HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 11-08 CC PACKETN
caq2ies c&R
CITY OF GEM LAKE --
Monday CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 08 November 2004
CALL TO ORDER
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Emeott at .m.
ALL OF THE ROLL
MAYOR, 2002
CITY COUNCIL, 2002
CITY COUNCIL, 2002
CITY COUNCIL, 2004
CITY COUNCIL, 2004
Paul Emeott
Chuck Watson
Rick Bosak
Pat Igo
Rrollie Birkebak
CITY CLERK
TREASURER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY PROSECUTOR
SR. BUILDING OFFICIAL
Fritz Magnuson
Sarah Cobian
Tom Newcome III
Doug Meslow
Allen Zepper
OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE (Attach List)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES & AGENDA FOR
A) City Council Minutes for 18 October 2004
B) City Council Agenda For 08 November 2004
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS — 2�-
REPORTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
A) Osterkamp Interim Use No. 2004-03 Recommendation - Hoeschler
B) McNulty Variance No. 2004-02 Recommendation - Hoeschler AP'0
PUBLIC SAFETY
A) Codes - Magnuson
B) 800 Mhz Radios - WBL Fire Department
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
A) Scheuneman Road Sewer & Road - Emeott ✓�'
B) Sewer Insurance t
C) 2004-5 Snow Plowing (Schifsky Contract)_
D) Cooperative Agreement With Vadnais I lei--hts & Ramsey County .
Y%f S
NEW BUSINESS
ELECTION RESULTS v , ��(/ 3 r! r
A) Acceptance of Canvass Boards election results.
SUCCESSION OF AUTHORITY �TQG�t�C
A) Succession of authority, disaster mitigationResolution No. 2004-25 �b
INTERIM USE PERMIT NO.2004-03 Oste
VARIANCE NO. 2004-02 (McNulty) Er -
HILLARY FARM LETTER OF AGREEMENT: Building Permits Without Asphalt Road p
TREASURER'S REPORT
CURRENT MONTHS TREASURER'S REPORT
OTHER FINANCIAL BUSINESS
A) NEW ACCOUNTS ($572,815.00)
1) Capital Project Fund @ $ 545,857.85
2) Bond Reoavment Fund tw $ 26.957.15
FUTURE MEETINGS
A) CITY COUNCIL
l) SPECIAL MEETING: A Special Meeting of the City Council shall be scheduled'for / / and shall be duly
published in the next edition of the White Bear Press Legal Section. The purpose of the meeting will be to
2) The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held at 7:00 p.m. on 20 December 2004.
3) The next meeting is rejoeduled to / due to and is ordered published
in the appropriate ed'' olff� White Bear P/� i; gal Section.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion By. U . Second By LA !/!.0 Unanimous Vote & Emeott Approval at In.
Page 1 of
r
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MINUTES OF CANVASS BOARD
08 NOVEMBER 2004
The Election Canvass Board of the City of Gem Lake was convened by Mayor Emeott on Monday, 08 November
2004, at 7:00 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Council members Birkebak, Bosak,
Igo and Watson, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were Planning Commissioners Hoeschler and Lindner,
Gretchen and Dale Swomley, Jim McNulty, Rick Rosow as attorney for Mr. McNulty, and Brian Harjes of Mr.
McNulty's design team.
The results of the General Election held on Tuesday, 02 November 2004, were presented by Magnuson.and are
attached hereto. Motion by Watson and Second by Igo to accept and certify the results of the General Election as
presented were unanimously approved.
There being no further business, Motion by Birkebak, Second by Bosak to adjourn at 7:06 PM was unanimously
approved.
AUTHORED: 09 November 2004
APPROVED: 20 December 2004
ATTEST:
Prederi M uson
Chief Electio is ,c
ATTEST:
Paul R. Emeott
Mayor
efile: election\2004GeneralElection/CanvassBoardMinutes.wpd
i
Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443
911W wn City C/eilr
Mr. Tim Vadnais, Chief
WHITE BEAR FIE & RESCUE
4700 Miller Avenue
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
REF: 800 mhz radio purchase
Dear Tim,
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Office of the City Clerk
1369 County Road "E" East
Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231
Email: gemlakecity@aol.com
fnau/Cimeolf �%yoi
Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444
Cfoio%> Co/io4 `Tienr11"
29 October 2004
Pursuant to our discussions of 28/29 October 2004, the City of Gem Lake has ordered six (6) radios per the attached email which
was forwarded to Paul Kirkwold at PLK Consulting this morning. It is our understanding that your department will cover the costs
related to the radios that exceed the grant money (z $1,900 per radio) allocated to Gem Lake by Ramsey County.
Additionally and in the interest of public safety, we believe it is in the best interest of both our community and your agency that
two (2) radios be made available to Gem Lake for use at any time a national emergency, natural disaster or when other wide spread
disaster mitigation becomes necessary. Additionally, we believe similar consideration should apply to any disaster mitigation exercises
that would be performed.
With the presumption that you agree with the aforementioned, we ask that you sign and return one (1) copy of this correspondence
to us. Thanks in advance for your continued work on behalf of the residents of Gem Lake.
Regards,
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk
cc: Mayor & Council
Email to: 0kconsulting rr comcast.net
Paul,
Agreed In Principle,
WHITE BEAR LAKE FIRE & RESCUE
Tim Vadnais, Chief
etile: SafetyPrograms\800mhz\tvadnais041029A.wpd
Copy to: David.Twa0mco.ramsev.mn.us
John. Luey(a.co. Ramsey. MN . us
Tvadnais a,whitebearlake.orp
Gem Lake City Council
The City of Gem Lake intends to purchase 6 radios under the 800 mhz plan. The radios we will require will be set aside for use by the
W h ite Bear Lake Fire Department acting under a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Gem Lake. Hence, the radios will be to the
specifications established by Chief Tim Vadnais of the White Bear Lake Fire Department.
CITY OF GEM LAKE
0 #��
F. C. "Fritz" Magnuson
City Clerk
efile: Safe:yPrograms\800Mhz\o.kirkwold091029A.htm1
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
We, the undersigned Judges of Election and the legally constituted canvassing board of the City of Gem Lake, Ramsey
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that at the State General Election held in that City Of Gem Lake on Tuesday, 02 November
2004, between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, the following named persons received the number of votes set opposite their
respective names for the offices shown, to wit:
OFFICE OF MAYOR (2 Year Term)
VOTES RECEIVED
Paul R. Emeott (Incumbent) ELECTION WINNER-4
183
WRITE-INS VOTES (See Attached)
14
Undervote / Overvote
64
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST
261
OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL (4 Year Term)
VOTES RECEIVED
Hugh K. Schilling ELECTION WINNER-*
138
Thomas F. Rasmussen ELECTION WINNER4
162
WRITE-IN VOTES (See Attached)
8
Undervote / Overvote
135
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST
261
The following summary restates Write -In votes for local offices as shown on the ballot of General Election for 02 November
M04
MAYOR
# VOTES
CITY COUNCIL
# VOTES
Mike Bialke
1
SounderAndrews
1
Dan Meier
l
Gretchen Swomley
1
Timothy Woller
1
Lloyd Labore
I
Dan Marier
1
Jerry Thompson
1
Pat Igo
2
Ken Lorenz
1
Jim Lindner
3
Jodi Lorenz
1
Rich Pientka
1
Diane Sweet
I
Ken Lorenz
1
Mike Bialke
I
Bryce Menk
1
Derek Wippich
1
Other (As non-residents or unqualified)
0
Other (As non-residents or unqualified)
0
TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST
12
TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST
9
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
OFFICE & CANDIDATE
VOTES
PRESIDENT & VICE PRESIDENT
Cheney & Bush
132
Kerry & Edwards
128
Cobb & Lamarche
0
Van Auken & Lawrence
0
Calero & Hawkins
0
Harens & Ryan
0
Nader & Camejo
I
Perolltka & Baldwin
0
Badnarik & Campagne
0
US REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 4
Peter F. Vento
20
Patrice Bataglia
109
Betty McCollum
122
STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 54B
Ryan Griffin
121
Bev Scalze
124
COUNTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT 1
Tony L. Bennett
167
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 2
Gwen Williams
78
Dorothy Waltz
69
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 3
Marj Ebensteiner
52
Jill E. Wilkinson
93
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 5
Joseph L. For
145
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE 6, SUPREME COURT
Alan C. Page
141
Tim Tingelstad
52
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE 5, SUPREME COURT
Sam Hanson
126
JUDGE 3, COURT OF APPEALS
Paul Elliott Ross
61
David Minge
102
.IUDGE 14, COURT OF APPEALS
R. A. (Jim) Randall
87
Daniel L. Griffith
69
.IUDGE 2, COURT OF APPEALS
Natalie E. Hudson
126
JUDGE 4. COURT OF APPEALS
Wlihelmina Wright
125
.IUDGE 13, COURT OF APPEALS
Randolph W. Peterson
125
JUDGE 14, COURT OF APPEALS
Michael F. Fetsch
69
Patricia M. Sifferle
77
JUDGE 1, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
Edward J. Cleary
124
OFFICE & CANDIDATE
VOTES
JUDGE 3, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
George Stephenson
119
JUDGE 4, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Rosanne Nathanson
122
JUDGE 8, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Steven D. Wheeler
118
JUDGE 9, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Paulette Flynn
121
JUDGE 10, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Kathleen R. Gearin
122
JUDGE 13, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
Marybeth Dorn
120
JUDGE 16, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
M. Michael Monahan
119
JUDGE 18, 2"D DISTRICT COURT
David C. Higgs
118
JUDGE 20, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
Salvador M. Ross
114
JUDGE 23, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
JoanneM. Smith
116
JUDGE 25, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
Judith M. Tilsen
117
JUDGE 26, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
A. James Dickinson
1 19
JUDGE 27, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
William H. Leary
117
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
SUMMARY OF ELECTION DAY STATISTICS
Number of voters registered and on the polling place roster at 7:00 am
266
Number of new voter registration cards filled out on election day (yellow receipts)
40
Number of preregistered voters signing the roster (blue receipts)
205
Number of accepted regular absentee ballots (envelopes with black ink)
16
Number of accepted overseas/military absentee ballots (envelopes with red ink)
0
Number of accepted Presidential Absentee Ballots (envelopes with blue ink)
0
TOTAL VOTING IN THIS STATE GENERAL ELECTION
261
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
ELECTION JUDGE & CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL
GENERAL ELECTION, 02 NOVEMBER 2004
ELECTION JUDGE APPROVAL
We, the duly appointed and sworn undersigned Judges Of Election, do hereby certify that all City Ballots cast in the State
General Election were carefully and properly tallied electronically as well as piled, checked and counted and that the number of
votes marked opposite the respective names of the candidates shows the number of votes so cast and the ballots cast and related
reports of election activity have been securely stored at Ramsey County election headquarters. The American and Minnesota Flags
were displayed on suitable staffs in and outside (American Flag only) the polls during the hours of voting from 7:00 am through
8.00 Pill.
ATTEST
OFFICIALS NAME
OFFICIALS TITLE
SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL
Molly M. Bonin
Chief Election Judge
1Cristina M. Swanson
Election Judge
Dawn R. Segennark
Election Judge
Gabrielle C. Blake
Election Judge
Hilary R. Magnuson
Election Judge
CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL
We, the undersigned Canvass Board and Mayor of the City of Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota, having convened on
08 November 2004, do hereby certify that the results of an election held in that City Of Gem Lake on 02 November 2004 as
presented herein are a true and accurate representation of the ballots cast at said election and that those persons elected for the
ff h h Il b installed in said offices at the first meetin of the Ci Council of the City of Gem Lake in January, 2003.
o ices s own s a e
OFFICIALS NAME
OFFICIALS TITLE
SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL
Paul Emeott
Mayor
Patrick Igo
Canvass Board
Roland Birkebak
Canvass Board
Charles Watson
Canvass Board
Richard Bosak
Canvass Board
ATTEST
1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do
herebv certifv that the foreRoinQ is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Gem Lake
actin" in their capacity as the Election Canvass Board and duly convened on Monday, the 8"' day of November 2004.
G'?��c - . �.�4�1Z 08 .�I?lPin .�00�
Dated At Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55110
08 November 2004
Certif ieb (ILIL'0�g
e-file: Election\2004\GeneralElection\ElectionSummary.wpd
e-file: Election\2004\GeneralElection\ElectionSummary.pdf
CITY OF GEM LAKE
RESOLUTION NO.2004-25
08 NOVEMBER 2004
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ORDER OF SUCCESSION IN THE EVENT
THE MAYOR AND HIS SUCCESSORS ARE UNABLE OR UNAVAILABLE TO
SERVE IN THE CAPACITY OF THE OFFICE TO WHICH THEY WERE
ELECTED OR THE OFFICE TO WHICH THEY SUCCEEDED.
WHEREAS, all cities in the United States are required to establish a Disaster Mitigation Plan to address matters of public safety
in the event of natural or other disasters; and
WHEREAS, City policy has historically required appointment of an Acting Mayor at the first meeting in January of each calendar
year with said appointee to fill in for the Mayor in his or her absence; and
WHEREAS, the need for succession has been expanded by the development of a Disaster Mitigation Plan jointly with Ramsey
County who has requested such delineation of succession of authority.
RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby declare the following Order Of Succession For The
Office Of Mayor in the event the City's Disaster Mitigation Plan requires implementation of one or mor3e of those in succession
are unable to serve:
MAYOR
ACTING MAYOR (Appointed annually in January by Resolution)
SENIOR CITY COUNCILOR (based first upon tenure in office and second by ascending alphabetical spelling of last
name, first name, middle name and then ascending date of birth)
CITY CLERK
and, be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, Law Enforcement services as provided under periodically renewable contract by the Ramsey County
Sheriff thus recognizing and implementing it's established Order Of Succession Of Authority Plan; and, be it
\ FURTHER RESOLVED, Fire and Paramedic services as provided under periodically renewable contract by the City of White
Bear Lake thus recognizing and implementing it's established Order Of Succession Of Authority Plan.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by City Councilor name and was supported by City Councilor name and was
declared adopted/failed based upon the following vote:
NAME EMEOTT WATSON BIRKEBAK IGO BOSAK
VOTE
ATTEST
I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City
of C;em Lake on the date first written.
Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk
Certifiieb (ful,0h11
Date
e-file: reso1ution\2004\no2004-25
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Office of the City Clerk
1369 County Road "E" East
Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231
Telephone: ( 651 ) 426 - 6443 Email: gemlakeeity@aol.com Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444
fz 5%% 1.11n, C4 C/6( 9)"I m"ll [Je�o1 ak6 w. ciQdLsvmi
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
HILLARY FARM
BITUMINOUS ROAD WORK vs. BUILDING PERMITS
The City of Gem Lake and Hillary Farm, LLC as Owner/Developer have entered into a Developer's
Agreement dated 23 August 2004 for the development of property to be platted as Hillary Farm in the City
of Gem Lake. The Developer's Agreement provides in part that the private drive shall be improved
consistent with the requirements and pursuant to the timetable set by the City Engineer provided the final
wear course shall be completed in the Spring/Summer following one freeze/thaw cycle after underground
utilities are accepted by the City. City Code Section 14.1.1 provides in part: "...that the subdivider will
start no private construction on the lands within said plat, nor will the subdivider file or cause to be filed
any application for buildingpermits for such construction until all improvements required by this Ordinance
have been made or arranged for in the manner and conforming to the requirements set forth on the Final
Plat. " While it may still be possible to place the first course of bituminous down during 2004, weather
i conditions may prevent this. We request that the time table for completing the first course of bituminous
asphalt for the private drive be extended to the Spring of 2005 but no later than June 30, 2005. Except as
modified in this Letter Agreement, the Developer's Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Please
sign a copy of this letter to indicate your agreement.
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
HILLARY FARM, LLC
R. James McNulty, Jr., Its Chief Manager
ACCEPTED BY:
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Paul R. Emeott, It's Mayor
Frederic C. Magnuson, It's City Clerk
Dated
Dated
Dated
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
(� We, the undersigned Judges of Election and the legally constituted canvassing board of the City of Gem Lake,
1 Ramsey County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that at the State General Election held in that City Of Gem Lake on
Tuesday, 02 November 2004, between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, the following named persons received the
number of votes set opposite their respective names for the offices shown, to wit:
OFFICE OF MAYOR (2 Year Term)
VOTES RECEIVED
Paul R. Emeott (Incumbent) ELECTION WINNER4
183
WRITE-INS VOTES (See Attached)
14
Undervote / Overvote
64
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST
261
OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL (4 Year Term)
VOTES RECEIVED
Hugh K. Schilling ELECTION WINNER—>
138
Thomas F. Rasmussen ELECTION WINNER-+
162
WRITE-IN VOTES (See Attached)
8
Undervote / Overvote
135
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST
261
The following summary restates Write -In votes for local offices as shown on the ballot of General Election for 02
November 2004
MAYOR
# VOTES
CITY COUNCIL
# VOTES
Mike Bialke
1
SounderAndrews
I
Dan Meier
1
Gretchen Swomley
I
Timothy Woller
1
Lloyd Labore
I
Dan Marier
1
Jerry Thompson
I
Pat Igo
2
Ken Lorenz
I
Jim Lindner
3
Jodi Lorenz
I
Rich Pientka
1
Diane Sweet
I
Ken Lorenz
1
Mike Bialke
I
Bryce Menk
1
Derek Wippich
I
Other (As non-residents or unqualified)
0
Other (As non-residents or unqualified)
0
TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST
12
TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST
9
Page 1 of 4
r
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
OFFICE & CANDIDATE
VOTES
PRESIDENT & VICE PRESIDENT
Cheney & Bush
132
Kerry & Edwards
128
Cobb & Lamarche
0
Van Auken & Lawrence
0
Calero & Hawkins
0
Harens & Ryan
0
Nader & Camejo
I
Perontka & Baldwin
0
Badnarik & Campagne
0
US REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 4
Peter F. Vento
20
Patrice Bataglia
109
Betty McCollum
122
STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 54B
Ryan Griffin
121
Bev Scalze
124
COUNTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT 1
Tony L- Bennett
167
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 2
Gwen Williams
78
Dorothy Waltz
69
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 3
Marj Ebensteiner
52
Jill E. Wilkinson
93
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 5
Joseph L.Fox
145
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE 6, SUPREME COURT
Alan C. Page
141
Tim Tingelstad
52
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE 5, SUPREME COURT
Sam Hanson
126
JUDGE 3, COURT OF APPEALS
Paul Elliott Ross
61
David Minge
102
JUDGE 14, COURT OF APPEALS
R. A. (Jim) Randall
87
Daniel L. Griffith
69
.IUDGE 2, COURT OF APPEALS
Natalie E. Hudson
126
JUDGE 4, COURT OF APPEALS
Wlihelmina Wright
125
.IUDGE 13, COURT OF APPEALS
Randolph W. Peterson
125
.IUDGE 14, COURT OF APPEALS
Michael F. Fetsch
69
Patricia M. Sifferle
77
JUDGE I. 2"" DISTRICT COURT
Edward J Cleary
124
OFFICE & CANDIDATE
VOTES
JUDGE 3, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
George Stephenson
119
JUDGE 4, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Rosanne Nathanson
122
JUDGE 8, 2"D DISTRICT COURT
Steven D. Wheeler
118
JUDGE 9, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
Paulette Flynn
121
JUDGE 10, 2"D DISTRICT COURT
Kathleen R. Gearin
122
JUDGE 13, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
Marybeth Dorn
120
JUDGE 16, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
M. Michael Monahan
119
JUDGE 18, 2m'DISTRICT COURT
David C. Higgs
118
JUDGE 20, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
Salvador M. Ross
114
JUDGE 23, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
JoanneM. Smith
116
JUDGE 25, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
Judith M. Tilsen
117
JUDGE 26, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
A. James Dickinson
119
JUDGE 27, 2"" DISTRICT COURT
I
William H. Leary
"I
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
SUMMARY OF ELECTION DAY STATISTICS
Number of voters registered and on the polling place roster at 7:00 am
266
Number of new voter registration cards filled out on election day (yellow receipts)
40
Number of preregistered voters signing the roster (blue receipts)
205
Number of accepted regular absentee ballots (envelopes with black ink)
16
Number of accepted overseas/military absentee ballots (envelopes with red ink)
0
Number of accepted Presidential Absentee Ballots (envelopes with blue ink)
0
TOTAL VOTING IN THIS STATE GENERAL ELECTION
261
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
ELECTION JUDGE & CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL
GENERAL ELECTION, 02 NOVEMBER 2004
`r ELECTION JUDGE APPROVAL
We, the duly appointed and sworn undersigned Judges Of Election, do hereby certify that all City Ballots cast in the
State General Election were carefully and properly tallied electronically as well as piled, checked and counted and that
the number of votes marked opposite the respective names of the candidates shows the number of votes so cast and the
ballots cast and related reports of election activity have been securely stored at Ramsey County election headquarters.
The American and Minnesota Flags were displayed on suitable staffs in and outside (American Flag only) the polls
durino the hours of voting from 7:00 am through 8:00 pm.
ATTEST
OFFICIALS NAME
OFFICIALS TITLE
SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL
Molly M. Bonin
Chief Election Judge
Kristina M. Swanson
Election Judge
Dawn R. Segermark
Election Judge
Gabrielle C. Blake
Election Judge
Hilary R. Magnuson
Election Judge
CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL
We, the undersigned Canvass Board and Mayor of the City of Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota, having
convened on 08 November 2004, do hereby certify that the results of an election held in that City Of Gem Lake on 02
November 2004 as presented herein are a true and accurate representation of the ballots cast at said election and that
those persons elected for the offices shown shall be installed in said offices at the first meeting of the City Council of
the C'itx of C prn i nke. in January 2003.
OFFICIALS NAME
OFFICIALS TITLE
SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL
Paul Emeott
Mayor
Patrick Igo
Canvass Board
Roland Birkebak
Canvass Board
Charles Watson
Canvass Board
Richard Bosak
Canvass Board
ATTEST
1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council
of the City of Gem Lake acting in their capacity as the Election Canvass Board and duly convened on Monday, the 8"'
dqx nfNrnie1nher?004
Dated At Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55110
08 November 2004
Certifiieb (E4B
e-file: Election\2004\GeneralElection\ElectionSummary.wpd
e-file: Election\2004\GeneralElection\ElectionSummary.pdf
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER, 2004
The November, 2004 regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor
Emeott on Monday, 08 November 2004, at 7:07 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott,
Councilors Igo, Birkebak, Bosak and Watson, and Clerk Magnuson were present. Also present were Planning
Commissioners Hoeschler and Lindner, Gretchen and Dale Swomley, Jim McNulty, Rick Rosow as attorney for Mr.
McNulty, and Brian Harjes of Mr. McNulty's design team.
Following Mayor Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections, the following actions were taken: 1)
unanimous approval of the Minutes for the 18 October 2004 City Council meeting as presented on Motion by Igo,
Second by Watson; 2) unanimous approval of the City Council Meeting Agenda as amended for 08 November 2004 on
Motion by Bosak, Second by Birkebak.
Magnuson then presented General Announcements.
Mr. Hoeschler then presented the report of the Planning Commission which is attached as a memo from Mr.
Hoeschler to Mayor Emeott. Hoeschler stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of an Interim Use Permit
for Dan Osterkamp as the new owner of Summit Mini Storage to allow storage of Nelson Marine inventory on the south
portion of the Summit Mini Storage property until 31 December 2005. Hoeschler stated the Planning Commission
recommended denial of Mr. McNulty's application for a variance from the Zoning Ordinance R-1 building height
requirements and that an alternative solution would be worked out in the next two meetings.
Magnuson reported on Thury prosecution and also reported on Meslow's synopsis of civil action involved in the
clean-up.
Magnuson then reported that he and Mayor Emeott had made a decision to order six (6) 800 Mhz radios to White
Bear Lake Fire Department specifications. The radios will be purchased using Gem Lake's grant of approximately
$2,000 per radio and additional cash to specification. Upon receipt, the radios will be sold to the White Bear Lake Fire
l Department who will pay to Gem Lake the additional costs not covered by the Gem Lake grant. IN the event of a
national or natural disaster or preparedness drill for same, two (2) radios will be made available to specified personnel
in Gem Lake for the event.
Mayor Emeott reported that the Scheuneman Road project is about one week behind and there is still a possibility
of laying asphalt this fall.
Magnuson reported on No -Fault Sewer Liability Insurance stating it will become available through LMCIT once
a maintenance protocol has been developed and implemented. The LMCIT rates are very favorable.
Magnuson reported on negotiations with T.A. Schifsky and Sons for 2004-5 snow plowing, citing rates of $115/hour
for large truck with wing plow, $90/hour for sanding vehicle and $23.50 per ton for salt/sand. Magnuson recommended
approval of the contract and noted that Mr. McNulty was also considering Schifsky's services for Hillary Farm.
Magnuson reported the Cooperative Agreement for reconstruction of the County Road E and Highway 61
intersection by and between Gem Lake, Vadnais Heights and Ramsey County has been approved by both the other
bodies and the project will move forward with the design phase. Probable construction will commence in July, 2005.
Motion by Igo, Second by Watson to accept the report of the Election Canvass Board was unanimously approved.
Motion by Watson, Second by Igo to adopt Resolution No. 2004-25 providing for succession of authority beyond
the Acting Mayor in the event of a national or natural disaster or drill was unanimously approved.
Motion by Bosak, Second by Igo to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to approve
issuance of Interim Use Permit No. 2004-03 to Dan Osterkamp, d/b/a Summit Mini Storage, was unanimously approved.
Motion by Watson, Second by Birkebak to accept the recommendation of the Planning Cotrunission and to deny
Mr. McNulty's application for a development wide variance. Following discussion and presentations by Mr. Rosow, Mr.
McNulty and Mr. Har jes, Mr. Rosow on behalf of Mr. McNulty withdrew the application for the variance from the R-1
height restrictions of Ordinance No. 43. Mr. Watson then withdrew his motion. Dr. Birkebak allowed his second to stand.
Motion by Igo, Second by Watson to approve execution by the Mayor and City Clerk of a Letter of Agreement that
would allow Mr. McNulty to apply for and receive building permits prior to installation of the Hillary Farm private way
asphalt due to weather delays was unanimously approved. It was stated that this did not provide for issuance of
Occupancy Permits prior to installation of the asphalt.
Motion by Birkebak, Second by Bosak to empower the City Clerk to execute a snow plowing contract with T.A.
Schifsky and Sons, Inc. For the 2004-5 season was unanimously approved.
Motion by Watson, Second by Bosak to empower the City Clerk to instruct Prosecutor Meslow to commence civil
proceedings against Thury for the clean-up of the violations on his property with the understanding that costs would be
in the $2,500 to $10,000 range and that we should seek reimbursement of said costs as part of the clean-up was
unanimously approved.
Motion by Igo, Second by Birkebak to accept the November Treasurer's Report as prepared by Cobian and
indicating a balance in the General Fund of $26,292.26 and in the Sewer Fund of$39,417.94 was unanimously approved.
Mrs. Artib Swomley was recognized and she asked if any building permits have been issued to Hillary Farms as
of this time. Magnuson replied that a permit for the model home has been issued.
The next meeting of the Gem Lake City Council is scheduled for 20 December 2004. There being no further
business, Motion by Birkebak, Second by Bosak to adjourn was unanimously approved at 8:17 PM..
AUTHORED: 09 November 2004
APPROVED: 20 December 2004
ATTEST:` p
Frederic C. 6_-tZin
City Clerk
ATTEST:
-_�
Paul R. Emeott
Mayor
efile: min utes/2004/174novm2004.,Apd
Telephone: ( 651) 426 - 6443
Mobile: ( 612) 812 — 6139
6* a�d
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Office of the City Clerk
1369 County Road "E" East
Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231
/&W'11ea ' 144W
PUBLIC NOTICE NO.2004-29
DATE: 30 September 2004
FROM: Fritz Magnuson, City Clerk
TO: Press Publications, Legal Publications @ legals(bsherbtel.net
RE: Legal Notice To Be Published
To Whom It May Concern,
Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 — 6444
Email: GemLakeCity@aol.com
The following Legal (Public) Notice is to be published in the Legal Notices Section of the 03 November 2004
edition of the White Bear Press. Please confirm receipt and verify content is in acceptable form for use.
CITY OF GEM LAKE
PUBLIC NOTICE NO.29
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF MEETING
The Gem Lake City Council meeting regularly scheduled for Monday,
15 November 2004 has been rescheduled to 7:00 PM on Monday, 08
November 2004, in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford located at
1493 East County Road E in the City of Gem Lake.
Ss//Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk
CITY OF GEM LAKE
RESOLUTION NO.2004-25
08 NOVEMBER 2004
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ORDER OF SUCCESSION IN THE EVENT
THE MAYOR AND HIS SUCCESSORS ARE UNABLE OR UNAVAILABLE TO
SERVE IN THE CAPACITY OF THE OFFICE TO WHICH THEY WERE
ELECTED OR THE OFFICE TO WHICH THEY SUCCEEDED.
WHEREAS, all cities in the United States are required to establish a Disaster Mitigation Plan to address matters of public safety
in the event of natural or other disasters; and
WHEREAS, City policy has historically required appointment of an Acting Mayor at the first meeting in January of each calendar
year with said appointee to fill in for the Mayor in his or her absence; and
WHEREAS, the need for succession has been expanded by the development of a Disaster Mitigation Plan jointly with Ramsey
County who has requested such delineation of succession of authority.
RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gem Lake does hereby declare the following Order Of Succession For The
Office Of Mayor in the event the City's Disaster Mitigation Plan requires implementation of one or mor3e of those in succession
are unable to serve:
MAYOR
ACTING MAYOR (Appointed annually in January by Resolution)
SENIOR CITY COUNCILOR (based first upon tenure in office and second by ascending alphabetical spelling of last
name, first name, middle name and then ascending date of birth)
CITY CLERK
and, be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, Law Enforcement services as provided under periodically renewable contract by the Ramsey County
Sheriff thus recognizing and implementing it's established Order Of Succession Of Authority Plan; and, be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, Fire and Paramedic services as provided under periodically renewable contract by the City of White
Bear Lake thus recognizing and implementing it's established Order Of Succession Of Authority Plan.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by City Councilor Watson and was supported by City Councilor Igo and was
declared adopted based upon the following vote:
NAME
EMEOTT
WATSON
BIRKEBAK
IGO
BOSAK
VOTE
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
ATTEST
1, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City
of Gem Take on the date first written.
Frederic C. Magnuson, City Clerk
Certif ieb CoN
Date
Memo to Mayor Emeott
From: Jack Hoeschler
Date: October 20, 2004
Re: Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting of October 19, 2004
The Gem Lake Planning Commission held a continuation of its regular October meeting
on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at Tousley Ford. All members were present but Mr.
Becicka had to leave before action was taken any items. Messrs Magnuson, Emeott and
members of the public were also present. There were two public hearings on the agenda
and the following took place:
1) Ostercamp Request for an Interim Use Permit to Allow Outside Storage of
Boats.
Dan Ostercamp dba Summit Ministorage reported that he has purchased the
ministorage property on Scheuneman Road from Bryan Hansen and he has filed a request
with the appropriate fees and documentation to obtain an interim use permit to allow him
to provide outside storage of boats for Nelson Marine over the winter while he develops
plans to expand the building. Mr. Magnuson reported on the details of the request and
recommended approval. Mr. Ostercamp reported that he wants to construct and
expansion of the building to house his auto repair business next spring. He needs the
interim permit only in the meantime. Mr. Wippich moved and Ms. Robins seconded that
we recommend to the Council approval of an interim use permit allowing outside
storage of boats on the ministorage property for an initial period to end December
31, 2005, with annual reviews and renewals thereafter. The motion passed 4-0.
2) McNulty Request for Variance from 35 Foot Height Restrictions on All Lots in
Hillary Farm Addition.
Mr. Magnuson reported that Mr. McNulty has filed a request on September 26,
2004 (such that the sixty day period for consideration by the City ends November
26,2004) for a variance from the current 35' height restrictions for all lots in Hillary
Farm. Basically he is requesting that we amend the way we interpret the rule by
measuring the 35' from the midpoint of the foundation or bottom story to the midpoint of
the roof area. The specific request was more technically worded and more complicated
but the end result of adopting the requested wording would be to allow a walk -out fagade
in excess of 50'. Loren Gordon of HKGi planners described alternative methods of
measuring height used by various other communities and certain model building codes.
He also suggested another variation of the language they had discussed informally with
the Commission at its meeting earlier in the month.
Tim Nelson, one of Mr. McNulty's architects, spoke of the fact that the market wants
higher ceiling heights and 12/12 roof pitches with walk -outs. As a result, the current
style of high -end houses that the market would call for on large lots such as are planned
in Hillary Farm is simply bigger and higher than would be allowed by our current
ordinance. They are therefore requesting a variance or a change of interpretation so that
they will have more lattitude to design more interesting roof lines and more interesting
facades.
Comments from the public expressed concern about the size of some of the currently
popular houses as seen from Goose Lake or Scheuneman Roads. Of specific concern was
a plane three story fagade on a walk -out side with no relief from a deck or balcony. The
offensive size of some of the recent houses built in North Oaks and Grant Township was
cited. Problems with our current rule were also described, however, and there was more
than one suggestion that we could possibly modify that rule to the benefit of everyone.
Mr. Bryan Hansen expressed the concern that he has raised before than the outer edges of
the land could be better saved if a cluster zoning and design approach were used. the
public hearing was closed and the commission continued the discussion. The consensus
was that we had concerns about how big the new houses might be as they abut
Scheuneman Road and the lower and smaller houses on the other side of that road. We
were also concerned about the possibility that the houses built on Lots 6 and 7 might
overpower the lake area and detract from the up north, back woods quality of the lake.
Finally, we agreed with the concerns expressed by the public that the appearance of very
high houses abutting the golf course might be unfortunate when viewed from the north.
On the other hand, we were less concerned about the size of houses that were located
within the more wooded or interior lots. Generally we felt that the overall design of the
structures in the development should present a lower fagade along the outer edges of the
development but could move to higher structures within the development. In other
words, we should use a more sophisticated approach than a one size fits all measure.
The Chairman suggested that a PUD type approach might be better but Mr. McNulty
firmly rejected any loss of his design freedom. In response to a question he indicated
that the houses being designed for Lots 6 and 7 might present a lakeside fagade of over
50 feet. He indicated that adherence to our present rule would result in more ugly houses
than he would propose with a freer rule. Surprise was expressed that he might suggest
designing an ugly house. (The issue seemed to be how big is big enough; not whether
anything less than huge has to be ugly.) He indicated that the present rule might result in
more mansard style and other flat roofs.
Mr. Lindner cited sections 4.3.3, 4.2A, 4.213, and 5.2J of the comprehensive plan and
section 7.4(1) of the zoning code that sets a limit at 2.5 stories or 35feet. No one could
think of a reason that could overcome the hardship requirement of the ordinance and the
statute. There was a general concensus that we should look at both our ordinance
language and the design issues raised by the McNulty team in a general review of our
requirements. There was a desire to use something other than a blanket relaxation of our
current standards, however.
Upon the motion of Mr. Wippich and a second by Mr. Lindner is was unanimously
agreed that we should recommend denial of this specific variance request but that
we should make a general review of our height restriction system in light of the
issues raised. We then agreed to devote our next meeting on November 9 to a review of
the general issue of height restrictions with the goal of coming up with a more
sophisticated approach to the problem. We hope to be able to have a public hearing on
alternative language at our December meeting.
Pilenio to Mayor Emeott
From Jack Hoeschler. Chair of Gem Lake Planning Commission
Re: Planning Commission Meeting of November 9, 2004
Date: November 11, 2004
The Gem Lake Planning Commission held its regular November meeting on November 9, 2004 at
Tousley Ford. All members except Mr. Becicka were present along with Bryan Harjess representing the
Hillary Farm development, Mr. and Mrs. Swomley and Mrs. Tessier. Our sole topic of discussion was our
height restrictions and any possible modifications or clarifications in light of Mr. McNulty's request for a
blanket variance (which the Council was about to deny before it was withdrawn).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Three potential areas for clarification of intent and one possible change of interpretation/approach were
discussed.
The areas for possible clarification of intent are the following:
a) Section 3.2 re building height references "frontage on a public right-of-way." In light of the use of
private roads in Hillary Farm we might consider adding "or private" before the phrase "right-of-way
b) Section 3.2 does not take into account the possible very long driveways in Hillary Farm or in other R1
areas of the city. We might consider stating that the use of the mean curb level as a starting point would
only be used where the main structure is within a minimum distance (eg. 100 feet) from the right-of-way.
c) Section 7.5 contains a footnote to the table of dimensions for R-1 lots that says " All lots located on the
body of water called Gem Lake shall be considered as having two frontages; that portion of the lot that
abuts on the lake and such other lot line as determined by the City Council " We might consider adding
this footnote to the definition of building height as well to clarify the intent of the Council as expressed at
the meeting last night. This would likely be objected to by Mr. McNulty.
The area of possible change of interpretation/approach involves the way we measure and proscribe
building height. Mr. McNulty has asked us to use the mean roof elevation (and possibly the mean ground
elevation) to allow more latitude in roof design without an increase in the overall scale of the visible
structure. To achieve the latter and use the proposed mean measurement points, the 35 foot limit would
have to be reduced to something like 30 feet.
AMENDED LANGUAGE TO CONSIDER AT A PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 7, 2004
1) Amend the definition of Building Height in Section 3.2 to reference private as well as public right-of-
ways
2) Add to the definition of Building Height in Section 3.2 a reference to the fact that "All lots located on the
body of water called Gem Lake shall be considered as having two frontages; that portion of the lot that
abuts on the lake and such other lot line as determined by the City Council."
3) Add to the definition of Building Height in Section 3.2 a proviso that the mean curb level shall not be
used as a measuring point if the principal structure is more than x feet from the nearest curb.
4) .Amend the definition of Building Height in Section 3.2 to provide measurement of relevant heights from
other points of reference such as the mean ground elevation around the structure or the mean elevation
of the roof structure.
5) Such other amendments of the city codes as may be necessary to clarify the intent of the Council
regarding building heights in any district.
DETAILS REGARDING DISCUSSION AT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Our meeting was cordial and cooperative and Bryan was commended for his helpful involvement in the
discussion. We first considered and read the sections of the code that we thought were relevant The
first section we read was the definition of Building Height contained in Section 3.2:
"Building Height
A distance to be measured from the mean curb level along the front lot line or from the mean ground level
for all of that portion of the structure have frontage on a public right-of-way, whichever is higher, to the top
of the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the
highest wall of a shed roof, to the upper -most point on a round or other arch type roof, to the height f the
highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. "
We also reviewed the footnote to the dimension schedule regarding R-1 lots in Section 7.5 which states:
"All lots located on the body of water called Gem Lake shall be considered as having two frontages; that
portion of the lot which abuts on the lake and such other lot lines determined by the City Council."
We discussed the fact that some reasonable glosses could be put on the language to deal with the fact
that the Hillary Farm plat has private rather than public rights -of -way. We also discussed the use of the
front elevation ground level five feet from the foundation wall (ignoring any stoops or steps that may fall in
that area) as a possible short hand bottom reference point where the front yard is generally level. Finally,
we agreed that where the driveway is very long (eg over 100 or 150 feet) the curb measuring point should
be ignored lest it create mischief with a building site that is substantially higher or lower than the curb.
We noted to lot 7 as an example of that situation.
We identified the following lots as being of particular sensitivity in regard to height and building location
issues: 6, 7, 17, 22, & 24. These are designated as walkout structures and their highest fagades are
likely to be quite visible from off of the development. If buildings currently designated LO (lookout with
partially buried basement elevations) are changed to WO, those lots might give special concern as to
siting as well. We said that the design of the lot 7 house is of particular interest and a good test of these
rules We indicated that Jim's failure to show us the possible plans for that lot left us no conclusion other
than that that house will present a very high, exposed and objectionable fagade to the lake side of the lot.
We asked Bryan to ask Jim to show us the designs for that lot so that we could get some comfort that its
design will not push the absolute limits of our ordinance both in terms of height and in terms of siting.
In the course of our discussion of the two frontage provision, Bryan argued forcefully that the schedule in
Section 7.5 only refers to the location of lot fronts for determining minimum lot widths and the footnote
_ should have nothing to do with the height issue. We noted that the Council at its meeting last night
seemed to feel otherwise and that the city had always in the past regarded the lake frontage as the front
frontage of a house or lot. The effect of such a reading, of course, would be to limit the lake frontage of
lake lot houses to 35 feet instead of 45 or 47 feet if their lake frontages were considered to be rear
walkout frontages. From the reaction of Mr. Rossow at the Council meeting we should assume that Mr.
McNulty would object to any interpretation than would limit lake house frontage to 35 feet. Brian
confirmed this. Nevertheless, the issue is what the Council intended by its ordinance language taken as
a whole and whether a limit of 35 feet on lake front facades is reasonable under the circumstances.
We again urged Bryan to ask Jim to bring forth the drawings for lot 7 so that we could all have an
informed discussion. We indicated that a 45 foot fagade facing south onto the scenic easement would be
less problematic than such a high and prominent easement facing the lake. Also, the siting of the house
is also important. We had similar discussions regarding lot 6, the model lot 17, and lots 22 and 24. We
noted that we do not have the same controls regarding inland lots 17, 22 and 24 as we have on lake lots.
We also noted that we were less concerned about lake lots 2--5 since they do not front on the main lake
where they can be so intrusive but rather on the marsh and the islands beyond where they cannot be
seen by other houses.
We reviewed pictures of existing large houses around the lake (Hannaford and Daniels) and noted that
these do not violate the 35 foot rule and that they are well screened by vegetation. They exemplify the
reserved and environmentally sensitive design ethic that characterizes large homes in Gem Lake. They
represent the type of relatively minimal environmental impact that we hope to see in new houses. We
also reviewed pictures of large and bulking walkout facades on houses built in Grant Township and North
Oaks in recent years. We looked at those facades in the context of the view from the lake of lots 6 and 7
and expressed concern that the impact of such large and exposed facades would be bad for the
environment. This issue goes beyond mere aesthetics. We again asked to see what was being
contemplated for lot 7 to see whether that design exhibits the "good manners" toward the neighborhood
and the environment that we hope for and that we have heard Jim promise.
Various members of the Commission said that they thought the public versus private road issue is
irrelevant and the language should be changed to make this clear. They also agreed that at a certain
point of remove, the road elevation is or should also be irrelevant. The main question is where to start to
measure height from a point of close proximity (5 feet?) to the structure. Several members pointed out a
possible distinction between the front of the structure and frontage on the lake or the road. One member
recommended that we leave out the supplemental limit of 2.5 stories (which we had noted but not
discussed in great detail). One member suggested using a mean roof height upper measure but drop the
allowed footage from 35 to 30 to avoid a substantive change in fagade height while allowing more design
latitude for the roof. Another member saw a need to clarify frontage definition and to add the two front
reference for lake lots to the height definition so that prospective buyers or builders do not have to read
the code so closely to find all relevant rules. He also suggested that we consider using the mean
elevation of the ground around the entire structure as the bottom measuring point instead of the elevation
of the ground in the "front". Several members stated that they thought that a 35 foot absolute limit facing
the lake was very important. At the end of the day, it was agreed that the existing language was really
quite clear and that any changes could and should be relatively minor since the code expresses a clear
intent not to allow "big honkers" that some builders feel are necessary given smaller lots to start with.
Here we have 2.5 to 3 acre lots and plenty of room to spread out and hug the land rather than scrape the
sky. We repeated again our concern that we not spoil the environment of either the lake or the city as a
whole. We also agreed that if we were to change the method of measurement (e.g., use a Mean rather
than an absolute measurement point), we should apply those same rules to all districts, not just R-1 or
just Hillary Farm.
We agreed to collect our various detailed drafting thoughts within the next few days so that a detailed
notice of a public hearing on December 7 can be timely published.
Jack Hoeschler
JGHoeschler@comcast.net
John G. Hoeschler, P.A.
800 Lone Oak Road
Eagan, MN 55121
P:651-683-1868
F:651-681-6822
C: 651-324-1694
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
We, the undersigned Judges of Election and the legally constituted canvassing board of the City of Gem Lake,
l Ramsey County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that at the State General Election held in that City Of Gem Lake on
Tuesday, 02 November 2004, between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, the following named persons received the
number of votes set opposite their respective names for the offices shown, to wit:
OFFICE OF MAYOR (2 Year Term)
VOTES RECEIVED
Paul R. Emeott (Incumbent) ELECTION WINNER4
183
WRITE-INS VOTES (See Attached)
14
Undervote / Overvote
64
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST
261
OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL (4 Year Term)
VOTES RECEIVED
Hugh K. Schilling ELECTION WINNER4
138
Thomas F. Rasmussen ELECTION WINNER-4
162
WRITE-IN VOTES (See Attached)
8
Undervote / Overvote
135
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST
261
The following summary restates Write -In votes for local offices as shown on the ballot of General Election for 02
November 2004
MAYOR
# VOTES
CITY COUNCIL
# VOTES
Mike Bialke
1
SounderAndrews
I
Dan Meier
1
Gretchen Swomley
I
Timothy Woller
1
Lloyd Labore
I
Dan Marier
1
Jerry Thompson
I
Pat Igo
2
Ken Lorenz
I
Jim Lindner
3
Jodi Lorenz
I
Rich Pientka
I
Diane Sweet
I
Ken Lorenz
1
Mike Bialke
I
Bryce Menk
1
Derek Wippich
I
Other (As non-residents or unqualified)
0
Other (As non-residents or unqualified)
0
TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST
12
TOTAL WRITE-IN VOTES CAST
9
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
OFFICE & CANDIDATE
VOTES
PRESIDENT & VICE PRESIDENT
Cheney & Bush
132
Kerry & Edwards
128
Cobb & Lamarche
0
Van Auken & Lawrence
0
Calero & Hawkins
0
Harens & Ryan
0
Nader & Camejo
1
Perontka & Baldwin
0
Badnarik & Campagne
0
US REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 4
Peter F. Vento
20
Patrice Bataglia
109
Betty McCollum
122
STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 54B
Ryan Griffin
121
Bev Scalze
124
COUNTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT 1
Tony L. Bennett
167
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 2
Gwen Williams
78
Dorothy Waltz
69
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 3
Maij Ebensteiner
52
Jill E. Wilkinson
93
SOIL & WATER DISTRICT 5
Joseph L Fox
145
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE 6, SUPREME COURT
Alan C. Page
141
Tim Tingelstad
52
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE 5, SUPREME COURT
Sam Hanson
126
JUDGE 3, COURT OF APPEALS
Paul Elliott Ross
61
David Minge
102
JUDGE 14, COURT OF APPEALS
R. A. (Jim) Randall
87
Daniel L. Griffith
69
JUDGE 2, COURT OF APPEALS
Natalie E. Hudson
126
,JUDGE 4, COURT OF APPEALS
Wlihelmina Wright
125
JUDGE 13, COURT OF APPEALS
Randolph W. Peterson
125
JUDGE 14, COURT OF APPEALS
Michael F. Fetsch
69
Patricia M. Sifferle
77
JUDGE 1, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Edward J. Cleary
124
OFFICE & CANDIDATE
VOTES
JUDGE 3, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
George Stephenson
119
JUDGE 4,2-) DISTRICT COURT
Rosanne Nathanson
122
JUDGE 8, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
Steven D. Wheeler
118
JUDGE 9, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Paulette Flynn
121
JUDGE 10, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Kathleen R. Gearin
122
JUDGE 13, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Marybeth Dorn
120
JUDGE 16, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
M. Michael Monahan
119
JUDGE 18, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
David C. Higgs
118
JUDGE 20, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
Salvador M. Ross
114
JUDGE 23, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
JoanneM. Smith
116
JUDGE 25, 2ND DISTRICT COURT
Judith M. Tilsen
117
JUDGE 26, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
A. James Dickinson
119
JUDGE 27, 2N" DISTRICT COURT
William H. Leary
117
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
02 NOVEMBER 2004
SUMMARY OF ELECTION DAY STATISTICS
Number of voters registered and on the polling place roster at 7:00 am
266
Number of new voter registration cards filled out on election day (yellow receipts)
40
Number of preregistered voters signing the roster (blue receipts)
205
Number of accepted regular absentee ballots (envelopes with black ink)
16
Number of accepted overseas/military absentee ballots (envelopes with red ink)
0
Number of accepted Presidential Absentee Ballots (envelopes with blue ink)
0
TOTAL VOTING IN THIS STATE GENERAL ELECTION
261
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF GEM LAKE
MUNICIPAL & GENERAL ELECTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
ELECTION JUDGE & CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL
GENERAL ELECTION, 02 NOVEMBER 2004
ELECTION JUDGE APPROVAL
We, the duly appointed and sworn undersigned Judges Of Election, do hereby certify that all City Ballots cast in the
State General Election were carefully and properly tallied electronically as well as piled, checked and counted and that
the number of votes marked opposite the respective names of the candidates shows the number of votes so cast and the
ballots cast and related reports of election activity have been securely stored at Ramsey County election headquarters.
The American and Minnesota Flags were displayed on suitable staffs in and outside (American Flag only) the polls
,1i ii— tha hnnrc of vniino frnm 7-00 nm threnQh 9-00 ntn-
ATTEST
OFFICIALS NAME
OFFICIALS TITLE
SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL
Molly M. Bonin
Chief Election Judge
Kristina M. Swanson
Election Judge
/
v.�)
Dawn R. Segermark
Election Judge
Gabrielle C. Blake
Election Judge
Hilary R. Magnuson
Election Judge
C
CANVASS BOARD APPROVAL
We, the undersigned Canvass Board and Mayor of the City of Gem Lake, Ramsey County, Minnesota, having
convened on 08 November 2004, do hereby certify that the results of an election held in that City Of Gem Lake on 02
November 2004 as presented herein are a true and accurate representation of the ballots cast at said election and that
those persons elected for the offices shown shall be installed in said offices at the first meeting of the City Council of
tha City of (;em Take in iannsry ?00*3
OFFICIALS NAME
OFFICIALS TITLE
SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL
Paul Emeott
Mayor
Patrick Igo
Canvass Board
3
Roland Birkebak
Canvass Board
Charles Watson
Canvass Board
"
Richard Bosak
Canvass Board
/ C/
ATTEST
I, Frederic C. Magnuson, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Gem Lake, County of Ramsey, State of
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate representation of action taken by the City Council
of the City of Gem Lake acting in their capacity as the Election Canvass Board and duly convened on Monday, the 8`h
day of November 2004.
I)nterl At Gern Lnke- Ramsev County- Minn 31 10
08 November 2004
&rtif ieb (kohl,
e-file: Election\2004\GeneralElection\ElectionSummary.wpd
e-file: Election\2004\GeneralElection\ElectionSununary.pdf
Page 4 of 4
T. A. SCJIIFSI(Y & SONS, INC.
2370 Highway 36
NORTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109
Telephone 777-1313
Tennis Courts
Landscape Rock
Salt Sand
September 21, 2004
City of Gem Lake
1369 E County Rd E
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Attn: Fritz Magnuson
Hot Mix — Wholesale and Retail
Bituminous Surfacing
Crushed Rock and Gravel
RE: Tessier Rd, Haven Ln, Big Fox Rd, Little Fox Lane, Scheuneman Rd (Otter Lake
Rd to Hwy 61).
Dear Sir:
These are our hourly prices for snow removal equipment for the 2004-2005 snow
plowing season, as per your request.
