Laserfiche WebLink
The process also allows the 04y to consider the location of the build W s, cor patiblIj , <br /> parkinje areas and other features with rep ect to the topozrgphy of the area and ea st <br /> natural,features,- the efficiency, adequacy and safes OL the proposed layout of internal <br /> streets and drive s* the a eguacy and location of jzreen areas; the adeauncy, location <br /> and screeninio of parkiniz areas,- and such other matters as the i(y may find to have a <br /> material bear n the stated standards and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use <br /> Plan. <br /> 2.0 Background <br /> 2.1 on March 10, the Roseville Planning Commission held the required public hearing <br /> regarding the above request. At this meeting a number of adjacent residents addressed <br /> the Commission regarding concerns with the location of the proposed structure and its <br /> proximity to the north and east property lines. Further, concerns were raised regarding <br /> screening and landscaping of the building that would be provided along the north and east <br /> property boundary. The residents also suggested that the entry tower be lowered. <br /> 2.2 The Planning Commission also raised a number of these concerns and requested further <br /> information by the petitioner regarding side (north) and rear yard (east) setbacks, <br /> landscaping, and architectural modifications, prior to receiving a vote on the concept <br /> PUD request. <br /> 2.3 On March 22, 1999 the City Council, by resolution, approve a 60 day extension of the <br /> 60-day review period, from March 22, 1999 to May 26, 1999, in response to the adjacent <br /> resident concern and Planning Commission's request of the applicant for further <br /> information regarding the development proposal. <br /> 2.4 Since the March 10 Planning Commission meeting the applicant met with City Staff and <br /> Meld a neighborhood meeting to discuss the concerns and present alternative <br /> modifications to the site plan. The applicant has provided a modified site plan and <br /> elevations taping into consideration the following issues; (refer to April 7, 1999 letter <br /> from Cryogenic Laboratories) <br /> The gross square footage has been reduced by 15 percent from 9,108 sf to 7.366 sf. <br /> East setback has been revised from 3 to 5 feet from the property line. <br /> The south side of the building has been pulled back 22 feet from the Suburban True <br /> Value Hardware building creating a landscaped separation between the buildings per <br /> the resident's request. <br /> - Landscaping shall be place entirely on the applicant's property line and the east wall <br /> will be constructed of stucco in the form of a relief arcade with trellis and vines. <br /> - The turret/tower has been reduced in height from 36 feet to 29 feet with illumination <br /> directed away from the east. <br /> PF3 077-RPCA(04-14-99)-Page 2 of 6 <br />