Laserfiche WebLink
Master <br />This <br />Comment <br />Date <br />Who Made Comment <br />List # <br />Tables # <br />different than those in Florida. It was interesting to note that the results obtained from Lake Mizell were not as conclusive because it was frequently used for recreational <br />activities which made it difficult to maintain a valid control. This suggests that while the GLWMO proposes to conduct a "test ", on this very real recreational lake, Lake <br />Owasso, it would need very large areas of no boat traffic to maintain a valid control. <br />335 <br />85 <br />Carp also have been earmarked as stirring up the sediment in the lake bed. Carp have been a very real factor in the waters of Lake Owasso for many years. The carp are an <br />September 15, <br />Jill Roberts <br />issue and the plan should address their removal. <br />2011 <br />340 <br />86 <br />1.9.f To address internal loading (in Lake Owasso) work with member communities to test the impacts of establishing a no boating area or no wake zone on certain portions of <br />September 15, <br />Jill Roberts <br />the lake (e.g. shallow areas) for a defined time period; the goal being to make it a permanent ordinance if the results are positive. <br />2011 <br />341 <br />87 <br />I am opposed to the test of a Lake Owasso no /wake, no /boat areas. This "test' carries with it heavy ramifications, a few include: <br />September 15, <br />Jill Roberts <br />Safety, in concentrating boat traffic in a smaller area of the lake. <br />2011 <br />A decrease in property values of home owners on the lake. <br />Minnesota has many boating enthusiasts that value boating and recreation on Minnesota lakes and have invested a great deal of money in purchasing equipment <br />that could not be used. <br />The goal of maintaining the lake for recreational pleasure is stated in the GLWMO document. Implementing this "test' results in negating recreational lake pleasure <br />for many individuals and should be removed from this draft plan. <br />Implementing a "specific monitoring activity: Develop and implement an investigation to better assess the magnitude of the impact of motorized watercraft activities <br />on phosphorus loads to the system, by monitoring water quality on days of high use." (21.1b, page 128) <br />This appears subjective and needs better clarification. <br />345 <br />88 <br />I am against spending $2500 to evaluate establishing a no boating area or no -wake zone portions of Lake Owasso. This proposal is in conflict with the page 9 Executive <br />September 15, <br />Jill Roberts <br />Summary paragraph that states, "Recreation is a key reason the residents of GLWMO are interested in the local lakes, ponds, and wetlands." <br />2011 <br />346 <br />89 <br />GLWMO Executive Summary 1 18 <br />September 15, <br />Jill Roberts <br />SNAIL LAKE <br />2011 <br />Recreational Uses: <br />Fishing, boating, swimming <br />Should other sports including waterskiing, wakeboarding, knee boarding, or tubing be included in this use statement? <br />GLWMO Executive Summary 20 <br />BENNETT LAKE <br />Recreational Uses: <br />Fishing, canoeing <br />GLWMO Executive Summary 21 <br />Issue Summary: <br />Bennett Lake, which is located in the City of Roseville's Central Park, has poor water quality and is listed as impaired by the state, due to excessive nutrients. <br />Lake Bennett has neither boat activity nor water sport and yet is cited for poor water quality. <br />This Lake drains into Owasso. <br />350 <br />90 <br />Grass Lake WMO Watershed Management Plan — 6/201140 <br />September 15, <br />Jill Roberts <br />The Lake Owasso Use Attainability Analysis (Barr, 2009) is a lake management plan that includes a diagnostic study that assesses the water quality of the lake, identifies water <br />2011 <br />quality issues, and recommends structural, non - structural, and in -lake practices to achieve water quality improvement. A watershed model (using the software P8) was <br />developed to evaluate the phosphorus loads generated in the watershed. The following are the main conclusions of the study: <br />DDAnnual water and phosphorus budgets were developed, based on monitoring from 2007 and 2008, that identified the following phosphorus sources to the lake: <br />watershed <br />runoff, internal loading from ponds and wetlands within the watershed, direct <br />Grass Lake Watershed Management Organization — 2011 Watershed Management Plan Response to Comments: 60 -dav review period <br />9/19/2011 Page 13 <br />