The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006 10-02 CC PACKETCITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING 02 OCTOBER 2006 A duly noticed meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 02 October 2006 at 7:03 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Schilling, Rasmussen and Watson were present. Also present were City Clerk Magnuson, Mark Sweet of the Business Development Committee, City Engineer Justin Gese, Jim Norton and John Clebek of SEH, Inc.. Also present were Derek Wippich, Craig Rafferty, Bob Uzpen and Gretchen and Dale Swomley. Clerk Magnuson confirmed that a Public Notice of the meeting had been placed in the White Bear Press. Mayor Emeott then stated the purpose of this evening's meeting was solely for the purpose of matters related to the development of a joint community hall with White Bear Township. Motion by Schilling, Second by Rasmussen to approve the agenda as presented was unanimously approved. Magnuson presented the Request For Proposals developed by Mr. Rafferty on behalf of the joint community hall project. He explained that requests for work on the White Bear Township portion of the project has been deleted and is contained in a separate RFP being considered by the White Bear Township Supervisors this evening. RESOLVED. Motion by Schilling, Second by Watson to approve the RFP as presented and proceed with distribution was unanimously approved. Mr. Rafferty then tendered his written resignation from the Joint Community Hall Development Committee. RESOLVED. Motion by Bosak, Second by Rasmussen to accept Mr. Rafferty's resignation, to formally thank him for his professional guidance and management on the project to date, and to appoint Mr. Mark Sweet to the committee to insure adequate representation in the development process was unanimously approved. RESOLVED. Motion by Schilling, Second by Watson to approve Resolution No. 2006-36 empowering the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with White Bear Township that will facilitate development of the Joint Community Hall project; delineate the development, ownership and ongoing operational elements of the project; and, to request proposals for the work was unanimously approved. ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Emeott at 7:22 PM. AUTHORED: 05 October 2006 APPROVED: 160ctober 2006 ATTEST: ATTEST: Frederic Ma Pau meott City Cler ' Mayor efile: Minutes\2006\202octm.wpd MI 9 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-36 02 OCTOBER 2006 A RESOLUTION EMPOWERING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP ON BEHALF OF THE CITY PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A JOINT COMMUNITY MEETING HALL. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake did by means of Resolution No. 2005-25 establish a committee to meet with a committee from White Bear Township to discuss the benefits and feasability of joint development of a multi jurisdictional community meeting hall; and, WHEREAS, the committee established by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake has fulfilled the original challenge presented by the City Council and recommends the City proceed with the joint development of a community multi -use building that will serve and benefit the residents of both White Bear Township and the City of Gem Lake; and, WHEREAS, the City Attorney has expressed his opinion that the joint development and operation of a community multi -use building by the two entities can be achieved; and WHEREAS, the financial consultants and bond attorney for the City of Gem Lake have indicated that several methods of financing such an endeavor including, but not limited to, capital improvement bonds, may be used for said development; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake hereby empowers the Mayor and the Community Hall Development Committee to develop on behalf of the City of Gem Lake a Joint Powers Agreement with White Bear Township which provides for the development, ownership and ongoing operation of a community multi -use building to be located on property currently owned by White Bear Township and located immediately adjacent the City of Gem Lake to be executed by the Mayor and City Clerk; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake further empowers the Mayor and Community Hall Development Committee to initiate Requests For Proposals for design and development of a community multi -use building; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Hall Development Committee and the Gem Lake City Council will work in concert with White Bear Township to coordinate development of the community multi -use building to coincide with their needs during the relocation, renovation and redevelopment of the current White Bear Town Hall. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling and was supported by Councilor Watson and was rianinrari ndnnlnd hncerl nnnn the fnllnwino vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the itv Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. gx-"a e '/� 02 CO&API., 2006 Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date (tertif ieb CopU e-file: resolution\2006\no2006-36 Page 2 of 2 Project Overview White Bear Township and the City of Gem Lake have established a dual track program aimed at creating a new joint use City Hall facility and relocating the historic White Bear Town Hall. The projects are dependent upon the timely sequence of activities for each other inorder to complete both by the spring of 2008. This RFP for Architectural and engineering services is focused only on the City Hall portion of the work. The joint use City Hall (working title Heritage Hall) will contain about 3700 SF of new space on a single level with an option to include a partial or a full basement. The facility will be jointly used by both cities but it will primarily serve as a meeting hall and city offices for Gem Lake. White Bear Township will use the facility for voting, storage, and occasional meetings. In addition, while the old Town Hall is vacated for re -location and restoration, the joint use facility will be used more frequently by White Bear Township. Both projects have a unique connection with Minnesota's architectural heritage. Gem Lake is the location of several of noted Minnesota Architect Edwin Lunde's most successful projects. His influence lingers today throughout the Gem Lake's design sensibilities. The historic Town Hall and several other homes in the lake area were designed early in the career of Architect Cass Gilbert. His later career and projects evolved in a stark contrast of scale and notariety with projects such as the State Capital and the Woolworth Building in New York City. The new City Hall is intended to be architecturally derivative of Lunde's design vocabulary while responding to today's functional, code, and energy concerns. It is also to be a project that represents its own time and period so that it's own history can begin to be associated with the community. The City Hall project will be based on standard AIA contract services and will also require review of the program and schedule monitoring for overall schedule logic. joint Use City Hall Site The joint use faciltiy will be located at the intersection of Goose Lake Road and Otter Lake Road on a vacant 1.5 acre site (indicated as site 12 below). The property adjoins both the Township and the Ciity of Gem Lake. The cities are currently resolving the legal iissues in order to roceed with the joint effort. White Bebr Township `' ,.4c •H{ , �, � _ � 1. '•�\ � ell -�•'.�oil` � �-Gem Lake it I. F It \\-A, 49 Views of New City Hall Site 1 I 1 � ■ 1 rlK . • !a i 7 . r. 1 ■ c ■ ■ M 1 ti ti • 1 . ■ r. ■ ti T ■ ■ c r 1 . • i i1 1.1.E L � � .T ■ ' IL joint Use City Hall Space Requirements SPACE AREA DESCRIPTION 1 Entry Vestibule 50 Accessible 2 Entry area 50 space for 40 coats coats 3 Reception 100 4 Rest Rooms (2 @ 100) 200 Men's and Women's rest 5 Large Meeting Room 1200 Multi -use City functions. 6 Small Meeting Room 250 Smal Meetings up to 15 150 chair rolling racks, tables, 7 Storage room and polling equipment. 8 Control room 50 lighting controls and audio equipment 9 Office area 300 open office area for 2 50 Secure area for records 10 filing area 11 Kitchenette 50 open to reception area 12 General Storage 100 materials and supplies 13 Stair 150 access to basement 14 Janitor area 50 sink, attic ladder, supplies 15 second exit 50 from large meeting room 16 Equipment storage 200 exterior equipment subtotal 3000 gross 750 subtotal main level 3750 17 Basement 1000 partial w/ 1 exit 18 Mechanical space geo-thermal option? 19 Storage total area w/ basement 4750 full basement optional General Site Requirements Parking minimum 22 cars, water and sewer connections by city, outdoor patio, sidewalks, expansion option, maintain trees in clusters to screen adjacent property, low maintenance landscape. Combined Schedule Gem Lake New Joint Use City Hall Project all activities in this column are part of this RFP RFP for Architect selection Oct-06 Survey Completed New Site Oct-06 Soils Testing Oct-06 Architect Selection Oct-06 approval to proceed Oct-06 Complete Schematic Design Nov-06 approval to proceed Nov-06 Complete Design Development Jan-07 approval to proceed Jan-07 Utility Connection Design Jan-07 approval to proceed Complete Construction Documents Feb-07 approval to proceed Feb-07 Complete Utillity Design Mar-07 approval to proceed Mar-07 Bidding Process Mar-07 Contractor Selection Mar-07 approval to proceed Mar-07 City Utility Connections Completed Aug-07 Building Completed Sep-07 Move in Gem Lake City Offices Oct-07 Occupancy Complete Nov-07 J Whjit"ear Tovnsh�p White Bear Town Hall Relocation activities occuring in this col- umn are not part of this RFP Oct-06 Survey Relocation Site Oct-06 Soils Testing Relocation Site Jul-07 Relocation Contractor Selection Sep-07 Complete Utility Connections Oct-07 Temporary move to New Building Oct-07 Relocate Old Town Hall Mar-08 Complete Apr-08 Move Apr-08 Occupancy Complete 11-May-108 Sesquicentennial Request for Proposal Requirements Proposal to include team description including individuals who will work on the project, reponsibilities of each person, resumes', examples of similar experience, project approach, state- ment of ability to meet schedule, and a fee proposal. The selection will be made based on: 1. The experience and make-up of the proposed team. 2. Individuals who will lead the team. 3. Specific experience with Historic structures andsensitivity for Cass Gilbert's work. 4. Specific experience and sensitivity with Edwin Lunde's work. 5. Ability to meet the schedule. 6. Fee definition and Services related to the fee proposal. The proposals must be submitted by 2 PM to the office of the Gem Lake City Clerk at 1369 County Road E. East by 0018th, 2006. Four copies of the response will be required. Materials should be addressed to the Joint City Hall Committee. All submittals will be reviewed for compliance, under- standing, and experience. A selected number of repondents will be asked to attend an informal interview, occuring within 7 days of notification, in order to discuss the proposal and to meet the individuals who will lead the team. The consulting team selected will be notified within 3 days and a contract will be established using the AIA B141 contract Agreement Between Owner and Archi- tect and based on the schedule included in the RFP. The consulting team will be expected to hold reviews for approvals as part of the normal process which includes Planning Commission, Site Design reviews, and City Council reviews. However, these reviews will be held jointly between the cities so that the process is not duplicated for each city. Other logistical issues that could complicate a joint effort between two different cities will be resolved expediently. The schedule should be assumed free of roadblocks beyond the control of the consulting team for purposes of the submittal. Any questions should be addressed to the attention of Mark Sweet, Gem Lake Development Com- mittee, at 651 653 6626 or Msweet@aft.net. I October, 2006 Fritz Magnuson City of Gem Lake Clerk 1369 County Road e Gem Lake, Minnesota 55110-5231 Dear Mr. Magnuson: We have completed our preliminary work as the Gem Lake Committee for the Town Hall Development. I hereby submit my resignation as a member of this committee effective today, October 1, 2006. Thank you and good luck on the City Hall project. Sincerely, 6U4 Craig Rafferty 3750 Big Fox Road Gem Lake, Minnesota 55110 — 5231 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-36 02 OCTOBER 2006 A RESOLUTION EMPOWERING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP ON BEHALF OF THE CITY PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A JOINT COMMUNITY MEETING HALL. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake did by means of Resolution No. 2005-25 establish a committee to meet with a committee from White Bear Township to discuss the benefits and feasability of joint development of a multi jurisdictional community meeting hall; and, WHEREAS, the committee established by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake has fulfilled the original challenge presented by the City Council and recommends the City proceed with the joint development of a community multi -use building that will serve and benefit the residents of both White Bear Township and the City of Gem Lake; and, WHEREAS, the City Attorney has expressed his opinion that the joint development and operation of a community multi -use building by the two entities can be achieved; and WHEREAS, the financial consultants and bond attorney for the City of Gem Lake have indicated that several methods of financing such an endeavor including, but not limited to, capital improvement bonds, may be used for said development; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake hereby empowers the Mayor and the Community Hall Development Committee to develop on behalf of the City of Gem Lake a Joint Powers Agreement with White Bear Township which provides for the development, ownership and ongoing operation of a community multi -use building to be located on property currently owned by White Bear Township and located immediately adjacent the City of Gem Lake to be executed by the Mayor and City Clerk; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake further empowers the Mayor and Community Hall Development Committee to initiate Requests For Proposals for design and development of a community j multi -use building; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Hall Development Committee and the Gem Lake City Council will work in concert with White Bear Township to coordinate development of the community multi -use building to coincide with their needs during the relocation, renovation and redevelopment of the current White Bear Town Hall. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling and was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared adonted based upon the followine vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the 2ity Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date &rtif ieb Cinpu e-file: resolution\2006\no2006 36 Page 2 of 2 J CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 02 OCTOBER 2006 Mayor Emeott convened the October City Council Workshop at 7:22 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Schilling, Rasmussen and Watson were present. Also present were City Clerk Magnuson, Mark Sweet of the Business Development Committee, City Engineer Justin Gese, Jim Norton and John Clebek of SEH, Inc.. Also present were Derek Wippich, Craig Rafferty, Bob Uzpen and Gretchen and Dale Swomley. Mr. Norton, Mr. Clebek and Mr. Gese of SEH, Inc. Were then recognized and Mr. Norton presented on behalf of the group the "Municipal Water Supply Feasability Study" ordered by the City Council. Mr. Norton explained the criteria used, the involvement by various members of the City Council, Planning Commission and City Staff, and the general format of the study. The study is broken down into four (4) scenarios including self supply, supply from White Bear Lake, supply from Vadnais Heights, supply from White Bear Township and then a possible multi -supply approach. While no conclusions were drawn, it appears the study favors a relationship with White Bear Lake due to water quality, pressures adequate to provide fire flow throughout the City, and wholesale pricing although consideration and discussion will be needed for the Council to pursue the selected supplier. It was concluded that the "study" is more than adequate for inclusion in the next generation Comprehensive Municipal Plan. Discussion and specific questions from those present followed. Mayor Emeott then thanked Mr. Norton and his team for their efforts. Discussion then followed regarding future workshop topics including vision statements, alternative sources of revenue and grants. Mr. Magnuson will pursue possible presentations. Mayor Emeott then adjourned the workshop at 9:00pm. AUTHORED: 05 October 2006 APPROVED: 160ctober 2006 ATTEST: ATTEST: Frederic C. Magn n Paul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor efle: Minutes12006\203octwm.wpd EM-AMERMY! Page 1 of I Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 A� � e-0- e4,E CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 Public Hearing Minutes, 10-3-2006 The Gem Lake Planning Commission held a public hearing and its regular meeting, Tuesday, October 3, 2006 in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Planning Commission members Jim Lindner and Derek Wippich were present. Also present were Mayor Emeott, Walter Powell, Gretchen Swomley, and two residents were also in attendance. The public hearing was called to order at 7:10PM. The purpose of the hearing was to receive comment on two proposed ordinances, RMU and PUD, both drafted by Paul Emeott. JL will contact Planner Dan Jochum regarding meeting with the city attorneys to review possible existing ordinances for incorporation into the proposed ordinances. Paul also provided introductory material and background on underlying zoning as it will apply to these proposed ordinances. One resident expressed concerns that a PUD will change zoning for an area that impacts existing residents who are not part of the PUD. This may cause residents so impacted to feel "left out" of the process. There needs to be balance between existing zoning, the developer, and the residents adjacent to the proposed PUD. The next question asked at what point a PUD takes effect. This is where negotiations between the city and a developer will come into play. Either one can request that a PUD be considered for a particular parcel. After discussion on the above cited items, Lindner closed the public hearing at 7:55. Planning Commission Minutes, 10-3-2006 Interim Planning Commission Chair Lindner opened the October meeting at 7:55PM. Ong/O'Phelan Possible Subdivision Neither Ong nor O'Phelan were present for tonight's meeting. Paul did provide a set of steps for Ong and O'Phelan to follow should they wish to proceed with their possible subdivision requests. The proposed PUD ordinance may be applicable to this situation. One or two possible development strategies were discussed though nothing was formal ized. R1/Recreational Zoning Paul discussed the merits of changing the zoning of the golf course from R1 residential to recreational. It may help with Met Council requirements for Gem Lake housing needs. Herzog Variance There will be a public hearing before the City Council regarding the Herzog's request for a one foot variance to allow for a 16' high accessory building. The Planning Commission agree that the Site Review Committee can review this request and bring forward a recommendation to the City Council. Our main concern is we= don't allow "creep" of building heights in the future except where the request is reasonable, as in the case of storing an RV. Agreement in this instance does not establish a precedent that all other future requests will automatically follow. We will consider each on its own merits. Vision Statements JL read his prepared vision statement and suggested other Planning Commission members and city residents draft similar statements and get them to Walter Powell so he and Dan Jochum can compile them and create a unified statement for the entire city. Mayor Emeott wants the City Council to prepare statements on where they think the city will be in 2030. Due to Election Day, the next Gem Lake Planning Commission will meet on Tuesday, November 14, 2006. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:25PM. Jim Lindner Planning Commission Interim Chair CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING 16 OCTOBER 2006 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 1 16 October 2006 at 7:06 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Schilling, Rasmussen and Watson were present. Also present were City Clerk Magnuson, Planning Commission Chairman Jim Lindner, Rob Olson, Gretchen Artig-Swomley, Bryan Hansen, Bob Uzpen, Beth Herzog, Steve Herzog, and Craig Rafferty. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, the following actions were taken: 1) Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to approve the minutes of the 14 August 2006 City Council Workshop was unanimously approved: 2) Motion by Schilling, Second by Bosak to approve the minutes of the 05 September 2006 City Council Workshop was unanimously approved; 3) Motion by Bosak, Second by Watson to approve the minutes of the 14 September 2006 regular City Council meeting was unanimously approved; 4) Motion by Rasmussen, Second by Schilling to approved the minutes of the Joint Meeting with White Bear Township Board was unanimously approved; 5) Motion by Watson, Second by Schilling to approved the minutes ofthe 02 October 2006 Special City Council meeting was unanimously approved; 6) Motion by Watson, Second by Schilling to approve the minutes of the 02 October 2006 City Council Workshop was unanimously approved; 7) Motion by Bosak, Second by Rasmussen to approve the 16 October 2006 agenda as amended was unanimously approved. Motion by Schilling, Second by Watson to approve the Consent Agenda was unanimously approved. Magnuson reported on the comments by the various Contract Cities Managers regarding their City Council's feelings about Administrative Fines Ordinances and the opinions of both the State Auditor and State Attorney General. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the ordinance without traffic provisions at this time and to continue to support legislative pressure to provide for administrative traffic fines. Magnuson presented the revised Law Enforcement Agreement for the term 01 January 2007 through 31 December 2009 indicating only minor provisions had been amended. RESOLVED: Motion by Watson, Second by Schilling to approve the Contract Cities Law Enforcement Agreement and empower the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same on behalf of the City. J Mr. Rob Olson was recognized. Mr. Olson, partner with Doug Meslow as City Prosecutor, reported that Mr. Meslow has accepted an appointment as a District Court Judge and will no longer practice law with the firm. Mr. Olson will continue with the practice in White Bear Lake, will seek a new associate, and has been reconfirmed by the White Bear Lake City Council to perform their prosecution. Mr. Olson indicated he wishes to continue to handle prosecution matters for Gem Lake and will do so under the current fee schedule for 2007. RESOLVED: Motion by Schilling, Second by Watson to reconfirm Mr. Olson as City Prosecutor through January reappointments was unanimously approved. Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to approve Resolution No. 2006-37 declaring final costs for Public Improvement Project No. 2006-01 was unanimously approved. Motion by Schilling, Second by Bosak to approve Resolution No. 2006-38 ordering an assessment hearing for Monday, 13 November 2006, at 7:00 PM for the purpose of identifying assessments to be imposed as a result of Public Improvement Project No. 2006-0 1. RESOLVED: Motion by Bosak, Second by Schilling to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an accessory building on their property in accordance with their application and at a height not to exceed sixteen (1 60") feet was unanimously approved. RESOLVED: Motion by Emeott, Second by Bosak to approve the addition of two (2) additional "No Outlet" signs for Scheuneman Road to be placed 1) just south of the south golf course entrance and 2) at the south entrance to Hillary Farm was unanimously approved. RESOLVED: Motion by Bosak, Second by Rasmussen to accept the proposal from T.A. Schifsky was unanimously approved. Clerk Magnuson was asked to investigate cooperative funding of a barrier at Scheuneman Road on Highway 61 in lieu of the simple posts now in place. Page 1 of 4 Mr. Lindner reported on his participation in the Association of Ramsey County Historical Societies including a recent meeting in Shoreview. Mr. Bosak reported on website progress. Clerk Magnuson was asked to look into additional control measures for Scheuneman Road for the coming weekend when Scheuneman Road and Otter Lake Road will act as a primary detour for Highway 96 which will be closed west of Highway 61 to Otter Lake Road. ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Emeott at 8:05 PM. AUTHORED: 06 November 2006 APPROVED: 20 November 2006 ATTEST: Frederic C. Ma City Clerk i ATTEST: Paul R. Emeott Mayor efile: Minutes\2006\202octm.wpd Page 2 of 4 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-37 16 October 2006 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING A PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON PROPERTY OWNERS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-01, BIG FOX ROAD, LITTLE FOX LANE, HAVEN LANE, TESSIER ROAD 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, the Gem Lake City Council ordered Public Improvement Project No. 2006-01 and supported the work with the sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds by Resolutions No. 2006-06, 2006-07, 2006-12, 2006-16, 2006-17 and 2006-26 having held all properly noticed public hearings and having provided all properly published and otherwise delivered notices regarding Public Improvement Project to affected property owners; and WHEREAS, costs have been determined for Public Improvement Project No. 2006-01, and the contract price for said improvements is $157,826.14, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of said improvement which includes every item of cost of the improvement from it's inception to it's completion and all fees and expenses incurred or to be incurred in connection herewith amount to $83,699.69 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $241,525.83; Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake that: I . The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $241,525.83; and 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2007, and shall bear interest at the rate of five (5.0%) percent per annum from the date of adoption of the assessment resolution; and 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City's Consulting Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection; and 4. The City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was �A lara� #AAnlnd 11AQPA MIM1 the fnllnwinv vote NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the hate -6 �, z -16- 6c;&Aew 2005 Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certif ieb YCOB e-file: resolution\2006�io2006-37 Page 3 of 4 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-38 16 OCTOBER 2006 A RESOLUTION ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS OF THE COSTS OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-01, BIG FOX/LITTLE FOX/HAVEN/TESSIER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2006-38 passed by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on 16 October 2006, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of completing Public Improvement Project No. 2006-01, BigFox/LittleFox/Haven/Tessier Street Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the City Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake that: I . A public hearing shall be held at 7:00 PM on Monday, 13 November 2006, in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford, 1493 East County Road E, Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55110 to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment; and 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the public hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment not less than two (2) weeks prior to the public hearing; and 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of the assessment. The owner of any property may, at any time thereafter, pay to the County Assessor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December3l of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Schilling and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was derl.gred adnnti?d haled unon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST 1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a-t e and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date firsyW on. G'xe�e '/� Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk N Certif ieb Date e-file: resolution\20Mno2006-38 Page 4 of 4 4 CITY OF GEM LAKE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2006-01 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Big Fox Road *** Little Fox Lane *** Tessier Road *** Haven Lane COST INCURRED BY COSTS INCURRED FOR COSTS T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. Contractor for Keconstruction of Streets SI57,826.14 SEI I, Inc. Engineering & Project Management 53,476.00 Ehlers & Associates. Inc. Bond Financial Consultant 5,000.00 Kennedy & Graven Bond Counsel 3,500.00 Wells Fargo Bond Discount Bond Issuer 4,750.00 Provision For Prepaid Interest - 02/012007 Bond Reserve Required by Law 4,623.69 Provision For Prepaid Interest - 08/012007 Bond Reserve Required by Law 5,267.50 City of Gem Lake Project Management, Assessment & Accounting Staff Time 7,082.50 SUB -TOTAL PROJECT COSTS S241,525.83 ORIGINAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS 245,000.00 COST DIFFERENTIAL OVER / (UNDER) ESTIMATE (S3,474.17) run: 10/14/2006 at 10:53:48 AM Page I or I efile: ProjectCostsI.123 i i O z cT f0 a ti O O 04 LU m .21 LU a Lb 0 H N U N z ,� u u c� c-s .� r-J n m p p oC (•, O O I C O_ l o l C q 0 O I O^ O c o 12 o ^ _ v-. [n v+' In [n � Y in •n •n I +n I� •i vs � ^ .n �'�-• •n � •n n w v, v[ H vi vt, h r w �n In ,r. vs Jn •n r, I I vl vs vl� vs u, [n In In In In 5I = iY , U Y kj w w w _ a1 4.1 L.I Lll W� ly III Lrl W Ly .JJ W W; w w W rA./ J, 'J, 1 Y X X :C aC Y lie ?4 1` :� �G J F F _ F .cw. .0 .0 x w z r6 w l w w z? c I r-I w w w u `w si rJ"i +i iS u`S w w l w w w ui w C7 C7 a T) ❑ t� C7 [d7 V t7 In nc nr rll Yx>cxx��ggooe ? 2 2 '� O O C. O C+ 0 0 O' G UI O t 7 Z Z Z Z 17 III rj w w w w w w w w w m 0 o I w _ U w R r. W �1 w; W � k� til •� �� `� .i� w w w ti7 in v� Imo' w iJ m CI dJ m 8 m `m m p. i m rn l m s p p z p z x .a -a .a • a [-- �- R >n L1 -P-pp m •1 O ^ [,T{r 'v�i r�i n � ^ N rct M Ir1 � � .^ � y O �- � +' rll.', IA �_ � ,p `Lr'� � .n �G �G I`• 1� e0 m , [r G 41 � T P O. O. O, ry ^ r + [ 1 [ I 1 r+ rl r:; r•'1 m m M N M M M M M M � � � '- --rrI r1 ri fn r • I � ry a c, a a c c, o, Jr o. of cl of s. o, 14 � -- �. Ir ci. •s c' u Co� �o 0o w� oo ao rn M. •r M r^ m m (n (r: m M M en M fY rl N N � rl rr rl rn C'] ram. r . Q� C• C, rn • vs In vi cr' e1' � •* v� ' .T T �ry Q[ Gy y- [h 7 I]� [>\ •1 Vi �'i ,11 �(' 1 Lt '?,•' Im R[' aO� P wl �� (•� V i4 G4 r/1 Gs V. r/1 N V] N Vl 0 69 io V, Orll VS CA In I !fr th W v. .rill -ric. [f3 rfi J� IA I F I u ceix 7 I Y ' ofa W in G•' �S := c; .T. CJ I O {a.] 2 p 1' d z 4il a 4 w 7 Y C3� a L, I in O Cs c a0 M z fA � � AI V �� A rn vi, � : � � � U � � �; ul � U • C J riJ IT- 1 �[7 q7 'Ft V U a. 7 :r a� 1 U •{ uJ 1 ❑ X q, W mI U f.. w .f q Z+ 7- -- J 1 wI c7 ❑ is < :< rr_ tIII O ;z :z w O hslI 3 c F K, v .: O a t� v cw7...a� q uA. U� O W c`; r%�t0--•I N •l v `I v '✓ U GI ut [], u ry n M1 r+ n r- M1 .+I r`- p n ,n N v v iV �I ry •_ -c� •-I ry J [, n, •7 -S ^S T! y 7 Y 7 7 7 4 V -It l TI V V -A J -J ti- V V V 'S V Cr R er a, .'• •_[ ._', ', r', .', +_ ._; J o o �_ d o d d d d d dl d d_ Ja o d d d o c o o w n v+ ti r, vs vJ v, v, In Y• vl n ^ V1 v �' •^ •• .r, : n in In +n irl •n In �. n I -... Irl IA n n h In •n, N ij� N Ip, V't V1 In M Y1I Yl I/1 •.'JI [r [1"I : . II'1 Y1 'rJ Y+ YI YI J F a g li a o ^c �R n n r �r'� V V, L V U V .�1 ._l l .� C I2 x I m I C i rL a c_ >e x H K c°c a o Ia o o, Iol m m m apl Llm m m w 'lo ga aA °.P' a a a e m Z. .. r •, IL1 tL >b CA Oil W W m CS 12 m ! ra m 12 = x W x .� '.3'.-I a .J -a ...1 i-J F F- h- F F-` l i^ a - C. n1 ell m , a' 7 o IO n O O O .o: O•.- W W .-•. �`• o. O. eems}}• . r ..�. V w va n r r7 (n m n +n • I I I+I I.1 rl vl rJl ri rll rl m m ^+ M M +n m m M m � - N fi N fi M N fJ •^ ^ ^ ^ ^ C'7 Y4' 1`7 [`1 IV f1 N z::4 oef a r4 s ca a rJc of a[ ai i rK ae z a cK oe i I o a s I.I-1 WW m 4 QJI nl m i -• a �— P O [h `O r1 'O r' G+ O •n (n � n n r�i n !� I r+ p� l C, o S{ o o o 0 0 r. 171n ^ V- V J J .�i V J x .t n I r i l .