The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 20062006 Resolutions Resolution Description 2006-01 Gem Lake Appointments 2006-02 Magguson & .Associates -- Administration 2006-03 VLAWIVIO — S ecial Taxina. District 2006-04 Belair Excavating Payanent 2006-05 1-35E Corridor Management Stud 2006-06 Bond Refund. 2006-07 Public Hearing on. Public Im rovements 2006-08 Public Hearing on. Public Improvements 2006-09 Amendments to Ordinance 43F 20.06-10. Sanitary Sewer Budget 2006-35 Fee Schedule 2006-36 Amendments to Ordinance 70, Repealing Ordinance 62 CITY OF GEM LAKE. RESOLUTION NO.200641 17 January.2006 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING INDIVIDUAISAND FIRMS TO PERIFORM THE FUNCTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE GGV$RNING BODY OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, RAMSEY COUNTY; MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the individuals-- id/or companies identified below have: agreed to. serve in the appointed positions identified .for the ticrind 01 January 2006 to-3:1 December 2006, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council ofthe City of.Gem Lake does het*cby.make.the following appointments: 01) Acting Mayor (In The Mayor's:Absence) Councilor'Hutch-$chiIling 02) Chief Building Official Mr. Allen Zepper 03) :Building Inspectors Mr. A1lenZapper.:Ms. Cindy Shilts; Mr: Jim Manteutel. Oa) Plumbing Inspector Mr. Allen.Zepper, Ms. Cindy Shilts il'a,) 14TS Inspector (New Systems) Ms: Cindy Shills .06) ISTS. Inspector (.Bi-Annual Inspections) Mr. Dale Eklin 67) Mechanical*IVAC Inspector Mr. Ailen:Zepper, Ms: Cindy Shilts Ott) Electrical Inspector' Mr. Jim Manteufel, Summit Inspections 09) Weed Inspector Mr. Paul Emeott .10) Assistant Weed IriMOctor. Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, L1.C) 11). Septage Admiiti$titor Mc. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson &.Associates, LLC) 12.) Co -Zoning. Administrator Mr.. Paul Emeott 13) Co -Zoning Adtninisfrator Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson &. Associates, LJ.C) 14) NUDES I.nspeetor Mr. Paul Emeott. I j Sewer Inspection/.Maintenance Contractor t I b/ a 16.) Snow Plowing &s..Sanding.Contractor T. A. Schifsky&Sons; Inc 17) Community Health Officer Dr. Roland 13irkebak 18). City Prosecuting Attorney Meslow & Olson, LLP 19) City Attorney Leonard, O'Brien,. Spencer, Gale &Sayer $ 2Q) City Treasurer Ms. Sarah Cobian 21) City Clerk Mr. Frederic Magnuson 22) Cif♦, Offices &Contract Administrators Magnuson & Associates..LLC 23) City Engineers. Short, Elliott & Hendrickson 24) City Planner Short, Elliott& Hendrickson 25) Ofiicill City Depository Pre.mie.rBank, White Bear. Lake. 26} Official City Publication White :Bear Press Zi) PlanningCommission Mr. Jack Hoeschier, Chairman Mr. Jim Lindner Mr. Derek Wippieh Ms..Kathy Robins Mr. Craig Rafferty 29) City Recycling Contractor Waste Management, Inc. n) l;aw Enforcement [contractor Ran is ey County Sheriff 30) . Law 8nforcen)en(Representative Mr. Frederic lvlagnuson (Magnuson & Associates, LW) 31.) Fire, Fire Marshall & Paramedic Contractor White Bear Lake Fire Depait:menf 32) City Code Enforcement Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson. & Associates; LLCM 33) AniiMai Control Officer tvlr..Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates,. LLC) 34) Public Works C.ommissiontr Mr. Jim. Lindner 35) Ramsey County League of Local Governments Mayor Paul Emeott, Director 2006 Councilor Tom Rasmussen; Alternate, 2006 36) Vi.:AWMO Representative Mr. Paul Emeott 37) Architecture &: Landscape. Consultant Mi. Craig -Rafferty Page 1 C f .2 Resolution No.:2006=01 17 Januury 2006 'rhe foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported. by Councilor Bosak: and was declared adopted bused upon the follo ing vote:. NAME ;EMEQTT.: .: WATSON :BOA AK . SGHIL+Z:tiVG ... ; RASMCiSS11N VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I. Frederic-C. W—Pluson, the duly qualified:City Clerk ofthe. City ofGem .. ake, County oCRatnsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby. cL rtif}' that ilie forepinb. Resolution is:a trub and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem, Lake or the date first written: -% 2006 Frederic C. Mt gn.usone City Clerk Date CON :o-file:.r olulioiil200616o20O6-0i Page- 2 .of. 2 CITY OF GEM ILAIKE RESOLUTION NO, 2006-02 17 January 2066* A RESOLUTION .ID.ENTIFYING- THE NEED FOR CITY ADMINISTRATION OF VARIObS�FUNCTIONS AND'APPROVIN(;7H.E APPOINTMENT OF`MAGNUSON & .ASSOCIATES, LLC AS 'CONTRACT ADMINISTRATORS FOR .2006. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR.PROPOSAL. WHEREAS,. the duties of City Clerk.. of the City of Gem Lake have dramatically expanded -over the: last. fifteenyears to include .significant additional responsibility; and. WI-IEREAS, the City Clerk has. over finte.-performed many of these duties with only minor consideration of conipensation; and WHEREAS, the:requirements of the City have.chanbed and grown to include admill istrzttive and other setwtces beyond the.,origioai scope of the City .Clerk's responsi�iIities. and WHEREAS; Magnuson &.Ass.oci4tes,1LC has effectively provided and ormanaged theCity's needed administrative and other services since_1999. NOW THEREFORE BRIT RESOLVED.: that the CityCouncil ofthe, .Cityof Gem Lake hereby appoints Magnuson & Associates; LLC. as an independent contractor to provide additional Municipal Management and Administrative Services as Contract Administrator during the period 01 January 2006 through 31. December 2006. for fees as.descrtbed in accordance with their proposal dated I7 January 2006 and. retroactive to 31 December2006; The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Sc1i1111ng was suppotied by Councilor Bosak was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EPKEOTT' 'WATSON BOSA . ,S�H.[LT�]LVG .. RA.U?SS�iY.; VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye *e ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson; the duly.qualified` City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County -of Rai rnsey, Siare of` Minnesota -do hereby.certify that the foregoing Resolution is a tnie and accurale.repiesentation ol'action taken by the City Council of the. City -of Gem Lake. on.the date first written. FmdOric C. Magnusoisx City Clerk Date &rtif ieb &PU 01t:t re oiut6fi\2os6\naxoob-o2 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOIYUTION NO. 2406-03 17 JANUARY 2006 A 11E8OL1 tko N IN SUPPORT OF DESIGNA.TiNG VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION* (..VLAWMO) AS A 5PIECIA4-TAXING 161STRIC.T UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES-275,066. WHEREAS, VLAWM"O isa Joint Powers Management Qrganization established. for the General Purpose of 'to (1) protect, preserve and use natural surface. and groundwater storage .and retention systems; arid, (2) minimize capital expend ituresttecessary to.cor.rect flooding and water quality problems; and, (3) identify and.plari for means to.effeOively protect and improve.surface and groundwater quality; and;.(4)establish more uniform local policies and official controls for-surllace and groundwater management; and (5) prevent erosion of soil into:surface water-systeins; and (0) promote - .groundwater recharge; and (7) protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat-attif water*recreational facilities-aridsecure. other *benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater.; and WHEREAS, members cif the.JointPowers Water Management Organization currently support VL.AWM0- thfoug4 general fund budgets or utility fee budgets; and WHEREAS, VLAWMO members have found this funding method to be inequitable with. residents outside of VLAWMO jurisdiction paying.fortwo watershed budgets; and WHEREAS. the ability to levy for planning and implementation of Water Plans and Projects is provided to Water Ylanagement Organizations (WMO) under in Statute Section 1 311241; and WHEREAS,. VLA WMO has been advised that.designation as a Special Taxing District under Minnesota Statute $ectton 2.75:066 is required to allow this Water MattagetnentOrganizationto.levya tax, with the precedent ofMiddle Mississippi WMO. now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Pity Cotmcil of the City of Gent Lake:§upports the inclusion of the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization under Minnesota Statutes Section275,066 as. a. Special Taxing District through. legislative act on,. 'I'Iieforegoing.Resoluiion was.offered by CowicilorSeiii[iirrg andvmg.supp6rted.by Councilor Wasson and was d(�clared urlu )tecl based'u ti the.followin r: vote: NAME IEM C3 WA-TS!D RAS:M.USSEK' SCHILLING BOSA'K VOT19 Aye Aye Aye F Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the. duly. gttalified. City Clerk9f.the. City. of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minneisota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true. and accurate:representation of.act ion taken by the Citv Council of -the City -of Gem Lake on the date first written, Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date a1;erti..�ieb� �c i c-riles nsolution'2006%.no2006-63 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-04 17 Untiaryr 2006 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING' FINAL PAYMENT TO BELAtR EXCAVATING FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2004-01 AND THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE .GEM LAKE :SEWER INVESTMENT ACCOUNT TO SUPPORT PROJECT COMPLETION. WHEREAS, Bel Air Excavating has completed the work for which it contracted with the City of Gem Lake: to the satisfaction of SEI3, lnc.. as demonstrated in -the 29 November2QQ0`1etter from Dave Mitchell to the City acting as Gern Lake's City and Project Engineers.; and WHEREAS, the balance required to. complete paymeiits. for the project i§ $27,217.1-4 which agrees with. accounting: Previously approved with the.assessment for this-projeect; and WHEREAS,.capitai required*to complete payments-forthe project has primarily been.held in the Capital. Projects Fund established for.. the.prcject.which has a.citrrent balance of $7;7.87.42; and WHEREAS, it.is the recommendation ofthe..Q4 Administratorthat the Capital Projects FUhd*be kept otieri with finds.not to exceed $600.00 for an additional laeriod bfsixty (60) days to provide a vehicle to pay previously approved of unanticipated expenses; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED - that the City Council of the City. of Gem Lake does hereby authorize the transfer of nineteen -thousand four -hundred. twenty-niheand 72!100ths (S19,429.72) dollars from the Sewer Investment Fund to the Capital Projects Fund: and; be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Take does. hereby authorize final payment In the amount of twenty-seven thousand two -hundred seventeen and fourteen one -hundredths ($27;2.17.1.4) dollars; and, be it FURTHER RESOLV9Q:that.the..City Councilofthe Citypf Gem Lake does.hereby Order the Capital No Fuiid closed on or before the last day. of March 2Q06 for a period not le&5:thari.tW9 (2) bank statement.periods and, be it FURTHER RES6LVEI?i.titat:the City Council of the City. of.Gem Like -does hereby:order the Capital Projects Fund re -opened with deposits from investment funds as necessary to further fund Capital Projects ordered .for 2006; and. be it FURTH Ek RES..OLVED. that the City Council ofthe City ofGem Lake does hereby.order all future administrative and miscellaneous operating expenseir. for Pubiic4ittprovern ent Project No.:2004-01 W be.:paid fi-om the Sewer Fund. The foregoing Resolution was offered -by Councilor Walsdn-and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was declared bdb red based upon the folio win vote: NAME E11d Q'i7' i?IFATSON RASM.USSEN : SC.HILLMIT :; . ROSAK VOTE Aye Ave Aye Aye. Rye ATTEST l.:Frederic C.: Magnuson, the. duly qualified City -Clerk of.ihe. City. of Gem Lake. County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota; do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution: is a true and acct;rate repre,sentation:gf action taken by the City Council of the City of Geni Lake enrthe--date-first written. 01 OF 01 /Oi Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk.. Date m;ertifiieb �%� .cdite; r"fu6onl200\bo1090-04 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-05 21 February.2000 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZ.l. NG PARTICIPATION IN TH.E COST SHARING OF CONSULTANT SERVICES TO. TH)C ONGOING I-35E CORRIDOR .MANAG)EMENT:STUDY. W I-I:ER9A$, tho City of i6emLa.ke has partially. funded.and participated in the multi jurisdictionaf study of the 1305E Corridor: and WIJERC, AS,°the Giiy of Gem -lake has cotnmitted.to continue participation gs amembee iit.the.1-35F Corridor Management Team; and NV.H FREAS, the Corridor Management Team-will-continud to:coordinate the ongoing balance of land use and transportation within the 1-35E, Corridor.: ant WliEREAS, :co.ntinueld.consuitant services will.be required to assist the. Corridor Management Teain;.and W Fi [;REAS, S-EH, Ittc. has prepared a scope of services to.provide such assistance at a cost to the members in 2004 not to exceed $4 500 for budgeted operations: and WHEREAS, the Corridor Management Team has proposed cost sharing contributions --from the participai.ing local units ofgovernment as, follows: the city of Vadnais 1 teiglits rc 25.0% the City of White Bear Lake@ 25.0°�0; White Bear Township at.25.0%;.North Ciaks !4.. I.&.4°b: and Gem Lake @ 7.0% and WHEREAS, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Ctamsey County acid the Metropolitan !Council have agreed to .provide. in -kind planning and technical services and project coordination through the course of study. NOW THEREFC4E BE IT RESOLVED thattheC tyCouncil of the City of Gem Lake agrees to contribute funding ail amount not to exceed S�62-.5b for;consultant:services from SEH, Inc: for the ongoing 1--35E CoiT..idorManagement.'study. The foregoing Resolution %vas offered by Councilor Watsoir and was supporied*-li�. Councilor Rrtsntussen and was declared ado tell based-u Qn thef0116Win vote: NAME EiVY:EQ'PT Wo.5ON CIC SCHTIL,IIKG RASM•CISS I�t VOTE Aye Aye Absent Absent Aye ATTEST 1. l!rederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the. City of Getn Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do herelia eert.ify than the foregoing Resolution isa true and accurate representation of action taken. by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake oil the ate first written. 2 A74maxy 2006 Frederic C. Mattinusan- City Clerk Date Certif ieb 'vrLopB c.-ftle: resolutiai4tlUGb�o2U(Ha-�){ iCITYOF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-06 21 February 2006 A. RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF GEM. LAKE, RAMSEY COUNTY,.MINNESOTA TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN ORIGINAL EXPENDITURES FOR GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES..FRO.M THE PROCEEDS OF EXEMPT BONDS TO. BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, .RAMSEY COUNTY, .MiNNE50TA AFTER THE PAYMENT OF SUCH ORIGINAL EXPENDITURES. WHERCAS., TreasuryR.egulatioiis, Section.1.T50-2 (the"ReiinbursenientRegulation'),prbmulgated pirrsiiantto Section 150. of the Internal Revenue Code of 1.996 as amended (the "Cade"), provides that the allocation of proceeds .of.tax- exempt bonds to expenditures for governmental purposes originally paid front a source otherthan stick'tax-exempt bonds will.be treated as expenditures of suc11 tax-exempt bonds only if certain requirements of the. Reimbursement Regulation are satisfied by the issuer of such tax-exerript blinds; and WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake, -Ramsey County, Minnesota, a statutory city and•a political subdivision of;he State (if Miilnesiita (the. "City"), expects -to incur certain original expenditures .for governmental purposes to be financed temporarily from sources other. than proceeds of tax=exempt bonds and which are expected to be reimbursed from the proceeds of one or more series tax-tkempt bonds; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, by the. City. Council of the City of Gem Lake as follows: 1. The City has a reasonable expectation (within the meaning.of Treasury Regulations, Section 1.148-1(b)) that it.. will make expenditures for the projects generally described. in EXHIBIT A attached to. this resolution (tile "Projects`'}. Tlie..City lias.a. reasonable expectation that it w'tll.issue;one.gr more* series of tax-exempt bonds (the ``Bonds' for each of.the Projects -in the estimated maximum principal amounts set forth in EXH.I.BiT A and.that it will make reirnbursement.allocations with respect.to such original expenditures from the proceeds of such .Bonds. '. The City Clerk is authorized to des ignate:.appropriate additions to EXHIBIT.A in circumstances wheretime is of the essence, and any such designation shall be teported.to the City Council at the earliest practicable date and shall.be filed with:the official .books and records of the City as provided in Section 3.. 