The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2004 05-05 CC PACKET�J CITY OF GEM LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Wednesda Aril Meeting Continuation 05 May 2004 CALL TO ORDER RECONVENE CALL TO ORDE :Mayor Emeott at m. CALL OF THE ROLL MAYOR, 2002 CITY COUNCIL, 200 CITY COUNCIL, 2002 CITY COUNCIL, 20 CICOUNCIL, 2004 TY Paul Emeott Chuck Watson Rick Bosak Pat Igo Rrollie Birkebak CITY CLERK TREASURER CITY ATTORNEY CITY PROSECUTOR SR. BUILDING OFFICIAL Fritz Magnuson Sarah Cobian Tom Newcome III Doug Meslow Allen Zepper CITY ENGINEER CITY ENGINEER John Parotti Dave Mitchell I OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE Attach List) OPENING REMARKS Mr. Emeott CTliis meeting is a continuation ofthe April 19`h City Council meeting, said continuation having been granted and approved bed byy unctl action solely for the purpose of providing additional time for review of Developer's Plan B-2 by the Planning Commission, Zoning Administrator, City Engineer and Staff and to file their reports. This is the only item to be discussed at this meeting. Accept Motion to approve City Council Continuation Agenda For 05 May 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS Mfloes hler r.Chairman's Report To Mayor Emeott Regarding Applications For Hillary Farm Subdivision #2002-02, Plan B-2 B) Planning Commissions Recommendation Resolution C) Planning Commission Time lines D Council questions of Planning Commission & Developer STAFF REPORTS Mr. Magnuson A) Status of Plan B-2 Application B) Possible Ramsey County Involvement C) City Attorney's Recommendation To Hire Bond Counsel For Sewer D) Timeline Discussions 1) Next City Council Meeting: Change From May 17`'to May 24'h (or?) 2) Schedule Public Hearing On Plan B-2 As Submitted for May 241h (or?) 3) Schedule Public Hearing on City Sewer Assessment Plan for May 241h (or?) E) Council questions of Staff COUNCIL DISCUSSION Mr. Emeott As this is not a public hearing, time is primarily devoted to Council questions of planning commission, staff, and the developer & his staff. Comments and questions from others present shall be at the pleasure of the Mayor. AA COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Emeott C — A) Accept Motion to reschedule May 171h to May 24`h or B) Accept Motion to set Public Hearing on Hillary Farm Plan B-2 on May 24"' C) Accept Motion to appoint Kennedy -Graven as Bond Counsel for Sewer Improvement D) Accept Motion to set Public Hearing on Sewer Assessment Plan for May 241h oro PRONOUNCEMENTS & AD U 'MENT Mr. Emeott A A) The next meeting of the City Council is rescheduled to May -/z'-j."and is ordered published in the appropriate edition of the White Bear Press Legal Section. B) Public Hearings on Developer's Plan B-2 and the Sewer Assessment will be held on May and are ordered published in the appropriate edition of the White Bear Pre s Legal ccti ith supplemental notices to affected land owners as required. % � ADJOURNMENT: Motion By I / Second By Unanimous Vote & Emeott Approval at _ �.m. Page 1 of 1 Nr f J �' '�617 62ft-2 CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.2004-01 MAY, 2004 A Public Hearing forthe purpose ofreceiving public comment on (proposed) Public Improvement ProjectNo. 2004- 01, installation of sanitary sewer at Scheuneman Road from approximately a point near Kahl Circle thence 2,100 feet south to the south entrance to Hilary Farm was convened by Mayor Emeott before the Gem Lake City Council on Monday, 24 May 2004 at 8:05 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at 1493 East County Road E in Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Igo, Watson and Birkebak, Clerk Magnuson, City Attorney Newcome, Special Counsel Johnson, City Engineer Parotti and Acting Planning Commission Chair Lindner were present along with Mr. McNulty and his associates and approximately 30 residents of Gem Lake. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, and on Motion by Igo and Second by Birkebak, the Agenda for the Public Hearing was unanimously approved. For the record, Magnuson indicated that a notice of public hearing in the White Bear Press was published on 12 May 2004 and that all affected property owners with real property affected by the project, based upon a certified list secured from Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue, were also notified by direct mail. Mayor Emeott gave a brief overview ofthe process leading to this public hearing, indicating that while several other plans for the development of Hillary Farm have been reviewed, the Plan identified as Plan B-2 includes requirements for construction of sanitary sewer and that the purpose of tonight's public hearing is to formally receive public comment on (proposed) construction of approximately 2,100 feet of sanitary sewer in accordance with Gem Lake ordinances and State of Minnesota statutes. Mr. Parotti then presented his report titled "Feasability Report, Sewer Extension, Blue Spruce Estates to Hillary Farmreviewing it's various components and associated costs. A copy ofthe report is attached hereto. Specifically, Parotti reported that the report was ordered prior to SEH's knowledge of Ramsey County's willingness to reconstruct the road. Hence, the original feasability study considered 3 options while numbers have been amended to reflect reduction in costs based upon Ramsey County roadway reconstruction funding. Mr. Lindner then indicated the Planning Commission felt that based upon comments from the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO), the City Engineer, and other experts, construction of a sanitary sewer for this part of the City was in the best interest of the general and environmental health and welfare of the community. Mr. Magnuson then reported on Ramsey County involvement in the project relative to rebuilding the road following construction of the sewer for the project, providing further history of the Functional Roadway Consolidation Plan of 1993, actions taken by the Council at that time, failure by Ramsey County to complete the program with Gem Lake, and opportunities created by the program today. Effective this day, Ramsey County has agreed in principal to reimburse the City of Gem Lake in an amount estimated at $170,000 for reconstruction of Scheuneman Road from Otter Lake Road south to Highway 61. This will, in turn, allow a very cost effective construction of sanitary sewer to properties adjacent the construction. The project will also be enhanced by today's low interest rates. Finally, Mr. Magnuson noted this was also an opportunity to address the many concerns expressed by the residents along and adjacent to Scheuneman Road regarding traffic and speed problems as Gem Lake residents will have substantially more input into a city street than we do with County Roads. In all, a combination of factors all coming together will yield a project with costs attendant to benefitted property owners of approximately $6,000 or less than 33% of what these costs might otherwise have been. Mr. Newcome then spoke and indicated it is the intention of the City to order an immediate review of Ordinance No. 64 (the "Sewer Ordinance") to prepare amendments to the ordinance that will allow deferred hook up to the sewer once constructed and cost sharing based upon benefitted property rather than simple front footage. This will be a top priority if the improvement is ordered. Mr. Scruggs was then recognized and he asked if the sewer would be available to those north of Kahl Circle. Mayor Emeott replied that a 2/3 majority of the property owners is required for a project to be implemented and that he has attempted to contact all property owners north of Kahl Circle to Otter Lake Road to determine their interest in same. To date, he has been unable to gain a 100% finding and encouraged those interested to talk as soon as possible with tier neighbors. If interest is determined, a second Public Improvement Project will be implemented immediately upon proper notification. CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING HILLARY FARM SUBDIVISION, PLAN, B-2 MAY, 2004 A Public Hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on an Application For Subdivision of Lands submitted by McNulty Construction Company and Hillary Farm, LLC and identified as Plan B-2 was convened by Mayor Emeott before the Gem Lake City Council on Monday, 24 May 2004 at 7:07 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at 1493 East County Road E in Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Igo, Watson and Birkebak, Clerk Magnuson, City Attorney Newcome, Special Counsel Johnson, City Engineer Parotti and Acting Planning Commission Chair Lindner were present along with Mr. McNulty and his associates and approximately 30 residents of Gem Lake. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, and on Motion by Watson and Second by Bosak, the Agenda for the Public Hearing was unanimously approved. For the record, Magnuson indicated that a notice of public hearing in the White Bear Press was published on 12 May 2004 and that all property owners with real property located within 350' of the Hillary Farm property, based upon a certified list secured from Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue, were also notified by direct mail. Magnuson further noted that, for the record, the Application for Plan B-2 is considered complete to the satisfaction of the City. Mayor Emeott gave a brief overview of the process leading to this public hearing, indicating that several other plans have been reviewed in similar hearings, that this plan has been reviewed in other public meetings, and that the purpose of tonight's public hearing is to formally receive public comment on Plan B-2 in accordance with Gem Lake ordinances and State of Minnesota statutes. Mr. Lindner as Acting Chairman of the Planning Commission was recognized and presented the findings of the Planning Commission who have worked on this development proposal for more than 7 months. Lindner indicated that the Planning Commission has adopted a resolution recommending the City Council approve Plan B-2 as being in concert with the various goals of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan and both Ordinance No. 43 (the "Zoning Ordinance") and Ordinance No. 58 (the "Subdivision Ordinance"). Included in their recommendation to the City Council are a list of40 conditions that must be met to insure these goals and objectives are met. Mr. Magnuson then reported on Ramsey County involvement in the project relative to rebuilding the road following construction of the sewer for the project, providing a history of the Functional Roadway Consolidation Plan of 1993, actions taken by the Council at that time, failure by Ramsey County to complete the program with Gem Lake, and opportunities created by the program today. Effective this day, Ramsey County has agreed in principal to reimburse the City of Gem Lake in an amount estimated at $170,000 for reconstruction of Scheuneman Road from Otter Lake Road south to Highway 61. This will, in turn, allow a very cost effective construction of sanitary sewer to properties adjacent the construction. The project will also be enhanced by today's low interest rates. Finally, Mr. Magnuson noted this was also an opportunity to address the many concerns expressed by the residents along and adjacent to Scheuneman Road regarding traffic and speed problems as Gem Lake residents will have substantially more input into a city street than we do with County Roads. Mr. McNulty then presented an overview of his company, it's history with the property and the Plan identified as B-2, highlighting it's evolution to final form. Mayor Emeott then requested comments from those present asking that those who have not been heard previously be recognized first and that comments be limited to 3 minutes each.. Mr. Grundhoffer, Ms. Brown, Mr. Jantz, Mr. John, Mrs. John, Mr. Scruggs, Mr. Terry and several others made comments and asked questions of Mr. McNulty, the Council and Mr. Newcome. Generally, Mr. Jantz and Ms. Brown expressed concern over the variance from 3 acre minimum zoning. Mr. Watson and Mr. Newcome indicated that 3 additional lots were necessary to insure economic feasability of the project since the City was requiring a plan with sewer contrary to our ordinance. Mr. John asked if the community was paying for sewer in the development and Mr. Bosak and Mr. Newcome indicated that the development is underwriting and diluting the cost of the sewer. Mr. Johnson indicated this is the least expensive public improvement of this magnitude he has seen. Other questions were asked and answered. Mayor Emeott then thanked all those present for appearing this evening and indicated the matter would be considered by the City Council later in the evening. There being no further business, Motion to adjourn by Watson and Second by Birkebak was unanimously approved. Mayor Emeott declared the proceedings adjourned 8:05 PM. AUTHORED: 25 May 2004 APPROVED: 21 June 2004 ATTEST: Q ATTEST: Frederic C. Ma-, Paul R. Emeott City Clerk Mayor efile: hearings/2004/HilFazmPlanB-2Minutes.wpd r� CITY OF GEM LAKE MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY, 2004 The May, 2004 meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 24 May 2004, at 8:45 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Bosak, Igo, Watson and Birkebak, Clerk Magnuson, City Attorney Newcome, Special Counsel Johnson, City Engineer Parotti, and Acting Planning Commission Chair Lindner were present along with Mr. McNulty and his associates and approximately 30 residents of Gem Lake. Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, the following actions were taken: 1) unanimous approval of the City Council Meeting Minutes for 19 April 2004 and 05 May 2004 (continuation) as presented on Motion by Watson, Second by Birkebak; and, 2) unanimous approval of the City Council Meeting Agenda as amended for 24 May 2004 on Motion by Bosak, Second by Watson. Magnuson then presented General Announcements. Magnuson reported satisfaction of the violation of City ordinances at Singh Enterprises, d/b/a/ HCO. Review of the Sheriff s reports was tabled to June. Magnuson then reported that Vadnais Heights has been billing Tousley Ford since 1995 when water was connected to their facility from Vadnais Heights. Magnuson noted that no Joint Powers Agreement for this exists and the matter is being reviewed. It is possible that Vadnais Heights could owe Tousley as much as $14,000 in over paid sewer charges. Magnuson further noted that Vadnais Heights appears to be hesitant to continue to provide plowing/sanding and sewer flushing services in the future and that Magnuson will institute a search for independent contractors. Following reading aloud by Magnuson for the benefit of those present, Motion by Watson and Second by Birkebak to adopt Resolution No. 2004-04 as presented approving with conditions the Application for Subdivision of lands identified as Plan B-2 submitted by McNulty Construction for Hillary Farm, LLC was approved by a vote of 5 Aye, 0 Nay and 0 Abstain. Following approval, Mr. McNulty presented Mr. Newcome with a letter formally withdrawing all previously submitted plans including those identified as `B", "D" and "G". Mayor Emeott and the Council then thanked Mr. McNulty for his patience, foresight and willingness to work with the community to create what we believe will be ane exceptional development. Following reading aloud by Magnuson for the benefit of those present, Motion by Watson and Second by Bosak to adopt Resolution No. 2004- 06 as amended and approving the turn back to the City of Gem Lake from Ramsey County of Scheuneman Road from it's intersection with Otter Lake Road on the north to it's intersection with State Highway 61 on the south was approved by a vote of 5 Aye, 0 Nay and 0 Abstain. The matter will now be sent to the Ramsey County Board for affirmation and Ramsey County Public Works for finalization of funding. Following reading aloud by Magnuson for the benefit of those present, Motion by Birkebak and Second by Watson to adopt Resolution No. 2004-05 as presented and approving ordering of Public Improvement Project No. 2004-01 was approved by a vote of 5 Aye, 0 Nay and 0 Abstain. Following reading aloud by Magnuson for the benefit of those present, Motion by Igo and Second by Bosak to adopt Resolution No. 2004-07 as presented and approving official intent to reimburse expenditures for governmental purposes from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds to be issued to fund Public Improvement Project No. 2004-01 was approved by a vote of 5 Aye, 0 Nay and 0 Abstain. Following reading aloud by Magnuson for the benefit of those present, Motion by Igo and Second by Watson to adopt Resolution No. 2004-08 as presented and approving a retail tobacco license for Singh Enterprises, d/b/a Marathon and HCO was approved by a vote of 5 Aye, 0 Nay and 0 Abstain. Motion by Birkebak and Second by Igo to NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 was approved by a vote of 5 Aye, 0 Nay and 0 Abstain. Motion by Igo and Second by Bosak to approve Accounts Payable for April/May as prepared by Magnuson and totaling $36,656.45 was unanimously approved. Motion by Watson, second by Igo to accept the May Treasurer's Report as prepared by Cobian and indicating a balance in the General Fund of $47,143.83 and in the Sewer Fund of $28,509.33 was unanimously approved. Motion by Birkebak and Second by Watson to approve the Clerk's transfer of funds between the sewer fund during the next sixty days to accommodate cash flow needs prior to receipt of 2004 taxes payable from Ramsey County was approved by a vote of 5 Aye, 0 Nay and 0 Abstain. The next meeting of the Gem Lake City Council is scheduled for 21 June 2004. Councilor Watson indicated a scheduling conflict will keep him from attending. There being no further business at 9:30 PM, Motion by Igo and Second by Watson to adjourn was unanimously approved. Mayor Emeott declared the proceedings adjourned. AUTHORED: 25 May 2004 APPROVED: 21 June 2004 ATTEST: Frederic C. Magn n City Clerk ATTEST: _ a X AMOA Paul R. Emeott Mayor efile: minutes/2004/167maym2004.wpd 11 County Road E East City of Gem LakeGem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Dale E. Swomley & Gretchen P. Artig Swomley 1430 Goose Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4121 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Stanley Vomacka 3900 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Michael S. Strommer & Ann L. Strommer 3910 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Kenneth Defiel & Marcia Defiel 3884 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 1369 County Road E East Michael J. Hurt & Lisa E. Hurt Knut E.Skjerseth & Gladys Skjerseth 3880 Scheuneman Road 3836 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Gerturde A. Hannah John M. Hurt & Linda J. Hurt 3825 Schenueman Road 3824 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 551104143 Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 1369 County Road E East Steven Shepherd & Penny Shepherd David R. Hanson & Jennifer R. Hanson j 3809 Scheuneman Road 3812 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4143 Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 1369 County Road E East Hansen Investments LLC David K. Gardner & Leslie D. Gardner 1231 Little FoxRoad 1430 Tanque Verde Loop Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4117 Tucson, AZ 85749-9778 City of Gem Lake Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 1369 County Road E East Thomas F. Rasmussen & Laura E. Rasmussen Richard J. Arcand 1395 East County Road E 3671 Highway 61 North + Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Gem Lake, MN 44110-4104 City of Gem Lake ]''-4cCounty Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 _ I Elizabeth F. Murphy 385 North Point Road, #501 Osprey, FL 34229-8984 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Martin P. Meyer 3926 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 551104145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Tolomeo L. Ong & Matilda S. Ong 3801 Scheneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4143 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 1 Alan M. Becicka & Leah R. Becicka 1393 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Derek D. Wippich & Sarah J. S. Wippich 3860 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Michael M.Bialke & Nancy A. Bialke 3872 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Kou K. Vang & Xue Vang 538 Arlington Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55101-3236 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Marilyn A. Sievers & Anyrine D. Classen 3667 Highway 61 North Gem Lake, MN 55110-4104 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Shirley M. Goff 3930 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Timothy E. Draine & Cynthia M. Draine 3815 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4143 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 SROAGL, INC. 1369 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Jason M. Dolan & Susanne M. Dolan 3848 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-5336 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Janet L. Franz & Joseph I Franz 4020 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4113 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Bryan M. Hansen 2710 South Shore Boulevard White Bear Lake, MN 55110-3920 City of Gem Lake 13-)County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Patrick Bulen 3955 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 t Telephone: ( 651) 426 - 6443 Mobile: (612) 812 — 6139 444W� �* aw CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 PUBLIC NOTICE NO.2004-11 DATE: 06 May 2004 FROM: Fritz Magnuson, City Clerk TO: Press Publications, Legal Publications @ le,,als@sherbtel.net RE: Legal Notice To Be Published To Whom It May Concern, Facsimile: ( 651) 426 — 6444 Email: GemLakeCity@aol.com %Q The following Legal (Public) Notice is to be published in the Legal Notices Section of the 12 May 2004 edition of the White Bear Press. Please confirm receipt and verify content is in acceptable form for use. City of Gem Lake - Public Notice No. 2004-11 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Gem Lake City Council will hold a Public Hearing in accordance with the requirements of Ordinances No. 58 and 43 at 7:00 PM on Monday, 24 May 2004, in the first floor meeting room of Tousley ford located at 1493 East County Road E in the City of Gem lake. 'ncc purpose of the Public Hearing will be to receive public comment on an application f'or subdivision identified as Hillary Farm, Plan B-2 submitted by McNulty Construction Company, d/b/a Hillary Farms LLC. The subdivision plan includes 29 total lots and would require variances and zoning changes. The parcel to be developed is approximately 86.65 acres more or less and is located at 3841 Schcuneman Road. Known as Hillary Farm, the property was previously owned by Judson and Barbara Bemis, is located in the R-1 Residential District, and is identified as Ramsey County Property ID Number 27-30-22- 24-0004. Anyone wishing to make comment regarding this proposed subdivision will be heard. Additionally, written comments may be forwarded to the City Clerk and should be sent so as to be received on or before 21 May 2004. Ssl/FredericC. Magnuson, City Clerk J5c1x ,49;WZI ff.4eW `1 a Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 �/, W11011-10& c, FIELD(Name 1) FIELD(Name2) FIELD(Street) FIELD(City), FIELD(ST) FIELD(Zip) Dear Gem Lake Property Owner, CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Email: gemlakeeity@aol.com ),,/Cm2off 9/ayai Facsimile: (651) 426 - 6444 C3o/e6 Cob/a1Z Ciaatrvrni 12 May 2004 Supplemental to the original applications for subdivision received from McNulty Construction Company, d/b/a Hillary Farm, LLC, the City of Gem Lake has received one (1) additional Application for Subdivision of Real Property in Gem Lake known as Plan B-2 and the real property is located within 350' ofyour property. The real property proposed for subdivision is the approximately 83.0 f acres known as Hillary Farm and formerly owned by Judson and Barbara Bemis. The property is located along the west side of Scheuneman Road between 3841 Scheuneman Road (south entrance) and 3955 Scheuneman Road (north entrance) and is identified by Ramsey County Property ID Number 27-30- 22-24-0004. Additionally, a parcel of approximately 3.0 acres previously owned by David K. and Leslie D. Gardner has been acquired and may be combined with the Bemis property to create a parcel to be subdivided of 86.65f acres. The purpose of this hearing is to receive additional public comment on Plan B-2, which has evolved as a result of your previous input and through discussion among the members of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The following is a copy of the Legal Notice that has been placed in the 12 May 2004 edition of the White Bear Press: City of Gem Lake Public Notice No. 2004-10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Gem Lake City Council will hold a Public Hearing in accordance with the requirements of Ordinances No. 58 and 43 at 7:00 PM on Monday, 24 May 2004, in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at 1493 East County Road E in the City of Gem Lake. The purpose ofthe Public Hearing will be to receive public comment on an application for subdivision identified as Hillary Farm, Plan B-2 submitted by McNulty Construction Company, d/b/a Hillary Farms LLC. The subdivision plan includes 29 total lots and would require variances and zoning changes. The parcel to be developed is approximately 86.65 acres more or less and is located at 3841 Scheuneman Road. Known as Hillary Farm, the property was previously owned by Judson and Barbara Bemis, is located in the R-1 Residential District, and is identified as Ramsey County Property ID Number 27-30-22-24-0004. Anyone wishing to make comment regarding this proposed subdivision will be heard. Additionally, written comments may be forwarded to the City Clerk and should be sent so as to be received on or before 21 May 2004. Ss//FredericC. Magnuson, City Clerk If you have any questions prior to the public hearing you may contact me at my office at the telephone number above. You may also provide written comments as long as they are received at my office on or before 21 May 2004. Regards, CITY OF GEM LAKE F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk & Zoning Co -Administrator efile:PublicNotice2004-1 OMail.wpd City of Gem Lake 114-9 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Current Owner / Resident 1330 Goose Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4171 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Linda L. Hoeschler & Roger Katzenmauer Trustee 1630 Edgcumbe Road St. Paul, MN 55116 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Billy A. John & Judith A. John 4015 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4114 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Daniel P. Marier & Mary J. Marier 4000 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4113 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Dean A. Jantz 3985 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 5510-4146 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Charles A. Rudisel 3963 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4146 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Mary M. & Gary P. Limborg Trustee 2979David Circle Little Canada, MN 55117 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Michael P. Garrett & Tony Scornovacco 1385 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Kenneth J. Wilson 102 Dellwood Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55110 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 William J. Flaspeter 4010 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4113 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 James W. Bender & Sally A. Bender 3984 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 James G. Terry 3970 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Paul R. Emeott & Karen M. Emeott 3960 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Gerhardt V. Meyer & Loma R. Meyer 4285 Virginia Court St. Paul, MN 55126-2382 Mr. Scruggs then asked if city water might also become available. Mr. Magnuson indicated this was a completely separate topic for discussion and that is was far more complex than construction of the sewer. Mayor Emeott asked Mr. Lindner to elaborate on efforts to date. Mr. Lindner supported by Mr. Magnuson indicated that the water project needs to be done essentially for the entire City with estimated attendant cost of more than $2 million and supply problem resolution. The matter is at least one or more years distant. Additional comments from Mr. Limborg, Mr. Jantz, and Mr. John were received and addressed by various members of the Council. Mayor Emeott then thanked all those present for appearing this evening and indicated the matter would be considered by the City Council later in the evening. There being no further business, Motion to adjourn by Bosak and Second by Birkebak was unanimously approved. Mayor Emeott declared the proceedings adjourned 8:45 PM. AUTHORED: 25 May 2004 APPROVED: 21 June 2004 ATTEST: ATTEST: Frederic C. 50niisor Paul R. Emeott City Clerk � Mayor efile: hear6ngs/2004/PIP2004-01SewerMinutes.wpd r"qeo gooY Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 Mobile: (612 ) 812 — 6139 a* a�d CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 I&W9 eaiiil9aw PUBLIC NOTICE NO.2004-12 DATE: 06 May 2004 FROM: Fritz Magnuson, City Clerk TO: Press Publications, Legal Publications @ legals(cbslierbtel.net RE: Legal Notice To Be Published To Whom It May Concern, Facsimile: ( 651) 426 — 6444 Email: GemLakeCity@aol.com The following Legal (Public) Notice is to be published in the Legal Notices Section of the 12 May 2004 and the 19 May 2004 editions of the White Bear Press. Please confirm receipt and verify content is in acceptable form for use. City of Gem Lake Public Notice No. 2004-12 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Gem Lake City Council will hold a Public Hearing in accordance with MN Statutes and the requirements of Gem Lake Ordinance No. 64 at 7:00 PM on Monday, 24 May 2004, in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at 1493 East County Road E in the City of Gem Lake. The purpose of the Public Hearing will be to discuss and receive public comment on (Proposed) Public Improvement No_ 2004-01, Installation of Municipal Sanitary Sewer pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The proposed sanitary sewer would be constructed along Scheuneman Road commencing at it's intersection with Kahl Circle and thence southerly approximately 2,100 feet to a point adjacent the south entrance to Hillary Famr, located at 3841 Scheuneman Road. The area proposed to be assessed is the property with addresses from 3841 Scheuneman Road through 4031 Scheuneman Road and 4039 Scheuneman Road (Gem Lake Hills Golf Course). The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. A reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at the hearing. Anyone wishing to make comment regarding this (Proposed) Public Improvement will be heard. Additionally, written comments may be forwarded to the City Clerk and should be sent so as to be received on or before 21 May 2004 to the following address: Office of the City Clerk 1369 East County Road "E" Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Ss//FredericC. Magnuson, City Clerk J5fzr ✓ffaywaJoff CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com Facsimile: (651) 426 - 6444 Cih> Clad you/u`mea/f 9%yoi cfoiol Co6ia� `��;� �• r Public Notice No. 2004-12 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Gem Lake City Council will hold a Public Hearing in accordance with MN Statutes and the requirements of Gem Lake Ordinance No. 64 at 7:00 PM on Monday, 24 May 2004, in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at 1493 East County Road E in the City of Gem Lake. The purpose of the Public Hearing will be to discuss and receive public comment on (Proposed) Public Improvement No. 2004-01, Installation of Municipal Sanitary Sewer pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The proposed sanitary sewer would be constructed along Scheuneman Road commencing at it's intersection with Kahl Circle and thence southerly approximately 2,100 feet to a point adjacent the south entrance to Hillary Farm, located at 3841 Scheuneman Road. The area proposed to be assessed is the property with addresses from 3841 Scheuneman Road through 4031 Scheuneman Road and 4039 Scheuneman Road (Gem Lake Hills Golf Course). The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. A reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at the hearing. Anyone wishing to make comment regarding this (Proposed) Public Improvement will be heard. Additionally, written comments may be forwarded to the City Clerk and should be sent so as to be received on or before 21 May 2004 to the following address: Office of the City Clerk 1369 East County Road "E" Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Should you have questions regarding this Public Hearing, please contact my office or Mayor Emeott. CITY OF GEM LAKE 3" F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson City Clerk Page 1 of 1 City of Gem Lake Lz"Vounty Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Dale E. Swomley & Gretchen P. Artig Swomley 1430 Goose Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4121 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Stanley Vomacka 3900 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Michael J. Hurt & Lisa E. Hurt 3880 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Gerturde A. Hannah 3825 Schenueman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4143 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Steven Shepherd & Penny Shepherd 3809 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4143 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Hansen Investments LLC 1231 Little FoxRoad Gem Lake, MN 55110-4117 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Thomas F. Rasmussen & Laura E. Rasmussen 1395 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Michael S. Strommer & Ann L. Strommer 3910 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Kenneth Defiel & Marcia Defiel 3884 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Knut E.Skjerseth & Gladys Skjerseth 3836 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 John M. Hurt & Linda J. Hurt 3824 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 David R. Hanson & Jennifer R. Hanson 3812 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 David K. Gardner & Leslie A Gardner 1430 Tanque Verde Loop Road Tucson, AZ 85749-9778 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Richard J. Arcand 3671 Highway 61 North Gem Lake, MN 44110-4104 City of Gem Lake County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 John L. Hannaford & Gregory A. Kvam Trustees 1330 Goose Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4171 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Linda L. Hoeschler & Roger Katzenmauer Trustee 1630 Edgcumbe Road St. Paul, MN 55116 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Billy A. John & Judith A. John 4015 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4114 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Daniel P. Marier & Mary J. Marier 4000 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4113 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Dean A. Jantz 3985 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 5510-4146 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Charles A. Rudisel 3963 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4146 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Mary M. Limborg & Gary P. Limborg Trustee 2979 David Circle Little Canada, MN 55117 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Michael P. Garrett & Tony Scornovacco 1385 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Kenneth J. Wilson 102 Dellwood Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55110 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 William J. Flaspeter 4010 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4113 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 James W. Bender & Sally A. Bender 3984 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 James G. Terry 3970 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Paul R.Emeott & Karen M. Emeott 3960 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Gerhardt V. Meyer & Loma R. Meyer 4285 Virginia Court St. Paul, MN 55126-2382 Road East Elizabeth F. Murphy 385 North Point Road, #501 Osprey, FL 34229-8984 City of Gem Lake Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Martin P. Meyer 3926 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Tolomeo L. Ong & Matilda S. Ong 3801 Scheneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4143 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 _1 Alan M. Becicka & Leah R. Becicka 1393 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Derek D. Wippich & Sarah J. S. Wippich 3860 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Michael M.Bialke & Nancy A. Bialke 3872 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4142 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Kou K. Vang & Xue Vang 538 Arlington Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55101-3236 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Marilyn A. Sievers & Anyrine D. Classen 3667 Highway 61 North Gem Lake, MN 55110-4104 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Shirley M. Goff 3930 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4145 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Timothy E. Draine & Cynthia M. Draine 3815 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-4143 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 South Road Owners Association of Gem Lake, Inc. 1369 East County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Jason M. Dolan 3848 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-5336 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Janet L. Franz & Joseph J. Franz 4020 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, AIN 55110-4113 City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Bryan M. Hansen & c/o Richard M. Hansen 2710 South Shore Boulevard White Bear Lake, MN 55110-3920 City of Gem Lake l' mntc Road E East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Patrick Bulen 3955 Scheuneman Road Gem Lake, MN 55110 j Feasibility Report Sewer Extension Blue Spruce Estates to Hillary Farm Prepared for the City of Gem Lake MAY 249 2004 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer der the a s o the State f M' esota. i David D. Mitchell, PE Date: May 24, 2004 Reg. No.: 20028 i SEH Multidisciplined. Single Source. Trusted solutions for more than 75 years. Project History Location The project is located in east Gem Lake along Scheuneman Road, generally between Kahl Circle (Blue Spruce Estates) and TH 61. The proposed development of Hillary Farm lies on the west side of Scheuneman Road. There are also three existing homes and Gem Lake Hills golf course on the west side, at the northerly end or the project area. The east side of Scheuneman Road is residential in nature with existing homes. Project Purpose The project would provide sanitary sewer service to the Hillary Farm development. The project would also provide sanitary sewer service to other homes and properties along Scheuneman Road that are currently on septic systems. The City is aware of four properties that are interested in sanitary sewer service from the project. Existing Conditions Streets Scheuneman Road is an existing Ramsey County roadway with undefined ditches. The surface is approximately 24 feet wide, paved, and generally moderate to poor condition. Scheuneman Road is a potential turn back roadway from Ramsey County to Gem Lake. Public Utilities There are no existing public utilities in the project area in or along Scheuneman Road. Sanitary sewer does exist at the intersection of Kahl Circle and Scheuneman Road, approximately 500 feet north of the Hillary Farm development. Private Utilities Overhead power exists along the length of the project. Generally the power line is on the west side of Scheuneman Road along the north half of the project and on the east side along the south half of the project. Cable Television exists on the power poles with the electric utility. Telephone and gas utilities are buried in the right of way of Scheuneman Road. Septic Systems Septic systems in the area range in age from new to failing. The City is aware of several systems that have failed in the project area. There are a several septic systems within the project service area that have been constructed new or replaced within the last five years. Proposed Improvements Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Sewer would be extended from the intersection of Kahl Circle and Scheuneman Road. There have been three options identified to serve this area with sanitary sewer. Option 1 — Extend sanitary sewer approximately 500 feet southerly from Kahl Circle to the northeast corner of the Hillary Farm development. This would provide the development access to sanitary sewer while minimizing cost to the City. The sanitary sewer could be installed along the centerline of Scheuneman Road. Construction would likely remove a majority of Scheuneman Road requiring the restoration of nearly 1500 square yards of bituminous roadway. The total project cost of this option is $100,800 Option 2 — Extend sanitary sewer approximately 1300 feet southerly from Kahl Circle to the proposed north entrance to the Hillary Farm development. This would provide the development access to sanitary sewer while providing sanitary sewer service to existing homes wanting service from the City. The sanitary sewer would be installed along the centerline of Scheuneman Road. The total project cost of this option is $240,900. Option 3 — Extend sanitary sewer approximately 2100 feet southerly from Kahl Circle to the proposed south entrance to the Hillary Farm development. This would provide the development access to sanitary sewer while providing sanitary sewer service to the existing homes along Scheuneman Road. The sanitary sewer would be installed along the centerline of Scheuneman Road to the vicinity of the south entrance to the Hillary Farm development. The total project cost of this option is $381,000 if the sewer is constructed in the existing street. All of these options assume roadway restoration costs that conform to Ramsey County turnback program. The options anticipate minimal restoration costs for ditches, yards, culvert crossings, and other miscellaneous features. Maintenance Impact The construction of any of the options outlined above will result in the addition of the respective length of sanitary sewer utility that will require periodic inspections and maintenance. Right of Way and Easements It is anticipated that all construction will take place within the existing right of way to Scheuneman Road or easements dedicated by the developer. The exception to this would be for the construction of service stubs to individual homes. It is anticipated that necessary access to properties for this purpose could be obtained through informal rights of entry rather than formal easements. Permits Permits would have to be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) for the sanitary sewer extension. A permit would have to be obtained from Ramsey County for work within the County Right of Way (Scheuneman Road). Estimated Costs A detailed cost estimate can be found attached to this report. The estimate was developed based on anticipated construction costs for the 2004 construction season. The estimates include a 10 percent contingency for construction and a 30 percent administrative fee for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. The following is a summary of the project cost: Kahl Circle N. Prop. Line N. Entrance To Hillary Farms Hillary Farms N. Property To To Line Hillary N. Entrance S. Entrance Total — All Farms Hillary Farms Hillary Farms Segments Sewer Construction $48,000 $65,000 $65,000 $178,000 Street Construction $22,400 $33,000 $33,000 $88,400 Subtotal Construction $70,400 $98,000 $98,000 $266,400 10% Contingency $7,100 $9,800 $9,800 $26,700 Total Construction $77,500 $107,800 $107,800 $293,100 30% Administrative Costs (Legal, Finance, $23,300 $32,300 $32,300 $87,900 Engineering, etc.) Total Project Cost $100, 800 $140,100 $140,100 $3 81,000 Financing The City has discussed a number of options to finance this project. Those options are outlined below: Option 1 — Assessing a portion or the entire project cost to the benefited properties. This assessment could be levied on a "unit" basis or "front foot" basis for properties adjacent to the improvement. Option 2 — The City could enter into an agreement with the developer by which the developer constructs the improvements at their expense and reimburses the developer as properties connect to the new utility. The City would establish a sewer district with appropriate connection charges as a means to reimburse the developer. An arrangement of this nature typically has a sunset to the agreement. After the sunset date, any connections charges would be retained by the City. In doing so, the developer would be "at risk" for connections that would occur after the sunset date. Option 3 — This option is similar to Option 2. The developer would construct the improvements as a part of their development. The City would fund a portion of the project with general funds, borrowed funds, or enterprise funds. The City would develop a sewer service district for the area benefiting from this improvement. Properties in the "district" would pay a levied charge in addition to the normal connection fees when the connected to the sewer service. The additional funds would be retained by the City as repayment for the improvements financed through the developer. The City is negotiating terms of a turnback agreement with Ramsey County. Terms of that agreement may provide a funding source for portions of the street restoration costs. It is recommended that the connection fees for this district be based on the project costs J not funded by Ramsey County turnback funds divided equally across the units served. This would be 50 residential units plus the golf course property. A potential funding plan for the option to install all segments is as follows: Total Project Cost $381,000 Ramsey County Funding $75,000 (prorated share of turnback funds) Remaining Project Cost $306,000 There are 49 benefited residential units plus the golf course club house. A determination will have to be done on the flows generated from the golf course. Those flows should be stated in the form of Residential Equivalent Units (REU's). For the sake of illustration, we can assume that the golf course generates 1 REU. Given this, the connection charge, or assessment, would equate to $6,000 ($306,000 = 51 = $6,000). Conclusions and Recommendations This project is feasible from and engineering standpoint. The project is necessary to address the needs of sanitary sewer for both the Hillary Farms development and failing septic systems along Scheuneman Road. This project is a cost effective means to address the needs of the community. Based on finding of this report, discussions with Ramsey County, and the City of Gem Lake, we recommend the following course of action for the City of Gem Lake: • This report be accepted as the feasibility report for the herein described project. • A Public Hearing be held to discuss the proposed improvements and assessments. Furthermore, it is recommended that the City proceed with the project in accordance with the following schedule: • Order Feasibility Report • Accept Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing • Public Hearing • Order Improvements • Approve Improvements and Authorize Ad for Bid • Open Bids • Assessment Hearing • Award Construction Contract • Begin Construction • Substantially Complete Construction • Complete Construction J April 19, 2004 May 24, 2004 May 24, 2004 May 24, 2004 July 19, 2004 August 12, 2004 August 16, 2004 September 20, 2004 October 1, 2004 November 30, 2004 June 30, 2005 EEqgSS�QHQ8QHQ8Q85S�Q8y8�gH5H�g8q8Q85S�5H�58�58�58�RS58�5S� g'� a 25 25 25 25 25 25 2mp5� 2f 25 25 25 25 $ 25 S Q �2�pp5 �b�pp N HNNN f2tpp52rpp5 N NN {2{pp5 N V (2�pp5 N N�O/I �2(pp4 VINNNNN t2tpp5 f2/ppS R 4 R fSpp i ■ 8Q C g8g Q85� 25 25 Q8$8jj$j 25 Z5 Q8881Q1llQ$SQ 25 t$ 7$ g 2S 2S Q$8Q 25 2i 25 2$ Q8 Q8 25 2S Q8 Q858j 2$ 25 Q858�8Q 2$ 2$ 25 i$ Q8 25 ■ a F Wu7 C c W ■ ■ ¢ 9> Al—N N ¢ W 7 ONy� yO��OppO NO VO��yO��Npp ONv� 9�:M21,aOW C2 gim7Efif72Zz iii13�i31 m2 c Ztl Fa�zz'L t:FttF�'1a1--52 E)337N O a�xx WCD WU' � 74io3v~, U' 33 ►°• 00000 o 00 000000000 6 Za W Zq ZQF W W(j�LM �d Za aid ww ZIZgi$aa I Z�35j �+Y Z zwwwww73wwg 8 Z W W W U W WT U ,T W, W CJ ¢ 5tuLuz W O 6 W W 0 0 W W W W W W 0 N W LL NNN Q LL N NNNN f0 f/1NS NONNN NfU/77 NVJ N G Z�cW U ¢ Cc ¢ S� ¢ Z Z • U Zgg W < T O Y N Q C-CU w¢ N �gg - >.R W� Cc V 9 i s=o � 3 cr ' '� U. z CcVWJ ru a�inc�=nt�acr5��oo3mY � gggg gg gga�yy �^ N N N a00000000c�oo�0000000000 ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ ¢¢ ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ Z Z w W Z Z W Z Z Z Z W Z Z W Z Z W Z Z Z - Z 2 W 2 Z �_= SV�SV N TU�TU zVVz Ng N zyyz =W= Ng N =�= N =W= fn N§ =a= N _�= =W= N N =a= N yg _�= N 3 =W= N 5 N � �i��i mmmmmmm a CITY OF GEM LAKE Office of the City Clerk i 1369 County Road "E" East Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Telephone: ( 651) 426 - 6443 Mobile: (612 ) 812 — 6139 Gu itJay� 6* 6&d AW96eo `.tla'PW PUBLIC NOTICE NO.2004-10 DATE: 06 May 2004 FROM: Fritz Magnuson, City Clerk TO: Press Publications, Legal Publications @ leuls@sherbtel.net RE: Legal Notice To Be Published To Whom It May Concern, Facsimile: (651) 426 — 6444 Email: GemLakeCity@aol.com The following Legal (Public) Notice is to be published in the Legal Notices Section of the 12 May 2004 edition of the White Bear Press. Please confirm receipt and verify content is in acceptable form for use. City of Gem Lake Public Notice No. 2004-10 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF MEETING The Gem Lake City Council meeting regularly scheduled for 17 May 2004 has been rescheduled to 7:00 PM on Monday, 24 May 2004, in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at 1493 East County Road E in the City of Gem Lake. This meeting will follow 2 public hearings scheduled for the same time, date and location. Ss//Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk �J CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2004-04 24 May 2004 Whereas, McNulty Construction and Hillary Farms, LLC have submitted an application and payment related thereto for subdivision of lands hereinafter refers-ed to as Hillary Farm in accordance with Plan B-2 last revised on 29 April 2004; and, Whereas, said application has been deemed complete by the City Clerk in accordance with the requirementsof Ordinance No. 58 the "Subdivision Ordinance," and, Whereas, said application and attendant submissions have been reviewed by the Gem Lake Planning Commission, City Council, Zoning Administrator, City Engineer and City Attorney as well as the public at large. Resolved, on Motion by Councilor Watson and Second by Councilor Birkebak to approve the Preliminary Plat entitled Hillary Farm, Plan B-2 as prepared by Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC certified 29 April 2004 (the "Plat") together with a Rezoning of Lot 29 to R-3 Residential (36,000 s.f. minimum) with Final Plat approval and a Variance from the R-1 Residential (3.0 acre minimum) lot size requirements as shown in Table A below, also effective with Final Plat approval, and construction of a municipal sanitary sewer system for the entire project, all based upon the Findings of Fact contained herein and subject to certain Conditions of Approval also contained herein, is approved by the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON BIRKEBAK IGO BOSAK I VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye TABLE A LOT # LOT SIZE VARIANCE LOT # LOT SIZE VARIANCE 8 2.52 acres 0.48 acres 18 2.09 acres 0.91 acres 9 2.59 acres 0.41 acres 19 2.00 acres 1.00 acres 10 2.71 acres 0.29 acres 21 2.19 acres 0.81 acres 11 2.61 acres 0.39 acres 22 2.51 acres 0.49 acres 12 2.20 acres 0.80 acres 23 1.80 acres 1.20 acres 13 2.23 acres 0.77 acres 24 2.62 acres 0.38 acres 14 1.87 acres 1.13 acres 26 2.77 acres 0.23 acres 15 1.85 acres 1.15 acres 27 2.31 acres 0.69 acres 16 2.03 acres 0.97 acres 28 2.72 acres 0.28 acres 17 2.43 acres 0.57 acres FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the Variance from the 3.0 minimum lot requirement for lots shown in Table A continues to provide for an average density of Lots 1 through 28 at or near the 3.0 acre minimum as an average given many lots are greater than the minimum and is necessary to address special needs for providing City owned and operated sanitary sewer to the entire Hillary Farm development based upon the formal recommendations of the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization and the City Engineer and a hardship would result if potential environmental damage to the body of water known as Gem Lake and its attendant waters occurred as part of the intense development of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTSs). 2. The unique character of the property requires variances so that valuable natural resources such as Gem Lake and various wetlands on the property are protected beyond the requirements of City Code; 3. The granting of the variances will allow the Developer to maintain the Bemis Estate house which is important to the character of the community; - 1 - 4. The granting of the variances will allow the developer to protect and preserve beyond the requirements of City Code natural amenities such as trees and wetlands on the property; 5. City required amenities such as paths, view easement and open space require the granting of variances to allow the reasonable development of the property; 6. The City desires that the project be served by sanitary sewer which is not otherwise a requirement of the R-1 zoning district. Without variances it is not reasonable to develop the property with sewer. 7. That the Rezoning of Lot 29 is consistent with the zoning of immediately adjacent properties on the west side of Scheuneman Road and the entire east side of Scheuneman Road. 8. That the creation of a private way within the development maintained solely by the benefitted residents is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance and previous subdivisions approved within the City. 9. That the maintenance requirements of a private way serving a large number of properties necessitate the inclusion of use and maintenance covenants in the declarations to be filed against the property by the Developer. 10. That the Plat is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and addresses certain unique and historical issues relating to past subdivisions within and adjacent to the Plat. 11. That the Developer in concert with the Gem Lake Planning Commission, City Council and members of the community have, through their collective input and effort, created a subdivision consistent with the best interests of the City. 12. That the Developer's Agreement and Plan B-2 address, in essence, the historical density, large lot dimensions, cluster consideration, and environmental preservation issues which further the City's Comprehensive Plan. Further resolved, that the Gem Lake City Council approves McNulty Plan B-2 for Hillary Farm upon the following understandings and agreements and subject to the following conditions: 1. The Plat shall be subject to a Declaration inform and substance satisfactory to and approved by the City Attorney which shall -� be filed for record with the County Recorder of Ramsey County, Minnesota, immediately after recording of the Plat (the "Declaration"). The applicable conditions described below shall be included in the Declaration. 2. All interior wetlands shall be protected by such buffers with permanent monuments delineating the boundary as required by the Watershed District permit. 3. The scenic easement between Lots 6 and 7 shall be maintained by the affected lot owners and will not be released except with written permission of the HOA. The owner of Lot 1 shall have the right to specifically enforce this easement. 4. The road crossing in front of Lots 6 and 7 between the estate house and Gem Lake shall be built as described in the plans or otherwise depressed so that the road itself cannot be seen from across the lake. This restriction will not screen cars that may be traveling on the road. 5. The City Code shall govern as to structures allowed on the island adjacent to Hillary Farm mainland. 6. No access to the lake shall be granted to any non -riparian lot in the Hillary Farm addition. 7. Concrete surmountable curbs as shown in the plans entitled B-2 Submittal prepared by Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, dated April 29, 2004 sheets 1 through 6 shall be required along the road in the areas in which drainage from the road can be expected to flow into interior wetlands so that such drainage is conducted first to settling ponds. 8. Aluminum or vinyl lap siding shall be prohibited in the HOA documents. Aluminum or vinyl maybe used for fascia or soffits. No metal accessory buildings shall be allowed. 9. The location of all structures on the lots shall be subject to City site plan review and approval. 10. All utilities serving the Plat shall be buried. — 2 — 1 1. The access easement serving Lot 2 shall be located so as to allow a buffer line of trees along its easterly side. Such a buffer may be supplemented by trees from the tree bank created as described below. 12. An onsite tree bank will be created based upon the trees removed in the development in excess of the amount allowed by the City tree ordinance and the location of the plantings from the tree bank shall be subject to approval by the City. 1 13.No phosphorous fertilizer as regulated by state law shall be allowed to be used within one -hundred (100') feet of the lake. 14. Requirements listed in City Engineer's report dated 24 May 2004 shall be complied with except as addressed and or modified by this Resolution. 15. Requirements listed in Zoning Administrator's report shall be complied with except as addressed and or modified by this Resolution. 16. Entry monuments at each entry shall be allowed as submitted with subtle lighting as approved by the Zoning Administrator. 17. The lots covered by note 5 on Sheet 6 shall be 2-7 rather than 9-13. 18. The internal road shall be twenty (20') feet wide with a shoulder as approved by the City Engineer. 19. Outlet structures at all detention ponds shall be substantially covered on their sides by ground so as not to be obvious. 20. Hours of work shall be lam to 7pm, Monday through Saturday, with exceptions to be allowed under special circumstances as determined by the zoning administrator. 21. The barn maybe remodeled and used as a sales office and storage facility during the period of sales activity. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for the barn, the Developer shall cooperate with the City in preserving the building as a historical building to be relocated to another site. 22. Building permits (but not certificates of occupancy) maybe granted to the developer in advance of completion of sewer and road work. Any construction done by Developer prior to recording of the Final Plat shall be at the risk of the Developer. �23. The Final Plat shall include a 20 foot wide sewer easement for possible extension to serve property to the northwest at a location along a lot line between Lots 9 and 10. 24. Developer shall install a four (4') foot wide blacktopped trail adjacent to the main roadway at selected locations to be determined by Developer. 25. On the Final Plat Developer shall dedicate to the City a sewer easement in form acceptable to the City. Developer shall guarantee and cause any contractor who does work on the sanitary sewerto guarantee the workmanship and materials of the sewer for a period of one (1) year. All warranties regarding the sewer shall be transferred to the City upon transfer of title to the sewer. 26. A Certificate of Survey for each lot with exact dimensions of the lot, the structures on the lot, the setbacks to the established for each lot, the tree inventory, the slab elevation and first floor elevation of the proposed house must be provided prior to receiving a building permit on each lot. 27. No lot in the Plat shall be further subdivided regardless of any minimum acreage requirements contained in present or future City ordinances. 28. The City's fees, costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with project review shall have been paid in full by the Developer within thirty (30) days of presentation to the Developer of an invoice for said costs, disbursements and fees. 29. Developer shall complete any utility work in Scheuneman Road which is directly related to providing service to the project. 30. All sanitary sewer services shall be approved by the City Engineer. J31. Occupancy permits shall not be issued until the installation of at least the first lift of bituminous on the permanent street, and completion of, sewer, other utilities and curbs. - 3 - 32. Developer's Engineer shall certify to the City that the construction of the sewer and other utilities and roads meet the requirements ofthe approved plans and specifications upon completion and as a condition of acceptance by the City ofthe sanitary sewer. Developer will provide both hard shell Mylar and electronic "as built" plans for the sewer system and shall televise the sewer after completion, giving the pictures and tapes to the City Engineerto confirm that the sewer has been properly constructed. 33. Developer shall pay the cost of the City Engineer to observe the construction of the sanitary sewer within theHillary Farm Development to the extent that the City Engineer deems appropriate. Developer shall furnish the City Engineer with a schedule of proposed operations at least five (5) days before the commencement of construction on each major phase of the project. 34. Developer shall name the City as additional insured on contractor's commercial general liability insurance policies as the City Attorney shall require. 35. The Developer must proceed with the development of the project within (1) year of approval of the Final Plat and the Developer must submit the Final Plat for approval by the City within six (6) months after passage of this Resolution consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and Final Plat requirements or the subdivision approval shall become null and void Ifthe Final Plat varies significantly from the Preliminary Plat, then Planning Commission review and comment and City Council approval shall be required. 36. Within sixty (60) days after the final approval by the City Council, the applicant must record the Plat with the County Recorder of Ramsey County, Minnesota, or the subdivision shall become null and void 37. Construction permits maybe issued for improvements on this subdivision site prior to final approval and recording ofthe Plat, provided however the issuance of such permits and construction of such improvements shall beat the sole risk of the Developer in the event final plat approval is not granted. 38. All utility easements as shown on the Preliminary Plat or as approved by the City Attorney shall be dedicated. 39. Final Plat approval is conditioned upon the installation and funding of sanitary sewer to serve the Hillary Farm development and adjoining property to the City's satisfaction along Scheuneman Road. 40. Upon passage of this Resolution Developer shall withdraw all other plans submitted to the City for the development of the property. ATTEST 1. Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City _ r � _.v i ,.I,,. ,.« 4L. o Al +o F—IF 4t— J l 'J em, L0.Ac on — — 1 a ,m- w,e c �r . �4�rL 24 Ay 2004 Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk Certif ieb Coo 1Ja LC e-file: resolution\2004\no2004-04 -- 4 - May 24, 2004 RE: City of Gem Lake, MN Hillary Farms Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Review SEH No. A-GEMLK0401.00 1-lonorable Mayor Paul Emeott and City Council City of Gem Lake 1300 Goose Lake Road Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Dear Mr. Hoeschler: We have reviewed the recent submittal for the Hillary Farms Subdivision known as Plan B-2 Preliminary Plat submittal. The information received included a Preliminary Plat, Grading Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan, Street Profile and Cross Sections, Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan, Storm Water Management Calculations. We have assumed that the Wetland Delineation Report, Wetland Mitigation Plan, and Wetland Permit Application that have been submitted with previous concepts will also apply to this one. The following are our comments as they pertain to this submittal: General Comments 1. Final design shall include the submittal of soil boring results and geotechnical report along with design recommendations relative to the findings. As a minimum, this would include borings for the streets and utilities, R value for pavement design, pavement subgrade recommendations, pavement design, bearing pressures for homes and other structures, lateral earth pressures, groundwater levels, recommendations for excavations and fills, and recommendations for bedding/installation of buried utilities. Pavements must meet or exceed the requirements of a Mn/DOT 7-ton pavement. The geotechnical report must be signed by a geotechnical engineer licensed in Minnesota, and may need to address additional issues that the geotechnical engineer deems necessary. Preliminary Plat 1. Show lot widths at setback lines. Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan I. Refine the Grading Plan to include some type of conceptual proposed lot grading that relates to the building minimum elevations to solidify proposed drainage boundaries. 2. The impact of the flow leaving the site between building pads 19 and 29should be considered in detail. Consider building locations/impervious areas with regard to the flow/velocities in the proposed swale. This flow could cause erosion or temporary ponding on the adjacent property that currently doesn't exist. 3. The City should be advised that graded swales such as the one shown between building pads 19 and 20 are probable in other areas even though they are not shown on the Grading Plan. If allowed, future custom grading should be carefully scrutinized. Mayor Emeott and Council May 24, 2004 Page 2 4. The calculations were reviewed and are reasonable with respect to the grading plan. 5. Discharge to between lots 19 & 29 needs further evaluation of impacts to the golf course property. If this option is approved, the City Engineer and the developer's engineer should discuss options such as energy dissipation measures for avoiding impacts to adjacent property. 6. Label emergency overflow elevations and HWLs for all ponds, basins and depressions. In particular Basin E and the existing depression west of Lot 11 have the potential for causing basement flooding on lots 25 and I respectively. Lowest openings must be 2-feet above adjacent HWLs. 7. Overflow to be constructed on Lot 5 shall be located to fit the topography. At a field visit on May 20, 2004 (present; Mayer Emeott, John Parotti - SEH, Roger Anderson — Anderson Engineering, and Gary Johnson — Anderson Engineering) it was discovered that the existing contours at this location might not be entirely accurate. The overflow shall be constructed in the location as was identified at this meeting and shall be constructed to minimize tree loss. Any change to location or impact shall require review and approval by the City prior to construction. Street Profile and Cross Sections 1. Revise curb and gutter locations to provide adequate protection of existing wetlands. 2. Drain tile may be required. Geotechnical investigation and recommendations shall address the possible need for drain tile. 3. Recent developments in the City have constructed wider pavement widths than being proposed in this submittal. It is recommended that this development be required to construct a minimum 20- foot pavement width with 2-foot shoulders. The following table provides a summary of the proposed street width with those approved in the Hunter's Run and Blue Spruce developments. Development Pavement Width Shoulder Width Hunter's Run 20-feet 2-feet Blue Spruce Estates 24-feet 0 Hillary Farm B-2 18-feet 1-foot Utility Plan I. The final plat shall include 30-foot (min.) sanitary sewer easement or within street and utility easements that provide a minimum of 15-feet of easement either side of all sanitary sewer mains. Wider easements may be required where sewer depth makes it necessary. Wetland Permit Application Review comments by Todd Udvig, SEH Sr. Wetland Scientist SEH did not receive a wetland permit application with this packet. However, it appears (and will be assumed) that the permit application received with the Concept B plan submittal would also be applicable to the Concept B-2 plan and has been reviewed as such. The following comments were generated for earlier reviews and SEH has not been copied on all correspondence with VLAWMO. The following may be satisfied with supplying SEH with documentation relative to recent VLAWMO action or approvals. I. There is no second alternative design as required. The permit description is not adequate. 2. Applicant must provide additional information with respect to the hydrology of the new wetland. Is there enough hydrology to sustain the new wetland? Will the new wetland hydrology be groundwater or surface water supplied? 3. The sequencing discussion needs to address avoidance and minimization as required. What methods, design, etc. were incorporated to avoid and minimize wetland impacts? Mayor Emeott and Council May 24, 2004 Page 3 4. The Wetland Conservation Act requires 5 years of monitoring, not 3 to 5 years. The Technical Evaluation Panel has the option to review a site and approve it as successful prior to the 5-year period. SEH recommends that the above comments be addressed and written responses be received to facilitate the completion of our review. Any questions with respect to this review can be directed to me or directly to the reviewer as noted above_ Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INCJ John D. Parotti, PE City Engineer c: Mayor Paul Emeott, City of Gem Lake Fritz Magnuson, City Clerk, City of Gem Lake Todd Udvig, SEH Paul Hegre, PE, SEH AJ Schwidder, PE, SEH .:Ulgcw kUMOI(KAcmra4cvicvlu7L:,, I —,., i 52All.duc 0 W" Commentt MLEfETHIS UNE W THIS 1S A I -PAGE LETTER McNulty request for Hillary Farm subdivision City of Gem Lake, MN Preliminary Plat for Option B-2 Zoning Administrator plan review of 5/1 to 5/3/04 The following were provided for this Option B2 plan review: Hillary Farm Concept B-2 pictorial view of subdivision — Dated 4/29/04 Preliminary Plat, Sheet 1 of 6, Dated 1/9/04,. with revision 1,2,3 & 4 Grading, Drainage, Erosion Plan, Sheet 2 of 6, Dated 1/9/04,. with revision 1,2,3 & 4 Street Profile and Cross Sections, Sheet 3 of 6, Dated 1/9/04,. with revision 1,2,3 & 4 Preliminary Utility plan, Sheet 4 of 6, Dated 1/9/04,. with revision 1,2,3 & 4 Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan, Sheet 5 of 6, Dated 1/9/04, with revision 1,2,3 & 4 Preliminary Shoreland Impact Plan, Sheet 6 of 6, with revisions 1,2,3 & 4 Stormwater management calculations Plan B-2 , by Anderson Eng, Dated 4/29/04 General comments and questions 1) The North entrance road, from this proposed subdivision, comes at an angle and a location that the headlights from the vehicles leaving this driveway will shine into the windows of both the Goff home and the Meyer Home on the east side of Schuneman Rd. (See photo attached for view from end of road to houses across the road) This North entrance road must be re -aligned to line up with a driveway, across the road, or to the empty lot between the Meyer home and the Strommer home. This can be done by "kinking" the road to the south instead of the north near to its terminus to Schuneman Rd. 2) Along the sides of the interior roads, concrete curbs have to be supplied, in some areas, to insure that snowplow damage to road edges and shoulder areas immediately adjacent to the wetlands and stormwater ponds does not cause storm water to proceed directly into the wetlands. The supplying of some such curb is shown, on the preliminary plat drawings. It is shown to be provided on the interior road from sta. 25+30 to 32+50. The area from 24+50 to 25+30 also needs to be protected (Stormwater Pond 60P). Additional concrete curbs will also be needed on the west side of the road from Sta. 15+00 to 17+50 (Stormwater pond 41P) and on both sides of the road from sta. 1+00 to 5+00 (Stormwater pond 11P and 10 P and Basin D). The primary purpose of these curbs is to prevent damage to the un-protected roadside by snow plowing and other road maintenance activities that would direct storm water into the wetlands and ponds in a manner not planned for in the design of the stormwater handling facilities. 3) Please provide an updated copy of the "customary restrictive covenants, and homeowners association rules" for review by the Zoning Administrator. I already have a list of concerns from the preliminary copy of this document supplied with the first plat submittal. (McNultyplanb2review) Page 1 of 4 5/3/04 or the entry 4) Please provide information on the exact size of the easement needed f monuments proposed at the North and South driveways. The preliminary plat shows an area 20 feet wide and 40 feet deep on either side of the driveways and the "entry signage and Landscaping" drawing provided shows an area 40 by 40 foot. Will the homeowners association be responsible for the long term maintenance of these areas (this needs to be included in the Homeowners Association rules). 5) Who is responsible for capping the well at the caretakers home site and for obtaining the "changeover permit" for the septic system to public sewer for Lots 1 & 14 ? 6) It is not completely clear that there is a drainage path from Stormwater pond 60P thru Basin G to the proposed outlet at Gem Lake (there seems to be a rise in land just before the lake edge). Are the ground elevations suitable to have this drainage work ? 7) Do the calculations for Stormwater Pond 60P include the water from Stormwater Pond 41P in its Inflow calculations ? 8) On Drawing 4 of 6 (Preliminary Utility plan) examine the locations of the proposed sewer stubs to lots 9 & 10. ( See items 4 & 5 in next section for concerns). Lot specific comments and questions 1) Some sort of a narrow no -cut restriction (or buffer strip re -planting guidelines) needs 1 to be placed along the easternly boundary of lot 2 & 3 to keep some vegitation in place to act as a buffer to the Draine home immediately to the east of this driveway. If the entire 33 foot driveway easement to lot 2 were cleared, any existing buffer would disappear. 2) 2) Some sort of a no -cut guideline needs to be placed along the easternly boundaries of lots 24 & 28 to keep the buffer along Schuneman Rd intact and to in -fact encourage the lot 24 & 28 owners to increase the buffers along Schuneman Rd. 3) Is the two foot level elevation difference between the HWL of Basin D - pond 1 OP and the basement elevation of the proposed house on Lot 20 of 946.0 ft adequate to eliminate any problem with basement flooding? This house pad is shown only about 50 feet from the edge of the pond on the preliminary plat but is shown closer to the road loop (and thus further away from the pond edge) on the pictorial view. 4) Is the two foot level elevation difference between the HWL of Basin G and the basement elevation of the structure on Lot 4 of 954.0 ft adequate to eliminate any problem with basement flooding of the proposed house on this lot ? This house pad is shown only about 50 feet from the edge of the basin and overland outlet to the lake on the preliminary plat. (McNultyplanb2review) Page 2 of 4 5/3/04 5) The house placement and driveway connection for Lot 9, on the pictorial Concept B2 drawing, is much better than what is shown on the preliminary plat. (the pictorial location provides more isolation from the neighbors to the West). Its final location also does change the interior sanitary sewer layout. Which location is to be preferred ? Which view (pictorial or plat) will the prospective house buyers be shown to help them decide where to place their house. Where will the sewer stub be placed (which will define where this house will be placed) ? 6) The house placement and driveway connection for Lot l0,on the pictorial Concept B2 drawing, is better than what is shown on the preliminary plat. Its final location also does change the interior sanitary sewer layout. Which location is to be preferred ? Which view (pictorial or plat) will the prospective house buyers be shown to help them decide where to place their house. Where will the sewer stub be placed (which will define where this house will be placed) ? 7) What restriction will be provided on Lot 5 to keep the island from having a structure constructed on it ? 8) A note should be added to the Lot 1 & 14 locations to advise who is to do the existing septic system abandoments. 9) The notes on drawing 2 of 6, regarding the protected easement for the drainfield location to the rear of the Rudisel home along Schuneman Rd, are inconsistent. One note on this drawing says to protect this easement and the other note says that it will be vacated. Homeowner of Rudisel home also needs easement to enable service on his well, which at the rear side of his property. Has any arrangement been made to resolve these issues ? 10) The note on Lot 11 saying "20 foot driveway easement:" is not needed. Paul Emeott Co -Zoning Administrator (plan reviews) (McNultyplanb2review) Page 3 of 4 5/3/04 �:�-7'^ =.tom,+` ;.LWi _ _�..� .!'�� .Y�,��•jjg�.-,;,�-:!'.c...sc- "^'."'�a.''I Questions for Gem Lake Planning commission 1) Is there a need for the subdivider to plant "boulevard trees" on lots that have no existing trees? Block 1, lots 11 thru 21 have no trees. Subdivision ordinance requires such trees. 2) Define restrictions for construction of any structure on the upland 49,526 sq ft (over 1 acre) of land (island) attached to proposed Lot 5 and located in the body of water called Gem Lake. Should this be a conservation easement. 3) Lot 2 has no frontage on a road. How do we define this ? What should be the described as the "front "yard of this structure ? 4) How faithful to our Comprehensive plan is this proposed subdivision ? 5) It is important that we consider the building height when homes are constructed in a mixed zoning area (R1— 35 foot maximum building height & R2 with 25 foot maximum building height). How are we going to handle this in this subdivision ? What about a building height limitation for the house on the 36,000 sq ft lot on Lot 29 Paul Emeott Co -Zoning Administrator (plan reviews) (McNultyplanb2review) Page 4 of 4 5/3/04 McNULTY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 400 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 612-339-0674 FAX 612-349-2904 May 24, 2004 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Gem Lake 1369 County Road E Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 Re: Hillary Farm Development Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: Please be advised that upon approval on May 24, 2004 by the City Council of the preliminary plat for Plan B-2 as submitted that McNulty Construction Company and Hillary Farm, LLC withdraw the applications for all prior plans for the development that have previously been submitted including Plans B, D and G. Sincerely, z MCNULTY CON RUCTION COMPANY R. la s McN Ity, Pr i, nt J CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2004-05 24 May 2004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, MINNESOTA ODERING CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota (the "City") has received the request of McNulty Construction Company (the "Developer") for the development of certain real property within the corporate limits of the City for the purposes of constructing a development of approximately 29 single family homes (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, the preliminary plan for the Development is known as the Hillary Farm Plan B-2 (the "Preliminary Plat"); and WHEREAS, the majority of the homes in the City currently operate septic systems and are not connected to the metro sanitary sewer system and certain existing homes in the City have septic systems that are failing or will fail in the near future; and WHEREAS, as part of the City's review and approval process for the Development and the Preliminary Plat, the City is requiring that the Developer connect the homes in the Development to the metro sanitary sewer system; and WHEREAS, the main sanitary sewer line for the Developmentwill be constructed under Scheuneman Road and there are other homes in the City abutting Scheuneman Road that will benefit form the construction of the sanitary sewer line under Scheuneman Road and being connected to the metro sanitary sewer system; and WHEREAS, the construction of the sanitary sewer system for the homes abutting Scheuneman Road leading up to the Development and in the Development is hereinafter referred to as the "Improvements"; and WHEREAS, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. ("SEH"), as City engineer and consultant to the City with respect to the Improvements, has prepared a feasibility study for the Improvements and conducted other analysis related to the Improvements (the "Feasibility Report"); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on this date held public hearings on the Preliminary Plat and the /1 Improvements (the "Hearing"); and WHEREAS, ten (10) days mailed notice and two (2) weeks published notice of the Hearing was given to affected homeowners and the Developer and a reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessmenet for the Improvement was made available at the Hearing; and WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report was available for review at the Hearing; and WHEREAS, all affected homeowners and persons who desired to be heard with respect to the proposed Improvements were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE AS FOLLOWS: 1, The Improvements are necessary, cost-effective and feasible as described in the Feasibility Report prepared by SEH. 2. The total estimated cost of the Improvements is $600,000. 3. The Improvements are hereby ordered. 4. SEH is hereby designated as the engineer for the Improvements. SEH shall prepare plans and specifications for make of the Improvements. Kennedy & Graven, Chartered is hereby designated as special counsel to the City with respect to the Improvements. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Birkebak and was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT J WATSON BIRKEBAK [GO BOSAK VOTE Aye I Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. e ,i Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk t� &rtif ieb CoN Date e-file: resolution\2004\no2004-05 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2004-06 24 May 2004 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1993-07 REGARDING GEM LAKE'S PARTICIPATION IN RAMSEY COUNTY FUNCTIONAL CONSOLIDATION OF ROADWAYS BY ACCEPTING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS AND AMENDING THE CONDITIONS OF SUCH AN ACCEPTANCE. WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local Government Services Study Commission to ,report on the advantages and disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating..." activities in areas of public service including public works; and WHEREAS, the Gem Lake City Council did by means of Resolution No. 1993-07 agree to accept ownership of certain Ramsey County roadways in the City of Gem Lake subject to certain conditions: and WHEREAS, The consolidation plan provides for reclassification of roadways and corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and WHEREAS, Scheuneman Road (County Road 147) from Otter Lake Road to Trunk Highway 61, located in the City of Gem Lake, is presently under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as a County Road; and WHEREAS, This roadway has been determined to serve a local function only; and WHEREAS, Revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by resolution of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 163.11; and WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Gem Lake that the street hereinafter described upon tumback from Ramsey County should be designated a City Street under the provisions of Minnesota Law; and WHEREAS, The consolidation plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve the roadway to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over roadway segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey County Capital Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and WHEREAS, The City of Gem Lake desires to reconstruct Scheuneman Road from Otter Lake Road to Trunk Highway 61 and fund the reconstruction project with Municipal State Aid Street sources, and $170,000* from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation; Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED, The City of Gem Lake does hereby concur with the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners revoking the "County Road" status of Scheuneman Road (County Road 147) from Otter Lake Road to Trunk Highway 61, and transferring jurisdiction over this roadway to the City of Gem Lake, effective after the Ramsey County Office of Budgeting and Accounting has encumbered the funds necessary to fund this reconstruction project, and after the County is in receipt of an adopted resolution from the City of Gem Lake concurring with the County revoking the "County Road" status of Scheuneman Road from Otter Lake Road to Trunk Highway 61; and Be It Further RESOLVED, That the County will pay to the City as just compensation for this jurisdiction transfer, $170,000* for the reconstruction of this segment of Scheuneman Road; and Be It Further RESOLVED, The Gem Lake City Clerk is authorized within the limits of this resolution to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdiction change executed; and Be It Further RESOLVED, The City Of Gem Lake recognizes that additional consideration of other Ramsey County roads originally included as part of Gem Lake's Resolution No. 1993-07 remain subject to terms and conditions as previously established and as may be modified by the City Council in the future. * This amount is a preliminary estimate The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Watson and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON BIRKEBAK IGO BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. 4„ 24 ✓dlay zoos Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk (fertif ieb CoPB Date e-file: resolution\2004\no2004-06 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2004-07 24 May 2004 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, MINNESOTA TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN ORIGINAL EXPENDITURES FOR GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAX- EXEMPT BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF GEM LAKE, MINNESOTA AFTER THE PAYMENT OF SUCH ORIGINAL EXPENDITURES WHEREAS, Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2 (the "Reimbursement Regulation"), promulgated pursuant to Section 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), provides that the allocation of the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds to expenditures for governmental purposes originally paid from a source other than such tax-exempt bonds will be treated as expenditures of such tax-exempt bonds only if certain requirements of the Reimbursement Regulation are satisfied by the issuer of such tax-exempt bonds; and WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake, Minnesota, a statutory city and a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the "City"), expects to incur certain original expenditures for governmental purposes to be financed temporarily from sources other than the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds and which are expected to be reimbursed from the proceeds of one or more series of tax-exempt bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEM LAKE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City has a reasonable expectation (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations, Section 1.148-1(b)) that it will make expenditures for the projects generally described in EXHIBIT A attached to this resolution (the "Projects"). The City has a reasonable expectation that it will issue one or more series of tax-exempt bonds (the "Bonds") for each of the Projects in the estimated maximum principal amounts set forth in EXHIBIT A and that it will make reimbursement allocations with respect to such original expenditures from the proceeds of such Bonds. 2. The City Clerk is authorized to designate appropriate additions to EXHIBIT A in circumstances where time is of the essence, and any such designation shall be reported to the Council at the earliest practicable date and shall be filed with the official books and records of the City as provided in Section 3. 3. This resolution shall be maintained as part of the books and records of the City at the main administrative office of the City, and shall be continuously available during normal business hours of the City on every business day of the period beginning not more than thirty days after adoption of this resolution and ending on the last date of issue of any Bonds issued to reimburse expenditures described in EXHIBIT A. 4. This resolution has been adopted not later than sixty (60) days after payment of any original expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of Bonds. 5. All reimbursement allocations with respect to the Bonds will be made not later than eighteen (18) months after the later of: (i) the date the original expenditure is paid; or (ii) the date the Project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three (3) years after the original expenditure. 6. All original expenditures to which reimbursement allocations are to be made constitute: (i) capital expenditures; (ii) costs of issuance of the Bonds; (iii) expenditures for extraordinary, nonrecurring items that are not customarily payable from current revenues, such as casualty losses or extraordinary legal judgments in amounts in excess of reasonable insurance coverage, and for which no reserve is maintained; or (iv) a grant (as defined in Treasury Regulations, Section 1.148-6(d)(4), as a transfer for a governmental purpose of money or property to a transferee that is not a related party to or an agent of the transferor with respect to which no obligation or condition is imposed to directly or indirectly repay any amount to the transferor). -1- 7. The limitations set forth in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this resolution do not apply to: (i) the costs of issuance of the Bonds; (ii) an amount not in excess of the lesser of $100,000 or five percent (5%) of the proceeds of the Bonds; or (iii) preliminary expenditures up to an amount not in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the aggregate issue price of the Bonds that finance or are reasonably expected by the City to finance the Projects for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term "preliminary expenditures" includes architectural, engineering, surveying, soil testing, reimbursement bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of a Project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction. 8. This resolution is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof. The anticipated original expenditures for the Projects set forth at EXHIBIT A and the principal amount of the Bonds set forth in EXHIBIT A are consistent with the City's budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of Bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City's budget or financial policies to pay such Project expenditures. This resolution is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of the Reimbursement Regulation. 10. No reimbursement allocation of the proceeds of the Bonds to Project expenditures will employ an abusive arbitrage device (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations, Section 1.148-10) to avoid the arbitrage restrictions or to avoid the restrictions of Sections 142-7 of the Code. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Igo and was supported by Councilor Bosak and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON BIRKEBAK IGO BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk G E 190-02(B WJ) 248040vl &rtif ieb Cobu Date e-file: resolution\2004\no2004-07 -2- CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO.2004-08 24 May 2004 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE COST SHARING OF CONSULTANT SERVICES TO THE ONGOING I-35E CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STUDY. WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake has partially funded and participated in the multi jurisdictional study of the I-35E Corridor: and WHEREAS, the City of Gem Lake has committed to continue participation as a member in the I-35E Corridor Management Team; and WHEREAS, the Corridor Management Team will continue to coordinate the ongoing balance of land use and transportation within the 1-35E Corridor; and WHEREAS, continued consultant services will be required to assist the Corridor Management Team; and WHEREAS, SEH, Inc. has prepared a scope of services to provide such assistance at a cost to the members in 2004 not to exceed $4,500 for budgeted operations: and WHEREAS, the Corridor Management Team has proposed cost sharing contributions from the participating local units of government as follows: the city of Vadnais Heights @ 25.0%; the City of White Bear Lake@ 25.0%; White Bear Township at 25.0%; North Oaks @ 18.0%; and Gem Lake @ 7.0%; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Ramsey County and the Metropolitan Council have agreed to provide in -kind planning and technical services and project coordination through the course of study. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake agrees to contribute funding an amount not to exceed $315.00 for consultant services from SEH, Inc. for the ongoing I-35E Corridor Management study. ATTEST The foregoing resolution was offered by Councilor Igo and was supported by Councilor Watson and was declared adopted on a unanimous vote of the City Council. I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake on the date first written. �,�� z11 . zoos Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk IN Certli f ieb CoPB Date e-file: reso1utions\2004\No2004-08 CITY OF GEM LAKE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 24 May 2004 WHEREAS, Singh Enterprises, d/b/a Hoffman Corner Oil (HCO), has applied for a Retail Tobacco Products Resellers License for the period 06 April 2004 through 31 December 2004; and WHEREAS, said applicant has been similarly licensed in prior years in the City of Gem Lake; and WHEREAS, said applicant operated the establishment with no incidents during 2003; and WHEREAS, the State OfMinnesota has enacted legislation, reference Chapter227 /H.F. 117, requiring local units ofgovernment to establish or update local ordinances regulating retail tobacco sales and providing for compliance checks, the cost of which shall be born by the licensee; and WHEREAS, the City has a Tobacco Compliance Ordinance No. 68 which became effective 28 February 1998. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby approve renewal of the a RETAIL TOBACCO PRODUCTS RESELLERS LICENSE to Singh Enterprises, d/b/a Hoffman Corner Oil (HCO) for the period 01 April 2004 through 31 December 2004; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City retains the right of revocation at any time in the event of violation of State laws or City ordinances regarding the retail sale of tobacco products. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Councilor Igo and was supported by Councilor Birkebak and was declared adopted based upon the following vote: NAME EMEOTT WATSON BIRKEBAK IGO BOSAK VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye ATTEST I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of C:em Take on the date first written. Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk &rtif ieb (fillobu Date e-file: resolution\20Mno2004-09 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONTRACT COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE MONTHLY MEETING MAY 20, 2004 CITY OF SHOREVIEW — COUNCIL CHAMBERS ************8.00 A.M.************ 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Minutes of April 15, 2004 3. Approve Agenda 4. Insurance Update 5. 2005 Budget 6. Discussion Regarding Traffic Control 7. 1" Quarter Crime Statistics 8. 800 MHZ Update 9. Other Issues 10. Adj ournment MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE JURISDICTIONS THAT CONTRACT WITH RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR POLICE SERVICES MAY 20, 2004 The meeting was called to order at 8:07 a.m. The following members were present: ➢ George Altendorfer, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ➢ Roland Birkebak, City of Gem Lake ➢ Joel Hanson, City of Little Canada ➢ Jan Reagan, White Bear Township ➢ Mike Salter, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ➢ Terry Schwerm, City of Shoreview ➢ Bill Short, White Bear Township ➢ Gerry Urban, City of Vadnais Heights ➢ Michelle Wolfe, City of Arden Hills APPROVAL OF MINUTES The amended Minutes of April 15, 2004, were approved as submitted. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as submitted. INSURANCE UPDATE Altendorfer reported that the 2004 auto insurance, worker's compensation and liability insurance rates were underestimated by $14,000.00, and that he will try to compensate for this amount within the existing budget. He stated that he will inquire why there was an increase, and report at the next meeting. 2005 BUDGET Schwerm stated that he will keep this item on the agenda until the middle of the summer when it will be given formal approval. It was noted that Crime Prevention needs modification. Altendorfer stated that it will be incorporated into the budget. DISCUSSION REGARDING TRAFFIC CONTROL There was general discussion with regard to the "Unweave the Weave Project", `� and the additional traffic it is expected to bring to streets in the Contract Group w Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting May 20, 2004 communities (i.e., Highways 61 & 96, Rice Street, Lexington, Hamline, Labore, Edgerton, Centerville Road, County Road E). It was noted that the "Unweave the Weave Project" and related 1-694 improvements could last for up to ten years. There was concern stated with regard to any other streets within the Contract Group's communities that are scheduled for construction and the impact this may have during the freeway construction period. Schwerm stated concern that local roads are not designed to handle the extra traffic, i.e., they may not have the correct traffic controls at intersections. He noted that people may take more chances and more accidents may occur. Urban stated that he thought it may be best to hire an additional traffic person during the 3 p.m. — 7 p.m. time period during the week, while the project is underway, noting that he was not concerned about the weekends. He stated his idea that the Contract Group is probably not far from adding more traffic deputy time anyway (noon — 8 p.m.). He noted that there will probably be year-round traffic delays, and that the Group needs to prepare for it in their budgets. He stated that he felt that it may be more cost effective to hire retired deputies, rather than paying overtime. Schwerm inquired about the Union Contract restrictions, and pension regulations. AltendorFer answered that he believed that the number is between $11,000 - $12,000 before pensions are impacted. He stated that there has not been previous conflict regarding the use of part-time specialized staff. Salter noted that the Sheriff's Department has a long tradition of hiring part-time people. It was noted that Kim Klawitter, a retired state patrol officer, who has experience in freeway issues, may be available for traffic control, and that he has a different pension, with no salary limits. Hanson stated that he felt that this could be a way to "phase in" a second traffic car. He reported that he is also concerned about weekends, noting that residents will be home and will expect response. He stated that he believes it would be a good time to discuss a part-time position and also to talk about full- time. Schwerm thought that it would be good to budget the money now, so there is not a huge increase next year. He felt that the Group should discuss the interest level and the appropriate cost share. Hanson noted that his city will probably have to assume a higher burden as far as the "Unweave the Weave Project", but that he expects a normal share after that. 2 Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting May 20, 2004 There was discussion with regard to the cost to add another full-time dedicated traffic person, which is estimated at approximately $100,000.00. Altendorfer stated that they could start with a used vehicle, than buy a new car in a couple of years. Schwerm stated that he keep this matter on future agendas to look into the options. Altendorfer will put together cost estimates, using a new vehicle and a used vehicle, and he will also explore the part-time option. FIRST QUARTER CRIME STATISTICS Salter distributed the First Quarter Crime Statistics. There was nothing significant to report. Altendorfer stated that have been no recent major incidents. Hanson reported that his City Council wants to purchase a portable speed board as soon as possible, and he asked if any other communities were interested in purchasing them together for a volume discount. It was reported that there may be a pole available, with electrical adapters, so the boards can be easily attached by one person. Salter reported that he will oversee a mock disaster drill that will take place next Saturday in Shoreview, near County Road E and the freeway. He explained that the emergency drill, which is organized through a railroad company, will simulate major chemical concerns associated with the railroad. He reported that terrorists and snipers have also been added to the drill. He stated that 30 different agencies will participate, and citizen civil defense volunteers will be activated, and a simulated neighborhood evacuation will take place. He stated that the adjacent neighbors have been advised of the event. 800 MHZ -UPDATE Altendorfer stated that the decision with regard to the communication centers should be know by next month. OTHER ISSUES Salter reported on the recent tobacco compliance checks, noting that three businesses failed in Shoreview, and two failed in Little Canada. Altendorfer reported on implementation of the new deputy beginning the first week in June. He stated that the afternoon deputy will now work from 4:00 p.m. — midnight, and the midnight deputy from 11:00 p.m. — 7:00 a.m. He stated that there will be overlapping coverage for this shift change. He stated that the day shift will begin at 7:00 a.m. and end at 3:00 p.m. Minutes Sheriff Contract Group Meeting May 20, 2004 Schwerm reported that beginning in June, the Lake Johanna Fire Department will respond to all personal injury accidents. Urban distributed a copy of the Vadnais Heights Ordinance declaring clandestine drug labs to be a public nuisance and providing for their removal and clean-up, and assessing the costs against the property owner. He noted that last year three meth labs were found in Vadnais Heights. Wolfe inquired about the billing methods used by Gopher State One, noting that her city has been charged for locates that are not close to their borders. Hanson reported that Gopher State One has changed their policy on how they charge communities, and that that it will take a coordinated effort to change it. Urban stated that he did not think that a community should pay for locates that do not occur within their boundary. Hanson reported on a Retailers Protection Association presentation he attended regarding a criminal diversion program for worthless checks. He explained that if a city or law enforcement agency participates in the diversion program, a merchant or resident who receives a worthless check, and contacts law enforcement, will be directed to the Retailers Protection Agency, who will take the check report and begin the process of collecting restitution for the face value of the check and any bank fees. He reported that there is no charge to the city or the county to participate, and $5.00 from every check restitution received is donated to the city or law enforcement agency. Altendorfer stated that the Sheriff's Department does not see or process many cases related to this matter. He reported that he reviewed the program with the County Attorney a few years ago and they were not interested in it because they have their own diversion program. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:28 a.m. The next regular meeting will be held on JUNE 17, 2004, at 8:00 A.M. at the CITY OF SHOREVIEW COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Respectfully submitted, Jan Reagan Recording Secretary JAR/ 4 Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 05/24/2004 _I Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Roland Birkebak, Council Richard Bosak, Council Patrick Igo, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk t �ti1� : • ,,y,�t�i� (� ' ' ° u M.i0 DATE ��i DATE FCLA1M# PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM CLAIM47 SI' 2038 24-May Me liton Council Current User Charges: June 2004 SP 2039 24-May GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND TOTAL CLAIM _ S AMOUNT GENERAL FUND SEWER FUND 879.93 879'9' 7,651.65 t,500.00 2,654.00 71.40 SP 2039 24-May SP 2039, 24-May_ _ SP 2039 24-May SP 2039 24-May - SP 2039 24-May SP 2039 24-May SP 2039 24-May Gem Lake General Fund Gem Lake General Fund 50% Treasurer's Salary _ En 'neeri osts-Scheuneman Road Sewer g! --- _ - GopherStateOne-Call:Jan,Feb,Mar,Apr.Mey AsstClerkGSOne-CallTimeJan-Ma 1.40 hrs) %�--- - Administrator's Time: Jan. 2004 (5.25 hrs) - Gem Lake General Fund 70.00 Gem Lake General Fund 393.75 Gem Lake General Fund _ Gem Lake General Fund Administrator's Time: Feb, 2004(1.25 hra) Administrator's Time: Mar, 2004 (1.25 hrs) _ _ 93.7_5 93.75 - Lake General Fund Gem Lake General Fund Administrator's Time: Apr. 2004 (3.00 hrs) 225.00 2,043.75 SP 2039 24-May SP 2039 24-May 2039 24-May Gem _ General Fund Administrator's Time: May, 2004 (27.25 hrs) m Emeott Sewer Feasability/Scheuenan:6.75hrs - _ Gem Lake Gem Lake General Fund 506.25 SP GP 6411 24-May GP 6412 24-May _A GP 6412 24-May GP 6412 24-May GP 6413 24-May GP 64141 24-May GP 6414 24-May VOID VOID 0.00 ALLEN 0. ZEPPER Allen 0. - _ TOTAL CLAIM Plan Check for #132004-08 CommeraiallnspoctionforSinghEnterprires:Deli A ra Plan Check for #132004-09 _ _ 232.64 157.64 75.00 Allen O. Zepper Cindy Shilts 783.29 783.29 51.55 20.00 MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC TOTAL CLAIM TdConfW/Ramaet dcCi erkReThury(S98X.A 49.00 Meslow & Olson. PLLC 2.55 20.00 GP 6414 24-May GP 6415 24-May Meslow & Olson, PLLC CopieslnRetTo - _ Intergovemmenlal Mtg in February?004 Derek Wippicb - - 1,101.41 _ GP 6416 24-May GP 6416 24-May GP 6416 24-May GP 6417 24-May _ GP 6418 24-May GP 6419 24-May GP 6420 24-May CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE TOTAL CLAIM Fire & Paramedic: May 2004 _ Fire Marshall & Inspections: May 2004 _ Curbside ROcyclirlg:Mty 2004 83 Cityof White Bear Lake 47.58 247. Cityof White Bear Lake 281.30 281.30 E-Z Recycling, Inc. 59.80 59.80 Xcel Energy Ramsey County Jim Manteufel _ Street Li tin�April 2004 5,045.19 5,045.19 Law Enforcement: May 2004 - Commerciall ionforSin terpnses:Deli Ara. - -- - - 75.00 75.00 2,287.50 ) __ _ 6,436.00 �_ _ _ _ - GP G421 24-May _! GP 6421 24-May GP 6421 24-May GP 6421 24-May GP 6422 24-Mny GP 6422 24-May _I GP 6422 24-May GP 6422 24-May GP 6422 24 May GP 6422' 24-May GP 6423 24-May GP 6423 24-May GP 6423 24-May GP 6424 24-Mny GP 6425 24-May GP 6425 24-May GP 6425 24-May GP 6425 24-May GP 6426' 24-May GP 6426 24-May GP 64_6 24-May GP 6426 24-May _ GI' 6426 24-May 11 ro rd M , U-Mav LEONARD.OBRIEN,SpENCER.GAIX&.SA _ TOTAL CLAIM _ - - J Leonard,OBrien,Spertcer, Gale & Sayre_ MunieMtrs TdContRe SpecialUses - LeonaAOBrien Spencer. Gale & Sere XcelEnergyTransformerHaulRoute�M_pwdloinlPo . Leonard,OBrien,Spenoer. Gale & Sayre Hi llaryFarmIkwelopm- SEH, INC. TOTAL CLAIM - City En neeri Servicea:MismllarteouSExtra Svc SEH, Inc. y -' SEH, Inc. Hillary Farms Subdivision _ North Scheuneman Road Sewer SEH. Inc. - SEH. Inc.NPDES Related Services Big Fox/Little Fox Pavement Management SEH, Inc. 8 PRESS PUBLCATIONS TOTAL CLAIM 37.50 250.00 2,000.00ent 488.00 2,501.00 _ 2,6.00 61.00 61 732.00 535.50 Press Publications Le Tmns#292062:2003 Unaudited FinStatement 8 Leg llrans#292598:NoliCeofPublicHesring 8 IarTicke ]A5/tick +voiceonly@$7-25/ Reg" - - TOTAL CLAIM - Propcd (per $100 Coverege) 4/1/2004�/1/2005_ Municipal Liability Cove 4/1/2004-4/1/2005 Auto Liability & Phyaiwl Damage 4/1/04-4/1/OS TOTAL CLAIM - -_ - TeL Mar/Apr 2004 _ 0>�cesupplies,Copying&Postage: Mar/Apr-2004 Mikege:Apr/May-2004( ] 30 (u� $0.375 _ _ 1ntCmetAccess- 50% :Mar/A r-2003 ( ) LapTopCom tea50y6MonthlyPa eM 4.80 Press Publications 27.20 - 988,00 - _8 254.24 _ _ _ _ 35 35.70 27.20 � State One -Call !.LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST I League of MN Cities Insurance Trust League of MN Cities Insurance Trust League of MN Cities Insurance Trust 80.00 _ 836.00 72.00 124.52 MA_GNUSON & ASSOCIES AT. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson &Associates. LLC I_Magnuson & Associates. LLC -_ J Magnuson &_ Associates. LLC t Maenuson & Associates. LLC 152.77 48.95 11.95 _ _ - 50.00 Run Date & Time: 05/24/2004 at 04:43:24 PM File: 04claim05.123 r . ¢.. • - a.. Claims For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 05/24/2004 Paul Emeott, Mayor Chuck Watson, Council Roland Birkebak, Council Richard Bosak, Council Patrick Igo, Council Frederic Magnuson, Clerk Si natures A i iro%in • Claims for I'm anent Date Of Approval DATE DATE DATE A ' DATE I DATE DATE DATE GENERAL I SEWER CLAIM# I PAID PAID TO DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM S AMOUNT I FUND FUND GP 6426 24-M: GP 6426 24-M; GP 6426 24-Mi GP 6426 24-MI GP 6426 r 24-M, GP 6426 24-Mi GP 6426 24-Mi GP 6426 24-Mi GP 6426 24-M GP 6427 24-M; GP 64271 24-M' GP 6427 24-M GP 6427i 24-M GP 6427: 24-M GP 6428 24-M GP 6429 24-M ALL 0511' - ALL 05/1' s ALL 0511' j Maenuson &Associates. LLC Nssistantaerk.Apr/May-2004: 17.00 hours Lonino(!Tm, Apr/May-2004: 04.75 hours _ZoningAdminBillable,ApL/ a 2004: 01.25 hours GenemlAdmin, Apr/May-2004: 28.50 hours _ 850.001 y y Magnuson & Associates. LLC y Magnuson & Associates. LLC y Magnuson & Associates. LLC 356.25 93.75 2,137.50 y Magnuson & Associates. LLC GencralAdminBillable, Apr/May-2004: 16.50 hours SewerAdminft! Qp 004: 29.00 hours May-2 SewerAdminSC, Apr/May-2004: 06.00 hours ChiefElectiooJudge:ApdMay-2004: 00.50 hours 1,237.50 y MaMnuson & Associates. LLC 2,175.00 y 'y Magnuson & Associates. LLC Magnuson & Associates. LLC 300.00 22.50 ry Magnuson & Associates. LLC CodcEnforcement_:A_pdMay-2004: 09.25 hours TOTAL CLAIM 693.75 ry PAUL R. EMEOTT 1,426.25 Paul R. Emeott SewerFea"Wity/Schetlnemanitt 6.75 hours _ 506.25 ry Paul R. Emeott HillaryForm: 10 hours Hansen GBII: 2 hours 750.00 150.00 ty Paul R. Emeott iy Paul R. Emeott ty George Jun mann Intergovernmental Meeting 20.00 Spri 2t1$ 004: Street Sweeping 480.00 _ 40.00 $36,656.45 13.16% 1119,281,10 49.98% ($23,177.63 -8.32% 480.00 ty City Of White Bear Lake 2004 Ramsey County GIS Fees TOTAL FOR MAY % Annual Budget TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE % Annual Budget Annual Budget $Under/($Over) Annual Budget %Under/ -%Over 40.00 $28,124.87 10.09% 1107,110,99 46.86% ($11,869.32 _ -5.19% S8,531.: 3.06 132,120, 64.31 ($11,30K -22.64 '/2004 MAY SUMMARY 8.33% Of Budget Monthly 72004 YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY 41.67% Of Year Completed 1/2004 ` VERSUS ANNUAL BUDGET 1 41.67% Of Year Completed Run Date & Time: 05/24/2004 at 04:43:24 PM File: 04claim05.123 GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT Y OF GEM County Gem Lake, MN LAKE Road "E" 55110-5231 East GENERAL FUND CHECKING C H K I N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 01-Jan-04 START 45943.83 79047.60 45712.78 47,143.83 BANK BALANCE 39,%9.23 38,807.46 -79125.11 46021.34 -33103.77 DEBIT 6.99 (1.161. (100.00 1,101.41 (34.00 (22.00 (240.00 (2,300.00 CREDIT 47045.24 BALANCE 41,070.64 39,908 87 TRAM DATE TRAN # CHECKS TO DEPOSITS FROM Deluxe Business Systems/Business Products AEN O. ZEPPER LL Ramsey County League of Local CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL PRESS PUBLICATIONS Avenel, LLC Smith Schafer & Associates, Ltd. PAYMENT FOR General Fund Check Reorder TOTAL CLAIM 2004 RCLLG Membershi Dues TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM Twelve Months Hosting KebSite 4/1/04-3/31/01 FinStatemnisFoi2003/CompOthr FormsFOrFI 09-Apr.04 30•Apr-04 30-Apr-04 lecWith P6392 P6393 ['6394 GP6395 GP6396 39,W8.87 39,707.46 38,673.46 39.651.46 38,411.46 36,111.46 38,707.46 37 606.05 37,572 05 37,550.05 37,310.05 35 010.05 27-A r 04 27-Apr-04 28 Apo-04 27-A 04 P6397 22-A 04 P6398 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (789.00 (200.00 1,200.00 (413.12 (47.60 (60.55 (291.30 (5,045.19 (2,074.00 (475.00 5,867.60 (1,480.98 35,322.46 35,122.46 35,122.46 33,922.46 33,461.74 33.401.19 33,119.89 29,074.70 26,000.70 25,525.70 18.177.12 34.221.05 34,021.05 34,021.05 34,021.05 93 33,560.33 33.499.78 33,218.48 28,173.29 26,099.29 25,624.29 19,756.69 15-Apr-04 GP6399 St. Marys of the Lake School Friends of the Parks & Trails Willow Lane BI School INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Press Publications Xcel F Z Recycling, Inc. Ran-cy County SEH, INC. LEONARD,OBRIEN,SPENCER.GALE&S MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC PAUL R. EMEOTT WALLY HILKE leTowing Olson Construction State of Minnesota Sing Enterprhms, LLC Paragon Pool Pamela Docken KENNETH KIRCHOFF LARRY WEBER Robert Cartier Dale Swomley White Bear Lions Club MARK SWEET General Investment Funds Parks & Playgrounds Fund Premier Bank Charitable Gambling Donation - 2003 Charitable Gambling Donation - 2003 Charitable GamblingDonation - 2003 1ST QTR 2004 WITHHOLDING Leh Trans#291391: PublicNotice #2004-07 Street Lightin March 2004 Curbside Recycling: April 2004 Law Enforcement: Apr'12004 TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM TOTAL CLAIM TOTALCLAIM TOTAL PAYMENT Application for Interim Use Permit Buildin Permit #B2004-06 Traffic Fines: March 2004 2004 TobaCWReseHU4jdrnmSfToPrevi Building Permit #132004-05 Building Permit #B2004-07 TOTAL PAYMENT TOTAL PAYMENT Document Sales: Ordinance No. 43 Document Sales: Zoning Ordinances 1st Qtr 2004 Charitable Gembft TOTAL PAYMENT _ Reimburse Unbudgeted NPDES Dcvclo mant 0 ReimburwSidewalkPubm upn®Vadn!isHgts Interest Paid This Period 20-A -04 GP6400 19-Apr 04 P6401 26-Apr-04 P6402 23-A -04 GP6403 26-A -04 23-A -04 28-A -04 P6404 P6405 P6406 23-A -04 7 26 -04 GP6408 21-A -04 21-Apr-04 02_Apr-04 P6409 GP6410 1 2,911.48 150.00 125.70 82.00 250.00 586.55 127.50 543.43 2,755.64 11.80 56.25 764.00 543.53 18,177.12 21.088.60 21,238.60 21.364.30 21,446.30 21696.30 22,282.85 22.410.35 22.953.78 25,709.42 25,721.22 25.777.47 26,541.47 27,095.00 71 18197.19 21,187.19 21,337.19 21,462.99 21 544.89 21,794.89 22,391.44 22.508.94 23,052.37 25.809.01 25,919.91 02-Apr-04 2 0¢Apr-04 09•Apr-04 1 2 09-Apr-04 3 Ib A 04 1 qpr pq npr-04 30 -04 1 2 1 2 3 4 30-Apr-04 30.A -04 30-Apr704 25,876.06 26.640.06 27-183.59 30-Apr-04 20 -04 5 I 4 4 4 8,925.00 11,000.00 35.24 36,010.00 47,010.00 47,045.24 36,108.59 47.108.59 47,143.83 20-q -04 30 Aprv04 2 1 Run Date: 05/10/2004 at 10:33:07 AM E-File: PGFCheck04.123 Page 1 of 1 :z,I: Premier ■ 02 Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Page: 1 Account Number: 6005590 Statement Date: 4/30/04 Checks/Items Enclosed: 26 IMAGE STATEMENTS HAVE ARRIVED Premier Bank is pleased to present to you our new statement format. You will now find your information on both the front and back of the page. PREFERRED ELITE CITY OF GEM LAKE GENERAL FUND Beginning Balance 4/01/04 Deposits / Misc Credits 8 Withdrawals / Misc Debits 20 **:Ending Balance 4/30/04 Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 4/30/04 Interest Paid Year To Date Average Balance Average Collected Balance Mini mn= Balance Average Rate / Cycle Days Enclosures Miscellaneous Credits Date Deposits Withdrawals 4/02 3,061.48 4/09 457.70 4/16 586.55 4/20 8,925.00 4/20 11,000.00 4/23 670.93 4/30 4,131.22 4/30 35.24 40,230.92 28,868.12 21,955.21 47,143.83 .00 35.24 188.47 46,163 45,618 40,230 .94000 / 30 26 Activity Description DEPOSIT DEPOSIT DEPOSIT DEPOSIT DEPOSIT DEPOSIT DEPOSIT INTEREST EARNED 86 Act # 6005590 1 L=.l MUM "Ousm LENDER MEMBER FDIC CFF GF\/FRCP CIIIF PnR AnnfflnNAI 1NFnRMATInr' Page: 2 CITY OF GEM LAIKE Account Number: 6005590 Statement Date: 4/30/04 Miscellaneous Debits Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 4/08 76.99 DELUXE BUS SYS./BUS PRODS FREDRIC MAGNUSON Paid Checks * indicates skip in check numbers Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount 4/22 6381 0001 184.70 4/22 6398 2,300.00 4/23 4/28 6405 6406 281.30 5,045.19 4/30 6392*0001 1,161.77 4/15 4/20 6399 789.00 6400 200.00 4/23 6407 2,074.00 4/30 4/27 6393 0001 6394 0001 100.00 1,101.41 4/26 6402* 413.12 4/26 6408 475.00 "'27 6395 0001 34.00 4/23 6403 47.60 4/21 6409 5,867.60 28 6396 0001 22.00 4/26 6404 60.55 4/21 6410 1,480.98 4/27 6397 0001 240.00 Daily Balance Sunmwxy Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance 4/02 43,292.40 4/20 63,195.66 4/26 50,681.74 4/08 43,215.41 4/21 55,847.08 4/27 49,306.33 4/09 43,673.11 4/22 53,362.38 4/28 44,239.14 4/15 42,884.11 4/23 51,630.41 4/30 47,143.83 4/16 43,470.66 j SEWER FUND CHECKING 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE TREASURER'S REPORT Y OF GEM SEWER FUND C H 04 Jan START LAKE i County Road "E" East CHECKING K 28509-33 -23589.73 10224.90 33814.13 DEBTT CREDTT 28509..33 8509K BALANCE Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231 I N BANK BALANCE TRAN TRAN CHECKS TO DATE 9 DEPOSITS FROM PAYMENT FOR Current User Charges: M 2004 4 4 -879.93 -20000.00 45474.74 25474.74 45474.74 25474.74 23-A -04 SP2036 Me lilan Council 20-p -04 Sp2037 Premier Bank CD Investment 4/19/2004 4 30.00 25504.74 25504.74 09-Apr-04 1 Sandra Kuchenmeister 1st 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential � 630.00 26134.74 26134.74 09.Apr-04 2 ALLEN DRUMMOND TOTAL PAYMENT 4 4 30.00 26164.74 26164.74 09-A -04 3 Gertrude Hannah 4 Sewer F/Residential 1st Qtr 200Fees/Residential 60.00 26224.74 26224.74 09-Apr-04 4 Flanagan Prp LLC ist 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4 4 120.00 26344.74 26344.74 09-Apr-04 5 Rhino Linings 1 st Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial 30.00 26374.74 26374.74 16-A r-04 1 John Hurt 1st 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential 4 4 30.00 26404.74 26404.74 16 Apr 04 2 Knut 1 st Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential 30.00 26434.74 26434.74 16-A 04 3 David Hanson 1st 2004SewerFees/ResideMial 4 30.00 26464.74 26464.74 I&Apr 04 4 Peter Oswald 1st 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential 4 30.00 26494.74 26494.74 16-A {µ 5 John Birkeland 1st 2004SewerFees/Residential 4 34.00 26528.74 26528.74 16-Apr-04 6 TIM DRAINS TOTAL PAYMENT 1st 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential 4 4 30.00 150.00 26558.74 26708.74 26558.74 26708.74 16 A 04 7 Matt Flynn 16 -04 8 ARNCO INDUSTRIES. INC. TOTAL PAYMENT 1st 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4 4 4 180.00 120.00 26888.74 27008.74 26888.74 27008.74 16-Apr-04 9 Country Lounge. Inc. 16:Apr-04 l0 White Bear Floral 1st 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial 144.00 27152.74 27152.74 16-Apr-04 11 POD'S TIRE & WHEEL TOTAL PAYMENT 4 4 1080.00 28232.74 28232.74 16-Apr-04 12 Tousl Ford lst Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial 30.00 28262.74 28262.74 23-A 1 Ruth Luh l st Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential 4 30.00 28292.74 28292.74 2}A -04 2 Kou Vang 1st Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential 1st 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial 4 4 4 180.00 30.00 28472.74 28502.74 28472.74 28502.74 23-Apr 04 3 Cafe Cravin 1 Uoyd Lahore 1st Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential 6.59 28509.33 28509.33 30•A r-04 1 Premier Bank Interest Paid This Period 4 Run Date: 05/10/2004 at 10:50:18 AM E-File: PSFCheck04.123 Page 1 LrNO LENDER MEMBER FDIC NMIX Premier Bank Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated. CITY OF GEM LAKE SEWER FUND 1369 COUNTY ROAD E E GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231 Page: 1 Account Number: 6005582 Statement Date: 4/30/04 Checks/Items Enclosed: 6 86 IMAGE STATEMENTS HAVE ARRIVED Premier Bank is pleased to present to you our new statement format. You will now find your information on both the front and back of the page. PREMIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE SEWER FUND Beginning Balance 4/01/04 Deposits / Misc Credits 5 Withdrawals / Misc"Debits 2 ** Ending Balance 4/30/04 Service Charge Interest Paid Thru 4/30/04 Interest Paid Year To Date Average Balance Average Collected Balance Minimum Balance Average Rate / Cycle Days Enclosures miscellaneous Credits Act # 6005582 46,354.67 3,034.59 20,879.93 28,509.33 ** .00 6.59 28.90 40,434 40,096 28,472 .20000 / 30 6 Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description 4/09 870.00 DEPOSIT 4/16 1,888.00 DEPOSIT 4/23 240.00 DEPOSIT 4/30 30.00 DEPOSIT 4/30 6.59 INTEREST EARNED Paid Checks - * indicates skip in check numbers Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No. 4/23 2036 0001 879.93 4/20 2037 20,000.00 Amount CFF RF\/FRCP ginp r:np annITI()KIA1 IAIFf PKAATIr1KI Page: 2 ciTY OF GEM LAKE Account Number: 6005582 Statement Date: 4/30/04 Daily Balance Summary Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance 4/09 47,224.67 4/20 29,112.67 4/30 28,509.33 4/16 49,112.67 4/23 28,472.74 a