^ •� r et •� '7 ^ 'O V Q 7 � N Ni rl rl N N N N N rl ri rl N ri N N fl rJ 0 f.I f-1 q(y q[�[ (,Iy r.r1 Cy rV •I `I N N! S r-II fv r9 4 fv' ry v V N ••I N N r[ N nl nl N_ ri nl (N r] t_! Pk ri N N Ui M1 N [n I m rn ^' M t7 M NI rr: r✓.i. (�1 (n � 0o I x co eo ea aP o0 w ' o0 0o N ^- W » ae �o 0o co c0 '� rl W W W w w w w c m m . ir: .rani N, v l I Iv .. r I r+ nll rl J rli f 1 J 1 N rJ N CI N It r'i 'I T. A. SCmirnff do SONS, INC. Tennis Courts Landscape Rock Salt Sand October 11, 2006 2370 Highway 36 NORTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109 Telephone 651-777-1313 Fax 651-777-7843 City of Gem Lake 1369 E County Rd E White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Attn: Fritz Magnuson Hot Mix - Wholesale and Retail Bituminous Surfacing Crushed Rock and Gravel RE: Tessier Rd, Haven Ln, Big Fox Rd, Little Fox Lane, Scheuneman Rd (Otter Lake Rd to Hwy 61), Hoffman Rd (E of 61 & N & S of CR E), & Frontage Rd. Dear Sir: These are our hourly prices for snow removal equipment for the 2006-2007 snow plowing season, as per your request. LARGE TRUCK WITH PLOW AND WING......................................$150.00 HR TRUCK FOR SPREADING SALT SAND .......................................... 120.00 " SALTSAND PER TON............................................................... 27.00 « Salt Sanding by request Fuel surcharge may apply. Thank -you Accepted by City of Gen T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc David W. Schifsky j F:\2006-2007 Snow Plow Season\City of Gem Lake Bid - 2006-2007.doc r 4 , rD T. A. SCHIINNY dk SOMV INC. Tennis Courts Landscape Rock Salt Sand October 11, 2006 2370 Highway 36 NORTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109 Telephone 651-777-1313 Fax 651-777-7843 City of Gem Lake 1369 E County Rd E White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Attn: Fritz Magnuson Hot Mix - Wholesale and Retail Bituminous Surfacing Crushed Rock and Gravel RE: Tessier Rd, Haven Ln, Big Fox Rd, Little Fox Lane, Scheuneman Rd (Otter Lake Rd to Hwy 61), Hoffman Rd (E of 61 & N & S of CR E), & Frontage Rd. Dear Sir: These are our hourly prices for snow removal equipment for the 2006-2007 snow plowing season, as per your request. LARGE TRUCK WITH PLOW AND WING......................................$150.00 HR TRUCK FOR SPREADING SALT SAND .......................................... 120.00 " SALTSAND PER TON............................................................... 27.00 « Salt Sanding by request Fuel surcharge may apply. Thank -you Accepted by. City of Gem Lake T.A. Schifsky & Sons, a'� -� (,Aj David W. Schifsky F:\2006-2007 Snow Plow Season\City of Gem Lake Bid - 2006-2007.doc /� code AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES This is an Agreement between the County of Ramsey (hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY"), and the City of Shoreview (hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY"), to provide law enforcement services to the MUNICIPALITY for the period commencing January 1, 2007. WHEREAS, the COUNTY has a statutory obligation to provide police protection within Ramsey County; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has previously contracted to provide law enforcement services to the cities of Arden Hills, Gem Lake, Little Canada, North Oaks, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, and to White Bear Township (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "MUNICIPALITIES"), and WHEREAS, the MUNICIPALITY has determined that it is in the best interests of the MUNICIPALITY to continue to contract with the COUNTY for law enforcement services, thereby allowing for the allocation of overhead and other administrative costs over a larger population; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement intend to contract for law enforcement functions within the political boundaries of the MUNICIPALITY through the Ramsey County Sheriff, and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is agreeable to rendering such services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.59 and 436.05, and Laws 1959, Chapter 372. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual undertakings set forth herein, the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY agree as follows: A. SCOPE OF SERVICES The COUNTY agrees, through the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department, to provide law enforcement services to the MUNICIPALITY which will include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Patrol services with random patrolling of residential areas, businesses, parks, and other public property areas; b. Enforcement of Minnesota State Statutes and the ordinances of the MUNICIPALITY. Ij J c. Traffic enforcement including the regular use of radar or laser as a speed deterrent; d. Crime prevention programs such as Neighborhood Watch, as well as other business and residential crime prevention programs; e. Criminal investigative and crimes lab services; f. Follow up on reported crimes with persons who reported the crime including routine notification by telephone or mail as to the status of the investigation; g. Responses to medical, fire, and other emergencies; h. Coordination of volunteer programs such as the Community Affairs Officer and Reserve Programs; i. Driver's license inspections, background checks and license enforcement services as called for under applicable state law and ordinances of the MUNICIPALITY; J. Special event traffic patrol and patrol services for community festivals or other special events; and k. Attendance at Public Safety or City Council meetings as requested by the MUNICIPALITY. 2. The manner and standards of performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the provision of services under this Agreement, and the control of personnel so employed, shall be subject solely to the control of the COUNTY. In the event of a dispute between the parties as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the level or manner of performance of such service, the determination thereof made by the Sheriff of the COUNTY shall be final and conclusive as between the parties hereto, subject however, to the provisions of Section A.3. herein. 3. In the event the MUNICIPALITY, through its elected body or authorized agent, notifies the COUNTY that the MUNICIPALITY is dissatisfied with the assignment of personnel for the performance of services under this Agreement and requests a change in personnel, the COUNTY shall make every effort to effect a change in the assignment of personnel, provided that such a change does not jeopardize the ability of the COUNTY to provide services to other areas of Ramsey County in a timely and efficient manner. 4. The COUNTY' S contractual obligations under this Agreement do not lessen the COUNTY' S obligation to provide patrol and police protection services to Bellaire Beach, area lakes, Ramsey County open space areas, and regional park areas owned or operated by Ramsey County and all other areas under COUNTY jurisdiction located within the political boundaries of the MUNICIPALITY. The COUNTY' S contractual obligations under this Agreement shall also recognize the underlying, N statutory obligations that Ramsey County has to provide police protection to the MUNICIPALITY. 5. Services shall be provided 24 hours per day and shall be performed by the number of deputies and other personnel budgeted for in the COUNTY'S Approved Budget for these services to the MUNICIPALITIES. 6. To facilitate the COUNTY' S performance pursuant to this Agreement, the MUNICIPALITY agrees that the COUNTY shall have full cooperation and assistance from the MUNICIPALITY, its officers, agents and employees. The MUNICIPALITY shall designate a liaison to the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department. The liaison shall attend meetings of the Sheriffs Contract Communities Committee and shall represent their respective MUNICIPALITY at their meetings. The purpose of these meetings is to develop short-term and long range plans and to coordinate and analyze police service and other related public service issues. The Sheriffs Contract Communities Committee shall also review any disputes which arise between the MUNICIPALITIES and/or Sheriffs Department and recommend a resolution. 7. The COUNTY shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, communication facilities and dispatching, and supplies necessary to provide services pursuant to this Agreement. 8. All deputy sheriffs, clerks, dispatchers, and all other COUNTY personnel performing duties pursuant to this Agreement shall at all times be considered employees of the COUNTY for all purposes. 9. The name of each of the MUNICIPALITIES that contract with the Sheriffs Department for law enforcement services shall be affixed to all squad cars and other major pieces of equipment used primarily within these MUNICIPALITIES. B. ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES/INSURANCE 1. Except as otherwise provided, the MUNICIPALITY shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salaries, wages, or other compensation to any COUNTY personnel performing services hereunder for said MUNICIPALITY, and the COUNTY hereby assumes said liabilities. 2. Except as herein otherwise specified, the MUNICIPALITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any COUNTY employee for injury or sickness arising out of this employment, and the COUNTY hereby agrees to hold harmless the MUNICIPALITY against any such claim. 3 3. The MUNICIPALITY, its officers, and employees, shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the intentional or negligent acts of the COUNTY or the COUNTY' S employees performing services pursuant to this Agreement, and the COUNTY shall hold the MUNICIPALITY, its officers, and employees harmless from and shall defend and indemnify the MUNICIPALITY, its officers, and employees against any claim for damages arising out of the COUNTY' S performance of this Agreement. 4. The COUNTY, its officers, and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negligent acts of the MUNICIPALITY or of any other officers, agent or employee thereof, and the MUNICIPALITY shall hold the COUNTY and its officers and employees harmless from, and shall defend and indemnify the COUNTY and its officers and employees against any claim for damages arising out of the MUNICIPALITY'S performance of this Agreement. 5. The COUNTY agrees to maintain, during the term of this Agreement, automobile, general liability, workers' compensation, and professional liability insurance in amounts deemed appropriate by the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall name the MUNICIPALITY as an additional insured on these policies except for the workers' compensation policy. The MUNICIPALITY agrees to pay, as a part of the actual cost as provided in -� Section 6 below, a pro rata share of the COUNTY' S insurance costs. `• These costs shall include the costs for any assessments and credits for any dividends by participating in any insurance pools or trusts. The COUNTY may elect to self -insure all or any portion of these risks. If the COUNTY cannot obtain insurance and/or elects to self -insure, the MUNICIPALITY shall pay a pro rata share of the costs of self-insurance, based on each MUNICIPALITY'S share of the approved annual budget. Insurance costs as they relate to insurance coverage shall include premiums and deductibles. Costs of self-insurance shall include reserves, claims and damage payments, and administration costs required to maintain self- insurance. j 6. The MUNICIPALITY acknowledges that the COUNTY may, in an effort to provide the best insurance coverage at the most economical cost, become a member of the Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust or some similar organization; and the MUNICIPALITY further acknowledges that membership in such an organization may be for a fixed minimum term and may expose the COUNTY to some type of contingent cost liability, such as debts, obligations and liabilities, in the event that the COUNTY withdraws its membership. The MUNICIPALITY agrees to reimburse the COUNTY for the MUNICIPALITY'S pro rata share of any such contingent cost liability arising during the term of this Law Enforcement Service Contract and assessed against the COUNTY. Upon notification to M the COUNTY of any such contingent cost liability, the COUNTY will notify the MUNICIPALITY in a timely manner. C. TERM OF AGREEMENT/TERMINATION 1. This agreement shall commence January 1, 2007 and shall be in effect through December 31, 2009. If either party intends not to renew the agreement at the end of its term, the party must notify the other party and other MUNICIPALITIES in writing at least nine (9) calendar months prior to the end of the contract term. If either party has not approved a successor agreement at the end of the term, the COUNTY will continue to provide law enforcement services in accordance with this agreement. 