My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9305
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9300
>
res_9305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:37:35 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 9:12:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9305
Resolution Title
Approving Tax Forfeit Property as Non-conservation Land (5/28/96).
Resolution Date Passed
5/28/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 28th day of May, 1996, <br />at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke, Wiski, and Wall, and <br />the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9305 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY AS <br />NON-CONSERVATION LAND <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has determined that the following parcels of land are non- <br />conservation lands and the City has no interest in retaining these parcels for public <br />purpose; <br /> <br />Parcel No. 14-29-23-41-0062-8 <br />Parcel No. 14-29-23-41-0063-1 <br />Parcel No. 14-29-23-41-0064-4 <br />Parcel No. 14-29-23-41-0065-7 <br />Parcel No. 14-29-23-41-0066-0 <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Roseville, that <br />the classification of these lands as non-conservation and the sale of these tax forfeited <br />parcels at public auction be approved. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member <br />Mastel, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mastel, <br />Maschka, Goedeke, Wiski, and Wall, and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.