Laserfiche WebLink
254 <br />255 <br />256 <br />257 <br />258 <br />259 <br />260 <br />261 <br />262 <br />263 <br />264 <br />265 <br />266 <br />267 <br />268 <br />269 <br />270 <br />271 <br />272 <br />273 <br />274 <br />275 <br />276 <br />277 <br />278 <br />279 <br />280 <br />281 <br />282 <br />283 <br />284 <br />285 <br />286 <br />287 <br />288 <br />289 <br />290 <br />291 <br />292 <br />293 <br />294 <br />295 <br />296 <br />297 <br />298 <br />299 <br />300 <br />301 <br />302 <br />303 <br />304 <br />Chair Eckman opined that someone from their respective environmental committees would be <br />appropriate. <br />For the other three (3) openings on the task force, Chair Eckman suggested that they should be someone <br />with computer skills who enjoyed doing research; and someone with an established network. <br />Member Westerberg opined that there was a need for someone on the task force with a background in <br />finance and budgeting at a city level for realistic number research. <br />Discussion of potential task force members included a representative from the no art of the GLWMO <br />(someone from the Snail Lake Improvement District); a representative of the s community since <br />commercial as well as residential properties would be impacted by financ' op r a non - agency <br />representatives or stakeholders in water quality; with other options to c ct for 'al sk force <br />members including Scott Halstad, the Freshwater Society; or the St. P A ea Chamb ommerce <br />for a recommendation of someone from their group with a bust s interest in the 5 13 or 55126 <br />area code, a resident of the GLWMO but not having lake pro y rigkts. <br />Mr. Schwartz suggested that the GLWMO Board co gue of Women Voters for a <br />representative, noting that they also study water quality issues. <br />Chair Eckman suggested that the Roseville Citizens League (RCL) be cted for a representative from <br />the senior forum, since they had both Roseville I review residen nvolved in their group. <br />Further discussion included how many task foreti ' their frequency, and number of hours <br />in order to provide a proposed time commitmen pectiv task force members. <br />Chair Eckman opined that the number of meetings s 1 ss of a commitment than the number of hours for <br />research homework for assiane <br />Member Von De Linde ested, r consensus, that one (1) GLWMO Board member be <br />assigned to each task f b is topic or project. <br />Motion 11 -06 -08 / tion Ste <br />Member Mille Mem Kan seconded approval of authorizing the Chair and Mr. Petersen <br />to imp Z d rec (5) ople as discussed during tonight's meeting, for recommendation to the <br />task foith the goal ecruit those people and report at the July 21, 2011 GLWMO Board meeting <br />for f tion. <br />Member yitheire ed, with Board Member consensus, that recruits be sought based on a short-term, <br />not long -nt; and with the group being put together quickly to allow them sufficient time to <br />complete ence by the target date of October 14, 2011; allowing time for the GLWMO <br />Board to analysis and make a recommendation to the member City Councils by their <br />respective November meeting. <br />Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />6 <br />