ispatch Center. 2.06 Initial Service Term.means the time period from January 1, 2007,. through December 1,2036. 2.07 Member means either an Initial Member or an Additional Member. 2,08 Radio System Manager means the Ramsey County employee who manages the County's $06 MHz interoperabie radio communication -system and the County's Dispatch Center, �,09 Year means a calendar year. Article. III. Terns This agreement shall. become effective on Elie .date executed by, both parties ("Effective Date") and shall continue in elfect,through December 31, 2016 ("Initial Tern!"). Thereafter; the termshall autbriiatically.mtiew foraOtional one (I Year periods; up.to.a maximum of 30 renewal periods, subject to.the.right of either party to -terminate as set forth in tiection 7.01. Article TV. Dispatch Policy Committee .01. Creation 11ze Dispatch Policy Cominklee.("Cotnmitwe") is hereby created with the Dowers. and responsibilities asset forth herein. 0?. Membership a. If the Cities of Maplewood; Saint Paul, and White Blot .Lake sign agreements to consolidate: their 1PSAP/Dispatch Centers with the County's-PSAP/Dispatch Center, the.Committee is to be made up.'ofthe following elected of I . The Ramsey County Sheriff 2. Four members of the Saint Paul City Council 3.. The Mayor of the City of Saint Paul 4. The Mayor .or one member of the Maplewood City Council 5. The Mayor or .one member of the White Bear Lake City Council 6. Two elected representatives of the other cities in Ramsey County that do not operate independent PSAP/Dispatch Centers and that sign agreements with Ramsey County to receive dispatching services from the Dispatch Center, to be selected in a manner to be determined by the.involved cities. b. If flie City of White BearLake does not sign. an agreement to consolidate its PSAP/Dispatch Center with the.County's PSAP/Dispatch Center,. the number of Saint Paul City Council members will be reduced by one. If.the:City of Saint.Paul.does not sign an agreement to consolidate its PSAP/Dispatch Center with the County ',s PSAP/Dispatch Center, the Committee willbemade up.ofrepresentatives from the jurisdictions That have entered into a consolidation. agreement. c. lf�he individual appointed to the.Committee.leaves.ihe elected office; the public entity's elected officials will. be responsible: for appointing a replacemept representative in a timely fashion: d. Committee. members shall be appointed by the jitrisrliction they represent for such period of time as determined by..each jurisdicfon,. 4.03 Duration .a. Unless earlier dissolved by.mutual agreement of all. of the then -current Members, the Committee shall continue to :operate ror the duration of this Agreement. 4.04 Officers a: The Committee members shall select a Chair and a Vice Chair at its first meeting, and thereafter on an artnual*.basis, provided that, during the first two Years of its operation, the Mayor of the City of'Saint Paul sltali.be.tite:Chair ofthe Committee. Thereafter; the Chair shall be selected annually from the.Gontmidea members. The initial term of the Chair shall *be two Years and of the Vice Chair shall lie one Year. Thereafter each shall serve for one Year; Tho Vice-Chaie shall be a representative of a Member other than a Member represented by the. Chair. Ifthe-GityofSaint Paul does not sign an agreement to consolidate its PSAP/D.spatch Center with the County's PSAP/Dispatch.Center; the Committee roil l select a Chair and Vice. Chair from Committee members froin jurisdictionsthathave entered into a consolidation agreement.. b. The duties of the Chair shall. be as. follows; l . approve the agenda for. Committee meetings, with the input and .assistance of the Radio System Manager and other Committee members;. 2. jmeside at Committee meetings; 3: sign all official documents as authorized.by.the Committee; 4: make reports,directly or through a designee, to the Committee.and the Ramsey County Board .as deemed appropriate; and 5. perform such other duties .as.are- incident to the office and properly expected by the Committee; c. Tbe-duties of the Vice Chair shall be as follows: 1, in the absence of the Chair, to perform the duties of the. Chair; and 2. to perform such duties as may be requested by the Chair. d. The Radio System Manager shall serve as executive secretary to file Committee and shall provide for'all correspondence, reporting, and recordkeeping functions for the CoMabittee, consistent with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 and. statutory retention laws. 4.05 Powers and Authorities of the _Committee. a. The Committee shall assistthe County iilreviewingand evaluating the perfonnance ofthe Dispatch Center to ensure that the service meets the.needs and expectations of the communities and public safety user agencies. b. The Committee shall make recommendations tb the County Manager and to the Radio System Manager concerning voice and data communications systems relating to.public safety agency dispatching; public service in education and:advertising. programs, and any other matter relating to the provision of emergency communications services. c. The Committee shall .periodically review operations and make recommendations on the operations, standards, and budget for the.Dispatch Center.. d.. The Radio System Manager shall:report to and serve at the pleasure of the County Manager as advised by the. Committee relating. to the functions involving consolidated dispatch services for the Members.. The 'County Manager will work with :the Radio System .Manager in an expeditious manner to resolve -any concerns raised by the Committee. If;. however, a majority of the Committee is not satisfied with the outcorne. the County Manager will take appropriate personnel-aeOon, which may involve termination. e. The Committee shall perform such other duties as may be requested by the Ramsey County. Board of Commissioners. 