2011-06-07_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

52 Mr. Ferrington opined that, with the GLWMO Board's transition to earlier meeting times, it may prove 53 more difficult to get public participation in their meetings; and once again asked that the Board consider 54 reverting to an evening meeting schedule to provide more opportunity for the public to attend. 55 56 Chair Eckman noted that the GLWMO Board would make sure the Third Generation Plan Public Hearing, 57 anticipated in August, would definitely be held in the evening to provide opportunity for public 58 participation after normal work hours. 59 60 While Board members present expressed their flexibility in meeting times and consideration was briefly 61 given to possible rotation of the meetings every other month from earlier to later, Mr. Petersen noted that 62 consideration would need to be given to meeting space, and advised that the Willow Room as is currently 63 being utilized due to its larger capacity to accommodate the public, was not available for evening 64 meetings on Thursday's. 65 66 Chair Eckman advised that discussing future meeting schedule /times would be deferred until the June23rd 67 regular meeting agenda for further Board consideration. 68 69 Review and Discussion of the REVISED May 6, 2011 Version DRAFT Third Generation 70 Watershed Management Plan 71 Chair Eckman noted that it was Board consensus at the May 26, 2011 Special Meeting to include 72 additional revisions by incorporating them as appropriate, with only three (3) Plan Sections redone and 73 presented tonight: Section 5.0 (Management Standards); Section 7.0 ( hmplementation Plan); and Section 74 8/0 (Watershed Management Organization Administration). Each of those Sections was reviewed for 75 any additional revisions indicated. 76 77 Section 5.0 Management Standards 78 At the request of Member Barrett, Ms. Correll identified the transferred maintenance activities from the 79 GLWMO to the City of Roseville (Section 5, Page 92). 80 81 Chair Eckman advised that the proposed budget considerations were allocated 50/50, but were subject to 82 revision based on specific projects. 83 84 With Board member concurrence, Chair Eckman requested that state agencies as referenced in 85 Section 5.1.1 (page 94) be listed in the document. 86 87 Section 7.0 Implementation Plan 88 Discussion included recognizing that the implementation plans and projects did not change even with a 89 more vigorous schedule; examples of capital improvement projects, specifically those identified as Option 90 2 projects; revised project budgets once the TMDL plan is completed and BMP's and their locations 91 identified; and recognizing that Lake Owasso was the largest water body in the WMO and that is where a 92 majority of the WMO resources would be focused. 93 94 No additional revisions to Section 7 were indicated. 95 96 Section 8.0 Watershed Management Organization Administration 97 98 Action Item 99 Chair Eckman noted that, to -date, there was no process in place for the WMO to review City Water 100 Management Plans, as mandated for WD's and WMO's; and her direction to Mr. Petersen to provide a 101 process for implementation of such a review process on the WMO's future Work Plans and for future 102 discussion; noting that it was not included in the Third Generation Plan. 2