Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council subsequently at the March 22, 1999 meeting <br /> adopted an interim ordinance (moratorium) No. 1220 temporarily prohibiting development <br /> within the "'S-C"Zoning District for parcels Adjacent to Areas Zoned for Residential Uses; and <br /> WHEREAS,the Roseville City Council subsequently at its April 1 ,1999 meeting adopted <br /> an interim ordinance (moratorium) No. 1221 extending and amending Ordinance No. 12202 <br /> Temporarily Prohibiting Development Within the "'S-C" Zoning District; and <br /> VHEREA ,the proposed development of Bradley Limited Partnership is affected by the <br /> interim ordinance and may be affected by possible changes to official controls arising out of the <br /> study currently being undertaken by the City as directed by the City Council at its April 12, 1999 <br /> meeting;and <br /> WHEREAS,the proposed vacation of the drainage and utility easement, the conveyance <br /> of a replacement easement, and the proposed relocation or rerouting of utility lines may be <br /> unnecessary or wasteful given the potential for possible changes to official controls affecting the <br /> Parcel; and <br /> WHEREAS,the utility lines currently located in the easement are not in immediate need <br /> of repair and any construction activity increases the potential for disruption of an essential public <br /> service and inconvenience to the public; and <br /> WHEREAS,the property owner is not precluded or limited in its ability to request vacation <br /> and relocation of the easement and utility lines in the future, <br /> NOW THEREFORE RE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br /> Minnesota,hereby determines that the request to vacate and relocate certain utility and drainage <br /> easements and utility lines is premature, and otherwise is not in the public interest, given the <br /> interim ordinances adopted by the City Council and the pendency of the planning study <br /> referenced above,and that the request to vacate said easement is hereby denied. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br /> Member ,and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> and the following voted against the same: <br /> WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />