My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7621
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7600
>
res_7621
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:18:27 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:18:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7621
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-84-4 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
7/9/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />LILLIAN OLSON, 955 Roselawn: I know about the deferral, but <br />what I'm wondering is, if we decide to sell our place, will we <br />have this big assessment and the interest on it that the new buyer <br />would have to consider. <br /> <br />DEMOS: You are connected. <br /> <br />OLSON: We are connected in the front. They said that this <br />assessment would go against our boys. <br /> <br />DEMOS: It would be on the rolls as deferred, and we said the <br />way its done would be a negotiable item. If the land were pro- <br />bably never to be developed, there would be no reason to assess <br />it. <br /> <br />OLSON: But would it show on the records? On our deed or <br />anything, this big assessment. <br /> <br />DEMOS: It would have to show that it was deferred and there <br />would be a reason showing why it was deferred, right Mr. Honchell? <br /> <br />HONCHELL: If someone requested a check on a property, it <br />would show as a deferred assessment without a specific date for <br />collection. The collection would be triggered at such time as the <br />property would be subdivided and needed to use the sewer. Again, <br />this is an item that you could negotiate with the buyer. It is <br />not automatic that you would have to pay that off. <br /> <br />OLSON: But if there is any road through it, then the place <br />shouldn't have an assessment against it. <br /> <br />HONCHELL: Well, except that it's potentially usable in the <br />future. When there is a potential for additional development, the <br />City does in the case of sewer, street, utilities and storm sewer <br />put it on the assessment roll, but they are deferred until <br />actually needed. It's a very common practice. <br /> <br />OLSON: Well, when the rest of us took the sewer, why didn't <br />the rest of them take it then also? <br /> <br />HONCHELL: I can't tell you that, (inaudible). It mayor may <br />not have been the depth, but at this point if we simply took the <br />corner of Victoria and Roselawn, it wouldn't be possible to serve <br />those homes with a gravity sewer, because the sewer is simply to <br />high. We need to get a location for the sewer that has enough <br />depth. Certain parcels and a location like that which is over on <br />Chatsworth have to have a deeper sewer to provide services to <br />the land. <br /> <br />DEMOS: Anyone else? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.