Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 02-23 CC PACKETCITY OF GEM LAKE Mondav CITY COUNCIL AGENDA a ruary 2004 r , . ----CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Emeott atgg : f J m. TTT Tl1T T t.I7LL v MAYOR, 2002 CITY COUNCIL, 2002 _GI I 1 COLJNCII_, 2002 _QIT-Y"COUNCIL, 2004 CITY COUNCIL, 2004 Paul Emeott ✓ 9uck Watson Rick Bosak L­� Pat Igo Loam collie Birkebak CITY CLERK , / TREASURER CITY ATT06EY CITY PROSECUTOR SR. BUILDING OFFICIAL Fritz Magnuson GGG/// Sarah Cobian Tom Newcome III Doug Meslow Allen Zepper OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE (Attach List) _ �� APPROVAL OF MINUTES & AGENDA FOR /. / O ` A) City Council Minutes for 20 January 2004 W B) City Council Agenda for 23 February 2004 GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS STAFF REPORTS CODES Leuthard Property `? Scruggs Junk Vehicle Wallin Junk Vehicle PUBLIC SAFETY A) Sheriff s Annual Crime Report — PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES OLD BUSINESS ROADS - Bennett Response To Otter Lake/Scheune n/Goose Lake Road Residents LAUNDERVILLE - Interim Use Permit Dd '� QPsGU • �:'d� : ���- Gaels' —)HUBBARD - Special Use Permit NEW BUSIN 'GARDNER MINOR SUBDIVISION fees /D2 e I O 1 F_ TREASURER'S REPORT X- 1�h10NTHS TREASURER'S REPORT ENT MONTHS ACCOUNTS PAYABLES UNSCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS -PRESENTATIONS FROM FLOOR (3 Minutes Maximum) FUTURE MEETINGS & ADJOURNMENT I FUTURE MEETINGS A) CITY CQUNCIL _ 1) C LAME ING: ASpecial-Meeting of the City -Council a e sll-b c�iedued fox -�� , and "Iiiafi be duly iub i� shed in a ne �eiiition of the Wtrife Bear Press Legal Section. The purpose of the meeting will be to 2) The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held at 7:00 p.m. on 15 March 2004. 3) The next.m etin is rescheduled to / / due.to_ ---�and is ordered published in the appropriate editio oftlie White Bear Press Legal Section. ADJOURNMENT: Motion By . Second By ,f A • Unanimous Vote & Emeott Approval at �•m. 1 G Page 1 0 f 1 f CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY, 2004 The February, 2004 meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 23 February 2004, at 8:45 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Council Members Watson, Igo, Birkebak and Bosak, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were several members of the community, Bryan Hansen and representatives of the I" Evangelical Free Church of Maplewood. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, the following actions were taken: 1) unanimous approval ofthe City Council Meeting Minutes for 20 January 2004 as presented on motion by Watson, second by Igo; and, 2) unanimous approval of the City Council Meeting Agenda as presented for 23 February 2004 on motion by Igo, second by Birkebak. Magnuson then presented General Announcements. Magnuson then reported on the Leuthard, Scruggs and Wallin notices of violation and efforts to abate same. Magnuson then identified November Meeting Minutes ofI-35E Corridor Management Group and Council confirmed electronic receipt. Magnuson then summarized the Sheriff s Annual Crime Report and the Council acknowledged receipt of minutes of the Sheriffs January meeting. The report will be maintained in the Sheriffs files. Magnuson then presented Commissioner Tony Bennett's response to the petitioners of Otter Lake, Goose Lake and Scheuneman Roads received last year with no action taken. Magnuson then reported he has spoken with Ron Launderville who indicates he has been unable to secure purchase rights to the Leuthard property and, therefore, he is unable to go forward with his development plans. Following Council discussion and upon motion by Igo and second by Watson, the Council voted unanimously (5 Aye / 0 Nay / 0 Abstentions) to deny the Application For a Special Use Permit submitted in 2003 by Ron Launderville (a/k/a/ Launderville Towing). Magnuson then presented Gardner's Application for Subdivision, stating that this is a minor subdivision which makes sense as the parcel defined to be subdivided is to be attached to the McNulty (f/k/a Bemis) property and is otherwise land locked. Both Magnuson and Emeott as Zoning Administrators have approved this subdivision and recommend the Council approve same, contingent upon Mr. Gardner filing a final plat with Ramsey County on or before 30 June 2004. Following Council discussion, motion by Bosak and second by Birkebak to approve Gardner's Application For Minor Subdivision contingent upon receipt by the City Clerk of verification of filing of final plat with Ramsey County on or before 30 June 2004 was unanimously approved. Motion by Bosak, second by Igo to approve Accounts Payable for January/February as prepared by Magnuson and totaling $19,849.88 was unanimously approved. Motion by Bosak, Second by Igo to accept the January Treasurer's Report as prepared by Cobian and indicating a balance in the General Fund of $71,714.65 and in the Sewer Fund of $44,674.57 was unanimously approved. Mayor Emeott then recognized the representatives of the 1 S` Evangelical Free Church who presented an overview of their desire to purchase the Hansen property (LDB) and build a new (mega) church indicating they would need several variances and approvals to move forward. Following questions, Mayor Emeott in his capacity as Zoning Administrator presented his written comments which are attached and will be retained in the file for the Hansen property. Following discussion, the Council consensus was that the matter be referred to the Planning Commission for consideration prior to Council consideration. Page 1 of 2 W There being no further business, motion by Birkebak, second by Igo to adjourn at 8:55 pm was unanimously approved. AUTHORED: 08 March 2004 APPROVED: 15 March 2004 ATTEST: ATTEST: G� Frederic C. V/non Paul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor efile: minutes/2004/164febm2004.wpd Page 2 of 2 J Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 Utz �/ownu.ron. Ci41 C/ei/r CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com fnau/(Gimeoff �oyoi DATE: 26 January 2004 FROM: Fritz Magnuson, Zoning Administrator Paul Emeott, Zoning Administrator TO: Gem Lake City Council CC: Gem Lake Planning Commission RE: Gardner Minor Subdivision Gentlemen, owl Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 cyamk6 Co6iors 91-= 1W On approximately 22 December 2003, I received via regular US Mail an Application For Subdivision from David K. Leslie D. Gardner. Following review, it was determined that the application qualified as a Minor Subdivision pursuant to provisions of Section 6 of Ordinance No. 58. Based upon this determination, procedures for same were implemented. Mr. Gardner was notified by telephone that the application was incomplete and required the following information to be considered complete: I . A completed survey of his entire property including both a description and an engineers rendering of the parcel. On 23 January 2004, said additional information was received, reviewed by Mayor Emeott and I in our capacity as Zoning Administrators and found to be complete. On 26 January 2004, a letter to Mr. Gardner indicated the application was now complete and that our recommendation that the City Council approve same would be sent for consideration at the 23 February 2004 City Council Meeting. Based upon identification of a complete application on 23 January 2004, we must act on this matter on or before 23 March 2004 to be in compliance with the "60 Day Rule". By means of this correspondence, we the undersigned acting in our capacity as Zoning Administrators recommend approval of the Application For (Minor) Subdivision submitted by David K. Gardner and Leslie D. Gardner. We further recommend that Final Approval be provided upon receipt by the City of verification of filing with Ramsey County Property Records And Revenue and amendment of property boundary lines by the City Engineer. Respectfully Submitted, Respectfully Submitted, CITY OF GEM LAKE CITY OF GEM LAKE F. C. ` ri gnuson Paul R. Emeott As Zoning dministrator As Zoning Administrator efle: Subdivision\2004L004-O)Gn'dnerMinor\ZoningAdmin040l26A.wpd Page 1 of 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF ANNUAL MEETING NPDES / MS4 / SWPPP 23 February 2004 The first annual Public Meeting of the City of Gem Lake to review the City's report of performance in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the related Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Phase II Permit which is guided by the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) was held on 23 February 2004. A Public Notice of the meeting was placed in the White Bear Press, the City's Legal Publication on 28 January 2004. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Watson, Igo, Birkebak and Bosak , and City Clerk Magnuson were present along with several members of the community. Mayor Emeott then made opening comments stating, for the record, that this hearing is required as part of our SWPPP to provide both education of City efforts to it's residents and to make known it's accomplishments, commitments and challenges. Mayor Emeott then presented the Agenda for the Public Meeting. Motion by Birkebak, Second by Igo to approve the Agenda for the Public Meeting was unanimously approved. Mr. Magnuson was then recognized. Mr. Magnuson presented the thirty-one (31) page Draft Annual Report summarizing the three (3) page formatted report and each of the twenty-eight (28) pages of criteria, allowing time for questions and answers from the City Council or those present. Following Mr. Magnuson's presentation, Mayor Emeott asked if there had been any written or oral input on the City's SWPPP for consideration and inclusion in the record and for consideration as changes to the City's SWPPP. Mr. Magnuson replied that no written or oral input had been received prior to convening this meeting. Mayor Emeott then asked if any Councilors wished to make comments with no response from the Councilors. Mayor Emeott then asked if anyone present wished to make comments with no response from those present. Mayor Emeott then declared that since there were no comments, no Record of Decision (ROD) would be required and no amendment of the SWPPP appeared necessary. There being no further business, the First Annual Public Meeting for review of the City's MS4 / SWPPP was adjourned at 8:45 PM. AUTHORED: 02 March 2004 APPROVED: 15 March 2004 ATTEST: ATTEST: Frederic uson Paul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor e-file: hearings\2004NPDESO40223A.wpd e-file:NPDES\NPDES2004HearingM.wpd Page 1 of 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING Continued From 18 February 2004 23 February 2004 A Public Hearing initially convened on 18 February 2004 before the Gem Lake Planning Commission and continued to this date by Planning Chairman Hoeschler was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 23 February 2004, at 7:07 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Igo, Watson, Bosak and Birkebak, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were Chairman Hoeschler and Mr. Lindner of the Planning Commission, Mr. McNulty and his consultants and several members of the community listed on the attached. Mayor Emeott then made opening comments stating, for the record, that this hearing is a continuation ofthe hearing originally convened before the Planning Commission to insure all interested members of the Gem Lake community had opportunity to be heard regarding the proposed subdivision of Hillary Farm by McNulty Construction Company. Mayor Emeott stated that Mr. McNulty has been working diligently to present alternative plans for the site for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council. Mayor Emeott then presented the Agenda for the continuation of the public hearing. Motion by Birkebak, Second by Igo to approve the Agenda for the Public Hearing was unanimously approved. The Clerk reported that the Notice of Public Hearing was duly published in the 04 February 2004 edition of the White Bear Press and that direct mail notification required for the proceeding had been completed coincidental to the legal notice publication. Mayor Emeott then indicated that while the required hearing for a subdivision was held before the Planning Commission, Bryan Hansen indicated at the January City Council meeting that he felt the City Council and not the Planning Commission should receive public comment. Following receipt of Mr. Hansen's comments, the City Council determined additional time to hear the matter could be made available on this date. The primary purpose of this continuation of the hearing is to receive comments from those who were not heard or could not attend the 18 February 2004 hearing. Mr. McNulty then presented to those present his concept plans identified as Plan `B", Plan "D" and Open Space Plan for discussion noting differences as well as the opportunities and challenges of both plans. Mayor Emeott then recognized Councilor Watson who asked for clarification of intent to sewer each or all plans to which Mr. McNulty responded only "D" and Open Space provided for sewer and `B" utilized ISTS. Bill John asked if any record of a 65' easement along the south edge of the golf course had been addressed and was advised that no such easement exists according to title searches ordered by McNulty. Bill John asked if zoning changes would be required for "D" or Open Space and the answer was yes. Bill John indicated he preferred the 3 acre zoning approved in recent years by the City but also supported bringing the sewer into the plan. Bill John also has concerns as he only recently replaced his ISTS and would not want additional costs at this time. Gary and Mary Limborg asked if road alignment with Scheuneman Road could be done in such a manner as to avoid direct headlights into homes on the east side of Scheunem- an Road to which McNulty responded yes this will be considered and can be accommodated. Discussion of traffic counts at approximately 250 trips per day (10 trips per day for 25 homes) for `B" clarified concerns by Hansen and corrected Hoeschler's notes regarding the hearing on 18 February 2004. Magnuson further noted that changes to Scheuneman Road would be Ramsey County concerns as they have not met Gem Lake's criteria for turn backs which, I turn, would allow for restructuring traffic patterns. Discussion ofgolfcourse concerns regarding potential damage to homes was discussed and warrants considerations of set -backs. Bosak discussed sewer versus density and alignment to avoid adverse impact on current residents. Hoeschler noted the City Engineer has recommended installation of sewer for all plans due to environmental concerns. Emeott noted similar concerns from VLAWMO along with concerns over bituminous curbs and buffers at wetlands to avoid fertilizer and other pollutants. Discussion of the possibility of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet followed as both the City Engineer and VLAWMO thought this might be considered depending upon sewer Page 1 of 2 and other considerations. Roger Anderson, McNulty's engineer stated that an EAW would be a waste oftime and money and noted our Ordinance provides foe the use of ISTS in 3 acre R-1 Residential Districts. Mr. McNulty moved that his application be declared complete, that soils are adequate for ISTS and can be done in accordance with City ordinances. Bill John asked why mound systems were shown, stating he believed these were used primarily in areas where soils would not support standard ISTS. Roger Anderson responded that plans for mounds were included as worst case scenarios and that where in ground systems were appropriate they would be employed. John then indicated a preference for 3 acre zoning and sewer. Ken Defiel was recognized and supported John's comments. Magnuson noted verbal comments received by Jule Hannaford, trustee for Jack Hannaford's property. Magnuson noted that only Hanson has submitted written comments regarding traffic discussed earlier. There being no further business, the Public Hearing was adjourned at 8:15 pm. AUTHORED: 02 March 2004 APPROVED: 15 March 2004 ATTEST Frederic C. a s City Clerk ATTEST: Paul R. Emeott Mayor e-file: hearings\2004\HillaryFarm040223A.wpd Page 2 of 2 ,nw�u Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 wiz �%ayauro� City C/eik David & Leslie Gardner 1430 North Tanque Verde Loop Road Tucson, AZ 85749 CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com fnau/limeorf �oyoi REF: Application For Minor Subdivision Dear David & Leslie, Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 �oio/> Ga6roq 9�?osvrei 08 March 2004 Pursuant to your submission of an Application For A Minor Subdivision, Mayor Emeott and I reviewed and presented same the City Council with our joint recommendation of approval. On 23 February 2004, the City Council unanimously approved your minor subdivision with the condition that you file a final play of same with Ramsey County and present evidence of the filing to my office on or before 30 June 2004. It is our understanding that if you fail to file the final plat by that date and do not further advise us of yourstatus that the subdivision approval will be nullified and the Council will take action accordingly. I have enclosed for your file the Minutes of the City Council Meeting on 23February 2004. Please note that these minutes are not official until approved on 15 March 2004 by the Council. If you have any comments or questions, please don't hesitate to call. Regards, CITY OF GEM LAKE F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk & Zoning Administrator encl. February Council Minutes cc: Mayor & Council Jim McNulty J efile: Subdivisiou\2004-01Gardner\ApprovalNotice0403O8A.wpd Page 1 of 4 !N CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com WqW&"4 Cry C/e k 9e,/ ieoN 9loyo. DATE: 26 January 2004 FROM: Fritz Magnuson Zoning Administrator J Paul Emeott, Zoning Administrator TO: Gem Lake City Council CC: Gem Lake Planning Commission RE: Gardner Minor Subdivision Gentlemen, I Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 Joio/> Co611114 �Tinoruirti On approximately 22 December 2003, I received via regular US Mail an Application For Subdivision from David K. & Leslie D. Gardner. Following review, it was determined that the application qualified as a Minor Subdivision pursuant to provisions of Section 6 of Ordinance No. 58. Based upon this determination, procedures for same were implemented. Mr. Gardner was notified by telephone that the application was incomplete and required the following information to be considered complete: 1. A completed survey of his entire property including both a description and an engineers rendering of the parcel. On 23 January 2004, said additional information was received, reviewed by Mayor Emeott and I in our capacity as Zoning Administrators and found to be complete. On 26 January 2004, a letter to Mr. Gardner indicated the application was now complete and that our recornmendation that the City Council approve same would be sent for consideration at the 23 February 2004 City Council Meeting. Based upon identification of a complete application on 23 January 2004, we must act on this matter on or before 23 March 2004 to be in compliance with the "60 Day Rule". By means of this correspondence, we the undersigned acting in our capacity as Zoning Administrators recommend approval of the Application For (Minor) Subdivision submitted by David K. Gardner and Leslie D. Gardner. We further recommend that Final Approval be provided upon receipt by the City of verification of filing with Ramsey County Property Records And Revenue and amendment of property boundary lines by the City Engineer. Respectfully Submitted, Respectfully Submitted, CITY OF GEM LAKE CITY OF GGE(/Ej{M LAKE & 3;X -,, I ✓ f�GIA� ✓ Ii. U/ 9%7ieo F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson Paul R. Emeott As Zoning Administrator As Zoning Administrator efile: Subdivision\2004\2004-01 GardnerMinor\ZoniugAdmin040126A.wpd Certif ieb IQJ*J�,O�B Page 2 of 4 rage i or i Subj: Church in LDB zoning area Date: 2/21/2004 8:54:27 PM Central Standard Time From: pem_eott@comcast _net To: GemLakeC&@aol.com CC: chwatson@ur.com, nrbosak visi.com, patio@creatiyeideations.com, rolbirkebak@ear_thlink.com Hi all, Here is my take on the locating of a Church in the LDB zoned area of the City of Gem Lake. The City Council has been notifed that the representatives of the Evangelical Free church are planning on attending the Feb City Council meeting next Monday. These two pages are planned as a "hand-out" to the church representatives for their consideration before the City Council meeting. Hopefully it will give them enough to think about that they will re -consider bypassing the normal path thru the Planning Commission for this effort. Paul Emeott - Mayor, City of Gem Lake P. S. I will send a copy of this to Bryan Hansen on Monday and not before. Monday, February 23, 2004 America Online: GemLakeCity City of Gem Lake, MN Office of the Zoning Administrator Building of a Church on land in and adjacent to the LDB Zoning District The LDB zoning district, in the City of Gem Lake, is an 11.64 acre parcel of property in the southeastern part of the city. It fronts on Country Rd. E and runs from the Tousley Ford employee parking lot driveway on the East to the Residential private driveway on the West. The original intention of the owner of this parcel of property was for it to be for the location of an "Office park". Some specifics of what the City of Gem Lake Zoning Ordinance describes for the LDB area include: 1) A Church or Synagogue is a permitted principal use in the LDB 11.64 acre parcel. 2) 45 % of the LDB zoning district should be open space which includes green areas and areas not covered by buildings, parking lots, access roads and storage areas. 6.4 acres (11.64 X 55 %) of space is available for buildings, parking lots, access roads and storage areas. 3) The hours or operation, for any business, in the LDB "office park" site are limited to be principally during the normal work week (7 AM to 7 PM Monday thru Friday). 4) Business uses involving regular as opposed to occasional activity on Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays or before 7 AM and/or after 7 I'M are not permitted. 5) Approvals for any use in this area (LDB Zoning Area) must be given in advance, by the Planning Commission, and must be: A) Generally compatible with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive plan of the City of Gem Lake and meet the Building Code. B) Must be environmentally sound, compatible with the adjacent land uses and zone, including sound, sight and smell and compatible with the type and volume of traffic upon adjacent roadways. C) Overall density of structures including parking area, walls and roadways, front ,side and rear yards must reflect the transitional nature of the LDB district from high density in Business districts to the low density of residential districts. The "City of Gem Lake Comprehensive plan", adopted in 1997, generally describes the same use of the LDB Zoning District as the Zoning Ordinance, but does suggest that: 1) Development consisting of "life cycle/condominium type residential (possibly cluster housing) with a density not exceeding one unit per acre would be considered in the LDB area. 2) At least 45 % green space shall be provided. (Any wetlands in this area may be considered as part of the green space). 3) All parking areas should be bermed and use natural barriers and be located away from the residential areas bordering on the north and west. 4) Automobile traffic from any business in this area must be channeled to County Rd E and not to the authorized private way serving the residences located on the north and westernly limit of this planning area. NOTES: 1) The 6 acre undeveloped residential area to the north of the LDB property and owned by the same owner as the LDB parcel is only zoned for "one -family detached dwellings. Two possible "Rl" 3 acre parcels of land might be available for residences. 2) No wetland del iniation has been done on the LDB parcel. There has been some Flooding reported in Vadnais Heights from outflow to the south from this LDB parcel in very heavy rains. Parts of the storm water drainage from this LDB parcel are included in both the VLAWMO and Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed districts. (LDBdistrict) Pagel of 2 2/20/04 City of Gem Lake, MN Office of the Zoning Administrator Alternate method to develop the LDB and adjacent R1 residential parcels for a Church An alternate method of planning for the possible construction of a Church on the 17.64 acre site, made up of the 11.64 LDB acreage and the 6.0 acres of RI residential land directly to the North of the LDB site, would be to request an "Institutional Overlay District" for the entire 17.64 acres. A Church is one of the permitted uses in an area to be defined for an Institutional Overlay. The Institutional Overlay is considered a "re -zoning" of a defined plat of land for a specific non-commercial purpose. A public hearing with its required notices is needed for this re -zoning. You probably should be talking to and getting the approval of the close -by residential property owners before you request such an action for a overlay district. There are some restrictions on this overlay district. These are: 1) The total lot coverage of all buildings and other structures shall not exceed 15 %. (17.64 X 15 % _ 2.65 acres). 2) The minimum open space requirements shall be 45 %, including green areas not covered by buildings, parking lots, access roads, storage areas or other areas covered by impervious surfaces. (17.64 X 45% = 7.94 acres). You would have 9.7 acres for your church, parking lots and access roads. 3) A plan review is needed before work is done on start of building or remodeling that will change the outside dimensions of any building or structure in the Institutional Overlay Area. 4) If the proposed building is not built within 12 months of the date of approval, the overlay shall expire. 5) The overlay district is only for the organization which applied for and received the permit for the overlay. No leases or subletting of the building or facilities operating on the Institutional Overlay is permitted All other conditions of use for the Institutional Overlay District are to be negotiated on a case -by -case basis by both the Planning Commission and the City Council after the public hearing is held. All storm water matters, for this parcel, must be approved in advance of issuing an Institutional Overlay permit by both the VLAWMO and Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed districts. References used: City of Gem Lake Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 43 with amendments thru 12/03 — Section 18 (LDB), Section 7 (RI Residential) and Section 20 (Institutional Overlay) City of Gem Lake Comprehensive Plan (adopted July 1997) - Section 5.3.4 Paul Emeott Zoning Adminstrator — City of Gem Lake (LDBdistrict) Page 2 of 2 2/20/04 b S 0UN'K TONY BENNETT BOARD OF RAMSEY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DISTRICT 1 JOE MURPHY ASSISTANT TO COMMISSIONER January 16, 2004 Fritz Magnuson City Clerk Gem Lake — City Hall 1369 East Co. Rd. E Gem Lake, MN 55110 Dear Fritz: 220 COURT HOUSE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 TEL. (651) 266-8350 FAX (651) 266-8370 l For your information, I sent each resident a letter (see attached) regarding their concerns. We have made the changes outlined in my letter, and, as of yet, have not heard from any of the residents since making the changes to Otter Lake Road. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-266-8355. Sincerely, Tony Bennett Ramsey County Commissioner District 1 TB:fjm Attachment J Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum o110% post consumer content U .4 W December 2, 2003 John and Dana Norris 4488 Otter Lake Road White Bear Township, MN 55110 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Norris: Thank you for your letter regarding Otter Lake Road between Highway 96 and Scheunenman Road. I have had our Traffic Engineer look at your concerns regarding this stretch of road. I have also spent several different days at different times observing it myself. It is my understanding that the Sheriff has also monitored the speeds in the 40 MPH section and found that most people were driving in the 40 — 45 MPH range. My background is 30 years in law enforcement so I am quite familiar with traffic problems. Stop signs do not necessarily slow people down. In fact, in a lot of cases, they create more accidents. As far as speed is concerned, it has been proven that people tend to drive a speed at which they feel somewhat comfortable. If the speed limit is too low, the only time they will drive that speed is when there is a law enforcement officer there to enforce it. Otherwise, they drive within their comfort zone. Having said that, I found that there are several things that I thought could be done immediately. I took our Traffic Engineer out there and here are some of the suggestions that we agreed to. I understand they will be done as soon as possible. 1. We will remove the southbound 40 MPH sign just south of Park Street. 2. We will ret-nove two of Lhe 35 i,4PH curve signs and replace them with 150 MPH curve signs on the sharper of the two curves. 3. We will move the southbound 40 MPH sign further south, to the beginning of the straight-away area. 4. We will stripe the southbound lane at Pine Street to include a right turn lane onto Pine Street. The issue regarding the stop signs at Goose Lake Road and Whitaker Avenue will be addressed based on warrant criteria established in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This will require some time as traffic counts need to be monitored. From my observations, I suspect that Goose Lake Road may ultimately qualify for a three-way stop after these studies have taken place. I am not sure about Whitaker Avenue. We will also do some speed studies along that stretch. Page Two December 2, 2003 With the new reduction of speed on the first curve, the change and relocation of speed signs along the rest of the road, and the possibility of stop signs at Scheuneman Road, there should be a marked improvement. In regards to the 25 MPH speed zones you referenced, they are only legal in the areas near schools -- and then, only when children are present. After further study, we may be able to make some additional changes. Please let me know if what we have done so far helps. Sincerely, Tony Bennett Ramsey County Commissioner District 1 TB:fjm cc: Dan Soler I-35E Corridor Management Team Meeting Notes Tuesday, November 18, 2003 Present: Bill Short, Glen Van Wormer, Ann Braden, Tim Benetti, Derek Wippich, Jim Robinson, Marc Goess (MnDOT), Jeff Gibbens (MnDOT), Rick Arnebeck (MnDOT), Joel Hanson (Little Canada), 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 8:35 a.m. 2. Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved as written 3. Approval of August 12, 2003 meeting minutes. The August minutes were changed to indicate that construction of the main component of the Unweave the Weave project will start in 2005 and is expected to be completed in 2007. 4. I/35El1-694 Commons Section (Unweave the Weave) Project Status Report In Frank Pafko's absence, Marc Goess briefed the committee on the status of the project. MnDOT has requested muncipal approval from Little Canada and Vadnais Heights. Vadnais Heights has an open house scheduled on December I" and Little Canada will hold a workshop on November 261h. These meetings will provide opportunities for residents to learn about the project and ask questions. A Vadnais Heights economic development group is raising questions regarding MnDOT's plants to mitigate impacts on businesses during construction. Marc said Kent Barnard, MnDOT would be a good contact on this topic, and his number is 651-582-1364. Three separate lettings have been scheduled: 1) February 27, 2004: The Edgerton Bridge and widening of the EB 694 bridge over Highway 61. MnDOT intends to finish this project by next Fall. 2) July 23, 2004: approaches to the Edgerton Bridge —some right of way easements still need to be acquired. 3) December 17, 2004: Remaining portion of the project, construction will begin in spring of 2005. Little Canada will have cost participation for the second and third lettings. Vadnais Heights' aesthetic enhancements for the bridge will require municipal agreement. Jeff explained that the municipal consent process is needed to obtain approval of the layout by communities directly impacted by the road improvement. In this case, only Vadnais Heights and Little Canada will need to give consent. Marc said there have been changes in the construction staging. In order to guarantee that the project could be complete in three years, the ramp from I-35E northbound to I-694 westbound must be --1 closed for a year. Therefore they will build a temporary ramp that will have its own ramp onto the Edgerton Bridge. (Maps were referenced in order to describe how the detour would operate.) 800 to 1200 vehicles are expected to use the "Edgerton bypass". It is also hoped that the TH 61/CR E interchange will be completed next year. Mike Eng (MnDOT) needs to connect with Dan Soler about this. Glen said he would try to get them together. Transit mitigation is also needed. MnDOT, Metro Transit and the Ramsey County Regional Authority staff have met to develop a plan. MT concluded that this project won't really affect transit to downtown Minneapolis, but service to St. Paul will require six more daily bus trips (3 morning and 3 evening express trips.) $600,00 per year for additional buses is needed but is not included in MnDOT's budget. They are also looking for accessible, vacant or underused land between CR E and Hwy 96 for a park and ride lot. Tim suggested that Wall Mart be contacted to see if a portion of their lot could be used. MnDOT is hoping the legislature will provide funds for transit mitigation and asked the cities to support it. The I-35E southbound to I-94 eastbound ramp will be shut down about the end of the first year of construction. This will affect Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake and White Bear Lake. Gem Lake has submitted a cooperative agreement request for improvements from CR E to southbound 61. _ The committee discussed issues related to traffic impacts on local streets as a consequence of the project. Construction of the LaBore Road connection through Structural Wood has not been scheduled. Joel said Little Canada's biggest concern is that Traffic from Highway 96 that will be going down La Bore Road and on to local streets. Traffic mitigation is still a major concern of the city's, since the Rice Street Bridge is not scheduled to be done in the near future. Marc said Ramsey County hasn't officially delayed the Rice Street project, but if delayed, it will be constructed after Unweave the Weave. MnDOT could rebuild the interchange when I-694 is expanded to six lanes (maybe in 2013). Glen said he could address some of Little Canada's concerns. Bill said ramp closings would require a traffic management plan to address impacts of diverted traffic on local and county roads. Bill expected that such a plan would have been done by now. Jeff said the Traffic Control Plan deals with signage, and is not the same as a Traffic Management Plan. He said that he and Marc would contact the traffic office and see if someone from that department could attend the February meeting. The traffic staff will also be at the open house and workshop in Little Canada and Vadnais Heights. Tim showed the group the proposed "aesthetic design treatment" for the Edgerton Bridge. The arrangement of the vertical rails symbolizes waves of grain. The concrete facing below the railing will be "embossed" with various designs. Special tube lighting will also be used long the bridge. Rick asked whether green and white directional signs will be Ir - hung from the bridge, and pointed out, that if so, they would probably cover much of the design treatment. Tim said he would make further inquiries into that. 7. I-35 Corridor Study Rick Arnebeck, MnDOT Area B Manager, gave a brief presentation on the I-35 Corridor Study from I-694 to Hinckley. He said the corridor is growing and a number of specific studies have been completed or are underway (He distributed a map showing the various studies.) MnDOT needs to put a level of coordination to this work and develop an agreed to vision for the corridor for 2030. MnDOT proposes to inventory recent and active growth/development/traffic studies; evaluate for overlap/gaps/consistency; coordinate activities and study work along the corridor. They plan to identify 2030 growth demands on the transportation system, develop recommendations and design concepts for the intermediate and long terms and develop an action plan and timeline recommendations. He said this will need to be a partnership effort to be successful. They hope to begin study activities and recruit a consultant to provide overall planning and study coordinate by January. Rick asked that a representative from the I-35E CMT serve on the I-35 oversight committee. It will involve 3 to 4 meetings over the next 18 months. Funding has been set aside for this. Jim Robinson suggested that Dan Soler repreent the I-35E CMT on the group. Bill agreed to call him. If Dan doesn't want to participate in this opportunity Tim said he is willing to serve. 8. Corridor Development Derek said Gem Lake has not yet received an actual development proposal yet. But the project is expected to have 20-30 high -end homes on 87 acres; five lots will be on the lake. The city would need to extend utilities to serve the development. The city did a traffic study on the Scheunemann Road entrance to highway 61 where the visibility is poor. Gem Lake and Ramsey County will correct it. Jim said White Bear Lake has approved the Haskell's Liquor Store next to the Burger King. The Bremer Bank is open. The former Home Depot site has been sold to Mark of Excellence Homes for an Office/warehouse development with a retail element. No plan amendemnt will be needed. Tim reported that Pat Goff pulled the Arcade estates project and he now wants to do six, 48-unit apartment buildings, four on the eastside of Arcade at Market rate rental, and 2 on the west side of Arcade (senior housing). The Green Valley Nursery site north of I-694/1-35E is trying to make drainage work. MnDOT will help out. 105 units of apartments and 60 townhomes are planned for the site. According to Tim the only available developable land left in Vadnais Heights is zoned for multi -family. N W The New Image Fitness site has been sold. No new design has yet been proposed. The city has been working with the County to improve (signalize) the Kohler Road and CR E intersection. The County will provide sidewalks on either side of CR E. If the Centerville trail is approved it will be one of the last trail connections made. A proposed plan amendment for a 100 unit affordable housing apartment complex at the end of Talmage Circle is going to the Planning Commission for approval. Tim said even though the building design looks great, he expects there will be opposition to it. A traffic analysis per the corridor study will be needed. In North Oaks Presbyterian Homes is constructing a 72 townhouses and 36 single family homes. 9. Election of Officers for Next year Bill and Ann were unanimously elected to serve, respectively, as Chair and Recording Secretary for the I-35E CMT for 2004. 10. SEH Proposal for Continued Consulting Services Glen proposed to keep the budget ($4,500) the same for next year. He thinks traffic mitigation work may be needed and may cost as much as $2000. He will resubmit last year's resolution to the cities. The goal is to have all participating cities approve the Jresolution before the February meeting. 11. Other Business and Adjournment Marc said that in 2009 MnDOT is planning to reconstruct I-35E from I-94 to Maryland. St. Paul has asked for aesthetic design guidance committee. MnDOT will be requesting communities to have a representative on it. Ann mentioned that Georgeanne Hilker is the new Metro Council representative for most of the cities in the corridor. There being no other business, the meeting ended at 10:50. Prepared by, Arm Braden J Page 1 of 1 Subj: Special Feb. 18, 2004 Planning Commission Mtg re Hillary Farm Date: 2/19/2004 8:55:27 AM Central Standard Time From JGHOES_CHLER@comcast.net To: pemeott@attbi.com, gemlakecity@aol.com, ehwatsonQur.co , nrbosak isi.co , patigo@creativeideations.com, abecicka@aol.com, wip icpp hfamily@msn.com, lindnerj@facm._umn.edu CC: pn3@I_osgs.com, _mail mcnultyhomes.com, bryanhansen@sb_gc lobal.net, JGHoeschler@comcast.net Gentlemen and Mrs. Robins (and would Fritz please send the hard copy to Mrs Robins and any Council members not on email): Attached are my minutes from the public hearing held last night by the Planning Commission regarding the McNulty proposal for Hillary Farm. Jack Hoeschler JGHoeschler@comcast.net John G. Hoeschler, P.A. 800 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 P: 651-683-1868 F: 651-681-6822 C: 651-324-1694 Saturday, February 21, 2004 America Online: GemLakeCity Fritz, would you please email this to the City Council: Page 1 of 2 Subj: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for February 3, 2004 Date: 2/5/2004 6:11:26 PM Central Standard Time From. _JGHOESCHLER@comcast.net To: gemlakecityaol.com, pemeott@attbi.com, abecicka@aol.com, wippichfamily_@msn.com, lind.nerj@facm,umn :edu CC mail@mcnul homes.com, bU;tnhansen@sbcglobal_net, Gret-chenas@Mn.mediaone.net Fritz, would you please email this to the City Council: Memo to Mayor Emeott: From: Jack Hoeschler, Chairman Date: February 5, 2004 Re: Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting of February 3, 2004 The Gem Lake Planning Commission held its regular February meeting at Tousley Ford on Tuesday, February 3, 2004 and all members were present along with Fritz Magnuson and Paul Emeott acting as co -zoning administrators. Other guests were also present along with the McNulty team. The first item of business was a report by Mr. Becicka that he is awaiting comments by the City Attorney on his draft of the adult use ordinance. We expect to review that in further detail once we have those comments. The next item of business was a review of the McNulty submissions regarding Hillary Farm. There is a formal application for consideration of a plat showing 3 acre lots throughout except for one lot along Scheuneman Road. There is another application for a mixed open space, 1acre and 3acre plat which has been submitted in the alternative. Mr. McNulty briefly described both proposals and then Mr. Magnuson and Mr. Emeott gave their reviews of the submissions in their roles as co -zoning administrators. The administrators reported that they have given a letter to Mr. McNulty listing the items needed for his submission to be considered complete and for the 60 day clock to start to run. After a discussion of some of the technical issues raised by the administrative review, there was a fairly free ranging question and answer session during which several points were made. The Swomleys stated a strong preference for the straight 3 acre plat approach (Plan B). There was significant discussion of the City's requirement that septic fields be located at least 200 feet back from the lake. The Chairman asked Mr. McNulty's engineer to review the impact of having all drain fields back at least 200 feet with none on the property of a neighbor (as is shown in one case). The impact of the tree ordinance was also discussed and the Chairman indicated that the Commission preferred to solve the tree issues with the developer rather than have those issues shifted down to the individual lot buyers who are harder to deal with. Mr. Emeott spoke in favor of a plan that would have all of the lots served by sewer. Currently the alternative proposal has sewer but there was concern expressed by several with the one acre lots in that plan. Mr. Wippich suggested that if the sewer were added to Plan B (the 3 acre lot plan), perhaps the easterly half of the alternative plan could be grafted onto Plan B with the result that the open space in the SE quarter would be retained, some one acre or some duplex lots could be shown in the NE quarter and the rest of the Plat would have 3 acre lots as shown on Plan B. This would result in a total lot count of 31, sewer for all, open space along Sheuneman Road, and large lots along the lake and the westerly boundary that would be consistent with existing patterns there. Mr. Hoeschler and Mr. Emeott stated that that approach was what they had suggested in earlier meetings with the McNulty team. There was some enthusiasm for this approach expressed by others but Mr McNulty is yet to be heard from in this regard. The next meeting on this subject will be a formal public hearing on the 181th of February followed by the regular March meeting. We had to leave due to the closing of the building shortly after 9 pm. Jack Hoeschler ,JGHoeschler@conicast.net John G. Hoeschler, P.A. 800 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 P:651-683-1868 Friday, February 06, 2004 America Online: GemLakeCity PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES - HILLARY FARM SUBDIVISION Memo to: Paul Emeott From: Jack Hoeschler, Chair Re: Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting February 18, 2004 Date: February 19, 2004 The Gem Lake Planning Commission held a special meeting at 7 pm on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at Tousley Ford pursuant to published notice to receive public comments regarding the McNulty proposals for the Bemis Property (Hillary Farm at Gem Lake). All members except Mrs. Robins were present along with Messrs. Emeott and Magnuson as co -zoning administrators. Numerous members of the public were also present along with Mr. McNulty and members of his team. The Chairman opened the meeting by giving a brief description of the nature and status of the process, the way the meeting will be conducted and an introduction of key individuals. He then asked Mr. McNulty to give a brief overview of his primary (25 lots mostly 3 acres except for the estate lot and one 36,000 SF lot on Scheuneman) and alternative (49 units on 33 lots) proposals, which he did. Mr. Emeott then gave a brief report on the VLAWMO review of the project (which urged use of public sanitary sewer instead of septic systems, monumented no -cut areas around wetlands, and avoiding any impact on wetlands by driveways). Various residents then asked questions and/or raised a number of points including the following: • The open space provided in the alternate plan will not be public but rather owned and maintained by the Home Owners Association. After 30 years there is some risk that that use may change. The claimed open space (42.9 acres) seriously overstates the reality. • The so-called open space plan places the houses too close to the golf course and this will likely result in conflicts from errant balls. • Each lot will generate about 10 trips per day (per the developer's engineer) and thus the traffic on Scheuneman Road will increase by about 25%. It was suggested that is possible that the two entries and the additional traffic will actually slow traffic on Scheuneman. J • The developer confirmed that only riparian lots would have access to the Lake. The present irrigation pump from the lake will be removed and the duck pond south of the main house will be filled by the well at the main house. • The so-called open space plan will have 49 homes on 33 lots and most attendees were unhappy with that type of density even though it would have public sewer and leave the southeast quadrant undeveloped. • The prospect or danger of further subdivision of the three acre lots on the primary plan was raised and briefly discussed. • Bryan Hansen spoke strongly in favor of the need for public sewer but said that he thought the developer was capable of a better plan. A straw vote of the public present at the meeting was held to get an indication of whether any of the various proposals had predominant support. It was clear that a vast majority of the public present preferred the standard 3 acre proposal over the more dense alternatives. The chairman announced that the public hearing would be continued to the Council meeting next Monday, February 23, to allow others to express their opinions on this important project. The Planning Commission will meet again on Tuesday, March 3, to begin detailed discussions of the terms of a Developer's Agreement and other requirements for any development. He indicated that there would be more detailed analysis of the implications of the septic system proposal for the 3 acre layout since there was great concern that we not be simply delaying greater problems later. J CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING Continued From 18 February 2004 23 February 2004 A Public Hearing initially convened on 18 February 2004 before the Gem Lake Planning Commission and continued to this date by Planning Chairman Hoeschler was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 23 February 2004, at 7:07 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Igo, Watson, Bosak and Birkebak, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were Chair- man Hoeschler and Mr. Lindner of the Planning Commission, Mr. McNulty and his consultants and several members of the community as listed on the attached. Mayor Emeott then made opening comments stating, for the record, that this hearing is a continuation of the hearing originally convened before the Planning Commission to insure all interested members of the Gem Lake community had opportunity to be heard regarding the proposed subdivision of Hillary Farm by McNulty Construction Company. Mayor Emeott stated that Mr. McNulty has been working diligently to present alternative plans for the site for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council. Mayor Emeott then presented the Agenda for the continuation of the public hearing. Motion by Birkebak, Second by Igo to approve the Agenda for the Public Hearing was unanimously approved The Clerk reported that the Notice of Public Hearing was duly published in the 04 February 2004 edition of the White Bear Press and that direct mail notification required for the proceeding had been com- pleted coincidental to the legal notice publication. Mayor Emeott then indicated that while the required hearing for a subdivision was held before the Planning Commission, Bryan Hansen indicated at the January City Council meeting that he felt the City Council and not the Planning Commission should receive public comment. Following receipt of Mr. Hansen's comments, the City Council determined additional time to hear the matter could be made avail- able on this date. The primary purpose of this continuation of the hearing is to receive comments from those 1 who were not heard or could not attend the 18 February 2004 hearing. Mr. McNulty then presented to those present his concept plans identified as Plan `B", Plan "D" and Open Space Plan for discussion noting differences as well as the opportunities and challenges of both plans. Mayor Emeott then recognized Councilor Watson who asked for clarification of intent to sewer each or all plans to which McNulty responded only "D" and Open Space provided for sewer and "B" utilized ISTS. Bill John asked if any record of a 65' easement along the south edge of the golf course had been addressed and was advised that no such easement exists according to title searches ordered by McNulty. Bill John asked if zoning changes would be required for "D" or Open Space and the answer was yes. Bill John indicated he preferred the 3 acre zoning approved in recent years by the City but also supported bring- ing the sewer into the plan. Bill John also has concerns as he only recently replaced his ISTS and would not want additional costs at this time. Gary and Mary Limborg asked if road alignment with Scheuneman Road could be done in such a manner as to avoid direct headlights into homes on the east side of Scheuneman Road to which McNulty responded yes this will be considered and can be accommodated. Discussion of traffic counts at approximately 250 trips per day (10 trips per day for 25 homes) for "B" clarified concerns by Hanson and corrected Hoeschler's notes regarding the hearing on 18 February 2004. Magnuson further noted that changes to Scheuneman Road would be Ramsey County concerns as they have not met Gem Lake's criteria for turn backs which, in turn, would allow for restructuring traffic patterns. Discussion of golf course concerns regarding potential damage to homes was discussed and warrants considerations of set -backs. Bosak discussed sewer versus density and alignment to avoid adverse impact on current residents Hoeschler noted the City Engineer has recommended installation of sewer for all plans due to environ- mental concerns. Emeott noted similar concerns from VLAWMO along with concerns over bituminous curbs and buffers at wetlands to avoid fertilizer and other pollutants. Discussion of the possibility of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet followed as both the City Engineer and VLAWMO thought this Page 3 of 4 might be considered depending upon sewer and other considerations. Roger Anderson, McNulty's engineer stated that an EAW would be a waste of time and money and noted our Ordinance provides for the use of ISTS in 3 acre R-1 Residential Districts. Mr. McNulty moved that his application be declared complete, that soils are adequate for ISTS and can be done in accordance with City ordinances. Bill John asked why mound systems were shown, stating he believed these were used primarily in areas where soils would not support standard ISTS. Roger Anderson responded that plans for mounds were included as worst case scenarios and that where in ground systems were appropriate they would be em- ployed. John then indicated a preference for 3 acre zoning and sewer. Ken Defiel was recognized and supported John's comments. Magnuson noted verbal comments received by Jule Hannaford, trustee for Jack Hannaford's property. Magnuson noted that only Hanson has submitted written comments regarding traffic discussed earlier. There being no further business, the Public Hearing was adjourned at 8:15 pm. AUTHORED: 02 March 2004 APPROVED: 15 March 2004 ATTEST: G� a Afary`u Frederic C. Magnuson City Clerk J AnTTES/T: n-- R. Paul R. Emeott Mayor e-file: hearings\2004\HillaryFarm040223A.wpd Page 4 of 4 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONTRACT COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE MONTHLY MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 2004 CITY OF SHOREVIEW — COUNCIL CHAMBERS ************8.00 A.M.************ 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Minutes of January 22, 2004 3. Approve Agenda 4. Animal Control Report — Rick Ruzicka 5. Weight Restrictions -Enforcement Update -Tim Entner 6. 2005 Budget -1st Draft — George Altendorfer 7. 2003 Fine Revenues — George Altendorfer 8. Discussion regarding Special Event Staffing — George Altendorfer 9. Arden Hills Police Service Update Michelle Wolff 10. 800 MHZ Update 11. Other Issues — Bill Short 12. Adjournment j MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE JURISDICTIONS THAT CONTRACT WITH RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR POLICE SERVICES JANUARY 22, 2004 The meeting was called to order at 8:03 a.m. The following members were present: ➢ George Altendorfer, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ➢ Kathy Glanzer, City of Little Canada ➢ John Luey, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ➢ Jim March, City of North Oaks Jan Reagan, White Bear Township ➢ Mike Salter, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ➢ Terry Schwerm, City of Shoreview ➢ Bill Short, White Bear Township ➢ Gerry Urban, City of Vadnais Heights ➢ Michelle Wolfe, City of Arden Hills APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved, shifting Agenda Item #8 (800 MHz), to discussion after Agenda Item #4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes of December 18, 2003, were approved as written. APPROVAL OF 2004 MEETING SCHEDULE & AGENDAS The 2004 Meeting Schedule & Agendas was approved as submitted. Schwerm noted that all meetings will begin at 8:00 a.m. 800 MHz Luey reported that he is a member of an 800 MHz team, whose purpose is to advise the County Board. He encouraged the cities to let Paul Kirkwald, Project Manager, Ramsey County 800 MHz, know of their level of service concerns relating to consolidation of the communication center. He noted that there is a strict timeline for the 800 MHz, which is linked to a grant. He stated that he believes that there is a March or April deadline to advise the Policy Committee on the number of recommended dispatch centers. Urban noted that he likes the idea of a potential link to other counties in the Metro area. Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting January 22, 2004 The Group advised Luey to let them know if he needs representation from any of the contract communities or elected officials. Schwerm noted that their Fire Chief is opposed to a consolidated communication center. Schwerm stated his opinion that if Maplewood and White Bear Lake still want their own communication centers, it is a service decision for them, however they should implement 800 MHz. TRAFFIC DEPUTY YEAR END REPORT Deputy Tim Entner distributed the Year -End Traffic Report. He reminded the Group that there will not be a Safe & Sober Grant next year. He stated that he will be able to reapply for the grant for an additional three years, after taking one year off. He reported that he won another laser (approximately $3,500.00 value), through a prize drawing. Urban requested information on cameras that are mounted at intersections, suggesting their effectiveness, if only for warnings (i.e. the running of red lights). Schwerm noted that private companies have been hired in other states, to take photos, identifying problem intersections. Altendorfer cited the public debate with regard to how much monitoring is being done. There was discussion with regard to the effectiveness of large speed boards. Altendorfer noted that electricity must be available to plug in these units. It was stated that the boards on Snelling Avenue are very effective in slowing traffic down to the speed change. Altendorfer felt that the boards would be more appropriate on County roads where there is higher volume. He will check on the cost of the boards, including smaller, portable units with batteries. Altendorfer discussed the possibility of replacement of one of the older speed carts, stating concern about high maintenance costs. He reported that the oldest cart is nine or ten years old, and that the new carts are less expensive, more efficient, easier to set up, and more user friendly. He stated that he will continue to explore the purchase and look for funding. Portable speed boards that can be attached to the back of a squad cars were discussed. Their cost is believed to be approximately $3,000.00 — $3,500.00. These boards must be attached to something, and most agencies put them on a back-up squad car and park it somewhere. Entner stated that he will check with the City of Blaine where he believes that their Public Works Department has installed posts in different areas where they place speed boards as needed. He will report back at a future meeting. It was noted that the budget reflects savings calculated to a 0% increase for 2005, due to salary projections based on less senior personnel, as the years of service will drop. 2 Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting January 22, 2004 Urban asked about the calculations used for the gas budget. Altendorfer explained that they are usually based on the previous year, with a small increase. FOURTH QUARTER CRIME STATISTICS Altendorfer distributed the Fourth Quarter Crime Statistic Report. He noted that mail theft and theft from autos are both up again, which is primarily associated with identity theft. Short reported that he had just viewed a commercial on identity theft where it was recommended to place mail in the blue boxes, and not to place it in your own mail box with the flag up. It was reported that the Post Office has been eliminating mail drop boxes. Urban suggested that this be a future agenda topic, and that the postmasters be invited to a meeting. Altendorfer reviewed some of the current cases under investigation, reporting that the Investigations Unit is nearing completion of the Thomas Cady homicide in Little Canada, which he noted has over 1,000 hours of investigative effort. He reviewed the recent armed robbery at the Arden Hills TCF, reporting that a similar incidents have been occurring throughout the metro area, and a suspect has been identified. ARDEN HILLS POLICE SERVICE Wolfe reported that the Arden Hills Council Members will discuss their next step at an annual retreat this Friday and Saturday. She stated that she should know the steps on Monday, and if they will need the additional 30 days. She noted that last weeks presentation by the Sheriff's Department went well and that the City Council was receptive to the information. Altendorfer noted that if Arden Hills chooses to leave the Group, it will result in serious staffing issues, since it involves seven positions. LONG RANGE PLANNING The Group decided that this matter should be discussed after Arden Hills decides if they are still going to be a part of the Contract Group. It was suggested that it be scheduled on the April agenda. Urban suggested that each community think about what they feel will be needed during the next five years. 3 Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting January 22, 2004 Urban asked who was on the e-mail list to receive the Community Watch Reports (i.e., Neighborhood Block Watch Captains). Altendorfer will provide this information at the next meeting. Short requested a decision from North Oaks with regard to the additional overnight deputy to be shared between the Township, North Oaks, and Vadnais Heights, noting his need to report at the Town's Annual Meeting on March 9"'. March stated that the position is in the North Oaks' City Budget, but that a date has not been discussed, and that he would place the matter on an upcoming City Council Agenda. Urban noted that May 1st had been previously set as the starting date. Altendorfer noted that the position will require at least a three month training period. OTHER ITEMS Altendorfer distributed the 2003 Municipal Sharing Totals from Fines Report, which represents all of the fine revenue that comes through the courts and back to each community (includes state patrol citations). He noted that it does not include the sale of cars revenue, which is paid directly. The Group requested that Altendorfer provide a five-year trend report. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:32 a.m. The next regular meeting will be held on FEBRUARY 19, at 8:00 A.M., at the CITY OF SHOREVIEW CONFERENCE ROOM. Respectfully submitted, Jan Reagan Recording Secretary JAR/ 4 CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF ANNUAL MEETING NPDES / MS4 / SWPPP 23 February 2004 The first annual Public Meeting of the City of Gem Lake to review the City's report of performance in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the related Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Phase 11 Permit which is guided by the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program SWPPP) was held on 23 February 2004. A Public Notice of the meeting was placed in the White Bear Press, the City's Legal Publication on 28 January2004. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Watson, Igo, Birkebak and Bosak, and CityClerk Magnuson were present along with several members of the community. Mayor Emeott then made opening comments stating, for the record, that this hearing is required as part of our SWPPP to provide both education of City efforts to it's residents and to make known it's accomplishments, commitments and challenges. Mayor Emeott then presented the Agenda for the Public Meeting. Motion by Birkebak, Second by Igo to approve the Agenda for the Public Meeting was unanimously approved. Mr. Magnuson was then recognized. Mr. Magnuson presented the thirty-one (31) page Draft Annual Report, summarizing the three (3) page formatted report and each of the twenty-eight (28)pages of criteria, allowing time for questions and answers from the City Council or those present. Following Mr. Magnuson's presentation, Mayor Emeott asked if there had been any written or oral input on the City's SWPPP for consideration and inclusion in the record and for consideration as changes to the City's SWPPP. Mr. Magnuson replied that no written or oral input had been received prior to convening this meeting. MayorEmeott then asked if any Councilors wished to make comments with no response from the Councilors. Mayor Emeott then asked if anyone present wished to make comments with no response from those present. Mayor Emeott then declared that since there were no comments, no Record of Decision (ROD) would be required and no amendment of the SWPPP appeared necessary. There being no further business, the First Annual Public Meeting for review of the City's MS$ / SWPPP was adjourned at 8:45 PM. AUTHORED: 02 March 2004 APPROVED: 15 March 2004 ATTEST: TES �-TEST: ,�A ATTEST: n R. Frederic C. Magnuson Paul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor e-file: 11earings\2004\NPDESO40223A.wpd efile: NPDES\2004Hearing&Report\NPDES2004HearingM.wpd Page 1 of 1 CITY OF GEM LAKE 2003 SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS (MS4s) ANNUAL REPORT Due 10 March 2004 By completing this annual report form, you are "providing the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with a summary ofyour status of compliance with permit conditions, including an assessment of the appropriateness of your identified best managem entpractices and progress toward achievingyour identified measurable goals for each of the minimum control measures" as required by the MS4 Permit. Use of this form is not mandatory; however, you must address all the questions in similar format. Name of MS4 City of Gem Lake Contact Person Frederic C. Magnuson Telephone Number(s) Telephone: 651.426.6443 Facsimile: 651.426.6444 Mailing Address 1369 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email Address GemLakeCity@aol.eom Permit Conditions 1. a. Did you hold a public meeting on your Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP)? [Part V.G.I.e] YES b. What was the date of the public meeting? 23 February 2004 c. In what newspaper or publication of general interest did you publish the public notice of your meeting? [Part V.G.I.e.2] White Bear Press d. On what date was it published? A copy has been retained in City records. 28 January 2004 2. a. During your public meeting, did you receive written and/or oral input on your SWPPP? [Part V.G.2.b.1-3]. Inputmustbe considered prior to submittal of your annual report. NO b. Did you create a record of comments and your response to comments/record of decision (ROD)? YES (As Minutes) c. Have you kept the ROD in accordance with the permit? [Part V.G.2.b] YES (As Minutes) d. Do you plan to incorporate any comments into your next SWPPP update? [Part V.G.2.c] None To Incorporate 3. a. Did you identify and inspect all of your structural pollution control devices such as trap manholes, grit chambers, sumps, floatable skimmers and separators, etc? [Part V.G.6.b.2] YES b. How many structural pollution control devices do you have in your MS4 system? 0 c. How many structural pollution control devices did you inspect? 0 Page 1 d. What percentage is this? 100% 4. a. Did you repair, replace, or maintain any structural pollution control devices? NO b. Briefly Summarize any significant unscheduled (non routine) maintenance or improvement activities stemming from inspections of your structural pollution control devices. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NONE 5. a. Did you identify and inspect at least 20% of your outfalls, sediment basins, and ponds? [Part V.G.6.b.3] YES b. How many outfalls, basins and ponds do you have? 10 Outfalls 0 Basins 26 Ponds c. Indicate if this number is known or estimated? Estimated d. How many outfalls, sediment basins, or ponds did you inspect? 7 e. What percentage is this? 26% f. Briefly summarize the dates of completion of major additional protection measures triggered by your inspections. [Part V.G.6.b.41. None 6. a. Did you make a change to any identified best management practices or measurable goals that were submitted with your permit application? [Part V.G.6.b.1] NO NOTE: At this time, it is not necessary to revise your SWPPP to describe all operational and maintenance storm water activities you plan to undertake during the next reporting cycle. As you know, a May, 2003 decision by the Minnesota Court of Appeals remanded portions of the MS4 general permit back to the MPCA for modification. MPCA has been working on changes to the permit. The MPCA intends to modify the permit in the spring, 2004. After the modified permit is approved by the MPCA Citizens' Board, MPCA staff will send a letter to MS4 permittees that addresses the process for SWPPP approval and the MPCA state-wide public notice fo each MS4 SWPPP. Your revised SWPPP will bedue approximately 90 days after the modified permit is issued. b. Briefly list the best management practices using their unique identification numbers you used in your permit application or any measurable goals that were changed. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. See attached 7. a. Did you rely on any other entities to satisfy any portion of your SWPPP? YES 8. a. Do you discharge to waters with a restricted discharge? See Appendix C Part B; you may view the applicable rules at www.pca.state.mn.us/waters/water mnmles.html NO Page 2 Theperson with overall administrative responsibility for SWPPP implementation must sign the Annual Report. This person must be duly authorized and should be the person who signed the MS4 permit application or a successor. I certify under penalty oflaw that this docum ent and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete (Minn. R. 7001.0070). I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment (Minn. R. 7001.0540). Authorized Signature Duly autWrized to submit the Annual Report) Magnuson Frederic C. City Clerk Last Name First Name Middle Initial Title -7 Z�Za Date 1369 East County Road E Gem Lake Ramsey MN 551 1 q - 5231 Street Address City County State Zap + 4 ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 GemLakeCitv(a-).aol.com Telephone Facsimile Email Address This report should be submitted by 10 March 2004 to: MS4 Storm Water Program Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 - 4194 Page 3 CITY OF GEM LAKE Ramsey County, Minnesota ANNUAL COMMUNITY NOTICE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM (SWPPP) Page 4 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 1-01-R B. Name or Type of BMP: City Storm Water Education Program C. BMP Description: The City's education program consists of the activities listed in BMP's 1-02-R to 1-04-R, -01-R, 3-01-R, 4-01-R,5-01-R and 6-01-R as described in the BMP summary sheets attached to the City's Permit No. R040000 (Noticed As MN R580000). D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Public Education & Outreach 1. Establish methods to track and record efforts of a public outreach program for each of the six minimum control measures. 2. Create and maintain a City managed website. E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine successor benefits of this BMP: 1. Completion of electronic business inventory by property owner, tenant and business description data base. 2. Completion of electronic residential property owner database for delivery of survey and educational materials. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Business inventory was completed in September, 2003 and will be converted to NPDES Data Base by 01 April 2004. 2. Residential inventory update has been ordered from Ramsey County. Upon receipt it will be converted to General Information Data Base and then to NPDES Data Base by 01 May 2004. 3. W ebsite design to begin in June, 2004 following selection of designer and content discussion. Time line for completion will be vendor determined. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In September, 2003 an electronic business inventory was completed and is in the process of being converted to usable NPDES format. 2. In February, 2004 an updated electronic data base of all property owners in the City was ordered from Ramsey County Property Records to insure current accuracy. 3. In September, 2004 the existing electronic data base of all property owners in the City was formatted to include information important to NPDES and infrastructure development. 4. Candidates for web site development interviewed in October, 2003 and the selection process is pending. Selection process should be complete by 01 June 2004. j Page 5 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 S WPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 1-02-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Annual Public/City Council Meeting C. BMP Description: The City's annual public meeting to present progress to date on the City's SWPPP for the current year and required activities for the following year having employed applicable public notice procedures and soliciting public comments. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Public Education & Outreach 1. Publish public notice of meeting and solicit comments. 2. Prepare an agenda for approval which includes statement of need and intent, progress reports, pending and future plans for completion, and a copy of the draft report. 3. Hold the hearing on a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine successor benefits of this BMP: 1. 2. Completion of electronic residential property owner database for delivery of survey and educational materials. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. The public notice should be published in January, 2004. 2. The meeting should be scheduled for February, 2004. 3. The Draft Report should be available at the meeting. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. On 28 January 2004 a Public Notice No. 2004-03 was published in the Legal Notices Section of the White Bear Press, the City's official legal publication soliciting attendance and input. 2. On 23 February 2004 a Public Hearing was convened in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford during which the Mayor and City Clerk described NPDES, it's purpose and intent, it's requirements and presented the draft report. Page 6 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCR1PpON SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 1-03-R B. Name or Type of BMP: City Website and Annual Community Notice C. BMP Description: The City will publish a website that will communicate to City residents, along with the publication of the Annual Community Notice. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Public Education & Outreach 1. Interview website designer, determine budget requirements to meet minimum standards set, and establish designer based time line for website implementation. 2. Identify editor/producer for Annual Community Notice, determine budget requirements to meet minimum standards set, and establish editor/producer based time line for implementation. E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Number of hits on website once implemented. 2. Completed delivery of Annual Community Notice and attendance at Annual Public Meeting. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. The website developer will control the time line for implementation. 2. Development/design, production and delivery of the Annual Community Notice should be complete by 01 June 2004. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In 2003, Richard Bo sak volunteered and was selected as editor/publisher ofthe Community Newsletter which includes the Annual Community Notice. Materials on NPDES will be made available to him on or before 15 March 2004 to insure June, 2004 delivery of the Annual Community Notice. 2. W ebsite designer selection has begun and should be complete by 01 June 2004 for development and implementation as budgets allow. Page 7 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 S WPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 1-04-R B. Name or Type of BMP: WMO Education Programs C. BMP Description: The City will work with RWMWD andVLAWMO to distribute general information on non -point source pollution, impacts and needs for reduction. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Public Education & Outreacb 1. Identify materials available from WMO's, obtain as budget allows and distribute. E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Number of material or concept distributions annually. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. This program was begun in Summer, 2003 and will be ongoing as materials are made available, updated or otherwise identified as meaningful. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In 2003, public education information was obtained from RWMWD and distributed to the City Council and Planning Commission. Additional copies will be included in the Annual Community Notice. Page 8 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 2-01-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Public Education and Outreach C. BMP Description: The City will utilize public education and outreach programs consisting of the activities listed in BMP's 1-02-R and 2-01-R. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Public Involvement and Participation E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Track the number of inquiries/contacts, website hits, and public meetings and record the comments of all for consideration as part of the SWPPP. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. This program will begin in February, 2004 and be ongoing. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In January, 2004 a public hearing regarding a proposed development was attended by more than 15 people with comments and concerns including erosion and sediment control recorded. 2. In February, 2004 a public meeting was held to identify the City's SWPPP, to respond to questions from the public and receive public comment from those present regarding the SWPPP for possible inclusion in the SWPPP. Comments from those present are currently under review. Page 9 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 3-01-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Public Education and Outreach C. BMP Description: Encourage the public to report suspected illicit discharge utilizing the City's website and Annual Community Notice on an ongoing basis. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Track the number of inquiries/contacts, webs ite hits, and public meetings and record the comments of all for consideration as part of the SWPPP. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. This program will begin in February, 2004 and be ongoing. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In February, 2004 a public meeting was held to identify the City's SWPPP, to respond to questions from the public and receive public comment from those present regarding the SWPPP for possible inclusion in the SWPPP. Comments from those present are currently under review. Page 10 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES -MS4 5WPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 3-02-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Regulatory program to prohibit non -storm water discharges into the MS4 C. BMP Description: Identify and begin review of all City ordinances to determine if they meet the requirements of the NPDES permit program and make revisions as necessary. Determine if current state, county or WM O regulatory mechanisms are sufficient to cover this BMP. Identify additional local controls that may be necessary to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit program and begin development as necessary. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine successor benefits of this BMP: 1. Complete review of City, state, county and W MO ordinances and regulatory mechanisms to determine needs for change to and addition of regulatory controls for implementation by 10 March 2006. 2. If needed: a. Complete background and draft ordinance structure by 10 March 2006; and b. Begin formal ordinance development process by 10 March 2006; and c. Complete process and secure City Council approval by 10 March 2008. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. See E. 2. a. thru c. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In February, 2004 Mayor Emeott and City Clerk Magnuson enrolled in seminars including an Ordinance Development Seminar scheduled in March. 2004. 2. In February, 2004 the City Engineer has begun reviewing City ordinances and regulatory mechanisms to begin determination of whether established ordinances meet the requirements of the NPD ES permit program. �J Page 11 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET- Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 3-03-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Storm System Outfall and BMP Map C. BMP Description: Preparation of a map that indicates the location of appropriate storm sewer system components and receiving water bodies. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Collect and add to the map (as needed) existing storm sewer and other structural BMP's by 10 March 2004. 2. Verify accuracy of draft map and standardize map nomenclature by 10 March 2004. 3. Update map annually to include new information collected as part ofthe inspection program described in BMP 6-03-R. 4. Complete MS4 map by 10 March 2008. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Year 1: identify all ponds, streams, lakes and wetlands, structural pollution control devices (grit chambers, separators, etc.), pipes and conveyances 24 inches in diameter and over, all outfalls to defined waters, discharge points leaving the MS4 and structures that discharge directly to ground water. 2. Year 1 to 5: coordinate mapping updates with streets and storm system maintenance staff and with engineering/planning staff involved in review and implementation of new practices. 3. Year 5: completed MS4 Map incorporated into final annual report due on 10 March 2008. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In 2003 all structural pollution control devices (grit chambers, separators, etc.), pipes and conveyances 24 inches in diameter and over, all outfalls to defined waters, discharge points leaving the MS4 and structures that discharge directly to groundwater were identified to the City Engineer for incorporation with data already in place regarding identification of all ponds, streams, lakes and wetlands. A new preliminary map is currently in production for review on or before 10 March 2004. Page 12 CITY OF GEM LAKE Claims For Payment Period Ending 02/20/04 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Roland Birkebak, Council Richard Bosak, Council Patrick Igo, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Signatures Approving Claims For Payment Date Of Approval DATE / / DATE DATE /z3/ QT DATE DATE DATE IF z DATE GENERAL SEWER CLAIM# PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM S AMOUNT FUND I l U SP SP SP SP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP _GP GP GP .GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP _G I' GP GP _GP GI) _GP GP M33 ?033 ; ?033 23-Feb _ 23-Feb J 23-Feb METROPOLITAN COUNCIL I MetrWIh n Council TOTAL CLAIM 51.4' Current User Charges: Adjustnma to Jan/Feb 2004 Metrop4ho Council Current User CharW, March 2004 862.0' >-034 23-Feb Jiffi Print I Printing Sewer Billing Return Envelopes _ _ Dishonesty Bond: Mayor & City Clerk _ 79.50 100.001 1,101.41 . 7951 5358 5359 5359 5359 5360 5360 21-Jan r 23-Feb 23-Feb 23-Feb 21-Jan 21-Jan Paulet Slater 100.00 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE TOTAL CLAIM City of White Bear Lake Fire & Paramedic: February 2004 853.83 City of White Bear Lake Fire Marshall & Inspections: February 2004 247.58 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER _ TOTAL CLAIM 4.10 Minnesota State Treasurer - 4th Qtr 2003: Building Permits 27.60 5360 5360 21-Jan_ 21-Jan_ Minnesota State Treasurer Minnesota State Treasurer 4th Qtr 2003: Plumbing Permits _ 0.50 0.50 - 4th Qtr 2003: Electrical Permits 5360 21-Jan Minnesota State Treasurer 4th Qtr 2003: Mechanical Permits 0.50 (25,00 281.30 5360 6361 5362 5363 21-Jan 23-Feb 23-Feb 23-Feb Minnesota State Treasurer E-Z Recycling, Inc. Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organizati Smith*Schafer & Associates, Ltd. 4th Qtr 2003: Permit Retention - Curbside Recycling: February 2004 281.30 Membership Dues: 2004 1,647.00 1,647.00 Pre arationOf2003 W-3/W-2Forms&l099Forms 250.00 250.00 5364 23-Feb MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC TOTAL CLAIM 164.00 5364 23-Feb Meslow & Olson, PLLC Letter to Deputy Re: Waller 24.00 5364 5365 23-Feb 23-Feb Meslow & Olson, PLLC PRESS PUBLICATIONS Jury Trial Re: Foshay 140.00 TOTAL CLAIM 297.50 5365 23-Feb Press Publications Le Trans#:286310: Change ofMcetinZ Notice 83.30 536 L 23-Feb Press Publications Le = Trans4:286751: Public Notice 2004-01 119.00 636523-Feb Press Publications Le;Trans#:287192: Notice of Public Hearing 59.50 6365 i 23-Feb Press Publications Leg Trans#:287193: Notice of Public Meeting 35.70 63661 23-Feb Xcel Energy Street Lighting: January 2004 60.04 60.04 6367 23-Feb LEONARD,O'BRIEN,SPENCER,GALE&SAYM TOTAL CLAIM 815.00 6367 23-Feb Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre MunMtrs ZoningRcVH-,Gardn&SubdMsionAppro� 75.00 636,71 23-Feb_ Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre XcelEnergyTransformerHaulRoute 63681 2_3-Feb_ Gopher State One -Cal l 3 Regular Tickets ® S I. I Shieket (_+voieeonly.@S2 6369 23-Feb Ramsey County IAw Enforcement: February 2004 v _ _ 6370 23-Feb SEH, INC. TOTAL CLAIM 6370 2F-Feb SEH, Inc. City Enjkneeriq Services: Mise Extra Service 6370 23-Feb_ SEH, Inc. NPDES Related Services 6371 23-_Feb MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM 6371 23-Feb Magnuson & Associates. LLC Tclephone&FaesimileSorvicC.Jan/Feb-2004 6371 23-Feb Magnuson &Associates, LLC OfficeSupplies; pyinpkftkege_JatJFCb-2004 6371 23-Feb I Ma#.n on & Associates. LLC Mileage:Jan/Feb-2004( 106 ® $0.375) 6371 23-Feb_ Magnuson & Associates. LLC Intc_rnetAccess 50%):FcWMar-2003 &. Jan/Feb-2 -_ 6371 23-Feb Magnuson & Associates. LLC 1 Lai ToegoTputer-50%MonihlyPaymeM 6371 23-Feb _� Magnuson & Associates. LLC AssistantClerk,Jan/Feb-2004: 12.00 hours 6371 23--Feb _ _� Magnuson & Associates. LLC ZoningAdmin, Jan/Feb-2004: 3.75 hours 6371 23-Feb Magnuson & Associates. LLC • Zc ningAdminBillable,JaWFeb-2004:24.50 hours 6371 23-Feb_ Magnuson & Associates. LLC GeneralAdmin,Jan/Feb-2004: 28.75 hours 6371 23-Feb I Magnuson & Associates. LLC GeneralA_dminBillable, Jan/Feb-2004: 6.25 hours 6371 23__Feb_ Magnuson & Associates. LLC SewerAdmin, Jan/Feb-2004: 0.00 hours 6371 23-Feb Magnuson & Associates. LLC _ ChiefEicctionludgo:Jan/Feb-2004: 0.25 hours 6371 23-Feb Magnuson & Associates. LLC CodeEnforcement:Jan/Feb-2004: 1.25 hours 740.00 10.20 10.20 5,045.19 5,045.19 471.00 349.00 - 122.00 5,914.60 - 177.92 174.28 39.75 23.90 50.00 600.00 281.25 1,937.50 2,156.25 468.75 0.00 11.25 93.75 Run Date & Time: 02/21/2004 at 05:31:47 PM File: 04claim02.123 CITY OF GEM LAKE Claims For Payment Period Ending 02/20/04 Paul Emeott, Mayor ~ Chuck Watson, Council Roland Birkebak, Council Richard Bosak, Council Patrick Igo, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk DATE GP 6372 23-Feb PAUL R. EMEOTT GP 6372 23-Feb_ Paul R. Emeott GP 6372 23-Feb Paul R. Emeott GP 6372 23-Feb I Paul R Emectt GP 6372 23-Feb Paul R. Emeott GP 6372 23-Feb Paul R. Emeott ALL 02/23/2004 , FEBRUARY SUMMARY 8.33% Of Budget Monthly ALL 02/23/2004 YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY 16.67% Of Year Completed ALL i 02/23/2004 VERSUS ANNUAL BUDGET 16.67% Of Year Completed Signatures Approving Claims For Payment Date Of Approval DATE / / T7 7 DATE OZ �1 _. � DATE / DATE Z /G DATE DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM ZONING:McNulty-26.00 hours @ $75_ ZONING:HansenLDB-1.00 hour @ $85 _ NPDES: Seminars-8.00 hours @ $75 _ Mileage: 2 Seminars-14 miles * $0.375 Intergovernmental Meetings: 3 @ $20 TOTAL FOR FEBRUARY %Annual Budget TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE % Annual Budget Annual Budget $Under/($Over) Annual Budget %Under/ -%Over GENERAL SEWER $ AMOUNT FUND FUND 2,695.50 1,95000 _75.00 600.00 10.50 60.00 $18,856.84 $993.04 $19,849.88 7.12% 8.25% 1.99% $41,274.29 $39,444.92 $1,829.37 14.81% 17.25% 3.66% $5,167.38 ($1,328.25 $6,495.63 1.85% -0.58% 13.00% Run Date & Time: 02/21/2004 at 05:31:47 PM File: 04claim02.123 GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT GEM County Gem Lake, MN East GENERAL FUND CHECKING C H K I N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 01-Jan-04 START 71624.65 79047.60 70283.60 71,714.65 BANK BALANCE 78,766.30 78,766.30 78,687.10 73,595.57 69 756.69 57 67,281.39 67,281.39 67,221.11 6,17 66,073..50 65,511.00 LAKE Road "E" 55I10-5231 -20704.18 13281.23 -7422.95 DEBIT 90.00 8I3078,676.30 (79 20 (5,091.53 3,838.88 (413.12 (2,067-18 (60.28 (46 20 (1,101.41 (562 50 CREDIT 71NCE BALANCE 78,676.30 78,597. l0 73,505.57 69,666.69 67.191.39 67,191.39 67,131.11 65,8 6,983..50 65 421.00 N E TRAN # CHECKSTO DEPOSITS FROM -Washington Metro Watershed E-Z Recycling Inc. Meslow & Olson, PLLC RAMSEY COUNTY SEH, INC. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ALLEN ZEPPER Xcel Energy Press Publications CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE LCOD84 O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre PAYMENT FOR r & Cler naWErosion&ScdimentCttlCo Curbside Rocycliag January 2004 Pro-TrWForChadMattin;Coptes TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM 4TH QM 2003 WITHHOLDING TOTAL CLAIM Street Lighting December 2003 LegTmns#284686: TOTAL CLAIM MunMters:Ord79;S lUsePmuDemo;Ord43 -04 F23-Jan-04 -04 29-Jan-04 P6340 GP6341 P6342 P6343 23-Jan-04 G%344 P6345 26-Jan-04 22-Jan-04 23-Jan-04 P6346 %347 23-Jan-04 26-Jan-04 %348 P6349 22-Jan-04 P6350 1 1 1 1 (300.00 (70.00 47.00 (453.00 65,121.00 65.051.00 65,004.00 64,551.00 65.211.00 65,141.00 65,094.00 64,641.00 28-Jan-04 22-Jan-04 28-Jan-04 P6351 GP6352 P6353 John G. Hoeschler, P.A. Paulet Slater Cindy Shilts Paul R. Emeott Reimbursement for Secretarial & Legal Clerk Se Dishonesty Bond: r & City Clerk Permit Closure for #P2004-01 ZoninRAdminiistraation:4.5hr %"W ;1.5htGen 27-Jan-04 P6354 1 1 1 ] l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (94.00 63.60 (5,733.88 (12.00 (100.00 (4.10 3,520.85 600.00 600.00 2,000.00 21250.00 140.00 40.50 90.50 55.50 40.50 25 25.0 15.50 25.50 25.50 240.00 00.00 300.00 2,500.00 726.00 60.98 64,457.00 64,193.40 61,968.37 61,980.37 61,219.37 62,818.37 62,818.37 64,818.37 67,068.37 67.209.37 67,248.87 67,339.37 67,394.87 67,46.37 67 40.37 67,475.97 67,52637 67,551.87 67,791.87 68,259.87 68,259.87 68,341.77 68,441.77 70,941.77 71,667.7771,757.77 71,567.77 71,563.67 71,624.65 64,547.00 64.293.40 549.52 62,070-37 62,058.37 62,309.37 62,908.37 64,909.37 64,908.37 67.158.37 67,29837 67.338.97 67,429.37 67,484.87 67,550.37 67,5.37 67,565.97 67,616 67,64.7 67,881.87 68,349.87 68,349.87 68,431.77 68,531.77 71.757.77 71,657.77 71,653.67 71,714.65 23-Jan-04 %355 League of Minnesota Insurance Trust Jim Manteufel MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC RAMSEY COUNTY Premier Bank Hoffman Comer Oil(Align Business System Cafe Cravings2004 GEM LAKE HILLS COUNTRY LOUNGE, INC. New Generation ui t Rsy Tessier Brite Lite Gephart Electric Dan Marier Standard Electric WAY ELECTRIC Marshall Electric Allied Electrical State of Minnesota White Bear Montessori David Gardner Four Seasons Air S ielist Lounge, Inc. Hillary Farm, LLC White Bear Lions Club Paulet Slater MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER Premier Bank Wotw5co '1/l/04-1/1/05 2003 Electrical Permits #E2003-01-08 (80%) TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL PAYMENT (WIRED) Wire Transfer Fee 2004 Tobacco License Non-Imoxicatin Liquor License TOTAL PAYMENT TOTAL PAYMENT PlumWq Permit #P2004-01 Electrical Permit #E2003-01 Electrical Permit #E2003-02 Electrical Permit #E2003-03 Electrical Permit #E2003-04 Electrical Permit #E2003-05 Electrical Permit #E2003-06 Electrical Permit #E2003-07 Electrical Permit #E2003-08 Traffic Fines: December 2003 2003 Fire on Fee Minor Subdivision Application Fee (2004.01) Mechanical Permit #M2004-0181.90 2004 Charitable Gambli License100.00 Subdivision A lication Fee/25X$100 (2004.02 4th Qtr 2003 Charitable Gambling Dish Bond: Mayor & City Clerk TOTAL PAYMENT Interest Paid This Period 26 Jan-04 %356 22-Jan-04 %357 26-Jan-04 1 26-Jan-04 2 13-Jan-04 1 13-Jan-04 2 13-Jan-04 3 4 13-Jan-04 13-Jan-04 5 13-Jan-04 6 Tan-04 :an-04 13,1an-04 7 8 9 13-Jan-04 10 13-Jan-04 11 13-Jan-04 12 13-Jan-04 13 21-Jan-04 1 21-Jan-04 2 1 Jan-04rP6359 [30-Jan-04 Jan-04 Jan-04 Jan-04 Jan-04 27-Jan-04 30-Jan-04 1 Run Date: 02/09/2004 at 02:17:55 PM E-File: PGFCheck04.123 Page 1 of 1 Premier Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Account Number: Statement Date: Checks/Items Enclosed: ipm MEMBER FDIC Page: 1 6005590 1/30/04 29 86 Your friends at Premier Banks thank you for your loyalty and extend our best wishes for a Happy and Healthy New Year. ?REFERRED ELITE CITY OF GEM LAKE Act # 6005590 GENERAL FUND Beginning Balance 1/01/04 85,788.07 Deposits / Misc Credits 6 13,281.23 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 26 27,354.65 ** Ending Balance 1/31/04 71,714.65 ** Service Charge .00 Interest Paid Thru 1/31/04 60.98 Interest Paid Year To Date 60.98 Average Balance 79,633 Average Collected Balance 79,226 Minimum Balance 67,945 Average Rate / Cycle Days .90612 / 31 Enclosures 29 Kiscellaneous Credits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 1/13 343.50 DEPOSIT 1/13 5,240.00 DEPOSIT 1/21 408.00 DEPOSIT 1/26 3,520.85 WIRE IN 1/30 3,707.90 DEPOSIT 1/30 60.98 INTEREST EARNED Kiscellaneous Debits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 1 �L-,,26 12.00 Wire Transfer Fee SEE REVERSE SInF FOR AnnITIONAI INFORMATION Premier 7:E Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. e� CITY OF GEM LAKE ?aid Checks Date Check No. 1/14 6324 1/02 6332* 1/21 6334* 1/07 6335 1/07 6336 1/05 6339* 1/23 6341* 1/27 6342 1129 6343 G" Daily Balance Summary Date Balance 1/02 85,716.07 1/05 80,772.30 1/07 79,332.30 1/13 84,915.80 1/14 84,731.10 Account Number: Statement Date: M MEMBER FDIC Page: 2 6005590 1/30/04 * indicates skip in check numbers Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount 184.70 1/23 6344 3,838.88 1/22 6352 70.00 72.00 1/26 6345 413.12 1/28 6353 47.00 100.00 1/22 6346 2,062.18 1/27 6354 453.00 1,312.50 1/23 6347 60.28 1/23 6355 94.00 127.50 1/23 6348 46.20 1/26 6356 263.60 4,943.77 1/26 6349 1,101.41 1/22 6357 5,733.88 281.30 1/22 6350 562.50 1/26 6358 100.00 79.20 1/28 6351 300.00 1/27 6360* 4.10 5,091.53 Date Balance Date Balance 1/21 85,039.10 1/27 73,384.30 1/22 76,610.54 1/28 73,037.30 1/23 72,289.88 1/29 67,945.77 1/26 73,920.60 1/30 71,714.65 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIO SEWER FUND CHECKING 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT GEM LAKE County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110.5231 SEWER FUND CHECKING C C H K I N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 04 Jan START 41,873.66 44674.57 BANK BALANCE 41 7.33 4166733 41697.33 41727.33 41757.33 41817.33 41847.33 4187733 41907.33 41937.33 41967.33 41997.33 42027.33 42147.33 42297.33 42477.33 43557.33 43677.33 43707.33 43737.33 43767.33 43797.33 43827.33 44307.33 44547.33 44667.33 44674.57 -836.33 3637.24 4473.57 DEBrl -836.33 CREDIT 630.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 120.00 150.00 180.00 1080.00 120.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 480.00 240.00 120.00 7.24 ANCE BALANCE 41 41667.33 7.33 41697.33 41727.33 41757.33 41817.33 41847.33 41877.33 41907.33 4193733 41967.33 41997.33 42027.33 42147.33 42297.33 42477.33 43557.33 43677.33 43707.33 43737.33 43767.33 43797.33 43827,33 44307.33 44547.33 44667.33 44674.57 TRAN DATE TRAN # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM Metropolitan Council ALLEN DRUMMOND Sandra Kuchenmeister Bill Kalil John Birkeland Flanagan PropertiM LLC Peter Oswald Gertrude Hannah Kou Van& Lorraine Birkeland Tolomeo Ong Knot Skierseth Matt White Bear Floral ARNCO INDUSTRIES, INC. Country Lounge, Inc. Tousley Ford, Inc. Rhino Lining% Inc. Larry Weber David Hanson Trust Acct: Randall Thomas Uoyd Lahore John Hurt Hoffman Comer Oil Hoffman Comer Oil Nelson Marine Premier Bank PAYMENT FOR Current User Charges: F 2004 TOTAL PAYMENT 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential Ah Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial TOTAL PAYMENT 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4th Qtr 20.03 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4th QW 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential Ah Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial Interest Paid This Period 23-Jan-04 13-Jan-04 SP2032 1 21-Jan-04 1 21-Jan-04 2 21-Jan-04 3 21-Jan-04 4 21-Jan-04 5 21-Jan-04 6 21-Jan-04 7 21-Jan-04 21-Jan-04 8 9 21-Jan-04 10 21-Jan-04 11 21-Jan-04 12 21-Jan-04 13 21-Jan-04 14 15 21-Jan-04 21-Jan-04 30-Jan-04 16 1 30-Jan-04 2 3 30-Jan-04 30-Jan-04 30-Jan-04 30-Jan-04 4 5 6 7 8 1 30-Jan-04 ^.Jan p4 an-04 Run Date: 02/09/2004 at 12:45:32 PM E-File: PSFCheck04.123 Page 1 'MInImm Premier Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE SEWER FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Account Number: Statement Date: Checks/Items Enclosed: LENDER MEMBER FDIC Page: 1 6005582 1/30/04 4 86 Your friends at Premier Banks thank you for your loyalty and extend our best wishes for a Happy and Healthy New Year. PREMIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE Act # 6005582 SEWER FUND Beginning Balance 1/01/04 41,873.66 Deposits / Misc Credits - 4 3,637.24 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 1 836.33 ** Ending Balance 1/31/04 44,674.57 ** Service Charge .00 Interest Paid Thru 1/31/04 7.24 Interest Paid Year To Date 7.24 Average Balance 42,794 Average Collected Balance 42,611 Minimum Balance 41,873 Average Rate / Cycle Days .20000 / 31 Enclosures 4 Riscellaneous Credits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 1/13 630.00 DEPOSIT 1/21 2,010.00 DEPOSIT 1/30 990.00 DEPOSIT 1/30 7.24 INTEREST EARNED laid Checks * indicates skip in check numbers Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. 1/23 2032 836.33 Amount CFF RI VCQCC clnc cnn nnniT—�.�._ Premier �- Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE Daily Balance Summary Date Balance Date Balance 1/13 42,503.66 1/23 43,677.33 1/21 44,513.66 IN C lOWllll LENDER MEMBER FDIC Page: 2 Account Number: 6005582 Statement Date: 1/30/04 Date Balance 1/30 44,674.57 .RFF RF\/FRCP CHIC C(--ID Annlrl/IHIAI CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 3-04-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Illicit Discharge and Detection Program C. BMP Description: Explore opportunities to expand existing inspection programs to address illicit connections and illegal dumping detection and elimination. Coordinate these activitieswith a complaint response program (BMP 4- 06-R) and other related activities. Research the benefit and feasibility of a program for completing annual reviews of businesses within the City. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: I. Work with other MS4's (Ramsey County and Mn/DOT) to identify illicit discharges through inspections of businesses within the City, 2. Upon discovery of illicit discharges, work with other MS4's to eliminate same from their systems. 3. Annually track the number of inspections of businesses and other areas for identifying illicit connections. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Year 1: Start program development in conjunction with other MS4 inspection programs. 2. Year 2 to 5: Ongoing program activities. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In 2003, a preliminary inspection of businesses was completed to develop a reporting data base including types of businesses and potential illicit discharges. Page 13 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 3-05-R B. Name or Type of BMP: ISTS Inspection and Certification Program C. BMP Description: Continue implementation of bi-annual inspections (even years) by a State certified inspector of all ISTS in accordance with Ordinance No. 67 and review all inspection reports for follow-up enforcement as needed. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Identify the number of ISTS sites inspected by the State certified inspectors. 2. Identify the number of failed ISTS systems corrected. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Year 1: Complete measurable goal data in November -December, 2004 for inclusion in annual report. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. A data base has been established in usable format to identify all ISTS sites in the City. Page 14 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 4-01-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Public Education and Outreach Program C. BMP Description: The City's public education and outreachprogram consists of the activities listed inBMP's 1-02- R and 2-01-R. For Minimum Control Measure #4, the Public Education and Outreach activities are as described in the BMP summary sheets that follows. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Construction Site Storm Water Controls E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Track and record public education and outreach activities related to each BMP 4-02-R to 4-06-R. 2. Maintain City website annually, posting at least one article relating to Minimum Control Measure #4 annually. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Ongoing -see BMP #1-02-R G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See BMP #1-02-R Page 15 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES -MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 4-02-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Construction Erosion and Sediment Control C. BMP Description: The City has existing ordinances (No. 43 and No 58) that address construction site erosion control. The ordinance requires erosion control plans be submitted prior to permitting and/or construction. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Construction Site Storm Water Controls E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Review standard language and requirements for erosion and sediment control plans by 10 March 2004. 2. If revisions are needed to existing ordinances OR if a new ordinance is needed, complete process for and City Council approval by 10 March 2005. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Continue ongoing administration of existing ordinance controls. 2. If needed, commence development of materials and public process by May, 2004. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. Existing erosion and sediment controls are administrated on an ongoing basis for all construction utilizing zoning administrators, building official and building inspectors. Page 16 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 4-03-R B. Name or Type of BMP: WMO Permit Program C. BMP Description: As part of the Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) permit program and the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization (VLAW MO) Watershed Management Plan, the City will continue working with the W MO's to ensure compliance with their requirements and to support inspection and enforcement processes. In addition, the City will continue to promote the BMP's described in the Ramsey County Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Construction Site Storm Water Controls E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Continue to work with WMO's to review compliance with all construction sites greater than 1 acre. 2. Request plan review and inspection results, as applicable, from RWMWD annually for projects in the City. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Currently in place and ongoing. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 2. RWMWD Administrator 651.426.6443 651.704.2089 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. In 2003 the City Council established a policy of referring all plans for development to the appropriate WMO for technical review and comment. Page 17 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 S WPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 4-04-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Development Plan Review Process C. BMP Description: By policy, the City currently has a program to require review all land disturbing activities by a contracted civil engineering company for compliance with the erosion and sediment controls of City ordinances prior to issuing a building permit. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Construction Site Storm Water Controls E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Review all development plans for all sites for which a grading or building permit is required and applied for, including sites less than 1 acre. 2. Count and record the number of sites/projects reviewed. 3. Identify sites where additional storm water BMP's are needed or recommended and make recommendation to owner/developer or permittee. 4. Count and record the number and type of BMP's installed that go beyond the minimum code requirements. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Currently in place and ongoing. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. 3 permitted sites were inspected in 2003 and erosion sediment controls were found to be adequate. Page 18 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET- Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 4-05-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Construction Site Inspections C. BMP Description: The City currently inspects all construction sites by a contracted civil engineer company to review compliance with codes. The City may require a soil erosion cash deposit to guaranty erosion control measures are taken. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Construction Site Storm Water Controls E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Count and record the number of sites inspected annually. 2. Count and record the number of non -compliant sites compared to the total number of sites. 3. Count and record the number of sites where City clean-up is needed. 4. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): Any resident, contractor, City staff, business or state or public agency conducting land disturbance or construction activities in the City should identify with the basic goal of the MS4 program - to reduce sediment and other material discharges to City waters from construction sites and to seek awareness of erosion control practices, site clean-up requirements and how they work to protect water quality when properly installed and maintained. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Currently in place and ongoing. 2. Review database options for more efficient tracking of inspection reports by March, 2004. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. 3 permitted sites were inspected in 2003 and erosion sediment controls at all sites were found to be adequate with no City clean-up required. Page 19 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP r- - BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 4-06-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Complaint Response Program C. BMP Description: The City will develop a more formal complaint response program to address water related complaints. The City will use their existing system of responding to calls to the City Clerk on storm water related concerns. The program phone number and process will be noticed in the Annual Community Notice and on the City's web page. Residents of the City will be able to use the call line to report illicit discharges, report construction site erosion or sedimentation concerns and provide comments on the City's SWPPP. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Construction Site Storm Water Controls E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Post call line on website and in Annual Community Notice. 2. Track the number of storm water related calls annually. 3. Track the number of staff inspections and follow-up actions initiated from calls and complaints received. 4. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): Any resident, contractor, City staff, business or state or public agency conducting land disturbance or construction activities in the City should identify with the basic goal of the MS4 program - to reduce sediment and other material discharges to Citywaters from construction sites and to seekawareness of erosioncontrol practices, site clean-up requirements and how they work to protect water quality when properly installed and maintained. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Currently in place and ongoing. 2. By March, 2004 evaluate the feasibility of linking the complaint system to a storm water database (BMP 6-05-R). G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. No complaints were received in 2003. Page 20 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 S WPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 5-01-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Public Education and Outreach Program C. BMP Description: The City's public education and outreachprogram consists of the activities listed in BMP's 1-02- R and 2-01-R. For Minimum Control Measure #5 the Public Education and Outreach activities as described in the BMP summary sheets that follow. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Post -Construction Storm Water Management E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Track and record public education and outreach activities related to each BMP 5-02-R to 5-05-R. 2. Maintain City website and post at least one article relating to Minimum Control Measure #5. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program timetables. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program. To be implemented. Page 21 CITY OF GEM LAiKE NPDES - MS4 S WPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attallffient 2 ( A. Unique Identification Number: 5-02-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Post Construction Runoff Control Ordinance C. BMP Description: The City's Cooperative Agreement with the Vadnais Lake Water Management Organization (VLA WMO) and the Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District (RW M W D) allows for additional water quality controls to be considered. The City will work with the WMO's to ensure compliance with their Plan requirements and to support the inspection and enforcement process. In addition, the City will continue to promote the BMP's described in the WMO's rules and standards. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Post -Construction Storm Water Management E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Implement existing water quality review program and coordinate measurable goals with BMP 4-04-R (Development Plan Review Process). 2. Report changes in the VLAWMO and RWMWD Plans. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Continue ongoing administration of existing ordinance and controls. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): Any resident, contractor, City staff, business or state or public agency conducting land disturbance or construction activities in the City should identify with the basic goal of the MS4 program - to reduce sediment and other material discharges to City waters from construction sites and to seek awareness of erosion control practices, site clean-up requirements and how they work to protect water quality when properly installed and maintained. `- G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program. To be implemented. �- Page 22 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 5-03-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Private BMP Maintenance Plan Program C. BMP Description: The City will continue a program that requires maintaining private Best Management Practices within the MS4. The City's maintenance requirements are addressed in BMP 6-04-R. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Post -Construction Storm Water Management E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Identification of privately owned BMP's in the City that have and do not have maintenance agreements by March, 2007. 2. Track the number of contacts to site owners to initiate repair or maintenance of the BMP as necessary (annually). Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Continue ongoing tracking and recording of condition of each BMP inspected. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): Any resident or business that have an interest in storm water management practices. b. Increased awareness: Publish article(s) in newsletter and City website that address BMP maintenance and suggestionsto residents and businesses on BMP's that would minimize the need for maintenance in the future. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program to be implemented. Distributed ISTS Management bulletin to all ISTS operators in 2002. Page 23 NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 5-04-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Alternative Treatment Systems C. BMP Description: The City encourages alternative treatment systems in the development and redevelopment project review process and will work with the WMO's to identify feasible options on a case -by -case basis. Options such as surmountable curb with grassed swales; rainwater gardens; bioretention areas and other BMP's willbe considered and encouraged. These practices are often very effective and an innovative way of handling storm water runoff. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Post -Construction Storm Water Management E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Count the number and type of alternative BMP's constructed annually (e.g. rainwater gardens, infiltration basins, bioretention areas, surmountable curbs, etc.) 2. Establish tracking process and database for City -installed and private alternative practices by March, 2005 (see BMP 6-05-R). F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Annually complete ongoing maintenance and updates of the City website and Annual Community Notice. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All residents, businesses, contractors and developers. b. Increased awareness: Publish article(s) in newsletter and City website that address what LID and alternative systems may include and bow to construct and maintain them. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program to be implemented. Page 24 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 5-05-R B. Name or Type of BMP: WMO Permit Program C. BMP Description: Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District (RW MW D) requires permits for any development or redevelopment within it's jurisdiction. The permit requirements address such issues as water quantity, water quality, and sediment and erosion control. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Post -Construction Storm Water Management E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Request copy of and number of permits granted by WMO within the City. 2. Request number of sites inspected by WMO and copies of inspection reports. 3. Request number of sites in compliance with WMO rules and standards. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Continue ongoing program. 2. Request annual information in January. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All City staff, residents, businesses, contractors and developers. b. Increased awareness: Any person who is part of a development or redevelopment will be aware of what they need to do to protect water resources and why. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 2. RW MW D Administrator 651.426.6443 651.704.2089 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program to be implemented. No projects in 2003. Page 25 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP -7771 BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 6-01-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Public Education and Outreach Program C. BMP Description: The City's public education and outreach program consists ofthe activities listed in BMP's 1-02- R and 2-01-R. For Minimum Control Measure 116 the Public Education and Outreach activities as described in the BMP summary sheets that follow. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Track and record education and outreach activities related to each BMP 6-02-R and 6-06-R. 2. Maintain City website annually and post at least one article relating to Minimum Control Measure #6. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Annual website maintenance. 2. Continue Community Annual Notice. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All City staff, residents, businesses, contractors and developers. b. Increased awareness: Make known the importance of storm water issues and how people can make an impact on a larger scale. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program to be implemented. Page 26 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 6-02-R B. Name or Type of BMP: City Staff Training and Information Program C. BMP Description: The City will require it's maintenance contractors to be trained in proper pollution prevention and good housekeeping procedures for storm water management. The City will also provide information for new contractors as needed. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Continue current contractor program and explore opportunities to coordinate with the WMO's. 2. Require contractors to be aware of the information and responsibilities in the City's SWPPP. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Conduct ongoing information activities. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All City staff, residents, businesses, contractors and developers. b. Increased awareness: Make known the importance of storm water issues and how people can make an impact on a larger scale. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. See Public Education and Outreach Program to be implemented. Page 27 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 6-03-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Structural BMP and Outfall Inspection Program C. BMP Description: The City operates a program of cleaning a very limited number of structural BMP's including storm water ponds, skimmers and system outfalls. City staff or contractors inspect system components to look for sediment and debris build-up and proper functioning of the system. The City will continue this program and look for opportunities to improve tracking of inspection results and incorporate the required illicit discharge detection component into the program. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Inspect 100% of the pollution control devices such as traps, manholes, grit chambers, sumps, floatable skimmers, separators and other small settling or filtering devices each year. 2. Inspect at least 20% of system outfalls, sediment basins and ponds each year. 3. Record and track follow-up actions needed, assign a priority level and a timeline for addressing the problem. 4. Record inspection date, weather conditions and results for each component inspected. 5. Record and track the dates of completing major maintenance activities. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Reevaluate inspection schedule following annual reporting results in March, 2005. 2. Reevaluate the inspection intervals and increase frequency ifcleaning or maintenance were notneeded in Year 1 or Year 2. 3. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All City staff, residents, businesses and contractors involved in storm water and water resource inspection and maintenance activities. b. Increased awareness: Make known the importance of an inspection program as critical to the storm water system maintenance program (BMP 6-04-R). G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. 100% of the City's pollution control devices and outfalls were inspected in 2003. \- Page 28 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP B AP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 6-04-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Storm System Maintenance Program C. BMP Description: In the first year conduct an inventory of structural runoff controls owned by the City. In the second year the City will evaluate development of a GIS (or other database) to integrate the location of these controls with schedules for regular inspection and maintenance. The City will coordinate these activities with the inspection program described in BMP 6-03-R. The program will result in timely maintenance of the City's storm system components. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Inspect and maintain system components according to the schedule specified (and as maybe revised) in BMP 6-03-R. 2. Annually track the number of system components maintained and the general condition of the BMP. 3. Estimate the volume or weight of material removed from the BMP annually. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Reevaluate maintenance schedule following annual reporting results in March, 2005. 2. Reevaluate the maintenance intervals and increase frequency if both Year 1 and Year 2 warranted cleaning or maintenance. Reduce frequency if cleaning or maintenance were not needed in Year 1 or Year 2. 3. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All City staff or contractors involved in storm water and water resource inspection and maintenance activities. b. Increased awareness: Make known the importance of the inspection program which is critical to the maintenance program. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. No cleaning or maintenance were required in 2003. Page 29 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 6-05-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Development of Storm System Database C. BMP Description: As described in BMP 3-03-R, the City will be creating an outfall and BMP map that will include information on a range of BMP's (ponds, infiltration areas, etc.) located in the City. The City will review database options and intends to have a fully functional system by the end of the first permit term. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Review database options including off -the -shelf products and the possibility of creating a system in- house by March, 2004. 2. Select preferred approach and identify timeline and responsibilities for completion by March, 2005. 3. Complete initial version of storm sewer system database by March, 2008. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. As described in measurable goals. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All City staff involved in storm water and water resource inspection and maintenance activities. b. Increased awareness: Make known the importance of the database for the inspection and maintenance program and annual reporting of the City's annual SW PPP activities. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. Identification of information for database is nearly complete for developing an in-house system. Page 30 CITY OF GEM LAKE NPDES - MS4 SWPPP BMP DESCRIPTION SHEET - Attachment 2 A. Unique Identification Number: 6-06-R B. Name or Type of BMP: Street Sweeping Program C. BMP Description: The City will continue to contract street sweeping for vehicle safety, pedestrian safety and water quality and environmental reasons. Street sweeping will be done as weather permits in the spring and fall. D. Minimum Control Measure addressed: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP: 1. Sweep at least once in the spring of each year. 2. Sweep once in the fall as weather permits. 3. Count and record the approximate number of miles swept annually. 4. Count and record the dates of sweeping, man-hours and general areas swept. 5. Estimate the amount (volume or weight) of debris collected. F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP: 1. Continue ongoing annual street sweeping program. 2. Coordinate database -tracking system with BMP 6-05-R. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM/PUBLIC OUTREACH COMPONENT a. Audience(s): All City residents and business groups. b. Increased awareness: The City will post street sweeping information on the City website and in the Annual Community Notice. G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk 651.426.6443 H. Summary of measurable goal attainment: 1. Streets swept spring, 2003. Page 31