4.0.6 Meetings and, Voogg A. Tile Committeoshall meet at during the first Year this Agreement is in effect.. Tktereatier, .tlle Committee members.silali determinethe frequencyof.regulartneetings. In addition, a special meeting may be:called by the Chair or -by a majorityof the then -current Committee. members. b. Each public entity wits} a member'on the Committee shall be responsible for complying with.requircnleuts 'of State Statute relating to.open meetings. c, Cominitt" members may not appoint proxies. d. *Each Committee member shall have one vth'te. e, A decision. of the Committee shall require approval by a. majority of the Committee members: provided #hereis. a quorum in attendance. f'. A quorum.gf the Committee shall require onehalf ofth.e Committee members plus one to be in attendance at the time of any decision. g. At its first meeting, the:Comtnittee shall. adopt.a process for resolving lie votes. Article V. Oispatch Center Operations'an-d Services S.it I ICI lssiorl The Mission of the Dispatch Center is to provide both field responders and citizens the best .emergency communication service making maximum .use of personnel and technology.. 5,Q2 nay-to=Day Operations a. Day to day operations of the Dispatch. Center will be under the direction of the. Radio System Manager. 5.03 Services. a. i~rnergency communications and dispatch services shall be provided on behalfisf#heCity, lheCounty, and' other Members 24/7/365 for police, tire, and ernergeney medical services. b. The Dispatch Center will .utilize a :two -stage. dispatching system whereby telecomrnunicators will bike incoming requests forservice and relay them to dedicated dispatchers who will be assigned for police calls zs. wellas those for fire and emergency medical calls.. This. will. not impact the Co.unty's ability to cross train dispatchers for fire and police. dispatch.. -e,, 6tan4ardized procedures will be formulated with inputfi•om usergroups. Customization of procedures for participating agencies will be provided to the extent.such customization can be accommodated by the Commtitee Aided..Dispatch System. I . For the third Year,of the Initial Service 'Perri, an average of the following will:be used to determine the Clty's-Agre: i. The City's initial shatv*of Dispatch Operating. Costs .in.the first -Year as identified in section 6:02:a and. if. The City's initial share of Dispatch Operating Costs an the -second Year as identified in. section 6.02.a; and iii. The City's percentage share of Calls for Service in the first Year. 2. For the fourth Year of the Initial: Service Terri, an average of the following will be used to determine the City's share. i. The -City's initial share: of Dispatch Operating Costsin the second Year as identified in section 6.02:a; and ii. The City's percentage share of Calls fof'*Service :in the first Year. and .iii. The City's. percentage share of Calls for:Service in the.seeond Year. 3, For the' fifth Year and for each Year thereafter; the City's share will be the average of the City's Calls. for Services over the most recent three Years for which Total Calls for Service data is available: 4. The County will gibe the City notice no later titan the first day of June each Year of the amount due and payable.to Ramsey County as the City's annual share of the Dispatch Operating Costs for the following Year, 5,. The City shall make paymenttothe County monthly in an amountequal to 1/12 ofthe amountdue and payable to Rainsey-Cottrity for the Year, on the tenth day of each month of the Year, except for the payment for the first month of the Year, which shall bedue by the end of the inonth.. 6,03 911 Fees Corritneticing with the first fi l I month of the initial Service Term. the County shall credit forty (4Q) percent of any 911 fees received by the .County to the payments dudto the County by the Members for forty (40) percent of the Dispatch'Operating Costs for the Year the 9 f I fees are received, and shall credit sixty (60.) percent .of any 91.1 fees received by the .County toreduce the Couttty's property tax levy for the sixty'(60) percent of the Dispatch Operating. Costs to be paid through a county -wide property tax levy, 6.04. Other Funds Nothing Herein shall preclude.either party from applying for and receiving federai or state; or funds from other :public and private sources, for the capital, equipment and/or gperating costs of the. Dispatch Center. Article VII. General Terris and Conditions 7.01 Termination a; Except 'As otherwise provided herein; this Agreement may not. be terminated during the initial Term. Thereafter; either party may terminate. this Agreement. at the end. of.a; calendar year by action. of its governing- body and upon a minimum of twelve (12) months written notice to the other party, 7.02 Indemnification and1risurance: a.. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the acts of its employees, e.iected of .facials; and agents.as they relate to this Agreement and for. any liability resulting therefrom; to the extent.autlioriied by law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other patty or its. employees; elected oticialS, and agents, or for any liability resultingtherefrom. Each party's liability shall be governed and limited bythe Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Chapter 466-and*other applicable law. b. Consistent with.tbe provisions of Section 7,02:a., each party agrees to defend, indemnify addhold harmless flit other party, its employees, elected oflic.als; and. agents from any liability, claims, .causes of action;. judgments. damages, losses, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees,. resulting directly or indirectly front any act ofomission of the indemnifying party, its -.employees, electodofficials, or.agents, in the performance or f'itilure to perform its obligations under this Agreeniont.. c, Each party warrants that it is able to comply with the. aforementioned -indemnity requirttiaents through commercial insurance or a self -funding program. d. The County agrees -to maintain property insurance-coveKage throughoutthgterm,bFthi's Agt .errient.on the Dispatch Center facility and all of the. -County equipment within the:Dispatah<Cenrer.. 