LARGE TRUCK WITH PLOW AND WING......................................$115.00 HR
TRUCK FOR SPREADING SALT SAND .......................................... 90.00 "
SALTSAND PER TON............................................................... 23.50 «
Estimated time to plow 4 % to 5 Y2 hrs.
Fuel surcharge may apply.
Thank -you
Accepted by y
City, f GL_
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc
N
David W. Sshifsky
This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days. Payment due upon completion.
1 112% interest per month charged on past due acounts.
C
CITY OF GEM LAKE
41 Ao� Office of the City Clerk
�_ 1369 County Road "E" East —
Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231
Telephone: ( 651) 426 - 6443 Email: gemlakecity@aol.com Facsimile: ( 651 ) 426 - 6444
h-Wayirasors Chj Clad /noU/limeo%` 9*yoi cyaro% 6a61121% MW/11e7
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
HILLARY FARM
BITUMINOUS ROAD WORK vs. BUILDING PERMITS
The City of Gem Lake and Hillary Farm, LLC as Owner/Developer have entered into a
Developer's Agreement dated 23 August 2004 for the development of property to be platted as
Hillary Farm in the City of Gem Lake. The Developer's Agreement provides in part that the private
drive shall be improved consistent with the requirements and pursuant to the timetable set by the City
Engineer provided the final wear course shall be completed in the Spring/Summer following one
freeze/thaw cycle after underground utilities are accepted by the City. City Code Section 14.1.1
provides in part: "...that the subdivider will start no private construction on the lands within said
plat, nor will the subdivider file or cause to be filed any application for building permits for such
construction until all improvements required by this Ordinance have been made or arranged for in
the manner and conforming to the requirements set forth on the Final Plat." While it may still be
possible to place the first course of bituminous down during 2004, weather conditions may prevent
this. We request that the time table for completing the first course of bituminous asphalt for the
private drive be extended to the Spring of 2005 but no later than June 30, 2005. Except as modified
in this Letter Agreement, the Developer's Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Please
sign a copy of this letter to indicate your agreement.
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
HILLARY FARM, LLC
R. James M u r., t Chief Manager Dated
ACCEPTED, W:
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Paul R. Emeott, is Mayor Dated
E; l
Frederic C. agnu Dun,
City Clerk Dated
LAW OFFICES
MESLOW & OLSON, PLLC
2125 2ND STREET
WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55110
DOUGLAS B. MESLOW
ROBB L. OLSON
October 12, 2004
Mr. Fritz Magnuson
Gem Lake
1369 East County Road E
Gem Lake, MN 55110
Re: Thury property — proceeding civilly
Dear Mr. Magnuson:
Telephone (651) 426-1533
Facsimile (651) 426-6732
E-Mail: meslowlaw@usintemet.com
As we have discussed, there are numerous means of addressing the issues on the property
occupied by Joseph Thury. One is to prosecute him criminally. Another is to prosecute
his mother, the registered owner, criminally. Another is to proceed civilly under Chapter
617 of the Minnesota Laws.
Civil action can be brought for maintaining or permitting a public nuisance. The City
would proceed by sending written notice to both Joe Thury and his mother by personal
service or by certified mail. The notice must describe the condition to be corrected, and
give them thirty (30) days to abate (correct) the problems.
If the nuisance is not abated after thirty days, the City may start a lawsuit and request a
temporary injunction requiring immediate clean-up of the property. If the court finds
that a public nuisance exists, it may order abatement by the Thurys. If they do not abate
the condition, they would be in civil contempt of court, and could be put in jail until the
problem is corrected.
There are advantages to prcceeth:.g ci; illy. It is faster, and the standard of proof is lower
(preponderance of the evidence). On the other hand, it is also more expensive.
Depending on how long the case was challenged, I would estimate a minimum cost of
$2500.00 and a maximum cost of $10,000.00. The likely cost would be about $5,000.00.
1 have copies of the appropriate statutes and more information on this matter, if you
would like to have further details. Please let me know how we can assist.
ZVVerygaseslow
rs,
Mesloon LLC
`Claims `For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 11/15/2004
Paul Emeott, Mayor
Chuck Watson, Council
Roland Birkebak, Council
Richard Bosak, Council
Patrick Igo, Council
Frederic Magnuson, Clerk
CLAIM
DATE
PAID
PAID TO
SP
2057
08-Nov
Metropolitan Council
SP
2058
20-Oct
City of Gem Lake - General Fund
SP
2059
15-Nov
City of Gem Lake - General Fund
GP
6526
08-Nov
ALLEN 0.ZEPPER
GP
6526
08-Nov
Allen 0. Zepper
GP
6526
08-Nov
Allen O. Zepper
GP
6527
08-Nov
MOLLY M. BONIN
GP
6527
08-Nov
Molly M. Bonin
GP
6527
08-Nov
Molly M. Bonin
GP
6528
08-Nov
KRISTINA M. SWANSON
GP
6528
08-Nov
Kristina M. Swanson
GP
6528
08-_Nov
Kristina M. Swanson
GP
6529
08-Nov
DAWN
GP
6529
08-Nov
_R.SEGERMARK
Dawn R. Scgcrmark
GP
6529
08-Nov
Dawn R. Segermark
GP
6530
08-Nov
GABRIELLE C. BLA_KE
GP
6530
08-Nov
Gabrielle C. Blake
GP
6530
08-Nov
Gabrielle C. Blake
GP
GP
6531
6531
08-Nov
08-Nov
HILARY R, MAGNUSON
Hilary R. Magnuson
GP
6531
08-Nov
Hilary R. Magnuson
GP
6531
08-Nov
Hilary R. Magnuson
GP
6532
08-Nov
CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE
GP
6532
08-Nov
City of White Bear Lake
GP
6532
08-Nov
City of White Bear Lake
GP
6533
08-Nov
PRESS PUBLICATIONS
GP
6533
08-Nov
Press Publications
GP
6533
08-_Nov
Press Publications
GP
6533
08-Nov
Press Publications
GP
6533
08-Nov
Press Publications
GP
6534
08-Nov
E-Z Recycling. Inc.
GP
6535
08-Nov
Meslow & Olson, PLLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
MAGNUSON &_ASSOCIATES. LLC
GP
6536_
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
G11
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
I Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC_
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associalcs. LLC
GP
6536
08-Nov
Magnuson & Associates. LLC
SP
2060
15-Nov
SEII, Inc.
GP
6537
I5
Xcel Energy
GP
6538
_Nov
IS -Nov
SEFI,INC.
Signatures Approving Claims For Payment
Date Of Aonroval
DATE / /
DATE /Z/ 6./
DATE
DATE P 2- /2-v/ ® 4-
DATE Q
GENERAL I SEWER
S AMOUNT FUND 1.1 ND
Current User Charges: December 2004 I
857.60
Transfer Development Reimbursement Cost
_ 200.79
TransferM&AAdminHourlyBilling -NOV
150.00
TOTAL CLAIM
2,368.33
Plan Review for 4B2004-23
Plan Review for #B2004-24
TOTAL CLAIM
217.00
ElectionJudgeTraining: 10/30/04 2 hrs
GeneralElection: 11/2/04 13.50 hrs
_
TOTAL CLAIM
174.001
I ElectionJudgeTraining: 10/30/04 2.00 hrs
General Election: 11/2/0412,50hrs 1
TOTAL CLAIM
186.00
ElectionJudgeTraining: 10/30/04 2.00 hrs
GeneralElection: 11/2/04 13.50 hrs _
TOTAL CLAIM _
180.00
ElectionJudgeTraining: 10/30/04 2.6_0 hrs
GeneralElection: 11/2/04 13.00 hrs
TOTAL CLAIM
180.001
ElectionJudgeTraining: 10/30/04 2.00 hrs
Election Set Up: 11/01/04 2.00 hrs
GeneralElection: 11/2/04 11.00 hrs
TOTAL CLAIM
1.10141
Fire & Paramedic: November 2004
-
Fire Marshall & Inspections: November 2004
TOTAL CLAIM
208 25
LegTrans #307452: Public Notice No. 31
LegTrans #307453: Public Notice No. 27
LegTrans #307967: Notice of Public Election
LegTrans 9308949: Public Accuracy Test
Curbside Recycling: November 2004
281.30
TelConfcrcnecs&Rcsearch Re: Thury 2.5hrs X S98)
245.00
TOTAL CLAIM
4,749.86
Telephone&Facsi m i l eServi ce: Oct/Nov-2004
_ O_fficeSupplies,Copying&Postage: Sep/Oct-2004
PIP2004-0I:FedExpressToBenJohnson
ElectionSupplies&Miscellaneous Elections
Mileage:OctNov-2004( 118 $0.375)
InternetAccess-(50%):Oct/Nov-2003
lapTopComputcr-50%Monthly(S300 Bal)
Ass istantClerk,Oct/Nov-2004: 12.25 hours
ZoningAdmin. Oct/Nov-2004: 04.00 hours
ZoningAdminBillable,Oct/Nov-2004: 00.00 hours F
GeneralAdmin, Oct/Nov-2004: 21.75 hours
GeneralAdminBillable, OCUNov-2004: 01.00 hours
Sewer\dIII inFM, OcL`Nov-2004: 01.50 hours
SewerldminSC, Oct:Nov-2004: 00.75 hours
_
ElcctionManagcr:Oct/Nov-2004: 29.75 hours
CodeEnforcement:Oct/Nov-2004: 02.00 hours
Design Services For Sanitary Sewer
20.9W64
Street Lighting: October 2004
6647
TOTAL CLAIM
15,694.48
857 60
200.79
i 150.00
211.70
2,156.63
28.00
189.00
24.00
150.00
24.00
162.00
24.00
156 00
2400
2400
132.00
853 83
247.58
47.60
41.65
95.20
23.80
281.30
245.00
135.61
13.28
17.25
220.07
44.25
11.90
5000
612.50
300.00
0.00
1,631.25
75.00
11250
3750
1.i38 75
15000
66.47
20.900.64
Run Date & Time: 12/20/2004 at 12:17:44 PM File: 04claim11.123
Tlaims "For Payment CITY OF GEM LAKE Period Ending 11/15/2004
c
Paul Emeott, Mayor
Chuck Watson, Council
Roland Birkebak, Council
Richard Bosak, Council
Patrick Igo, Council
Frederic Magnuson, Clerk
Signatures Approving Claims For Payment
Date OF Approval
DATE
' f r—
DATE
U V J
I +
DATE
DATE Z
DATE
DATE
CLAIM#
DATE
PAID
I PAID TO
DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM
$ AMOUNT
GENERAL
FUND
I SEWER
FUND
GP
6538
15-Nov
SEH, Inc.
i (kolcchlnvcstlgation;TopoSurvcyForCtyErtIi61
( _ 11,418.70
GP
6538
15-Nov
SEH, Inc.
