Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 11-20 CC PACKETCITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CANVASS BOARD 13 NOVEMBER 2006 The Election Canvass Board of the City of Gem Lake was convened by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 13 November 2006, at 7:00 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Council members Rasmussen, Bosak, Schilling and Watson, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were Ken Kirchoff, Barry Zevan,Tom and Lenore Bolfing, Gretchen and Dale Swomley, Bob and Kim Uzpen, Jim Lindner, Walter Powell and Justin Gese.. The results of the General Election held on Tuesday, 07 November 2006, were presented by Magnuson and are attached hereto. Motion by Schilling and Second by Watson to accept and certify the results of the General Election as presented were unanimously approved. There being no further business, Mayor Emeott adjourned the Canvass Board at 7:08 PM. AUTHORED: 14 November 2006 APPROVED: 20 November 2006 ATTEST: Frederic C. M n on City Clerk ATTEST: aul R. Emeott Mayor efile: election\2006eneralElection/CanvassBoardMinutes.wpd CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 13 NOVEMBER 2006 Mayor Emeott convened the November City Council Workshop at 7:22 PM in the first floor meeting room of 1 Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Schilling, Rasmussen and Watson were present. Also present were City Clerk Magnuson, Mark Sweet of the Business Development Committee, City Engineer Justin Gese, City Intern Wally Powell. Also present were Ken Kirchoff, Barry Zevan, Jim Lindner, Bob and Kim Anderson-Uzpen and Dale and Gretchen-Artig Swomley, Tom and Lenore Bolfing. Mr. Magnuson then made opening remarks regarding the efforts to create a vision for the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and indicated that tonight's workshop will combine with the December workshop to create the vision statement for the Comprehensive Plan. To assist in preparing the vision statement, Magnuson noted that the City Planner advises there is no single format that is correct and that in addition to a single vision statement (macro or big picture), it is often necessary to create vision statements for each district within the City. To this end, the City Council has received a packet of three examples of vision statements plus the existing vision statement from the Gem Lake 1997 Plan (Section 4.0). Mayor Emeott and the Council then discussed openly with the community the many individual visions that have been discussed including recreational open space, natural open space, city parks and trails, regional trails and future development. It was determined early that based upon the current conditions in Gem Lake that the City should be considered fully developed with less than 15% of the City's total land available for development. Discussion of how this would be determined and it was generally agreed that the total land mass of Gem Lake at 721 acres should be the denominator for the equation. Hence, by adding the two Hansen parcels on County E at 35.64 acres to the Hoffman Corner parcels at 14.57 acres, approximately 50.21 acres are currently available for development. The further addition of up to 35 acres to be developed by Kunin and Hoeschler brings the total to 85.21 acres. When the 85.21 acres is divided by 721 acres, the equivalent is 11.8% or less than the 15% required for fully developed communities in the Metropolitan Council Planning Handbook. Mayor Emeott noted, however, that these final developments will accelerate the total housing in the City substantially beyond the 4 units per year that was predicted in 1997. It is possible that at full development (100%), housing units in Gem, Lake could total over 500 or more than 3 times or current inventory. It was noted that the bulk of this housing would be contained in a mixed use development of the current retail district. There was general concurrence that the density allowed in a mixed use development in the current retail district will ^� assist th community in maintaining much of the current status of the residential community. Magnuson indicated perhaps a map showing all the new changes should be created to provide for the basis of a "macro" vision of the community as it unfolds. Using this as a tool, an overall ("macro") statement could evolve followed by more specific visions for each district ("micros"). There was general concurrence this would be a helpful tool and the Clerk was charged with creating same as soon as possible for use by both the Planning Commission, City Council and Intern as part of the community surveys. Both intern Powell and Engineer Gese felt this could facilitate the process although Ms. Swomley expressed some concern that it might lead residents to conclusions. Emeott supported the use indicating pictures stimulate the visual process and tend to facilitate discussion. As the Planning Commission is primarily charged with development of the 2008 Comp Plan, it was suggested that development of the vision statement might be facilitated if worked on jointly by the City Council and Planning Commission. To this end, it was determined to be in the best interest of the community for the two bodies to meet collectively on 04 December 2006 and have 05 December 2006 also available so time constraints can be lifted. Magnuson was ordered to publish same. Following additional discussion, Mayor Emeott thanked all in attendance for coming this evening. The workshop was adjourned at 9:04 pm. AUTHORED: 13 November 2006 APPROVED: 20 November 2006 ATTEST: ATTEST: Frederic C. ag n on PaWRU'ott eCVII� City Clerk Mayor efile: Minutes\2006\206novwm.wpd J Page 1 of 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 13 NOVEMBER 2006 J Mayor Emeott convened the November City Council Workshop at 7:22 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Schilling, Rasmussen and Watson were present. Also present were City Clerk Magnuson, Mark Sweet of the Business Development Committee, City Engineer Justin Gese, City Intern Wally Powell. Also present were Ken Kirchoff, Barry Zevan, Jim Lindner, Bob and Kim Anderson-Uzpen and Dale and Gretchen-Artig Swomley, Tom and Lenore Bolfing. Mr. Magnuson then made opening remarks regarding the efforts to create a vision for the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and indicated that tonight's workshop will combine with the December workshop to create the vision statement for the Comprehensive Plan. To assist in preparing the vision statement, Magnuson noted that the City Planner advises there is no single format that is correct and that in addition to a single vision statement (macro or big picture), it is often necessary to create vision statements for each district within the City. To this end, the City Council has received a packet of three examples of vision statements plus the existing vision statement from the Gem Lake 1997 Plan (Section 4.0). Mayor Emeott and the Council then discussed openly with the community the many individual visions that have been discussed including recreational open space, natural open space, city parks and trails, regional trails and future development. It was determined early that based upon the current conditions in Gem Lake that the City should be considered fully developed with less than 15% of the City's total land available for development. Discussion of how this would be determined and it was generally agreed that the total land mass of Gem Lake at 721 acres should be the denominator for the equation. Hence, by adding the two Hansen parcels on County E at 35.64 acres to the Hoffman Corner parcels at 14.57 acres, approximately 50.21 acres are currently available for development. The further addition of up to 35 acres to be developed by Kunin and Hoeschler brings the total to 85.21 acres. When the 85.21 acres is divided by 721 acres, the equivalent is 11.8% or less than the 15% required for fully developed communities in the Metropolitan Council Planning Handbook. Mayor Emeott noted, however, that these final developments will accelerate the total housing in the City substantially beyond the 4 units per year that was predicted in 1997. It is possible that at frill development (100%), housing units in Gem, Lake could total over 500 or more than 3 times or current inventory. It was noted that the bulk of this housing would be contained in a mixed use development of the current retail district. There was general concurrence that the density allowed in a mixed use development in the current retail district will assist th community in maintaining much of the current status of the residential community. Magnuson indicated perhaps a map showing all the new changes should be created to provide for the basis of a "macro" vision of the community as it unfolds. Using this as a tool, an overall ("macro") statement could evolve followed by more specific visions for each district ("micros"). There was general concurrence this would be a helpful tool and the Clerk was charged with creating same as soon as possible for use by both the Planning Commission, City Council and Intern as part of the community surveys. Both intern Powell and Engineer Gese felt this could facilitate the process although Ms. Swomley expressed some concern that it might lead residents to conclusions. Emeott supported the use indicating pictures stimulate the visual process and tend to facilitate discussion. As the Planning Commission is primarily charged with development of the 2008 Comp Plan, it was suggested that development of the vision statement might be facilitated if worked on jointly by the City Council and Planning Commission. To this end, it was determined to be in the best interest of the community for the two bodies to meet collectively on 04 December 2006 and have 05 December 2006 also available so time constraints can be lifted. Magnuson was ordered to publish same. Following additional discussion, Mayor Emeott thanked all in attendance for coming this evening. The workshop was adjourned at 9:04 pm. AUTHORED: 13 November 2006 APPROVED: 20 November 2006 ATTEST: ATTEST: Frederic C. agnu n Paul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor efile: Minutes\2006\206novwm.wpd Page 1 of 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING 20 NOVEMBER 2006 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 20 November 2006 at 7:06 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Schilling, Rasmussen and Watson were present. Also present were City Clerk Magnuson, City Attorney Oliver, Councilor -Elect Gretchen Artig-Swomley, Committee Chair Mark Sweet, Cathy Carey (Town Life Magazine), Mary Bauer (Pioneer Press), Kimberly Anderson-Uzpen, Bob Uzpen, BethHerzog, Tim Woller, JerryThomson, CliffNadeau, Tari Nadeau, Ken Lorenz, Kathy Brown, Chuck Granlund and Cheryl Granlund. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, the following actions were taken: 1) Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to approve the minutes of the 16 October 2006 Public Hearing for Herzog CUP was unanimously approved: 2) Motion by Bosak, Second by Watson to approve the minutes of the 16 October 2006 City Council Meeting was unanimously approved; 3) Motion by Watson, Second by Rasmussen to approve the minutes of the 13 November2006 Public Hearing on2006 Road improvements Assessments was unanimously approved; 4) Motion by Rasmussen, Second by Schilling to approved the minutes of the duly noticed and convened meeting of the Gem Lake Canvass Board was unanimously approved; 5) Motion by Schilling, Second by Watson to approve the minutes of the 13 November 2006 City Council workshop was unanimously approved; 6) Motion by Rasmussen, Second by Bosak to approve the 20 November 2006 agenda as amended was unanimously approved. Motion by Schilling, Second by Bosak to approve the Consent Agenda was unanimously approved. RESOLVED. Motion by Bosak, Second by Watson to empower the City Clerk to apply for a 2007 Score Grant with Ramsey County and to execute all necessary documents attendant to same was unanimously approved. Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to approve Resolution No. 2006-41 providing for execution of the Joint Powers Agreement with VLAWMO for the period 2007 through 2011 by the Mayor and City Clerk was unanimously approved. RESOLVED. Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to select the City of White Bear Lake as the primary supplier of water based upon the City Water Plan developed and submitted by SEH, Inc. Discussion followed with recommendation of staff that the City of Vadnais Heights be considered a secondary supplier of water as pipes are already in place at 1493 and 1201 East County Road E that could be reconfigured with valves for emergencies. Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to amend motion per staff recommendation and select White Bear Lake as primary supplier of water and Vadnais Heights as secondary/emergency supplier was unanimously approved. Magnuson then presented his supplement to the consent agenda responding to Councilor Watson's 6 points as attached. Relative to the items shown, discussion was: 1) Magnuson reported he has communicated with City Attorney Oliver and amendment to our local ordinance will be required; 2) Mr. Sweet has spoken with Mr. Rafferty regarding the $500,000 budget limitations and Mr. Rafferty concurs that this can be accomplished; 3) Magnuson indicated he has spoken with Tony Carlson and through Carlson to Ken Wilson who has indicated no intention of selling or developing the Gem Lake Hills property. Mr. Watson asked that the a conclusion to the matter be pursued and notice sent to Mr. Wilson within two (2)weeks; 4) as reported; 5) as reported; 6) the Clerk was asked to prepare a recommendation for January, 2007. Additional discussion followed regarding the speed and traffic flow along Goose Lake Road with recommendations for flashing lights at golf course. Mr. And Mrs. 6ran Iund complained regarding both the volume and speed of traffic on the road. The Council reminded them this is a Ramsey County road and the City Clerk provided several contacts at Ramsey County for them to speak with. RESOLVED. Motion by Schilling, Second by Bosak to appoint Rafferty Rafferty Toilefson and Lindeke as project architects for the Community Hall project and send thanks to all who submitted was unanimously approved Discussion ofcurrent work on the Comprehensive Municipal Plan work followed with strong support ofthe previous plan as well written and a need for an open palate approach so the communities feelings are truly represented. Relative to the creation of a "vision statement", it was determined that the Gem Lake City Council and Planning Commission should meet jointly on Monday, 04 December 2006 and provide for extension of the meeting to Tuesday, 05 December 2006. Page 1 of 5 1 Due to scheduling conflicts, the regular December, 2006 meeting of the City Council was ordered rescheduled to Thursday, 21 December 2006, and the Clerk was ordered to publish the change. ADJOURN: Motion by Watson, Second by Schilling to adjourn at 9:06 PM was unanimously approved. AUTHORED: 28 November 2006 APPROVED: 21 December 2006 ATTEST: _ ATTEST: Frederic C. M ,nuson Paul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor efile: Minutes\2006\207novm.wpd Page 2 of 5 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-40 13 NOVEMBER 2006 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLE AS PREPARED BY THE CITY CLERK FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-01 AND ORDERING SAME FORWARDED TO RAMSEY COUNTY FOR ASSESSMENT AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY BENEFITTED AND FOR COLLECTION COMMENCING WITH PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE IN 2007. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake did duly order Public Improvement No 2006-01 which included the patching and overlay of ig Fox Road, Little Fox Lane, and Haven Lane and the patching and seal coating of Tessier Road; and WHEREAS, said work has been completed in accordance with the contract for the work as certified by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the final costs for Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane have been determined to be $175,523.06 for the roadway reconstruction portion of the project with 19 benefitted property units for an assessment of $9,238.06 per benefitted property unit as assessment #37070610 (a/k/a 2006BigFoxLittleFoxRoadImprovements); and WHEREAS, the final costs for Haven Lane have been determined to be $48,409.48 for the roadway reconstruction portion of the project with 7 benefitted property units for an assessment of $6,915.64 per benefitted property unit as assessment #37070611 (a/k/a 2006HavenRoadlmprovements); and WHEREAS, the final costs for Tessier Road have been determined to be $19,508.30 for the roadway reconstruction portion of the project with 7 benefitted property units for an assessment of $2,786.90 per benefitted property unit as assessment #37070612 (a/k/a 2006TessierRoadImprovements); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake has held a duly noticed public hearing for the purpose of presenting the final costs and assessments to the benefitted parties and receiving the public's input regarding the project; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby order the City Clerk to certify the assessments herein described to Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue for assessment against real property as shown and for collection commencing with taxes payable in the year 2007; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the term of the assessment shall be ten (10) years and the rate of interest for the assessment shall be set at five (5.9%) percent with said interest calculated by Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue as simple interest on the unpaid balance of the assessment as of November 15 annually. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Bosak and was supported by Councilor Rasmussen and dared .,d, )led based unnn the fnllowin¢ vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON RASMUSSEN I SCHILLING BOSAK' VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date tirst written. �s�ea a. -AV"-low �3 ,�� 2006 Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy WA c-file: resolution\2006\no2006-40 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2006-41 20 NOVEMBER-2006 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PARTICIPATION IN A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AMONG THE UNITS OF GOVERNMENT COMPRISING THE VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. WHEREAS, the constituent units of government comprising the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization entered into a Joint Powers Agreement to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act in September of 1983; and WHEREAS, the governmental units have now agreed that certain amendment to that document are necessary; and WHEREAS, said Joint Powers Agreement will expire at the end of 2006; Now, Therefore Be It RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute Joint Powers Agreement reestablishing the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization through December 31, 2011. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was declared ado ted nasea NAME a poll Luc Ivii�iwii EMEOTT .�.�. WATSON RASMUSSEN SCHILLING BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the "ity C;OUticll of me I,IIV OI tJem Luke vu uic uaw iuo- .••..�...•. �xed �. ==20�otiem,2006 Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Date Certified Copy e-file: resolution\200fto200641 Telephone: ( 651) 426 - 6443 Wk 5M45=109% Q* Ckd CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com Pau/&meal` 9V,2yar jJ 4 Facsimile: ( 651) 426 - 6444 c waa Cab/a19 ATM- "#W Response to Chuck Watson's email of 11/20/2006. This is supplemental to the Consent Agenda. Chuck, 1. There were actually six items on the list you gave me. This can serve as a supplement to my Consent Agenda. The items are as follows: 1. Discussion on changing Mayor's term to 4 years. I have referenced the appropriate statute and asked Trevor to identify the procedure so we can discuss and take action all at once. Have not received response yet from Trevor. 2. Discussion on proposed City Hall project. We have it on our agenda for tonight with Rafferty's recommendation. You asked: 1) Can we do it for S500K?; and 2) What's our obligation if we walk away?. These should be a part of tonight's discussion of selecting Rafferty. 3. Golf course rezoning. Spoke with Tony and while there doesn't seem to be any rsistance, we need to consult Pat Kelly regarding procedure. Ken Wilson is in Hawaii for the winter although Tony is available. We should discuss all open space. I finally found a way to contact Eugene Newcome although he was stiffer than a hoot when I called. All open space should be considered at once. 4. Discussion of bringing sewer along Tousley's north line. We have determined between Met Council and SEH that we have more than adequate sewer capacity already in the street at Brian's SE corner (200' east). All the sewer capacity from the RB district will also be redirected to this area. A formal report is forthcoming. 5. Where do we stand on the Residential Mixed Use Ordinance amendments. See Lindner notes and ask planning commission. I'm not working on it. 6. Garbage Hauling Program. I simply have not had time to dedicate to this due to elections, assessments, McNulty permits for Shirley, Met Council and SEH meetings, City Hall meetings and other projects. I will try to work on this before Christmas. CIIT?TY OF GEM LAKE 9" F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk efite: Stitt Re1)(srt061120b.wpd ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 %& 9%nuson C/* Ced CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com `tau/&eol,( 9low/- DATE: 20 November 2006 FROM: Fritz Magnuson TO: Mayor Emeott & City Council RE: Staff Report For Consent Agenda Facsimile: ( 651) 426 - 6444 &ia6 Lob/e/Z 91' aoziri Gentlemen, The following is my report for the period 17 October 2006 through 17 November 2006: 1. PLANNING COMMISSION. The Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting were sent in advance. 2. POLICE. The Contract Cities Sheriff's Group met Thursday, 16 Nov 2006. Mounds View has asked for support of a legislative initiative for Administrative Fine Ordinances. I indicated our support for same as did most of the Cities. I also indicated we should develop a cohesive Administrative Fines Ordinance for all to adopt. Mounds View has an excellent ordinance that could serve as the model. Others generally concurred. Discussion of performance evaluation followed. We meet in December with Sheriff Fletcher and any comments you wish delivered should be with me prior to 21 December 2006. f flow capacity in the City. SEH is finalizing and will be 3. MET COUNCIL. We now have excellent estimates o delivering a revised sewer map shortly. 4. LEGAL. 5. PUBLIC RELATIONS. Barry Zevan got excellent results on his last release. We were the second item on the WCCO 6:OOPM report the day of Barry's release. I meet with Cathy Carey for the first issue of Town Life on Wednesday morning. She has some ideas and simply needs information. 6. CITY HALL. The Community Hall Development Committee has met, reviewed RFP's for the City Hall and will make a recommendation at tonight's meeting. 7. JOB DESCRIPTION. 8. PUBLIC WORKS. All assessments for the road work for Public Improvement 2006-01 have been prepared and a preliminary report has been sent to Ramsey County. Three applications for deferment have been received from George Jungman, Al Schriber and Ken Jungman. As they all meet the criteria, they should be approved. Several assessments have already been paid and accounts at Premier Bank have been established to receive funds. 9. WATER PLAN. Mr. Norton recommends we make a decision on the plan tonight. While the White Bear Lake plan will most likely be triggered by the RB redevelopment, we could add an emergency codicil to the plan which calls for water from Vadnais Heights to Hartford with those connections eventually becoming emergency connections. 10. FINANCE. We are trying to schedule a finance meeting next week to discuss alternatives to emergency debt financing that could provide substantially longer repayment schedules and, thus, ease the tax burden on the residents. 11. SEWER. The Sewer contractor has been delayed by a shortage of meters in White Bear Lake. We have extended the deadline for completion to accommodate the problem. 12. ELECTIONS. Canvass results have been approved and minutes of same will be available for approval tonight. 13. Treasurer's Report attached. 36 calls regarding tax statements received and responded to. Final decision due on 20 December 2006 will be preceded by a recommendation from legal and financial consultants. 14. Accounts Payable attached. Respectfully Submitted, CHITTY OF GEM LAKE F.C. "Fritz" Magnuson J efile: SiaffReport061120a.wpd CITY OF GEM LAKE MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT STATE GENERAL ELECTION 07 NOVEMBER 2006 We, the undersigned Judges of Election ofthe City of Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that at the State General Election held in that City Of Gem Lake on Tuesday, 07 November 2006, between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, the following named persons received the number of votes set opposite their respective names for the fr, t,.,..,t., , ;t- OFFICE OF MAYOR (2 Year Term) VOTES RECEIVED Paul R. Emeott (Incumbent) ELECTION WINNER-1 155 Blank Ballot Votes 46 WRITE-INS VOTES (See Attached) 24 Undervote / Overvote TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 225 OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL (4 Year Term) VOTES RECEIVED Gretchen Artig-Swomley ELECTION WINNER-* 103 Charles Watson ELECTION WINNER-+ 140 Richard W. Bosak 93 Blank Ballot Votes 15 WRITE-IN VOTES (See Attached) 4 Undervote / Overvote 80 TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 225 The following summary restates Write -In votes for local offices as shown on the ballot of General Election for 07 a'_t or )nnr, MAYOR # VOTES CITY COUNCIL # VOTES Charles Watson 7 Jody Lorenz 1 Dan Mayer 1 James Lindner 1 James Lindner 1 Tom Kapsner 1 Steve Turnbull 2 Scott Tessier 1 Debra Larsen 3 Bryce Menk I Tim Heil I Jim Segermark I Gretchen Artig-Swomley 2 Fritz Magnuson I Other (As non-residents or unqualified) 4 Other (As non-residents or unqualified) TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST 24 TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST 4 Page 1 of 3 Ij CITY OF GEM LAKE MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT STATE GENERAL ELECTION 07 NOVEMBER 2006 SUMMARY OF ELECTION DAY STATISTICS Number of voters registered and on the polling place roster at 7:00 am 281 Number of new voter registration cards filled out on election day (yellow receipts) 19 Number of preregistered voters signing the roster (blue receipts) 220 Number of accepted regular absentee ballots (envelopes with black ink) 5 Number of accepted overseas/military absentee ballots (envelopes with red ink) 0 Number of accepted Presidential Absentee Ballots (envelopes with blue ink) 0 TOTAL VOTING IN THIS STATE GENERAL ELECTION 225 NOTE 1: Of the Absentee Ballots received, two (2) could not be read by the counter and voter intent could not be determined. Hence, no duplicate ballots were prepared. Total ballot count was 227 of which two (2) were declared spoiled. Page 2 of 3 CITY OF GEM LAKE MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT , ti ELECTION JUDGE & CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL GENERAL ELECTION, 02 NOVEMBER 2004 ELECTION JUDGE APPROVAL We, the duly appointed and sworn undersigned Judges Of Election, do hereby certify that all City Ballots cast in the State General Election were carefully and properly tallied electronically as well as piled, checked and counted and that the number of votes marked opposite the respective names of the candidates shows the number of votes so cast and the ballots cast and related reports of election activity have been securely stored at Ramsey County election headquarters. The American and Minnesota Flags were displayed on suitable staffs in and outside (American Flag only) the polls Aurino the hnnrc of vntinv from 7-00 am through 8:00 Dill. ATTEST OFFICIALS NAME OFFICIALS TITLE SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL Molly M. Bonin Chief Election Judgeb 'yam Kristina M. Swanson Election Judge J Z L G. �,-� 1 .� y �-�+--Z-I Dawn R. Segennark Election Judge Gabrielle C. Blake Election Judge Hilary R. Magnuson Election Judge -� CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL We, the undersigned and the legally constituted Canvass Board and Mayor of the City of Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota, having convened on 08 November 2004, do hereby certify that the results of an election held in that City Of Gem Lake on 02 November 2004 as presented herein are a true and accurate representation of the ballots cast at said election and that those persons elected for the offices shown shall be installed in said offices at the first meeting of the Citv Council of the Citv of Gem Lake in January. 2003. OFFICIALS NAME OFFICIALS TITLE SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL Paul Erneott Mayor r Tom Rasmussen Canvass Board Hutch Schilling Canvass Board Charles Watson Canvass Board Richard Bosak Canvass Board ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake acting in their capacity as the Election Canvass Board and duly convened on Monday, the 13`h Jay or rvovemocr 2-vvo. w-e� -6 '/� 2006 Dated At Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55110 13 November 2006 Certif ieb CopB e-file: Election\2006\GeneralElection\ElectionSummary.wpd e-file: Election\2006\GeneralElection\ElectionSummary.pdf Page 3 of 3 CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING 13 NOVEMBER 2006 A duly noticed public hearing was convened before the Gem Lake City Council on 13 November 2006 at 7:08 pm in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at 1493 East County Road "E" in the City of Gem Lake for the purpose of receiving public comment on the proposed assessment of costs of work for Public Improvement Project No. 2006-01 (PIP2006-01) which includes patching and reconstruction of Big Fox Road, Little Fox Lane and Haven lane as well as patching and seal coating of Tessier Road. Mr. Magnuson presented the final accounting for the project indicating a slight variance from costs identified in the public hearing Costs identified in the public hearing notice were stated to be $241,525.83 with allocations to Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane of $174,142.33, to Haven Lane of $48,028.67 and to Tessier Road of $19,354.84. Actual final costs for the entire project are $243,440.83 with allocations to Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane of $175,523.06, to Haven Lane of $48,409.48 and to Tessier Road of $19,508.30. Mr. Magnuson noted that the final notice for the project includes the corrected costs as well as financing information offering City financing at an interest rate of 5.9% over ten (10) years. Mr. Magnuson also advised of provisions for deferment of the assessment as provided for by State Statutes and indicated he has had one request for same. When asked by Dr. Anderson-Uzpen, Magnuson explained that he believed the deferment ran, with interest, until there was a change in fee title on the property at which time said assessment and interest became due and that said assessment took precedence over all other claims against the property. Mr. Kirchoff asked regarding the curbing installed and was advised that a certain amount of line of sight variation was consistent with the application and that the contractor who also serves as the City snow plowing contractor has been advised