7.03 Non -Assignability Neither party shall assign any interest in this Agreement nor transfer any interest in the same,.whetbcr by Subcontract, assignment or novation. T.04 Compliance WO Applicable Law a. Both parties agree to compjy with. all federal, state and .local .laws; resolutions, ordinances,. rules, regulations and -executive orders pertaining to. unlawful. discrimination on account of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to publiic.assistance, sexual preference, disability, or age. b. Both parties agreeto c'omplywith all federal, state and local.laws or ordinances, and all applicable rules, regulations, zind standards established by any agency of such governmental units, which are now or .hereafter pm'niufgated-insofar as they relate to the parties' performance of the provisions*bfthis Agi.-eement.. 7.05 Data Practices All data collected, created, received, titaintained: or disseminated for any pnrpDte in the course of either parry's performance of this Agreement is.governed by the Minnesota Government Data Pmctices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. t3, or any other applicable stale:statutes; any state rules adopted to implement the Act and statutes; as well as federal statutes and regulations on data privacy. 7.06 Attdit Until the .expiration of six {6) Years after the termination. of this Agreement, each party shall,. upon written request of the other party, shall make available to the requesting party., the State Auditor or the requesting parry's ultimate funding sources, a copy of this Agreement and the books, documents, records and accounting procedures.and practices.relating.to this Agreement.. 7{l7 Alteration Any alteration, variation; modification, or waiver.ofiheptovisions of this Agreement shall be..valid only after it has .been reduced to writing and duly sighed by both parties. 7.08 Notice Any notice required to, be given. by this. Agreement shall be made..by delivery by First. class .mail, .postage :applied, to: Ramsey: County Office of the County Manager 250 City Hall/Courthouse 15 West Kellogg B:ouleyard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 City. oe6ern Lake, Office of ilte.-`City. Clerk 1369 Fast County Road'`E" Gem Lake, MN 55.110-5231 7.09 Arbitrai6on Any dispute between -the parties to this.Agrcement.may. be. sub j ect.to arbitration, if mutually.agreed to in writing by the parties: The parties shall mutually agree.on an arbitrator and theatbitration Will .take place under the rules and.procedures of the American Arbitration Association. The parties shall pay their own internal costs andshall each pay 50%R of any out.of pocket fees or costs related to. the arbitration. 7.10 Inte.rpretation.of Agreement.; Venue This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to:th4 laws of the State of. Minnesota.. All litigation regarding-this.Agreentent shall be venued in the appropriate state or federal district Courtin Ramsey County, Minnesota. 7.11 Conditions Outside Control of a Patty No party to this Agreement cat' be. held responsible for conditions outside the control of the party clairiling its occurrence, which are the direct. result. of force rnajeurewhich shall mean.and .include acts of public enemies: strikes or lockouts; :enforceable governmental or judicial orders; outbreak of war or insurrection, or acts of terrorism; insurrections; riots;: ci.vii disturbances; earthquakes, floods, fires;. and explosions or other similar catastrophes or events not reasonably within the party's control 7.12 Entire Agreement This Agreement shalt constitute the entire agreement between the parties and shall .supersede all pribrbial-of written negotiations. WFil REFORE; this Agreement is duly. executed on the last date written below. RAMS .Y COEJNTY Tony Bet .tl, chair Board:of unly commissiolter. 1 Bonnie Jackelen.. . e erk Board of CountAi1mmissioners Date: Approved as to form: l s is.tant. County Attorney A Pay ecammnen David Twa, County Manager i.'-ttltcl�rble� E3udgeting and Accounting CITY OF GEM LAKE Paul R. Emeott, Mayor Fredert :C. M ry son,.City Clerk Date: _. I° 16 .z k � roved as t.9 forth: Patrick et City Attorney Funds are a.+ �le; Frede.rt ,M n, City Clerk The foregoing Resolution was. offered by Councilor Nralsoif anti was supported by Councilor Rgcmusserr and was declared mlonled based unon the.followine vote: NAME EMEOTT WAT.SQN . iE�4SM—USSEi i 1�iG 'Ste�y. BbSAK VOTE �ly�� Ayt Aye Aye ATTEST .I; Frederic C. Magnuson; the-dtily-qualified City Clerk of the City ofGeln Lakd,..Cou»ty of Ramsey, State of Minnesota; do hereby certify that the -foregoing Resolution is a true Anil aecuraW representation of action taken by lie City Council of the City of Gem lake on the date f r writted. 2006' Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date &rtlf ieb Copp c-file: resoluli�ml2tNfG1m>2UUG-2I CITY OF -CFM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.20.06-23C 21 DECEMBER 2006 A RESOLUTION AMEN.DINC RESOLUTION NO. *23B AND PROVIDING FOR Atq ADD"ITiON'AL.TLMiE EXTENSION OFEXEMPTIONFROM CHANGESTOCERTAiNLOCAL CONTROLS BEYOND TH-E TWO YEARS PROVIDED FOR BY STATE. STATUTES. bV1l11'R :AS, the City Council of•the.Clty of Gem. Lake has.considered..ritany changes and suggestions for changes to the Zoning (}rciinat>ce of'he (:it}r:dtiririg the Last twO'_yeai:s; attci mli ng 01- S, the City Council of the City o!'Gei�i Lake has approved and ordered forp6blication arid. ell ac.ttncnt aiariy cliattges tU:tlie �tsnfti„ C.