Miscellaneous Extra Service
i 360.04
GP
6538
15-Nov
SEH, Inc,
Hillary Farm Subdivision
. 3,915.74
GP
6539
15-Nov
Gopher State One -Call
IORegularTickct<a,)S1.15/ticket(+voiceonly@$2.25/e 34.00
34.00
GP
6540
15-Nov
LEONARD.O'BRIEN,SPENCER,CrALE&SAYRE-
TOTAL CLAIM
262.50
GP
6540
15-Nov
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre
MunicMtrs:NonhOaksHgtUmidangFromZonOrd
75.00
GI'
6540
15-_Nov
Leonard, O'Brien, Spencer, Gale & Sayre
Hillary Farm Development
i
187.50
GI'
6541
15_-Nov
ALLEN O. ZEPPER
TOTAL CLAIM
1.641.90
_
GP
6541
15-Nov
Allen O. Zepper
Permit Closure for #B2004-14
_ 371.14
GP
6541
15-Nov
Allen O. Zepper
i Permit Closure for #132004-16
93.75
GP
6541
15-Nov
Allen O. Zepper
1 Permit Closure for #_B2004-17
768.26
GP
6541
15-Nov
Allen O. Zepper
Permit Closure for #132004-20
_
93.75
GP
6541
15-Nov
Allen O. Zepper
Permit Closure for 4132004-22
_
93.75
GP
6541
15-Nov
Allen O. Zepper
Permit Closure for #M2004-07
97.50
GP
6541
15-Nov
_
Allen O. Zepper
Permit Closure for #M2004-09 _
60.00
GI'
6541
15-Nov
Allen O. Zepper _
Permit Closure for #P2004-04
63.75
ALL
1 1/22/2004
!, NOVEMBER SUMMARY
TOTAL FOR NOVEMBER
$49,699.53
$27,590.50
$22,109.03
8.33% Of Budget Monthly
% Annual Budget
17.84%
9.90%
7.93%
ALL
I I/22/20041
YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY
TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE
$470,358.88
$312,001.42
1158,357,41
91.67% Of Year Completed
% Annual Budget
168.80%
136.42 %
317:03
ALL
77
__
II/ /2004'
VERSUS ANNUAL91.6D7°oOfYearCOnl
lBud
($2147z�3%) ($102,359.�$'
($112,569.96)
Annual ett%Under/(%Ovver
-44.76%
-225.37%
Run Date & Time: 12/20/2004 at 12:17:44 PM File: 04claiml l.123
GENERAL FUND CHECKING 2004 CTTY OF GEM LAKE
TREASURER'S REPORT
OF GEM LAKE
.-4 County Road "E" East
Gem Lain, MN 55110-5231
GENERAL
FUND
CHECKING
PAYMENT FOR
C
H
K
I
N
8746.67
01/01/2004 START 79047.60
24861.21
262292.26
BANK
BALANCE
-286211.91
215910.981
-70300.93
TRAN
DATE
TRAM
#
CHECKS TO
DEPOSITS FROM
DEBIT
CREDIT
22295.98
BALANCE
06-Oct-04
-JP65101
CINDY SHILTS
TOTAL CLAIM
10
1,463.81
37,844.49
36,743.08
01-Oct-04
3P6511 I
CITY OF GEM LAKE -SEWER FUND
TOTAL CLAIM
10
2,000.00
35,944.49
34,743.08
2&Oct-04
3P65121
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
3RD QTR 2004 WITHHOLDING
10
(413.12
35,431.37
34,329.96
25-Oct-04
3P6513 I
MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER
TOTAL CLAIM
10
40.45
35,390.92
34,289.51
18-W-04
JP65141
Meslow & Olson, PLLC
TelConik Th
24.50
35,366.42
34,289.51
26-OM44
3P6515
Xcel EnerEy
Street Lighting Sgamber 2004
10
67.42
35,299.00
34 22.09
26-Oct-04
3P6516
E-Z Recycling, Inc.
Curbside Recycling. October 2004
10
(281.30
35,017.70
33,940.79
25.Oct-04
IP6517
SEH, INC.
TOTAL CLAIM
10
3,135.21
31,882.49
30,805.58
18-Oct-04
3P6518
Ramsey County
Law Enforcement October 2004
(5,045.191
26,837.30
30,805.58
25.Oct-04
3P6519
PRESS PUBLICATIONS
TOTAL CLAIM
10
(47.601
26,789.70
30 757-98
27-Oct-04
3P6520
CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE
TOTAL CLAIM
10
1,101.41
25 688.29
29,656.57
26-Oct-04
JP6521
Cindy Shilts
Plan Review for #B2004-19
10
1,099.97
24 588.32
28,556.60
26-Oct-04
3P6522.
LEONARD,OBRIEN,SPENCER.GAI.E&S
TOTAL CLAIM
10
6 72.00
17,616.32
21,584.60
22-Oct-04
3P6523 I
MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC
TOTAL CLAIM
10
5,187-2
12,429.04
16,397.32
18-Oct-04
3P6524
Mofly M. Bonin
Head ElectionJud Tramin . Sep 29, 2.00 ho
28.00
12,401.04
16,397.32
20-Oct-04
3P6525
PAUL R. EMEOTT
TOTAL CLAIM
10
247.50
12,153.54
16,149.82
01-0ct-04
1
Kenneth Lorenz
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
12 183.54
16,179.82
01-Oct-04
2
Tom Hansen
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
12,213.541
16,209.82
01-0ct-04
3
Roger Quam
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
12,243.541
16,239.82
01-Oct-04
4
David Gardner
2004 Individual Septic n Fee
10
30.00
12,273.54
16,269.82
01-Oct-04
5
Aaron Schwinn
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
12,303.54
16,799.82
01-Oct-04
6
MARK HENDRICKSON
TOTALPAYMENT
10
5,885.48
18,189.02
22,185.30
01-Oct-04
7
Richard Pientka
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
18,219.02
22,215.30
01-0ct-04
8
KathyRobins
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
18,249.02
22 45,30
01-Oct-04
9
Frederic Muson
2004 individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.001
18,279.02
22,275.30
01-Oct-04
10
James Kohler
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.001
18,309.02
22 305.30
n1-Oct-04
11
Gordon Kordosky
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30,001
18,339.02
22,335.30
Oct-04
12
HuRh Schilling
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
18,369.02
22 365.30
�--i-Oct-04
13
Hillary Farm, LLC
Variance Application Fee (#2004-02)
10
150.00
18,519.02
22,515.30
08-Oct-04
1
State of Minnesota
Traffic Fines: September 2004
10
72.50
18,591.52
22,587.80
08-Oct-04
2
Bryce Menk
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
18,621.52
22,617.80
08-Oct-04
3
Julie Heffern
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
18,651.52
22,647.80
08-Oct-04
41
MARK SWEET
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
40.65
18 692.17
22,688.45
08-Oct-04
5
Roland Birkebak
2004 Individual Septic ion Fee
10
30.00
18,722.17
22,718.45
08-Oct-04
6
Min Sun Lee
2004 Individual Septic ion Fee
10
30.00
18 752.17
22,748A5
08-Oct-04
7
Wallace Hilke
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
18 782.17
22,778.45
08-Oct-04
8
Suzanne Cardarelli
2004 Individual Septic Fee
10
30.00
18 812.17
22,808.45
08-Oct-04
9
Richard Pientka
Buildin Permit #B2004-20
10
125.60
18,937.77
22,934.05
08-Oct-04
10
Richard Kiestin
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
18 967.77
22,964.05
08-Oct-04
11
Mark Dvorak
2004 Individual Septic inspection Fee
10
30.00
18:997.77
22,994.05
08-Oct-04
12
William Kahl
Reimbursement for Development Costs
10
640.00
19,637.77
23,634.05
08-Oct-04
13
Susan Zasada
2004 Individual Septic lion Fee
10
30.00
19,667.77
23,664.05
08-Oct-04
14
Thomas Rasmussen
2004 Individual Septic ion Fee
10
30.00
19,697.77
23,694.05
08-Oct 04
15
Thao Moua
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
19.727.77
23,724.05
08-Oct-04
16
Daniel Osterkam
Reimbursement for GIS 359 Survey(IntUse#2
10
50.00
19,777.77
23,774.05
08-Oct-04
17
Thomas McMahon
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30,00
19,807.77
23,804.05
08-Oct-04
1
a Glenn
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
19,837.77
23,834.05
15-Oct-04
1
James Se ermark
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
19,867.77
23,864.05
15-Oct-04
2
Tom Bolting
2004 Individual Septic inspection Fee
10
19,897.77
23 894.05
] 5-0ct-04
3
Dan Schacht
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
19,927.77
23924.05
15-Oct-04
4
Maia Hendrickson
NPDES Fee for 4038 Scheuneman Road
10
E30.00
20,027.77
24,024.05
15-Oct-04
5
Jim Lindner
2004 Individual S tic Inspection Fee
10
20,057.77
24,054.05
15-Oct-04
6
Linda Hoeschler
2004 Individual Se is Inspection Fee
10
20,087.77
24,084.05
15-W-04
7
Charles Granlund
Buil Permit #B2004-21
10
20,212.77
24,209.05
15-Oct-04
8
Kath HVAC
Mechanical Permit #M2004-09
10
90,50
20,303.27
24299.55
22-Oct-04
1
ROBYN WALLIN
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
60.00
20,363.27
24,359.55
22-Oct-04
2
Patrick Igo
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
20,393.27
24,389.55
22-Oct-04
3
Peter Gaetke
2004 Individual Se tic Inspechon Fee
10
30.00
20,423.27
24,419.55
^?-0ct-04
4
SaDy Hendrickson
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
20 453.27
24,449.55
Oct-04
5
Linda Armstrong
2004 Individual Septic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
20,483.27
24,479.55
Run Date: 11/08/2004 at 02:28:17 PM E-File: PGFCheck04.123 Page 1 of 2
GENERAL FUND Ct- ECKI rG 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE
TREASURER'S REPORT
OF GEM LAKE
GENERAL
C
8746.67
24861.21
i-0 County Road "E" East
FUND
H
01/01/2004 START 79047.60
-286211.91
215910.98
-70300.93
Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231
CHECE NG
K
I
26,292.26
BANK
TRAN
TRAM
CHECKS TO
22295.98
DATE
#
DEPOSITS FROM
PAYMENT FOR
N
DEBIT
CREDIT
BALANCE
BALANCE
22-Oct-04
6
William Bride
2004 Individual SqFtic Inspection Fee
10
30.00
20,513.27
24,509.55
22-Oct-04
7
City of Gem Lake -Sewer Fund
Transfer Development Reimbursement
10
200.79
20,714.06
24,710.34
29-Oct-04
1
UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
1,152.01
21,866.07
25,862.35
29-Oet-04
2
Advanced Water & Sewer
Sewer Contractors' License #2004-03
10
150.00
22.016.07
26,012.35
29-Oct-04
3
Pfizer Heating
Mechanical Permit #M2004-10
10
238.63
22254.70
26,250.98
29-Oct-04
1
Premier Bank
Interest Paid This Period
10
41.28
22,295.98
26,292.26
Run Date: 11/08/2004 at 02:28:17 PM E-File: PGFCheck04.123 Page 2 of 2
Premier
fr;3,,:,AtGy,-._� Bank
�''''' Minnesota Owned. Minnesota Operated.
CITY OF GEM LAKE
GENERAL FUND
1369 COMUY ROAD E E
GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231
PREFERRED ELITE
Page: 1
Account Number: 6005590
Statement Date: 10/29/04
Checks/Items Enclosed: 24
Premier Bank offers the most competitive
certificate rates in Minnesota.
Call Premier Banks today for maturity
and interest payment options.
Beginning Balance 10/01/04
Deposits / Misc Credits 7
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 18
'** Ending fiance 10/31/04
Service Charge
Interest Paid Thru 10/31/04
Interest Paid Year To Date
Average Balance
Average Collected Balance
Miniamm Balance
Average Rate / Cycle Days
Enclosures
Miscellaneous Credits
Date
Deposits Withdrawals
10/01
6,365.48
10/08
30.00
10/08
1,288.75
10/15
465.50
10/22
410.79
10/29
1,540.64
10/29
41.28
Acct 6005590
43,769.48
10,142.44
27,619.66
26,292.26 **
.00
41.28
468.00
38,698
37,708
24,710
1.28516 / 31
24
Activity Description
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
INTEREST F•n U4ED
86
Q.=
MEMBER FDIC
CITY OF GEM LAKE
Paid Checks
Date Check No.
10/13
6491 0001
10/15
6492 0001
10/12
6500*0001
10/04
6503*0001
10/01
6508*0001
10/06
6510*0001
Dally Balance Summary
Date Balance
10/01
43,089.77
'04
42,981.77
_.,/06
41,517.96
10/08
42,836.71
10/12
42,796.71
Account Number:
Statement Date:
* indicates skip in check rummers
Amount
Date
Check No.
Amount
Date
184.70
10/01
6511
2,000.00
10/25
184.70
10/26
6512
413.12
10/27
40.00
10/25
6513
40.45
10/26
108.00
10/26
6515*
67.42
10/26
5,045.19
10/26
6516
281.30
10/22
1,463.81
10/25
6517
3,135.21
10/20
Page: 2
6005590
10/29/04
Check No. Amount
6519*
47.60
6520
1,101.41
6521
1,099.97
6522
6,972.00
6523
5,187.28
6525*
247.50
Date
Balance
Date
Balance
10/13
42,612.01
10/25
34,645.56
10/15
42,892.81
10/26
25,811.75
10/20
42,645.31
10/27
24,710.34
10/22
37,868.82
10/29
26,292.26
SEWER FUND CHECKING 2004 CITY OF GEM LAKE
TREASURER'S REPORT
I- _ _ _
Y OF GEM LAKE
..Vo9 County Road "E" East
Gem Lake, MN 55110-5231
SERVER
FUND
CHECKING
C
H
K
I
N
04 Jan START 41,873.66
39417.94
BANK
BALANCE
-13-SW.82
13229 .501
26790032
TRAN I
DATE
TRAN
#
CHECKS TO
DEPOSITS FROM
PAYMENT FOR
DEBIT
CREDIT I
3956034
BALANCE
25-Oct-04 ISP2052
28-Oct-04 ISP2053
Metropolitan Council
Gopher State One -Call
Current User : November 2004
IORe arTickets@$1.15/ticket(+voiceonly@$
10
10
-857.60
-34.00
45277.59
45243.59
45277.59
45243.59
254M-04 ISP2054
SEH, Inc.
Design Services for New Sanitary Sewer
10
-13927.69
31315.90
31315.90
22-Oct-04 ISP2055
MAGNUSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC
TOTAL CLAIM
10
-93.13
31222.77
31222.77
20-Oct-04 ISP2056
Paul R Emeott
Sewer Project 4 hrs @ $75/hr
10
-300.00
30922.77
30922.77
08-Nov-04 ISP2057
22-Oct-04 ISP2058
Metropolitan Council
City of Gem Lake - General Fund
Current User Charges
Transfer Development Reimbursement Cost
10
-857.60
-200.79
30065.17
29864.38
30922.77
30721.99
01-Oct-04 I
CITY OF GEM LAKE - GENERAL FUND
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
2000.00
31864.38
32721.98
01-0ct-04
2
SUMMIT FARMS REALTY
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
232.00
32096.38
32953.98
08-Oct-04
1
ALLEN DRUMMOND
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
630.00
32726.38
3358398
08-Oct-04
08-Oct-04
2
3
Properties, LLC
John Birkeland
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
10
60.00
30.00
32786.38
32816.38
33643.98
33673.98
08-Oct-04
4
White Bear Floral
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
10
120.00
32936.38
33793.98
08-Oct-04
15-Oct-04
5
1
Country Lounge, Inc.
Lorraine Birkeland
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
10
180.00
30.00
33116.38
33146.38
33973.98
34003.98
15-OU-04
2
Ruth Luh
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
33176.38
34033.98
15-Oct-04
3
WILLIAM KAHL
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
230.79
3340T 17
34264.77
15-Oct-04
15-Oct-04
4
5
Knot Skjerseth
Matt Flynn
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
10
30.00
33437.17
33467.17
34294.77
34324.77
15-Oct-04
6
Rhino Linings3rd
Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
10
g
33587.17
34444.77
15-Oct-04
7
Hoss Performance
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
10
33707.17
34564.77
15-Oct-04
8PODS
TIRE & WHEEL
TOTALPAYMQ 1T
10
33797.17
34654.77
15-Oct-04
9
Tousle Ford
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
10
1080.00
34877.17
35734.77
22-Oct-04
22-Oct-04
1
2
Kou Vang
John Hurt
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
10
30.00
30.00
34907.17
34937.17
35764.77
3579437
22-Oct-04
3
Peter Oswald
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
34967.17
35824.77
1ct-04
4
Tim Draine
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
34997.17
35854.77
Oct-04
5
Lloyd Lahore
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
35027.17
35894.77
22-Oct-04
6
Gertrude hannah
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
35057.17
35914.77
22-Oct-04
7
JOSEPH CIIERRIER
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
155.68
35212.85
36070.45
22-0et-04
8
PENNY SHEPHERD
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
100.40
35313.251
36170.a5
22-Oct-04
9
Cafe Cravings
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
10
180.00
35493.25
36350.85
22-Oct-04
10
ARNCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
166.00
35659.25
36516.85
22-Oct-04
11
PODS TIRE & WHEEL
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
90.00
35749.25
36606.85
29-Oct-04
I
Dr. R.T. Donahue
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
35779.25
36636.85
29-Oct-04
2
Tolomeo Ong
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
35809.25
36666.95
29-OU-04
3
DLW PROPERTIES
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
720.00
36529.25
37396.85
29-Oct-04
4
Larry Weber
3rd Qtr 2004 Sewer Fees/Residential
10
30.00
36559.25
37416.85
29-Oct-04
5
NAGRA, INC.
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
532.80
37092.05
37949.65
29-Oct-04
6
NAGRA, INC.
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
266.40
37358.45
38216.05
29-Oct-04
7
Mm's Ailing Auto Clinic
3rd Qtr2004 Sewer Fees/Commercial
10
120.00
37478.45
38336.05
29-Oct-04
8
AM -PM AUTO
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
144.001
37622.45
38480.05
29-Oct-04
9
BARNETT CHRYSLER JEEP KIA
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
840.00
38462.45
39320.05
29-Oct-04
10
PODS TIRE & WHEEL
TOTAL PAYMENT
10
90.001
38552.451
39410.05
29-Oct-04
1
Premier Bank
Interest Paid This Period
10
7.89
38560.34
39417.94
Run Date: 11/08/2004 at 02:34.08 PM E-File: PSFCheck04.123 Page I
/W-ii Premier
Bank Minnesota Omied. Minnesota Operated.
CITY OF GEM LAKE
SEWER FUND
1369 COUNTY ROAD E E
GEM LAKE MN 55110-5231
Page: 1
Account Number: 6005582
Statement Date: 10/29/04
Checks/Items Enclosed: 11
ATTENTION Economy, Plus and Classic Checking
Account Holders:
We will NO longer be charging a $1.00 monthly
fee for your Instant Cash & Check Card.
PREMIER PLUS CITY OF GEM LAKE
SEWER FUND
Beginning Balance 10/01/04
Deposits / Misc Credits 6
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 6
** Ending Balance 10/31/04
Se v:Lce Charge
Interest Paid Thru 10/31/04
Interest Paid Year To Date
Average Balance
Average Collected Balance
Mini zm— Balance
Average Rate / Cycle Days
Enclosures
Miscellaneous Credits
Date Deposits
10/01
2,232.00
10/08
1,020.00
10/15
1,760.79
10/22
872.08
10/29
2,803.20
10/29
7.89
Acct 6005582
46,135.19
8,695.96
15,413.21
39,417.94 **
.00
7.89
66.70
47,121
46,452
36,606
20000 / 31
11
Withdrawals Activity Description
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
DEPOSIT
INTEREST F:DJUM'P1
86
MV
MEMBER FDIC
CITY OF GEM LAIKE
Paid Checks
Date Check No.
10/25 2052 0001
10/28 2053 0001
Daily Balance summary
Account Number:
Statement Date:
Page: 2
6005502
10/29/04
* indicates skip in check numbers
Amount Date Check No. Amount Date Check No.
857.60 10/25 2054 13,927.69 10/20 2056
34.00 10/22 2055 93.13 10/22 2058*
Date Date Balance Date Balance
10/20 50,847.98 10/28 36,606.85
10/22 51,426.14 10/29 39,417.94
10/25 36,640.85
Balance
10/01
48,367.-19
10/08
49,387.19
10/15
51,147.98
Amount
300.00
200.79