My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0508_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0508_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2011 10:59:05 AM
Creation date
9/28/2011 10:53:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Examples: <br /> Joe Simpson owns an accounting office and is a big sports fan. Because he bet the Gophers <br /> would win the Big Ten Football title last year (and they didn't), he must fly the red Badger flag <br /> for one year. He proposes, under the new ordinance, to fly the Badger and Packer fan flags and a <br /> U.S. flag on separate poles in front of his office. The flags would be permitted. <br /> Stan's car sales operation proposes flying 32 American, Japanese, Korean, and German flags <br /> around his site, with the proper setback, honoring the workers and countries.. . .he does not need a <br /> permit because the flags carry no commercial message. <br /> Mary Jones owns a pet store and has been asked to take on a new line of fish food. The <br /> manufacturer has offered to pay for a new flag and bright orange flagpole, if she will fly the <br /> corporate symbol-- a fat smiling carp and the words "Fishy Farms Foods". . . . Mary can fly the <br /> flag but must count the flag and its commercial message as part of the total allowable signage on <br /> her building. <br /> If Mary wished to distribute Fishy Foods from her home and oversized garage, and flew such a <br /> commercial flag at her residence, a flag/sign permit would not be issued because she proposes a <br /> commercial venture in a residential zone. <br /> Arnie Gogan is adamant! The State Legislature cannot pass a bill creating a suburban light rail <br /> tunnel under his commercial property. On his business flagpole he flies a new flag expressing his <br /> feelings, "Legislative Shaft Prohibited Here". It is a non-commercial message allowed on the <br /> flag. The flag would be permitted. <br /> Planning File #3 190 (Sign Ordinance -Flag)RCA 04/24/00 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.