}I'LftllilrlC.C; aftci ti'V•HEREAS. Mr.:l.irn �iclVultyas developer oftli.e: Gem Lake subdivision he Jkaa►yn. as Hillary 1=arms lies indicated said changes mad: i�lrimt:rrtai iO the development of an .d;.tliereti>re; has requested further exemption from cllanges in Iucal ca,itrols including fire lotritig-Ordinarice. lx y-ond the iwo provided f'or• by state Siairites; and � . WFIE"'A'."'c C iiy Coulicil did, on 14 June.2006, provide a oite year extensia» beyond. the two years -provided for by state&atutes: Mid WI-101PAS..tile CitvCiiuric;4il.fee.ls and. Mr. McNulty and Mr. Rosow attorney for Mr. Mclvufty, colic.ur'that furthertitne exemption fitrrt rlitrri��cs tt� Loral eonfrol$ wi.E.l bertefit.atui facilitate developinent.Of tile.fliliary Farm subdivision.; and 4V H EREAS, the City CO'llicil of the Ciq ofGem.Lakedid by Resolution No. 2006-2:3 S extend the period .ofe�:etrr trot) from changes it? the (Jeni l.,ilk e toning Ordinance from tile. two (2) years Fran the date of final plat approval granted by tfie C.tiv�o..i. Gem fake and As lirovided by state. sttitiue to si total of five (6) years; and %V1'1E R AS.•Mr: McNulty feels and the City COLInril coritcurs that e srtl+ fyen further time exeinptiorr from changes to focal controls willfurther benefit and. facilitate development Hillary Farm subdivision, now, therefore,•be it Rl :S,01 1'ED; Iflat the Cit-Y Council oftlie: City ol`Geiii lake does.by means of thr's Resolution No. 2.0.t)6-2^ tic rig it nt'e.�entluion.iiom clianges.iu C►erit Lake7oning Ordinar�ceNo. 43G to the date Of ofthe building permit C still hfortlre tine lot sold in file subdivision; and,. be it! F 11 RTN ER RES`OL V ED, that. tip is.cotisideration is pi ovidt:dsololy t&tlresubdivision as long, as Mr: McNti Ity is the•Managing Partner rd N illar� F;ri'm. I.J,C, the •sole : owner of the project; and,. be -it i`ttRTli[ It !tf SOLVI D. that any all zoning, considerations For hordes after'thc initial resdentiai structure is cornpfetctf will be +trhjrc t. as tft� rtrles tlieh in effect at. such.i.itne consideration is requested, ItcsoltttiOn was offered by Council6r8g,#11iig and' Was supported. by Councilor Bpsrrk and vas .declared Based tt inn the.foilawin�� vote: NAME EMEOTT. • • I WATSbTI' • • TRASIb(I7� VOTE ,4)v SCHILLING ROSAK Arse AT Ti.,sT 1. i recferic t'.. lVia fnttsnn. the duly clualif ed CityClerk o.fthetityofGeni Lake County cifRanisey;:State ofNliirrtesota, do liercb.� rtrl� that tftr '�;.re�c�in4� Resolution is a tare and accurate representation ofaction taken by riie•Cit3•Council Oftne City ti , do h l;tike sirs if!,: dirle f irst written. FrWeeie C. Magnuson, City -Clerk Date Certif ieb CLahu IZWMF/ 0 al /11 �-rre: resplutions\—)t)07Cnp240fi»23C.tvpif :CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION ,NO.2006-28 14: SEPTEMBER 2006 WHEREAS, the. City Clerk -has presented a (Propos.e.d) Budget of $44.4,80 which ind1Udes'a (Proposed) Taz Levy of S3 i t,19Tarrd..a Debt Levy of . OQ,a00 for fiscal and calendar year 2007 based upon blest estimates of costs for running the City ofGem-Lake in 2007, nitd WHEREAS, theseestimates were reviewed by the City Council on.21 August,2006 and 14 September, 2006 and amended based upon best information received from outside contractors and input from the City Council, and revised by the City Council on. 14 September, 2006, and W I E REAS. the City Council did review the (Proposed) Budget and Tiix and Debt levy for 2007, including all revisions thereto as of the date first written. NOW TH EREFORE:.BE IT RESOLVED, that the City -Council of the City. of. Gem Lake does formally adopt the.2007 Pi-elini.inary General Fund Budget of $444,857 which..includes a.Net PropeityTak Leiiy of $311,1.97 and a Net Debt Leyy.of �300;()00 for 1007 as prepared by the .City Clerk and amended by the .City Council; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City .Clerk is charged with Certifying; said Tax and Debt Levy to Ramsey Count' Property Taxation and other.government bodies for whom this infonnation is required: Tire foregoing Resolution Nvas offered'by Councilor Bosgk -and was supported by Cbuniciloc Sclrilllirg and was declared: Merl based ttpon the followine vote: NAME EMEOTT VOTE Ave. WA.'�N. :' `'SCRTL�;IIYG ..:�. %�ASMi13SEN � BOSAK Aye Aye I Absent ATTEST 1, i rede.ric C. Magnuson, tile: duly qualified City Clerk of ttte City of Getty Lake, County of Ramsey,:Stat.e of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of tite City of Gem Lake on the date first written. a%"xP,42� e �T.Ct6O?L Frederic C, Magnuson, City Clerk Certif ieb CopB Date -14 .10&mkx 206ie eiile. reso1ud0nsQU06WQ 06-28 Page 5 of 8 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2Q06-34 14 SEPTEMBER 260E A RESOLUTION DECLARiNG'THE:OFFICIAL INTENT OF GEM LADE TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS Tsj BE ISSUED BY THE CITY. WHEREAS, the lntemal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. fl.150-2 (the "Reimbursement Regulations") providing that proceeds. of tax-exetrnptbonds. used to rcintburs...e prior "penditures will not be deemed.spent ahless certain requirements are met; and WHEREAS, :the City expects.fQ ineur dertainexpenditures that may be financed temporarily from sources other than. bands, and reimbursed .from the proceeds ofit tax -.exempt bond; WHIsREAS, the City has determined td make this declaratioit.-of official. intent ("Declaration".) to reimburse certain costs front.proceeds.of bonds in accordance with -the Reimbursement Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESQI,VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF GEM LAKE AS FOLLOWS: 1. 