The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2004 03-15 CC PACKET-CITY OF GEM LAKE Monday CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 15 March 2004 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Emeott at l U/O p.m. TT10 D /lT T MAYOR, 2002 "CI'IV COUNCIL, 2002 CITY COUNCIL, 2002 CITY COUNCIL, 2004 CITY COUNCIL, 2004 Paul Emeott L,_d Chuck Watson Ii' Rick Bosak Pat Igo Rrollie Birkebak CITY CLERK / TREASURER CITY ATTORNEY CITY PROSECUTOR SR. BUILDING OFFICIAL Fritz Magnuson (/ Sarah Cobian Tom Newcome III Doug Meslow Allen Zepper OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE (Attach List) L n r•(n f r APPROVAL OF MINUTES & AGENDA FOR _ �Q A) City Council Minutes for 23 February 2004 B) McNulty Public Hearing Minutes for 23 February 2004 C) NPDES Annual Meeting Minutes for 23 Febrry 2004 1 ,' D) City Council Agenda for 15 March 2004 V`fJf ,' r C(� GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS 1 CODE ENFORCEMENT �� A r�u=Or�r�'" r A) Violations Pending & Abated 1) Summit Mini Storage - Application for Interim Use Permit Received From Nelson j� 2) Launderville 3) Scruggs ;/ooO" 4) Wallin - abated effective inspection on 12 March 2004. 40 -00 5) Leuthard - due 31 March 2004 L./'r PUBLIC SAFETY A) Confirm receipt of Email with Sheriff's Contract City Minu Suburban Crime Watch Reports B) Advise Suburban Crime Watch Reports on Ramsey County Website by date. C) 800 imhz Communications Users Group report PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES A) Fliahwav 61/County E Reconstruction - Meeting in April to discussj[ OLD BUSINESS " DEVELOPMENT .{j A) Hilla F"arms Update r� ( /- ,! ,/ J{- 01.,bderch 2004 Minutes of Planning Commission c J ' 21,46 April 2004 Public Hearing on Plans B D and G �/• W BUSINESS V 1 1 LMC - Taxpayer Bill Of Rights Resolution EASURER'S REPORT 3rf S - CURRENT TREASURER'S REPORT & ACCOUNTS PAYABI,ES BUSINESS T OTHER FINANCIAL �0 �/� A Charitable GamblingDistribution - $2,189`80 (St. Ma 's Schoo , illow Lane, Friends of Parks &Trails) - UNSCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS L PRESENTATIONS FROM FLOOR (3 Minute Limit) FUTURE MEETINGS & ADJOURNMENT FUTURE MEETINGS A) CITY COUNCIL 1) SPECIAL MEETING: A Special Meeting of the City Council shall be scheduled for / / , and shall be duly published in the next edition of the White Bear Press Legal Section. The purpose of the meetin will be to 2) The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held at 7:00 p.m(on 19 Apri12004. /�p�r 3) The next meeting is rescheduled to / / due to ed published in the appropriate eion of the White Bear )?ress Legal Section. ADJOURNMENT: Motion By .-' �' Second By / d S Unanimous Vote & Emeott Approval at p.m. r:�p' 0��' j - _15, // j -9-0 r�' i (per '/ O .1 /�j� . ••-�-_. J%//�� CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH, 2004 The March, 2004 meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 15 March 2004, at 7:06 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Council Members Watson, Birkebak and Bosak, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were Mr. Lindner and Bryan Hansen. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, the following actions were taken: 1) unanimous approval ofthe City Council Meeting Minutes for 23 February 2004 as presented on motion by Bosak, second by Watson; and, 2) unanimous approval of the City Council Public Hearing Extension regarding McNulty development of Hi lary Farms on motion by Birkebak, second by Bosak; unanimous approval of the minutes of the Annual NPDES Meeting on motion by Birkebak, second by Bosak; unanimous approval of the City Council Meeting Agenda as amended for 15 March 2004 on motion by Birkebak, second by Bosak. Magnuson then presented General Announcements. Magnuson then reported on code enforcement indicating: 1) Nelson Marine has applied for an Interim Use Permit to operate an Open Storage Lot on Bryan Hansen's Summit Mini -Storage property which, if granted, will abate the zoning violation; 2) Wallin has abated his junk vehicle violation; 3) no word from Scruggs or Launderville; 4) Noni Valecenti advises they continue to work for the 01 April 2004 deadline. The minutes of the Sheriff's Contract Cities minutes and suburban crime watch reports were sent electronically to all members and all report having received same. Magnuson noted Suburban Crime Watch Reports are now being posted on Ramsey County's website. The report of the 800 mhz radio users group was discussed with no action taken. Magnuson advised that a meeting would most likely be held in April to commence work on the County E / Highway 61 reconstruction project. Magnuson reported that work on the Hillary Farm development continues and McNulty has now requested a public hearing on all three plans. The public hearing has ben set for 06 April 2004. The minutes of the 05 March 2004 planning commission meeting were received by all present. Emeott asked that a public hearing before the City Council be published to receive public comment on the Adult Use Ordinance pending approval by the City Attorney. Magnuson presented LMC information on the Tax Payer Bill Of Rights issue being presented to the legislature and LMC's request for a City Council resolution in opposition to same. The Council agreed to table the measure to April and if no further issues are raised to simply take no action. Mayor Emeott asked that a copy of the current electronic property records be sent to all Council members. Magnuson reported that Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane both have severe winter damage and should probably be considered for repaving. Council asked the Clerk to have the City Engineer update his recommendations for repaving and secure cost estimates from SEH and Schifsky. It was suggested that a public hearing on the matter be scheduled for April to insure work could be completed in the current year. Mr. Lindner reported that the history project is complete and awaiting Mr. Bosak's presentation format for publication. Motion by Bosak, second by Watson to approve Accounts Payable for February/March as prepared by Magnuson and totaling $17,261.42 was unanimously approved. Motion by Bosak, second by Watson to accept the February Treasurer's Report as prepared by Cobian and indicating a balance in the General Fund of $62,914.76 and in the Sewer Fund of $46,092.82 was unanimously approved. Magnuson then presented requests for funding from the $2,189.00 voluntary contribution from the White Bear Lake Lions Club to the City from Charitable Gambling proceeds. Motion by Bosak, second by Watson to approve the following distribution: Friends of Parks & Trails in St. Paul and Ramsey County $ 200.00 St. Mary's School Library Technology Improvements (With City Attorney Approval) $ 789.00 (Without City Attorney Approval) $ 0.00 Willow Lane School Literacy Program (With St. Mary's Donation above approved) $ 1,200.00 (Without St. Mary's Donation above approved) $ 1,989.00 TOTAL APPROVED DISBURSEMENT $ 2,189.00 Motion by Bosak, second by Watson to transfer $11,000 from Parks & Playgrounds Investment Fund to reimburse the General Fund for payment of a similar amount to Vadnais Heights for Gem Lake's portion of the pedestrian way on the south side of County Road E was unanimously approved. Motion by Watson, second by Birkebak to transfer $8,925 from General Fund Investments to the General Fund as reimbursement for 2003 NPDES expenses was unanimously approved. Motion by Watson, second by Birkebak to transfer $20,000 from the Sewer Fund to Sewer Fund Investments was unanimously approved. There being no further business, motion by Birkebak, second by Bosak to adjourn at 8:04 pm was unanimously approved. AUTHORED: 31 March 2004 APPROVED: 19 April 2004 ATTEST cS�F,a(e� �g- &6 , Frederic C. Magnuson City Clerk J ATTEST: c aaC(A. Foe meott Paul R. Emeott Mayor efile: minutes/2004/165marm2004.wpd RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONTRACT COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE MONTHLY MEETING MARCH 18, 2004 CITY OF SHOREVIEW — COUNCIL CHAMBERS ************8.00 A.M.************ 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Minutes of February 19, 2004 3. Approve Agenda 4. Safe and Sober Recognition for Deputy Tim Entner — Bob O'Brien 5. Report on Overtime, Response Times, etc. 6. Report/Discussion regarding 2003 Contract Reconciliation 7. Arden Hills Police Service Update — Michelle Wolff 8. 800 MHZ Update 9. Other Issues 10. Adj ournment u MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE JURISDICTIONS THAT CONTRACT WITH RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR POLICE SERVICES FEBRUARY 19, 2004 The meeting was called to order at 8:07 a.m. The following members were present: ➢ George Altendorfer, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ➢ Joel Hanson, City of Little Canada ➢ Jim March, City of North Oaks ➢ Jan Reagan, White Bear Township ➢ Mike Salter, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ➢ Terry Schwerm, City of Shoreview ➢ Bill Short, White Bear Township ➢ Gerry Urban, City of Vadnais Heights ➢ Michelle Wolfe, City of Arden Hills APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as submitted. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes of January 22, 2004, were approved as written. ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT — Rick Ruzicka Rick Ruzicka, Animal Control Services, Inc., distributed the 2003 Animal Control Activity Report, which included the proposed rate increases for 2005. He suggested that the Contract Group consider increasing the impound fees, noting that other communities are charging higher rates. He stated that there has been a slight increase in wildlife issues. Mr. Ruzicka asked to be advised when he will need to convert to 800 MHz. WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS — Tim Entner Enforcement Update Deputy Tim Entner reported that Dennis Stoterau is willing to work in weight restriction enforcement again this year if funding is available. There was discussion with regard to incorporating this cost into the budget, instead of trying to determine how it will be funded each year. Altendorfer noted that the $5,000.00 - $6,000.00 additional cost is usually absorbed within the budget. Short suggested adding a category in the Traffic Deputy's budget for J part-time weight restriction enforcement. Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting February 19, 2004 Hanson moved to authorize $5,000.00 for 2004 weight restriction enforcement. Short seconded. Ayes all. Deputy Entner will discuss Mr. Stoterau's interest with regard to extending his service for future years, and report back. Deputy Entner presented information with regard to a new speed cart and portable speed boards. He stated that the newer speed carts are easier to use, can face in any direction, and are priced from $7,500.00 - $8,000.00. Entner also stated that he liked the speed boards because of their portability. He provided information on the "Stalker" speed board, which is priced at $4,000.00. Altendorfer recommended working in the direction of getting a new speed cart and one portable board, for flexibility. He stated he liked the idea of attaching it to a minimally used squad car, as it will provide more visibility and impact. Urban supported the idea and suggested that the portable speed board be rotated between communities, and that our Public Works Departments could install poles that the boards can be attached to. Deputy Entner will ask a sales representative to provide a demonstration at a future meeting. 2005 BUDGET - First Draft Altendorfer distributed the first estimate for the 2005 contract. He reported that the projected salary increases were set at 1.68% and 2%, on March 1, 2005, because the deputies have settled their contract. He stated that the number of deputies in the estimate includes the split cost of the midnight deputy for the Township, Vadnais Heights and North Oaks. Hanson asked why the investigation costs were down. Altendorfer believed that it is because the senior employees have been taken out of the equation. Hanson inquired about estimates for additional help during the "Unweave the Weave Project", noting that collector and local roads will receive more traffic, during the construction period. The Group discussed extending the current traffic deputy hours or adding a second traffic deputy. Short stated that the project will affect all of northern Ramsey County, and he inquired if there were County or State dollars available for additional enforcement. Hanson stated that he has been advised of the need to seek special legislation to fund it, and that Little Canada intends to pursue this action. Urban stated that Vadnais heights also intends to work with their State representatives for legislative funding, however he still feels there is a need to get a plan in place. 2 J Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting February 19, 2004 Salter advised the Group that state troopers are usually only added to a project to protect the workers by slowing down traffic through construction areas. Hanson suggested that the Group discuss adding another traffic deputy at a future meeting. It was noted that the budget will remain on the upcoming agendas for updates 2003 FINE REVENUES Altendorfer distributed a report on fine revenues since 1999. He reported that the share totals have been fairly consistent. He explained that the courts have increased the surcharges and that most of the fees paid go toward court costs. He will provide clarification on how the fines / surcharges are split at the next meeting. SPECIAL EVENT STAFFING Alterdorfer reported that the requests for traffic enforcement for special events (races, parades, bike rides, etc.), have been increasing. He pointed out the financial impact of assigning a paid staff person overtime to coordinate and work during the events. Discussion regarding this matter was continued to next month's meeting. Hanson will call the League of MN Cities, to request a model application. ARDEN HILLS POLICE SERVICE UPDATE Wolfe reported that the Arden Hills City Council had a question and answer session with the New Brighton Police Department and the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department on Tuesday. She stated that public input will be received on Monday night, and that police service will be on the City Council Agenda on March 8t" 800 MHz UPDATE Altendorfer reported that Undersheriff Luey is currently attending a meeting on this subject, and that there are no updates to report. He stated that the County Board has requested a study in terms of a combined communication center or several centers. Schwerm pointed out that none of the Contract Communities want a consolidated Communication Center and he noted concern about who will run the dispatch center. 3 Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting February 19, 2004 It was felt that as a Contract Group, it should be made clear that we do not want to see legislation mandating consolidation. Wolfe noted that her City Council has suggested a resolution against consolidation. Altendorfer reported that the Sheriff's Department is implementing the last stages of the Records Management System that began five years ago. OTHER ITEMS Altendorfer reported that Bob O'Brian, Safe & Sober, has been recognized throughout the State for his efforts in terms of traffic enforcement. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:43 a.m. The next regular meeting will be held on MARCH 18, 2004, at 8:00 A.M., at the CITY OF SHOREVIEW COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Respectfully submitted, Jan Reagan Recording Secretary JAR/ 4 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES - HILLARY FARM SUBDIVISION Memo to: Paul Emeott From: Jack Hoeschler, Chair Re: Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting February 18, 2004 Date: February 19, 2004 The Gem Lake Planning Commission held a special meeting at 7 pm on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at Tousley Ford pursuant to published notice to receive public comments regarding the McNulty proposals for the Bemis Property (Hillary Farm at Gem Lake). All members except Mrs. Robins were present along with Messrs. Emeott and Magnuson as co -zoning administrators. Numerous members of the public were also present along with Mr. McNulty and members of his team. The Chairman opened the meeting by giving a brief description of the nature and status of the process, the way the meeting will be conducted and an introduction of key individuals. He then asked Mr. McNulty to give a brief overview of his primary (25 lots mostly 3 acres except for the estate lot and one 36,000 SF lot on Scheuneman) and alternative (49 units on 33 lots) proposals, which he did. Mr. Emeott then gave a brief report on the VLAWMO review of the project (which urged use of public sanitary sewer instead of septic systems, monumented no -cut areas around wetlands, and avoiding any impact on wetlands by driveways). Various residents then asked questions and/or raised a number of points including the following: • The open space provided in the alternate plan will not be public but rather owned and maintained by the Home Owners Association. After 30 years there is some risk that that use may change. The claimed open space (42.9 acres) seriously overstates the reality. • The so-called open space plan places the houses too close to the golf course and this will likely result in conflicts from errant balls. • Each lot will generate about 10 trips per day (per the developer's engineer) and thus the traffic on Scheuneman Road will increase by about 25%. It was suggested that is possible that the two entries and the additional traffic will actually slow traffic on Scheuneman. J • The developer confirmed that only riparian lots would have access to the Lake. The present irrigation pump from the lake will be removed and the duck pond south of the main house will be filled by the well at the main house. • The so-called open space plan will have 49 homes on 33 lots and most attendees were unhappy with that type of density even though it would have public sewer and leave the southeast quadrant undeveloped. • The prospect or danger of further subdivision of the three acre lots on the primary plan was raised and briefly discussed. • Bryan Hansen spoke strongly in favor of the need for public sewer but said that he thought the developer was capable of a better plan. A straw vote of the public present at the meeting was held to get an indication of whether any of the various proposals had predominant support. It was clear that a vast mgLjority of the public present preferred the standard 3 acre proposal over the more dense alternatives. The chairman announced that the public hearing would be continued to the Council meeting next Monday, February 23, to allow others to express their opinions on this important project. The Planning Commission will meet again on Tuesday, March 3, to begin detailed discussions of the terms of a Developer's Agreement and other requirements for any development. He indicated that there would be more detailed analysis of the implications of the septic system proposal for the 3 acre layout since there was great concern that we not be simply delaying greater problems later. CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING Continued From 18 February 2004 23 February 2004 A Public Hearing initially convened on 18 February 2004 before the Gem Lake Planning Commission and continued to this date by Planning Chairman Hoeschler was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 23 February 2004, at 7:07 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Igo, Watson, Bosak and Birkebak, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were Chair- man Hoeschler and Mr. Lindner of the Planning Commission, Mr. McNulty and his consultants and several members of the community as listed on the attached. Mayor Emeott then made opening comments stating, for the record, that this hearing is a continuation of the hearing originally convened before the Planning Commission to insure all interested members of the Gem Lake community had opportunity to be heard regarding the proposed subdivision of Hillary Farm by McNulty Construction Company. Mayor Emeott stated that Mr. McNulty has been working diligently to present alternative plans for the site for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council. Mayor Emeott then presented the Agenda for the continuation of the public hearing. Motion by Birkebak, Second by Igo to approve the Agenda for the Public Hearing was unanimously approved The Clerk reported that the Notice of Public Hearing was duly published in the 04 February 2004 edition of the White Bear Press and that direct mail notification required for the proceeding had been com- pleted coincidental to the legal notice publication. Mayor Emeott then indicated that while the required hearing for a subdivision was held before the Planning Commission, Bryan Hansen indicated at the January City Council meeting that he felt the City Council and not the Planning Commission should receive public comment. Following receipt of Mr. Hansen's comments, the City Council determined additional time to hear the matter could be made avail- able on this date. The primary purpose of this continuation of the hearing is to receive comments from those who were not heard or could not attend the 18 February 2004 hearing. Mr. McNulty then presented to those present his concept plans identified as Plan "B", Plan "D" and Open Space Plan for discussion noting differences as well as the opportunities and challenges of both plans. Mayor Emeott then recognized Councilor Watson who asked for clarification of intent to sewer each or all plans to which McNulty responded only "D" and Open Space provided for sewer and "B" utilized ISTS. Bill John asked if any record of a 65' easement along the south edge of the golf course had been addressed and was advised that no such easement exists according to title searches ordered by McNulty. Bill John asked if zoning changes would be required for "D" or Open Space and the answer was yes. Bill John indicated he preferred the 3 acre zoning approved in recent years by the City but also supported bring- ing the sewer into the plan. Bill John also has concerns as he only recently replaced his ISTS and would not want additional costs at this time. Gary and Mary Limborg asked if road alignment with Scheuneman Road could be done in such a manner as to avoid direct headlights into homes on the east side of Scheuneman Road to which McNulty responded yes this will be considered and can be accommodated. Discussion of traffic counts at approximately 250 trips per day (10 trips per day for 25 homes) for "B" clarified concerns by Hanson and corrected Hoeschler's notes regarding the hearing on 18 February 2004. Magnuson further noted that changes to Scheuneman Road would be Ramsey County concerns as they have not met Gem Lake's criteria for turn backs which, in turn, would allow for restructuring traffic patterns. Discussion of golf course concerns regarding potential damage to homes was discussed and warrants considerations of set -backs. Bosak discussed sewer versus density and alignment to avoid adverse impact on current residents Hoeschler noted the City Engineer has recommended installation of sewer for all plans due to environ- mental concerns. Emeott noted similar concerns from VLAWMO along with concerns over bituminous •J curbs and buffers at wetlands to avoid fertilizer and other pollutants. Discussion of the possibility of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet followed as both the City Engineer and VLAWMO thought this Page 3 of 4 might be considered depending upon sewer and other considerations. Roger Anderson, McNulty's engineer stated that an EAW would be a waste of time and money and noted our Ordinance provides for the use of ISTS in 3 acre R-I Residential Districts. Mr. McNulty moved that his application be declared complete. that soils are adequate for ISTS and can be done in accordance with City ordinances. Bill John asked why mound systems were shown, stating he believed these were used primarily in areas where soils would not support standard ISTS. Roger Anderson responded that plans for mounds were included as worst case scenarios and that where in ground systems were appropriate they would be em- ployed. John then indicated a preference for 3 acre zoning and sewer. Ken Defiel was recognized and supported John's comments. Magnuson noted verbal comments received by Jule Hannaford, trustee for Jack Hannaford's property. Magnuson noted that only Hanson has submitted written comments regarding traffic discussed earlier. There being no further business, the Public Hearing was adjourned at 8:15 pm. AUTHORED: 02 March 2004 APPROVED: 15 March 2004 ATTEST: *,tebma 6 Aaq4�� Frederic C. Magnuson City Clerk J ATTEST:: �! Aw/R.CiI�iZw& Paul R. Emeott Mayor e-file: hearings\2004\HillaryFarm040223A.wpd Page 4 of 4 Memo to: Mayor Emeott From: Jack Hoeschler Cc: Commission, Council, Clerk, McNulty, Hansen Date: March 5, 2004 Re: March 2, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting The Gem Lake Planning Commission held its regular March meeting on Tuesday, March 2, 2004 at 7 pm at Tousley Ford. All members except Ms. Robins (in California) were present along with Mr. Magnuson acting as co - zoning administrator. We were also joined by Mr. McNulty and his team, Bryan Hansen and representatives of the First Evangelical Free Church. Executive Summary: Regarding the McNulty proposal, no official action was taken and the matter was set over until the April meeting. During the interim it is hoped that further work by all sides will allow a consensus plan to develop for this important property. No one (except possibly the developer) liked the three acre plan without sewer. There was a clear consensus on the Commission that any development plans should have sanitary sewer. A problem arose in the discussion of how much, if any, of a density bonus should be given for a sewered plan and whether such a plan should include townhouses or only single family lots. The Commission was split on this latter point. It is the Chairman's hope that informal discussions with Commission members, Council members, and members of the public during the next 30 days will result in a consensus on this important issue. Reizardina the church proposal, the church representatives asked for consideration and cooperation with respect to easing the 45% open space and Monday to Friday primary operating hours provisions of the LBD zone to allow them to proceed with a formal proposal for a new church on the Hansen property. While individual members of the Commission stated that the 45% open space provision might be eased, there was still a strong consensus that this church was too big for the community in this location. It was suggested that they might explore locating in the retail business area in the SE quadrant of 61 and E where Mr. Hansen also owns land. They were told that they certainly could apply but that the odds of success were poor, at least based on the preliminary information that we currently know. J 1,1 McNulty Proposal for Hillary Farm J Mr. Hoeschler reported that he and Mr. Magnuson had met that morning with Mr. McNulty. This meeting was a follow-on to the earlier recommendation to the Council by the City Engineer that an EAW be required for any unsewered plan. Mr. Hoeschler said that he had given Mr. McNulty a one page answer to Mr. McNulty's question: What Does Gem Lake Want? Based on his discussions with interested parties, Mr. Hoeschler's answer was that any plans should be sewered and density should be about 31 units, lower than Mr. McNulty proposals which showed sanitary sewer. A Brief Summary of Principal Proposals [A review of the principal proposals that are under discussion may be helpful for readers of these notes who do not have the various plans before them: Plan B: 25 lots predominantly 3+ acres each and closest to our ordinance but not approvable as a matter of right because it will require rezoning of one 36,000 SF lot. This plan contemplates individual wells and mound septic systems on each lot. Plan D: 34 single family lots served by sanitary sewer and individual wells; 7 along lake at 3 acres and the rest at one acre apiece with the SE 1 /4 held open. Plan E (not presented by developer but described by Mr. Wippich) with W 1 /2 all 3 acre lots as on Plan B, SE 1 /4 open space, and NE 1 /4 twin homes for a total unit count of about 31 or 32; all lots to be served by sanitary sewer and twin homes to have common water system. Plan G: (presented schematically by developer) showing 42 total units, comprising 7 lots along lake at 3 acres each, 12 lots in the NW 1 /4 at 1 or 2 acres each, 11 twin home lots plus one 36,000SF lot for 23 units in the NE 1 /4 and open space in the SE 1 /4. K One Answer to McNulty Question: What Does Gem Lake Want? Mr. Hoeschler handed out the sheet he had given to Mr. McNulty that morning which stated: In order to assure expedited action and positive recommendation from the 312104 Planning Commission meeting, the following is needed: 1) Plan B [3 acre version] sewered with Lot 8 house and view protection; 2) Plan E [Wippich plan] with WI/2 as on Plan B [ fourteen 3 acre lots], SEI14 open space, and NEI/4 with 16+1 single family lots or 8+1 townhouse lots (total of 16+1 units) for 31 units total in plat. Plan G is Introduced and Discussed Mr. McNulty replied that he had bought the property on the basis of being able to do a 3 acre unsewered plat but he then asked his planner to describe a new variation of the sewered plan (Plan G) which had be developed subsequent to the meeting with Messrs. Hoeschler and Magnuson. Plan G comprised the following: An open space in the SE quadrant, seven 3 acre lots (including the larger estate lot) in the SW quadrant along the lake, twelve 2 and 1 acre single family lots in the NW quadrant, and eleven twin home lots (22 units) plus the one 36,000 SF lot in NE quadrant. A spirited discussion followed in which the following points were made: Mr. Wippich stated that while plan G was denser than what he had wanted to see, it was the best looking plan he has seen to date. He asked why the twins could not be reduced to 8 lots/ 16 units for the overall improvement of the plan. He or another cited the Cloisters as a good example of such a somewhat smaller and nicer twin home development. Mr. Wippich felt that the townhouses respond to a growing part of the market for retirement type homes which we do not now have. He felt that these upper end twins would not detract from surrounding uses. 3 Mr. Becicka reinforced the conclusion that inclusion of sewer is essential, but stated that he did not like the twin homes. He would rather see single family lots throughout. He asked about the twin home demographics. Plan D Reintroduced Mr. McNulty replied that he thought that Plan D, which showed 34 single family lots, would be close to what Mr. Becicka sought. Mr. McNulty stated that he had understood the Mayor to say that perhaps a sewered plan would justify a 10% bonus and that an open space plan would justify another 10% bonus and this 20% cumulative bonus is what Plan D shows. He said that the upper -end twin home market has few children but ranges from young professionals with both working to retired types who want to be able to turn the key and go south for the winter. Mr. Lindner also spoke against Plan G and in favor of Plan D. He liked the open space in the SE quadrant but did not like the twin homes in Plan G. He viewed Plan B [3 acre unsewered] as high maintenance with no real open ,) space. He prefered either Plans D or G to Plan B but felt G is too dense. (It seemed to have all possible residential zoning types within it, he commented.) He read a prepared statement which is attached to the hard copy of this memo. His statement highlighted the language in the Comp Plan that stresses the value of open space. It reminded us that this project represents 12% of Gem Lake's total area and, as such, it is our best chance to give meaning to the vision incorporated in our Comp Plan. He saw both open space and sewer as important features of the optimum plan. He also asked for examples of Mr. McNulty's current twin home product. R Mr. McNulty invited people to visit Cedar Pass on the north side of Cedar Lake Road about 1/2 mile west of Highway 73 (Hopkins Crosstown) in the western suburbs to see what he would be proposing as a typical twin. Mr. Hoeschler spoke in favor of the Amesbury twin home development by Mr. McNulty and urged people to visit these projects. Mr. Magnuson stated that the 60 day clock with respect to this project has now started to run [as of a few days ago?]. He expressed preference for either Plans D or G over the unsewered Plan B. He went on to speak most El favorably for Plan G with the twin homes because it provides more life - cycle housing, something the Met Council pointed out we did not have. A discussion of traffic concerns followed, with Mr. Wippich stating that he preferred more local traffic to through traffic. There was also a discussion about the likelihood that the golf course would continue and what kind of a precedent approval of this plan would have on the density in other areas which might open for development. In the course of this discussion Mr. Wippich said he felt Plan B was out of consideration [because it lacked sewer]. The Chairman stated that he felt that work should continue on Plan G to analyze storm water and other more detailed issues and to see how this might look with predominantly 2 acre lots in the NW 1 /4 and fewer twin home units. Proceedural Maneuvers and Discussion Upon hearing this, Mr. McNulty said that he wanted to withdraw Plan G from consideration and he asked that the Commission vote Plan B up or down and refer the matter on to the City Council. An even more spirited exchange followed. The Chairman stated that he thought it would be unprofessional and poor policy and procedure to send a plan to the Council which no one liked on such an important piece of land. It is the purpose of the Planning Commission to work out the details before proposals go to the Council. While most liked the direction in which Plan G was going, it was something that was less than 12 hours old and clearly needs more work and review before a detailed recommendation can be made. If the developer insists on pursuing Plan B alone, then an EAW may be necessary to consider in greater detail the serious issues raised by the proposed mound septic systems near the lake and wetlands. The Chairman started to make a motion to recommend an EAW but then did not pursue that point because it would likely cost the developer $10,000 and cause a significant delay in the project. He simply indicated that he would not and need not bring the matter to a vote at this time. Mr. McNulty said that he had submitted plans B and D concurrently and he had hoped and expected that they would be reviewed concurrently. The engineering for Plan D has already been done. Mr. Magnuson stated that he 5 _ had told the City Engineer not to do detailed work on Plan D until the various sewered proposals had gelled into a preferred plan and that only Plan B had been given a detailed review. He said that he would ask the City Engineer and other consultants and advisors to review Plan D so that their comments would be ready for the next Planning Commission meeting. J A Concensus Needs to be Developed It is clear that there is a split on the Commission over the issue of the size and number of single family lots away from the lake and the advisability or no of twin homes. It is the hope of the Chairman that the next 30 days will allow time for a concensus to develop within the community on these questions. Plan D needs to be presented to VLAWMO, reviewed in detail by the city engineer and zoning administrators. It is hoped that further planning and analysis of Plan G will continue as well. The matter was therefore set over for consideration at our April 6 meeting. First Evangelical Free Church Discussion Mr. John Gregerson of the First Evangelical Free Church distributed a two page memo asking the City to consider and give favorable indications of interest in helping the church make a proposal to buy the Hansen property west of Tousley Ford by: 1) relaxing the 45% open space requirement in the LBD zone; 2) relaxing or changing the restrictions on weekend operations in that zone; 3) giving favorable consideration to the parking and access requirements of the church; 4) helping with respect to bringing utilities across County Road E to serve this site. In the course of the discussion that followed, several points were made. A number of the members felt that the 45% open space rule might be relaxed but grave concerns were expressed about the size of the church, the amount of parking that would be required and the traffic problems that its operation would present, as well as what might happen to the property if the church outgrew it. The chairman said that he preferred a business park use for that property and felt that the church was just too big for that land. He suggested that the church speak with Mr. Hansen about the southeast IN j quadrant of 61 and E where Mr. Hansen also owns land. This area would present fewer traffic, noise and zoning conflicts. In summary, the church was told that they could certainly apply but that the odds of a favorable outcome from their point of view were poor (at least based upon what limited information we had at this point). We said this in the spirit of not giving them a "slow no". 7 Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 q,,-ill W401wm C* Cleilr CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com fnau/Fmeolf wql ,Oi Mr. Michael Prichard FRIENDS OF THE PARKS & TRAILS 1621 Beechwood Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 Dear Mr. Prichard, ,I nr�wn, Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 dolor azldlz �Ti-as"r 01 April 2004 At it's March meeting, the Gem Lake City Council approved a contribution of $200.00 to the Friends of the Parks & Trails from our General Fund receipts from Charitable Gambling in the City of Gem Lake. We enclose herewith our check in said amount and a copy of the minutes authorizing the payment for your files. On behalf of Mayor Emeott and Councilors Birkebak, Bosak, Watson and Igo we offer best wishes for continued good work in 2004. Regards, CITY OF GEM LAKE F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk encl. cc: Mayor & Council J efi le: 2004Donations\ParkFri ends2004-01.wpd Page 1 of 1 Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 lz �/aynason Chy G/er(r CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com lnao/(imeo%F .�%ayar Principal Mary J. Fritz ST. MARY'S OF THE LAKE SCHOOL 4690 Bald Eagle Avenue White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Dear Principal Fritz, Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444 cyal,20 Col1124 7/-Kwmw 01 April 2004 At it's March meeting, the Gem Lake City Council approved a contribution of $789.00 to the St. Mary's of the Lake School "Library Technology Project" from our General Fund receipts from Charitable Gambling in the City of Gem Lake. We enclose herewith our check in said amount and a copy of the minutes authorizing the payment for your files. On behalf of Mayor Emeott and Councilors Birkebak, Bosak, Watson and Igo we offer best wishes for success with your project and continued good work in 2004. Regards, CITY OF GEM LAKE F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk encl. cc: Mayor & Council •,J efile: 2004Donations\StMarys2004-02.wpd Page 1 of 1 Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 q11-h -C/)1r/11-nu1yon, Ci41 CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com oou1,5""011 Wyo, Principal Jeanne Eisenbarth WILLOW LANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3375 Willow Avenue White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Dear Jeanne, Facsimile: (651) 426 - 6444 c10 alb 6. 112rs %osarvr 01 April 2004 Once again we find ourselves moved to action by both your pleas and the results of your efforts. At it's March meeting, the Gem Lake City Council approved a contribution of $1,200.00 to the Willow Lane Elementary School "Comprehensive Literacy & Social Studies Program" from our General Fund receipts from Charitable Gambling in the City of Gem Lake. We enclose herewith our check in said amount and a copy of the minutes authorizing the payment for your files. We are saddened to learn that you will retire at the end of July although we are confident retirement has been well earned. The results of your efforts are readily apparent in our records and we are confident the Willow Lane community and students have all been beneficiaries of your guidance, enthusiasm and wisdom in their growth. On behalf of Mayor Emeott and Councilors Bosak, Watson, Birkebak and Watson, we wish you all the best in retirement and hope that your days will be filled with new opportunities and the joy of work well done. Please extend our best wishes for continued success with your literacy project and continued good work in 2004. Regards, CITY OF GEM LAKE 3 /� F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk encl. cc: Mayor & Council 1J efile: 2004Don ations\W i llowLane2004-03.wpd Page 1 of 1 Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 03/14/2004 N Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Roland Birkebak, Council Richard Bosak, Council Patrick Igo, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Signatures Approves, (Maim, tur PaN011'nt Date Of Approval DATE DATE ' ' 1 DATE l �� DATE DATE / DATE vti- // J / GENERAL I SEWER DATE CLAIbI# PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM $ AMOUNT FUND FUND SP 2035 15-Mar Me1ro IitanCouncil Cnrges Apri12004 879.93 87993 urret UserChe GP 6373 15-Mar Association for Nonsmokers - Minnesota 2004 North Suburban Tobacco Compliance Project 61.50 _ 61.50 GP 6374 15-Mar International Code Council CC) 2004 Governmental Member Dues 100.00 100.00 GP 6375 15-Mar CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE TOTAL CLAIM 1,101.41 GP 6375 15-Mai City of White Bear Lake Fire & Paramedic: March 2004 853.83 -- -- GP 6375 15-Mar City of Whitc Bear Lake Fire Marshall & Inspections March 2004 247.58 GI' 6376 15-Mar E-Z Recycling, Inc. Curbside Recycling_ March 2004 _ 281.30 281.30 GP 6377 15-Mar Xcel Energy _ Street Li ling. February 2004 60.60 60.60 GP 6378 15-Mar Ramsey County Law Enforcement: March 2004 _ 1,325.19 1,325,19 GP 6379 15-Mar PAUL R. EMEOTT 'TOTAL CLAIM GP 63791 15-Ma_r Paul R. Emeott lstQtr'04Salary (S500.00.31.00ss-7Mnun) - _ 461.75 GP 6379 1 15-Mar Paul R. Emeott 1/2 High Speed Internet Jan/Feb/Mar 60.00 GI' 6372 23-Feb Paul R. Emeott Mileage: 2 Seminars-]4 miles* $0.375 _ _ 10.50 GP 6380 15-Mar Richard Bosak 1st Q1r'04 Salary (S200.00.12.40ss-2.90mm) 184.70 184.70 GP 6381 15-Mar Patrick Igo 1st Qtr'04 Salary (S200.00-12.40ss-2.90mm) _ _184.70 184.70 GP 6382 15-Mar ROLAND BIRKEBAK TOTAL CLAIM _ J 204.70 GP 6382 15-Mar Roland Birkebak ] st Qtr'04 Salary (S200.00-12.40ss-2.90mm_) _ 184.70 GP 6382 15-Mai Roland Birkebak 1stQtr'04SheriffMeetin�(1) _ 20.00 GI' 6383, 15-Mar Chuck Watson 1stQtr'04Salary (5200.00-12.40ss-2.90mm) 184.70 184.70 GP 6384 15-Mar ! Sarah Cobian 1st Qlr'04 Salary (5650.00 40.30ss-9.43mm) _ 600.27 _ 600.27 GP 6385 15-Mar Fritz Magnuson _ _1stQtr'04Salary(S750.00-46.50s_s-]0.8_8_mm) 692.62 692.62 GP 6386 15-Mar LEONARD,OB_RIEN.SPEN_CE_R,GALE&_SAYRE TOTAL CLAIM _ _ 387.50 6386 15-Mar Leonard. O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & MunicMtrs:_RevHansenCorres;AdultUseOrdinance 75.00 6386 15-Mar Leonard, O'Brien. Spencer, Gale & Sayre MpwdIPA_XcelEnc"Tmnsformeri•laulRoute _ 250.00 6386 15-Mar Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer,_ Gale & Sayre HillaryFann:RevAppDet;Rev60DayAetionReq 62.50 6387 15-Mar SEI1.INC. TOTAL CLAIM _ 5,310.40 6387 15-Mar SEH, Inc. CityEngSvc5: MiscExtra Service - 122.00 6387 15-Mar SEH, Inc, i BillSvcs:HillaryFarm Subdivision _ 5,188.40 6388 15-MarMeslow & Olson, PLLC _ Court Trial For Thoa Moua 90.00 90.00 GI' 6389 15-Mar MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC TOTAL CLAIM _ 4,514.65 GP 6389 15-_Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC Telephone&FaesimileSemiee: Feb/Mar-2004 .83 GP 6389 15-_Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC Oft-tc cSuWies Copying&Postage: Feb/Mar-20300 04 00.87 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC MIIea .feb/Mar-2004( 130 ® $0.375) 48.75 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC lnlemetAecess-(5tA :FCWMar-2003 _ 11.95 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC LapTopComputer-5O%MonthlyPayrn-A - _ _ 50.00 GP 638915-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC AssistantClerk,Feb/Mar-2004: ] 1.05 hours _ 552.50 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC ZoningAdmin, Feb/Mar-2004: 4.00 hours 300.00 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC onirtgAdminBillable,Feb/Mar-2004: 6.00 hours 450.00 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC GenentlAdmin, Feb/Mar-2004: 21.25 hours _ _ _ _1.5_93.75 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC GeneralAdminBillable, Feb/Mar-2004: 8.25 hours 618.75 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC SewerAdmin, Feb/Mar-2004: 0.00 hours _ 0.00 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates.. LLC ChiefElection)udgc:Fcb/W--2004: 0.25 hours 11.251 GP 6389 15-Mar Magnuson & Associates. LLC CodeEnforeement:Feb/Mar-2004: 4.00 hours _ 300.00 Run Date & Time: 03/14/2004 at 12:21:45 PM File: 04claim03.123 Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 03/14/2004 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Roland Birkebak, Council Richard Bosak, Council Patrick Igo, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Sienatures Approving Claims For Payment Date Of Approval DATE DATE VS / 64 J c Z- DATE / � ` / 011 DATE 3rs / oy DATE DATE DATE GENERAL SEWER CLAIM# PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM $ AMOUNT FUND FUND GP 6390 15-Mar PAUL R EMEOTT TOTAL CLAIM _ 565.00 GP 6390 15-Mar Paul R Emeott ZoningAdminMIMansenlAPRepmt(3.Ohrs) 225.00 GP 6390 15-Mar Paul R. Emeott 7_om dmin2J23:H8nsenLDBPhOne(I.Ohrs 75.00 GP 6390 15-Mar Paul R. Emeott ZoningAdmin3/4:McNultyReview(3.Ohrs) _ 225.00 GP 6390 j 15_Mar Paul R. Emeott IntergovommentalMeetings:2 ct $20 40.00' ALL 03/15/2004 MARCH SUMMARY TOTAL FOR MARCH $17,261.42 $16,381.49 1 $879.93 f 8.33% Of Budget Monthly _ L % Annual Budget 6.19% 5.88% 0,32% ALL - 03/15/20041 YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE $58,525.21 $55,815.91 $2,709.30 25.00% Of Year Completed % Annual Budget 21.00% 24.41 % 5.42% ALL 03/15/2004 VERSUS ANNUAL BUDGET Annual Budget $Under/($Over) $11,137.301 $1,359.10 $9,778.20 _ _ 25.00% Of Year Cqn. pleted _ Annual udgct%Under/-%OverL 0.59% 19.58% Run Date & Time: 03/14/2004 at 12:21:45 PM File: 04claimO3.123 GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT .'Y OF GEM LAKE , i69 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 TRAN TRAN CHECKS TO DATE 4 DEPOSPPS FROM 26-Feb-04 23-Feb-04 GP6361 GP6362 E-Z Recycling. Inc. Vadnais Lake Area Water Managemen Smith*Schafer & Associates, Ltd. 25-Feb-04 G%363 27-Feb-04 P6364 MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC 27 Feb-04 %365 PRESS PUBLICATIONS 26-Feb-04 %366 Xcel E 26-Feb-04 P6367 LEONARD,OBRIEN,SPENCER,GAI 23-Feb-04 GP6368 Gopher State One -Call 23-Feb-04 GP6369 Ramsey County SEH INC. 26-Feb-04 GP6370 25-Feb-04 GP6371 MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC 25-Feb-04 GP6372 PAUL K EMEOTT 10-Feb-04 10-Feb 04 1 2 Ramsey County Fireside Hearth & Home 20-Feb-04 I State of Minnesota 20-Feb-04 2 Comc,-t 26-Feb-04 1 Daniel Perzichilli 27-Feb-04 1 Premier Bank j GENERAL FUND CHECKING C H K 1 N 2 2 56212.37 01-Jan-04 START 79047.60 61483.71 62,914.76 BANK BALANCE 70,241.94 70y11.94 69991.94 -39446.42 16611.19 -22835.23 PAYMENT FOR Curbside Recycling, Fe 2004 Membership Dues: 2004 Preparation0f2003 W-3/W-2Forms&1099Forms DEBIT (281.30 (1,647.00 (250.00 (164.00 CREDIT 57313.78 BALANCE 71,343.35 69,696.35 69,446.35 TOTAL CLAIM 2 69,282.35 69,927.94 TOTAL CLAIM 2 (297.50 68,984.85 69,530.44 Street Ughft January2004 2 (60.04 68,924.81 69,470.40 TOTAL CLAIM 2 815.00 68,109.81 K655.40 3 Regular Tickets @ $1.15/ticket (+voicmd Law Enforcement: February 2004 .25/ (10 20 (5,045.19 68,099.61 63,054.42 68,655A0 68,655.40 TOTAL CLAIM 2 (471.00 62,593.42 68,184.40 TOTAL CLAIM 2 (5,914.60 56,668.92 62,269.80 TOTAL CLAIM 2 (2,685.00) 53.993.82 59,584.80 2003 SCORE Recycling Grant 2 732.00 54,715.82 60,316.80 Building Permit #B2004-01 Traffic Fines: January 2004 2 2 126.50 174.50 54.34232 55.016.82 60,443.30 60,617.80 2003 Annual Franchse Fee Payment 2 2,118.44 57,135.26 62,736.24 BuildingPermit #B2004-02 2 125.80 57,261.06 62.862.04 Interest Paid This Period 2 52.72 57,313.781 62,914.76 Run Date: 03/10/2004 at 12:35:13 PM E-File: PGFCheck04.123 Page 1 of 1 Premier Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Account Number: Statement Date: Checks/Items Enclosed: COMING SOON Premier Bank will be introducing IMAGE STATEMENTS A better way to manage your checking account. )REFERRED ELITE CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND Beginning Balance 2/01/04 Deposits / Misc Credits 4 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 11 ** Ending Balance 2/29/04 Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 2/29/04 Interest Paid Year To Date Average Balance Average Collected Balance Minimum Balance Average Rate / Cycle Days Enclosures Kiscellaneous Credits LE LEN L r tt MEMBER FDIC Page: 1 6005590 2/27/04 14 86 Act # 6005590 71,714.65 3,329.96 12,129.85 62,914.76 ** .00 52.72 113.70 71,187 70,591 62,862 .94000 / 29 14 Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 2/10 858.50 DEPOSIT 2/20 2,292 94 DEPOSIT 2/26 125.80 DEPOSIT 2/27 52'.72 INTEREST EARNED Paid Checks * indicates skip in check numbers Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount 2/25 6340 90.00 2/27 6364 164.00 2/26 6370* 471.00 2/27 6359* 1,101.41 2/27 6365 297.50 2/25 6371 5,914.60 2,685.00 2/26 6361* 281.30 2/26 6366 60.04 2/25 6372 I-- -'e— llr-„ .,n -)10c 9zZti7 M5_00 Premier IMES Bank Minnesota Ozotied. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE aily Balance Summary Account Number: Statement Date: DER MEMBER FDIC Page: 2 6005590 2/27/04 Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance 2/20 74,866.09 2/26 64,424.95 2/02 71,714.65 2/25 65,926.49 2/27 62,914.76 2/10 72,573.15 j SEWER FUND CHECKING 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURERS REPORT OF GEM LAKE 1369 County Road "E" East Gem lane, MN 55110-5231 SEWER FUND CHECKING C H K I N 04 Jan START 41,873.66 -1829.37 . 6048.53 7877.90 46092.82 46092.82 BANK DEBIT CREDIT BALANCE BALANCE TRAN DATE TRAM # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR 26-Feb-04 SP2033 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TOTAL CLAIM 2 -913.54 43761.03 43761.03 26-Feb-04 SP2034 Jiffi Print Printing Sewer Billing Return Envelopes 2 -79.50 43681.53 43681,53 10-Feb-04 1 Ruth Loh 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 2 30.00 43711.53 43711.53 10-Feb-04 2 Dr. RT. Donahue 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 2 30.00 43741.53 43741.53 10-Feb-04 3 DONALD L. WALDOCH TOTAL PAYMENT 2 720.00 44461.53 44461.53 10-Feb-04 4 Waldoch Custom Center 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 2 120.00 44581.53 44581.53 10-Feb-04 5 Dan's Ailing Auto 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 2 120.00 44701.53 44701.53 10-Feb-04 61 BARNETT CHRYSLER JEEP KIA TOTAL PAYMENT 2 840.00 45541.53 45541.53 10-Feb-04 7 Hoss Permformance 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 2 120.00 45661,531 45661.53 20-Feb-04 1 Tim Draine 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Residential 2 30.00 45691.53 45691.53 20-Feb-04 2 STEVEN SHEPHERD TOTAL PAYMENT 2 64.00 45755.53 45755.53 20-Feb-04 3 AM -PM Automotive 4th Qtr 2003 Sewer Fees/Commercial 2 120.00 45875.53 45875.53 20-Feb-04 4 SUMNIIT FARMS REALTY TOTAL PAYMENT 2 210.00 46085.53 46085.53 27-Feb-04 1 I Premier Bank Interest Paid This Period 2 7.29 46092.82 46092.82 Run Date: 03/10/2004 at 12:42:19 PM E-File: PSFCheck04.123 Page 1 Premier 1-12 Bank Minnesota Ozoized. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE SEWER FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Account Number: Statement Date: Checks/Items Enclosed: COMING SOON Premier Bank will be introducing IMAGE STATEMENTS A better way to manage your checking account. 'REMIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE SEWER FUND Beginning Balance 2/01/04 Deposits / Misc Credits 3 Withdrawals / Misr- Debits 2 ** Ending Balance 2/29/04 Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 2/29/04 Interest Paid Year To Date Average Balance Average Collected Balance Minimum Balance Average Rate / Cycle Days Enclosures Miscellaneous Credits LENDER . R MEMBER FDIC Page: 1 6005582 2/27/04 4 86 Act # 6005582 44,674.57 2,411.29 993.04 46,092.82 ** .00 7.29 14.53 46,049 45,891 44,674 .20000 / 29 4 Date Deposits withdrawals Activity Description 2/10 1,980.00 DEPOSIT 2/20 424.00 DEPOSIT 2/27 7.29 INTEREST EARNED Paid Checks * indicates skip in check numbers Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. ../26 2033 913.54 2/26 2034 79.50 Amount cGF SInF FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIOI Premier n Bank Mitviesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE aily Balance Summary Date Balance Date Balance 2/02 44,674.57 2/20 47,078.57 2/10 46,654.57 2/26 46,085.53 Account Number: Statement Date: Date 2/27 f0(u( LENDER MEMBER FDIC Page: 2 6005582 2/27/04 Balance 46,092.82