Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 01-17 CC PACKETCITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY, 2006 The January, 2006 regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Tuesday, 17 January 2006, at 7:06 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Schilling, Rasmussen and Watson and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were City Engineer Stephan Higgins, Gretchen Swomley and Craig Rafferty. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, the following actions were taken: 1) unanimous approval ofthe Minutes ofthe 05 December 2005 Joint Workshop as presented on Motion by Bosak, Second by Watson; 2) unanimous approval of the Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 70 of 05 December 2005 on Motion by Schilling, Second by Bosak; 3) unanimous approval of the City Council minutes of 05 December 2005 as amended on Motion by Bosak, Second by Schilling; 4) unanimous approval of the City Council Meeting Agenda for 17 January 2006 as amended on Motion by Schilling, Second by Bosak. Magnuson then made General Announcements. Magnuson then presented Mr. Hoeschler's report regarding the activities of the Planning Commission, adding that Mr. Lindner has asked that they be amended to reflect his opposition to attached homes at Hillary Farm. Mayor Emeott voiced some support for the concept but noted it will be settled first at the Planning Commission. Mr. Magnuson reported on the status of Public Improvement Projects PIP2006-01, -02, -03 and -04 noting that feasability studies will be ready for our February meeting. He then introduced Mr. Higgins and indicated he has asked Mr. Higgins to establish an additional Public Improvement Project (PIP2006-05) to examine the depth and flow capacity of the Tousely Ford sewer and determine it's capacity to handle an high density development on the Tom Hansen/Bryan Hansen property combination noting that construction in and around County E and Highway 61 this summer may facilitate improvement of this sewer if needed for the development. Mr. Higgins was also asked to determine the impact with the MCES. Mr. Higgins then presented maps prepared for the PIP2006-03 Joint Community Hall project and copies of the as -built sewer drawings for south Scheuneman Road/Hoffman Road West and County E. Mr. Magnuson reported he would be meeting with the contract law enforcement group on Thursday and highlighted discussions from December. He then distributed a League of Minnesota Cities article on Leadership During A Disaster and advised this is what will be expected of community leaders in a wide spread disaster affecting our community. Following discussion of Mr. Magnuson's proposal for administration services, Motion by Watson, second by Rasmussen to adopt Resolution No. 2006-02 which approves the proposal with the following addition and correction: 1) mileage reimbursement per Mayor Emeott will be reduced to $0.445 per mile; and 2) Communications Development per Mr. Schilling will be added as a function to be performed was unanimously approved. Following the addition of Mr. Schilling as Acting Mayor, Mayor Emeott as 2006 Director and Mr. Rasmussen as 2006 Alternate representatives to the Ramsey County League of Local Governments, Motion by Watson, Second by Rasmussen to adopt Resolution No. 2006-01 making appointments for 2006 was unanimously approved. Following presentation by Mayor Emeott, Motion by Schilling, Second by Watson to adopt Resolution No. 2006-03 supporting the inclusion of VLAWMO as a Special Taxing District as provided for under Minnesota Statutes §275.066 was unanimously approved. Stephan Higgins was then introduced. Mr. Magnuson indicated Stephan has been appointed by SEH to act as our City Engineer in 2006. Mr. Higgins presented copies of documents ordered by Mr. Magnuson on Friday including: 1) as built sewer drawings for south Scheuneman Road; and, 2) additional copies of Gem Lake Watershed Management Plan for the Clerk's inventory; and 3) plans identifying all property within 1,000 feet of the proposed Joint Community Hall project at Otter Lake Road and Goose Lake Road. Mayor Emeott thanked Mr. Higgins for coming and indicated looking forward to working with him. Mr. Watson indicated he has attempted to contact Deputy Dan Ruettimann to discuss Gem Lake neighborhood watch and continues to play phone tag. Mr. Magnuson indicated he would let Deputy Ruettimann know on Thursday at the Sheriff's contract cities meeting. Mr. Magnuson also indicated he would forward all council members the updated . J property owners data in Excel format for their collective use. Page 1 of 7 Mr. Magnuson asked the council if they would like to receive copies of state statutes in the future when being asked to make decisions based on references to same by others. The unanimous opinion is that our policy in the future should be to include copies of all referenced state statutes when considering requests that reference same. Motion by Bosak, Second by Schilling to accept the December Treasurer's Reports as prepared by Cobian which indicate balances in the General Fund of $89,434.05, in the Sewer Fund of $44,006.71, in the Capital Projects Fund of $9,145.92, and in the Gem Lake Bond Debt Service Fund of $65,365.24 were unanimously approved. Payment of bills totaling $31,024.16 was unanimously approved. Following discussion, Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to transfer nineteen -thousand four -hundred twenty-nine and 72/100 ($19,429.72) dollars from the sewer investment fund to the Capital Projects Fund to provide adequate funds to make final payment of $27,271.14 to BelAir Excavating for Public Improvement Project 2004-01 and a small transfer to the General Fund for expenses incurred was unanimously approved. Following payments, the Capital Funds Account shall be brought to a zero ($0) dollar balance and shall remain at said balance for a period of not less than two bank statement periods. Subsequently, the Clerk shall transfer such funds as may be necessary to fund current capital projects feasability studies and to reimburse the general fund for expenses already incurred and paid. Magnuson then presented the final report of2004 from Ramsey County on estimated property values for the county, including Gem Lake. Magnuson indicated this report would be valuable as we consider the impact on property values of future requests for higher density, lower value homes in the area. Mr. Magnuson indicated he had also provided a copy for Mr. Hoeschler. The next meeting ofthe Gem Lake City Council is scheduled for 21 February 2006, as the third Monday of February is a Federal Holiday. Magnuson indicated he will publish the entire calendar as soon as possible. There being no further business, Motion by Bosak, Second by Schilling to adjourn at 8:58 PM was unanimously approved. AUTHORED: 20 January 2006 APPROVED: 21 February 2006 ATTEST: r J� Frederic C. N., on City Clerk 1J ATTEST: �� 'Ooz Luvwl— Paul R. Emeott Mayor eflle: minutes/2006/191janm2006.wpd Page 2 of 7 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO. 2006-01 17 January 2006 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING INDIVIDUALS AND FIRMS TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS i NECESSARY FOR THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the individuals and/or companies identified below have agreed to serve in the appointed positions identified for the period 01 January 2006 to 31 December 2006, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby make the following appointments: 01) Acting Mayor (In The Mayor's Absence) Councilor Hutch Schilling 02) Chief Building Official Mr. Allen Zepper 03) Building Inspectors Mr. Allen Zepper, Ms. Cindy Shilts, Mr. Jim Manteufel 04) Plumbing Inspector Mr. Allen Zepper, Ms. Cindy Shilts 05) ISTS Inspector (New Systems) Ms. Cindy Shilts 06) ISTS Inspector (Bi-Annual Inspections) Mr. Dale Eklin 07) Mechanical/HVAC Inspector Mr. Allen Zepper, Ms. Cindy Shilts 08) Electrical Inspector Mr. Jim Manteufel, Summit Inspections 09) Weed Inspector Mr. Paul Emeott 10) Assistant Weed Inspector Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 11) Septage Administrator Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 12) Co -Zoning Administrator Mr. Paul Emeott 13) Co -Zoning Administrator Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 14) NPDES Inspector Mr. Paul Emeott 15) Sewer Inspection/Maintenance Contractor t / b / a 16) Snow Plowing & Sanding Contractor T. A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. 17) Community Health Officer Dr. Roland Birkebak 18) City Prosecuting Attorney Meslow & Olson, LLP 19) City Attorney Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayer 20) City Treasurer Ms. Sarah Cobian 21) City Clerk Mr. Frederic Magnuson 22) City Offices & Contract Administrators Magnuson & Associates, LLC 23) City Engineers Short, Elliott & Hendrickson 24) City Planner Short, Elliott & Hendrickson 25) Official City Depository Premier Bank, White Bear Lake 26) Official City Publication White Bear Press 27) Planning Commission Mr. Jack Hoeschler, Chairman Mr. Jim Lindner Mr. Derek Wippich Ms. Kathy Robins Mr. Craig Rafferty 28) City Recycling Contractor Waste Management, Inc. 29) Law Enforcement Contractor Ramsey County Sheriff 30) Law Enforcement Representative Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 31) Fire, Fire Marshall & Paramedic Contractor White Bear Lake Fire Department 32) City Code Enforcement Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 33) Animal Control Officer Mr. Frederic Magnuson (Magnuson & Associates, LLC) 34) Public Works Commissioner Mr. Jim Lindner 35) Ramsey County League of Local Governments Mayor Paul Emeott, Director 2006 Councilor Tom Rasmussen, Alternate, 2006 36) VLAWMO Representative Mr. Paul Emeott 37) Architecture & Landscape Consultant Mr. Craig Rafferty Page 3 of 7 Resolution No. 2006-01 17 January 2006 The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watsoii and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was declared adopted h< —i nnnn tha fnllnwino vnte• NAME EMEOTT WATSON BOSAK SCHILLING RASMUSSEN VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake nn the rinte firct written Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb IMEL'opu e-file: resohrtion\2006�io2006-01 Page 4 of 7 j CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-02 17 January 2006 A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR CITY ADMINISTRATION OF VARIOUS FUNCTIONS AND APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC AS CONTRACT ADMINISTRATORS FOR 2006 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL. WHEREAS, the duties of City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake have dramatically expanded over the last fifteen years to include significant additional responsibility; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has over time performed many of these duties with only minor consideration of compensation; and WHEREAS, the requirements of the City have changed and grown to include administrative and other services beyond the original scope of the City Clerk's responsibilities; and WHEREAS, Magnuson & Associates, LLC has effectively provided and or managed the City's needed administrative and other services since 1999. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake hereby appoints Magnuson & Associates, LLC as an independent contractor to provide additional Municipal Management and Administrative Services as Contract Administrator during the period 01 January 2006 through 31 December 2006 for fees as described in accordance with their proposal dated 17 January 2006 and retroactive to 31 December 2006. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling was supported by Councilor Bosak was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON BOSAK SCHILLING RASMUSSEN VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certifiieb (Eopg i e-file: resolution\2006�io2006-02 Page 5 of 7 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-03 17 JANUARY 2006 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF DESIGNATING VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION (VLAWMO) AS A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES 275.006. WHEREAS, VLAWMO is a Joint Powers Management Organization established for the General Purpose of: to (1) protect, preserve and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; and, (2) minimize capital expenditures necessary to correct flooding and water quality problems; and, (3) identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; and, (4) establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; and (5) prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; and (6) promote groundwater recharge; and (7) protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities and secure other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater; and WHEREAS, members of the Joint Powers Water Management Organization currently support VLAWMO through general fiind budgets or utility fee budgets; and WHEREAS, VLAWMO members have found this funding method to be inequitable with residents outside of VLAWMO jurisdiction paying for two watershed budgets; and WHEREAS, the ability to levy for planning and implementation of Water Plans and Projects is provided to Water Management Organizations (WMO) under Minnesota Statute Section 103B.241; and WHEREAS, VLAWMO has been advised that designation as a Special Taxing District under Minnesota Statute Section 275.066 is required to allow this Water Management Organization to levy atax, with the precedent of Middle Mississippi WMO; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake supports the inclusion of the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization under Minnesota Statutes Section 275.066 as a Special Taxing District through legislative - \ action. J) The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling and was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared urfu >>rd based a ion the followin, vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the Zity Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. G'a-ec%xic -C /� -1.9 2006 Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb (rEopg e-tile: resolution\2006�io2006-03 Page 6 of 7 19 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-04 17 January 2006 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO BELAIR EXCAVATING FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2004-01 AND THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GEM LAKE SEWER INVESTMENT ACCOUNT TO SUPPORT PROJECT COMPLETION. WHEREAS, Bel Air Excavating has completed the work for which it contracted with the City of Gem Lake to the satisfaction of SEH, Inc. as demonstrated in the 29 November 2006 letter from Dave Mitchell to the City acting as Gem Lake's City and Project Engineers; and WHEREAS, the balance required to complete payments for the project is $27,217.14 which agrees with accounting previously approved with the assessment for this project; and WHEREAS, capital required to complete payments for the project has primarily been held in the Capital Projects Fund established for the project which has a current balance of $7,787.42; and WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the City Administrator that the Capital Projects Fund be kept open with funds not to exceed $600.00 for an additional period of sixty (60) days to provide a vehicle to pay previously approved or unanticipated expenses; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby authorize the transfer of nineteen -thousand four -hundred twenty-nine and 72/100ths ($19,429.72) dollars from the Sewer Investment Fund to the Capital Projects Fund; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby authorize final payment in the amount of twenty-seven thousand two -hundred seventeen and fourteen one -hundredths ($27,217.14) dollars; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order the Capital Projects Fund closed on or before the last day of March 2006 for a period not less than two (2) bank statement periods; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order the Capital Projects Fund re -opened with deposits from investment funds as necessary to further fund Capital Projects ordered for 2006; and, be it FU RTH ER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order all future administrative and miscellaneous operating expenses for Public Improvement Project No. 2004-01 to be paid from the Sewer Fund. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was derinred ndnnted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK I VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. -e , 4 &r W4 6 W 772006' Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb itopB e-file: resolution\2006�io2006-04 Page 7 of 7 City of White Bear Lake 4701 Highway 61 • White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 TDD (651) 429-8511 • Fax (651) 429-8500 Phone (651) 429-8526 December 20, 2005 City of Gem Lake ATTN: Mr. Frederick Magnuson 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110 Dear Mr. Magnuson: Enclosed is the 2006 Addendum for the Fire Service contract. I am also sending you detailed information from the City's proposed budget to support the calculation of the amounts due. Please sign one of the contract addendum copies and return it to me. The second copy is for your records. Please call me at 429-8517 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Don Rambow Finance Director Enclosures J 2006 ADDENDUM Service charges for the year 2006, as determined from Section 6 of the contract, for the City of Gem Lake shall be: $ 11,308 Fire Services 3,864 Fire Inspection Services 15,172 Total CI OF WHITE BEAR LAKE I Paul L. Eger, Attest: Cory L. Vadhais, City Clerk CITY OF GEM LAKE � �z Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Dated: CITY OF GEM LAKE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF GEM LAKE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED, AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR This Agreement is made on this 1" day of November, 2005 by and between the City of Gem Lake (hereinafter, "City"), an incorporated city and Waste Management, Inc. (hereinafter, "Contractor"), a Minnesota corporation. i� A. INTENT AND PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT. A. 1. The City currently provides it's residential citizens the service of curbside collection of recyclable materials on a regular basis and wishes to continue to support collection of recyclable materials for the good of the community, the region and the nation. A.2. The City currently provides curbside collection of recyclable materials by employing the services of independent contractor(s) operating under contract to the City, said contract having been acquired from E-Z Recycling, Inc.. A.3. The Contractor currently provides curbside collection of recyclable materials as an independent contractor working under contract for several Minnesota cities and submitted a proposal to provide curbside collection of recyclable materials for the City. A.4. The Contractor's proposal for collection of recyclable materials in the City is a continuation of a selection from not less than three (3) total proposals received and based upon ability to serve, availability of support materials provided at no charge, and recommendations. A.5. The purpose of this agreement is to establish a contractual relationship between the City and the Contractor selected for collection within the City, transportation from the City, and appropriate disposal of recyclable materials. B, SCOPE OF AGREEMENT B.1. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. If any portion of this agreement is found to be inapplicable under the law, it shall not affect the balance of this agreement which shall remain in full force and effect. 13.2. This agreement maybe amended in writing only, said amendment(s) having been mutually agreed to and duly executed by the parties. C. DEFINITIONS C.1. "Recyclable Materials" shall mean and include newsprint, corrugated cardboard, magazines, junk mail, tin cans (food and beverage), aluminum cans (food and beverage), other aluminum, glass (clear and colored food and beverage), plastics (bottles with neck only), and other materials as mutually agreed by the parties. C.2. "Curbside Collection" shall mean the taking up of materials by the Contractor of recyclable materials accumulated and properly sorted at residential properties within the City and placed by the resident at the edge of public and private ways. C.3. "Disposal of Materials" shall mean transportation of recyclable materials collected in the City to facilities for resale into appropriate reclamation markets by the Contractor. D. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS D. 1. FREQUENCY AND TIME OF SERVICE. The Contractor shall provide bi-weekly (every other week) collection services for all recyclable materials commencing not earlier than 7:00 am on the first (151) Wednesday in January, 2006. D.2. COMPLAINTS ON SERVICE. Complaints from residents will be taken and collected by both the City and the Contractor. The City will notify Contractor of all complaints received within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt and the Contractor will be responsible for corrective action in a courteous and prompt manner. D.3. MISSED SERVICE. When notified by the City or a resident of the City that service has not been received, the Contractor will provide service to the location by 7:00 pm the day following notification at no additional charge to the City. DA. CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. The Contractor shall maintain an office with continuous operation and staffing in a location identified to the City with hours of operation from 7:00 am to 00 pm on all days_ identified in D. L. Any change in location or telephone numbers shall be identified to 6e City not less than thirty (30) days in advance of such changes. D.5. CONTRACTOR'S VEHICLES. All vehicles used by the Contractor in providing service to the City shall be clearly marked with the Contractor's name, shall be of such design as to prevent materials from spilling from the vehicle, and shall be maintained in good working and clean condition. Page 1 of 4 D.5.a. SPILLED MATERIALS FROM VEHICLES. Any spillage of materials from Contractor's vehicles onto public or private lands shall be collected and removed by the Contractor immediately if noticed by Contractor's employee or within twenty-four (24) hours of notification by the City or it's residents. _ D.6. INSURANCE COVERAGE. The Contractor will secure, maintain at all times, and provide proof of coverage 1 to the City of the following minimum types and levels of coverage: D.6.a. Worker's Compensation Insurance Statutory Limits D.6.b. Public Liability Insurance $ 500,000 each person $ 1,000,000 each occurrence D.6.c. Property Damage Insurance $ 500,000 each person $ 1,000,000 each occurrence D.6.d. Automotive/Vehicle Insurance $ 1,000,000 aggregate D.6.e. The City shall be named as additional insured under the Contractor's general liability policies and shall agree to defend and hold the City harmless regarding recycling activities performed on behalf of the City by the contractor in accordance with Section GA. herein. D.7. OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS. D.7.a. All materials placed within the City for collection are owned and the responsibility ofthe property owner except upon collection of the recyclable materials by the Contractor at which time the materials become the property of the Contractor. D.7.b. All materials collected within the City shall be delivered for resale or disposal to proper reclamation facilities only and no materials collected within the City shall be deposited in landfills, incinerated, or made into fuel pellets. All monies collected for the resale of recyclable materials collected in the City shall be the sole property of the Contractor. D.8. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. D.8.a. A report to the City of all materials collected, tonnage or pounds of each material collected, number of stops for each collection date shall be provided monthly on or before the 20`h of each month for the prior month. E. RESIDENTS OBLIGATIONS E.1. RESIDENT'S CONTAINERS otherthan paper bags and cardboard boxes in which recyclable materials have been stored and placed at the curb for collection shall be deemed the property of the resident and shall, once emptied, be returned to the curbside. E.2. RECYCLABLE MATERIAL PREPARATION. It shall be the responsibility of the residents to prepare recyclable materials for collection as follows: —` E.2.a. NEWSPRINT AND NON -GLOSSY PAPER shall be placed in paper bags, cardboard boxes, or other suitable containers or shall be properly bundled. E.2.b. GLASS shall be rinsed and sorted as clear or colored. E.2.c. METALS shall be rinsed, sorted by type and placed in paper bags, cardboard boxes or other suitable containers. E.2. d. CORRUGATED CARDBOARD shall be flattened and placed in paper bags or tied in bundles not larger than three (3'0") feet in each dimension. E.2.e. PLASTIC BOTTLES shall be rinsed and placed in paper bags or other suitable containers. E.2.f. IMPROPERLY PREPARED materials placed for collection and deemed so by the Contractor may be left at the curbside location by the Contractor providing written notice is provided to the resident of why they were left and what corrective action may be necessary. Repeat instances shall be reported to the City for corrective action. E.3. UNACCEPTABLE MATERIALS placed for collection and deemed so by the Contractor may be left at the curbside location by the Contractor providing written notice is provided to the resident of why they were left and what corrective action may be necessary. Repeat instances shall be reported to the City for corrective action. F. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS F.1. PAYMENT FOR SERVICE shall be made to the Contractor by the City monthly upon presentation to the City of an invoice for the service accompanied by a report indicating the number of stops for each collection period and the tonnage of each type of material collected. Payments for service shall be approved by the City Clerk, authorized by the City Council at their regular monthly meeting on the third (3`d) Monday of the month , and forwarded within five (5) days of authorization to the Contractor. F.2, AMOUNT OF PAYMENT shall be based upon a formula for total monthly cost of two ($ 2.00) dollars per household times 157 total households within the City as of the date first written.. F.2.a. The City shall provide the Contractor with an accurate count of the number of households to be served, said number to then be applied to the formula for total monthly cost with adjustments limited to quarterly adjustment to the billing for the first month of the quarter following notification.. Page 2 of 4 F.2.b. The Contractor shall present to the City any proposed revisions to the cost per household not later than December I" of each year at which time the cost may be determined to be mutually acceptable and applied to the formula for total monthly cost on an annual basis commencing in January of each year. F.3. COLLECTION LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY shall be identified to the Contractor by the City, including maps of city streets and zoning districts. Any new residences shall be identified to the Contractor on a quarterly basis and shall be added to the formula for total monthly cost in the quarter following notification by the City. FA. COMMUNITY RECYCLING EDUCATION will be provided by the City to all residences identifying dates and times of collections, Contractor identification and telephone numbers, and other educational and promotional materials which may, from time to time, be deemed appropriate and beneficial to the City's recycling program. F.4.a. Materials and distribution of materials provided to the City by the Contractor may be included in the City's education/promotion efforts when mutually agreed to be beneficial to the program. G. GENERAL CONDITIONS G.1. The Contractor shall, at all times, be an independent Contractor and shall not, under any circumstance or for any purpose, be considered an employee of the City. The City shall not be responsible for the payment of any taxes, federal or state, or other financial obligations incurred by the Contractor including, but not limited to: fringe benefits, costs of insurance, etc. No Civil Service or other rights of employment shall be acquired by virtue of the this agreement or Contractor's service to the City. G.2. All services and duties performed by the Contractor pursuant to this agreement shall be performed to the satisfaction of the City and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and local ordinances, rules and regulations as a condition of payment. G.3. Contractor shall comply with Minnesota Statutes 181.59 currently in effect and, from time to time, amended relating to nondiscrimination. GA. The Contractor agrees to defend, hold harmless, and pay on behalf of the City and it's officials, agents and employees any and all liability, loss or damage they may suffer as a result of demand, claims, judgements or costs, including legal fees, arising out of or related to the Contractor's negligent actions or failure to act in performance of this agreement. G.5. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this agreement is governed by the Minnesota Governmental Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (1990 and as amended from time to time) or any other applicable state statute, any state rules adopted to 0 implement the act and any federal regulations on data privacy. The City agrees to abide by these statutes, rules and regulations. G.6. All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Contractor relative to this agreement are subject to examination by the City, County, or State Auditor, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statute 1613.06, Subdivision 4 (1990 and as amended from time to time). H. TERM OF AGREEMENT H.1. This agreement shall remain in effect for the period commencing 01 January 2006 and ending 31 December 2006 and shall, upon mutual agreement of the parties, be annually renewable thereafter. I. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 1.1. WITHOUT CAUSE TERMINATION I. La. Either party may cancel this agreement at any time upon delivery to the other party written notice within a period of not less than sixty (60) days of the proposed date of termination, said period commencing with the depositing of such notice with the US postal service for delivery to the other party at the address shown in this agreement. 1.2. FOR CAUSE TERMINATION 1.2.a. In the event of default by either party of any of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the aggrieved party shall notify the other party in writing of such default and shall allow fifteen (15) days to resolve the default, said period commencing with the depositing of such written notice with the US postal service. If, at the end of said period, the default remains unresolved the aggrieved party may terminate this agreement immediately upon delivery of written notification to the other party of termination, said delivery to be deemed made upon depositing of said written notice with the US postal service. 0-1 Page 3 of 4 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have by mutual consent subscribed their names hereto. IJ FOR THE CONTRACTOR /-o,F07N NAME: WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. ADDRESS: 10050 Naples Street N.E. Blaine, MN 55449 TELEPHONE: 952.890.1100 FACSIMILE: 763.783.54� BY: / 03.; c 5 << nature / Dated �i✓„ �. `� ii . � 7 ���4 /ram � -f �' Authority / Position FOR THE CITY NAME: CITY OF GEM LAKE ADDRESS: 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 TELEPHONE: 651.426.6443 FACSIMILE: 651.426.6444 BY: Frederic C. Magnuson, It's City Clerk Signature Dated BY: Paul R. Emeott, It's Mayor Si,natw c Dated Page 4 of 4 —�AILING & SIIIPPING ADDRESS 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110 - 5231 Mayor Emeott & City Council CITY OF GEM LAKE 13 /69 County Road "E" East G6m Lake, MN 551 10-5231 REF: Proposal To Supply Municipal Services Mayor & Councilors„ Telephone : ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 Facsimile : ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 e-Mail : Fcmag @ AOL.com 17 January 2006 As the City Council is well aware, we currently provide the City with services that continue to dramatically exceed the description of the duties of City Clerk originally established and as defined by state statutes. As the magnitude and complexity of reporting requirements continues and additional regulatory controls (e.g. NPDES, ISTS Management, Development, etc), continuing unfunded mandates from federal, state, metropolitan and county governments, and proposed development of our community show no sign of waning, it remains clear that the City of Gem Lake continues to require management services beyond the scope of the City Clerk's job description. Still, this workload represents less than 0.50 FTE's (full time equivalents) and is inconsistent at best on a demand per month basis. We continue to believe we can support the City's immediate needs in the near future as contract administrators. As in previous years, we are prepared to provide most of the services required by the City on a fee for service basis. This will continue to al low the City to rely on our organization to supply needed services or to contract for select technical services as needed. By utilizing agencies on a fee for services basis, the City can accomplish necessary functions on a true cost -of -completion basis without the overhead attendant to having physical plant and full time employees. Similarly, we will continue to rely upon the outside consultants (attorneys, Dngineers, financial consultants, auditors, appraisers, and the like) who have to date performed very well for the community. Similar to prior years, our proposal is three part in nature. These three parts are as follows: PART I CITY CLERK: State statutes mandate that the City employ an individual to act as City Clerk. For statutory purposes, the employee needs to be bonded as he or she is empowered to execute documents and manage public funds on behalf of the City. This position may be combined with the position of City Treasurer. PROPOSAL: I, Frederic C. Magnuson, am willing to continue as I have since 1989 in this position on a part time basis for an annual salary of $3,090 with duties as described on our Attachment # 1. CITY TREASURER: State statutes mandate that the City employ an individual to act as City Treasurer. For statutory purposes, the employee needs to be bonded as he or she is empowered to manage public funds on behalf of the City. This position may be combined with the position of City Clerk. PROPOSAL: I, Sarah B. Cobian, am willing to continue as I have since 1999 in this function on a part time basis for an annual salary of $3,090 with duties as described on our Attachment # 1 plus assuming responsibility for all sewer billing and collections. PART 11 CITY HALL: In order to properly serve the community, the City needs to maintain a physical presence (City Offices) within the corporate boundaries where City business is conducted and where City records are maintained. The costs of establishing and maintaining a City Hall are significant - property acquisition, development, construction, maintenance, repair, insurance, daily operation and so on not to mention the property is removed from the tax roles as government property. PROPOSAL: As our agency is located in my home and we are willing to provide this service, we propose to continue to provide this service for a fee of One ($1.00) Dollar annually and other good and valuable consideration which is delineated in our Attachment # 2. PART III MUNICIPAL SERVICES: The City needs additional management/administration which includes, but is not limited to, the following functional areas: Financial Planning & Management; License and Permit Administration; Deputy Clerk; Zoning Administration; Code Enforcement; Chief Election Judge; Ordinance Maintenance & Development; Public Works; Special Assessments; Animal Control; Grant Writing & Administration; Other General Municipal Management. We have established and currently employ management systems that are capable of fulfilling each of these needs in a manner consistent with best practices. 17 January 2006 Mayor & City Council PROPOSAL: We propose to provide management, administration and enforcement services on an hourly fee basis as defined and resented on our Attachment # 3. The benefits of this type of relationship include the City's ability to maintain a physical presence with familiar staff who are already acquainted with the City and it's residents, both commercial and residential, already in place. We will continue to employ best practices in our daily operations. We are acutely familiar with most of the community's needs, both business and residential. Also, the City will not have to provide offices, storage and infrastructure with all the costs attendant to same. None of the property in the City will be removed from the tax roles. Finally, no full time or additional part time employees are necessary which eliminates fixed costs and management of both employees and their insurance, retirement and other related common benefits of full time employment. All of the key elements of our proposal are consistent with the community's desire to maintain minimum, yet effective, government for the residents of Gem Lake. In order to go forward, the City Council will need to adopt a resolution similar to our Attachment #4 which will formally engage our agency in the provision of services as defined. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this proposal. We look forward to providing uninterrupted service to the City of Gem Lake and it's business and residential citizens. Regards. MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC F.C. "Fritz" Magnuson, President encl MAGNUSONN & ASSOCIATES, L C A� Ur 06VIa � ' Sarah B. Cobian, Vice President MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC ATTACHMENT #1 CITY OF GEM LAKE PROPOSED JOB DESCRIPTION CITY CLERK 01 January 2006 through 31 December 2007 The functional job of Gem Lake City Clerk as originally defined in 1990 and revised between 01 January 1991 and the date written above shall be as follows: A. To establish an agenda for each meeting of the City Council based upon items that need to be addressed by the City Council. B. To act as recording secretary at each official meeting of the City Council, creating the permanent record of the proceedings in the form of minutes of meeting and presenting same for approval by the City Council. C. To maintain the official corporate record of the City of Gem Lake in the form of a minute book with appropriately executed copies of all documents relevant to the ongoing operation of the City and the decisions of its elected officials. D. To maintain such files as are necessary for the ongoing operation of the City. E. To act as liaison with the public regarding official matters pertaining to the City. F. To act as liaison with both private and public entities providing contract services to the City. G. To execute any documents requiring one or more signatures as necessary and as directed by the City Council from time to time. H. To distribute and disburse public information pertaining to the City in accordance with all Federal, State, Regional, and local laws, ordinances, and policies. I. To appropriately post and/or publish such public notices as may be necessary to inform the residents of Gem Lake of any pending actions. i. To review all claims for payment by the City of obligations on a monthly basis and present same for payment approval by the City Council and payment by the Treasurer. K. To disseminate all mail, correspondence, and other communications received or prepared to the appropriate elected or appointed officials of the City in a timely manner. L. To administer and execute, as necessary and as directed by the City Council, all (sub)contracts for municipal services including public works (plowing, sanding, sweeping, road repair, etc), public safety (police, fire, emergency medical, etc.), and municipal management. M. Act as "Data Practices Compliance Official" per City Council Resolution No. 2002-06. The job of City Clerk for a statutory city as defined by MN Statutes, Section 412.151 is as follows: 412.151 Duties of clerk. Subdivision 1. Listed; fees; deputy; absence. The clerk shall give the required notice of each regular and special election, record the proceedings thereof, notify officials of their election or appointment to office, certify to the county auditor all appointments and the results of all city elections. The clerk shall keep (1) a minute book, noting therein all proceedings of the council; (2) an ordinance book to record at length all ordinances passed by the council; and (3) an account book to enter all money transactions of the city including the dates and amounts of all receipts and the person from whom the money was received and all orders drawn upon the treasurer with their payee and object. Ordinances, resolutions, and claims considered by the council need not be given in full in the minute book if they appear in other permanent records of the clerk and can be accurately identified from the description given in the minutes. The clerk shall act as the clerk and bookkeeper of the city, shall be the custodian of its seal and records, shall sign its official papers, shall post and publish such notices, ordinances and resolutions as may be required and shall perform such other appropriate duties as may be imposed by the council. For certified copies, and for fling and entering, when required, papers not relating to city business, the clerk shall receive the fees allowed by law to town clerks; but the council may require the clerk to pay such fees into the city treasury. With the consent of the council, the clerk may appoint a deputy for whose acts the clerk shall be responsible and whom the clerk may remove at pleasure. In case of the clerk's absence from the city or disability, the council may appoint a deputy clerk, if there is none, to serve during such absence or disability. The deputy may discharge any of the duties of the clerk, except that deputy shall not be a member of the council. Subdivision 2. Delegation; audit. The council by ordinance may delegate all or part of the clerk's bookkeeping duties to another officer or employee. The officer or employee who by ordinance is made responsible for the clerk's bookkeeping duties shall furnish a fidelity bond conditioned for the faithful exercise of duties. The council may provide for the payment from city funds of the premium on the official bond. If the bookkeeping functions of the clerk are delegated to the city treasurer, the council shall provide for an annual audit of the city's financial affairs in accordance with the minimum procedures prescribed by the state auditor. A copy of the ordinance slial I be provided to the state auditor. MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC ATTACHMENT #1 Page 2 of 2 412.151 Duties of clerk. (continued) HIST: 1949 c 119 s 18; 1951 c 378 s 6; 1953 c 735 s 3; 1973 c 123 art 2 s 1 subd 2; 1984 c 384 s 1; 1986 c 444 Copyright 2003 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. The job of City Treasurer for a statutory city as defined by MN Statutes, Section 412.151 is as follows: 412.141 Treasurer's duties. The treasurer shall receive and safely keep all moneys belonging to the city, including moneys received in operations of any municipal liquor dispensary maintained by the city, and shall promptly enter in a book provided for the purpose an account of all moneys received and disbursed as treasurer, showing the source and objects thereof with the date of each transaction. The treasurer shal I pay out money only upon the written