'iTte City proposes to undertake the following projects in the city in 2006 (the "ProjecP'): legal and oiher.professional expenses -in connection with threatened, annexation of:ciry property. 2. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures. niade for certain. costs of the- Project from the proceeds or bonds. in an estimated tiiaxinium principal anioutit of $300,000, All reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the bonds, ar other expenditures eligible.for reimbursement under Section; L 150-2(dXY) of the Reimbursement Itr.eu latiotts: 3. This Declaration. has been inade not later than sixty (60) days after payment of axtypriginal expenditure to be subject to. i.reimbursement allocation with respect:to the proceeds of bonds, etxcept:for the following expenditures: (a) costs of isstance of bonds; (b) costs in di atinourit not in excess of $100,000 or*five. (5,01%) percent 4the proceeds of.n issue; or ®) "preliminary expenditures" up Wan amount: not in excess of twenty (20"/u) percent of fhe aggregate issue price of the issue or issues iliac Finance :or are reasonably expected by the. City to.finance the..project for which the preliminary expenditures:were incurred. The tenn"preliminary expenditures" includes architectural, engineering, surveying, bond issuance, and similar costs that tire, incurred prior to. commenceinent. of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a project, other than -land acquisition;. site. prgmration, and similar costs. incident to t:o0im neement of conste-ttction. a. This Declaration is an. expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based on the facts and circumstances known to. the .City. as -of the date hereof. The anticipated .original expenditures fbrthe Project and the principal arnount of the bonds described in paragraph 2 are donsistent with the City's budgetary and financial circumstances.. No sources -other than proceeds of bonds tobe issued by the City:are, or.are reasonably expected to.be, Teserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the.City's budget or financial. policies to pay such Project expenditures. i. This Declaration is intended .to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of the Reimbursement [i'e- 01tions,. Tire foregoing Resolution was offered by iviayor Cnreoll and was supported by Concilgr Bosak and was declared )leed based.tt n the-follbvAn vote: NAME 1JMEO.TT .V.1!ATSOiN. .RAS.kUS''SEN SCHILLING: SOSAK. VOTE Aye Aye Abse l.. Aye Aye Page .6 of 8 Al. ['EST L Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City CIOk of the City -of tern -Lake; Countybf=Ramsey, State: of Minnesotaj. do hereby ecrtify� (fiat the foregoing Resolution is.a true and accurate representatiog.dfactiQti-t*en by the City Council of the City..of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk. Cafiffeb Date COPB 94 JoAmAe,), 2006 cdik:: rewluiicNi�2U(Kin��2UU(r34 Page 7 of 8 CITY OF GEM LAKE 11CSOLUTION NO.2006-35 14 SEPTEMBER 2006 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF ADJACENT COMMUNITIES. TO ABANDON THE BURLi.NGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS AND TO SUPPORT EXTENSION'OF TH.E BRUCE VENTO TRAIL NORTHWARD FROM BUERKLE ROAD THROUGH WHITE BEAR LAKE. WHEREAS,. the City .Council of the .City of Gem Lakehas, for more.than a. decade, offered it's support of the.extensiop c�f•.the Bruce Vento Trail north of Ramsey County Road D through Vadnais I Bights, Gem Lake, and White Bear Township to. White Bear Lake; and, WI•IERE AS, the.City Council of the City of Gem Lake understands that. the City of White Bear Lake continues to work with the, Burlington Northern, the iktinriesota.Commerciai.Railroad, Ramsey Cotu>.ty; State and other officials in pursuit of creating this extension of the. Bruce Vento Trail; and; WHEREAS, the City Council -of the Cityof Gem Lake believes that. equal or improved facilities for offloading bulk plastics as an alternative to the: Buerkle Road site exist in White Bear Township and the City of Gem. Lake; and* WHEREAS;.the City Council of the City. of Gem Lake has observed a need for.safe passage for biking and hiking thiouL-h and to or from the City of Gem Lake, attd WHEREAS, the. -City Council ofthe City of Gem Lake has begun review:of-potential additional possible westward connections front. a noithern extension of the Bruce Vento Trail that. could tie into traits in communities to the west.of Gem 1,ake; now,.th.emfore, be it RESdLV10; tile. City Council of the. City of Gem Lake extends. it's support tor- te.staffand elected officials or the City of White bear Lake in pursuit of the. extension of the Bruce Vento Trail north of it's current terminus at Buerkle Road tltrou-h White Bear Lake, and, be it .FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Count:il of the City of Gem Lake encourages Ramsey County and the State of M i+irlesota to provide their full stipport.of the extension of the Bruce Vento Trail north. -of it 's'curtdnt terminus at Btmi'kle Road through White Bear Lake.. 'Tlie foregoing. Resolution was offered. by Mayor.Emeotland was supported*byCouncilor. Bose* and was declared led based u on the fo[lowin -vote-. NAIVNE IMEOTT ' WATSON :'..:RASM�I S N SCML• JNG BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Absew I Aye. Ave ATTEST I. Frzderic C. Magnuson, the duly: qualified City Clerk of°the City of Gem Lake,. Countyof Ramsey,. State of Minnesota, do hereby certi fy that :the .foregoing Resolution .is.a true and accurate representation of action taken by the.City Council of the. City of Gem Lake on the date first written i F1-ederic. C. Magnuson, City:Clerk &rif deb Date Em �/" oloo, MAw, 200e c-frlc: reSduU(uii2006,nQ006-3> Page 8 of 8 CITY OF GEM LAI E RESOLUTION NO.2006-36 02 OCTOBER 2006 A. RESOLUTION EMPOWERING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A. .JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP ON BEHALF OF THE CITY PROV11y1NG FOR .DEVELOPMENT OF A JOINT COMMUNITY MEETING HALL. WHEREAS,. the City Counc:il of the. City of Gem Lake did by means of Resolution No. 2005-25 establish a comiitittee to meet with a committee from White Bear Township to discuss the benefits and feasabilily of jbint &velopment of a multi jurisdictional community meeting hall, and, WHEREAS, the committee established by the City Council. of. the City of Gem Lake has fulfilled the original challenge presented by the City Council and recommends the City proceed with the joint. development of a cominunity multi -use building thatwill serve.and benefit the residents of both White Bear Township and the City ofGetn.l.ake;.and; WHEREAS, the City Attorney has expressed his opinion that the joint development.and operatiori.o€a catnnitinity multi -use building by the two entities"cim be achieved; and WHEREAS, the financial consultants and bond attorney for the City. of Gem Lake have indicated that.. several methods. of financing such an endeavor including, but not limited. to, capital improvement bonds, may be used for said developinent; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED; the City Council of the Cityiof Gem Lake hereby empowers the Mayor and the. -Community Hall Development Committee to develop on behalfof.'the City of Gent Lake a Joint Powers Agreement with White Bear Township which provides for thedevelopment, ownership and ongoing operation of a community multi -use building to be located oil property -currently owned by White Bear Township.an4 located immediately adjacent the City ofGeitt t;ake to be executed by the Mayor and City -Clerk; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem..14ke further empowers the Mayor and Community Hal I Development Cominitteeto initiate Requests For Proposals fordesign-and development.ofa community multi -use building; and, be it FURTHER: RESOLVED, thatthe Coniniunity Hall DeVeiopmerit Committee and the Gem Lake City Council -will work, in concert with White. Bear Township to coordinate development of the community multi -use building to t;oincide with tlieir needs during the relocation, renovation and redevelopinent of the current White Bear Town Hall. The foregoing Resolution was .offered by Councilor Schilling and was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared atlopted based.unort the following vote. NAME . EM'EOTT W-ATWN RASMUSSEN SCHILL7NC -40SAK VOTE- Aye Aye Aye Aye I Ay'e ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified :City Clerk of the City of Gem i;.4e, .County of Ramsey,. State, of Minnesota, do hereby certify. that the foregoing Resolution..is a true and accurate representafjon of action take0y.. the. City Council of the City of Gees Lake on the date first written. i Frederic C..Magnuson, City Clerk m;et �--I f eb �j a Date c•filc resoluElon120ot,+rxk?o(N,-�G Page of 2 CITY OF OEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-37 16 October 2006 A RESOLUTION. DECLARINCCOST TO BE ASSESSED AND.ORDERING A PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON PROPERTY OWNERS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 140. 2006-01, BIG FOX ROAD, LITTLE FOX LANE, HAVEN LANE, TESSiER ROAD 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Vi'HF-REAS, die Gent. Fake C:.iryCoundlordered Public Improvement Project No.2006-01 andsupported the workwith (fie sate ot'Gen.eral Obligati.on Improvement Bonds by Resolutions Nq.2006-06, 2006-07,.2006-12, 2006-16, 2006-17 and 2000-26 having held all properlynoticed public hearings and having provided all properlyp0bli.shed and otherwise delivered notices regarding Public Improvement. Project to affected property owners: -and WI4r:.REAS, costs have been determined for Public Improvement Project No. 2006-01, and the contract,price for said improv`ments *WS 157.S26. f 4; and the expenses incurred or to be. incurred. in .the making.gf said improvement. which includes every item ol'cost of the1mprovement from it's inception to it's completion and ail fees and.txpenses incurred or to be incurred in connection herewith amount to $83,699.69 so that the total. cost of the improvement will be. S241.525.83: Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED; by the City Council of the City of Geni Lake that: 1. The portion ofthe.cost to be assessed.against benelitted property owneis'is dedhit:d to be $241,525.83: and 2. Assessments sliall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period often (10) years; the,first 01ho installments to:be payable on or. before. the. first.. Monday in January, 2007, and shall bear interest.ai the rate :of five (5.0040) percent per annurn from thedate of adoption .of the assessment resolution: and 111e City Clerk, Nvith the .assistance of flee City':s Consulting Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement.against every assessable tot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he.shall !ilea copy ofsuch proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. and �4. 