My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_1113_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_1113_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2011 10:25:01 AM
Creation date
9/29/2011 10:19:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes-10123100, continued on 10/30/00 <br /> DRAFT Copy Page 7 <br /> heightened requirements of Section 1006.02 of the <br /> Roseville City Code. <br /> F. Any signage for the bingo hall shall meet the <br /> requirement of 1009.03 or the Roseville City Code. <br /> G. Trash containers shall meet City enclosure and 1 or <br /> screening requirements. <br /> H. Seating in the bingo hall shall be limited to 300 seats. <br /> I. No serving or license to serve alcohol shall be allowed <br /> on the premises. <br /> J. If a building permit and construction activity have not <br /> begun within six months of the CUCP approval, the <br /> CUP shall be considered null and void.] <br /> Roll Call, Ayes: Maschka and Mastel. Nays: Goedeke, Wiski and <br /> Kysylyczyn. Motion failed. <br /> Wiski moved, Goedeke seconded, to instruct the City Attorney to <br /> put together the materials, ____.__. ' ' <br /> to deny the Conditional Use <br /> Permit on the basis of not being compatible with adjoining <br /> properties, its impacts on traffic and public facilities, its impact on <br /> property value, impacts on general health, safety, welfare and non-- <br /> compatibility with the Roseville Comprehensive Plan; specifically, <br /> the parking dilemma, and impacts on parking, and specifically the <br /> neighborhood retail center versus the amusement/entertainment <br /> center: to instruct the City Attorney to prepare a clear statement of <br /> findings for denial which are the basis for the City Council's <br /> previous roll call vote. Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Maschka, Wiski, <br /> and Kysylyczyn. Nays: Mastel. <br /> I-2 This item was considered after I-3 Resolution 9828 <br /> Wiski moved, Mastel seconded, by resolution, to approve variances Roberta Sladky <br /> for Roberta Sladk , 3 82 North McCarrons Boulevard, including: a 382 N McCarrons By <br /> Y g <br /> 2.1 foot west side and setback variance; a 52 foot lot width variance Variances <br /> Y <br /> at the shoreline• and a 42 foot house setback variance from the shore (PD3266) <br /> line for the reconstruction of an attached four season porch, from <br /> Section 10 16.22A 1 (Non-conformities), Section 10 16.16 (Structure <br /> Design Standards), and Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions <br /> and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard and Lot Area <br /> Requirements in R-1 Districts) of the Roseville City Code, with <br /> findings as listed in Section 5.1 of the project report. Roll Call, <br /> Ayes: Maschka, Wiski, Mastel and Kysylyczyn. Nays: Goedeke. <br /> I-3 This item was considered after H-2. Resolution 9827 <br /> Wiski moved, Mastel seconded, by resolution, mntio-in Azritfpr�' David Kenney <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.