order of the mayor and clerk, or such other officers of independent boards or commissions as are authorized to issue orders in the case of board or commission operations. Such orders when paid and canceled shall be retained as treasurer's vouchers. Such accounts and vouchers shall be exhibited to the council upon its request. The treasurer shall deliver to a successor all books, papers and money belonging to the city. The treasurer shall immediately after the close of the calendar year make out and file with the clerk for public inspection a report of balances, receipts and disbursements by funds for the year. The treasurer may, with the consent of the council appoint a deputy treasurer for whose acts the treasurer shall be responsible and whom the treasurer may remove at pleasure. In case of the treasurer's absence from the city or disability, the council may appoint a deputy treasurer, if there is none, to serve during such absence or disability. The deputy may discharge any of the duties of the treasurer. HIST: 1949 c 119 s 17; 1951 c 378 s 5; 1973 c 123 art 2 s 1 subd 2; 1986 c 444 Copyright 2003 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. Respectfully Submitted, 1 Respectfully Submitted, IMAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC ' ) MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC .lam A. V000waft c F. C. Magnuson, President v Sarah B. Cobian, Vice President MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC ATTACHMENT #2 CITY OF GEM LAKE 1 PROPOSED OFFICE SHARE PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK & TREASURER 01 January 2006 through 31 December 2007 SERVICES In an effort to minimize the City's cost of ongoing operations and eliminate the need to lease or own, maintain, and remove from the tax roles in the City any property for the purposes of having a City Offices, we propose as follows: A. We will provide and maintain a functioning office at our location for the purpose of providing a primary mailing address within the corporate boundaries of Gem Lake from which all City of Gem Lake daily operations may be administered and delivered and from which all official communications will be maintained. B. We will provide and maintain primary storage space for City records, both in printed and electronic form. C. We will provide and maintain all utilities necessary for ongoing operations, including proper disposal of all waste generated by City operations. D. We will provide and maintain communication equipment to provide the Citynecessary communications, including but not limited to: l . Regular and mobile telephone services with listings in appropriate public directories. 2. Regular facsimile service with listings in appropriate public directories. 3. E-mail capabilities and, as desired, World Wide Web Page space. E. We will provide and maintain adequate office and electronic equipment to create and maintain needed documents and house official City records as necessary. FEES & EXPENSE SHARING In consideration of sharing of our office space with the City of Gem Lake, the City agrees to reimburse Magnuson & Associates, LLC as follows: A. RENT: To pay, net, a fee of $1.00 annually in January of each year for which this contract is renewed covering the period 01 January through 31 December of the year in which the fee is paid; and B. SHARED EXPENSES: To pay, net, a fee as expense reimbursement equal to a pro rata share of the cost ofmonthly office supplies required to maintain and operate the offices. For purposes of this proposal, the "pro rata share" shall be defined as the 1 / total number of clients served (e.g. 5 clients = 1/5 pro rata share): and C. EXCLUSIVE EXPENSES: To pay, net, a fee as expense reimbursement equal to one hundred (100.0%) percent of any amount expended solely for the benefit of the City of Gem Lake; and D. SHARED EQUIPMENT: To pay, net, a fee as expense reimbursement equal to a pro rata share of the cost of all general, electronic, and communication equipment necessary to operate the offices in a professional manner; and E. EXCLUSIVE EQUIPMENT: To pay, net, a fee as expense reimbursement equal to one hundred (100.0%) percent of any amount expended solely for the benefit of the City of Gem Lake; and F. TRANSPORTATION: To pay, net, a fee as expense reimbursement equal to $0.485 per mile for all use of agency vehicles for the exclusive benefit of the City of Gem Lake. Respectfully Submitted, MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, L F. C. Magnuson, President J Respectfully Submitted, MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC Sarah B. Cobian, Vice President MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC ATTACHMENT #3 CITY OF GEM LAKE PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE FEES MUNICIPAL SERVICES 01 January 2006 through 31 December 2007 In consideration of the City's desire to maintain minimum government while meeting it's ongoing needs for professional management, administration, and other services, we propose to provide the services listed below at the respective fees shown per service: MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC SERVICES Assistant City Clerk Zoning Administration Code Enforcement Financial Planning Financial Management Financial Reporting Chief Election Judge Animal Control Permit & License Administration Ordinance Research & Development Public Works Administration Public Safety Administration Policy Development & Administration NPDES Administration Sewer & ISTS Administration Recycling Administration Emergency Communications MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC HOURLY BILLING RATES CONDITIONAL BASIS FOR RATES Fritz Magnuson Sarah Cobian A. With City Hall Proposal & With Two (2) Year Renewable Term $ 78.00 $ 65.00 B. As Chief Election Judge $50.00 In addition to the rates above, we will hire special project team members at a competitive market rate and on an as needed basis. Special projects shall include, but not be limited to, elections, census, special deliveries, etc. made on behalf of the City. At all times and in all circumstances, it will be understood that Magnuson & Associates, LLC is not an employee of the City for any purpose whatsoever and is, in fact, an independent contractor except as related to Frederic C. Magnuson acting solely in his capacity as City Clerk and Sarah Cobian acting solely in her capacity as City Treasurer. The City shall not have the right to require Agency to do anything which would jeopardize the relationship of independent contractor between the City and Agency. Agency shall assume responsibility for Agency's taxes and insurance, except as defined elsewhere. Respectfully Submitted, MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, L F. C. Magnuson, President J Respectfully Submitted, MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC �. �. -Paw Sarah B. Cobian, Vice President res Publications Eugene D. Johnson, Publisher 4779 Bloom Ave., White Bear Lake, Mn 551 10 • 651-407-1200 • Fax: 651-429-1242 December 1, 2005 Fritz Magnason, City Clerk City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Dear Mr. Magnason, The White Bear Press wishes to be considered as your official newspaper for 2006. We meet all the legal publication requirements under state statutes. Our circulation is audited by Verified Audit Circulation, an independent firm. We offer submittal of legal notices by mail, fax at (651) 429-1242, or e-mail to legal&sherbtel net - clearly labeling them as "Legal Notices." The rate is $12.75 per column inch, in 7-point type at 9-lines per inch. Our deadline for legal notices is Thursday by 5 PM for the following Wednesday's publication. We look forward to the opportunity to serve you. We welcome any questions or concerns you may have. Sincerely, ds Legal Notice Coordinator J miscl:gemllg06.doc Your Best Source For Community Information White Bear Press • Vadnais Heights Press • St. Croix Valley Press • Quad Community Press • Shoreview Press • Forest Lake Press ppnews@sherbtel.net ppcomp@sherbtel.net ppadvertising@sherbtel.net ppcirc@sherbtel.net LAW OFFICES MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC 2125 2ND STREET WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55110 DOUGLAS B. MESLOW dougmeslow@Wbllaw.net ROBB L. OLSON robbolson@wbilaw.net December 20, 2004 Mr. Fritz Magnuson City Clerk City of Gem Lake 1369 E. County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110 Re: Prosecution contract Dear Mr. Magnuson:... Telephone (651) 426-1533 Facsimile (651) 426-6732 E-Mail: lawyers@wbllaw.net We appreciate and enjoy our relationship with Gem Lake, and we are very interested in continuing to serve as City Attorney (Prosecutor). We are proposing to go forward at the following rates for 2006: Out -of Court time Pre -trials Court Trials Jury Trial appearances 2002/2003 rates 2004/2005 rates 2006 rates (proposed) $ 96.00/hour $ 98.00/hour $100.00/hour $ 75.00/case $ 85.00/case $ 80.00/case $ 90.00/case $ 85.00/case $ 95.00/case $ 140.00/case $ 150.00/case $ 160.00/case As previously, our hourly rate applies to appellate work, preparation for Jury Trials and actual time in jury trial. We will not charge the City for preparation for Pre -trials or Court Trials; or for court appearances at Arraignments. As always, please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Very truly yours, Da. Meslow% Mes*& Olsons'pLLC DBM/sp J Robb L. Olson Meslow & Olson, PLLC CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-02 17 January 2006 A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR CITY ADMINISTRATION OF VARIOUS FUNCTIONS AND APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC AS CONTRACT ADMINISTRATORS FOR 2006 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL. WHEREAS, the duties of City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake have dramatically expanded over the last fifteen years to include significant additional responsibility; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has over time performed many of these duties with only minor consideration of compensation; and WHEREAS, the requirements of the City have changed and grown to include administrative and other services beyond the original scope of the City Clerk's responsibilities; and WHEREAS, Magnuson & Associates, LLC has effectively provided and or managed the City's needed administrative and other services since 1999. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake hereby appoints Magnuson & Associates, LLC as an independent contractor to provide additional Municipal Management and Administrative Services as Contract Administrator during the period 01 January 2006 through 31 December 2006 for fees as described in accordance with their proposal dated 17 January 2006 and retroactive to 31 December 2006. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling was supported by Councilor Bosak was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON BOSAK SCHILLING RASMUSSEN VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb CoN e-file: resolution\2006�1o2006-02 Page 5 of 7 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-03 17 JANUARY 2006 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF DESIGNATING VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION (VLAWMO) AS A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES 275.006. WHEREAS, VLAWMO is a Joint Powers Management Organization established for the General Purpose of to (1) protect, preserve and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; and, (2) minimize capital expenditures necessary to correct flooding and water quality problems; and, (3) identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; and, (4) establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; and (5) prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; and (6) promote groundwater recharge; and (7) protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities and secure other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater; and WHEREAS, members of the Joint Powers Water Management Organization currently support VLAWMO through general fiend budgets or utility fee budgets; and WHEREAS, VLAWMO members have found this funding method to be inequitable with residents outside of VLAWMO jurisdiction paying for two watershed budgets; and WHEREAS, the ability to levy for planning and implementation of Water Plans and Projects is provided to Water Management Organizations (WMO) under Minnesota Statute Section 103B.241; and WHEREAS, VLAWMO has been advised that designation as a Special Taxing District under Minnesota Statute Section 275.066 is required to allowthis Water Management Organization to levy atax, with the precedent of Middle Mississippi WMO; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake supports the inclusion of the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization under Minnesota Statutes Section 275.066 as a Special Taxing District through legislative action. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling and was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared adowed based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the Citv Council of the Citv of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb (EoN e-file: resolution\2006�io2006-03 Page 6 of 7 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-04 17 January 2006 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO BELAIR EXCAVATING FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2004-01 AND THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GEM LAKE SEWER INVESTMENT ACCOUNT TO SUPPORT PROJECT COMPLETION. WHEREAS, Bel Air Excavating has completed the work for which it contracted with the City of Gem Lake to the satisfaction of SEH, Inc. as demonstrated in the 29 November 2006 letter from Dave Mitchell to the City acting as Gem Lake's City and Project Engineers; and WHEREAS, the balance required to complete payments for the project is $27,217.14 which agrees with accounting previously approved with the assessment for this project; and WHEREAS, capital required to complete payments for the project has primarily been held in the Capital Projects Fund established for the project which has a current balance of $7,787.42; and WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the City Administrator that the Capital Projects Fund be kept open with funds not to exceed $600.00 for an additional period of sixty (60) days to provide a vehicle to pay previously approved or unanticipated expenses; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby authorize the transfer of nineteen -thousand four -hundred twenty-nine and 72/100ths ($19,429.72) dollars from the Sewer Investment Fund to the Capital Projects Fund; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby authorize final payment in the amount of twenty-seven thousand two -hundred seventeen and fourteen one -hundredths ($27,217.14) dollars; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order the Capital Projects Fund closed on or before the last day of March 2006 for a period not less than two (2) bank statement periods; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order the Capital Projects Fund re -opened with deposits from investment funds as necessary to further fund Capital Projects ordered for 2006; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order all future administrative and miscellaneous operating expenses for Public Improvement Project No. 2004-01 to be paid from the Sewer Fund. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson: and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was rierlareri adnnted hased upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the Cit\ Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. -170;6i 2006' Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb Cog e-file: resolution\2006�io2006-04 Page 7 of 7 n!If,'I , Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com Memo to: Mayor Emeott From: Jack Hoeschler, Planning Commission Chair Date: January 11, 2006 Re: Planning Commission Meeting of January 10, 2006 Facsimile: ( 651) 426 - 6444 The Gem Lake Planning Commission held its January meeting at 7 pm on Tuesday, January 10, 2006 at Tousley Ford. All members were present along with Paul Emeott, as co -zoning administrator. 1. Linden Groth. The first item of business was an informal request by Linden Groth for permission to operate a used car lot in the retail zone. He is a recent renter in the Waldoch building. His proposal met with no real enthusiasm because (i) the use is not allowed in the retail area; (ii) the comprehensive plan discourages more outdoor sales lots, even in the GB area; (iii) it would require a rezoning. We urged him to speak with Bryan Hansen re possible lease of his yard on Scheunemun Road. 2. Hillary Farm. The main item of the evening concerned our effort to work out a new methodology regarding the site review process called for in the Developer's Agreement regarding designs at Hillary Farm. Our proposal has been that Craig Rafferty and Paul Emeott act as our staff in this regard. Craig ran through his slides of the three structures already built showing how he would have reacted to those initial designs and the changes he would have suggested to avoid the "mistakes" that were made on two of the three structures. Now that they are built, he stressed the need for substantially more robust screening by mature trees. He stressed the need for screening from the lake and between Lots 6 and 7 in lieu of a grass only easement area. Bryan Harges responded with drawings showing enhanced plantings on the east side of the model but little or nothing in the area of the scenic easement between Lots 6 and 7 or between the lake and Lot 7. The reaction from various audience members focused on the lack of screening from the lake of Lot 7 and the need for clear 35-foot limits on all facades. The sense of the meeting was that the McNulty team should propose language to reflect rules for the site review procedure in order to make it real. McNulty does not want the Planning Commission to review the results of the procedure — they want the Rafferty/Emeott decisions to be final. The real question is whether the Rafferty/Emeott review will have veto power. Without that, will it amount to much of anything? The sense of the meeting was that we would allow the Site Review process to proceed to see whether it will be better able to resolve the problems with the model and Lot 7 or whether more robust rules need to be enacted. 3. LDB District. The third item discussed was the changes proposed for the LDB zone. Paul Emeott summarized the nature and scope of the changes he had previously proposed and we had previously approved. We asked Bryan Hansen for his comments and reactions. On the whole, he seemed to have no objections and seemed to be favorably impressed with the site review procedure we were proposing for Hillary Farm. The sense of the meeting was that we ratified our prior recommendation that the Council adopt the changes reflected in the attached blacklined copy of the LDB provisions. u Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 01/17/2006 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Hutch Schilling, Council Richard Bosak, Council Tom Rasmussen, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Signatures Approving Claims For Payment Date Of Approval DATE DATE / 171 Q DATE //n DATE 117106 DATE DATE l 171 der, ' DATE GENERAL SEWER CLAIM# PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM $AMOUNT FUND FUND SP 2099 17-.Ian-2006 i METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TOTAL CLAIM _ 1,039.05 _ SP 2099 17-.Ian-2006 Metropolitan Council Current User Charges: January 2006 (58 cents) 0.58 SP 2099 17-.Ian-2006 Metropolitan Council Current User Charges: February 2006 1,038.47 SP 2100 17-.Ian-2006 Gopher State One Call 2Tix @ 1.35/ea + Voice Only @ $3/tix 870, 8.70 G P 6759 20-Dec-2005 Hilary R. Magnuson City Council Mtg Prep: 1 hr x $25/hr 25.00 25.00 GP 6760 17-.Ian-2006 ! CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE TOTAL CLAIM 1,264.33 1 GP 6760 17-Jan-2006 City of White Bear Lake Fire & Paramedic: January 2006 942.33 GP 6760 17-.Ian-2006 City of_White Bear Lake Fire Marshall & Inspections: January 2006 322.00 GP 6761 03-.Ian-2006 Allen O. Zepper Senior Building Official ICC Registration 375.001 375.00 GP 6762 10-Jan-2006 gCINDYSHILTS TOTAL CLAIM _ 480.38 GP 6762 10-.Ian-2006 Cindy Shilts Permit Closure #SC2005-17 105.38 GP 6762 10-.Ian-2006 Cindy Shilts Permit Closure #SC2005-10 187.50' - _- GP 6762 10-Jan-2006 Cindy Shilts Permit Closure #SC2005-20 - 4_ 187.50'. GP 6763 17-Jan-2006 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC. TOTAL CLAIM _ _ 2,046.75 i_ _ GP 6763 17-.Ian-2006 T A. Shifsky & Sons, Inc_. Snow Plowing 12/14,12/15;12/16 _ 1,267.50 , GP 6763 17-Jan-2006 T. A. Shifsky & Sons, Inc. Salt/Sand:12/15.12/16 750.00 GP 6763 17-Jan-2006 T. A. Shifsky & Sons, Inc. _ Sales Tax 29 25 GP 6764 17-Jan-2006 -INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE TOTAL CLAIM 42842 - GP 6764 - 17-Jan-2006 Internal Revenue Service 4th Qtr 2005: Employee SS Payment 17360 GP 6764 17-Jan-2006 Internal Revenue Service 4th Qtr 2005: City SS Payment 173.60 GP 6764 17-.Ian-2006 Internal Revenue Service 4th Qtr 2005: Employee Medicare Payment 1 40 61 GP 6764 17-.Ian-2006 Internal Revenue Service 4th Qtr 2005: City Medicare Payment 40.61 G P 6766 17-.Ian-2006 I DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1NDUS] TOTAL CLAIM 20.15 GP 6766 17-.Ian-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 4th Qtr 2005: Building Permits (Fixed Fees<$1, 0) 1.00 GP 6766 17-.Ian-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 4th Qtr 2005: Building Permits (Per Valuation) 22.15 GP 6766 17-.Ian-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 4th Qtr 2005: Plumbing Permits j 11.50 GP 6766 17-.Ian-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 4th Qtr 2005: Mechanical Permits 1 _ 7 - 2.50_ GP 6766 17-Jan-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 4th Qtr 2005: Electical Permits Il I 8.00 Gil 6766 17-Jan-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 4th Qtr 2005: Permit Retention (25.00). - G1' 6765 17-Jan-2006 Waste Management Curbside Recycling: January 2006 314.001 314.00 - GP 6767 17-Jan-2006 PRESS PUBLICATIONS TOTAL CLAIM 92.25 1 GP 6767 17-.fan-2006 Press Publications LegTrans#340889: Public Notice2005-24 24.60 GP 6767 17-.Ian-2006 Press Publications Le Trans#341937: Public Notice 2005-28 30.75 GP 6767 17-Jan-2006 Press Publications LcgTrans#342732: Public Notice 2005-27 36.90 GP 6768 10-.Ian-2006 Rick Johnson Deer & Beaver, Inc. Removal of Dead Deer: 1 @ $100.00/ea I 100.00 100.00 ' GP 6769 17-.Ian-2006 Meslow & Olson, PLLC I TelConfRe:DamageDuetoDWl/AdminFines 73 50 73.50 G P 6770 17-.Ian-2006 Xcel Energy Street Lighting: December 2005 7034 _ 70.34. - GP 6771 17-Jan-2006 _ _ League of Minnesota_ Cities Insurance Trust Worker's Comp Policy: 1/l/06 to 1/l/07 9600 _ 96.00 GP 6772 17-.Ian-2006 Ramsey County Law Enforcement: January 2006 1 5,765 29 _ 5,765 29 j GI' 6773 17-.Ian-2006 SEH, INC TOTAL CLAIM 1 9,871.69 GP 6773 l7-.Ian-2006 SEH, Inc. City Eng Svcs: Miscellaneous Extra Svc _ 320.00 GP 6773 17-.Ian-2006 SEH, Inc. Hillary Farms Subdivision _ 192.00 _ GP 6773 17-.Ian-2006 I SEH, Inc. PIP 2006-01 Road Feasibility 4,879.00 GP 6773 17-Jan-2006 SEH, Inc. PIP 2006-04 Bus Sew/Wat Feasibility I _ 4,115.12 GP 6773 17-Jan-2006 SEH, Inc. PIP 2006-02 Water Feasibility 365.57 ( GP 6774 17-.Ian-2006 -VOID • -VOID_ 0.0011 _ 0.00' IWA Run: 01/17/2006 at03:12:51 PM Page 1 of File: 06claim01.123 Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 01/17/2006 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Hutch Schilling, Council Richard Bosak, Council Tom Rasmussen, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Signatures Approving ( laimti For 1':n111-11 Date Of Approval DATE DATE / ! DATE DATE DATE / ! DATE GENERAL I SEWER • DATE C L \IMg PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM $ AMOUNT FUND FUND GP 6775 GP 6776 GP 6776 GP 6776 GP 6776 G P 6776 GP 6776 GP 6776 GP 6776 GP 6776 GI' 6776 G P 6776 G P 6776 GP 6776 G P 6776 -� ALL ALL ALL 1j 17-.1an-2006 i Paul R. E_meott 17-Jan-2006 MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC 17-Jan-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-.1an-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC_ 17-.Ian-2006 Magnuson & Assoc_iates. LLC 17-Jan-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-Jan-2006 i Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-.Ian-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-Jan-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-Jan-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 174an-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-.Tan-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-.1an-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-Jan-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 17-.Ian-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC 01/17/20061 JANUARY SUMMARY 8.33% Of Budget Monthly 01/17/2006 YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY 8.33% Of Year Completed 01/17/2006 VERSUS ANNUAL BUDGET 8.33% Of Year Completed Hansen Annex/Detach Dep_osit_i_on 7.5 hrs x $75/t TOTAL CLAIM Tel ephone&FacsimileService: Dec/Jan06 O(iiceSupplies,Copying&Postage: Dec/1an06 Mileage(76 @ $0.445):/Dec/Jan06 InternetAccess-(50%): Dec/1an06 i M isc: MtgsW/W BT&AttyGale GeneralAdministration:Dec/Jan-35.5 hours BillableAdministration:Dec/Jan-13.6 hours SewerAdministration:Dec/Jan-01.8 hours Capital ProjectAdministration:Dec/Jen-22.1 hours ElectionAdministration:Dec/Jan-00.3 hours AsstClerkGeneral:Dec/Jan-23.75 hours AsstClerkSewer:D_ec/Jan-1.75 hours AsstClerk:CapitalProjects-Dec/Jan-02.00 562.50 56250 8,390.81 t- - — 111.70 674.61 33.82 11.95 62.23 2,769.00 1.060.80 140.40 1,723.80 15.00' — 1,543.75: - — 113.75 130.00 TOTAL FOR JANUARY 1 $31,024.16 1 $29,976.41 $1,047.75 % Annual Budget 8.46% 9.46% 2.10% TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE I $31,024.16I $29,976.41 $1,047.75 % Annual Budget 8.46% 9.46% 2.10% Annual Budget $Under/($Over) ($461.99) ($3,576.74); $3,114.75 Annual Budget%Under/-%Over -0.13% -1.13%o 6.24% Run: 01/17/2006 at 03:12:52 PM Page 2 of File: 06claim01.123 GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2005 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT GENERAL C .31 88892.95 M Ty OF GEAKE L FUND H 01/01/2005 START 8376. 137 .J69 County Road "E" East CHECKING K 89,434.05 -347446.71 256078.67 -91368.04 Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 I BANK 73120.25 TRAN TRAN CHECKS TO FOR N DEBTT CREDTT BALANCE BALANCE DATE # DEPOSITS FROM The Brehm G Coup PAYMENT 19-Dec-05 P6737 Council Member Accident 3/l/06 - 22 127.50 93,647.51 93 795.01 Law Enforcement. December 2005 12 (5,186.16 98.461.35 88,608.85 28-Dec-05 738 88,313.75 88.461.25 28-Dec-05 P6739 PRESS PUBLICATIONS TOTAL CLAIM 12 147.60 23-Dec-05 P6740 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE TOTAL CLAIM 12 (1,249.99 97,063.76 97,211.26 P6741 T.A.SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC. TOTAL CLAIM 12 (7,944.00 79,219.76 79,367.26 22-Dec-05 27-Dec-05 P6742 Jim Manteufel 2005 Electrical Permit IngeXtionS (80% of the 12 538.80 78,660.96 78,W8.46 P6743 Xcel Street LiUbdn& November 2005 12 (69.86 78,591.10 78,738.60 23-Dec-05 29-Deo-05 P6744 MESLOW & OLSON PLLC TOTAL CLAIM 12 327.00 79.264.10 79411.60 30-Dec-05 P6745 WASTE MANAGEMENT TOTAL CLAIM 12 (562.60 77,701.50 77,949.00 27-Dec-05 P6746 Avend, LLC 12 Mos. Service Package tltrtt 3/31/0 12 240.00 77,461.50 77 609.00 21-Dec-05 P6747 PAUL R EMEOTT TOTAL CLAIM 12 521.75 76,939.75 77,087.25 19-Dec-05 748 Richard Bosak 4th 05 $200.00.12.4053-2.90mm) 184.70 76.755.05 77,097.25 76,S70.35 77,087.25 19-Dec-05 P6749 Tom Rasmussen 4th '05 (5200.00-12.40ss-2.90mm 184.70 19-Der-05 Pb750 Hutch Schilling4thQr '05 $200.00-12.40s8-2.90mm) 184.70 76.395.65 77,097.25 21-Dec-05 P675I Chuck Watson 4th Qtr'OS S ($200.00-12.40ss-2.90mm 12 184.70 76,200.95 76,902.55 P6752 Sarah Cobian 4th QW05 Salary (S750.00.46.50ss-10.88mm) 12 692.62 75,508.331 76,209.93 21-Dec-05 21-Dec-05 753 Frederic C. Mapuson 4th Qtr'05 S 750.0046.50ss-10.88mm 12 (6n62 74,915.711 75,517.31 22-Dec-05 P6754 SEH, INC TOTAL CLAIM 12 6,592.51 68,223.20 69,924.90 21-Dec-05 P6755 PAUL R. EMEOTT TOTAL CLAIM 12 189.46 68,033.74 69,735.34 19-Dec-05 P6756 LEONARD,O'BRMN,S TOTAL CLAIM (15,612 20 52,421.54 69,735.34 27-Dec-05 P6757 ALLEN O. ZEPPER TOTAL CLAIM 12 730.95 51,690.59 68,004.39 21-Dec-05 P6758 MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM 12 ,844.78 43.845.81 60,159.61 21-Dec-05 OP6759 Hilary R ucon City Council M : lhr x $25/1tr 12 .00 43,820.81 60,134.61 01-Dec-05 1 Cross Woks @mMiq Permit #B2005-10 12 376.85 44.197.66 60,511.46 Ol-Dec-05 2 Flanenpn PropetUM LLC 2005 Fire Inspection Fee 12 55.00 44,252.66 60,566.46 Ol-Dec-05 3 SINGH ENTERSES, LLC PRI TOTAL PAYMENT 12 165.00 44,417.66 60,731.46 - 01-Dec.05 4 Gem Lake Hills 2005 Fire InspWion Fee 12 55.00 44.472.66 60,786.46 1-Dea05 1 RAMSEY COUNTY WIRE TRANSFER TOTAL PAYMENT 12 24,434.80 68,907.46 85,221.26 �13-Dta05 1 State of Minnesota Wile Transfer Traffic Fines: November 2005 12 195.03 69,102.49 95,416.29 20-Dec-05 1 All Poolside Services Plum Permit #P2005-11 12 190.50 69,292.99 85,606.79 20-Dec-05 2 S & B Geo Thermal Mechanical Permit #M2005-12 12 315.50 69,608.49 85,922.29 20-Dec-05 3 Erikson Plum Electrical Permit #E2005-01 12 50.50 69.658.99 85,972.79 20-Dec-05 4 1 KA Electrical Electrical Permit #E2005-02 12 90.50 69,749.491 86,063.29 20-Dec-05 5 Wizard Electric Electrical Permit #E2005-03 12 30.00 69,779.49 86,093.29 20-Dec-05 6 Thnothy Waller Electrical Permit#E2005-04 12 85.00 69.964.49 SC178.29 20-Dec-05 7 Marshall Electric Electrical Permit #E2005-05 12 35.50 69,899.99 $6,213.79 20-Dec-05 8 SinBk Source Electrical Permit #E2005-06 12 50.50 69.950.49 86,264.29 20-Dec-05 9 White Bear Electric Electrical Permit #E2005-07 12 86,294.79 20-Dec-05 10 Gator Electric Electrical Permit #E2005-08 12 90.50 90.50 70 071.49 70,071.49 86,385.29 20-Dec-05 11 Midbrod Electric Electrical Permit #E2005-09 12 40.50 70,111.99 86,425.79 20-Dec.05 12 KA Electrical Electrical Permit #E2005-10 12 80.00 70,191.99 96,505.79 20-Dec-05 13 KA Electrical Electrical Permit #E2005-11 12 90.50 70.292.49 96,596.29 20-Dec-05 14 Kath Fuel Electrical Permit #E2005-12 12 20.50 70.302." 86,6t6.79 20-Dec-05 15 Marshall Electric Electrical Permit #E2005-13 12 70.50 70 73.49 86,697.29 20-Dec-05 16 Sternberg Electric Electrical Permit #E2005-14 12 30.50 70,403.99 96.717.79 20-Dec-05 17 TNT Sales 2005 Fire Inspwtion Fee 12 55.00 70 458.99 96,772.79 23-Dec-05 1 Premier Bank Charge Back Ror Returned Check (Single Souro 12 (50.50 70,408.49 96.722.29 23-Dec-05 2 Premier Bank Charge Back Fee 12 4.00 70,404.49 96,718.29 27-Dec-05 1 State of Minnesota ire'fransfer Traffic Fines: December 2005 12 138.42 70,542.91 96.956.71 30-Dec-05 1 Dan's Affing Auto Clininc 2005 Fire Ins an Fee 12 220.00 70,762.91 87.076.71 30-Dec-05 2 Dan Oskrkainp Sewer Connection Permit #SC2005-17 12 140.50 70,903.41 97.217.21 30-Dec-05 3 Hakam Singb Ord 68 Violation 12 75.00 70.978.41 87.292.21 30-Dec-05 4 CAPRA'S UTILITES TOTAL PAYMENT 12 750.00 71,728AI 98,042.21 30-Dec-05 5 ARNCOIndustries 2005 Fire tnspectiOn Fee 12 165.00 71,893A1 98,207.21 30-Dec-05 6 CITY OF GEM LAKE - SEWER FUND TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT 12 198.75 72,092.16 88,405.96 30-Dec-05 7 S!gh Km LLC Ord 68 Violation 12 75.00 72,167.16 98,480.96 30-Dec-05 8 , Cures Automotive 2005 Fire Inspection Fee 12 55.00 71.00 72 222.16 72,293.16 88,535.96 88,606.96 30-Dec-05 9 MARSHALL ELECTRIC TOTAL PAYMENT 12 534.00 72,827.16 89,140.96 ' Dec-05 10 Lea of Minnesota Cities 2005 /Casual Insurance Dividend 12 1 292.29 73,119.45 89,433.25 Dec-05 1 Premier Bank Interest Paid This Period 12 Run Date: 01/10/2006 at 03:46:36 PM E-File: CheckinglGenFund05.123 Page 1 of 2 GENERAL Farm CHECKING 2005 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT 1 TV OF GEM LAKE GENERAL C -9991.73 88892.95 .A9 County Road "E" East FUND H 01/01/2005_ START 81376.31 Gem Lake, MN 551100.5231 CHECKING K I -347446.71 256078.67-91368.04 89,434.05 BANK 73120.25 TRAN DATE TRAN # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR N DEBIT CREDIT BALANCE BALANCE 30-Dec-05 1 I Premier Bank $.80 Adjustment for Bank's Postin Error (#674 12 0 go 73,120.25 89,434.05 Run Date. 01/10/2006 at 03 46:36 PM E-File: CheckinglGenFund05.123 Page 2 of 2 Premier ��f IN�.► Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAID; r�r FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Page: 1 Account Number: 6008990 Statement Date: 12/30/05 Checks/Items Enclosed: 22 86 E1 � E L LENDER MEMBER FDIC Now offering Health Savings Accounts Contact your branch office for more infromation PREF'E1U= ELITE CITY OF GEM LAKE Acct 6005590 GM24ERAL FUND Beginning Balance 12/01/05 98,981.17 Deposits / Misc Credits 7 29,353.14 " Withdrawals / Misc Debits 21 38,900.26 *.*-Ending Balance 12/31/05 -- 89,434.05 Service Charge .00 !Z/3ll 0- Interest Paid Thru 12/31/05 292.2915`(Y/ �? • �� Interest Paid Year To Date 2,103.13 Annual Percentage Yield Earned 3.15 Number of Days for A. P . Y . E . 31 Average Balance for A.P.Y.E. 110,660.11 l�l Average Collected Balance 110,660 Minimum Balance 87,420 � & & Enclosures 22 M-iscellans,eons Credits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description WnA&K 12/01 651.85 DEPOSIT W , 4fft, 12/01 24,434.80 WIRE IN 12/13 195.03 MN STATE FINANCE/ACH PYMT j t;5,f- -00 GEM LAKE CITY OF 12/20 1,356.50 DEPOSIT 12/27 138.42 MN STATE FINANCE/ACH PYMT GEM LATE CITY OF 12/30 2,284.25 DEPOSIT AI.Ci 12/30 .292.29 Interest Earned ' SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CITY OF GEM TARE Account Number: Statement Date: Miscellaneous Debits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 12/23 4.00 CHARGEBACK FEE Paid Checks Date Check No. 12/06 6732 12/28 6738* 12/28 6739 12/23 6740 /22 6741 _z/27 6742 12/23 6743 Daily Balance Summary Date Balance * indicates skip in check numbers Amount Date Check No. Amount Date 5,186.16 12/29 6744 327.00 12/21 5,186.16 12/30 6745 562.60 12/22 147.60 12/27 6746 240.00 12/21 1,249.99 12/21 6747 521.75 12/27 7,844.00 12/21 6751* 184.70 12/21 558.00 12/21 6752 692.62 12/21 69.86 Date Balance 12/01 12/21 110,282.26 12/22 95,845.75 12/23 94,471.40 i2/27 93,090.87 124,067.`82 12/06 118,881.66 12/13 119,076.69 12/20- 120-i433.19 Date 12/28 12/29 12/30 Page: 2 6005590 12/30/05 Check No. 6753 6754 6755 6757* 6758 6759 Balance 87,747.11 87,420.11 89,434.05 Amount 692.62 6,592.51 189.46 730.95 7,844.78 25.00 TREASURER'S REPORT SEWER FUND CHECKING 2005 CITY OF GEM LAKE rY OF GEM LAKE SEWER C ,369 County Road "E" East FUND H 05 Jan START 134,315.04 -158827.19 68425.61 227252.80 Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 CHECKING K 44006.71 42968.82 I BANK TRAN I TRAN CHECKS TO DATE # DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR N DEBIT CREDIT BALANCE BALANCE 19-Dec05 SP2096 Metropolitan Council Ctiurent User Char es: January 2006 -1037.89 40713.95 41751.84 30-Dec-05 I SP2097 SP2098 Gopher State One -Call CITY OF GEM LAKE 1 oRe Tix $1.35+voiceonl $3/ea GENERALFUNDREIMBURSEMENT 12 12 43.50 -198.75 40670,45 40471.70 41708,34 41509.59 30-Dec05 01-Dec-05 1 Peter Oswald 3rd Qtr 2005 Sewer Fees/Residential 12 32.50 40504.20 41542.09 01-Dec-05 2 Pod's Tire & Wheel 3rd Qtr 2005 Sewer Fees/Commercial 12 130.00 40634.20 41672.09 20-Dec-05 1 David hanson 3rd Qtr 2005 Sewer Fees/Residential 12 32.50 40666.70 41704.59 20-Dec-05 2 Mary Burke Cardenas 3rd Qtr 2005 Sewer Fees/Residential 12 32.50 40699.20 41737.09 30-Dec-05 1 DAN OSTERKAMP DAMS AILING AUT TOTAL PAYMENT 12 2100.00 42799.20 43837.09 30-Dec-05 2 ARNCO INDUSTRIES, INC. TOTAL PAYMENT 12 162.50 42961.70 4 59 30-Dec-05 1 Premier Bank Interest Paid This Period 12 7.12 42968.82 44006.006.71 R Run Date: 01/10/2006 at 01:15:00 PM E-File: CheckingMewerFund05.123 Page 1 Premier IEI:C=R ,-■� Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. PAEN7E3ER FDIC Page: 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE Account Number: 6005582 SEWER FUND Statement Date: 12/30/05 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LMA E MN 55110-5231 Checks/Items Enclosed: 5 86 NOW OFFERING Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture NON PROFIT PREMIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE Acct 6005582 SEWER FUND Beginning Balance 12/01/05 41,751.84 Deposits / M_isc Credits 4 2,497.12 242.25 Withdrawals / Mise Debits 2 12/31/05 44,006.** ** Ending Balance .00 Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 12/31/05 7.12 Interest Paid Year To Date 121.98 Annual Percentage Yield Earned .20 Number of Days for A.P.Y.E. 31 41,902.90 Average Balance for A.P.Y.E. Average Collected Balance 41,903 41,914 Minimum Balance 5 Enclosures Miscellaneous Credits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 12/01 162.50 DEPOSIT 12/20 65.00 DEPOSIT 12/30 2,262.50 DEPOSIT Interest Earned 12/30 7.12 Paid Checks * indicates skip in check numbers Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount 12/30 2097 43:50 12/30 2099 _ 198.75 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Page: 2 CITY OF GEM LAKE Account Number: 6005582 Statement Date: 12/30/05 Daily Balance Summary Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND CHECKING 2005 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT OF GEM LAKE 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 _ TRAN HEC CHECKS TO DATE # DEPOSITS FROM r503O 2004/2005 BONDS CAPITAL PROJECT FUND CHECKING #61038" C H K I N PREMIER BANK WBL 03-Nov-04 START 0.00 9145.92 BANK BALANCE -727574.43 735857.85 545857.85 PAYMENT FOR DEBIT CREDIT 8283.42 BALANCE 28-Oct-05 SE Inc. Scheuneman Road Sewer: Plans (Inv 137380) 10 (2,178.90 39,004.59 39,004.59 22-Nov-05 5031 1 SEH, Inc. Scheuneman Road Sewer: Plans (Inv 137963) 11 (2,324.80 36,679.79 36,679.79 09-Dec-05 5032 Belair Builders, Inc,dba Belair Excavating Application For Payment No. 5 Per SEH 12 (27,339.87 9,339.92 9,339.92 22-Dec-05 5033 SEH, Inc. North Scheaneman Road Sewer: Plans (Inv1397 12 (194.00 9,145.92 9.145.92 19-Dec OS 5034 Leooard,OBriea,S SchRdSewerIssue/AssessIssues(Invl21444) 312.50 8,833.42 9,145.92 19-Dec-05 5035 Leonard,OBrien,Spencer,Gale&Sayre SchRdSewerlssue/Assesslssues(Inv121441) (550.00 8,283.421 9.145.92 Run Date: 01/10/2006 at 01:30:03 PM E-File: CompleteChecking3Project.123 Page 1 Premier Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. /Cl"ANC V LENCER MEMBER FDIC CITY OF GEM LAKE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Page: 1 Account Number: 6103844 Statement Date: 12/30/05 Checks/Items Enclosed: 2 86 NOW OFFERING Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture NON PROFIT PREMIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE Acct 6103844 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Beginning Balance 12/01/05 36,679.79 Deposits / Misc Credits 0 .00 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 2 27,533.87 ** Ending Balance 12/31/05 9,145.92 ** Service Charge .00 Average Balance 16,333 Average Collected Balance 16,333 minimum Balance ante 91145 Enclosures 2 Paid Checks Date Check No. 12/09 5032 Daily Balance Summary Date Balance 12/09 9,339.92 * indicates skip in check numbers Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. 27,339.87 12/22 5033 194.00 Date Balance 12/22 9,145.92 Date Balance Amount SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DEBIT FUND CHECKING 2005 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT )rY OF GEM LAKE .369 County Road "E" East Gem lake, MN 55110-5231 2005 BONDS DEBT SERVICE CHECKING #6103780 PAYMENT FOR C H K I N 01-Jan-05 START 0.00 -16178.61 63510.00 26868.85 74200.24 DEBIT CREDIT BALANCE 65365.24 BANK BALANCE TRAM DATE TRAN # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM 20-Dec-05 1 Larry Weber (4046 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 11602.81 11602.81 20-Dec-05 I Stephan & Amy Turnbull (4042 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 1 875.00 12477.81 12477.81 20-Dec-05 1 Ronald Peterson (4076 Scb Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 13352.81 13352.81 20-Dec-05 1 Ronald Peterson (4076 Sch Rd Sewer Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 7960.00 21312.81 21312.81 20-Dec-05 1 David R- Hanson (3812 Scb Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 22187.81 22187.81 20-Dec-05 1 Knot S erseth 3836 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 23062.81 23062.81 20-Dec-05 1 Gertrude Hannah 3825 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.0 223937.81 23937.81 20-Dec-05 I Charles Rudisel 3963 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 24812.81 24812.81 09-Dec-05 1 PremierBankChaz a De sitTicketPrintin-DeluxeCheck 12 -37.57 24775.24 2477524 20-Dec-05 1 Gerhardt & Loma Meyer (3920 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 25650.24 25650.24 20-Dec-05 1 Dr. R-T. Donahue 3791 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 26525.241 26525.24 20-Dec-05 1 Gerhardt & Loma Mayer 3920 Sch Rd) Sewer Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 7960.00 34485.241 34485.24 20-Dec-05 1 Joseph& Janet Franz Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 35360.24 35360.24 20-Dec-05 I Edina Reel Title OPhelen 3815 Sch Rd Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 36235.24 36235.24 20-Dec-05 1 Hazel Marie White (4106 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 37110.24 37110.24 20-Dec-05 1 Martin & Ceth McW OM Sch Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 37985.24 37985.24 20-Dec-05 1 Hazel Marie White (4106 Sch Rd) Sewer Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 7960.00 45945.24 45945.24 20-Dec-05 1 Martin & Cathy Meyer (3926 Sch Rd) Sewer Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 7960.00 53905.24 53905.24 20-Dec-05 1 Maia & Mark Hendrickson (4038 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 54780.24 54780.24 20-Dec-05 1 William & Helen Kahl (4044 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 55655.24 55655.24 20-Dec-05 1 Ray & Gloria Tessier (4085 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 56530.24 56530.24 20-Dec-05 I Old Republic (Larkin: 10 Hillary Farm Lane Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 875.00 57405.24 57405.24 20-Dec-05 1 Old Republic (Larkin: 10 Hillary Farm Lana Sewer Assessment 2004-01 Payment 12 7960.00 65365.24 65365.24 05-Jan-06 1 Vernon Grundhofer (4077 Sch Rd) Road Assessment 2004-01 Payment (Cash) 875.001 66240.24 65365.24 05-Jan-06 1 Vernon Grundhofer 4077 Sch Rd) Sewer Assessment 2004-01 Payment (Cash) 7960.00 1 74200.24 65365.24 Run Date: 01/10/2006 at 11:40:10 AM E-File: Checking4Bonds05.123 Page 1 Premier OWNS Bank Minnesota Ozoned. Minnesota Operated. MEMBER FDIC Page: 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE 6103780 SERVICE 2004 DEBIT FUND Account Number: 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E Statement Date: 12/30/05 GEM LARK MN 55110-5231 Checks/Items Enclosed: 3 86 NOW OFFERING Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture NON PROFIT PPY14IER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE Acct 6103780 SERVICE 2004 DEBIT FUND Beginning Balance 12/01/05 10,727.81 Deposits / Misc Credits 3 54,675.00 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 1 37.57 ** Ending Balance 12/31/05 65,365.24 ** Service Charge .00 Average Balance 31,864 Average Collected Balance 30,016 10,690 Minimum Balance 3 Enclosures Miscellaneous Credits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 12/20 2,625.00 DEPOSIT 12/20 8;835.00 DEPOSIT 12/20 43,215.00 DEPOSIT Miscellaneous Debits Date Deposits 12/09 Withdrawals Activity Description 37.57 DELUXE BUS SYS./BUS PRODS FREDRIC MAGNUSON SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RAMSEY COUNTY ESTIMATED Al1r FKCT VALUE-roi'ALE. SORTED BY PR0PERri' T)'P 2005 2003 pay 2004 E.�'iI11ATED 2004 pay 2005 _�-.: 3-..�30 220 .2O'N$ 3 2aO4 Groy4ll MARKET VALUE ADDED lmr;ov=ont RESIDENTIAL 12,73 ,523. 0 105.548.900 1=:,333,363,:i-3 1 00 1,498,788,000 AGRICULTURAL HIGH VALUE 131.600 131,600 APARTMENT 335,75i,7C 52,744.000 2,CO2sc' :; :07 374,212.700 321.438,700 COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL 2c232'_ 21,475,3001 VIZ350,100 0MAL I ':K,7K:20 V V ✓Ya w✓v RESIDENTIAL 1CC,2=:-'. _ 141,226,500 1,572,092,500 1,430,866,0001 AGRICULTURAL HIGH VALUE -3, 7.3C0 240,000 P9,o; : ,&^_D 3,046,000 2,806,000� APARTMENT i'3,35'.,=:0 31.135.700 CO 200,578,500 169,442,800N COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL 69,681 ,900 i�-".•,27�,SCO 74,5S2,300 'OTAL _ a__.: TO - an ._. z_ v vr.e.v c uu _ I RESIDENTIAL 27,5:-'.,%7 r:J: 246,775.400 30,3 1? ,' 3,176,429,400 2,929,654.000� AGRICULTURAL HIGH VALUE rC,339,8X 240,000 32. _ , : _ 3,177,600 2.937,600� I APARTMENT 2, H,533,10' 83,879.700 3,5 -.,3c- , 574.791,200 490,911,500 COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL = 91,157.200 - 286.624,600 added Improvement (AI) is new value resulting from new construction, remodeling and additions to existing improvements. (2003 p 2004 Values Taken From the 2003 Spring Mini Abstract run 3-05-03, 2004 p 2005 Values Taken From Preliminary ACS Reports run 3)4-04 (Reported Values Excludes Personal Property, Stale Assessed Utility 8 Railroad Property) (Includes Added Improvement for 2003 p 2004 and 2004 p 2005) (Includes Vacant Land for all Property Types) (All 2004 pay 2005 Values are subject to review and change until conclusion of the Board of Appeal and Equalization) March 8, 2004 Page 4 2004 Board Report finai.XLS totals 03 vs. 04 printed 3/12/20D4 1 SUNRAY-BATFLECREEK 1 4,699 153,900 169,400 10.07% GREATER EAST SIDE 2 6,711 141,800 156,200 10.16% WEST SIDE 3 3,606 142,100 156,900 10.42% DAYTON'S BLUFF 4 3,939 129,100 147,100 13.94% PAYNE-PHALEN 5 6,801 136,100 152,300 11.90% NORTH END 6 5,524 137,600 151,100 9.81% THOMAS DALE 7 2,987 117,300 134,800 14.92% SUMMIT -UNIVERSITY 8 3,579 170,900 191,500 12.05% WEST SEVENTH 9 2,963 144,450 162,200 12.29% Como 10 3,584 181,350 198,200 9.29% HAMLINE-MIDWAY 11 3,273 155,400 169,000 8.75% ST ANTHONY PARK 12 1,323 250,400 294,200 17.49% MERRIAM 13 3,730 232,550 258,000 10.94% MACALESTER-GROVELAND 14 6,004 229,300 248,300 8.29% HIGHLAND 15 5,956 222,950 245,650 10,18% SUMMIT HILL 16 1,699 328,800 351,300 6.84'Yo DOWNTOWN 17 1,262 106,500 119,500 12.21% AIRPORT 20 0 ARDEN HELLS 25 2,341 228,600 255,800 11.90% BLAINE 29 0 FAIRGROUNDS 30 0 FALCONEEIGHTS 33 1,262 224,350 245,800 9.56% GEM LAKE 37 141 244,700 246,300 0.65% LAUDERDALE 47 625 160,300 165,700 3.37% LITTLE CANADA 53 2,497 187,850 207,100 10-25% MAPLEWOOD 57 10,292 180,900 197,700 9.29% MOUNDS VIEW 59 3,456 161,400 179,150 11.00% NEW BRIGHTON 63 5,809 191,400 209,700 9.56% NORTH OAKS 67 1,412 506,500 563,650 11.28% NORTH ST. PAUL 69 3,419 170,300 180,700 6.11% ROSEVILLE 79 10,352 186,100 206,500 10.96% ST. ANTHONY 81 475 161,700 173,400 7.24% SHOREVIEW 83 9,095 208,000 226,000 8.65% SPRING LAKE PARK 85 54 163,200 174,300 6.80% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 4,216 186,100 205,500 10.42% WHITE BEAR LAKE 93 7,274 177,400 191,900 8.17% WHITE BEAR TWP 97 4,105 207,500 225,400 8.63% CITY OF ST PAUL 67,640 154,700 171,000 10.54% SUBURBS 66,825 187,800 205,100 9.21% COUNTYWIDE 134,465 173,600 190,000 9.45% 's, ;on ji, a -,.mt p'-a.p- rv. alic" va -a: Z! P, I U cj 3 S s n a, i 0 'L, con"'os and, !"Rssiden-L,Ja� pc, j lllc� c: mic -:�s L, 2 3/5/2004 9:36 Page 5 1 -7 7 Mr, c7 s s a E3 s cn* 1�ou Lo e:s % SUNRAY-BATTLECR. 1 4,254 154,000 169,900 10.32% 181,871 GREATER EAST SIDE 2 6,405 141,300 155,600 10.12% 155,480 WEST SIDE 3 2,966 140,900 154,700 9.79% 159,315 DAYTONS BLUFF 4 3,177 128,800 144,400 12.11% 146,164 PAYNE-PHALEN 5 5,620 136,000 149,800 10.15% 152,755 NORTH END 6 4,704 139,900 150,800 7.79% 152,921 THOMAS DALE 7 2,088 116,700 131,250 12.47% 131,939 SUMMrr-UNIVERSITY 8 1,829 160,850 179,500 11.59% 243,949 WEST SEVENTH 9 2,328 142,600 160,000 12.20% 161,599 Como 10 3,346 181,800 198,400 9.13% 205,008 HAMLINE-MIDWAY 11 2,851 153,900 166,900 8.45% 169,826 ST ANTHONY PARK 12 1,038 259,400 306,200 18.04% 312,956 MERRIAM 13 3,143 228,400 252,800 10.68% 290,198 MACALESTER-GROV 14 5,380 230,300 248,700 7.99% 279,979 HIGHLAND 15 5,468 226,500 249,350 10.09% 289,642 SUMlffr HILL 16 1,069 371,800 388,200 4.41% 454,690 DOWNTOWN 17 22 266,150 301,600 13.32% 358,618 AIRPORT 20 0 ARDENHILLS 25 1,987 244,400 271,800 11.21% 296,009 BLAINE 29 0 FAIRGROUNDS 30 0 FALCON HEIGHTS 33 1,118 230,250 251,450 9.21% 262,669 GE-1� LAKE 37 137 239,500 246,000 2.71% 3332,o-06 LAUDERDALE 47 460 162,550 169,500 4.28% 174,728 LITTLE CANADA 53 1,596 205,900 225,800 9.66% 251,737 MAPLEWOOD 57 8,716 185,900 204,500 10.01% 224,782 MOUNDS VIEW 59 2,751 167,400 185,600 10.87% 191,853 NEW BRIGHTON 63 4,878 197,100 215,700 9.44% 239,367 NORTH OAKS 67 1,357 505,700 565,200 11.77% 646,361 NORTH ST. PAUL 69 3,277 170,300 180,500 5.990/0 191,937 ROSEVILLE 79 8,285 192,500 214,500 11.43% 236,057 ST. ANTHONY 81 153 212,100 211,000 -0.52% 256,435 SHOREVIEW 83 6,306 225,500 247,100 9.58% 285,614 SPRING LAKE PARK 85 33 171,400 185,400 8.17% 187,512 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 2,854 203,800 220,200 8.05% 259,746 VlHFrE BEAR LAKE 93 6,140 178,700 193,200 8.11% 216,586 WHITE BEAR TWP 97 3,263 208,650 228,900 9.71% 263,842 CITY OF ST PAUL 990 55,688 155,100 170,200 9.74% 204,231 SUBURBS 991 53,311 195,800 213,700 9.14% 249,566 TOTAL 992 108,999 178,200 194,900 9.37% 226,404 avJch.. 20 c C-m "p, i -. r, rop ,,mpc z and vFr:7 31512004 0.00 6 2004 Assessed Market Value of Townhomes in Ramsey County* Arrayed By District and City 2003 p 2004 2004 p 2005 2004 Parcel Median Median Average District / Jurisdiction Count Value Value % Change Value SUNRAY -BATTLE CREEK 1 135 127,100 143,700 13.1% 145,632 GREATER EAST SIDE 2 47 135,400 140,100 3.5% 147,809 WEST SIDE 3 60 102,200 113,700 11.3% 131,023 DAYTONS BLUFF 4 38 179AM 197,100 10.5% 187,884 PAYNE PHALEN 5 19 107,200 120,200 12.1% 121,021 NORTHEND 6 115 180,200 180,200 0.00/0 173,135 THOMAS DALE 7 4 123,600 133,750 8.2% 133,100 SUA4Mrr UNIIVERSITY 8 163 150,800 165,700 9.9% 230,020 WEST SEVENTH 9 40 119,400 191,200 60.1% 176,898 COMO 10 8 115,500 116,500 0.90/0 120,500 ST ANTHONY 12 71 130,000 139,400 7.2% 144,756 MERRL4,M 13 4 125,500 117,000 -6.8% 117,000 MACALESTER GROVELAND 14 25 253,600 253,600 0.0% 231,668 HIGHLAND 15 39 188,200 209,900 11.5% 208,392 SUMMIT HILL 16 36 255,900 262,600 2.6% 299,853 DOWNTOWN 17 9 350,800 369,200 5.21% 382,744 ARDEN HILLS 25 348 161,500 172,650 6.9% 182,456 FALCON HEIGHTS 33 15 451,100 451,000 0.00/0 366,207 LAUDERDALE 47 42 199,400 230,300 15.5% 230,262 LITTLE CANADA 53 264 210,500 223,550 6.2% 213,695 MAPLEWOOD 57 722 150,800 169,650 12.5% 182,930 MOUNDS VIEW 59 6 144,050 176,150 22.3% 163,783 NEW BRIGHTON 63 423 163,600 181,700 11.1% 193,318 NORTH OAKS 67 34 526,600 578,250 9.8% 577,306 NORTH ST. PAUL 69 88 149,950 173,400 15.6% 172,956 ROSEVILLE 79 563 182,000 206,800 13.6% 225,987 ST. ANTHONY 81 147 160,900 175,000 8.8% 174,897 SHOREVIEW 83 1,805 158,700 173,200 9.1% 195,091 SPRINGLAKE 85 21 159,300 165,900 4.1% 168,667 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 653 149,100 161,400 8.2% 202,386 WHITE BEAR LAKE 93 590 172,800 197,000 14.0% 215,263 WHITE BEAR TWP 97 518 220,250 248,900 13.0% 254,283 CITY OF ST PAUL 813 132,600 151,200 14.0% 183,011 SUBURBS 6,239 164,800 183,500 11.3% 205,843 COUNTYWIDE 7,052 162,200 180,300 11.2% 203,211 'Excludes exempt prope-, lease public property, added improvement in the 2004 values, and vacant `J 3/5/2004 9:36 7 2004 Assessed Market Value of Condominiums in Ramsey 2003 p 2004 2004 p 2005 2004 p 2005 Median Median Average Jurisdiction Count Vacua Value % Change Valur- _ SUNRAY -BATTLE 1 108 117,000 119,800 2.4510 121,908 WEST SIDE 3 101 96,600 117,500 21.6% 117,070 DAYTONS BLUFF 4 103 93,000 119,600 28.6% 115,922 PAYNE-PHALEN 5 108 61,000 79,000 29.5% 87,810 NORTH END 6 161 113,800 125,100 9.9% 123,295 THOMAS DALE 7 241 45,000 50,000 11.1% 70,441 SUMMIT -UNIVERSITY 8 1,003 159,650 186,200 16.6% 189AN WEST SEVENTH 9 214 137,200 153,350 11.80/0 161,748 COMO 10 124 112,800 132,900 17.80% 130,838 HAML1NF-MIDWAY 11 12 88,700 133,350 50.3% 132,108 ST ANTHONY 12 49 136,000 140,900 3.6% 148,576 MERRIAM 13 79 120,000 136,700 13.9% 157,759 MACALESTER-GROVE 14 292 96,700 108,800 12.5% 112,847 HIGHLAND 15 261 135,000 156,700 16.1% 177,296 SUMMIT HILL 16 381 193,850 206,500 6.5% 226,037 DOWNTOWN 17 1,228 105,600 118,900 12.6% 146,184 FALCON HEIGHTS 33 117 176,300 178,000 1.0% 176,342 LAUDERDALE 47 104 124,000 142,200 14.7% 130,113 LITTLE CANADA 53 612 105,300 118,000 12.1 % 112,659 MAPLEWOOD 57 756 125,400 136,000 8.5% 137,310 MOUNDS VIEW 59 644 93,600 111,800 33.7% 117,055 NEW BRIGHTON 63 416 145,500 166,900 14.7% 162,151 NORTH OAKS 67 19 325,600 374,500 15.0% 370,463 ROSEVILLE 79 1,413 109,500 123,200 12.5% 129,253 ST. ANTHONY 81 164 105,400 112,800 7.0% 121,039 SHOREVIEW 83 956 130,000 134,700 3.6% 142,631 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 692 124,600 131,500 5.5% 136,348 WHITEBEARLAKE 93 456 146,450 158,100 8.0% 165,892 WHITE BEAR TWP 97 307 133,600 136,900 2.5% 147,293 CITY OF ST PAUL 4,465 119,400 137,200 149% 154,607 SUBURBS 6,656 124,300 132,600 6.7% 136,847 COUNTYWIDE 11,121 123,100 133,200 8.2% 143,977 E *Excludes exempt or-.; rty, lease public properly, added improvement in `�J the 2004 values. 3/5/200410.44 Residential Sales Between 10/1/02 and 9130/03 By District Bale median Average Minimum Maximum District I jurisdiction Count Valul Value- Stdev. Value Value SUNRAY BATTLE 1 266 171,950 177,343 38,595 89,600 450,000 GREATER EAST 2 367 159,700 158,826 22,201 86,600 237,000 WEST SIDE 3 177 156,457 158,060 31,945 75,000 285,000 DAYTOMS BLUFF 4 228 143,900 142,809 29,296 40,000 305,000 PAYNE PHALEN 5 351 153,000 154,209 34,019 68,000 285,000 NORTH END 6 327 150,900 149,754 34,041 49,000 359,900 THOMAS DALE 7 148 131,400 129,924 27,362 62,000 199,900 SUMMIT UNIVERSITY 8 87 204,265 244,872 127,368 95,000 650,000 WEST SEVENTH 9 101 156,000 155,060 32,313 73,900 280,000 COMO 10 200 196,451 205,499 42,291 124,000 400,000 HAMLINE-MIDWAY 11 214 166,750 167,290 29,464 100,000 310,000 STANTHONY 12 32 288,900 313,979 104,107 141,500 530,000 MERRIAM 13 158 257,325 297,168 151,784 110,000 955,000 MACALESTER-GROVELAND 14 307 241,000 276,489 129,514 107,850 1,200,000 HIGHLAND 15 255 244,000 272,884 121,812 88,900 1,200,000 SUMMIT HILL 16 3 759,900 695,800 232,961 437,500 890,000 ARDEN HILLS 25 78 263,950 295,250 121,661 142,000 759,900 FALCONHEIGHTS 33 49 240,000 250,035 49,715 169,000 425,000 G 37 2 255,950 255,950 48,013 222,000 289,900 LAUDERDALE 47 18 162,450 162,066 31,391 95,000 211,000 LITTLE CANADA 53 41 219,000 243,985 104,626 154,500 690,000 MAPLEWOOD 57 373 209,900 224,318 66,596 66,900 540,000 MOUNDS VIEW 59 114 187,250 193,939 40,767 116,500 360,000 NEW BRIGHTON 63 207 212,400 236,950 86,293 129,000 650,000 NORTH OAKS 67 60 590,000 664,748 292,168 322,500 1,650,000 NORTH ST. PAUL 69 152 179,150 189,835 77,167 97,000 935,500 ROSEVILLE 79 338 215,700 230,379 57,632 130,000 537,500 ST. ANTHONY 81 3 235,900 317,467 157,481 217,500 499,000 SHOREVIEW 83 287 241,000 269,068 131,646 129,300 1,760,000 SPRING LAKE 85 1 144,000 144,000 144,000 144,000 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 146 220,000 252,639 94,841 110,000 760,000 WHILE BEAR 93 314 198,000 218,053 99,589 108,777 1,525,000 WHITE BEAR _ _ _ 97 161 231,000 251,389 93,795 120,000 865,000 CITY OF ST PAUL 3,221 169,500 191,166 91,754 40,000 1,200,000 SUBURBS 2,344 215,000 245,013 122,761 66,900 1,760,000 COUNTYWIDE 5,565 186,000 213,941 109,199 40,000 1,760,000 318/200416:27 8-A .v.....`:E .:�G_•I4vL-.t....-ti.:J t ?SC:i� s is �r ,.?wLr a:: - �i sence °/c-fe:,c SUNRAY-BATTLECR 1 4,699 169,400 144,600 -24,800 -14.64% GREATER EAST SIDE 2 6,711 156,200 128,300 -27,900 -17.86% WEST SIDE 3 3,606 156,900 117,400 -39,500 -25.18 % DAYTON'S BLUFF 4 3,939 147,100 102,900 -44,200 -30.05% PAYNE-PHALEN 5 6,801 152,300 113,200 -39,100 -25.67% NORTHEND 6 5,524 151,100 110,600 -40,500 -26.80% THOMAS DALE 7 2,987 134,800 92,300 -42,500 -31.53% SUMMIT-UNIVERSIT 8 3,579 191,500 131,500 -60,000 -31.33% WEST SEVENTH 9 2,963 162,200 115,200 -47,000 -28.98% COMO 10 3,584 198,200 164,950 -33,250 -16.78% HAMLINE-MIDWAY 11 3,273 169,000 126,000 -43,000 -25.44% ST ANTHONY PARK 12 1,323 294,200 223,700 -70,500 -23.96% MERRIAM 13 3,730 258,000 190,050 -67,950 -26.34% MACALESTER GROV 14 6,004 248,300 201,100 -47,200 -19.01% HIGHLAND 15 5,956 245,650 209,200 -36,450 -14.84% SUMNIITHHJ 16 1,699 351,300 261,100 -90,200 -25.68% DOWNTOWN 17 1,262 119,500 75,050 -44,450 -37.20% AIRPORT 20 0 ARDEN HILLS 25 2,341 255,800 238,400 -17,400 -6.80% BLAINE 29 0 FAIRGROUNDS 30 0 FALCONHEIGHTS 33 1,262 245,800 219,700 26,100 -10.62% GEM LAKE 37 141 246,300 212,800 -33,500 -13.60% LAUDERDALE 47 625 165,700 145,800 -19,900 -12.01% LITTLE CANADA 53 2,497 207,100 189,200 -17,900 -8.64% MAPLEWOOD 57 10,292 197,700 180,700 -17,000 -8.60% MOUNDS VIEW 59 3,456 179,150 165,600 -13,550 -7.56% NEW BRIGHTON 63 5,809 209,700 198,900 -10,800 -5.15% NORTH OAKS 67 1,412 563,650 519,550 -44,100 -7.82% NORTH ST. PAUL 69 3,419 180,700 164,500 -16,200 -8.97% ROSEVILLE 79 10,352 206,500 189,800 -16,700 -8.09% ST. ANTHONY 81 475 173,400 150,700 -22,700 -13.09% SHOREVIEW 83 9,095 226,000 211,100 -14,900 -6.59% SPRING LAKE PARK 85 54 174,300 165,900 -8,400 -4.82% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 4,216 205,500 193,900 -11,600 -5.64% WHITE BEAR LAKE 93 7,274 191,900 179,100 -12,800 -6.67% WHITE BEAR TOWN 97 4,105 225,400 211,800 -13,600 -6.03% CITY OF ST PAUL 67,640 171,000 134,100 36,900 -21.58% SUBURBS 66,825 205,100 190,300 -14,900 -7.22% COUNTYWIDE 134,465 190,000 165,500 24,500-12.89% (=7.CiC--'s.., cC.^;. d i .p i-overnant- Hn 2�J' a _.1L•3S, :ease i?��iJIiC � P6�iei 1_ , C-:iC-ii¢?Tc �]1"G �:Gi'ia/; .� C' vacaml., 1 4V CSL =1Et:Gi--propoi El,' inciudeS simgla-i-amlly, GE7piexas: -_i if3lc-es, conues c..s tevvi212o"rie5. .`/J■ 3/5/2004 9:36 �7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 o e o o cc o y CO CD N CO N N r U) CO co) O 't m M O N O I,:N Ln O O a ti O r ` O CC t; W W r W In M CO f0 rN Co T pp L n m ro IT O O O O O O O O O_ O to O O O N co C9 O M -O '�I--� U u = CD M O O C) [ CD O O a O h O � CO O M CO � CD, O) coO M � O O CO 0) r LO M t9 W Go � r � an M M CO LC! O) r r rz 0 r C7 " W cD Q! N O cV O O r M r M W W O Ln M I- W 1` M C7 LO r r r ti CO N O W r Cr) O N M co ti 1- W M r C3 �u co O N LO O r CO CD CO Ch CO W 00 -e t` C.)N CO O � Cl � O et N CO U-) is CD N to W Cn �`r N M dv rEfT C4 CM \A G!i O M M d N s > O O O O O O O C. O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O> v C O 00 M O O O O O CO O "'t "t CD O CD Lt) r Cc!� Clt r O CD 1` 7 O O r Cl M r IT r M W CDM M qr - -' W W .0 ® m N N to V 00 t` C-) I` N n CO ti Ln CD CD m CD ti O CD m G L% N co Ln O r CO N t0 Cn r M N m M � LQ CD M O M ac to W N O) Co F% C§ ® Cy 1 0 CO 't O 0) in N W I� 000 CO m 1, CD O N r r CO ti I- to O CO r r W L.- co a) O C& W- 4. CO N r LO N 0)CO r r O) C, O W O2 C c1 O CV r N N r r r N= Z) 47 O {� O Q3 CV Cl O Cl O O O O O O O co O O O N O CO O M M ad M Cl O CO O ti O It O CA W CO O LO r O) N Nt O O O CD O L() LO W O I N r r LO CO W In W 6) Ln Q) cu m o I -- Cot-- M I-- CO O I-- d' N O N N M W) 0; C; C;l0 + O 0)CO � t` 'd LO CO N r W M r O) O) O I` M N � O) goCCI RI O) C _ Ch N r O I.- 1, r (D CD CO ►� co ti r O) -,t W O I` M 1- CO O CO CO Co r O! O H Go m CD � L- N CO W ti CO CD O L- CO CO M 00 CD M r W O) CO CD O LO r C» r In M N r N N M 1mD W O d H O �c Cry o CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 o o L o e C o 0 0 C o 0 0 C 0 Q 1�i7 CO CV I• U) f` N N M LO LO N O CO CD M W m $ M cr! O q U) cc cl (h M N c! CO V t? Lp h N O Ll7 N U- in ^v: G] y �^ O >; ID O C Co m O m `7 r N W 1-�- r CO r C) CO W O cm o a Co ® m w O 0) co Cl) CD CD Co O C,O O O Cl C) Cl C) 0, OO ID40 C, O CD, O C)O O CD O CDw C) ai m V O Q1 CD r O 1' C) Cal O LO C) C? C) LC� O O O O C, O) Cl CO O O O r' O 'I r N In 'r al Eck ll� O N cm s W O � r I.- N - W er n M W O N CD CA r C`) W V) CD t y @1 ` w Cis H CB O CD c0t'-O st C) min C,It IID ti ti W M M I M In 7 C7 O Ln M N M N O CD, CA Ccl C7 .-- Ln W :- CM l8 M CD O co O) O M M A CO C7 r C] CD co inLLO cli m a + CD M N I.- N C', CD t» r CD O) M C*4 % W C%j CO O C'4 CAD tvi N i co co d a c r e W O O O O O O O C. O O Cl O O O O co O O O �` 8 ® 8® o LOn O N C07 Lp IOO O COD_ C pO ID ti O Or 13 W O 'Q O t0 CO O V m= O co N O I- Cl co et I` O) I` O N LO L- m N LO r O) (D N O Cl O) co O cc et MCC) I-- a m 0) co c•i to CDi @ y a� .� N O a0 O N r W CO N CD '7 M O C? Ip V N CM tt) E ®) or 1 C3 cm W r .;t 7 N O N O) N CD CO M CO w CO w � co CO CD r ti 1� co CD co CO 'r C' CV cfi a Cl) � Q Ln M U, N CD N O M ¢t I-- toco m W co M co N m -O a g7 m is Cy r r O OF CIS ctlO ba r CV W N cc m ®O Cl O O O O O O C. O O O Cl O O O CD O O O O j y ® C9 O CO Cl CO CD Ln Cl 00 CD CO C) O CD CD C) LO O N Co r (D r- O CO O Lf) CD C)r O CD O LO O co C7 � C)m CN_ ts @ cu m 1 d) O O N_ N st r M CD O CO O CD mM M 'z A @ N CD � Cn M O W 1� Cl) In CO CD 'ct N 10 CI O CO r N 00 O CO CA CO 1• LO O I-- Cl! O O N O L1 Lti ti I- c W a. M CD 7 CO C) N I- N- W CA CD O) IM I--r M- W to b ® Iq (D 0)lCl O O) N CO * r CO O � M O) h n CD CD C) ,p m CD N r e{ O LO N W CD r r Co CD co to :- + co N r N N r N @ C m y m 0 8 Y co co o a V) w g e C ao 8 CO C-9 w C3 Z � w O S Y Q d Y W Q O O-a, w W = '6 Q 1, c 2 Z Y U 3 to O (A J F j m m Gl l o m m W O w -1 � Z m I=- F=- W Z = Z Z FW �_ o_ IL o O w O wY O cn O a Q o g 5 m M Z Z Z T- 1= U) U) co> �. to i-,l D EE 8 1" F.' 7,- llliz,7111 CL 'u'l c� E�-- Y "E's- S;-yl�� SUNRAY-BATTLECREEK 1 30 4,280,000 5,538,000 29.39% GREATER EAST SIDE 2 93 673,200 884,000 31.31% WEST SIDE 3 68 280,000 342,500 22.32% DAYTONS BLUFF 4 111 250,000 325,000 30.00% PAYNE-PHALEN 5 155 275,000 330,000 20.00% NORTH END 6 138 544,100 660,000 21.30% THOMAS DALE 7 79 240,000 300,000 25.00% SUMMIT -UNIVERSITY 8 191 360,000 477,800 32.72% WEST SEVENTH 9 54 300,200 402,500 34.08% Como 10 22 2,586,250 2,869,700 10.96% HAMLINE-MIDWAY 11 80 315,300 420,000 33.21% ST ANTHONY PARK 12 70 401,2150 464,000 15.64% MERRIAM 13 243 338,000 475,000 40.53% NUCALESTER-GROVELAND 14 123 531,300 637,700 20.03% HIGHLAND 15 144 761,350 900,0()0 18.21% SUMMIT HILL 16 115 522,000 600,000 14.94% DOWNTOWN 17 17 1,460,200 1,650,000 13.00% AIRPORT 20 0 ARDEN HILLS 25 4 3,080,000 3,270,000 6.17% BLAINE 29 0 FAIRGROUNDS 30 0 FALCON HEIGHTS 33 22 605,000 660,000 9.09% GEM LAKE 37 0 LAUDERDALE 47 17 907,500 1,020,000 12.40% LITTLE CANADA 53 33 330,000 360,000 9.09% MAPLEWOOD 57 77 1,540,000 1,740,000 12.99% MOUNDS VIEW 59 59 320,000 370,000 15.63% NEW BRIGHTON 63 60 974,250 1,050,000 7.78% NORTH OAKS 67 1 2,501,400 2,760,000 10.349/o NORTH ST. PAUL 69 62 300,000 380,000 26.67% ROSEVILLE 79 94 950,()00 1,020,000 7.37% ST- ANTHONY 81 22 990,000 1,080,000 9.09% SHOREVIEW 83 14 3,572,000 4,021,500 12.58% SPRING LAKE PARK 85 1 576,200 660,000 14.54% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 19 1,296,000 1,440,000 11.11% WHITE BEAR LAKE 93 49 1,900,000 2,160,000 13.68% WHITE BEAR TWP 97 1 4,200,000 4,410,000 5.00% CITY OF ST PAUL 1,733 410,000 540,000 31.71% SUBURBS 535 900,000 1,020,000 1333% COUNTYWIDE 2,268 483,050 600,000 24.21% 3/5/2004 9:33 MEDIAN ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE OF APARTMENTS IN CITY OF ST. PAUL* 2003 Assessment Payable 2004 to 2004 Assessment Payable 2005 Sorted by LUC 2003 p 2004 2004 p 2005 PROPERTY DESC. LUC # PARCELS Median Value Median Value % Change 4 TO 9 UNITS 401 868 266,200 330,000 23.97% 10 TO 19 UNITS 402 473 554,400 660,000 19.05% 20 TO 49 UN1TS 403 252 1,160,000 1,450,000 25.00% 50 UN1TS AND UP 404 123 4,450,000 5,665,000 27.30% APT MISC IIdPROV 406 10 61,800 75,450 22.09% FRATERNU ,/SORM-Tl. gO 407 7 329,600 368,500 11.80% CITYWIDE 1,733 410,000 540,000 31.71 % * Excludes added improvement in 2003 values, lease public property, exempt property, and vacant land 3/5/2004 9:33 12 MEDIAN ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE OF APARTMENTS IN SUBURBS* 2003 Assessment Payable 2004 to 2004 Assessment Payable 2005 Sorted by LUC 2002p2003 2003p2004 PROPERTY DESC. LUC # PARCELS Median Value Median Value % Change 4 TO 9 UNITS 401 I67 295,000 360,000 22.03% 10 TO 19 UNITS 402 134 837,050 1,020,000 21.86% 20 TO 49 UNITS 403 101 1,779,800 2,040,000 14.62% 50 UNITS AND UP 404 126 5,252,500 5,626,150 7.11 % APT MISC EMPROV 406 7 40.000 42,000 5.00% F ALL SUBURBAN 991 535 900,000 1,020,000 13.33°% j * Excludes added improvement in 2003 values, lease public property, exempt property, and vacant land 3/5/2004 9:33 13 VAL T= ME` Maximum F. �U valuc, SUNRAY-BATTLECR 1 68 568,900 618,950 8.80% $11,000,000 GREATER FAST SIDE 2 122 222,000 271,150 22.14% $4,577,400 WEST SIDE 3 206 349,100 389,200 11.49% $19,965,300 DAYTONS BLUFF 4 175 200,000 240,000 20.00% $15,106,200 PAYNE-PHALEN 5 329 187,300 225,800 20.56% $4,900,000 NORTH END 6 325 230,900 269,300 16.63% $14,300,500 THOMAS DALE 7 199 274,400 308,000 12.24o/o $6,510,000 SUMMff-UNIVERSlT 8 161 250,000 275,600 10.24% $9,678,200 WEST SEVENTH 9 234 303,900 356,650 1736% $9,900,000 Como 10 60 400,000 433,500 8.38% $21,000,000 HAMLINE-MIDWAY 11 187 325,200 357,100 9.81% $7,624,500 STANTHONY PARK 12 251 695,200 770,000 10.76% $12,298,000 MERRIAM 13 229 317,600 349,800 10.14% $18,375,000 MACALESTER-GROV 14 140 313,400 350,100 11.71% $1,489,400 HIGHLAND 15 137 446,900 500,000 11.88% $24,675,000 SUMMIT HILL 16 107 376,000 435,100 15.72% $8,742,900 DOWNTOWN 17 190 788,450 800,000 1.46% $68,379,700 AIRPORT 20 ARDEN HILLS 25 84 1,895,900 1,933,750 2.00o/o $34,449,400 BLAINE 29 25 914,400 953,000 4.22% $4,663,600 FAIRGROUNDS 30 FALCON HEIGHTS 33 17 498,000 564,200 13.29% $3,385,500 GEIM LAKE 37 27 329,000 371,500 12. 9 2""o $1,775,000 LAUDERDALE 47 14 612,600 665,950 8.71% $2,851,000 LITTLE CANADA 53 204 350,000 381,550 9.01% $7,500,000 MAPLEWOOD 57 331 700,000 694,300 -0.81% $220,000,000 MOUNDS VIEW 59 78 709,800 729,300 2.75% $12,100,000 NEW BRIGHTON 63 213 540,900 592,500 9.54o/o $6,255,800 NORTH OAKS 67 10 1,290,400 1,479,700 14.67% $7,982,500 NORTH ST. PAUL 69 118 291,000 318,850 9.57% $10,170,300 ROSEVILLE 79 422 1,247,400 1,286,900 3.17% $118,000,000 ST. ANTHONY 81 38 748,950 805,750 7.58% $7,426,200 SHOREVIEW 83 112 773,300 836,050 8.11% $37,555,700 SPRING LAKE PARK 85 2 177,600 193,550 8.98% $244,000 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 89 147 896,400 934,300 423% $10,322,700 WHITE BEAR LAKE 93 292 363,700 413,400 13.67% $8,240,300 WHITE BEAR TWP 97 56 865,700 906.200 4.68% $15,500,000 CITY OF ST PAUL 3,120 302,500 341,150 12.78% $68,379,700 SUBURBS 2,190 632,150 671,850 6.28% $220,000,000 COUNTYWIDE 5,310 389,700 429,400 10.19% $220,000,000 3/5f2004 9:34 14 Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization 4701 Highway 61, White Bear Lake, MN 55110, (651) 429-8522 REGULAR MEETING MEETING AGENDA 7:30 AM January 1 Z 2006 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of Minutes- 4. Report from the Chair - Introduction of new Board Commissioners 5. Treasurer's Report to the Board A. Annual report em B. Audit 6. New Business — A. 2005 Citizen's Lake Monitoring. Report — Leanne Lemire B. Election of Officers C. Declaration of Depository 7. Projects — updates / possible action A. Levy Discussion B. VLAWMO Joint Powers Agreement * C. Water Plan — scope of work & timetable D. Lambert Lake Project — update * 8. Old Business 9. Commissioner Reports 10. Administration Report * Office update 11. Public Comment 12. Adjourn * information in the packet; em - information via e-mail; ** supplement at the meeting VLAWMO Meeting —December 8, 2005 to the Local Government committee first. Bills must go through a policy committee. VLAWMO will need the support of our municipalities. We are in the process of setting up meeting with Rep. Meslow. A motion was made by John Youngstrom, seconded by Jeff McDowell that a letter be sent to our communities requesting their support in writing for this legislative effort, with a sample Resolution and other necessary background information. We will ask for their consideration at their January meetings. Vote: all aye. Motion passed. Water Plan. Request for Proposal (RFP). Jeff McDowell summarized interviews. Jim Jasques, TKDA gave brief presentation, however the firm was ruled out as not having the same level of experience and commitment as FOR & HDR. HDR gave us two costs and a very good presentation. FOR gave a good presentation. He asked the other members of the selection committee to give their impressions. Paul said both firms were able to do the job, lie wondered if the cost will creep up if we accept the lower bid from HDR without giving us the hydrologic modeling. HDR, he thought might give us more deluxe service. John Youngstrom was leaning toward more attractive price of EOR, but felt that HDR gave the better interview. He was still on the fence. Dave Schuler liked HDR the best and felt from their interview, that they will provide excellent service. Jeff McDowell noted that he felt the HDR staff could handle the political climate that may come up. A compromise of sorts, using the lower HDR price was discussed. Mark Burch said we operate like a city and can negotiate a price. HDR gave us a $3000 cost to define the model needs. A Motion was made by Paul Emeott, seconded by Steve Hasehnann to contract with HDR to provide us with consulting service to complete our third generation Water Plan with costs not to exceed $56,706 without prior authorization, and an additional $3000 to have the consultant work with the Board and staff to define the watershed needs for hydrologic modeling. Vote: all ayes except John Youngstrom. Motion passed. Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). Deferred. Lambert update — Dave discussed the stabilization of the north berm. We are also adding to channels south of the weir to get the water out into the wetland. DNR appears to be leaning toward shorter multiple channels. Steve Haselmann felt we will be working on channel design and maintenance for the next five years. Dave is hoping the channels will be maintenance free because of flow rates. Soil borings for additional sheet pile and a survey south of the weir are being completed. Commissioner reports. Jeff McDowell advised Mark Burch that due to a discussion with BWSR, a letter was sent to the City of White Bear Lake requesting a compliant representative to the VLAWMO Board. BWSR has advised us that our Water Plan will not be approved and any legislative tax district designation will be unlikely unless our Board appointees are legally compliant. Paul Emeott share the Gem Lake Hillary Farm wetland buffer signs. They provide a good template for others. Administration Report. Susan Rani has applied to be a representative from Vadnais Heights. Audit The letter of agreement with Tautges Redpath was discussed. A motion to approve that agreement to do the 2005 audit for $3500 was made by Paul Emeott and seconded by Steve Haselmann. Vote: all Aye. Motion passed. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 a.m. Submitted: Stephanie McNamara, Administration / Wetland Consultant Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization 4701 Highway 61, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Telephone 651-429-8522; Fax 651-429-8579; email: office@vlawmo.org Meeting of December 8, 2005 Commissioners Present: Lino Lakes Jeff McDowell Gem Lake Paul Emeott North Oaks John Youngstrom St. Paul Water Utility Steve Haselmann Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake Mark Burch White Bear Township The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair, Jeff McDowell at 7:40 A.M. Also Present: Dave Schuler & John Blackstone, SPRWS, Joe fox, Ramsey CD, Joel Schilling, Paul Nelson, HDR. Agenda. Motion was made by Steve Haselmann and seconded by Paul Emeott to approve agenda. Minutes. A Motion was made by Haselmann, seconded by John Youngstrom to approve the minutes from the previous month as submitted. All aye. Motion Rqssed. Chair — Treasurers Report. Stephanie went over the end of the year report. The Board reviewed the monthly expenses. A Motion was made by Haselmann, seconded by Emeott to approve the Treasurer's report. Vote: all aye. Motion passcd. Comforts of Home (Gun Club Road) Exemption Request This site in White Bear Lake has about 40% wetland. All but 355 square feet had been avoided on the plan. Staff and members of the TEP have reviewed the request and find it to meet criteria for the Deminimis exemption of the Wetland Conservation Act. Approval is recommended with the a condition. A Motion by Haselmann, seconded by McDowell to approve the Deminimis exemption as submitted with the following conditions: the applicant must follow the wetland rectification process (MN Rules 8420.0540, Subp. 5 as outline in WCA for all areas of temporary wetland impact adjacent to the retaining walls. Vote: All aye. Motion Passed. Levy Authority - Joel Schilling Joel Schilling reviewed his Memo. He recommended the third option — that VLAWMO pursue designation as a special purpose tax district under 275.066. Special taxing district is cost prohibitive. Some difficulties that may be encountered were discussed. The Board discussed metro wide effort but decided not to pursue it at this time. Jeff asked if we should add our name to House File 1496 from last year or introduce our own. We understood from our Rep. Bev Scalze that Rep McNamara would pursue this more aggressively if bipartisan support is available. Joel feels we are about 60% of the way there. Mark Burch favored merging effort in the interest of efficiency. Rep Scalze recommended going