'Chi City Clerk shall, upon .the completion of such proposed assessment,:notify the..Council thereof. The litretoing, Resolution was offered byCounoilorSchjWng and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was cleclUe f ailo led based upon the foliowing vote - NAME EMEO.TT. WATSON RASMUSSEIN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE f4ye t1 ye A,tie Ark Ave ATTEST 1, Frederic C. ivlagnusbn,. the duly'qualiiied City Clerk: ofthe .City of Gent Lake, Cogoty.of.Rainsey State -of Minnesota, clo herEbv certify that the foregoing Resolution is il *true andaccurate f-eprese,ttaiion of actiorrtaken by, iho C'ily, Council ol'the City ot'Gcm.l.ake on the date gist ten: .. Mredet•ic C. Magnuson, City Clerk t�ertieb Date 16' dc&Aex 9005 4-file: r�ssalut[Uit1200FYti'r20fN6 37 Page 3 of 4 CITY Or GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-38 16 OCTOBER 2006 A 'RES6LUTION ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROP..OSED ASSESSMENTS OFTRE COSTS OF PURuc IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Nb. 2066-01, BIG FOVU'rTL E FOkHAVENJTESSIE"R. STREET IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2006-38 passed by the City Council ordie City of Gem Lake on 10.040bec2004, the t'hy Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of completing Public lmplrgvcarlent i'iojecf No. 1006-01, Bijox/i,lttl.eFoxlllaven=Tessier` Street Improvements; and WHEREAS. the City Clerk has notified .the City Council that such proposed assessment has been. completed.and Fled in his ofticL for public. inspection; Now, Therefore. Be It IIEsSOLVED, by the City. Council ofthe City of Gem Lake that; 1. A .public hearing sha.11 be held. at 7:00 PM on Monday, 13 November 200& in the first floor meeting room of 'Fousley Ford, 1493 Fast CountyRoad L, Gem Lake,. Ramsey County, Minnesota 5511t1 to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place ail persons mvning.property affected.by such improvement will be given all opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment: and .. •File City .Clerk is hereby directed to cause. a notice of the hearing on the.prc posed: assessment to be published once it, the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the public hearing, and.heshall state in the notice tht total cost of the iinprovement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to ttte owner of each parcel described in tile.assesstnerit not less than two. (2.) weeks prior to the public hearing, and 3. 'nic owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to. certification of the assessment to the County AucIitol, pay the whole ofthe.assessment on such.property, with interest accrtred to the date of payment,.to the City Clerk, except that. no interest shall be charged•ifthe entire assessment is paid within thirty (3.0) days from the adoption of the assessment. The owner of any property may,. at any time..thereafter, pal to the. County Assessor the enire a nount .of the assessment remlining unpaid, with. interest aocrued.to. December 3.1 of the year in which. such payment is. made. -Such payment must be made before November I5,¢r interest will be •charbed through lbecemhcr 31 of the succeeding year. The it�re;;oittg. Resolution wo offered 'by Councilor Seidl ig and was supported by Cauneiior vosak and 1,.ns tired atlo rted based upon the Following vote NAME EMEOTT ... WATSON LtASMUSEtN _ . ; SCHIGL11�iG BOSAEC VOTE Aye Aye• A ATTEST I; Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly.qualified City Clerk of die-0ty of Clem Lake, County of Ramsey; :State of Vinnesota, do hereby cetYify that the foregoing..Resoiution i ee and accurate representation of fiction taken.by the 01i ' Council of the City orGem Lake on the date firsLAvPlrttW. x of r Frederic C'..IMagnusliri,City & of eb Date M ti J o-lilt: resoliilitml2(H}d+•vt02{}t)G:i$' race 4 of 4 CITY 00•GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-40 13 NOVEMBER 1006 A RESOLUTION AAOPtINIGTHE ASSESSMENT ROLE A'S•PR.CE PARED BY THE - CITY CLERK FOR* •P•LIBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-01 AND ORDERING SAME FORWARDED TO RAMSEY COUNTY FbR'A'SSESSII¢ENT AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY BENEFITTE.D. AND POR COLL-liCTION COM M ENC1NG W I'1 H PRO•PERTY'TAXES PAYABLE IN 2007. WH ERIiA.S, tile City Councif of theCityrotYGctq•Laka•did duiyordcr Public litProvcmcntNO.2006-01 which included - tile pstichi ng ttnii over)a.y cif 13i. Fox Ri�ad, tittle Fk Lane, and Haven Uric and the Patching end seal*coatinbof'fesyier Road: acid iVII•CR-EAS, said .work has .been completed in acc0dancc with the contract for the work as Certified •by the Ciry Ftiginccr:.and WHKRE-AS.. thr final :costs for Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane h.avc beat deterrnincd to be S175;5; 3.06 for the r ad%vay reconstruction portion of the project with )9 benefitted property units for ail assessntcgtof.S9.238.96 per benefi.rrrct property unit as as cumenl 1137U7061t} fa/k!a 2006I3i.gFo:tL.itdcFoxRoadlmpt•ovetnrnts).: and 111RE(WAS; tite finul costs for I.1;tven Lane have been determined to be $48,409..4.8 for the roadway.reconstruction Ijorri(in orthe project with 7 benefiticd property units>for an asscs me.m ofS6.:915.t4 per bcncfittcd property unit as assessmcm.t 937070611. (alkl.i 200611avert Road Iinprovemcnts); and WH EItEA.S, the final costs for'Fessicr Road have been deterinincd to be $) 9.50.8.30 for• the•road%"y reconstruction portion 11f ilie:.proicct with 7 bencfirted.property :units for all assessment of S2.,786.40 pei benefitled property imit.as atise3smcnt 437070612 (alkia^IlOtiTcssicrRoadlrnprpventcnts); and 11'lE EItI?.1S, ;he City C.ouneil of the City ofIGem takc has held a duly noticed public hearing lbr the. purpose of preseittm.g, tlic flna l c;osrs and assessinents to the.bencfitted parties and receiving ilia publll 'ti.itt)lllE fCgardtng the project; nwx. therefore, be it RES0LVLD. that the City Council of the City•ofGein.Lakc does hereby order the City CleWto certify the asscsserrents herein described. to Raimscv County Property Rgcor4s and Revenue for asseasntcnt. against real property as sho►vn:antf.. litir collection commencing with taxes pay;tbte..in the -year 2007;: and., be.it F.E RTIE IF:it Rf;SOF,V ED that the terin or the assessment .shall be ten (1.0) years and the rate of interest for the assessincnt shall be set cis fi�.'e (5:.9%) Pcileent with said interest calculated by Ramsey Counry Property Records and. Rey enuc a, simple f legit gist.. on the unpaid. balance cif the assessnient as of November I S ann.ual.ly, The foregoing Resolution %mr, offered by CourtCihor SexaVancl wits auppon.cd by Councilor Knsuinssrrr and declared adir Mrrl based.upon the followitu; vote; NAME CMEUTT �' WATSON RASW$SEIN:.4 SCHILLING VOTE .lye 1 Apt I', Frk:deric C. Miagttttsoi}; the .duly. qualified City Clark of.lhe City of Gent Lake, C`aatity of Ramsey, State of NhEm'-sola, do hereby certify flint tits forcgoingResolution is a true and accurate rcprescntatiiin of action:taken by die C11V ( cn>;.ncrl of the City cf Ciem Lake on the date first written. rrederir C% Magituson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy a• Inc:. resofutiuitt2(1Q6titw�tlU6-4Q CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-41. 