2. Either party may terminate this Agreement at the end of a calendar year and prior to the end of the term of the Agreement by notifying the other party to this Agreement and the other MUNICIPALITIES in writing of their intent to terminate the Agreement at least nine (9) calendar months prior to the end of the calendar year. 3. Notice to the COUNTY shall be given to the County Manager and Ramsey County Sheriff, and Notice to the MUNICIPALITY shall be given to the MUNICIPALITY'S City Manager. Notice to the other MUNICIPALITIES will be given in accordance with the notice provisions of the contracts between the COUNTY and the other MUNICIPALITIES. D. COST AND PAYMENT 1. The MUNICIPALITY agrees to pay the COUNTY the actual cost of providing all services covered by this Agreement. Actual cost shall mean the MUNICIPALITY'S pro rata share of the COUNTY' S total cost of providing patrol and police protection services as described in this Agreement to the MUNICIPALITIES with which the COUNTY has agreements for the current contract year, including, but not limited to the following: salaries of employees engaged in performing said services, including vacation and sick leave; mileage, uniforms; public employees retirement contributions; workers' compensation, automobile, general liability and police professional liability insurance costs or the cost of self- insurance; general overhead, including indirect expenses and supplies, radio unit expense, and health and welfare expense. The term "costs" as used herein shall not include items of expense attributable to services or facilities normally provided or available to all cities within the COUNTY as part of the COUNTY' S obligation to enforce state law. Computation of actual costs hereunder shall be made by the Ramsey County Budgeting & Accounting Division based on information provided by the Sheriff. 5 2. During the term of this Agreement, the COUNTY shall annually submit a Budget Estimate using the District Plan format for the following year of services to the MUNICIPALITY no later than August 1 of the current year. Said Budget Estimate will be for the limited purpose of better enabling the MUNICIPALITY to estimate its annual budget and tax levy. It is understood by the parties to this Agreement that said Budget Estimate shall in no way prevent the COUNTY from charging its actual costs. 3. If the MUNICIPALITY does not allocate the necessary funding for its proportionate share of the COUNTY' S Approved Budget to the MUNICIPALITIES for a given year, the MUNICIPALITY and the COUNTY must meet by January 31 of the budget year in question to review and reach agreement on modifications to service levels provided by the COUNTY that are consistent with the MUNICIPALITY'S budget and that recognize the impact of these service level changes to other MUNICIPALITIES that contract with the COUNTY for these services. 4. Unless the COUNTY and MUNICIPALITY have reached agreement pursuant to the prior paragraph for a change in the MUNICIPALITY'S contribution, the COUNTY shall bill the MUNICIPALITY on a monthly basis in advance in an amount equal to one -twelfth (1/12) of the Budget Estimate for services to the MUNICIPALITY. The MUNICIPALITY shall pay the COUNTY within 45 days of receipt of the monthly ' statement. At the close of the contract year, the COUNTY will reconcile the current year Budget Estimate and current year actual costs, shall provide a copy of the current year actual cost to the MUNICIPALITY, and shall either give a credit to the MUNICIPALITY or bill the MUNICIPALITY for additional costs in excess of the Budget Estimate. J E. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. It is understood that prosecutions for violations of ordinances or state statutes, together with disposition of all fines collected pursuant thereto, shall be in accordance with state statutes, state rules, and judicial orders. 2. The Ramsey County Sheriff s Office shall submit to the MUNICIPALITY quarterly activity reports detailing the activities of the Sheriff's Office under this agreement within the MUNICIPALITY. Said reports shall contain, at a minimum, the number of calls answered and the number of citations issued. However, no information will be provided which would violate the State Data Practices Act. 3. The MUNICIPALITY may contract with the COUNTY for additional law enforcement services above and beyond those provided in this agreement. 0 1 4. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, signed by authorized representatives of the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY and attached to the original of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the MUNICIPALITY, by resolution duly adopted by its Council has caused this Agreement to be signed by Paul R. Emeott, Mayor and Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk and Administrator, and the seal of the MUNICIPALITY to be affixed hereto on the 16"' day of October, 2006, and the COUNTY, by resolution of its Board of County Commissioners, has caused this Agreement to be signed by the Chair and Chief Clerk of said Board on the day of _ 2006. COUNTY OF RAMSEY By: Chair Board of Ramsey County Commissioners SO Bonnie Jackelen, Chief Clerk Board of Ramsey County Commissioners APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: Bob Fletcher Sheriff of Ramsey County APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant Ramsey County Attorney FUND: Office of Budget and Accounting i CITY OF By: an Paul R. Emeott Mayor Frederic C. Magnuson City Clerk and Administrator VA 1 ARDEN HILLS %CIIANGE EST COST 2007 EST COST 2006 EST COST 200-5 EST COST 2004 PATROL DEPUTIES $600,776.97 $588,273.33 $561.239.51 S547.028.40 INVESTIGATION DEPUTIES $78,392.80 $76,899 51 $69,936.68 $68,981.61 PROPERTY FLEET ASST $10,085.29 $9.974.76 $9,542-31 $8,668.35 EQUIP&MAINT $71,393,77 $67,256 85 $59,937.67 S62.819.52 TRAFFIC DEPUTY $16.779.25 $15,415.63 $14,354.01 $14,158.85 TRAFFIC DEPUTY #2 $9,749.35 $6,572.33 $0.00 $0.00 CRIME PREY $15,928.83 $15,648.00 $14,916.25 $12.805.81 RADIO CHARGE $0.00 $0.00 $31,596.60 $32,851.43 ESTIMATED REVENUE ($45 401 06) $50,123.04) (S42,778.67) SUBTOTAL nus%i.rr 2.99% $757,705.20 $735,723-55 $711,400.00 $704,535-30 TOTAL GEM LAKE PATROL DEPUTIES $48,839.23 $47,821-82 $45,623.58 $44,476.83 INVESTIGATION DEPUTIES $6,677.61 $6,550.41 $5,957.31 $5,541.26 PROPERTY FLEET ASST $859.08 $5,965.18 $849.66 $5,619.53 $812.83 $5,007.99 $696.32 $5,248,78 EQUIP&MAINT TRAFFIC DEPUTY $1,369.31 $1,260.19 $1,173.05 $1.147.05 TRAFFIC DEPUTY #2 $4,874.68 $1,033-39 $3,286.17 $1,015.17 $0.00 $967.70 $0.00 $793.04 CRIME PREY $0.00 $0.00 $2,691.44 $2,638.94 RADIO CHARGE ESTIMATED REVENUE ($3 943 05) (33.771.75) ($4.097.78) SUB TOTAL sras�,.ri 4-86% $65,675.43 $62,631.20 $58,136.12 $57,078.26 TOTAL LITTLE CANADA PATROL DEPUTIES $649,468.29 $635,985.04 $606,780,67 $591,112.00 INVESTIGATION DEPUTIES $94.770.73 $92,965.46 $12,058.70 $84,547-94 $11,535.91 $94,432-35 $11,866.53 PROPERTY FLEET ASST $12,192.32 $71,387.00 $67,250.47 $59,931-99 $62,813.56 EQUIP&MAINT $18,263.44 $16,861.67 $15,702.00 $15,841.15 TRAFFIC DEPUTY $26,810.72 $16,430.83 $0.00 $0.00 TRAFFIC DEPUTY #2 $17,450.51 $17.142.86 $16,341.20 $15.069.68 CRIME PREY $0.00 $0.00 $38,197.81 $44,971.95 RADIO CHARGE ESTIMATED REVENUE ($50 358 82) ($48 745 74) ($54 408.85) ($47.328.43) SUBTOTAL S3+5•243-"-° 3.71% $839,984.18 $809.949.28 $778,628-66 $788.778-79 TOTAL NORTH OAKS PATROL DEPUTIES $360.173.61 $352.670.58 $27,306.30 $336,459.25 $24.833.87 S319,884.46 S25.592.82 INVESTIGATION DEPUTIES S27.836 56 $3,581 19 S3.541.94 $3.388.39 $3,216.04 PROPERTY FLEET ASST $43,991.31 $41,442.22 $36,932.31 $37,750.04 EQUIP&MAINT $9.539.44 S8.624.57 $8.037.56 $7,792.54 TRAFFIC DEPUTY 50.00 $3,286.17 S0.00 $0.00 TRAFFIC DEPUTY #2 $65.019.89 $36.741.64 50.00 $0.00 SECURITY CSO $5.921,92 $5,817.52 $5,545.47 $4.871.67 CRIME PREY S0 00 S0.00 S11,219.66 $12.188.19 RADIO CHARGE ESTIMATED REVENUE ($25,639.99) ($25.326 53) ($28,552.13) ($23.986.54) SUB TOTAL. s„uus, 5.00% $490,423.93 $454,104.41 $397,764.36 $387,309.22 TOTAL PAGE 1 9/1912006 Proposed 800 MHz Radio Allocation - Contract Communities 5 43 20 68 Model 5000 (Encrypted) $ 4,221.16 Model2500 $ 2,398.76 Model Mobile $ 3.304.75 Less: Ramsey County Reimbursement - 68 @ 1,995 Total Costs to Contract Communities Total $ 21,105.80 $ 103,146.68 $ 66,095.00 $ 190,347.48 $ 135,660.00 $ 54,687.48 Crim Prev Patrol Rice St Invest Traffic Total % Arden Hills 0.14 5.41 0.17 0.76 0.15 6.63 15 Gem Lake 0.01 0.45 0.07 0.01 0.54 1 Little Canada 0.16 5.41 0.67 0.92 0.17 7.33 17 North Oaks 0.05 3.34 0.27 0.09 3.75 9 Shoreview 0.32 10.06 0.33 1.43 0.29 12.43 29 Vadnais Heights 0.18 4.9 0.5 0.95 0.16 6.69 16 White Bear Township 0.14 4.43 0.33 0.6 0.13 5.63 13 Totals 1 34 2 5 1 43 100 Radios % of Total Dollars Annual Fees Arden Hills 10.2 15.00% $ 8,203.12 $672.00 Gem Lake 0.68 1.00% $ 546.87 $44.80 Little Canada 11.66 17.00% $ 9,296.87 $761.60 North Oaks 6.12 9.00% $ 4,921.87 $403.20 Shoreview 19.72 29.00% $ 15,859.37 $1,299.20 Vadnais Heights 10.88 16.00% $ 8,750.00 $716.80 White Bear Township 8.84 13.00% $ 7,109.37 $582.40 Totals 68 $ 54,687.48 $4,480.00 Contract Cities Annual Fees MESB Fee $28.00 County Fleet Support $38.00 Total $66.00 Total Annual Fee($66.00 X 68 radios) $4,480.00 (MESB fee for 2007 is estimated at $28 to $40 range, based on state subsidy level) Department of Public Works Kenneth G. Haider, P.E., Director and County Engineer 1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112-3933 • (651) 266-7100 • Fax (651) 266-7110 RAMSEY COUNTY E-mail: Public.Works@co.ramsey.mn.us October 13, 2006 Mr. Fritz Magnuson City of Gem Lake 1369 East County Road E Gem Lake, Minnesota 55110 Dear Fritz: This letter constitutes the official jurisdictional transfer of Scheuneman Road (County Road 147) from County Road E to Highway 61 and Hoffman Road (County Road 146) from Highway 61 to County Road E. These jurisdictional transfers are in accordance with Resolution 2006-315 of the Ramsey County l Board of Commissioners. The transfer is also in accordance with Resolution 2006-33 of the Gem Lake City Council. This jurisdictional transfer will become effective November 1, 2006. As stated in the concurring