that if he breaks it, he fixes it. No comment from the City Council was received. Motion by Bosak, Second by Rasmussen to adopt Resolution No. 2006-40 approving the assessment as presented and ordering same to certify same to Ramsey County for collection was unanimously approved. The Public Hearing was adjourned by Mayor Emeott at 7:22 PM. AUTHORED: 14 November 2006 APPROVED: 20 November 2006 ATTEST: ATTEST: Frederic C. Magnuson aul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor efile: Minutes\Hearings\2006\PublicHearingNo2006-04.wpd efile: PIP2006-01Wssess\PublicHearinNog2006-04.wpd Page 1 of 1 Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 91kV7Wi'% Q* CIO'( CITY OF GEM LA K E Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com �aa/Fmea/�' 9%yoi owl Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 &ia6 al&alz VI-raffInr PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 2006-37C 13 November 2006 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDED ASSESSMENT FOR 2006 BIG FOX ROAD, LITTLE FOX LANE, TESSIER ROAD AND HAVEN LANE STREET IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2006-01. Dear Resident, The original public notice for the public hearing on amounts to be assessed for Gem Lake Public Improvement Project No. 2006-01 included incomplete information in that an additional invoice remained outstanding for the project and was received after the notice had been prepared and sent. Hence, our accounting mandated we amend the assessment to include these additional costs. While the amount was minor, we are obligated to identify the amended cost to you. The proposed amended assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk and remains open to public inspection. Property ID # Property Address Property Owner 1 Property Owner 2 Owner Address Assessment For Assessment No Assessment Amount Original Estimate Notified Amount Amended Amount FIELD(pin) F IELD(propertyaddress) FIELD(owner 1) FIELD(owner2) FIELD(street) FIELD(city), FIELD(st) FIELD(zip) FIELD(assesstype) FIELD(assessnumber) FIELD(assessvaluel ) FIELD(assessvalue2) FIELD(assessvalue3) The area proposed to be assessed is all real property abutting or served by Big Fox Road, Little Fox Lane, Tessier Road and Haven Lane. The work included patching, aggregate base, and bituminous surfacing construction for Big Fox Road, Little Fox Lane and Haven Lane. The work also included patching, and hot oil sealing for Tessier Road as first described. The total amended amount proposed to be assessed is $243,440.83 which includes: Big Fox Road & Little Fox Lane Original Assessment #37070610 Amount $174,142.33 Amended Assessment #37070610 Amount $175,523.06 Haven Lane Original Assessment #37070611 Amount $ 48,028.67 Amended Assessment #37060611 Amount $ 48,409.48 Tessier Road Original Assessment #37070612 Amount $ 19,354.84 Amended Assessment #37070612 Amount $ 19,508.30 Written or oral objections by any owner of property to be assessed will be considered at the hearing. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted by the City Council unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. All objections to the assessments not received at the assessment hearing in the manner prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Secoon 429.061 are waived, unless the failure to object at the assessment hearing is due to a reasonable cause. '-PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 2006-37C 13 November 2006 An owner of real property to be assessed may appeal the assessment to the district court of Ramsey County pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person sixty-five (65) years of age or older or for a disabled person for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments and who has a gross annual income of $26,900 to $44,650 adjusted for family size. Complete details of deferment procedures are available from the undersigned. The notice ofthis hearing published in the White Bear Press newspaper did not contain the amount to be specifically assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land which is the amount shown on page 1. You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this assessment. You may, in any year, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount ofthe assessment remai ni ng unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made on or before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. if you decide not to prepay the entire assessment within thirty (30) days of adopting the assessment, the rate of interest that will apply is five (5.00%) percent simple interest per year over a period of ten (10) years. The right to partially prepay the assessment is available and described as follows: During the 30-day period following the adoption by the city council of the assessment roll in a local improvement proceeding conducted under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, but prior to the certification of the assessment to Ramsey County, the owner of property specially assessed in the proceeding may pay to the City of Gem Lake City Clerk, without interest, any portion of the special assessment not less than one -hundred ($100) dollars. The remaining balance of the special assessment is to then be paid over ten (10) years at five point nine (5.90%) percent simple interest per year. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF GEM LAKE mar _,� F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk efile: PublicNoticeNo.2005-37c.wpd CITY OF GEM LAKE \Ak AV Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Telephone: (651) 426 - 6443 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com NOTICE OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2006-01 FIELD(ownerl ) FIELD(owner2) FIELD(street) FIELD(city), FIELD(st) FIELD(zip) ASSESSED PROPERTY: ASSESSMENT TYPE: YOUR ASSESSMENT NUMBER: YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT: Dear Property Owner, PIN #FIELD(pin) FIELD(propertyaddress) FIELD(assesstype) FIELD(assessnumber) FIELD(assessvalue3) nr�n Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 &1176 c4ian grnasvrrei 15 November 2006 Following a duly noticed and convened public hearing, the Gem Lake City Council voted unanimously to assess all benefitted property owners for the street improvements made at BiG Fox Road, Little Fox Lane, Haven Lane and Tessier Road as part of Public Improvement Project 2006-0 1. The amount shown above has been certified to Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue as the principal amount of the assessment. We have also notified Ramsey County that the assessment may be financed over a ten (10) year period at a simple interest rate of five point nine (5.90%) percent. Please note that first year interest will be calculated from November 21, 2006 to December 31, 2007 if the assessment is not paid in full prior to December 21, 2006. Upon receipt of this notice you will have several payment options. 1) Ifyou choose, you may pay the entire sewer assessment amount above to the City of Gem Lake with no interest if received by the City Clerk on or before December 21, 2006. In this case, no assessment against your property will be necessary and no interest will be charged. 2) You may also choose to pay any portion ofthe sewer assessment amount above and the balance will be fmanced and assessed to your property taxes. 3) You may choose to pay nothing immediately and the entire sewer assessment amount above will be financed and assessed to your property taxes. 4) You may, at any time during the ten (10) year finance period, make additional principal payments of any amount against your obligation which will reduce the sewer assessment balance and the interest to be charged in the subsequent year. Please note that additional principal payments made must be received by Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue on or before November 15th each year to effectively reduce interest for the subsequent year. For BIG FOX ROAD and LITTLE FOX LANE residents, if you elect to finance the entire assessment, the table below shows the approximate amount you will owe each year. YEAR May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance YEAR May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance 1 $765 04 $765.04 $8,314.25 6 $598.16 $598.16 $3,695.22 2 $707.17 $707.17 $7,390.45 7 $570.91 $570.91 $2,771.42 3 $679.92 $679.92 $6,466.64 8 $543.66 $543.66 $1,847.61 4 $652.67 $652.67 $5,542.84 9 $516.41 $516.41 $923.81 5 $625.42 $625.42 $4,619.03 10 $489.16 $489.15 $0 The total of payments in this example will be $12,297.03. 21 November 2006 2006 Road Improvements Assessment For HAVEN LANE residents, if you elect to finance the entire assessment, the table below shows the approximate amour lL VULI W111 YEAR VWV V!! May 15th f'a"n nt Nu%,:,, r 15th Pxvment Assessment Balance YEAR May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance 1 $572.71 $572.71 $6,224.08 6 $447.79 $447.79 $2,766.26 2 $529.39 $529.39 $5,532 51 7 $427.39 $427.39 $2,074.69 3 $508.99 $508.99 $4,840.95 8 $406.99 $406.99 $1,383.13 4 $488.59 $488.59 $4,149.38 9 $386.58 $386.58 $691.56 5 $468.19 $468.19 $3,457.82 10 $366.18 $366.18 $0 The total of payments in this example will be $9,205.60. For TESSIER ROAD residents, ifyou elect to finance the entire assessment, the table below shows the approximate amour IL YUU W111VWVV YEAR May 15th P:nmcnt November 15th Payment Assessment Balance YEAR May 15th !'aynienr November 15th Payment Assessment Balance 1 $230.79 $230.79 $2,508.21 6 $180.45 $180.45 $1,114.76 2 $213.34 $213.34 $2,229.52 7 $172.23 $172.23 $836.07 3 $205.12 $205.12 $1,950.83 8 $164.01 $164.01 $557.38 4 $196.89 $196.89 $1,672.14 9 $155.79 $155,79 $278.69 5 $188.67 $188.67 $1,393.45 10 $147.57 $147.57 $0 The total of payments in this example will be $3,709.72. In the event you wish to pay the entire assessment and avoid any interest charges, please remember that your payment must be received on or before December2l, 2006. As always, if you have any questions don't hesitate to call. Regards, CITY OF GEM LAKE 3" F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk efile: PublicNoticeNo2006 40.wpd CITY OF GEM LAKE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2006-01 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS r:_ r. __ n...-a *** i ."i L'.... I a"a *** Taccinr Rnad *** Haven Lane COST INCURRED BY COSTS INCURRED FOR COSTS T.A. Schifaky & Sons. Inc. Contractor for Reconstruction of Streets $157,826.14 Allied Blacktop Co. Contractor For Oil/Rock on Tessier Road $4,915.00 SEK Inc. Engineering & Project Managnnent 53,476.00 Ehlers & AsWcia m Inc. Bond Financial Consultant 5,000.00 Kennedy & Graven Bond Counsel 3,500.00 Wells Fam Bond Discount Bond Issuer 4,750.00 Provision For Prepaid Interest - 02/01/2007 Bond Reserve Required by Law 4,623.69 For Prepaid Interest - 08/01/2007 Bond Reserve Reored by Law 5,267.50 _Provision City of Gem Lake Project Assessment & Accounting Staff Time 4,082.50 SUB -TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $243,440.83 ORIGINAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS 245,000.00 COST DIFFERENTIAL OVER / (UNDER) ESTIMATE ($1,559.1 run: 11/06/2006 at 07:37:36 AM Page 1 of I efile: ProjectCostsl.123 O Z N m (0 a_ 3 O Z J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 o m_ 0 2-2- 0 0 N n n v v v v n v n v �n �n �n �n v, �n n� �n < a w a F a a W a a d w F d d a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a WO 7w Cw7 Cw7 0 Cw7 Cw7 0 Cw7 0 Cw7 Cw7 3 Cw7 Cw7 3 (7 Cw7 I'll "Fi Cw7I OW 1 Cw7 Cw7 (w7 Cw7 Cw7 Cw7 Cw7 w w > za za z a z a z a zzzzzzz00000P92Qppp F X X X X X X X X X a s z w w w w w° w w w N o 0 00 0 0 0 wza F " ' " ww W RI � R1 a R1 R1 C] Ox 'x x x x x x x a a a a a F� F F F F F � Gq pq pp 1q CC m m m m m aq M f�'f NI M m m vI m R m ON m O, m O+ m O, m T m �o o'o o m o M M m G� m O� m m O. m m on Q. m n T M O N 8 O O ' O b O b O 'oO O 0\ O Q; O G� O o� O c� O C1 O 0+ om0 p 8 as 00 oo 40 oC oo ad 00 o d�!Qo� - - - - - - hNoro adNno oh[ o ohI o ohro ohN hoIN o Vndj' N H 6m9 of sm9 Am O, Q+ V QL 69 C�, c � 69 C�4? lo 9 FA 6-9 69 6N CON, 6n 9 cmN, FA 69 69 b9 vl�o3H 69 N � F � W a° (PG an PG w WW w W PG z pq E"' U W z F �Wj aW �A O OG Q a w Q wul z w O W W .Oa z c W�W o cOcGG ¢¢ w z o z z w U W qO A z O z 04 CU R¢1 C z z W W O C 5 U z W �a O w a y x O O w z 0cn w co a ¢ dA W O p A > r 5 o¢o WzW p�p X, WzW ti d ti Rw ua F 0a: x� A A w F- U A N m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O x x x x >< X x x x k w vc e c w c p F o o 0 0 0 0 e>> u m eo OD 00 0o tO o0 m m m m m m IN F LG R7 R1 W CA m W m f70 R1 PC R1 PG C1 x .'C x x x x� a .] a �-7 a F�-� F F F F F 3t O Vt m b y n m n n IDO O Vl �O vi N �D Vf n O O .-� 0 N 0 m �--� m O Vl .-� �n O �O O 00 O �O m n O O O Vl O Vl O cl W �p 1p 1p M m m to m M lD M M M M M M m m M m m O, m M m m m M m M m m M aM O N N N N N w 2 0 O 0 N O O O O O O o O to O m O O Vl O o N O o O O W O o m O 0 O o n O 0 M O o b O O 00 O o g 0 0 0 0 v 0 v 0 v 0 v o 0 0 v m O 0 m o 0 v o 0 O 0 o 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 v 0 0 v 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'a. N N N� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1-4N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N o N N o N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 0 m 00 N 0 o m m 00 N N o m ao N 0 m 00 N 0 m 00 N 0 m 00 N 0 m 00 N 0 m 0o N 0 0 m m ao r N N 0 m r N 0 m o0 N 0 m 00 N 0 m 0o N 0 m m N 0 m oo N 0 m ao N 0 m 00 N 0 m 00 N m 0o N M O N m ao N m 00 N m 00 N m 00 N m 00 N m 00 N m 1-4 m 00 N M 00 N m 00 N m 00 N O ri N N 69 Ofl � � 00 00 M N N 01 r, bs 6ss 43 � 6 oho ONi � O � 69 69 N64 W4 N 69 69 N N O O� C, 6N9 W 6M9 d9 O oo lri m p N 69 va 69 "' oho 0o O oMo v V�1^ 64 600 N �O 69 IA 6W9 64 %0 N o0 O v 7 0� M M •a 69 69 601 69 MP A M m 6�9 tom" `'D n bs 69 N v1 7 U1 .�. N 00 Vl M M O M a 7 �t 69 6s r w 69 69 O oo O N O M N 7 6O M 10, N 601A 6-9 613 CT w w Loom m.. ��... 0 Cl o p F o N 119 Q a C> h N 69 - Yl Vl W M va us 6r3 w 69 w a D ''•' o T .NN-� o 10 N Gn N >- n 10 00yN N 6H ER VI 69 Ls 6,49 bps Vi V1 00 �D W OT � M vi oo M b N 7 µ w 69 69 VI a v�i_ IT,, '� 10, v a 1 00 �p N O �" 69 69 69 69 M 10 C'4 V li I vMl � w us ^" N us 6A N o0 �D N 00 ID.�-'i N N Cn b on l6 a v N 10 Mw b O N 69 69 � 10 h O O al 7 b 69 69 �us Is rnrn.C.�. 10 U9 Gn a N n rn r ri w .-. o0 oo 6 'ri n N N Hs w 4s N� 64 69 01 M A W �� w 6Msw O w M 00 O I m m O M� OO N b-It 9 M vs va w w � n b � 7 � ryNry 7 1� 'a Vs 69 6M9 41 69 n -N0 10 W C,L6iN9 V9 Ifl 69 b b \R In � wrn na°Oc in 69 G4 N 1010, q 6 n wi ol ^ 6N4 his 69 N N M N N 69 69 69 /A w N C, �y oG o0 l� 10 m N N 69 to 69 69 O 01 M l- 01 O� 00 b N6Nn 69 6�9 w os m o rn" :: o h �c o r,�,�r%, r r W" CITY OF GEM LA K E Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Telephone: ( 651) 426 - 6443 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com NOTICE OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2006-01 FIELD(ownerl ) FIELD(owner2) FIELD(street) FIELD(city), FIELD(st) FIELD(zip) ASSESSED PROPERTY: ASSESSMENT TYPE: YOUR ASSESSMENT NUMBER: YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT: Dear Property Owner, PIN #FIELD(pin) FIELD(propertyaddress) FIELD(assesstype) FIELD(assessnumber) FIELD(assessvalue3) Facsimile: ( 651) 426 - 6444 C16V0 Ca6iol? gl-rmmei 21 November 2006 Following a duly noticed and convened public hearing, the Gem Lake City Council voted unanimously to assess all benefitted property owners for the street improvements made at BiG Fox Road, Little Fox Lane, Haven Lane and Tessier Road as part of Public Improvement Project 2006-0 1. The amount shown above has been certified to Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue as the principal amount of the assessment. We have also notified Ramsey County that the assessment may be financed over a ten (10) year period at a simple interest rate of five point nine (5.90%) percent. Please note that first year interest will be calculated from November 21, 2006 to December 31, 2007 if the assessment is not paid in full prior to December 21, 2006. Upon receipt of this notice you will have several payment options. 1) If you choose, you may pay the entire sewer assessment amount above to the City of Gem Lake with no interest if received by the City Clerk on or before December 21, 2006. In this case, no assessment against your property will be necessary and no interest will be charged. 2) You may also choose to pay any portion ofthe sewer assessment amount above and the balance will be financed and assessed to your property taxes. 3) You may choose to pay nothing immediately and the entire sewer assessment amount above will be financed and assessed to your property taxes. 4) You may, at any time during the ten (10) year finance period, make additional principal payments of any amount against your obligation which will reduce the sewer assessment balance and the interest to be charged in the subsequent year. Please note that additional principal payments made must be received by Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue on or before November 15th each year to effectively reduce interest for the subsequent year. For BIG FOX ROAD and LITTLE FOX LANE residents, if you elect to finance the entire assessment, the table below shows the approximate amount you will owe each year. YEAR May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance YEAR May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance 1 $765.04 $765.04 $8,314.25 6 $598.16 $598.16 $3,695.22 2 $707.17 $707.17 $7,390.45 7 $570.91 $570.91 $2,771.42 3 $679.92 $679.92 $6,466.64 8 $543.66 $543.66 $1,847.61 4 $652.67 $652.67 $5,542.84 9 $516.41 $516.41 $923.81 5 $625.42 $625.42 $4,619.03 10 $489.16 1 $489.15 $0 The total of payments in this example will be $12,297.03. 21 November 2006 2006 Road Improvements Assessment For HAVEN LANE residents, if you elect to finance the entire assessment, the table below shows the approximate amour 1L VVLI W111 YEAR VWV VUV>_a r May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance YEAR May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance 1 $572.71 $572.71 $6,224.08 6 $447.79 $447.79 $2,766 26 2 $529.39 $529.39 $5,532.51 7 $427.39 $427.39 $2,074.69 3 $508.99 $508.99 $4,840.95 8 $406.99 $406.99 $1,383.13 4 $488.59 $488.59 $4,149.38 9 $386.58 $386.58 $691.56 5 $468.19 $468.19 $3,457.82 10 $366.18 $366.18 $0 The total of payments in this example will be $9,205.60. For TESSIER ROAD residents, ifyou elect to finance the entire assessment, the table below shows the apinox i tnate amour. ' IL VVU W111 YEAR vwY V- y�.+++• May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance YEAR May 15th Payment November 15th Payment Assessment Balance 1 $230.79 $230.79 $2,508.21 6 $180.45 $180.45 $1,114.76 2 $213.34 $213.34 $2,229.52 7 $172.23 $172.23 $836 07 3 $205.12 $205.12 $1,950.83 8 $164.01 $164.01 $557.38 4 $196.89 $196.89 $1,672.14 9 $155.79 $155.79 $278.69 5 $188.67 $188.67 $1,393.45 10 $147.57 $147.57 $0 The total of payments in this example will be $3,709.72. In the event you wish to pay the entire assessment and avoid any interest charges, please remember that your payment must be received on or before December2l, 2006. As always, if you have any questions don't hesitate to call. Regards, CITY OF GEM LAKE 3" F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk IVA efile: Pub1icNoticeNo2006-40.wpd November 15, 2006 To: the member communities of the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO) From: Stephanie McNamara, Administrator Re: the FINAL Joint Powers Agreement for your consideration, approval and signature The attached Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) represents what is understood to be the consensus and direction of the last Work session of the Joint Powers task force. A 2-page summary of the JPA is also attached, highlighting changes from the last version is provide by North Oaks Mayor, Tom Watson. Process 1. This copy of the JPA has been the VLAWMO legal counsel, Roger Jensen to review of compliance with State Statute and Rules. His response has been requested within a week and will be forwarded to you as soon as it is received. If he recommends changes, new copies of the JPA will accompany Mr. Jensen's comments. 2. Two copies of the JPA are enclosed for you to consider. If any changes are critical, please forward them within a week. We are asking that the Joint Powers be authorized by all Members, conditioned upon legal review as needed. A sample Resolution of Approval for the VLAWMO JPA is also attached. Please return one signed copy of the JPA along with a Resolution of Approval immediately after your Council or Board considers it. VLAWMO MUST HAVE A FULLY EXECUTED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT IF IT IS TO CONTINUE PAST DECEMBER 31, 2006. 3. As soon as all six authorizations with signed JPA documents are received, seven original Joint Powers Agreements will be circulated to acquire all signatures on the same last page. When complete, your copy will be returned to you. Thank you for all of your hard work and patience. VLAWMO looks forward to 2007 and the opportunity to continue working with all of its Member communities. CITY OF NORTH OAKS MEMORANDUM THOMAS N. WATSON, MAYOR OFFICE 651-490-1653 FAx 651-415-2939 TO: Members of VLAWMO DATE: November 14, 2006 RE: VLAWMO Joint Powers Agreement - FINAL 11/6/06 (11/14/06) tnw version I prepared this summary to identify the changes made to complete this FINAL Copy of the Joint Powers Agreement. We have completed months of meetings and discussions, completed the review of many drafts, and provide a new Agreement that appears to add important features to the operation and management of VLAWMO. I am providing you with an outline of the key features of this FINAL Copy of the Agreement. Organization of Proposed New Agreement. We reorganized the current Agreement into an easier read, more logically organized proposed new Agreement. As a result, we added a section on "Financing" [Section VI], separated the organization of VLAWMO and the Board into two sections [Sections III and IV], and moved the Definitions section (with a few added definitions) from the Appendix to Section II. I included the following sections in this version: SECTION I General Purpose SECTION II Vadnais Lake Area Watershed SECTION III Definitions SECTION IV Organization of VLAWMO; Responsibilities Of Members SECTION V Organization of The Board Of Directors SECTION VI Responsibilities and Duties of The Board Of Directors 1 SECTION VII Responsibilities and Duties of Technical Commission 1 SECTION VIII Financing VLAWMO SECTION IX Duration Of This Joint Power Authority SECTION X Dissolution SECTION XI Counterparts We cleaned up all statutory and Minnesota rules references both as to language and consistency. 2. Governance of VLAWMO We have created a Board of Directors composed of elected officials from each Member municipality to manage VLAWMO, including approving and recommending operating and capital improvement budgets, oversight of watershed operations, and matters required of VLAWMO by state law and rule. The new governance is a two part organization replacing the single organization structure that reflects on the significance of managing surface waters in our watershed area. We have proposed this reorganization with stronger emphasis on (1) technical matters and (2) "business" matters. 3. Creation of a Technical Commission We have created a Technical Commission, accountable to the Board of Directors, composed of appointed representatives from each Member to provide the technical expertise for the planning and operations of VLAWMO. 4. Financing VLAWMO Section We added this section because of the references to budgets and financing VLAWMO were spread throughout the earlier version and the present Agreement. We have introduced the following substantive changes: CITY OF NORTH OAKS MEMORANDUM THOMAS N. WATSON, MAYOR OFFICE 651-490-1653 FAX 651-415-2939 a. Calendar and dates i. VLAWMO budgets prepared by July 1 rather than June 15; ii. Member budget meeting, with Members represented by an elected official, prior to October 15 to review and comment on the proposed budget and complete recommendation of the budgets to the Members; Note: Local governments are required to set their preliminary property tax levy, or September 15th; iii. Member budget meeting could take place anywhere between July 1 and Oct 151h, presumably between Sept 1 and Oct 15th, and after completing each Member's operating budget; b. Provide for final Member approval of the operating budget by Oct 15th rather than the previous 60 day period after June 15th or July 1st. c. Member Budget Meeting i. Considering the calendar and dates above, the change calls for at least one annual budget meeting of the elected official representatives of VLAWMO Members to complete the budget recommendation to the Members. d. Methods of Financing VLAWMO - no change from previous versions 5. Membership - compared to the present Agreement, the proposed new Agreement does not include the St Paul Regional Water Service/Board of Water Commissioners (SPRWS/BWC) as a Member. SPRWS/BWC has attended some of the planning meetings on the new Agreement, were asked to consider a proposal or make a proposal for their financial contribution to the operations of VLAWMO, and declined to reply and have not done so at the time I am writing this memo. 6. Financing allocation methods a. Present- 40% valuation, 40% area and 20% population b. Need to consider bases that relate to surface water management, such as impervious surfaces as a contributing factor for drainage and runoff. c. Special tax district - without state legislation, this is not a viable option at this time. 7. Dissolution a. The references for dissolution in the earlier versions are incorrect in my opinion and confuse the issue for application to MS Chap 103B for water management and MS Section 471.59 relative to forming a joint powers entity by agreement. i. Under Section 471.59, any Member choosing to leave the Agreement will cause the Agreement to be terminated. Units of local government can be participants without being Members, including having a financial responsibility and involved in technical matters. ii. The application of MS Chapter 103B is a separate matter with responsibilities for local units of government that can be organized and fulfilled with a WMO under a joint powers agreement as provided in MS Chapter 103B or a watershed district as provided in MS Chapter 1031). Member representatives completed a review of the last substantive draft of the Agreement, which edits are included in this FINAL Copy. I am available to discuss anything I presented in this document or the FINAL Copy. Respectfully, Tom Communities Gem Lake Lino Lakes North Oaks Water Service Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Township November 15, 2006 To: the member communities of the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO) AA From: Stephanie McNamara, Administrator Re: the FINAL Joint Powers Agreement for your consideration, approval and signature The attached Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) represents what is understood to be the consensus and direction of the last Work session of the Joint Powers task force. A 2-page summary of the JPA is also attached, highlighting changes from the last version is provide by North Oaks Mayor, Tom Watson. Process 1. This copy of the JPA has been the VLAWMO legal counsel, Roger Jensen to review of compliance with State Statute and Rules. His response has been requested within a week and will be forwarded to you as soon as it is received. If he recommends changes, new copies of the JPA will accompany Mr. Jensen's comments. 2. Two copies of the JPA are enclosed for you to consider. If any changes are critical, please forward them within a week. We are asking that the Joint Powers be authorized by all Members, conditioned upon legal review as needed. A sample Resolution of Approval for the VLAWMO JPA is also attached. Please return one signed copy of the JPA along with a Resolution of Approval immediately after your Council or Board considers it. VLAWMO MUST HAVE A FULLY EXECUTED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT IF IT IS TO CONTINUE PAST DECEMBER 31, 2006. 3. As soon as all six authorizations with signed JPA documents are received, seven original Joint Powers Agreements will be circulated to acquire all signatures on the same last page. When complete, your copy will be returned to you. Thank you for all of your hard work and patience. VLAWMO looks forward to 2007 and the opportunity to continue working with all of its Member communities. 800 East Coun` y Road E; Vadnais Heights, MN 55127; 651-204-6070, Fax: 651-204-6173 website: www.vlawmo.ora; email: office@vlawmo.org CITY OF NORTH OAK MEMORANDUM THOMAS N. WATSON, MAYOR OFFICE 651-490-1653 FAX 651-415-29�9 TO: Members of VLAWMO DATE: November 14, 2006 RE: VLAWMO Joint Powers Agreement - FINAL 11/6/06 (11/14/06) tnw version I prepared this summary to identify the changes made to complete this FINAL Copy of the Joint Powers Agreement. We have completed months of meetings and discussions, completed the review of many drafts, and provide a new Agreement that appears to add important features to the operation and management of VLAWMO. I am providing you with an outline of the key features of this FINAL Copy of the Agreement. 1. Organization of Proposed New Agreement. We reorganized the current Agreement into an easier read, more logically organized proposed new Agreement. As a result, we added a section on "Financing' [Section VI], separated the organization of VLAWMO and the Board into two sections [Sections III and IV], and moved the Definitions section (with a few added definitions) from the Appendix to Section II. I included the following sections in this version: SECTION I General Purpose SECTION II Vadnais Lake Area Watershed SECTION III Definitions SECTION IV Organization of VLAWMO; Responsibilities Of Members SECTION V Organization of The Board Of Directors SECTION VI Responsibilities and Duties of The Board Of Directors SECTION VII Responsibilities and Duties of Technical Commission SECTION VIII Financing VLAWMO SECTION IX Duration Of This Joint Power Authority SECTION X Dissolution SECTION XI Counterparts We cleaned up all statutory and Minnesota rules references both as to language and consistency. 2. Governance of VLAWMO We have created a Board of Directors composed of elected officials from each Member municipality to manage VLAWMO, including approving and recommending operating and capital improvement budgets, oversight of watershed operations, and matters required of VLAWMO by state law and rule. The new governance is a two part organization replacing the single organization structure that reflects on the significance of managing surface waters in our watershed area. We have proposed this reorganization with stronger emphasis on (1) technical matters and (2) "business" matters. 3. Creation of a Technical Commission We have created a Technical Commission, accountable to the Board of Directors, composed of appointed representatives from each Member to provide the technical expertise for the planning and operations of VLAWMO. 4. Financing VLAWMO Section We added this section because of the references to budgets and financing VLAWMO were spread throughout the earlier version and the present Agreement. We have introduced the following substantive changes: CITY OF NORTH OAKS MEMORANDUM THOMAs N. WATSON, MAYOR OFFICE 651-490-1653 FAx 651-415-2939 a. Calendar and dates i. VLAWMO budgets prepared by July 1 rather than June 15; ii. Member budget meeting, with Members represented by an elected official, prior to October 15 to review and comment on the proposed budget and complete recommendation of the budgets to the Members; Note: Local governments are required to set their preliminary property tax levy, or September 151 ; iii. Member budget meeting could take place anywhere between July 1 and Oct 15th, presumably between Sept 1 and Oct 15f, and after completing each Member's operating budget, b. Provide for final Member approval of the operating budget by Oct 151h rather than the previous 60 day period after June 15f or July 15t. c. Member Budget Meeting i. Considering the calendar and dates above, the change calls for at least one annual budget meeting of the elected official representatives of VLAWMO Members to complete the budget recommendation to the Members. d. Methods of Financing VLAWMO - no change from previous versions 5. Membership - compared to the present Agreement, the proposed new Agreement does not include the St Paul Regional Water Service/Board of Water Commissioners (SPRWS/BWC) as a Member. SPRWS/BWC has attended some of the planning meetings on the new Agreement, were asked to consider a proposal or make a proposal for their financial contribution to the operations of VLAWMO, and declined to reply and have not done so at the time I am writing this memo. 6. Financing allocation methods a. Present- 40 % valuation, 40% area and 20% population b. Need to consider bases that relate to surface water management, such as impervious surfaces as a contributing factor for drainage and runoff. c. Special tax district -without state legislation, this is not a viable option at this time. 7. Dissolution a. The references for dissolution in the earlier versions are incorrect in my opinion and confuse the issue for application to MS Chap 103B for water management and MS Section 471.59 relative to forming a joint powers entity by agreement. i. Under Section 471.59, any Member choosing to leave the Agreement will cause the Agreement to be terminated. Units of local government can be participants without being Members, including having a financial responsibility and involved in technical matters. ii. The application of MS Chapter 103B is a separate matter with responsibilities for local units of government that can be organized and fulfilled with a WMO under a joint powers agreement as provided in MS Chapter 103B or a watershed district as provided in MS Chapter 1031). 1%•len-iber representatives completed a review of the last substantive draft of the Agreement, which edits are included in this FINAL Copy. I am available to discuss anything I presented in this document or the FINAL Copy. Respectfully, Tom 2 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO PROTECT AND MANAGE THE VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATERSHED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the last date of execution, by and between the participating units of local government of the Cities of Gem Lake, Lino Lakes, North Oaks, Vadnais Heights, and White Bear Lake and the Township of White Bear, hereafter referred to as "Members" and individually as "Member", agree to continue the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization, as a public agency. SECTION I GENERAL PURPOSE The Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO), created, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 471.59, is dependent upon the sincere desire of each Member to work cooperatively to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management statute, Minn. Stat. Section 10313.201 et seq. (Metro Surface Water Management Act) and Chapter 103D (Watershed Law), hereafter collectively referred to as the "Act". It is the general purpose of the parties to this Agreement to establish an organization to: 1) Continue the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization; 2) Develop a water management plan, and 3) Operate appropriate programs including those to: a) protect, preserve and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; b) minimize capital expenditures necessary to correct flooding and water quality problems; c) identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; d) establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; e) prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; f) promote groundwater recharge; and g) protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities and secure other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater, and be in accordance with the Act. SECTION II VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATERSHED VLAWMO shall manage a watershed area in northern Ramsey County and southeastern Anoka County shown on the map set forth on Appendix A. SECTION III DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings as defined in this `� Section. "Agreement" — This Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 reconstituting the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO). "Area"— The boundaries of the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed as set forth on the map set forth on Appendix A and hereafter referred to as the "Area". "Board of Directors" — The governing board of VLAWMO consisting of one elected official from each of the Members which are parties to this Agreement. "Capital Improvement Program" or "capital improvement program" or "Works of Improvement" — A multi -year itemized program, described in the approved VLAWMO Water management Plan and any amendments to it, setting forth the schedule, timing, and details of specific contemplated capital improvements by year. "City Council or Town Board" — The governing body of a governmental unit which is a Member to this Agreement. "City Staff" — Persons hired by units of local government whether as an employee or an independent contractor. "Commissioner" — A person appointed by each Member to the Technical Commission. "Comprehensive Plan" or "comprehensive plan" — The meaning given it in Minn. Stat. Section 473.852, Subdivision 5. "Director" — An elected official appointed by each Member as a representative to the Board of Directors. "Governmental Unit" — Any city, town, township, county, school district, or other political subdivision or an "instrumentality of a governmental unit "as described in Minn. Stat. Section 471.59, Subdivision 1. "Local Government Unit" — Cities, counties and towns, not including school districts, as described in Minn. Stat. Section 473.852, Subd. 7. "Local Water Management Plan" - A plan adopted by the each of the members pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 103B.235. "Member'— Each local governmental unit that is a party to this Agreement. "Technical Commission" — A commission composed of a technically skilled person appointed by each Member. "Vadnais Lake Area Watershed'— The area contained within a line drawn around the extremities of all terrain whose surface drainage is tributary to Vadnais Lake. "VLAWMO" — The abbreviated name of the organization created by the Agreement, the full name of which is the "Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization". "Watershed Management Plan" - A plan adopted by VLAWMO pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 103B.231. SECTION IV ORGANIZATION OF VLAWMO; RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEMBERS Subdivision 1. Board of Directors. The governing body of the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO) shall be its Board of Directors. 2 Subdivision 2. Appointment of Directors. Each Member shall appoint one representative, who must be an elected official, to the Board, and said representative shall be called a "Director". The appointment process shall follow Minn. Stat. Section 103B.227, Subdivisions 1 and 2. Subdivision 3. Term of Office. Each Director shall serve at the will and consent of the Member making the appointment and for a three year term of office as follows: 1) The Directors appointed by the Cities of Lino Lakes and White Bear Lake and the Township of White Bear shall be appointed for three year terms, the beginning date of which was January 1, 2004 and every three years there after. 2) The Directors appointed by the Cities of North Oaks, Gem Lake and Vadnais Heights shall be appointed for a term of three years, the beginning date of which is January 1, 2005 and every three years there after. The term of office of each Director shall commence from the date of their appointment and will continue until their successors are selected. Successor Directors shall serve out the remainder of the term of the Directors they succeed. Subdivision 4. Eligibility to Serve. Each Member shall determine the eligibility or qualification standards for its Director appointment. Eligible appointees should be compliant with Minn. Stat. Section 103B.227, which, among other things provides that local units of government staff may not serve as a Director. Subdivision 5. Record of Appointment. Each governmental unit shall, within thirty (30) days following the appointment of a Director or Successor Director, file a written notice of such appointment with the Secretary of the Board. Subdivision 6. Appointment of Alternate Director. One Alternate Director may be appointed by each of the Members to this Agreement. The Alternate may attend the meetings of the Board of Directors. but only the appointed Director or the Alternate Director in the absence of the Director shall be allowed to vote on any matters before the Board. Subdivision 7. Appointment of Technical Commission Representative. Each Member to this Agreement shall appoint one commissioner and may appoint one alternate to serve on the Technical Commission. Subdivision 8. Compensation. Directors shall serve without compensation and without expense allowance from VLAWMO. A Director may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred on VLAWMO business with the approval of the Board. A Member may compensate its Director or Alternate for his/her service, in the discretion of the Member. SECTION V ORGANIZATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Subdivision 1. Annual Meeting; Election of Officers. At the first meeting of the Board and at the first meeting of each calendar year thereafter, also known as the Annual Meeting, the Board shall elect from among the Directors a Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary and Treasurer, or a combination Secretary -Treasurer, and such other officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and affairs. An Alternate Director may not serve as an officer of VLAWMO. 1 Subdivision 2. Duties of officers 3 1) The Chair shall preside over meetings of the Board, and in the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair shall perform this duty. In the absence of the Chair or Vice Chair. the Treasurer shall preside. The Chair shall retain all rights of a Director to speak, make motions and vote. 2) The Vice Chair shall preside at meetings when the Chair is absent and shall automatically be promoted to complete the annual term of the Chair if the then current Chair resigns or is removed from the Board. 3) The Secretary shall maintain a record of the proceedings of the Board, be responsible for the custody of the records of the Board, see that notices are duly given and complete such other duties as the Board may assign. If the duties of the Secretary are delegated to a VLAWMO employee, the Secretary shall supervise the performance of those duties. 4) The Treasurer shall be responsible for all monies of VLAWMO and shall periodically report the fiscal condition of VLAWMO to the Board. The Chair, Vice Chair, Treasurer and Administrator are authorized to be signers for financial disbursements provided that all checks, other forms of disbursement, or any obligations will require at least two signatures from among the authorized signers. Subdivision 3. Quorum. A majority of the Members present shall constitute a quorum at all Board meetings. In the absence of a quorum, a scheduled meeting shall not be started and the meeting shall be re -scheduled. Subdivision 4. Meetings. Regular meetings of the Board shall be held at least once each quarter on a day and time selected by the Board. All meetings of the Board are subject to the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. Notice of the time and place of each meeting shall be sent to all Members, provided to the public requesting this information, posted one week before the meeting outside the meeting area, and published in a newspaper of general circulation distributed in the VLAWMO area. Meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the latest version of Roberts Rules of Order. Subdivision 5. Voting. Each Director shall have one (1) vote in all matters, as follows: 1) approval of the proposed annual VLAWMO operating budget shall require approval of a simple majority of all Directors; 2) approval of Works of Improvement (capital improvement projects) will require approval of two-thirds (2/3) of all Directors; and 3) approval of all others matters will be determined by a simple majority of Directors present and voting. Subdivision 6. Committees. The Board may appoint such committees and subcommittees as it deems appropriate. At least one Board member shall be the appointed as the Chairman of each committee and all committees shall regularly report their activities to the Board. Subdivision 7. Public Participation. The Board may appoint such committees and subcommittees composed of citizens as needed to provide for public participation and input in watershed activities and the responsibilities of VLAWMO. Such citizen committees shall be advisory. SECTION VI RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Subdivision 1. Policies and Procedures. The Board shall adopt rules and regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its duties and the purpose of this Agreement. Such rules and regulations 4 may be amended from time to time in either a regular or special meeting of the Board provided that notice of such proposed amendment has been given to each Director at least ten (10) day prior to the meeting at which the proposed amendment will be considered. The initial rules and regulations shall be submitted to the Members for their review. Members shall submit their comments to the Board within 45 days. These rules and regulations, after adoption, shall be recorded in the VLAWMO policy book. Subdivision 2. Watershed Management Plan (Plan). The Board shall adopt a water management plan, as required by the Act. The Plan shall be subject to the appropriate governmental unit review as required by the Act. Subdivision 3. Data. The Board, in order to give effect to the purposes of the Act may: 1) Acquire and record appropriate data within the Area; and 2) Establish and maintain devices for acquiring and recording hydrological or other data within the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed. Subdivision 4. Local Studies. Each Member reserves the right to conduct separate or concurrent studies on any matter under study by VLAWMO. Subdivision 5. Transfer of Drainage System. VLAWMO shall have the authority of a watershed district under section Minn. Stat. Chapter 103B to accept the transfer of drainage systems in the watershed, to repair, improve, and maintain the transferred drainage systems, and to construct all new drainage systems and improvements of existing drainage systems in the watershed, provided that projects may be carried out under the powers granted in Minn. Stat. Chapter 103B and that proceedings of the Board with respect to the systems must be in conformance with the Watershed Management Plan adopted pursuant to Minn. Stat. Chapters / 103A throughl03H. Subdivision 6. Works of Improvement. Each Member agrees to contribute its proportionate share of all approved capital improvement expenditures, which includes engineering, planning, legal and administrative costs, based on the benefit to be received by each Member or other entity from the improvement or management project. The Board shall submit, in writing, a statement to each Member or other entity, setting forth in detail the expenses incurred by VLAWMO for each project. Capital improvement projects may be initiated either by (1) recommendation of the VLAWMO Board to the governmental unit(s) affected or, (2) petition to the Board by the affected governmental unit. In either case and after study, and approval by two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors, the Board shall provide the affected governmental units with estimated costs and a description of the benefits to be realized by those affected and the costs to be borne based on benefit. Subdivision 7. Water Conveyances. The Board may order any governmental unit to constrict, clean, repair, alter, abandon, consolidate, reclaim or change the course of terminus of any ditch, drain, storm sewer, water course, natural or artificial, that affects the Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed in accordance with adopted plans. Subdivision S. Watershed Operations. The Board may order any government unit to acquire, operate, construct or maintain dams, dikes, reservoirs and appurtenant works in accordance with adopted plans. J 5 Subdivision 9. Storm and Surface Waters. The Board shall regulate, conserve and control the use of storm and surface water within the Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed pursuant to its Watershed Management Plan. Subdivision 10. Entrance upon land. To the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, the Board or its designated representatives may enter upon lands within or outside the Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed to make surveys and investigations to accomplish the purposes of VLAWMO and the Act. Subdivision 11. Legal and Technical Assistance. The Board may obtain and provide legal and technical assistance in connection with litigation or other proceedings between one or more of its Members and any other political subdivision. commission. board or agency relating to the planning or construction of facilities to drain or pond storm waters within the Area. Subdivision 12. Permits. VLAWMO shall cooperate with appropriate local, state, and federal agencies in obtaining required permits and shall review permits issued by local units of government to accomplish the purposes identified in Section I of this Agreement. Subdivision 13. Office. VLAWMO shall maintain an office within the Area. All notices to VLAWMO shall be mailed or delivered to such office. Subdivision 14. Insurance. VLAWMO may contract for or purchase such insurance as the Board deems necessary for its protection. Subdivision 15. Financial Records. The Board shall maintain the books and accounts of VLAWMO consistent with generally accepted accounting principles and provide the separate accounting of operations and capital improvement projects. Subdivision 16. Audit. The Board shall annually cause an independent certified audit of the books and accounts of VLAWMO. Subdivision 17. Claims. To the extent required by Minnesota Statutes, VLAWMO shall be responsible for damages caused by it. All Minnesota Statutes governing notices of claims and limits on municipal liability shall be applicable to VLAWMO. To the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, VLAWMO shall be treated as a single municipal entity for municipal liability purposes. Subdivision 18. Employees. The Board may employ or subcontract to persons or entities to fulfill defined responsibilities of VLAWMO with the approval of a majority of the Board. Subdivision 19. Contracts. The Board may make such contracts and enter into such agreements as necessary to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Any such contract or agreement shall be in accordance with the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law. Minn. Stat. Section 471.345, and the Joint Powers Act, Minn. Stat. Section 471.59. Subdivision 20. Annual Report to Members. The Board shall make and file a report to all of the Members at least once each year including the following information: 1) the financial condition of VLAWMO; 2) the status of all VLAWMO projects and work; and 3) the business transacted by VLAWMO and other matters which affect the interests of VLAWMO. Copies of said report shall be transmitted to the administrator of each Member. C Subdivision 21. Records. VLAWMO's books, reports and records shall be available for and open to inspection at reasonable times. Subdivision 22. Other Powers. The Board may exercise such other powers necessary and incidental to the implementation of the purposes set forth herein as authorized by the Members. Subdivision 23. Amendments to this Agreement. The Board may recommend changes in this Agreement to the Members. This Agreement may be amended only by th Agreement of each of its members. SECTION VII RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF TECHNICAL COMMISSION Subdivision 1. Duties and Responsibilities. The Board shall establish a Technical Commission (Commission) that will provide technical expertise for the planning and operation of VLAWMO programs and projects. This Commission through the VLAWMO Administrator and other VLAWMO employees shall administer the day-to-day operations of VLAWMO. The VLAWMO Administrator shall serve as a non -voting member of the Commission. Each Member shall appoint a representative, who will be known as Commissioner, and an alternate to the Commission. Subdivision 2. Eligibility to Serve. Each Member shall determine the eligibility or qualification standards for its Commission appointment, following guidelines promulgated by the Board. Subdivision 3. Technical Commission Officers. The Board shall annually appoint a Chair from among the Commissioners. At the first meeting of the Commission each calendar year, the Commission shall elect from among the Commissioners a Vice Chair and Secretary, and such other officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and affairs. An Alternate Commissioner may not serve as an officer of the Commission. Subdivision 4. Meetings. Regular monthly meetings of the Commission shall be held on a day and time selected by the Commissioners. All meetings of the Commission are subject to the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. Notice of the time and place of each meeting shall be sent to all Commissioners, provided to the public requesting this information, posted one week before the meeting outside the meeting area. and published in a newspaper of general circulation distributed in the watershed. Meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the latest version of Roberts Rules of Order. Each Commissioner shall have one vote. A majority of the Commissioners present shall constitute a quorum at all Commission meetings. In the absence of a quorum, a scheduled meeting shall be opened, re -scheduled and adjourned. Subdivision 5. Watershed Management Plan (Plan). The Commission shall prepare and/or update a water management plan, as required by the Act. The Plan, either a new one or an updated one, shall be recommended to the Board of Directors for approval. The Plan shall: 1) Describe the existing physical environment, land use, an development in the area and the environment, land use, and development proposed in existing local and metropolitan comprehensive plans; 2) Present information on the hydrologic systems and components, including any drainage systems previously constructed under Minn. Stat. Sections 106A.005 — 106A.81I and existing and potential problems relating thereto; 7 3) State objectives and policies, including management principles, alternatives and modifications, water quality, and protection of natural characteristics; 4) Set forth a management plan, including the hydrologic and water quality conditions that will be sought and significant opportunities for improvement; 5) Describe the effect of the plan on existing drainage systems; 6) Describe conflicts, if any, between the watershed plan and existing plans of governmental units; 7) Establish a procedure providing for citizen and technical advisory committees or other means of public participation; 8) Set forth an implementation program consistent with the management plan, which includes a capital improvement program and standards and schedules for amending the comprehensive plans and officials controls of governmental units in the watershed to bring about conformance with the watershed plans; and 9) Set out a procedure for amending the water plan. The Plan shall be subject to the appropriate governmental unit review as required by the Act. Subdivision 6. Local Water Management Plan. After the adoption of a new or revised watershed management plan, each Member and any other local government unit within the Area shall review its local water management plan for changes needed for it to be consistent with the new or revised Watershed Management Plan. Each local water management plan shall include: 1) a description of the existing and proposed land uses; 2) a definition of drainage areas, including the volumes, rates and paths of stormwater runoff; 3) identification of areas and elevations for stormwater storage; 4) a description of water quality efforts which may be needed to implement the plan; and 5) an implementation program including official land use and developmental controls and a capital improvement program if needed. After consideration, but before adoption of a new or revised local water management plan by the governmental unit, each Member or any other governmental units in the Area shall submit its water management plan to the Board. The Board shall within sixty (60) days approve or disapprove the plan or parts thereof. If the Board fails to complete its review within the prescribed period, and unless an extension is agreed to by the Member or other local governmental unit, the local plan shall be deemed approved consistent with applicable state laws. Subdivision 7. Dispute Resolution for Water Plan Improvements Initiated. Appeals of Wetland Conservation Act decisions shall follow the procedure outline in MN Rules Chapter 8420.0250. Subdivision 8. Appeals of Decisions and Recommendations of the Commission. Members shall comply with Commission's detenninations as to the force and effect of the Watershed Management Plan, the Local Water Management Plans and any cost allocations for improvements initiated pursuant to these plans. Any governmental unit which disputes a determination of the Commission as to force and effect of the Watershed Management Plan, any Local Water Management Plan, or the cost allocations for improvements, initiated pursuant to these plans, may appeal the recommendation or decision to the Board within thirty (30) days of receipt of such written notice of such determination. Should the appeal not be completed to the satisfaction of all parties, a party may submit the Jdispute to arbitration. Arbitration shall be conducted in the following manner: 8 1) A governmental unit shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the written decision on the appeal by the Board to submit a dispute to arbitration by giving written notice to an officer of the Board; 2) The Board of Arbitration shall consist of three Members, one appointed by the governmental unit initiating the arbitration, one appointed by the Board and one appointed by the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the State of Minnesota, if willing to do so and if not, by the Chief .fudge of the Ramsey County District Court. The third member so appointed shall preside at the arbitration hearing; 3) The arbitration cost of the neutral arbitrator shall be divided equally between VLAWMO and the government unit initiating the arbitration; and 4) Arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Arbitration Act (Minn. Stat. Chapter 572), except as modified above. Subdivision 9. Other Duties. The Commission shall exercise such other duties necessary and incidental to the implementation of the purposes set forth herein as authorized by the Board. SECTION VIII FINANCING VLAWMO Subdivision 1. Annual Operating Budget. On or before July 1 st of each year, the Board shall prepare a proposed annual operating budget for the following calendar year. The budget shall provide funds to operate VLAWMO for the next calendar year. The proposed operating budget and the sources for these funds shall be recommended for approval to the Members. The annual operating budget may be funded by one or more of the following: 1) An authorized special tax levy authorized by the State of Minnesota for an amount approved by the Members; 2) VLAWMO operated Storm Water Utility authorized by the State of Minnesota and approved by the Members; 3) Annual payment from each governmental unit party to this agreement and other entities based on an annual assessment as determined in Subdivision 2 in this Section; and 4) Service fees, grants, interest or other funding sources as available. Each Member shall pay its annual assessment in the following manner: 1) The entire amount shall be due by January 31st of the year due; or 2) One-half (1/2) of each Members entire amount shall be due by January 31 of the year due and the second one-half (1/2) of the entire amount shall be due by August 31 of the year due. Failure to pay the required amounts by the due dates will cause a one (1) percent per month service fee to be added to the unpaid amount due. Subdivision 2. Budget Meeting and Approval. The proposed annual Operating and Capital Improvement budget for the next calendar year shall be prepared by July 1 of each calendar year. Each Member shall review the proposed operating budget and shall either approve, reject or propose an amended operating budget on or before October 15th of each year. No response from a Member, within this time period, will be considered approval of the proposed operating budget. After final approval of the proposed operating budget by each Member, the Secretary shall certify and prepare a statement showing the approved operating budget and the assessed amount to be paid by each Member on or before October 31 of each year. 0 Subdivision 3. Annual Assessment for Services The annual contribution of each Member or other entity shall be calculated upon the following formula: 1) Forty percent (40%) based upon the assessed valuation of all real property of each governmental unit within the Area; 2) Forty percent (40%) based upon the total area of the property within each governmental unit within the Area; and 3) Twenty percent (20%) based upon the population of each governmental unit within the Area. Subdivision 4. Capital Improvement Projects Program and Funding. On or before June 1 of each year the Board shall prepare a capital improvements program and budget for projects to be started or completed in the following year as described in the Water Plan and submit for approval by the Members. Each proposed project shall be described and its estimated cost and time for completion shall be provided. Only projects described in the Watershed Management Plan or its amendments may be included in the capital improvement budget. Funding in the capital improvement budget shall be calculated as follows: 1) If money raised by the Special tax levy or by the Storm Water Utility is to be used for Capital Projects, the Members shall be provided the opportunity to review and approve the amount of the tax levy that will be used for Capital Projects within sixty (60) days of receipt of the Board's Capital Improvement Budget; 2) If a capital project is to be funded wholly or in part by one or more governmental unit(s), they will be provided the opportunity to review and approve or disapprove the capital improvement budget within sixty (60) days of receipt of the Board's Capital Improvement Budget; and 3) If service fees, grants, interest or other funding sources are available the source and amounts of such funds shall be shown. If the capital improvement budget is approved, as provided above, each governmental unit shall contribute its budgeted share of the cost of constructing said capital improvement projects. Subdivision 5. Governmental Unit Financing. Members may establish a watershed management tax district in the Area for the purpose of paying costs of the engineering and planning required to develop a watershed management plan for the Area. After the plan is adopted and approved, a tax district may be established for the purpose of paying capital costs of projects described in the plan (including normal and routine maintenance of projects). If required, the tax district shall be established by ordinance adopted after a hearing by a local government unit, following provisions of Minn. Stat. Chapter 103B. Subdivision 6. Reserve Funds. The Board may accumulate reserve funds for the purposes herein mentioned and may invest funds of the Board not currently needed for its operations in the manner and subject to the laws of Minnesota applicable to statutory cities. Any and all reserve funds must be clearly indicated on the annual financial audit provided to the Members. Subdivision 7. Gifts; Grants; Loans. VLAWMO may, within the scope of this Agreement, accept gifts, apply for and use grants or loans of money or other property from the United States, the State of Minnesota, a unit of government or other governmental unit or organization or any person or entity for the purposes described herein, may enter into any reasonable agreement required in connection therewith, shall comply with any laws or regulations applicable thereto, and may hold, use and dispose of such money or property in accordance with the terms of the gift, grant, loan or agreement related thereto. SECTION IX DURATION OF THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT Subdivision I. Duration of Agreement. Each Member agrees to be bound by the terms of this Agreement until December 31, 2011, and that it may be continued thereafter at the option of the Members. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon the filing of certified copy of the resolution approving said Agreement by each governmental unit. Subdivision 2. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until the majority of the Members shall agree to terminate this Agreement or it expires. This Agreement may be replaced by a new joint powers agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 471.59 to provide for continuing the work of VLAWMO consistent with Minn. Stat. Chapter 103B. SECTION X DISSOLUTION Subdivision 1. Dissolution of VLAWMO. VLAWMO shall continue until the majority of the Members shall mutually agree to dissolve VLAWMO which proceeding must be in accord with Minnesota Rules 8410.0180. Subdivision 2. Petition to Dissolve VLAWMO. Consistent with Minnesota Rules 8410.0180, all Members may petition the Board of Water and Soil Resources to terminate VLAWMO. This petition shall be in the form of a resolution from the Board of VLAWMO. Upon 90 days notice, in writing, to the clerk/administrator or each Member, Ramsey and Anoka Counties, the Board shall hold a hearing and upon favorable vote of a majority of the Board of Commissioners submit the petition to the Board of Water and Soil Resources recommending that VLAWMO be dissolved. The resolution adopted shall recognize that the Members, jointly or severally, are willing and able to assume ownership of VLAWMO's assets and the responsibility for managing and maintaining VLAWMO's previously approved projects and implement the watershed plan of VLAWMO developed pursuant to Minn. Stat. Chapter 103B. Such resolution by the Board of Commissioners shall be submitted as a petition to the State Board of Water and Soil Resources requesting that a hearing be held pursuant to procedures in Minn. Stat. Chapter 103B. Upon a set of findings and order for dissolution of VLAWMO by the State Board of Water and Soil Resources, all property of VLAWMO shall be transferred. either jointly or severally, to the governmental units of VLAWMO. Such transfer of VLAWMO assets may be made in proportion the total contribution of each Member as required by the last annual operating budget. The transfer of real estate property of VLAWMO pursuant to this section shall not affect the benefits or damages for any improvement previously constructed by VLAWMO before dissolution. The real estate property affected shall remain liable for its proper share of any outstanding indebtedness of VLAWMO applying to the property before the dissolution, and levies assessment for the indebtedness continue in force until the debt is paid off. 11 _i SECTION XI COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts and all so executed shall constitute one Agreement that is binding on all of the parties hereto notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to the original of the same counterpart. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the following parties have executed this agreement on the day of complete execution thereof by all parties, CITY OF GEM LAKE By Mayor Dated /_ _/ Attest City Clerk CITY OF LINO LAKES Dated CITY OF NORTH OAKS Dated CITY OF VADNAIS HEIGHTS Dated / / CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE Dated WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP Dated / / (VLAWMO7PA2007) By _ Mayor Attest City Clerk By Mayor Attest City Clerk By Mayor Attest City Clerk By Mayor Attest City Clerk By Chair Attest City Clerk 12 (Aaims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 11/20/2006 "-1 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Hutch Schilling, Council Richard Bosak, Council Tom Rasmussen, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Signatures Approving Claims For Payment Date Of Approial DATE / 77''/ DATE /001 Ary 1) %TE DATE q7 llbV DATE ll 1`0 DATE le /ad 45 CLAIM# PAD PAID TO I DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM I S AMOUNT I GENERALFUND SEWER I FUND SP 2133 20-Nov-2006 Metropolitan Council Curernt User Charges: December 2006 1,038.47 _ - _ ' 1,038.47 SP 2134 20-N_ov-2006 Gopher State One -Call 13 tix @ $1.45/each 18.85 _ 18,85 SP 2135 09-Nov-2006 Capra's Utilities, Inc. Sewer Connection Repair 500.00 500.00 SP 2136 20-Nov-2006 SEH, INC. TOTAL CLAIM 595.00 _ SP 2136 20-Nov-2006 1 SEH, Inc. City Eng Svcs: Meier Sewer Service Issue 273.00 SP 2136 1 20-Nov-2006 SEH, In_c. Sanitary Sewer Maintenance_ 322.00 SP 2137 20-Nov-2006 City of Gem Lake General Fund Transfer Payment_ for Fire Inspection Fee - 169.50 169.50 SP 2138 , 20-Nov-2006 Paul R. Emeott SewerLoeating Ihrc 78 - 78.00 78.00 SP 2139 20-Nov-2006 _ MAGNUSO_N & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM 405.60 SP 2139 20-N_ov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC SewerAdministration:Oct/Novt-02.7 hours 210.60 SP 2139 20-Nov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC AsstClerkSewer:Oct/Nov-03.00 hours 195.00 GP 6944 09-Nov-2006 j Molly Bonin Head Judge General Election: 11.00 hrs a $14.0 454.( 154.001 GP 6945 09-Nov-2006 LKristina Swanson Judge General Election: 11.00 hrs ©$12.00 132.00 GP 6946 09-Nov-2006 awn S-gennark Judge General Election: ]0.00 hrs @ $12.00 120.0J0 12 0 GP 6947 09-Nov-2006 abrielle Blake rHILARY Judge General Election: 10.00 hrs © $12.00 120.0)D _ 120.001 GP 6948 09-Nov-2006 MAG_NUSON TOTAL CLAIM 163.00 f GP 6948 GP 6948 09-Nov-2006� Hilary Magnuson 09-Nov-2006 Hilary Magnuson Judge General Election: 11.5 hrs Q $12.00 PIP 2006-01 Mailing Set Up cr 1.00 hrs @ $25 _ 138.00 25.001 GP 6949 09-Nov-2006 ` VOID - VOID - 0.00 GP 69501 20-Nov-2006 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE I TOTAL CLAIM _ _ 1,264.33 GP 6950 20-Nov-2006 City of White Bear Lake Fire & Paramedic: November 2006 I 942.33 GP 69501 20-N_ov-2006 City of White Bear Lake Fire Marshall & InsFeetions: November 2006 322.001 GP 6951 20-N_ov-2006 Xcel Energy Street Lighting: October 2006 72.89 72.891 GP 6952 20-Nov-2006 PRESS PUBLICATIONS TOTAL CLAIM 168.011 1 GP 6952 20-Nov-2006 Press Publications Leg Trans: #131407 Public Notice 2006-33 38.25 69521 20-Nov-2006 Press Publications Leg Trans: #133132 Notice of Public Election - 76.50 _GP 6952 20-Nov-2006 Press Publications Leg Trans: #136400 Meeting Change I I/1312006 51,00 _GP :GP 6952 20-Nov-2006 I Press Publications Leg Trans: #136401 Public Notice 2006-37 178.50 GP 69521 20-Nov-2006 Press Publications Balance Forward _ (176.24) GP 6953 20-Nov-2006 Waste Managmemt Curbside Recycling: November 2006 318.001 318.001 GP 6954'', 20-Nov-2006 ,SEH. INC. TOTAL CLAIM 3,172.86� GP 6954 20-Nov-2006 SEH, Inc. Comp Plan 2008 3,096161 GP 6954, 20-N_ov-2006 SEH, Inc. _ PIP 2006-01 Road Feasibility_ 76.60 GP 6955' 20-Nov-2006 ALLE_N 0. ZEPPER TOTAL CLAIM 4,120.93 GP 6955 20-Nov-2006_ Allen O. Zepper j Permit Closure #132006-01 2,238.26 GP 6955 20-Nov-2006 Allen O. Zapper Permit Closure 4M2006-04 - _ 187.50 GP 6955 20-Nov-2006 Allen O. Zapper Permit Closure #P2006-03 _ _! 234,38 I GP 6955 20-Nov-2006 Allen O. Zepper Plan Review for#B2006-11 - -�- 1,460.79 GP 6956 20-Nov-2006 KELLY & FAWCETT, P A. I TOTAL CLAIM 6,679.25 GP 6956 20-Nov-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. GeneralCounsel 4,378.75 GP 6956 20-Nov-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A_ Annexation Matters: Bryan Hansen - _1- 725.50 GP 6956 20-Nov-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. Annexation Matters: McNulty -_ 560.00 GP 6956 20-Nov-2006 Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. Annexation Matters: Tom Hanson - -1 805.00 GP 6956 20-N_ov-2006 Kelly & Fa%vicetl. P.A. Annexation Matters: Hartford } 210,00 GP 6957 20-Nov-2006 Jiffi Print Printing Remittance Envelopes/Attn_ Treasurer 93.67, 93.67 GP 6958 20-Nov-2006 RAMSEY COUNTY TOTAL CLAIM 5,765.29 RLI11: 1 ] /20/2006 at 02:20:58 PM Page 1 of 2 File: 06claiml l .123 Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 11/20/2006 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Hutch Schilling, Council Richard Bosak, Council Tom Rasmussen, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk DATE CLAIM# PAID I PAID TO GP 6958 20-Nm -2006 Ramsey County GP 6958 20-Nov-2006 Ramsey Count) GP 6959' 20-Nov-2006 MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC GP 6959 20-Nov-2006 Meslow &_ Olson, PLLC GP 6959 20-Nov-2006 Meslow & Olson, PLLC GP 6960 20-Nov-2006 '['HE ZEVAN CORPORATION GP 6960 20-N_ov-2006 The ZeVan Corporation GP 6960 20-N_ov-2006 The ZeVan Corporation GP 6961 20-Nov-2006 Leonard,O'Bricn, Spencer, Gale & Sayre GP 6962 20-Nov-2006 PAUL R. EMEOTT GP 6962 20-Nov-2006 Paul R. Emeott GP 6962 20-Nov-2006 Paul R. Emeott GP 6962 20-N_ov-2006 Paul R. Emeott GP 6962 20-N_ov-_ Paul R. Emeott 6v-2006 GP 693 20-No2006_ i MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 : Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 i Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-N_ov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 i Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-N_ov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-N_ov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC GP 6963 20-Nov-2006 Magnuson & Associates. LLC j Si natures Approving Claims For Payment Date Of Approval DATE DATE OV2AI .0 r DATEOV DATE DATE DATE ALL 11/20/2006 NOVEMBER SUMMARY 8.33% Of Budget Monthly ALL 11/20/2006 YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY 91.67% Of Year Completed ALL 11/20/2006 VERSUS ANNUAL BUDGET 91.67% Of Year Completed DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM I GENERAL I SEWER $ AMOUNT FUND FUND Law Enforcement: November 2006 911 Dispatch Services 10/1 /2006-10/3 1/2006 TOTAL CLAIM TciconlW/Dctendcn1Rc:Ophelan (+Credit Amo Jury Trial: Danielle Larson TOTAL CLAIM Public Awareness Services Waiver: November -1- Public Awareness Services Waiver: December _ ( Hansen Detach/Annex TOTAL CLAIM Intergovernmental Migs. I a $20/11 a $25 Plan Reviews: I hr @S78 NPDES Admin .Shrs@S78 Printing Costs TOTAL CLAIM Telephone&FacsimileService: Oct/Nov06 OtliceSupplies.Copying& Postage: Oct/Nov06 NetworklTOutsideServices Mileage(]20@a $0.445)/Oct/Nov06 IntcrnctAccess{50%):Oct/Nov06 MiscellaneousElectionExpense_ OutsideMeetingExpense-CityHolIRFP GeneralAdministration:Oct/Nov-45.2 hours Capital ProjectAdministration:Oct/Nov-02.2 h ElectionAdininistration:Oct/Nov-03.1 hours AsstC lerkCapitalProjects:Oct/Nov-4.3hours AsstClerkGeneral:Oct/Nov-21.25 hours TOTAL FOR NOVEMBER % Annual Budget TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE %Annual Budget Annual Budget $Under/($Over) Annual Budget %Under/ -%Over 5,533 58 231.71 17325 13251 160.00 1,000.00 ' )6 500.00 16 500.00 467.50 467.501, _ 438.84 �� _ 295,00 78.00 _ 39.001 — 26.84 7,962.76 117.86 480.93 75.00 53.40 12.95 104.81 47.11 3,525,601 1.380.60 650.001 279.501 1,235.001 $35,192.00 1 $32,386.581 $2,805.42 9.60% 8.83% 0.76% $522,887.49I $501,441.84 $21,445.65 142.57% 158.29% 42,93% ($186,703.65) ($211,045.50) $24,341.85 50.91 % i -66.62% 48.73% Run: 11/20/2006 at 02:20:58 PM Page 2 of 2 File: 06claim11.123 GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT (Y OF GEM y County Road Gem Lake, MN LAKE "E" East 55110-5231 GENERAL FUND CHECKING C H K I N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 01J01/2005 START -14098.68 73120.25 43564.93 44,106.03 BANK BALANCE 6,377.66 6.177.66 4,913.33 4 8.33 4,224.33 3,783.09 3,695.91 -531649.94 444431.01 -87218.93 DEBIT 17,667.70 (200.00 (1,264.33 375.00 (314.00 441.24 (87.18 2,800.00 (1,636.05 5,159.61 5,765.29 75.03 100.00 (4,040.11 CREDIT 38240.74 BALANCE 6,377.66 6.177.66 4,913.33 4 3&33 4,224.33 3,695.91 3,695.91 TRAN DATE TRAN # P6930 %931 %932 P6933 P6934 P6935 936 %937 P6939 39 P6940 941 P6942 3 1 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 81 CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM KELLY & FAWCETT, P.A. Mark A. Sweet CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE CINDY S1-nTS Waste eM INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDU Eklin Soil Testis and Inspections. Inc. LEONARD,O'BRIEN,SPENCER,G SEH, INC. RAMSEY COUNTY Xcel Rick Johnson Deer and Beaver Inc. MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC David Gardner Steve Herzog ODEA CONSTRUCTION Richard Kieslin John Navin Min Soo Lee Scott Tessier Giovanna Leick Gordon Kordosky Raymond Tessier JohnMathem PAYMENT FOR TOTAL CLAIM Attendln!g Mtge 8 MW x P In TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM Curbside R i" October 2006 TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM 2006 ions: l l2 Homes $25/ea TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL PAYMENT TOTAL CLAIM Street Lighting: September 2006 Removal of Dead Deer SIM/= TOTAL CLAIM Bi-Annual Septic 1 on: 2006 VwWice#2006-0CoodUse)A Fee(1ncIGMS TOTAL PAYMENT Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic . 2006 Bi-Annual SC Ins : 2006 Bi-Annual Septic I ion 2006 Bi-Annual on: 2006 Bi-Annual tic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual tic Inspection: 2006 23-0ct-06 27-Oct-06 24-Oct-06 24-Oct-06 25-Oct-06 25-0ct-06 23-Oct-06 23-Oct-06 23-Oct-06 23-Oct-06 16-Oct-06 24-Oct-06 16-Oct-06 35.00 250.00 333.35 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 895.91 40.14 5,899.75 (11,665.04 11.740.0 11,940. 15,980.1$ 15,845.18 (15,595.18 15,261.83 15,226.83 15 191.93 15,1.83 I5,121.83 15.096.93 (15,051.83 15,016.83 (14,981.83 895.91 (740.14 (5,899.75 5,899.75 (5,974.78 5,974.78 10,014.89 (9,979,99 (9,729.89 19-Oct-06 05-Oct-06 05-Oct-06 05-0ct-06 05-Oct-06 05-Oct-06 05-Oct-06 (9,396.54 (9,361.54 (9,326.54 (9,291.54 ,256:54 (9,221.54 ,186.54 05-Oct-06 05-Oct-06 05-0et-06 05-Oct-06012 05-Oct-06 (9,151.54 (9,116.54 05-Oct-06 05-Oct-06 i5-Oct-06 �-Oct-06 p5-OCt.06 06-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 15 16 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Glad s Pazenteau F.C. n M. Ione Payette Fred Maealus FRED MACALUS, SR. State of Minnesota ire Transfer) Sherrie O'Macel Dan Janssen Vernon Gnmdhofer Ro Quam Hu Sclu7lin Danis Aili Auto Bi-Annual tic Ins tion: 2006 Bi-Annual icI on:2006 Bi-Annual Septic n: 2006 Bi-Annual Ins : 2006 TOTAL PAYMENT Traffic Fines: October 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Ins on: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic In9 lion: 2006 Bi-Annual Se is Ins : 2006 Bi-Annual Se tic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual is : 2006 Si Permit #S2006-06 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 333.35 117.50 35.00 35,000(14,320.99" 35.0014,285.98 35.0014.250.98 35.0014,215.98 100.0014,115.98 14,946.839,046.54 14911.83(9,046.54 (14,876.83 (14,841.83 14,508.48 (14,390.98 14.355.98 9,011.54 8,976.54 8 643.19 (8,525.69 (8,490.69 (8,455.69 (8,420.6912-Oct-06 8,385.12-Oct-06 (8,350.69 (8,250.69 105.0014,010.98 11.34 162.00 35.00 (13,999.64) (13,837.64J 13,802.64 (8,145.69 (8,134.35 (7,972.35 (7,937.35 12-0ct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 7 8 9 10 DANIEL & CONSTANCE KUNiN Parsinen, Kaplan, Rosberg & Kaplan Ramsey County James Segermark TOTAL PAYMENT10 Document Sales: Ordinance No. 58 (Subdivisio ProcccWromDWWorfeiturcFundAuction Bi-Annual _ c on: 2006 10 10 10 35.00 ( 13,767.64 (7,902.35_Inspection: 12-Oct-06 11 Gloria Tessier Bi-Annual Sc tic2006 10 12-Oct-06 12 Howard Cammack Bi.Annual tic Inspection: 2006 10 10 10 10 10 I0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 (13,732.64 (13,6 (13,662.64 .64 (13,627.64 (13,592.64 (13,557.64 (13,522.64 13,487.64 13,452.64 13.417.64 (13,382.64 13.347.64 13,312.64 13 277.6d 13,242.64 13,207.64 (13,172.64 13,137.64 7,867.35 7,.3 7,79797.35 7,762.35 (7,727.35 7,692.35 7,657.35 7,622.35 (7,587.35 ,552.3 (7,482-35 ,82 35 ,447.35 ,412.35 7,377.35 (7,342.35 7,307.35 ,27235 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 -Oct-06 13 14 15 16 17 ] 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Frankie Lin "ti Suzanne P b lski Kathleen Robins Susan Zasada Richard Nordstrom Donald Hewitt Roberta Feiner James Lindner Charles Granlund Lance Austad Rland Birkebak Richard Arcand May Estrem Tom Hansen Brad Jonas Bill John Dan Marier Bi-Annual "c Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 ion: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: Bi-Annual Se Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bnnual Septic lnspcc ion: 2006 i-A Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspecton 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Ins 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual §90C Ipgection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual _c lnspection 2006 Run Date: 11/06/2006 at 11:49:17 AM E-File: CbeckinglGenFund06.123 Page 1 of 2 GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT -Y OF GEM LAKE } County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 GENERAL FUND CHECKING C H K I N -14098.68 01/01/2005 START 73120.25 -531649.94 : 444431.01-87218.93 38240.74 DEBTT CREDIT BALANCE 43564.93 44,106.03 BANK BALANCE TRAN DATE TRAN # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR 12-Oct-06 30 Darlene McPhillips Bi-Annual Septic Ingwdon: 2006 10 35.00 13,102.64 7,237.35 12-Oct-06 31 Tom Rasmussen Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 1 35.00 13,067.64 ,202.35 12-Oct-06 32 Mark Dvorak Bi-Annual Septic I tion: 2006 10 35.00 13,032.64 (7,167.35 12-Oct-06 33 Tom McMahon Bi-Annual Septic 'on: 2006 10 35.00 12,997.64 (7,132.35 12-Oct-06 34 Sue N Bi-Annual Se 1 Lion: 2006 10 35.00 (12,962.64 (7,097.35 12-Oct-06 35 Kenneth Jungmann Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 12,927.64 7,062.35 12 Oct-06 36 Dale Swoml Bi-Annual S 'e Ins ion: 2006 10 35.00 12,892.64 7,027.35 12-Oct-06 37 Alden Schriber Bi-Annual Se Gc Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 12,857.64 6,992 35 12-Oct-06 12-Oct-06 38 39 Holly Watson Ken Kirchhoff Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 10 35.00 35.00 12,822.64 12,797.64 U(kW 12-Oct-06 40 Richard Arcand Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 12.752.64 12-Oct-06 41 Tom Bi-Annual 'c Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 12,717.64 6,852 35 12-Oct-06 42 Kathleen Brown Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 12 682.64 (6,817.35 12-Oct-06 43 Barbara Major Bi-Annual Septic Inspection., 2006 10 35.00 12,647.64 6,782.35 19-Oct-06 1 I Julie Heffem Bi-Annual Septic Inspection; 2006 10 35.00 12,612.64 6,747.35 19-Oct-06 2 Patrick I Bi-Annual Septic I on: 2006 10 35.00 12,577.64 (6,712.35 19-Oct-06 3 Debra Larsen Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 12,542.64 6,677.35 19-Oct-06 4 Chia Vue Bi-Annual Septic In_specdn: 2006 o 10 35.00 (12,507.64 6,642 35 19-Oct-06 5 Crai RSSWW Bi-Annual Septic lns ion: 2006 10 35.00 12472.64 6,607.35 19-Oct-06 19-Oct-06 6 7 Stilly Hendrickson Dianne Carlson Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 10 35.00 35.00 (12,437.64 12,402.64 6,572.35 _ (6,5373 19-Oct-06 81 Beth FI Bi-Annual Septic [ ion: 2006 10 35.00 12,367.64 6,50235 19-Oct-06 91 Alan Becicka Bi-Annual Septic Itts Lion: 2006 10 35.00 (12,332.64 (6,46735 19-Oct-06 19-Oct-06 10 11 Dorothy Snodie Thomas Bolfin Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 10 35.00 35.00 12,297.64 I2,262.64 6,43235 (6,39735 19-Oct-06 12 Patrick Arcand Bi-Annual is I -on: 2006 10 35.00 12,227.64 6j62.35 19-Oct-06 13 Mari Sievers Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 (12.192.64 6,327.35 -N 141 Andre Yadeau Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 12,157.64 6,292.35 *Oct-06 19-Oct-06 151 1 LindaHoeschler Gem Lake Sewr Investment Fund Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 Tem Loan 10 10 35.00 50,000.00 12.122.64 37,877.36 6,257.35 43,742.65 30-Oct-06 1 David Merrick Bi-Annual 'c Inspection: 2006 10 37,9 65 43,788.30 30-Oct-06 30-Oct-06 2 3 Nelson Kenneth Lorenz Document Sales: Assessments Bi-Annual Se Inspection: 2006 10 10 10.65 35.00 35.00 3.01 37.958.01 37,958.01 43.923.30 43,823.30 30-Oct-06 4 Eu Newcomb Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 37 993.01 43.958.30 30-Oct-06 5 Lisa Hurt Bi-Annual Septic Inspection: 2006 10 35.00 38.028.01 43,89330 30-Oct-06 61 Thomas Hoffman Bi-Annual Septic 1 on: 2006 10 35.00 39.063.01 43,928.30 30-Oct-06 7 RASCHER PLUMBING & HEATING TOTAL PAYMENT 10 140.50 39.203.51 44,068.80 20-Oct-06 1 Deluxe Business Systems Check PrhWn 10 87.70 38.115.81 43,981.10 31-Oct-06 1 Premier Bank Interest Paid This Period 10 1 124.93 38,240.74 44,106.03 Run Date: 11/06/2006 at 11:51:37 AM E-File: CheckinglGenFund06.123 Page 2 of 2 Premier ECUAL 11051r;l LENDER Elan Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. MEMBER F)IC CITY OF GELS LAKE GENERAL FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Page: 1 Account Number: 6005590 Statement Date: 10/31/06 Checks/Items Enclosed: 22 86 PREEZRRED ELITE Now offering Health Savings Accounts Contact your branch office for more infromation CITY Or GELS LARE GENERAL FUND Beginning Balance 10/01/06 Deposits / Misc Credits 9 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 16 ** Ending Balance 10/31/06 Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 10/31/06 Interest Paid Year To Date Annual Percentage Yield Earned Number of Days for A.P.Y.E. Average Balance for A.P.Y.E. Average Collected Balance Min; ,m Balance Enclosures Miscellaneous Credits Acct 6005590 32,542.98 54,208.62 42,645.57 44,106.03 ** .00 124.93 2,933.11 3.95 31 37,947.93 37,948 24,045 22 Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 10/05 1,371.70 DEPOSIT 10/06 117.50 MN STATE FINANCE/ACH PYMT GEM LARE CITY OF 10/12 553.34 DEPOSIT 10/12 595.00 DEPOSIT 10/12 595.00 DEPOSIT 10/19 525.00 DEPOSIT 10/19 50,000.00 DEPOSIT 10/30 326.15 DEPOSIT 10/31 124.93 INTEREST EARNED SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CITY OF GEM LAKE Miscellaneous Debits Date Deposits ----10�20 — - -- - - Paid Checks Date Check No. 10/04 6902 10/04 6912* 10/03 6922* 10/23 6930* ' 27 6931 Daily Balance Summary Date Balance 10/03 32,352.74 10/04 24,045.36 10/05 25,417.06 10/06 25,534.56 10/12 27,277.90 Page: 2 Account Number: Statement Date: Withdrawals Activity Description 87.70 DELUXE BUS SYS./BUS MDS FREDRIC MAGNUSON * indicates skip in check numbers Amount Date Check No. - Amount Date Check No. 7,917.38 10/24 6932 1,264.33 10/23 6937 390.00 10/24 6933 375.00 10/23 6938 190.24 10/25 6934 314.00 10/23 6939 17,667.70 10/25 6935 441.24 10/24 6941* 200.00 10/23 6936 87.18 10/19 6943* 6005590 10/31/06 Amount 2,800.00 1,636.05 5,159.61 75.03 4,040.11 Date Balance Date Balance 10/19 73,762.79 10/25 43,854.95 10/20 73,675.09 10/27 43,654.95 10/23 46,324.55 10/30 43,981.10 10/24 44,610.19 10/31 44,106.03 TREASURER'S REPORT SEWER FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE r OF GEM LAKE County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110.5231 TRAM TRAN CHECKS TO DATE # DEPOSITS FROM SEWER FUND CHECKING C H K I N OS Jan START 42 82 31428.18 BANK BALANCE 41587.55 31040.01 72627.56 627.56 PAYMENT FOR DEBIT CREDIT 31382.23 BALANCE 24-Oct-06 SP2129 Metropolitan Council Current User Charges: November 2006 10 -1038.47 26863.91 26864.91 16-Oct-06 SP2130 Gopher State One -Call 31 fix $1.45/ea -44.95 26818.96 26864.91 23-Oct-06 SP2131 SEK Inc. Sanitary Sewer Maintenance 101 -386.00 26432.96 26478.91 19-Oct-06 SP2132 MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM 10 -280.15 26152.81 26198.76 05-Oct-06 1 TNT Sales, Inc. 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Commercial 10 86.00 26238.81 26284.76 12-Oct-06 1 Janet Franz 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26281.81 26327.76 12-Oct-06 2 Peter Gaetke 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26324.81 26370.76 12-Oct-06 3 Stephen Turnbull 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26367.81 26413.76 12-Oct-06 41 Alta Estrin 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26410.81 26456.76 12-Oct-06 51 Karl Stuemke 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26453.81 26499.76 12-Oct-06 6 Loraine Birkeland 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26496.81 26542.76 12-Oct-06 7 John Hurt 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43,001 26539.81 26585.76 12-Oct-06 8 James Terry 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.001 26582.81 26628.76 12-Oct-06 9 Penny Shophad 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26625.81 26671.76 12-Oct-06 10 Lynn Larkin 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26668.81 26714.76 12-Oct-06 11 Tolomeo Ong 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26711.81 26757.76 12-Oct-06 12 Patrick Ophelan 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 26754.81 26800.76 12-Oct-06 13 DAN MARIER TOTAL PAYMENT 10 47.30 26802.11 26848.06 12-Oct-06 141 ALLEN DRUMMOND TOTAL PAYMENT 10 903.00 27705.111 27751.06 19-Oct-06 1 I Charles Rudisel 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 27748.11 27794.06 19-Oct-06 21 Derek Wippich 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 27791.11 27837.06 19-Oct-06 3 1 Knot Sk'erseth 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 27834.11 27880.06 19-Oct-06 41 Matt Flynn3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43,00 27877.11 27923.06 19-Oct-06 5 William Flas eter 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 27920.11 27966.06 19-Oct-06 6 Ronald Peterson 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 27963.11 28009.06 19-Oct-06 71 Pete Oswald 3rd Qt 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 28006.11 28052.06 19-Oct-06 8 Hazel White 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 28049.11 28095.06 -Oct-06 9 Tousley Ford 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Commercial 10 1548.00 29597.11 29643.06 Oct-06 1 Helen Kahl 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 29640.11 29686.06 -06 2 Craig Bemdsen 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 29683.11 29729.06 30-Oct-06 3 Lloyd Lahore 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 29726.11 29772.06 30-Oct-06 4 G Tan all 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43.00 29769.11 29815.06 30-Oct-06 5 R.T. Donahue 3rd Qtr 2006 Sewer Fees/Residential 10 43,00 29812.11 29858.06 30-Oct-06 6 SINGH ENTERPRISES, LLC TOTAL PAYMENT ] 0 1032.00, 30844.11 30890.06 30-Oct-06 7 TNT SALES, INC. TOTAL PAYMENT 10 103.20 30947.31 30993.26 30-Oct-06 8 Nelson Marine 3rd 2006 Sewer Fees/Commercial 10 172.00 3111931 31165.26 30-Oct-06 9 Gem Lake Hills Golf Course 3rd 2006 Sewer Fees/Commercial 10 258.00 31377.31 31423.26 31-Oct-06 1 Premier Bank Interest Paid This Period 10 4.92 31382.231 31428.18 I Run Date: 11/06/2006 at 12:06:12 PM E-File: CheckingMewerFund06.123 Page 1 Premier Ban k Allinnesota Owned. Allinnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE SEWER FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 NOW OFFERING Page: 1 Account Number: 6005582 Statement Date: 10/31/06 Checks/Items Enclosed: 7 86 Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture NON PROFIT PPFMTER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE Acct 6005582 SEWER FUND Beginning Balance 10/01/06 27,903.38 Deposits / Misc Credits 5 5,229.42 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 3 1,704.62 ** Ending Balance _ 10/31/06 31,428._18 ** Service Charge .00 Interest Paid Thru 10/31/06 4.92 Interest Paid Year To Date 49.06 Annual Percentage Yield Earned .20 Number of Days for A.P.Y.E. 31 Average Balance for A.P.Y.E. 28,982.83 Average Collected Balance 28,983 Mini*m= Balance 27,903 Enclosures 7 Miscellaneous Credits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 10/05 86.00 DEPOSIT 10/12 1,466.30 DEPOSIT 10/19 1,892.00 DEPOSIT 10/30 1,780.20 DEPOSIT 10/31 4.92 INTEREST EARNED Paid Checks * indicates skip in check numbers Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. 10/24 2129 1,038.47 10/23 2131* 386.00 10/19 2132 �� LEKON 'MET19ER FDIC Amount 280.15 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CITY OF GEM LAKE Daily Balance Suumm j Account Number: Statement Date: Page: 2 6005582 10/31/06 Date Date Balance Date Balance 10%23 30,681.53 10%30 33,4Z3 �6- 10/24 29,643.06 10/31 31,428.18 Balance 10/05 27,989:38 10/12 29,455.68 10/19 31,067.53 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE 1� OF GEM LAKE 2004 - 2006 BONDS C County Road "E" East CAPITAL PROJECT FUND H Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 CHECKING#6103844 K PAYMENT FOR TN HEC TCHECKSTO RA DATE # DEPOSITS FROM I N 1--40 PREMIER BANK WBL 03-Nov-04 START -787116.81 992037.57 DEBIT I CREDIT TREASURER'S REPORT 0.00 545857.85 204920.76 204920.76 BANK BALANCE BALANCE Run Date: 11/09/2006 at 01:05:40 PM E-File: Checlang3Prolecl06.123 Page I Premier NW0106 Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. Page: 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Account Number: 6103844 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E Statement Date: 10/31/06 GEM LAKE mN 55110-5231 Checks/Items Enclosed: 0 86 NOW OFFERING Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture NON PROFIT PR AIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Beginning Balance 10/01/06 Deposits / M.isc Credits 0 Withdrawals / Misr- Debits 0 ** Ending Balance 10/31/06 Service Charge Average Balance Average Collected Balance N ni nmm Balance J Acct 6103844 204,920.76 .00 .00 204,920.76 .00 204,921 204,921 204,920 LENDER. MEMBER FDIC SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DEBIT FUND CHECKING 2006 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT r ti' OF GEM LAKE i 2006 BONDS FROM PIP200"I County Road "E" East DEBT SERVICE Gem Lake, MN 55110.5231 CHECKING #6103780 TRAN TRAM CHECKS TO DATE # DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR — C H K I N Ol Jan OS START 0.00 91214.05 BANK BALANCE -62340.78 126685.981 26868.85 DEBIT CREDIT 91214.05 BALANCE 91214.05 91214.05 0 Run Date: 11/09/2006 at 01:09:16 PM E-File: Chocking4Bonds06.123 Page I 112r _ Premier iecicniz 51' Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. Pv1EFABER FDIC Page: 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE 6103780 SERVICE 2004 DEBIT FUND Account Number: 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E Statement Date: 10/31/06 GEM LARF. MN 55110-5231 Checks/Items Enclosed' 0 86 NOW OFFERING Health Savings Accounts & Remote Deposit Capture NON PROFIT pRIKb[ER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE SERVICE 2004 DEBIT FUND Beginning Balance 10/01/06 Deposits / Misc Credits 0 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 0 ** Ending Balance 10/31/06 Service Charge f Average Balance Average Collected Balance Minim * mm, Balance Acct 6103780 91,214.05 .00 .00 91,214.05 ** .00 91,214 91,214 91,214 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION