Laserfiche WebLink
500 Mr. Schwartz sought clarification on how some City road projects would fall under that category, and <br />501 how responsibility would be allotted for cities to meet those rules; with Ms. Correll clarifying that the <br />502 Implementation Plan budget incorporated comprehensive goals of a specific project and related costs; <br />503 with the City (ies) responsible for additional amenities and/or costs for anything above and beyond. Mr. <br />504 Schwartz noted that not all activities would be included under the GLWMO Implementation Plan, but that <br />505 cities had an entirely other independent set of rules for their activities, in addition to external reduction <br />506 goals by the GLWMO. <br />507 <br />508 Ms. Correll concurred and noted that it would also be applicable for any other private development with <br />509 the GLWMO cost -share set up to go beyond rules for mitigation; but that the TMDL broke things down <br />510 more specifically, such as what types of BMP's and types of projects would be most effective in the <br />511 watershed, creating the potential for minor plan amendments as previously referenced; and could be <br />512 designed to break things down even more and delegate which projects were whose responsibility. <br />513 <br />514 Further Board member, FOR and City staff discussion included benefits for member cities from any <br />515 improvement project to reduce internal loads and TMDL reductions in meeting their MS4 requirements; <br />516 and most watershed districts, unlike WMO's, fielding the full responsibility for BMP's. <br />517 <br />518 During the meeting, bench handouts were provided, attached hereto and made a part hereof, comprising <br />519 Mr. Petersen's e- mailed comments (dated 5.23.11) to the GLWMO Board and Ms. Correll on the <br />520 Preliminary Draft. Ms. Correll had also provided several memorandums from FOR staff, attached hereto <br />521 and made a part hereof, with Chair Eckman duly noting that these four (4) items were provided for <br />522 discussion purposes only for the preliminary DRAFT Third Generation Plan, and not meant to reflect any <br />523 final Plan provisions at this time. Documents included the following: <br />524 • May 17, 2011 Memo from FOR staff (Andrea Plevan and Camilla Correll) to MPCA staff (Ms. <br />525 Brooke Asleson) and copied to the GLWMO Board of Commissioners and Mr. Petersen, as GLWMO <br />526 Administrator, and entitled, "Revised GLWMO Watershed Restoration and Protection Plan." <br />527 • May 18, 2011 Memo from FOR staff (Camilla Correll) to the GLWMO Board, and copied to Mr. <br />528 Petersen, and Mark Maloney of the City of Shoreview and Mr. Schwartz of the City of Roseville, and <br />529 entitled, " GLWMO Internal Comments on DRAFT Watershed Management Plan." <br />530 • May 19, 2011 DRAFT Executive Summary for the Preliminary DRAFT of the Third Generation Plan. <br />531 • May 26, 2011 Memo from FOR staff (Camilla Correll) to the GLWMO Board, Mr. Petersen, Mr. <br />532 Schwartz, and Mr. Maloney, and entitled, " GLWMO Internal Comments on DRAFT Watershed <br />533 Management Plan — Amendment," incorporating additional comments (highlighted in red) and <br />534 received to -date since distribution of the Memo at the May 19, 2011 GLWMO Board meeting. <br />535 <br />536 Ms. Correll advised that the May 26, 2011 memorandum constituted the issues applicable for additional <br />537 Board consideration and/or discussion, exclusive of minor typographical and grammatical corrections <br />538 found in further reviews of the preliminary DRAFT Plan and included those suggestions by Mr. Petersen <br />539 in his e -mail. <br />540 <br />541 By consensus, the GLWMO Board concurred on the recommendations made to -date and applicable <br />542 revisions to the preliminary draft as indicated, including Mr. Petersen's recommendation to begin <br />543 building a CIP fund in 2013 for creation of a BMP escrow account for annual allocation. <br />544 <br />545 Further discussion included using best judgment to incorporate TMDL BMP's throughout the <br />546 implementation plan to address nutrients; references to page 9 related to finance/govemance structures <br />547 post plan and revised wording; budget highlights formulated for Member Miller's presentation to the <br />548 Shoreview City Council Work Session, and Chair Eckman's presentation to the Roseville City Council. <br />549 <br />11 <br />