res_9325 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ARTICLE XIII. EFFECTIVE DATE: DURATION Section î. ·lhÎs agreement continues in effect indefinitely uniess terminated in accordance with its terms. This agreement is accompanied by the member resolution authorizing its execution is filed by the initial members with City Clerk of the City of Roseville. ARTICLE XIV. EVALUATION OUTCOMES The I35W Corridor Coalition seeks the following outcomes and periodically will measure success against stated goals to deteuIÎine whether the I35W Conidor Coalition should continue as a Joint Powers effort: Section 1. Transportation infrastructure improvements resulting in improved service, business growth and labor availability. Section 2. Implementation of ajoint marketing program that attracts and retains quality industrial and commercial tax base and employment. Section 3. Identify business base and redevelopment opportunities and develop a strategic marketing pian for Corridor communiíies. Section 4. Implement a code of ethics for participating communities for use of attraction and retention tools. Section 5. Provide affordable housing and life-cycle housing for all residents and employees of the business base employers. Section 6. Secure a fair share of available metropolitan area public and private investment resources. Section 7. Create a useable business information data base and GIS system. Section 8. Design a comprehensive land use policy for the Corridor. Section 9. Provide an effectively trained work force to meet the needs of the Corridor business base. Section 10. Promote reverse commuting and employee mobility plans that will benefit area employers and their employees. Section 11. IdentifY contaminated sites, secure funding to redevelop and ensure quality development. Section 12. Adopt operating policies and framework so that goals and objectives of organization can be achieved. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member Mastel and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke, Wall and the following voted against the same: None. 7