resolutions, "Ramsey County will pay to the City as just compensation for these jurisdictional transfers up to $70,126 upon presentation of billings from the construction contractor(s) for the reconstruction of these segments of Scheuneman Road and Hoffman Road, and that upon receipt of the billings, the County shall reimburse the City in accordance with Minnesota State Statute 471.425." The City shall submit the receipt of billings to: Mr. Tony Lutgen Ramsey County Public Works Department 1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Thank you for your support in exploring with us new ways of providing government services. Enclosed is a copy of Ramsey County Resolution 2006-315. Please contact me at 651-266-7104 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kenneth G. Haider, P.E. Director and County Engineer TAM Enclosure Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post -consumer content Resolution Board of Ramsey County Commissioners Presented By Commissioner McDonough _ Date September 26, 2006 No. 2006-315 Attention: Budgeting and Accounting Ken Haider, Public Works Page 1of3 City of Gem Lake WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local Government Services Study Commission to "report on the advantages and disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating..." activities in areas of public service including public works; and WHEREAS, The Functional Consolidation Plan provides for reclassification of roadways and corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and WHEREAS, Scheuneman Road (County Road 147) from County Road E to Trunk Highway 61, and Hoffman Road (County Road 146) from Trunk Highway 61 to County Road E, located in the City of Gem Lake, are presently under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as County Roads; and WHEREAS, These roadways have been determined to serve a local function only; and WHEREAS, Revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by resolution of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §163.11; and WHEREAS, The Functional Consolidation Plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve the roadways to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over roadway segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey County Capital Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes §383A.16 requires that Ramsey County shall, before transferring jurisdiction over roadway segments, improve each highway to a condition consistent with a Ramsey County pavement management system score of ninety; and RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER nny Bennett Carter )Im McDonough Rafael Ortega Jan Parker Victoria Reinhardt Janice Rettman Tony Bennett, Chair (Continued) am Bonnie C.Jackelen Chief Clerk - County Board Resolution Board of Ramsey County Commissioners Presented By Commissioner McDonough _ Date September 26, 2006 No. 2 0 0 6 -315 Attention: Budgeting and Accounting Ken Haider, Public Works Page 2 of 3 City of Gem Lake WHEREAS, The City of Gem Lake desires to reconstruct both Scheuneman Road from County Road E to Trunk Highway 61 and Hoffman Road from Trunk Highway 61 to County Road E and fund the reconstruction projects with Municipal sources, and up to $70,126 from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation; and WHEREAS, The City of Gem Lake has agreed that by accepting these jurisdictional transfers and receipt of up to $70,126 for the reconstruction of these segments of Scheuneman Road and Hoffman Road from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation that Ramsey County has fully discharged its obligations to the City arising under Minnesota Statutes §§163.11 and 383A.16 and the Functional Consolidation Plan, and that it has no expectation of funding of the ongoing maintenance of these segments by Ramsey County; Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners hereby revokes the "County Road" status of Scheuneman Road (County Road 147) from County Road E to Trunk Highway 61, and Hoffman Road (County Road 146) from Trunk Highway 61 to County Road E and transfers jurisdiction over these roadways to the City of Gem Lake, effective after the Ramsey County Office of Budgeting and Accounting has encumbered the funds necessary to fund the reconstruction projects; and Be It Further RESOLVED, The County shall transfer its interest in the public road right-of-way and road easements to the City for the delineated roadways it currently holds; and Be It Further RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER my Bennett i Carter lirri McDonough Rafael Ortega Jan Parker Victoria Reinhardt Janice Rettman Tony Bennett, Chair (Continued) By Bonnie C. Jackelen Chief Clerk - County Board Resolution Board of Ramsey County Commissioners Presented By Commissioner McDonough _ Date September 26, 2006 No. 2 0 0 6 -315 Attention: Budgeting and Accounting Ken Haider, Public Works Page 3 of 3 City of Gem Lake RESOLVED, This transfer is conditioned upon receipt by Ramsey County of a resolution adopted by the City of Gem Lake concurring with the County revoking the "County Road" status of Scheuneman Road from County Road E to Trunk Highway 61, and Hoffman Road from Trunk Highway 61 to County Road E, and further providing that receipt of up to $70,126 for the reconstruction of these segments from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation that Ramsey County has fully discharged Ramsey County's obligations to the City arising under Minnesota Statutes §§163.11 and 383A.16 and the Functional Consolidation Plan, and that the City of Gem Lake has no expectation of funding of the ongoing maintenance of these segments by Ramsey County; and Be It Further RESOLVED, That upon receipt of this resolution Ramsey County will pay to the City as just compensation for these jurisdiction transfers, up to $70,126 upon presentation of billings from the construction contractor(s) for the reconstruction of these segments of Scheuneman Road and Hoffman Road, and that upon receipt of the billings, the County shall reimburse the City in accordance with Minnesota State Statute 471.425; and Be It Further RESOLVED, The County Board authorizes the Ramsey County Engineer, within the limits of this resolution, to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdiction changes executed. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ))SS I, Bonnie C. Jackelen, Chief Clerk —County Board, duly appointed and qualified for Ramsey County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 2006-315, adopted by the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners on September 26, 2006. Dated at St. Paul, Minnesota, this loth day ofsle�ober, 2006. RAMSEY COLTNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VFA NAY _)ny Bennett X_ t Carter X Fim McDonough X_ Rafael Ortega _X Jan Parker _ x Victoria Reinhardt X Janice Rettman X_ Bonnie C. Jackejelil Chief Clerk — unty Board Tony Ben et chair By Bonnie C. Jackele Chief Clerk - u Board CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-33 14 September 2006 _ A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 1993-07 AND NO. 2004-06 REGARDING GEM LAKE'S PARTICIPATION IN RAMSEY COUNTY FUNCTIONAL CONSOLIDATION OF ROADWAYS BY ACCEPTING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS AND AMENDING THE CONDITIONS OF SUCH ACCEPTANCE. WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local Government Services Study Commission to "report on the advantages and disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating..." activities in areas of public service including public works; and WHEREAS, the Gem Lake City Council did by means of Resolution No. 1993-07 agree to accept ownership of certain Ramsey County roadways in the City of Gem Lake subject to certain conditions: and WHEREAS, The Functional Consolidation Plan provides for reclassification of roadways and corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and WHEREAS, Scheuneman Road (County Road 4147) from County Road E (Ramsey County Road #15) north to Trunk Highway 61, located in the City of Gem Lake, is presently under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as a County Road; and WHEREAS, Hoffman Road West (County Road #146) from Trunk Highway 61 north to County Road E (Ramsey County Road # 15), located in the City of Gem Lake, is presently under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as a County Road; and WHEREAS, These roadways have been determined to serve a local function only; and WHEREAS, Revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by resolution of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 163.11; and WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Gem Lake that the streets hereinafter described upon tumback from Ramsey County should be designated a City Streets under the provisions of Minnesota Law: and WHEREAS, The Functional Consolidation Plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve the roadway to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over roadway segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey County Capital Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes §383A.16 requires that Ramsey County shall, before transferring jurisdiction over roadway segments, improve each highway to a condition consistent with a Ramsey County pavement management score of ninety; and WHEREAS, The City of Gem Lake desires to reconstruct both Scheuneman and Hoffman Road West as described herein and fund the reconstruction project with Municipal sources, and up to $70,126 from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation; and WHEREAS, The City of Gem Lake has agreed that by accepting this jurisdictional transfer and receipt of up to $70,126 collectively for the reconstruction of these segments of Scheuneman Road and Hoffman Road West from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation that Ramsey County has fully discharged its obligations to the City arising under Minnesota Statutes §§ 163.11 and 383A.16 and the Functional Consolidation Plan, and that it has no expectation of funding of the ongoing maintenance of this segment by Ramsey County; Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED, The City of Gem Lake does hereby concur with the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners revoking the "County Road" status of Scheuneman Road (County Road # 147) from County Road E (Ramsey County Road # 15) north to Trunk Highway 61 and Hoffman Road West (County Road It146) from Trunk Highway 61 north to County Road E (Ramsey County Road # 15), and accepts transfer of jurisdiction over these roadways to the City of Gem Lake, effective after the Ramsey County Office of Budgeting and Accounting has encumbered the funds necessary to fund this reconstruction project up to $70,126; and Be It Further 8 Page 1 of 2 14 September 2006 RESOLUTION NO.2006-27 RESOLVED, The County shall transfer it's interest in the public road right-of-way and road easements to the City of Gem Lake for the delineated roadways it currently holds; and Be It Further RESOLVED, This transfer is conditioned upon receipt by Ramsey County of this resolution adopted by the City of Gem Lake concurring with the County revoking the "County Road" status of Scheuneman Road (County Road # 147) from County Road E (Ramsey County Road #15) north to Trunk Highway 61 and Hoffman Road West (County Road 4146) from Trunk Highway 61 north to County Road E (Ramsey County Road # 15), and further providing that receipt of up to $70,126 for the reconstruction of these segments from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation that Ramsey County has fully discharged Ramsey County's obligations to the City arising under Minnesota Statutes §§163.11 and 383A.16 and the Functional Consolidation Plan relative to this segment of roadway, and that the City of Gem Lake has no expectation of funding of the ongoing maintenance of these segments of roadway by Ramsey County; and Be It Further RESOLVED, that upon receipt of this resolution Ramsey County will pay to the City as just compensation for these jurisdiction transfers, up to $70,126 upon presentation of billings from the construction contractor(s) for the reconstruction of the segments of Scheuneman Road and Hoffman Road, and that upon receipt of the billings, the County shall reimburse the City in accordance with Minnesota State Statute 471.425; and, Be It Further RESOLVED, the Gem Lake City Clerk is authorized within the limits of this resolution to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdiction changes executed; and Be It Further RESOLVED, the City Of Gem Lake recognizes that no additional consideration of other Ramsey County roads originally included as part of Gem Lake's Resolution No. 1993-07 remain as previously established by the City Council. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Schilling and was supported by Watson and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK Aye Aye Absent Aye Aye VOTE ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the C itv of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk :14 10&m W 2006 Date Certified Copy e-file: resolution\200fto2006-33 Page 2 of 2 LAW OFFICES MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC 2125 2ND STREET WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55110 DOUGLAS B. MESLOW dougmeslow@wbilaw.net ROBB L. OLSON robbolson@wbllaw.net October 3, 2006 Mr.. Fritz Ma nusol: _ City Clerk City of Gem Lake 1369 E. County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110 Re: Prosecution contract Telephone (651) 426-1533 Facsimile (651) 426-6732 E-Mail: lawyers@wbllaw.net Dear Mr. Magnuson: We appreciate and enjoy our relationship with Gem Lake. I aiil very interested in continuing to serve as City Attorney (Prosecutor), and am proposing to go forward at the following rates for 2007: 2004/2005 rates 2006 rates 2007 Out -of Court time $ 98.00/hour $100.00/hour $ 100.00/hour Pre -trials $ 80.00/case $ 85.00/case $ 85.00/case Lour[ Trials $ y0.00/case 95.001case $ S_;.00/Cazsu Jury Trial appearances $ 150.00/case $ 160.00/case $ 160.00/case As previously, our hourly rate applies to appellate work, preparation for Jury"l'rials and actual time in jury trial. We will not charge the City for preparation for Pre -trials or Court Trials, or for court appearances at Arraignments. As you are aware, Doug Meslow has been appointed as a District Court Judge in Anoka County effective December 13, 2006. I will be continuing as the City Prosecutor for White Bear Lake, and hope to continue in this capacity for the City of Gem Lake. Please feel free to contact me with questions or comments. I will plan on attending the City Council meeting on Monday, October 16. Sincerely, 0� Robb L. Olson Meslow & Olson, PLLC RLO/sp 0 i Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 10/14/2006 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Hutch Schilling, Council Richard Bosak, Council Tom Rasmussen, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Signatures A roving Claims For Payment Date Of Approval DATE DATE DATE / 4 / jv DATE / 11' /0to/ DATE e e l / / DATE CLAIM# PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM I S AMOUNT I GENERAL FUND SEWER I FUND SP 2129 16-Oct-2006 Metropolitan Council Current User Charges: November 2006 1,038.47 1,038.47 SP 2130 16-Oct-2006 Gopher State One -Call 31 tix @ $1.45/ea 44.95 44.95 SP 2131 16-Oct-2006 SEH, Inc. Sanitary Sewer Maintenance I 386.00 - 386,00 SP 2132 16-Oct-2006 MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM _ 280.15 SP 2132 16-Oct-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC SewerAdministration:Sep/O I.3 hours _ 111,40 SP 2132 16-Oct-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC AsstClerkSewer:Sep/Oct-02.75 hours ��_ 178.75 GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 KELLY & FAWCETT, P.A. .TOTAL CLAIM 17,6_67.70 _ GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. i GeneralCounsel _ 1,420.00 GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. GeneralCounsel _ 4,710.891 _ GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. Annexation Matters_ Bryan Hansen 1,512.50 GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly& FawpeLP P.A. GeneralCounsel 5,440.00 -_ GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly& Fawcett, P.A. GeneralCounsel: Expenses 350.65 GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly& Fawcett, P.A. GeneralCounsel: Finance Charge 30.20 GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett. P.A. Annexation Matters: Bryan Hansen 2.100.00 GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A Annexation Matters: Expenses 276.00 G P 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett. P.A. Annexation Matters: Finance Charge 7.46 '-� GP 6930 GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P A Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. Annexation Matters: McNulty Annexation Matters: Tom Hanson 1,155.00 ;, 280.001 �J GP 6930 16-Oct-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. Annexation Matters: Hartford 385.00 , GP 6931 16-Oct-2006 Mark A. Sweet AttendlnterGovMtgs: 8 Mtgs x S25/mtg 200.00 200.00 GP 6932 16-Oct-2006 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE TOTAL CLAIM 1.26433 GP 6932 16-Oct-2006 City of White Bear Lake Fire & Paramedic: October 2006 _ 942.33 GP 6932 16-Oct-2006 City of White Bear Lake 1 Fire Marshall & Inspections: October 2006 _ 322.00 GP 6933 16-Oct-2006 CINDY SHILTS TOTAL CLAIM _ 375.00 GP 6933 16-Oct-2006 Cindy Shilts Permit Closure #SC2006-06 _ 187.50 _- GP 6933 16-Oct-2006 Cindy Shilts I Permit Closure #SC2006-07 _ 187.50 GP 6934 16-Oct-2006 Waste Management 1 Curbside Recycling: October 2006 314.00 314.00 GP 6935 16-Oct-2006 INTERNAL REVENUE_ SERVICE TOTAL CLAIM 441.24 1 _ GP 6935 16-Oct-2006 Internal Revenue Service 3rd Qtr 2006: Employee SS Payment -i- 17_8.79 GP 6935 16-Oct-2006 Internal Revenue Service 3rd Qtr 2006 City SS Payment I 178.79 GP 6935 16-Oc1-2006 Internal Revenue Service 3rd Qtr 2006: Employee Medicare Payment ! 41.83 _ GP 6935 16-Oct-2006 Internal Revenue Service 23rd Qtr 2006: City Medicare Payment I 41.83. GP 6936 16-Oct-2006 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSI TOTAL CLAIM 87.18 GP 6936 16-Oct-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 3rd Qtr 2006: Building Permits (FixedFees<$1,010) 1.00 GP 6936 16.Oct-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 3rdQtr2006: Building Permits (Fixed Fees>$ 1,0 10) I 1.18' GP 6936 16-Oct-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 3rd Qtr 2006: Building Permits (Per Valuation) 109.00 GP 6936 16-Oct-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 3rd Qtr 2006: Plumbing Permits 0.50 GP 6936 16-Oct-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 3rd Qtr 2006: Mechanical Permits 0.50 GP 6936 16-Oct-2006 Department of Labor and Industry 3rd Qtr 2006: Permit Retention (25.00), GP 6937 16-Oct-2006 Eklin Soil Testing and Inspections. Inc. 2006 Septic Inspections: 112 Homes @ $25/ea 2,800.00 2,800.001 GP 6938 16-Oct-2006 LEONARD,O'BRIEN,SPENCER,GALE&Si TOTAL CLAIM 1,636.05. GP 6938 16-Oct-2006 Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre Hansen Detach/Annex 712.50 GP 6938 16-Oct-2006 Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre Hansen Detach/Annex 923.55 GP 6939 16-Oct-2006 SEH, INC. TOTAL PAYMENT 5,159.61 GP 6939 16-Oct-2006 SEH, Inc. PIP 2006-02 Water Feasibility 2,900 11 GP 6939 16-Oct-2006 SEH, Inc. City Eng Svcs: Misc Extra Service 529.001 V Rtln: 10/16/2006 at 03:27:20 PM Page 1 of 2 File: 06claim10.123 Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 10/14/2006 N Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Hutch Schilling, Council Richard Bosak, Council Tom Rasmussen, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Signatures roving Claims For Payment Date Of Approval / DATE It ONQ�Gpp DATE /0 / l6/ pro DATE A-11 DATE DATE1�* r C DATE 0/4 / Ve; DATE GENERAL I SEWER CLAIM# PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM S AMOUNT I FUND FUND GP 6939 16-Oct-2006 GP 6939'' 16-Oct-2006 GP 6940 16-Oct-2006 GP 6940 16-Oct-2006 GP 6940 16-Oct-2006 GP 6941 16-Oct-2006 Gil 6942 16-Oct-2006 GP 6943 16-Oct-2006 GP 6943 16-Oct-2006 GP 6943 16-Oct-2006 GP 694316-Oct-2006 GP 6943 16-Oct-2006 GP 6943: 16-Oct-2006 GP 6943 16-Oct-2006 GP 6943 16-Oct-2006 GP 6943 • 16-Oct-2006 SEH, Inc. _ SE_H, Inc. RAMSEY COUNTY _ Ramsey County Ramsey County Xcel Energy Rick Johnson Deer and Beaver, Inc. MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson -& Associates. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC ALL 10/16/2006 OCTOBER SUMMARY 8.33% Of Budget Monthly ALL 10/16/2006', YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY 83.33% Of Year Completed ALL 10/16/2006 1 VERSUS ANNUAL BUDGET 83.33% Of Year Completed PIP 2006-01 Road Feasibilty 1,586.00 PIP 2006-04 BusSew/Wat Feasibility 144.50 TOTAL CLAIM 5,765.29 Law Enforcement: October 2006 5,533.58 911 Dispatch Services 9/I/2006-9/30/2006 23171 Street Lighting: September 2006 75.03 75.03 Removal of Dead Deer @ $100/ea 100.00 100.00 1 TOTAL CLAIM 1 4,040.11 Telephone&Facsimileservice: Scp/0006 l 124.76 OMCCSupplies,Copying&Postage: Scp/Oc106 262.81 _ Mileage(292 (R S0.445)/Sep/Oct06 l 129.94 InternetAccess-(50%):Sep/Oct06 12.95 GeneralAdministration:Sep/Oct-23.1 hours 1,801.801 CapitalProjectAdmi_nisuation:Sep/Oct-02.2 hours 171.60 ElectionAdministmtion:Sep/Oct-03.1 hours 155.00 AsstC1erkGeneral:Sep/Oct-21.25 hours 1,381.251 f TOTAL FOR OCTOBER $41,675.11 $40,205.69' $1,469-42 % Annual Budget 11.36% 10.96%i 0.40% TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE $487,695.49I $469,335.41 $18,360.08 % Annual Budget 132.98% I 148.15% 36.76% Annual Budget $Under/($Over) ($182,073.82) ($205,338.74) $23,264.92 Annual Budget %Under/-%Over -49.65% 1 -64.82% 46.58% Run: 10/16/2006 at 03:27:20 PM Page 2 of 2 File: 06claim10.123 GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT Y OF GEM LAKE GENERAL C 24045.36 32001.88 iCowry Road "E" East FUND A 01/01/2005 START 73120.25 491636.70 442561.81 49074.89 Gem L IM, MN 55110-5231 CHECKING K I 32,542.98 BANK 24045.36 TRAM TRAN # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR N DEBIT CREDIT BALANCE BALANCE DATE I2-Sep-06 1 City of Gem Lake - Capital Prodeet Fund Inv0iccsPdToSEHForEn meermgOn PIP.N2006 9 29,734.74 56,077.85 56,077.85 13-Sep.o6 2 City of Gem Lake - Ca ital Project Fund Mauson&Assoo Admin Time For PIP #20064 gn 9 3.OV-50 59,160.35 59,160.35 07-Se I The ZeVan Corporation Public Relations Services for the of Gem 9 (5,000.00 54,160.35 54.160.35 14- P6902 ALLEN O. ZEPPER TOTAL CLAIM 7,917.38 46,242.97 54,160.35 19-Se 6 3P6903 Mark A. Sweet Atl xftterGovMtgs: 37 M x $2Shn 9 (925.An 45,317.97 53,235.35 19-Se -06 3P69041 Premier Bank Safe Deposit Box Rental Fee 9 50,00 45,267.97 53,185.35 27-Se 6 3P69051 RAMSEY COUNTY TOTAL CLAIM 9 5,765.29 39,502.68 47 420.06 25-Se -06 P6906 Waste MarAgemVd Curbside Re clin : September 2006 9 314.00 39,188.68 47 106.06 20-Se 6 3P6907 PRESS PUBLICATIONS TOTAL CLAIM 9 414.38 38,774.30 46,691.68 20-Se -06 3P6908 SEK INC. TOTAL CLAIM 9 (4,379.18 34,395.121 42.31150 21- P6909 CITY OF WIM BEAR LAKE TOTAL CLAIM 9 (1,264.33 33,130.791 41 048.17 21-Se 6 3P6910 MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC TOTAL CLAIM 9 360.80 32 769.99 40 687.37 21-Se -06 3P6911 Xcel E Street Lighting: August 2006 9 74.30 32,695.69 40,613.07 14-Se 6 3P69121 Allen O. Zepper Senior Building Official 2006 ICC Registration 390.00 32,305.69 40,613.07 20-Se 06 3P69131 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CTITES TOTAL CLAIM 9 497.00 31,808.69 40,116.07 27-Se -06 jP69141 Walter Powell Payment 1 of 5 ($10/hr for Est 200 hours) 9 (400.00 31,408.69 39,716.07 27-5 06 1`6915 1 FlTZGERAI.D LAWN CARE, INC. TOTAL CLAIM 9 240.00 31 168.69 39,476.07 25-Se -06 3P6916 Damon Farber Associates Hartford Meeting Facilitation 9 (3,556.46 27,612.23 35,919,61 18-Se -06 3P6917 MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM 9 (4,024.75 23 587.48 31,894.86 22-Se -06 3P6918 MOLLY BONIN TOTALCLAIM 9 (175.00 23,412.48 31,719.86 21-Se -06 06919 KRISTINA SWANSON TOTALCLAIM 9 (150.00 23,262.48 31,569.86 29-Se -06 3P6920 DAWN SEGERMARK TOTALCLAIM 9 (138.00 23.124.48 31,431.86 26-Se -06 FIP6921 GABRIELLE BLAKE TOTALCLAIM 9 (138.00 22,986.48 31,293.86 14-Se 06 1`6922 Tom Rasmussen 3rd Qtr'06 Salary ($206.00-12.77w2.99mm (190.24 22,796.24 31,293.86 18-Se -06 3P6923 PAUL R EMEOTT TOTAL CLAIM 9 535.60 22,260.64 30 758.26 28-Se 06 3P6924 Richard Bosak 3rd '06 Sniffy 5206.0042.77W2.99mm 9 190.24 22,070.40 30 568.02 15 P6925 HILARY MAGNUSON TOTALCLAIM 9 150.00 21,920.40 30 418.02 P6926 Hutch Schillin 3rd '06 Salary ($206.00-12.77ss-2.99mm) 9 190.24 21,730.16 30 227.78 9-SCp 06 3P6927 Chuck Watson 3rd '06 Sal ($206.00-12.77ss-2.99mm) 9 190.24 1 21,539.92 30.037.54 15-Se -06 3P6928 Sarah Cobian 3rd '06 Sal ($772.50-47.89ss-11.20mm) 9 713.41 20,826.51 29 324.13 18-Se 06 3P6929 Frederic C. Mwuson 3rd '06 Sal ($772.5047.89ss-11.20mm) 9 713.41 20,113.10 28,610.72 08-Se 06 1 Paul R Emeott MinnesotaAffadavitForCandidacyFilingFee(May 9 2.00 20,115.10 28,612.72 08-S 06 2 Charles Watson MinnesotaAffadavitForCandidacyFilingFee(Co 9 2.00 20 117.10 28,614.72 08-Se 06 3 PRICE'S CONSTRUCTION TOTAL PAYMENT 9 1,4121.88 2152998 30,027.60 08-Se -06 4 1 ZWE s Utllites, Inc. Sewer Conversion Permit #SC2006-06 9 250.00 21 779.98 30,277.60 08-Se -06 5 BRKW A raisaK Inc. DocumentSales:ElectronicGemLakeZoningMap 9 21.837.91 60 30,335.53 08-Se 06 6 Peterson, Frain & Bergman Professional As Document Sales: CompPlan & Zoning Ordin 9 47.93 47.93 21 837.91 30,335.53 08-Se -06 7 S & P CONSTRUCTION TOTAL PAYMENT 9 1,168.35 23,006.26 31,503.88 12-Se 06 1 State of Minnesota (Wire Transfer) Traffic Fines: September 2006 9 262.50 23 268.76 31 766.38 14-Se 06 1 Gretchen Arti-Swomley MhvwsoWAPlhda WorCandi FdingFoe( MinnesotaAffadavitForCandid Fil' ee(Co 9 2.00 23,270.76 31 768.38 14-Se 6 2 Rick Bosak 9 2.00 23,272.76 31,770.38 14-Se 6 a ra's Utilities, Inc. Sewer Conversion Permit #SC2006-07 9 250.00 23,522.76 32,020.38 14-Se -06 ITY OF GEM LAKE - SEWER FUND TOTAL PAYMENT 9 404.30 23,927.06 32424.68 29-Se -06 �14 remier Bank Interest Paid This Period 9 118.06 24,045.12 32542.74 09-Oct-06 remier Bank Ad'usbnM for Bank Error on Check #6924 9 0.24 24,045.36 32,542.98 j Run Date: 10/09/2006 at 11:38:57 AM E-File: CheckinglGenFund06.123 Page 1 of 1 Premier Ba n k %! li???LSG't "CJi?CCl. !'i; iili?_'SGzC riC'C . CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Page: 1 Account Number: 6005590 Statement Date: 9/29/06 Checks/Items Enclosed: 28 86 PREFERRED ELITE Now offering Health Savings Accounts Contact your branch office for more infromation CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND $eginning Balance 9/01/06 Deposits / Misc Credits 5 Withdrawals / Mi.sc Debits 26 9/30/06 ** Ending Balance Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 9/30/06 Interest Paid Year To Date Annual Percentage Yield Earned Number of Days for A.P.Y.E. Average Balance for A.P.Y.E. Average Collected Balance Minimum Balance Enclosures Miscellaneous Cred':is Acct 6005590 27,343.11 35,749.26 30,549.39 32,542.98 ** .00 118.06 2,808.18 3.92 30 37,310.09 37,310 22,343 28 Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description Date 9/08 2,893.16 DEPOSIT MN STATE FINANCE/ACH PY14T 9/12 262.50 GEM LAKE CITY OF TRANSFER FROM 6103844 9/13 31,817.24 DEPOSIT 9/14 658.30 Interest Earned 9/29 118.06 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CITY OF GEM IJKE Paid Checks Date Check No. 9/19 6903* 9/19 6904 9/27 6905 9/25 6906 9/20 6907 9/20 6908 9/21 6909 9/21 6910 Daily Balance Summary ate Balance 9/07 22,343.11 9/08 25,236.27 9/12 25,498.77 9/13 57,316.01 9/14 57,974.31 9/15 57,110.90 j Account Number: Statement Date: Page: 2 6005590 9/29/06 * indicates skip in check numbers Amount Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. 6-9-1 74.30__9/26 6921 138.00 S,GGG.GG 9/2i 9/20 6913* 497.00 9/18 6923* 535.60 925.00 50.00 9/27 6914 400.00 9/28 6924 190.00 5,765.29 9/27 6915 240.00 9/15 6925 6926 150.00 190.24 314.00 9/25 6916 3,556.46 9/19 9/19 6927 190.24 414.38 9/18 6917 4,024.75 175.00 9/15 6928 713.41 4,379.18 9/22 6918 150.00 9/18 6929 713.41 1,264.33 9/21 6919 360.80 9/29 6920 138.00 Date Balance Date Balance 9/18 51,837.14 9/25 39,296.21 9/19 50,481.66 9/26 39,158.21 9/20 45,191.10 9/27 32,752.92 9/21 43,341.67 9/28 32,562.92 9/22 43,166.67 9/29 32,542.98 SEWER FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT )V OF GEM LAKE i County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 SEWER FUND CHECKING C H K I N 05 Jan START 42,968.82 27903.38 BANK BALANCE 39837.98 25810.59 65648.57 TRAN DATE TRAN # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR DEBIT CREDIT 27902.38 BALANCE 20-Se 6 SP2124 Metro litan Council Current User Charges: October 2006 9 -1038.47 29350.00 29351.00 22-Se 06 SP2125 Gopher State One -Call 27 tix @ $1.45/ea+ 1 EmerVoicetix@ $4.50 9 -43.65 29306.35 29307.35 20-Sep-06 SP2126 SEH, Inc. Sanitary Sewer Maintenance 9 -807.001 28499.35 28500.35 18-Sep-06 SP2127 MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM 9 -240.501 28258.85 28259.85 14-Se -06 JISP21281CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND TOTAL CLAIM 9 404.301 27854.55 27855.55 08-Se 06 1 Dan & Mary Marier 2nd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 9 43.00 27897.55 27898.55 29-Se 6 1 Premier Bank Interest Paid This Period 9 4.83 27902.38 27903.38 Run Date: 10/09/2006 at 11:45:21 AM E-File: Checking2SewerFund06.123 Page 1 Premier BankLI•�liiri?L'SO:C �ZU;iIUi1zP50�`r Uf7CI'CtL�r. CITY OF GEM LAKE SEWER FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM jim, MN 55110-5231 NOW OFFERING Page: 1 Account Number: 6005582 Statement Date: 9/29/06 Checks/Items Enclosed: 6 86 Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture NON PROFIT pRRMLER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE Acct 6005582 SEWER FUND Beginning Balance 9/01/06 389.47 30, 4'7,83 Deposits / Mims --Credits 2 5 2,533.92 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 9/30/06 27,903.38 ** ** Ending Balance .00 Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 9/30/06 4.83 44.14 Interest Paid Year To Date Annual Percentage Yield Earned .20 Number of Days for A.P.Y.E. 30 29 05 Average Balance for A.P.Y.E. ,395.30 229,9 Average Collected Balance ,395 Minimum Balance 6 Enclosures Miscellaneous Credits Deposits Withdrawals Activity -Description Date 9/08 43.00 DEPOSIT Interest Earned 9/29 4.83 Paid Checks * indicates skip in check numbers Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. 9/20 2124 1,038.47 9/20 2126 807.00 9/14 2128 404.30 9/22 2125 43.65 9/18 2127 240.50 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CITY OF GEM LAKE Daily Balance Summary Date Balance Date Balance 9/20 27,942.20 9/14 .30,028.17 Account Number: Statement Date: Page: 2 6005582 9/29/06 Date Balance 9/29 27,903.38 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT ^' OF GEM LAKE 2004-2006 BONDS C PREMIER BANK WBL )Camtg Road "E" East CAPITAL PROJECT FUND H 03-Nov-04 START 0.00 t,em Lake, MN 55110-_5.231 CHECKING #6103844 K -787116.81 992037.57 545857.85 204920.76 TRAM CHECIN CHECKS TO I 204920.76 BANK DATE # DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR N DEBIT CREDIT BALANCE BALANCE 13- 6 1 Gem Lake General Find InvoicesPdToSEHForEn eeringOn PIP #2006- 9 28,734.74 208 003.26 208,003.26 13-Seo-06 2 Gem Lake General Fund Magnuson&Assoc Admin Time For PIP #2006-0 9 3,082.50 204,920.761 204,920.76 Run Date:10/09/2006 at11:46:39 AM E-File: Cheeking3Project06.123 Page 1 Premier Bank Minnesota Ozoned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GELS LARE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE LET 55110-5231 NOW OFFERING Page: 1 Account Number: 6103844 Statement Date: 9/29/06 Checks/Items Enclosed: 0 86 Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture CITY OF GEM LAKE Acct 6103844 NON PROFIT PREMIER PLUS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 9/01/06 236,738.00 Beginning Balance .00 Deposits / Misc Credits 0 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 31,817.24 1 204,920.76 ** ** Ending Balance 9/30/06 .00 Service Charge 217,648 Average Balance ,648 Average Collected Balance 221717,648 Minimum Balance 920 Miscellaneous Debits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 9/13 31,817.24 TRANSFER TO 6005590 Daily Balance Summary Date Balance 9/13 204,920.76 MIEP:ieER FDIC Date Balance Date Balance SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DEBIT FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT OF GEM LAKE 2006 BONDS FROM PIP2004-01 C DEBT SERVICE H Ol-Jan OS START 0.00 I County Road "E" East CHECKING #6103780 K -62340.781 126685.981 26868.85 91214.05 t,em Lie, MN 55110-5231 I N BANK BALANCE DEBIT CREDIT 91214.05 BALANCE TRAM ITRANICHECKSTO DATE # DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR 91214.05 91214.05 Run Date: 10/09/2006 at 11:47:12 AM E-Ff7e: Chccking4Bonds06.123 Page 1 Premier Bank 1VTill1jesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. GTcMEER FDIC Page: 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE 6103780 SERVICE 2004 DEBIT FUND Account Number: 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E Statement Date: 9/29/06 GEM TAPE MN 55110-5231 Checks/Items Enclosed: 0 86 NOW OFFERING Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposlt Capture NON PROFIT PRENIIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE - SERVICE 2004 DEBIT FUND Beginning Balance 9101106 Deposits / Misc Credits 0 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 0 ** Ending Balance 9/30/06 Service Charge Average Balance Average Collected Balance M3.ni mm Balance Acct 6103780 91,214.05 .00 .00 91,214.05 ** .00 91,214 91,214 91,214 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION