My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0822
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2011 9:29:55 AM
Creation date
9/14/2011 9:29:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/22/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 22,2011 <br /> Page 12 <br /> were more relevant to the discussion later for Step One Implementation of the <br /> Master Plan; and whether it was folded into parks maintenance and the Master <br /> Plan. <br /> Councilmember Johnson opined that the community offered a resounding "yes" <br /> as to whether they valued their parks system; with over 1,400 residents involved <br /> in the Implementation Plan; and clearly stating what they wanted in constella- <br /> tions. When he voted to accept it, Councilmember Johnson opined that he didn't <br /> intend to dispute it two (2) years later; and from his familiarity with the Master <br /> Plan, he wanted it to go forward. Councilmember Johnson opined that it really <br /> irked him to come back full circle and suggest elimination of the PIP. <br /> Mayor Roe requested that the discussion remain broad at this point. <br /> Councilmember Willmus, in addressing Councilmember Johnson's point about <br /> the PIP and the need to maintain those dollars going forward, opined that he was <br /> very supportive of it, further opining that the City had put itself in the position of <br /> not funding its own infrastructure. <br /> Councilmember Johnson opined that it wasn't just parks infrastructure; with <br /> Councilmember Willmus concurring that it was city-wide. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that capital improvements were one thing, while maintenance <br /> was another; and it behooved the City to ensure that they had sufficient staff to <br /> perform regular and consistent maintenance on its capital infrastructure. <br /> With Mayor Roe's concurrence, Councilmember Willmus asked individual De- <br /> partment Heads to address anything in the budget materials that the City Council <br /> may have overlooked. Mayor Roe suggested that each Department Head provide <br /> a summary commentary with any insights they may have. <br /> City Manager Malinen reiterated the request of Councilmember Johnson <br /> voiced earlier: <br /> "Councilmember Johnson suggested that, as part of that Q &A time with staff, <br /> part of their response include any impacts to their specific departments in im- <br /> plementing the recommendations of City Manager Malinen in his Memoran- <br /> dum dated August 4, 2011 (Attachment A) to use half of the additional state <br /> funds due to elimination of the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC)for <br /> operating costs; and the other half to diminish the levy by a percentage;specifi- <br /> cally how it may change the original reduction by three (3) FTE's." <br /> Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke <br /> Mr. Brokke noted that the revised City Manager-recommended budget restored all <br /> proposed cuts in his department, with the exception of the PIP, still proposed to be <br /> cut by $140,000, a substantial cut. Mr. Brokke noted that the PIP program had <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.