3. This resolution shall be:niaintained as.pait ofthe.books avid records of the City at thee main adinitiisti-ative office of the city; and shall: be: continuously available during normal business hours -of the City on every business day of the period beginning not more than thirty(30) days after adoption.ofthis resolution and ending on the last date of issue of any Bonds. issued to reimburse expenditures described in EXHIBIT A. 4. This resolutionlias been adopted not later than sixty (60) days after payment.of any original expenditure to be subject toa.reirnbursement allocation with respect to the.proeeeds ofthe Bonds; 5: All reimbursernent atlbeations wish respect to the Bonds will be. made not later than eighteen (18) months after.the laterof- (1) the dateihe.oeiginal expenditure is paid;:or (ii.) the date the Project is placed in serviceorabanddned, but in no event more than three (3).yeors after the original expenditure. 6; AlIoriginal expenditures towhich reimbursement allocations are tobemade coiistitute:(I)capitalexpenditures, (ii) casts of issuance of the Bonds; (iii) expenditures for extraordinary,.non-recurring items that are.not customarily payable from current revenues, such as casualty losses or.extraordinary legal judgements in amounts .in excess Ofreasonable .insurance coverage, and for which no, reserve is maintained; or. (iv) a grant (as defined in Treasury Regulations, Section 1.149-6(d)(4), as. a: transfer far a governmental purpose of nioriey or property to a transferee that is, not a related party to or.an agent of the transferorwith respectrtq whicli nt#obligation or condition is:irnposed to directly or indirectly repay any amount to the transferor). 7. The limitations set forth. in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this resolut'ion.do riot apply to: (I) the costs of'issuance of the Bonds jii) an: amount not iii.excess of the. lesser of.S.100,000 or five (5%)'percent of the proceeds ofthe.Bonds, or (iii) .preliminary expenditures tip to an amount not in excess of twenty (20%) percent of the aggregate issue price: of the Bonds.that .finance or are reasonably expected by the City to finance the Projects for which the preliminary exl eriditures:were incurred. The term ."preliniinatvexpenditui-es"includes architectural, engineering, surveyjgg, soil testing; reimbursement for brand issuance, and similar.costs that are incurred prior;o commencement of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a Project, other than land acquisition; site preparation, and similar costs incident. to cormmencemenr.of construction. 8.: This resolution is an expression ofthe.reasonable e.xpectationsofthe City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City. as. of the date hereof. The aoticipWO. otiginal expenditures. for the Wj.ecfs set :forth at Exhibit A and the. principal amount.of:the. Bonds set forth in *EXHIBI-T A are consistent with the Eity's budgetary and. financial circumstaftces. No source other than Bonds to be issued bythe City are. or are reasonably expected to be,. reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside: pbisuanrto the Cit:y's budget or financial policies to pay such Project expenditures. 9. -fltis. resoludoh is intended to constitute a declaration of official .intent for purposes of the R6nibursemezit Re�,ulatibn. 10: No reimbursetndnt allocation of the proceeds of the. Bonds to Project expenditures will employ an abusive arbitrage device (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations, Section I:.I48-I0rtio-a.void the arbitrage. restrictions or to avoid the restrictions of Sections 142-7 of die Code. 'Theforegoing. Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported by Councilor Rasmussen and was declared adowed based upon the fotlowinf_vote: NAME E1Vl.EOTT WATSOIV. lfil►+fpS5Glv`. ' `SGIIiLiING B.OSAK. VOTE: Aye Aye Aye Absent Absent ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Maanttson; .the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem bake; County of Ramsey; Siate cif M innesola, do hereby certify that the. foregoing..Rgdhition is a true and accurate representdtion ofaction taken by the City Council .of.thc*Gity,of Gern.Lake on the date first written... i ErcdeO- C. Magnuson, CityCterk Date merti'�ieb clio�. z9 qdzoos c-file: n;.coladon\2000w.2006-06 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.*2006-06 21 February 200.6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-01 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS IS July 2005, City Council Minutes Motion by Bosak; Second by Schilling,to approve the feasibility study. proposal. presented by SBIH For 200E street improvements with. the .added condition that cost estimates for installation of infrastructure for city water and sewer be included Was unanimously approved.. 1:6 November 2065,: City.Council Minutes Discussion.followed. r..egarding the status ofthe Feasability Study forrepaving:: ig Fox Road; Little Fox-Lane,:Haven Road and "Tessier Lane and possible installation of sewer and water infrastructure with .M itchell. indicatingthe study would be available in plenty of tine for implementation in the 2066 construction season it approved, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2006-.02 CITY OF GEM LAKE.MUNICIPAL WATER PLAN 16 November`2005, City Council Minutes Mitchell then discussed the essence of his proposal to complete a feasability study for replacement ofsatritary sewer,, installation of storm sewer, repaving of Scheunemart Road, and implerrientatioit.ofPhase One:ofthe City Water.project for the business district....Mr. Norton was then recognized and discussed his:proposal to provide a feasability study to develop.a city water. plan .in accordance with the domprehensive Municipal Plan acknowledging that. Phase One; city Water in t}1e business.districtwould beavailab lefor inclusion in.Mitchell`s study. Motion by Bosak, Second by Watson to:atdolit Resolution'No. 2003-26 ordering -two feasibility studies, one_for a compreliensive.city waterplan and one for apublic improvement. project to replace existing sewer, install storm sewer, and install city water was unanimously approved. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N6. 2006-03_ PROPOSED JOINT'COMMUNITY MEETING HALL CITY OF GEM LAKE&'WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP 16'November 2d05, City Council Minutes Pollow nla discussion ofthe current status of the.proposed Joint Town Hall project with. White.Bear'1'ownship: and Motion by Schilling, Seebnd by Watson, Resolution No. 200.5-25 appointing Frederic Ma gnuson:and Craig Rafferty as representatives and Tom Rasmussen as alternate representative to a committee to pursue the Project and act as liaison 1p the Council was unanimously approved. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0.200&04 BUSINESS .DISTRICT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 16 November 2005, City Council Minutes M itche l l.then discussed the:essenee:ofhi§ proposal to complete a feasabiI itystudy for replacement of sanitarysewc:I,, installation of storm sewer, repaving of Scheuneman.Ro..ad, and implementation of Phase One -of the City Water project Col• the business district. Mr. Nortortwas then.-yeeoguized and. discussed his proposal to provide:a feasability study to develop a city water plan in accordance with the Comprehensive Municipal Plan acknowledging that Pliase One; city water in the business district would-be available for inclusion in Mitc*hell's study. Motion by Bosak, Second by Watsorr to Adopt Resolution No. 2005-26 ordering two feasibility iWdies,*one for.a.cornprehensive city.water plan and one for n public-improvetnept.-project to replacg existing sewer; install stoirh.sewer, and install city: water was unanimously approved.. CITY OF GEM ,CAKE. RESOLUTION NO..2006-07 20 Mairch *2006 A RESOLUTION ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPER NOTIFICATION OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY TO .BE BENEFICIALLY AFFECTED BY CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED AS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. PROJECT NO.2006-01 (PIP2006-01). WHEREAS,. the City Council and Staffhave identified the. need to improve city streets including Big.Fox Road, Little Fox Lane, Tessier Road and Haven Lane; and WHEREAS, several residents of Gem Lake located along these city streets have similarlyrequested improvements to these roads by. the City; anq WI ER9AS, by:Resolution. No;205$ 26, the Gem L o City.Couuctl slid order ieasability:studies for co�isicieratioit.o.f this Public improvement; and WHERIE A:9,.said feasability study has been prepared by the:.City's designated Project Engineer, Mr. David Mitchell of SEH, Inc. and delivered to and. reviewed by the City Council; now; therefore, be it RESOLVED. that the City'Council of the City of*Getn Lake does hereby order public: hearings on the matter be set before the Gem Lake City Council at 7:00 PM do Monday, 10 April 2006, for Big Fox Road. and Little. Fox Lane residents, at 7'00 PM:on Wednesday, 12 April 2006, for Haven Lane and Tessier Road residents and further orders. the City Clerk to prepare: proper pubiic4hotice of such hearings for publication in.the City's official newspaper and for.direct. mail to all benefitted owners of -real property in the City. ofGein Lake. The foregoing Resolution was offered*by Councilor Walsa11 and was supported.by Councilor Bosak and was declared dilonted based upon the following. vote: - NAME EKE TT...- ' ::..' `WATSON.:: :.<RASMUSSEN; : `...SCHILLING :_$. .O AK' .. VOTE Aye Aye. Absent Absent Ape ATTEST I., Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clork of the City of Gem Lake County of Ramsey; State of* - Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Re..solution is a.tme and gecurate..represetttatiQn of 8cfion taken by the C ity:Couhcil of the City of Gem Lake ort the date first.written. i Frederic C. 'Magn.uson, City Clerk. Date e-file: resolutio il20 ft020QG-07 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-08 20 March 2006 A RESOLUTION ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING AND. PROPER. NOTIFICATION OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY TO BE BENEFICIALLY AFFECTED BY CERTAIN PiVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED AS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROSECT N.O.2006-03 (PI.P2006-03). WHEREAS, Ramsey County has indicated an interest in turning back that portion of the street currently known as Sclieuneman Road commencing at it's intersection with County Road E. thence north to ..it's intersection with State Highway 61 thus making said street a.City owned street; and WHEREAS, .the City Council and Staff have identified the: need to improve said street including widening, repaving; installation of storm water management design characteristics; and WHEREAS. it is the collective opinion ofthe White Bear Lake Fire Department acting as Gem Lakes fire department, the Ramsey County Public Health Department and the Gem Lake City Council that. installation of city water to this business district is critical for the continuing operation of -existing. businesses as well.as develapntent of additional business in the area; and W EREAS. several.residents of Gem Lake located along thisstreet have similarly requested.sirnilar improvements to fhe area.described by the City; and. W HEREA-S. by Resolution No. 20516, the Gem Lake,CityCouncil d. id order feasabi I ity. studies for -consideration of - (his public improvement.; and. WHEREAS, the City Council did similarly order in accordance with it's Compreliensive. Municipal Plan a pttoposed plan.for installation.ofcity water in the City of Gem Lake with instAlatioh ofwater in this district as.it's first phase of implementation; and WHEREAS:. said feasabilit .§tudyhas been prepared by the city's designated Project Engineer, Mr. David Mitchell of SE.1-I, Inc. and delivered to*and revie:ved`by the City.Council; noiv,.tlterefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order a public hearing on the matter be set before the Gem Lake .City: Council. at 7:00 PM on Monday, 24 April 2006,..4tnd further orders the City Clerk to prepare proper public notice ofsuch.a liearing forpubliQation in.tlte Cjty's official newspaper and for direct.maii to all beneiltted owners of real property in the City Of Gem Lake. The foregoiita Resolution was offered by Councilpr.Bosak and was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared ado ted based u n the followin vote: NAME h'IGIEO "i' . WATSO.Eq'. ::1 ASMUSS.EN :SrCHIL'L)t�- d BOSAK. VOTE Aye eye Absent Absent Ape ATTEST L. l=rederic C..Maghuson, the..duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gein. Lake, Ctiunty of Ramsey, State. of Minnesota, do hereby. certify thatthe foregoing Resolution.is a true and-aedurate reprewntati.oh of action taken by City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first. written. FrederirC. Magnuson, City Clerk Date (Urtif ieb eon e-file: reso1udod120061mi20Q6-08: CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION-NO.:2006.09 20 March 2006. A RES10I.tJT10N ADOPTING AMENDMENTS•To ORD.INAN.C.E NO. 43F,THE ZONING ORDINANCE,, LAST AMENDED 15 DEC.EM.BER•200•',1 WITH SAID AMENDMENTS .TO INCLUDE: 1) DELETION OF' SECTION 18 IN IT'S ENTIRETY;. AND 2) ADDITIONF. . O NEW SECTION 18 AS.DEVELOPED BY.THE GEM LAKE PLANNEN .G COMMISSION ANp ZONING ADMINISTRAT4DAS, REVIEWED AT MULTIPLE PU BLICIIEA,R.INGSBEFO.RE THE .PLANNING .COMMISSION DARING 2004 AND 20059 AND RECOMMENDED FOR. ADOPTION IN AUGUST,•2005 BY THE GEM .LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City -Council of the City of Gem Lake did, in 2004, charge the. Gem Lake Planning Commission with the responsibility'bftecommending amendments to Ordinance No. 43F; the Zoning Ordinance, that would cause said local oantrdl tube representative of fhe .cotntnitments made in the Gem Lake Comprehensive Municipal Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission brought forth recommendations to the CitgCouncil in August, .2005 which; whlte deemed incomplete in other proposed amendment areas and in need Of fat hei study,:included complete .text for amendment of Section 18 in it'•s entirety; and WHEREAS•, the Chairman of the Gem Lake Planning. Commission .concurs'as of thisday4hat:the recommendations: for nmcndmmits proposed for Section 18, Ordinance No. 43F havtbeen made in accotd'aii&with the"c6mmendations of the Planning. CoAudissiop; nqW, therefore; be.. it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of (low Lake hereby .accepts the proposed reconimendhtion for amenilment.of Gent Lake Ordinance No. 43F, Section l.$ bydeletirig ibeeritire.section as shown in OrdiriaaceNo.41F, adding the new language as attacbed hereto.. as Section. 18, identifying •the revised•ordinance as Ordinance 43G, and ordering enactment of said r..evisedOrdinance No. 43G upon publicatibeia the City's;official new paper; and• FURTHER RESOLVED, that the-CityClerk is hereby ordered to'publishldotice of this adaptign in summary fo.rrn and that.Ordinance No. 43.G shall be placed in full force and cffec€.on,the date of such publication. the foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor.Em eott and.was supported by Councilor Bosak and was declared.adonted based. upon the following -vote:. ''• NAME EIVIEOTT <: WATSON -:RASIVIUSUN HILI ING BOSAK Aye Aye Absent Absent Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic..C. Magnuson; the- duly qualified City Clerk•of the City of Gem. Lake, County of Rathxy,-StaW of Minnesota, do hereby certify that. the. foregoing Resolution.is it true and accurate representation of action taken by the CityCCounccil of the City of Gem Lake on the:date firstwritten: 7'� F t/KCG a �t�tiT��%lLLldQ�i2 .�Q4Gt2 e�QQ6 Frederic C. Magnuson,. City Clerk Date •(t alli fiieb Cool; e-file: rwdutiou1Z0U61na2006,09 ORDINANCE NO.43F SECTION 18 - "LD-B" LOW DENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO BE DELETED IN IT'S ENTIRETY ` Section 18.1 Purpose 18.1 (1)The purpose of this District is to provide a means by which a critical area of limited size interposed between districts of widely divergent permitted uses may he developed to provide a rational, reasonable transition between properties in the divergent districts in a manner that is orderly, environmentally acceptable, and in conformity with the goals, policies and plans of the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Section 18.2 Permitted Principal Uses 18.2 ( I ) Within the "LD-B" District, the following uses shall he permitted uses: a) Business and professional offices b) Banks and savings and loan association offices e) Churches and synagogues d) Governmental buildings and libraries e) Greenhouses and nurseries f) Fruit, vegetable and similar agricultural dispensaries Section 18.3 Permitted Accessory Uses 18.3 (1) Within the "LD-B" District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: a) Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted principal or special use, however, such accessary use shall not occupy more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor area. b► Any supplemental retail use within the structure and related directly to a Permitted Principal or Special Use and conducted for the convenience of and use by the employees or clients of the permitted use. Such usage shall be limited to a maximum of twenty-five percent (25%) of the ground floor area or 400 square feet, whichever is less. No signage shall be displayed outsidethe building advertising this retail service to the public. c) Essential Services Section 18.4 Special Uses 18.4 (1) Within the "LD-B" District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by Special Use Permit: a) Private clubs, including athletic b) Golf ranges, tennis clubs and the like c) Research laboratories and offices d) Nursery or day schools, so long as play area is totally fenced e) Those uses and structures permitted in Section 8.1 f) Warehouses for small, high value items (e.g., electronic components) g1 Essential Service Structure. h) Other activities deemed comparable with those named in Sections 18.2 and 18.4 Section 18.5 Height Regulations 18.5 (1) No principal structure shall exceed thirty-six (36) feet in height, and no principal structure any partof which is within 300 feet of an "R" District or a roadway bordering an "R" District shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. No accessory structure shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height and no accessary structure any part of which is within 300 feet of an "R" District or a roadway bordering an "R" District shall exceed fifteen 115) feet in height. Section 18.6 Area, hrontage and Yard Requirements 18.6 (1) The following minimum requirements shall be observed TABLE I8.64 1 t AREA FRONT .A(iE' FRONT YARD SIDE YARD'• REAR YARD 24.000 sq. ft. 100 feet 35 foot set -back 10 foot set -back 20 foot set -back 'Set -back measured from the closest of any lot line, road, road easement. road right-of-wav or the like. "35' when abutting a street 18.6 (2) The minimum open space requirement shall be 45%. This includes green areas and areas not covered by buildings, by parking lots, by access roads or by storage areas. Section 18.7 Hours of Operation 18.7 11 ) The hours of operation forany proposed business use in this district shall be principally during the normal work week (7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday). Section 18.8 Uses Not Permitted 18.8 (1) The following list of uses, not intended to be complete, provides examples of principal uses not permitted in an "LD-B" District and that will not generally be permitted as special uses in an "LD-B" District. SECTION 18 TO BE DELETED a) Uses requiring excessive parking. which is defined as such parking which cannot be screened by berms, plantings or the like. / b) Uses resulting in excessive vehicle traffic which is defined as such traffic which is generally incompatible 1 with the lands and roadways adjacent to the district. c) Business uses involving regular as opposed to occasional activity on Saturdays, Sundays and/or holidays, or before 7 a.m. and or after 7 p.m. any days. d) Commercial manufacturing or processing or repairing of the type which emits noises or fumes inconsistent with abutting land uses or zones. e) Shopping center. f) Retail, except as permitted by Section 18.3 (b). Section 18.9 Approvals 18.9 (1 ) In view of the extreme sensitivity of this transitional District, all plans for specific developments within the District must be approved in advance by the Planning Commission. In addition to the other provisionsof this section and of this Ordinance, the following general criteria will be considered. a) Use must he generally compatible with the intent and purpose of this Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. and construction must meet the provisions of the Building Code. b► Use must be environmentally sound, compatible with adjacent land uses and zones, including sound, sight and smell, and compatible with the type and volume of traffic upon adjacent roadways. c) Overall density of structures including parking areas, walls and roadways, front, side and rear yards, must reflect the transitional nature ofthis District from high density in business Districts to low density in residential Districts. (PROPOSED) ORDINANCE NO. 43G SECTION 18 - "LDB" LOW DENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO BE ADDED IN IT'S ENTIRETY Section T8.1. Purp6se. 1.8.1.I The purpose.ofan "LDB"Zoned Distrief is to provide a meansby which a land area of limited size interposed beiween•riistricts of widely divergent permitted uses may be developed to :provide a rational and reasonable transition from the more intenseuses alloyed in General B usiness or Retail BusinessDistrictsto the less intense uses allowed in residential districts. The properties cre4ted in:an Office Park would.providc a:rafional and reaso.uable transition from a General Business .District :to a Resideittia) District. Any development shall be designed and operatedin a manner that is.orderly, environmentally acdeptable; and in.conformitywith the goals, policies arid plans of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Gem 18.1.2 The City of.Gem Lake has. designated all "LDB" Zoned Di'*Icts for "Office.Park" type development• for business or professional offices that primarily have regoaar working daytime hours. of operation. OfDCo.biijldhigs, office-condomiaium.buildings, office -showroom ktuildings,-rlelated service businesses and other businesset...dlat complement the appearance of the office environment•and also use rcgulardaytime working hours, are. also deemed sulta... for this -area. 18.1.3 As.:an 'alternate, development consisting of 'life -cycle housing" type residential uses. with a density:not exceeding one {I) unitper acre (Ntlual to "R2" Residential Zoning) would also be.considered..ose af.the.Density Zoning or Density Transfer System including clustering, as defined. in the Zoning Ordinance is encouraged in any consideration of this type of residential use. 18.1.4.A.mixed use development with office., office -condominium or office -showroom use on the -more. intense use side.of the development parcel and residential use in .the balance ofthe parcel wall also be.considereddaslong as the "lotcoverage" requirements in an "LDB" Zoned Distrietare followed. Clustering of the business and the residential -uses is encouraged to provide best use of the land parcel, providemaximum.open space and to utilize the. possible .cost reductions of the infrastructure and the services that would serve this area. Section 1•$.2'Permitted .Pdricipal.Uses 18.2.1 Within any "LDB" Zoned District, the following uses shall be permitted uses: A) Small office buildings; B)'bffice-condominium buildings; C) Business; professional, medical or institutional offices; D) Banks and:savings and loan association offices; E) Risearth.. laboratories, providing no hazardous. waste is produced as part of the research; F) Insurance company buildings. Section. I8`:3:Pcrmitted Accessory Uses 3.8.3.1 Within any "LDB" Zoned District,, the.following use(s) shall be permitted acbessory"'nse(s)i A) -Any incidental repair, storage of processing. necessary -to conduct a`pbrmitted principal or special/Interim use; however; such accessory use shall riot occupy more than twenty (20%) percentoPthe floor area.. Section 1.8.4 •S.pecial Uses or Interim Uses 18A J Within any "LDB." Zoned District, no structure or land shall be used forthe following uses except by Special Uae'Permit or Interim Use Permit: A).P.rivate. clubs, includiag.athledc or tennis•blubs;. B) O.ffict-showroom buildings; Q Cemetery;: D) Churches:and synagogues as provided .for in the Institutional Overlay Process in this O..rdinance; E) Government buildings and libraries. as provided for in:tltc Institutional Overlay Process in: this. Ordinance; F) Nursery or day -schools asprovidcd for in the Institution al. Overlay Process in this Ordinance; G) Any supplemental.retail use within the structure and related directly to. Permitted Principal Use, Special Use or Interim Use and conducted solely for the convenience of and use -by the employees or clients of the Permitted Principal Use, Special Use or Interim Use. Such usage shall be limited to a maximum of twenty-five (25%) percent of the ground floor area or four hundred (400sf) square feet, whichever is less. No s.ignage shall be displayed outside the building advertising this as a retail service to -the public; H) Those uses and structures permitted in Section 8.1 of this.Zoning Ordinance.("R2" Residential District).. Sed ion .18.5 Uses Not Permitted 19.5.]'The following list of uses, while• not •intendcd'to.be coimpleto, provides examples of principal uses NOT PERMITTED :in any "LDB" Zoned l [Whctand that WILL NQT generally be permitted as Special Uses or.Interim Uses in any "LDB" Zoned District: SECTION 18-TO BE ADDED A) Uses requiring excessive.parking, which is defined:as such parking which cannot be screened by berm.ings, plantings or the like; BY:Uses resulting:in excessive vehicle traffic which is.defined as such traffic which is generally incompatible with the lands anti roadways.adjacent to the district; C)Uses requiring ezcess.ive exteriorbttilding lighting which is defined as lighting thatcannot be.scFcencd from view by adjacent properties by b6Tmings, plantings or the like; D) Commercial manufaeluriirig; processing or repairing of the type which emits noises or fumes inconsistent With abutting land. usrs or zones; I,) Bpsinesses that op4rate contiituotisly during any.24 hour period; 1� Light. Manufacturing; G) Warehouse,, H). Shopping Center; 1) Retail. except as permitted .by. Section 18.4 (1); Jj Restaurants. or convenience food .uses. Section. 18.6:Flcight.Regulations in an "LDB"zoned District; 18.6..1 No principal business structtre shall exceed thirty-six.(361) feetin height and r!o•principal structure,.any part of Witich is within three-hundreA(300) feet.ofany residentialdistrict.or:a roadway bocderingAny residential district, shall exceed twenty-fve•(25� feel in height. 18:6.2 No accessory. tusiness structure shall. ex000d twenty=ftye.(25') feet ittheight and ho.k essory structure any part of which is within three hundred (3001 feetof any residential district or a roaduray bordering. any.resideritial district shall exceed fifteen (IS') feet in height. 18.6.3. All principal residential and accessory structures shall meet the. height,restrlctions .defined in an "R2" Residential Zoning District. Section:18.7 Requirements for Area, Setbacks, Frontage. and Yard Requirements in an "LDB" Zoned District •I8:7.1 The minimum lot area for business uses in any "LDB" loned District shall be twenty-four thousand (24.006 af) square feet: The.maximutn lot area shall be the maximum. size. of an entire Zoned. District: 18.7.2 The minimum lot size for residential use in any "LDB" Zoned District shall be as described in tbip "112" .Residential Zoning District section of this: ordinance. 18.7.3 The minimum business building. setback from any lot line.; public street right-of-way, parking lot. or. circulation drive shall be asset forth below or be equal to the average height of the nearest or tallest building, ' whicheveais sreater; A). Building Setbacks TABLE 18.7:3 a) Interior Lot. Lines. Interior Lot Lines Interior Lot Lines Adjacent R.Zoning Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 50 foot set back 35 foot set -back 10 foot set -back 20. foot set -back 1) Yards identified as the front yard will be detennined by the Gem Lake City .Council. 2} Set -backs measured from the closest of a! lot'line, •road;.road easement, road right-of-way or the like. 3) Sidc.yard .set -back tbirty4tve.(35') feet when abutting any street or.private.way. B) Access 'Ways & Parking Lots TABLE i R.7.3hi iPub1ic, Street W idth Service Road Width 35 f'ootwidth. 20 foot width Circulation Drive Width Parking Lot 10 toot.width 20 foot width 181A.All setbacks, frontage, yards and other requirements forresidential uses. in any "LDB" Zoned District shall. be as described in the R2 Residential Zoning District section of this ordinance.. Section 18,9 Lot Coverage in any "LDB" Zoned District 18:'` Z 8.1 T%e maximum allowable Lot Coverage for any "LDBoncd D istrict shall be seventy-five (93�) percent of the. total arert•of the "LDB".Zoned District area being considered. 1$.8.2 Calculatibp of Lot Coverage shall be the sum of the.areas of I), all buildings .(Principal and .Accessory, business and re'siderltial) determined by the foundation plan2:) the parking dregs and driveways; 3) the access roads; 4) the Ioading,:stortge:and trash areas; and, 5) all other areas covered by iinpervious material notpurposely used for landscaping. 'Tice total calb.dItted area shall .then be divided by the total area of the LD.B'Zoning .District -to calculate the percentbf]at coverage.. Thar calculated area coverage shall nat exceed the maximum allowable ldt coverage. Wetland areas and storm water- ponds, in any "LDB" Zoned District, maybe.defined as "open" area in these calculations. SECTION 18 TO BE ADDED 18.8.3 Use of the Density Zoning or Density Tiansfer System, defined in.thlMning Ordinance, is encouraged to "cluster" businesa•type buildings in any "LDB" Zoned District in areas furtherreway form at9y adjacent Residential Districts. Bonuses. for.additional density may be•provided :for by the. City Council, if. chfstering is used, Section 18:9 H;ours.of Operation for Businesses in. any"'LDB Zoned :District, 18.9.1 Any business uses in any "LDB" zoned District shall restrict theii hours of operation to 7 AM to. 10 PM daily. Notwenty-fourQ4)hourperdaybusiness operation shall beallowed•ariywhereinany"LD13"Zoned-1istricr: 18.9.2 Other restrictions on hours of operation may be imposed, .in the Special or Interim Use P.ejrmit,.on•uses in any "LDB" Zoned.District allowed by a.Spec't&(.or Interim,Use Permit. Section 1.8:10•Aceess to an "LDB" Zoning District 1.8.1.04 All trm&c to and from any "LDB:" ZonedDistrict must be channeled to a.primary public roadway.through driveways and internal roads devoloped speci.cally for the uses to.bc developed and shall be shown on ariapproved trafficplan utilizing curb cuts to create one or more:.accesses onto a primary public roadway. A) All traffic plans. shall require approval by the city and :the governmental subdivision responsible for the primary poolic roadway onto which development traffic will be.dilrected. 18.10.2 For all business uses in any "LDB" Zoned District, internal service roads. should be designed and .constructed to 66flitate and direct internal traffic flow, type andvolume to,a px.mary public roadway via the access created in. 1.8.10.1. 18.10:3'The creation or use of an authorized private way.in any MOB" Zoned D.istrictshallregnire approval bythe City Council. Use of any existing authorized private ways for•access to commercial or business development in any district shall not.be-at lowed. Sectiod48.11 Material of building construction to be -used •for a commercial structures in any "LDB" Zoned District. ISALI. All commercial structures constructed in any."LDB'.' Zoned District must be finished on all sides with permanent finished materials of consistent quality. Exterior wall surfaces shall be -face brick, glass or stone, or other approved. materials. Architecturally treated concrete; east .in place, precast panels or decorative block maybe acceptable if incorporatetlin a building design that is compatible with other developments .throughout.the planning. area: 18.11.2:No: building, in any "LDB" Zoned Districtshall be constructed of sheet aluminum, asbestos, iron,. steel or co rtugated .aluminum:. 18.11.3. Commercial structures with wood frame construction maybe allowed if specifically designed to compliment structures on the site or in adjacent residential areas. Section 18:.12.ltev.ic*s and Approvals required for development in:any "LDB"'Zoned District. 18A 2.1 In consideration of the sensitivity required in creating a transitional district to. be developed between. ,divergentuses, all plans for specific devblopments within any "LDB" Zoned D isu ict•must:bercviawed••by the:Caty of Gem. Lake: Planning Commission yr)ibse•fmdings.and recommendations to. approve;or deny the plans shall .lie prgscnted to. the:City-Council. The CityCounctshailreview the recommendations ofthe PlanningCommiAtih and shall approve or deny the platy as presented, 18,12..2 Development. plans for any"LDB1-'•Zoned District shall be presented in the form: of a sketch plan**ith all components of this plan as described in•this ordinance. and the City. of Gem Lake; Subdivision Ordinance including, but•not iimised to., a.11 Variances, Special Uses, Interim Uses and the like: to be;irtt:luded'in the.developtnent..ln addition to:the other provisions of: this section and. ordinance; the following general criteria will be considered when this plait is -reviewed: A) All uses must be generally compatible with the intont and purposg of* this.. 4ning. Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; and building construction must meet the provisions of thg building material uses:as. described in this section of the Zoning Ordinance and as required by the Building Code; 13) Use must be environmentally sound, compatible.with adjacent .land uses and .zones, including sound, sight. and smell, and compatible with the type of volume of traffic upon adjacent roadways; C) Overall. density of strictures including parking. areas, walls and roadways., front; side, and rear yards, must reflect the transitional nature of an "LDB" Zoned .District from the intense uses in adjacent business. districts to.the.less intense uses iKadjkti t residential districts; D) Signs in this district should bcmiriimized. Sign design shall be required and shown as.pari-of the initial site plan design reviewed by the Planning. Commission for approval. by .the City Counci.I:.All. signs in any "LDB .Zoned District shall be consistent in both. design and appearance; 1;) N'o..butdoor lighting' -should be allowed in this district. Parking lots may be lighted only when necessary during busihdss hours. Drily "security type" lighting around the structures should bb -used. SECTION 18 TO'.BE ADDED F)A•LandscapingPlan:focthe entire development site sball be providedforrcyiew.by the -Planning Commission and approval by the City Council to insure that adequate landscaping is provided by -means of berms, trees, shrubs or other methods to buffer the commercial buildings, parking facilities and -other sitp.areas from the .adjacent residential districts. The Landscaping Plan,includinglastallation and.maintenance protocols,.shall be in keeping with an upscale "Office Park." or, as necessary, a residential neighborhood. G) All bttildings in any "LDB" Zoned District snail be served by the City of Gem Lake Municipal Sanitary Stover System. City water shalI be supplied l"rom,a water.distribution system owned and operated by the City. o'f.'Gem Lake. H) An engineered storm water collection system shall be provided in any %DB" Zoned District to be developed. Storm waterponds.antl storm sewers to serve the entire Zoning Di strict.shall be shown on the plans submitted for approval. CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION 140. 20.06-10 20 MARCH 2O06 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 2006 BUii?CxET OF $54,087 FOR OPERATION QF THE GEM LAKE .MIJ.N1CIPAL SANIVAiky SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND. WHEREAS; the City trlerk-teas presented a (Proposed) Sewer Enterpnse Forid.Btidget for fiscal and calendar year 2006 based upon:best estimates.oftitecosts associated*Withongoingoperations of theCityofGem Lake Municipal Sanitary Sewer Enterprise in 2006; anO* WHEREAS, these estimates have been reviewed by the .City Council .at Ws. regular :meeting in: March; 2006 including amendments based upon best inforrriatioh received from outside contractors; now, therefore lie. it RESOLVED, tliat ihe;City Council -of the City.of Gem Lake does formally adopt the 2006 Sewer. Fund Budget.of $54,087 as prepared liy the City Clerk; and,'.bb it FURTHER RESOLVED,.thatthe increased rate for discharge into the mimidipal.sanitary sewersystem of$17100 per thousand ,allons ($ f2S.67 per 1.00 cubic feet) discharged for commercial users, $112:00 anntially per single family household, and $43.00 prr quarter minimum billing be established and the Gem Lake Fee Schedttlepreviously adopted be amended for implementation of these fees so as to affect billing of Second Quarter usage. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported.byCouncilor. Bosak and was declared adr> >ted based upon the following vote; NAME EP6YE0'L?7'': .`V;ATSON.::.:.:: . `:RASMUSSEi� :' VOTE Aye Aye. Abse # Absent Aye ATTEST 1.17rederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified. City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, -County of Ramsey, State jpf Minnesota, do a lie reby certify that the foregoing Resolution is true and accurate representation of action taken. by the City Counci.l:of the. City of Gem Lake oh thee date first written.. .20 2006' Frederic C: Magnuson, City Clerk &"ifnob. Copg Date e-file: reso1uuotA24)00Xs i2000-i(I CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2005-35 .19 December 2005. WHER)~AS, the City o f Gem Lake provides services; as well as. dissemination of public .information to.all persons iri accordance with United States, State of Minnesota,.Courrty of Ramsey, and City of Gem Lake laws and ordinances; and. WHEREAS, said services.and dissemination ofir}formation ltave.-exceptional costs associated with providing same to thegeneral public which are beyond budgeted costs; and WH EREAS, the Ciy of Gem Lake wlshes:to establish afair and uniform basis for providing said services and information to all persons so requesting. NOW THEREFORE .BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby establish. and approve [lie mates and fees set forth in the'"CITY OF GEM LAKE. 2000.FEE SCrfEEiULE" attached hereto for the use of.the City staff in providing said services and*informat'ion, said rates to become effective on the first day of January 200¢ and to be-re.viewed annually thereafter unless otherwise required. The foregoing Resolution was.offered by Council MemberSchilling and was supported by Council Member Bnsak and was. declared adopted based upon the folio. wing .vote: NAME: EMEOTT WATSON Bt3SAiK IIiLGY1�G Itr1SMiJSS.EN.:.;; VOTE Aye -Ayg- Aye Aye Aye - ATTEST I; Frederic C. Magnuson; the duly qualified City Clerk:ofthe City of Gern Lake, County of Ramsey,. State of Minnesota; do herby certify that the foregoing Resol4t.ion is a true and. -accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the,City of Gem Lake on: the date first written. xe is eQ an :49 Oeomniex 2005 1,reaerrc C. magnuson, crty Clerk Certi f eb (top Date c-file- n-.o1uti01A,2005.%i1o2005-35 .CITY OF GEM. LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2005-36 19 DECEMBER 2005 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE.AM:ENDMENT OF ORDINANCE NO. 70, AN ORDiNANCEIREPEALINGORDINANCE NO.62 AND PROVIDING FOR COMPENSATION FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. WHEREAS,: Ordinance No. 70 was adopted in December 1997 and established the compensation for the Mayor at *$2,000 annually and for the City Council at $860 annually; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 76 has had no:.amendment .proposed..or otherwise considered in the eight (8) years since it's adoption; and WHEREAS, the cosh of living has grownat an annual rate of greater than three (3%) percent.annually or more than twenty --four. (24%) since 19.97; now, therefare, be, it RESOLVE Di, thattbeC-ity-Councilofthe City ofGemLakedoeslterebyorde.ramendrrtettt-ofSection 1.I of Ordinance No. 70 to state: as follows; Section L I. Base Compensation. The. base compensation ofthe Mayor and COLH161. Members shall be increased, effective 12:01 am on 0.1 January.2006,.as follows: Mayor' $ 2,060 per year Each Council Member $ 824-peryear BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe: changes b&ihcorporated and restated as Ordinance-No.10B, a surninary of which shall be published in*theofficial publication ofthe.City. l be� foreboing..Resoltition was offered by.Couacilor Bvsak and was supported by Councilor Wgtsen and was declared adopted based upon the foilowim;; vote: NAME:. EMEOTT WAlfSON RASMI~1$S " SCI ILLII G :BO'SAK.. VOTE* Ape Aye Aye Aye At>e ATTEST L. Frederic G. Magnuson, the duly tlpalifed City Clerk of the City. of Gem Lake, County of Raniseyy .State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the: foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation.ofactiontalo&ii-l�iythe� City Councii of. the City of Gem Lake on fl;e date first written. X . :/.g 0ecem4w 2005 Frederic.C, Magnuson,'City Clerk Date Certif ieb tt opg c-file: resnlulion1206�1no2(1.flS,3G CITY OF GEM. LAKE 2006 FEE SCHEDULE DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION & RESEARCH 01 - 5.0 Pages 8t3if-Addressed $40.00 per document 51 or more Pages Stampecl $ 10.00 per document.. Envelope Required + $0,15 per.page over 51 pages C`..OMPREHENSIVI> -PLAN Comprehensive Municipo) Plan S 35.00 per document Local Watershed.Management Plan $ 35.0.0 per document DOCUMi-NT RESEARCH Staf1'Time (15: minute minimuin) $:`;90.00"per :;l ou PROPERTY & ASSESSMENT SEARCHES Assessment Searches SAS Envelope. Required $ 10,00 per:address/PIN Property PIN Facsimile or Voice $ I OM per address/P.IN Legal Descriptibri Contact Ramsey County Property Records & .Revenue CITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. Outside Consultant:Services (Engineer.. Attorney, etc) With City Clerk Approval & Signed Cost Stiot'ing Agreement Actual Cost Billed plus 15*.0% Service Charge %oning..Administrator Staff Time (15 ininute minimum) $:9U;OO:per:l our BUSINESS LICENSES On -Sale Liquor City Statutes $2;000.00 annually Special Sunday On -Sale Liquor State Statute 1;:200.00:annually Wine•&. Beer*On-Sale City & State Statute $ 700:U0 annually O.ti=Sale Liquor State Statute. $100.00 annually Charitable Gambling State Statute :$ 10p.t10 annually Retail Tobacco Reseller 2001 City Statute $ 350.00 annually Adult Use Business License Adult Use Investigation 2004 City Statute 2004 City Statute $ 5;000_pU annually S 1.,000.0.0 origination CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, LICENSES & INSPECTIONS In accordance with established State. schedules and as modified; fr6ni titiie-to time, :the Building Inspector(s),*.State of NINII..and/or the City of Gem Lake.. Plait Review All Commercial; Residential Additions,. and Structural Signs B1d-Fees06 & Plan Review 17ekkation of -Dwelling Permit Per Sh-ucture-plus Building Pin-dit S 1,000.00 Demolition Permit Per Residential Structure Per Commercial Structure .$. I25.00 $.350.00 guiiding.Permits Includes Inspections Listed BldgFeesOG &Plan Review NPI)FS Permits Included For 1.0+ acres Disturbed BldgFeesOG:& GradingFees06 Plumbing Permits Includes Inspections:Listed: &. ISTS P1bgFees06 CITY OF GEM. LAKE 2006 FEE SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, LICENSES & INSPECTIONS (Onitinged) 'Mechanical Permits Includes Inspections-Lism MechFees06 Electrical :Permits Includes Iftoectioris Listed ElecFees06 Grading & Filling Permits Includes Inspections Listed: GradFeesOb (May Require NPDES ,rill Evaluation or Assay) Burning:Permits. Per Appl ication, 1 Per. Parcel. Per Date No Charge Fire Inspections Required Annually -Ordinance No. 77 FireFees06 Sio -Permits Temporary Signs (30 Day Limit) No Charge Permanent Sign : Replacement S. 50.00 per application Wail.M.Qunt Signs - New $100.00 per Application .Sttucturai & Free Standing. Sign New $ 50.00 + Bldg & Plan Review All Electrical & Lighted -Signs Abo'vo + ElecFees06 LONtNG, SUBDIVISION & LAND USE MATTERS Requestfor Rezoning Pbr-Request & parcel $ 2,060.00 Variance hom.Oity Ordinances PeT Variance 250.00 Subdivision of. Lands Minimum Fee Minor Subdivisions (2 v Lots) Major Subdivision (4+ Lots) $ 500:00.per application S.50.0.00 per subdivision $250.00 per iovcieated Special Use Pert -nit Per Application, I Per.Parcel $ 250Ab each interim Use Permit Per Application, I Per Parcel $ 250.00 each T T6pographical Maps Per Map (6 Total. for City) CD-ROM Version $ 250:00 .per map S 150.00 pet Cl) Aerial .Photos (Laminated) 1946, 1953, 1974, 1985,.2003 $150.00 per photo C I'I'Y .SEWER. & RELATED. CHARGES Residential Sewer User Charges Annually, Per [licit $ 130 {}0 COmmercial Sevver.User Charge Annually,.Pbr Unit $ 130A0* Industrial Sewer User Charge Annually; Per Unit S 130.OQ' Metered Sanitary Sewer Charge S 1:30 per 1,000.gallons. Industrial Strong User.Charge Per MCLS Sclieduie Sewer Availability Charges ]Mletropolitan Cduncil*Conneetion Charge -City of Gem Lake Connection Charge $ 1,550.00 S:650.00 Seiver Connection Permit Sever Changeover Permit New Construction Only Changeover Front Septie (Septic Pump Record; :Disconnect, Seal Included) $ 200.00 per permit S 1.50.00 per permit Sewer Reinspection Fee Reinspection & Call Backs. CITY OF GEM. LAKE 2:006* FEE SCHEDULE CITY SEWER &RELATED CHARGES.(continued) Sewer Contrapt;or License $ 1.50.00 Initial License $100.00 Annual.Renewal I S"f S. (Septic,) lnspecrions Even Years. Per Qrdinattcc $4.0.00. Per.IS- S IST.S Reinspection. Fee $ 90:0O:pei" l our CITY WATER & RELATED CHARGES eater Availability Charges City of Gem Lake Cpnneption Charge S'654.UQ The fees and, charges s#ated.nr referenced :herein were approved by the Gem .Lake City. Council on 19 Nceniber 2005 for implementation on 01 January2006 by means oi'adoption of:Resolution No..2005-35. Supplemental fees*noti stated hereia and as required.may be assessed by the City Clerk. Updated; 19 December 2005 41C FeW2MM200 AFeervN