20 NOVEMBER 2006 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PARTICIPATION IN A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AMONG THE UNITS OF GOVERNMENT COMPRISING THE VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. WHEREAS; the constituent units. of government comprising the V adnais Lake Area Water Management Organization entered into.a faint Powers Agreemerit.to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act in September of 1983; and WHEREAS, the governmental units.have now agreed;that certain amendment to that document are necessary; and WHEREAS, said.Joint Powers Agreement will expire at the end of 2006; Now,. Therefore. Be It RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute Joint:Powers Agreement reestablishing the Vadnais lake Area Water Management Organization through December 31„ 2011.. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported by.Councilor Bosak and. was declared adopted based.upon the following vote: NAIViE:; . ;;: .;,' :. 1VYEOT.T : ; �, , .;:':.':<;...:: � :..,<::.;.:::.�j W TSU. RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK.....::. U1'E r '.:; Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson,. the: duly qualified City Glerk. of the. City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey State of Minnesota,.do. hereby certify that. the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate. representation of:action . taken. by the aity Council.o.f the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. 20 , Vov mAex 2006' Frederic C.. Magnuson, City. Clerk Date Certified Copy o rig: resaiucsoo 2006\nozo0&4t CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-42 21 DECEMBER 2006- 11'1`1t 11EAS.; the City Council leas determined'a need to update, clarify and ex0and the existing coriirols-set forth in Ordinance. tit.):. 7,S and related to BuiIding C:cWes, Permits, Fees and the like;'ond H 1 ERFAS. the City Attorltey lias.p!•epared a draft ordinance known as (Proposed) Ordinance No: 78B for consideration by the c its: C.'viuuil: and WHERt-AS. &.duly convened public hearing was held do the date first written; now. therefore be it RESOLVED. that the City C'otrncil ol'thd City.bf Getii. Lake does Hereby repeal .Ordinance No, 78 and order Ordinance No. 78B e llacted en the datc of publication. it, the oflficial-publication of the.Cityr: and, be it FURTHER I ESOLVED. neat the City.11erk, is hereby authorized to publish .said. Ordinance No.78.B in summat) .Abrni on the I'irs*l possible-dtite, and, be it still URTHER.RIFSOLVf D duet the City Cquncil-will review the impaCt-of the fees containeil in said Ordinance No. Vtiri si.i {fit 1lkiittitS.tiil10. Then foregoing Resolution was:offered by Councilor. Schilling and )eras supported by Councilor Wraf oii and was declared led based. upon tits fol.lowini: vote: NAfV1E �: CMEOfiT VOTE Ave 1WSAk. SCH i' LUNG Aye RASMUSSEN Aye A I' f E-ST L f=rcdcric: C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake,.County oF.Ratnse�%; State of Minnesota, do herebj certifj !ha! the foregoing Resolution.is a true and accurate.representation of ' 'tioa taken by tlie.0 i"Iy Councii of.tbe City o) 6 cm Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Certif leb CoPB , / -T>'OM,coos Date cliier resufi�[icuts�2fil161'•v`o2tN)G-S � CITY OF GEM LAKE: RESOLUTION NO.2006-43 21 DECEMBER 2006 WH IRREAS, flee City -Clerk has presented a (Proposed),General Fund Operating Budget of8444,867 which includes a (proposes!) I' IN I.ev\ o f S311,197 and a(Proposed)Net Debt Levy. of S100,000 for fiscal and calendar year 2007 based upon best estimates Of Costs for running iltc City of Gent l.,ake in 2007; and WHEREAS, these estimates wctme reviewed by the City Council in August, 2006 and amended basest upon best irifornladon recei ed fromputsiele contractors, and revised oil21 December, 2006, and W E i k,lt'I ;45, the .CinJ 'ottneil slid -review the (Proposed) Budget and Tax Levy for 2007, including all revisions thereto as ol'the dale. first written: ns>�v, therefore be it RESOLVED, that the City Council ofthe City of Gent Lake does formally.tdopt'the 2007 General Fund Budget of .$444.,867 Which mciudes a. General TaN 4evy.of S-311,.t 97 for 2007 and a Dent Levy of$ i.00,000 as presented; to and amended by the City (.'omwiJ: and, bL it F l,1RTHER RESOLVED•tltatihe City Clerk is charted with Certiiying.said Tax levy to R��tti.uyCougty I'ropertp 7'arati{rnand tither glOvernmew bodies for whom this intonnati0n is required, taleibri' cliligResolit( mil was.ottcredbyC`oun.cilor•Wo on and was supported.byCpuneilbrBoUrkand►vasdtclaredurJr►pter( 0-1ti,t2d 11 oll [he. foihwtn" vote: NAME EM.EOTT I WATSON VOTE Aj,e BOSAK I SCHILL114G .1 RASMUSSEN Aye I Aye' ATTEST f • Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified. City Clerk of the City aFGern Lake; Coullty cif Ramsey, State of of Minnesota, dd flcrel-)N c:et•titj' tlrtt the foi•ego.i.ng Resolution is a true and accurate representation.of actioli taken bthe City Cou[lcil of he City i.iem Lake oil [lie date first written. y F riideric•C. ,magnuson, City Clerk Certi f ieb (top ," —Te0wxA9w .,0Q6 Date elite: residutionti`�t1UG:\f�>?p{�f,�i.,